tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2889374702124232972024-03-13T13:37:03.001-07:00Uncle Vladdi's BlogVlad's Your Uncle, So Who's Your Vladdi?Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.comBlogger688125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-30174398241916723362024-02-21T20:48:00.000-08:002024-02-21T20:48:49.309-08:00The realities of survival prove the feminist power fantasy is delusional<p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">These days we hear a lot about the concept of the "male power fantasy," usually about the feminist accusation of "toxic masculinity." In other words, feminists argue that the male power fantasy is a social construct that makes men aggressive, and aggression is supposedly the cause of most of society's ills.</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">However, if one studies the archetypal ideas of heroism (a hallmark of the male power fantasy), what we almost always find are stories of self-sacrifice. Power, for most men, is meant to be used in service to others; to protect and to provide for those who cannot protect themselves. This symbolism is found in literature, television and movies centered on powerful male figures time and time again. Rather than being "toxic," men are compelled by their relationship to power to achieve something greater for all the people around them.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">This is not to say that there are no men with twisted motives. History is splattered with male rulers who have abused their authority and committed a host of atrocities. These men, however, are the exception to the rule. The majority of men fantasize about being heroes with a moral code, not villains.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The hero's journey usually requires a struggle to attain the power that will eventually be used by the man. It is at least subconsciously understood that power attained without experience and wisdom leads to corruption. In other words, for men, great power comes with great responsibility.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju4FSaxClhrprHctzUZBFdyvSADXYscFxb0HM3OhS_4JR1f5Q_IgJ1NvONm2m_ghcup6Q2R2hzSRtj24E-qSaFwJR8CgUpBrNImFtPJvP2Am9QL4vJBFyQPj-dzd12dfSF7-HAPA4gnKF3DY6lWNLqGoVkgq1J4xhUGzw67_vfxYxrqx2qDmJFmIzB/s680/ToxicMasculinityForREALZ.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="680" data-original-width="569" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju4FSaxClhrprHctzUZBFdyvSADXYscFxb0HM3OhS_4JR1f5Q_IgJ1NvONm2m_ghcup6Q2R2hzSRtj24E-qSaFwJR8CgUpBrNImFtPJvP2Am9QL4vJBFyQPj-dzd12dfSF7-HAPA4gnKF3DY6lWNLqGoVkgq1J4xhUGzw67_vfxYxrqx2qDmJFmIzB/s16000/ToxicMasculinityForREALZ.jpg" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The female power fantasy, unfortunately, is very different. For feminists, great power means never having to take responsibility for anything ever.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">When women with power are written by women (specifically feminists) or woke activists, you will see a considerable juxtaposition when it comes to how that power is attained and used. A female power fantasy does not require a woman to be a hero. In fact, they often act like villains; they tend to be selfish and narcissistic, and they lack depth and the redeeming qualities often associated with principled women. When women fantasize about power, they are more likely to reflect dark masculine qualities instead of nurturing feminine qualities.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">There is no archetypal hero's journey for modern women. In popular culture, female icons usually gain power automatically without any struggle. They are born with magical abilities, magical or God-given talents, or they "manifest" power by sheer psychological will (the fantasy of witchcraft). They imagine what they want, and what they want is supposed to come to them magnetically.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">In the past, such stories of female fantasies involved women using sexuality to influence men to do what they want (sexuality being the magical power). That said, this dynamic has long perturbed feminists who like the idea of sexual manipulation but don't like the idea of women still relying on men to project their "agency." So, in modern times, feminists have shifted female power more into the realm of men, with women acting like men, using force like men and asserting psychological dominance like men. </span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Furthermore, the real source of magic for feminists is in controlling centers of society, the government being their holy grail.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">But here's where things go awry. Women are not men and will never be capable of what men are capable of. That is to say, men can survive without women, but women will never be able to survive without men. It's a cold hard reality that feminists simply do not understand.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiszqENeOYEMDSSI11FC4qrz9FB-ibJsGOGv6AuJDWPoS3_96Ds9tevPQWRTSkHcui-Vt8ss7zRrG6EToIxmE8ABVZqve1Xv54qfaRqIDdAIjPFWPVK7Y1pPTMkuHErlacD0MwUjYTGZzlMD53NeIbU1ZOgjSAx9sLOOkcnd8j9fYUGi4GRbBQEQo5E/s700/FeministPickle.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiszqENeOYEMDSSI11FC4qrz9FB-ibJsGOGv6AuJDWPoS3_96Ds9tevPQWRTSkHcui-Vt8ss7zRrG6EToIxmE8ABVZqve1Xv54qfaRqIDdAIjPFWPVK7Y1pPTMkuHErlacD0MwUjYTGZzlMD53NeIbU1ZOgjSAx9sLOOkcnd8j9fYUGi4GRbBQEQo5E/s16000/FeministPickle.png" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Woke activists like to claim with a certain tinge of glee that "the world is changing" and conservative men are angry because "the patriarchy is losing power." I find this argument fascinating because it is so self-contradictory: If the patriarchy exists and men really are a monolithic power structure, then frankly, there is nothing stopping us from crushing feminists under our boots like bugs and taking all that power back.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Women, by virtue of their biology, have no power. At least not in the way that men do. Any power they think they have taken was actually given to them by men. Men allow women to have the freedoms they enjoy in the Western world, there is no power struggle. I'm sure some feminists will accuse me of chauvinism here, but this is a fact. Women have equal rights and opportunities to men in the West because men want them to. If there was a patriarchy, those rights would not exist.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Just look at any Muslim fundamentalist nation, where you will find real patriarchy. Feminists have no influence because the men in those societies do not allow them any. It just takes a flip of a switch, and all the power feminists think they have gained can be confiscated in an instant. So please ladies, don't delude yourselves and be thankful Western men are so inclined to appreciate and support the women around them.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The next most common argument from feminists is that women don't actually "need men." I think for first-wave feminists this was limited to the idea that women don't need men for personal happiness or personal success. That's debatable but I'm not really interested in whether or not feminists feel affirmed in their daily lives. The problem arises with third-wave feminism and the fantasy that women don't need men for anything, including the stability of society.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Let’s make this clear right up front: Men built almost everything in civilization. Men maintain almost everything in civilization. Everything you see around you, from the buildings to the roads to the utilities to the factories to national security, it's all built and kept running by men. All those ugly but necessary jobs that women don't want to do or are incapable of doing are done by men.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Feminists like to assert that women only need men for protection from other men. If men did not exist, they would be safe. This is a hilariously naive assumption, and it is only spoken by women in first-world societies where they have never been forced to experience true survival.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">If men were to disappear tomorrow, civilization would collapse. Women might not have to worry about men, but they would have to worry about functioning in an environment without any amenities or modern comforts. They would not last more than a couple of weeks.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">We know this for a fact because there have been multiple survival experiments in recent years with all-women groups that ended in disaster. They are either forced to rely on male groups to survive, or, they have to tap out and leave the experiment completely. A famous example is the old <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/15799/242154/91728c7d00b986f24f367b35375de38ad9d5be4a/88a91b13edf087fc523e57f1ff93616871d87210" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Bear Grylls battle of the sexes experiment</a>, but it's not the only one and the results are generally the same across the board.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Feminists talk big, but they fold like wet paper when they're placed in a situation where they must legitimately struggle to live.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The world is an inhospitable place, especially without men. The feminist power fantasy relies on the notion that they are capable of doing whatever men can do. It's just not true, and the requirements are not limited to the physical. There is a dangerous lack of organizational ability among women, at least where completing concrete tasks is concerned.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgd3bBD3Mekdqb3I2W2pZg6Xd9F4ALOcXbbtXWkCR-PNJJHW5Le9HLKf1Da4Y7iJ_DhSXYb7WllTzmtfEyw3PAb067tFklaDJvi7g9ri2KoIn_Rqph0kcPau-jmWJIGAEiLQPi2FxN-4IyEBDUxscq9W4qkEaihKSDHwBMVGTlozqcaB7HRwAwND4v/s2000/WomenAreRetarded.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1972" data-original-width="2000" height="630" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgd3bBD3Mekdqb3I2W2pZg6Xd9F4ALOcXbbtXWkCR-PNJJHW5Le9HLKf1Da4Y7iJ_DhSXYb7WllTzmtfEyw3PAb067tFklaDJvi7g9ri2KoIn_Rqph0kcPau-jmWJIGAEiLQPi2FxN-4IyEBDUxscq9W4qkEaihKSDHwBMVGTlozqcaB7HRwAwND4v/w640-h630/WomenAreRetarded.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">In another famous example of an all-female experiment, in 2005 a female TV producer decided to build a media-based business from the ground up with only female employees. No men were allowed because she believed men had an easy ride. The company quickly imploded two years later due to lack of work ethic, <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/15799/242154/9ab9d3e324dba20e82d2b912a2c3e091befa6f2c/88a91b13edf087fc523e57f1ff93616871d87210" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">lack of direction and infighting</a>. The CEO admitted openly that an all-female staff was a terrible idea. She noted:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p><blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">"While I stand by my initial reason for excluding male employees — because they have an easy ride in TV — if I were to do it again, I'd definitely employ men. In fact, I'd probably employ only men..."</span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">My point is the feminist power fantasy can only exist in a first-world society where men have already built the majority of necessary amenities needed for survival. It is within these comfort-focused environments where feminists thrive, if only because women have so much time on their hands to ponder the little things rather than being concerned about what they will eat, where they live and who will keep them safe.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHiMvUYTBTIQMZNKBMv7ZwuPCFFOIuOaFn8b2N-fEL0wprgUU1vkqNz1kLx-RSIsZuMk3VkI8Ljz6ARI06YKOZaK9AibGeGdGwijba2h2hbX7W2QKW4aSo8VR1D4hNkBhub7NaknbTTTgW68jHtbwL_86DB8b08q0oZIpUPu3zzr1EnNePnIqS2HGc/s1080/ToxicMasculinity.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1068" data-original-width="1080" height="633" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHiMvUYTBTIQMZNKBMv7ZwuPCFFOIuOaFn8b2N-fEL0wprgUU1vkqNz1kLx-RSIsZuMk3VkI8Ljz6ARI06YKOZaK9AibGeGdGwijba2h2hbX7W2QKW4aSo8VR1D4hNkBhub7NaknbTTTgW68jHtbwL_86DB8b08q0oZIpUPu3zzr1EnNePnIqS2HGc/w640-h633/ToxicMasculinity.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">In a survival scenario, feminists cease to exist. They die, or they give up on feminism and seek the aid of men. It might be prudent for modern women in the West to keep this reality in mind because in the past, first-world countries have been known to fall into third-world status with shocking regularity.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />To truth and knowledge,</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Brandon Smith</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty Media Group</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-31966734149102877492024-01-07T20:08:00.000-08:002024-01-07T20:13:18.534-08:00Ein jüdischer Überläufer warnt Amerika<p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>SIE LASSEN DIESES NICHT LANGE BLEIBEN, ALSO HERUNTERLADEN ES, SOWIE SIE KÖNNEN!</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Was erwartet uns jetzt? Wenn wir einen Weltkrieg auslösen, der sich zu einem Atomkrieg entwickeln könnte, ist die Menschheit am Ende. Warum könnte ein solcher Krieg stattfinden? Es wird stattfinden, während sich der Vorhang für Akt 3 hebt: Akt 1 war der Erste Weltkrieg, Akt 2 war der Zweite Weltkrieg, Akt 3 wird der Dritte Weltkrieg sein. Die Juden der Welt, die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensbrüder überall sind entschlossen, die Vereinigten Staaten erneut zu nutzen, um Palästina dauerhaft als Stützpunkt ihrer Weltregierung zu behalten. Das ist genauso wahr, wie ich hier stehe. Nicht nur ich habe es gelesen, sondern viele hier haben es auch gelesen, und es ist auf der ganzen Welt bekannt.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Ein jüdischer Überläufer warnt Amerika</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Einleitende Anmerkung</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> Benjamin H. Freedman war einer der faszinierendsten und erstaunlichsten Menschen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Er wurde 1890 geboren und war ein erfolgreicher jüdischer Geschäftsmann aus New York City und einst Haupteigentümer der Woodbury Soap Company. Nach dem jüdisch-kommunistischen Sieg von 1945 brach er mit dem organisierten Judentum und verbrachte den Rest seines Lebens und den Großteil seines beträchtlichen Vermögens, mindestens 2,5 Millionen Dollar, damit, die jüdische Tyrannei aufzudecken, die die Vereinigten Staaten erfasst hat.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Herr Freedman wusste, wovon er sprach, denn er war ein Insider auf höchster Ebene jüdischer Organisationen und jüdischer Machenschaften, um die Macht über unser Land zu erlangen. Herr Freedman war persönlich mit Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy und vielen weiteren Machern unserer Zeit bekannt.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Diese Rede wurde 1961 vor einem patriotischen Publikum im Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. im Namen von Conde McGinleys damaliger patriotischer Zeitung „Common Sense“ gehalten. Auch wenn diese weitreichende und improvisierte Rede in mancherlei Hinsicht veraltet ist, ist die wesentliche Botschaft von Herrn Freedman an uns – seine Warnung an den Westen – dringlicher als je zuvor. -- K.A.S.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Benjamin Freedman spricht:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Hier in den Vereinigten Staaten haben die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensgenossen die vollständige Kontrolle über unsere Regierung. Aus vielen Gründen, zu zahlreich und zu komplex, um hier näher darauf einzugehen, regieren die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensbrüder diese Vereinigten Staaten, als wären sie die absoluten Monarchen dieses Landes. Nun mögen Sie sagen, das sei eine sehr weit gefasste Aussage, aber lassen Sie mich Ihnen zeigen, was passierte, während wir alle schliefen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Was ist passiert? Im Sommer 1914 brach der Erste Weltkrieg aus. Es gibt hier nur wenige Menschen in meinem Alter, die sich daran erinnern. Nun wurde dieser Krieg einerseits von Großbritannien, Frankreich und Russland geführt; und auf der anderen Seite von Deutschland, Österreich-Ungarn und der Türkei.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Innerhalb von zwei Jahren hatte Deutschland diesen Krieg gewonnen: nicht nur nominell, sondern tatsächlich. Die für die Welt überraschenden deutschen U-Boote hatten alle Konvois aus dem Atlantik gefegt. Großbritannien stand da, ohne Munition für seine Soldaten, mit Lebensmittelvorräten für eine Woche – und danach Hungersnot. Damals hatte die französische Armee meutert. Sie hatten 600.000 der Blüte der französischen Jugend bei der Verteidigung von Verdun an der Somme verloren. Die russische Armee flüchtete, sie holten ihre Spielsachen und gingen nach Hause, sie wollten nicht mehr Krieg spielen, sie mochten den Zaren nicht. Und die italienische Armee war zusammengebrochen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Auf deutschem Boden sei kein einziger Schuss abgefeuert worden. Kein einziger feindlicher Soldat hatte die Grenze nach Deutschland überschritten. Und doch bot Deutschland England Friedensbedingungen an. Sie boten England einen ausgehandelten Frieden auf der Grundlage dessen an, was die Juristen als Status quo ante bezeichnen. Das bedeutet: „Lasst uns den Krieg beenden und alles so lassen, wie es war, bevor der Krieg begann.“ England dachte im Sommer 1916 ernsthaft darüber nach. Sie hatten keine Wahl. Entweder akzeptierte Deutschland diesen ausgehandelten Frieden, den Deutschland ihnen großzügig anbot, oder es führte den Krieg fort und erlitt eine völlige Niederlage.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Währenddessen gingen die Zionisten in Deutschland, die die Zionisten aus Osteuropa vertraten, zum britischen Kriegskabinett und – ich werde mich kurz fassen, weil es eine lange Geschichte ist, aber ich habe alle Dokumente, um jede Aussage zu beweisen die ich mache – sie sagten: „Schau her. Du kannst diesen Krieg noch gewinnen. Du musst nicht aufgeben. Du musst den ausgehandelten Frieden, den dir Deutschland jetzt anbietet, nicht akzeptieren. Du kannst diesen Krieg gewinnen.“ wenn die Vereinigten Staaten als Ihr Verbündeter auftreten.“ Die Vereinigten Staaten befanden sich zu diesem Zeitpunkt nicht im Krieg. Wir waren frisch; wir waren jung; wir waren reich; wir waren mächtig. Sie sagten zu England: „Wir werden garantieren, dass wir die Vereinigten Staaten als Ihren Verbündeten in den Krieg ziehen und mit Ihnen auf Ihrer Seite kämpfen, wenn Sie uns Palästina versprechen, nachdem Sie den Krieg gewonnen haben.“ Mit anderen Worten, sie machten diesen Deal: „Wir werden die Vereinigten Staaten als Ihren Verbündeten in diesen Krieg ziehen. Der Preis, den Sie zahlen müssen, ist Palästina, nachdem Sie den Krieg gewonnen und Deutschland, Österreich-Ungarn und die Türkei besiegt haben.“ Jetzt hatte England das gleiche Recht, jedem Palästina zu versprechen, wie die Vereinigten Staaten Irland aus irgendeinem Grund Japan versprechen müssten. Es ist absolut absurd, dass Großbritannien, das nie eine Verbindung oder ein Interesse oder ein Recht auf das sogenannte Palästina hatte, es als Reichsmünze anbieten sollte, um die Zionisten dafür zu bezahlen, dass sie die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg gebracht haben. Allerdings gaben sie dieses Versprechen im Oktober 1916. Und kurz darauf – ich weiß nicht, wie viele sich hier daran erinnern – traten die Vereinigten Staaten, die fast ausschließlich deutschfreundlich eingestellt waren, als Verbündete Großbritanniens in den Krieg ein.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Ich sage, dass die Vereinigten Staaten fast völlig pro-deutsch waren, weil die Zeitungen hier von Juden kontrolliert wurden, die Bankiers Juden waren, alle Massenkommunikationsmedien in diesem Land von Juden kontrolliert wurden; und sie, die Juden, waren pro-deutsch. Sie waren pro-deutsch, weil viele von ihnen aus Deutschland kamen, und sie wollten auch, dass Deutschland den Zaren leckt. Die Juden mochten den Zaren nicht und wollten nicht, dass Russland diesen Krieg gewinnt. Diese deutsch-jüdischen Bankiers wie Kuhn Loeb und die anderen großen Bankhäuser in den Vereinigten Staaten weigerten sich, Frankreich oder England im Umfang eines Dollars zu finanzieren. Sie traten beiseite und sagten: „Solange Frankreich und England an Russland gebunden sind, keinen Cent!“ Aber sie pumpten Geld nach Deutschland, sie kämpften an der Seite Deutschlands gegen Russland und versuchten, das zaristische Regime zu schwächen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Als nun dieselben Juden die Möglichkeit sahen, Palästina zu bekommen, gingen sie nach England und machten diesen Deal. Damals änderte sich alles, wie eine Ampel, die von Rot auf Grün wechselt. Wo die Zeitungen alle pro-deutsch gewesen waren und dem Volk von den Schwierigkeiten erzählt hatten, die Deutschland im kommerziellen und anderen Kampf gegen Großbritannien hatte, waren die Deutschen plötzlich nicht mehr gut. Sie waren Bösewichte. Sie waren Hunnen. Sie erschossen Krankenschwestern des Roten Kreuzes. Sie schnitten Babys die Hände ab. Sie waren nicht gut. Kurz darauf erklärte Herr Wilson Deutschland den Krieg.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">WOODROW WILSON IST DER SELBE SCHEISSE, DER DEN JÜDISCHEN ROTHSCHILD-BANKERS ERLAUBT HAT, DIE USA ZU REGIEREN, INDEM SIE DIE „FEDERAL RESERVE“-BANK FALSCH ERSTELLTEN, UM IHR GELD ZU DRUCKEN!</span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXzy8UZ_JvC1n7lHFSm7VFAKMClEau7xGizeJUxRJ9RXiJqob1bsoDh2OezuidmdwjcCPINGl5fJRQB0qjZX8EYnMnHfRqy5lqZV26zGGydb_QwyYt36MKrUjhcqGFTA-XLJ9hmIarc0CeaEKYh3UOXPPpJwYMz33jp0iH1W7s0ckzaTDQgErKub5e/s640/WoodrowWilsonDestroysAmerica.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="619" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXzy8UZ_JvC1n7lHFSm7VFAKMClEau7xGizeJUxRJ9RXiJqob1bsoDh2OezuidmdwjcCPINGl5fJRQB0qjZX8EYnMnHfRqy5lqZV26zGGydb_QwyYt36MKrUjhcqGFTA-XLJ9hmIarc0CeaEKYh3UOXPPpJwYMz33jp0iH1W7s0ckzaTDQgErKub5e/w620-h640/WoodrowWilsonDestroysAmerica.jpg" width="620" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgddL_jMP9D-2-OUYYxJHaN8CBJD5Iqw3zkhtagRRhkOu6nhFykuZVkNA1gyJhvuN4WUEjYrKmMw6NrWCVXIV7OUwj6PCsQsFCnHaqs02AJPjHWf0Zat7ltDGXodnntfTLejRl_Yo7Nkbt2fijzAypJFVilQFvvBw37TMgKLt0T6gB_rJmwbmOVzDXR/s1034/WoodrowWilsonOnTheRothschildJews.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="354" data-original-width="1034" height="219" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgddL_jMP9D-2-OUYYxJHaN8CBJD5Iqw3zkhtagRRhkOu6nhFykuZVkNA1gyJhvuN4WUEjYrKmMw6NrWCVXIV7OUwj6PCsQsFCnHaqs02AJPjHWf0Zat7ltDGXodnntfTLejRl_Yo7Nkbt2fijzAypJFVilQFvvBw37TMgKLt0T6gB_rJmwbmOVzDXR/w640-h219/WoodrowWilsonOnTheRothschildJews.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></div><p><span style="font-size: large;">Die Zionisten in London hatten Telegramme in die Vereinigten Staaten geschickt, an Richter Brandeis, in denen es hieß: „Gehen Sie an die Arbeit für Präsident Wilson. Wir bekommen von England, was wir wollen. Jetzt gehen Sie an die Arbeit für Präsident Wilson und bringen Sie die Vereinigten Staaten in die Sache.“ Krieg." So sind die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg geraten. Wir hatten kein Interesse mehr daran; Wir hatten genauso wenig das Recht, darin zu sein, wie wir heute Nacht auf dem Mond sein müssen, anstatt in diesem Raum. Es gab absolut keinen Grund dafür, dass der Erste Weltkrieg unser Krieg sein sollte. Wir wurden in diesen Krieg hineingezogen – wenn ich vulgär sein darf, wurden wir hineingezogen –, nur damit die Zionisten der Welt Palästina erhalten konnten. Das ist etwas, was den Menschen in den Vereinigten Staaten nie gesagt wurde. Sie wussten nie, warum wir in den Ersten Weltkrieg eintraten.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Nachdem wir in den Krieg eingetreten waren, gingen die Zionisten nach Großbritannien und sagten: „Nun, wir haben unseren Teil der Vereinbarung erfüllt. Lassen Sie uns etwas schriftlich festhalten, das zeigt, dass Sie Ihre Abmachung einhalten und uns Palästina geben werden, nachdem Sie gewonnen haben.“ der Krieg." Sie wussten nicht, ob der Krieg noch ein Jahr oder weitere zehn Jahre dauern würde. Also fingen sie an, eine Quittung auszuarbeiten. Die Quittung bestand aus einem Brief, der in sehr kryptischer Sprache verfasst war, damit die Welt nicht wusste, worum es ging. Und das wurde die Balfour-Erklärung genannt.</span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTsRVAHJcdDfivL1tmEuxE5NtvKh7fnCDBoJMlhO-hQZSsmGolWiNdRnD4BNi8jVs3O9KQhBgKvj_YCoqTQCR1sOoDKwlNgMT4bb5ZLKnmIPS8c6OUKyo8J3ahA3jm4cI1o153rJDfGgYgvN80M1cDAtG-QX7Bty2ixLIMVnFMwnNsUXTRmHNiFIuD/s768/BalfourDeclaration.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="768" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTsRVAHJcdDfivL1tmEuxE5NtvKh7fnCDBoJMlhO-hQZSsmGolWiNdRnD4BNi8jVs3O9KQhBgKvj_YCoqTQCR1sOoDKwlNgMT4bb5ZLKnmIPS8c6OUKyo8J3ahA3jm4cI1o153rJDfGgYgvN80M1cDAtG-QX7Bty2ixLIMVnFMwnNsUXTRmHNiFIuD/s16000/BalfourDeclaration.jpg" /></span></a></div><div><span style="font-size: large;">Die Balfour-Erklärung war lediglich das Versprechen Großbritanniens, den Zionisten das zu zahlen, was sie als Gegenleistung für den Eintritt der Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg vereinbart hatten. Diese großartige Balfour-Erklärung, von der Sie so viel hören, ist also genauso falsch wie ein Drei-Dollar-Schein. Ich glaube nicht, dass ich es eindringlicher formulieren könnte.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;">Damit begann der ganze Ärger. Die Vereinigten Staaten sind in den Krieg eingestiegen. Die Vereinigten Staaten haben Deutschland vernichtet. Du weißt, was passiert ist. Als der Krieg endete und die Deutschen 1919 zur Pariser Friedenskonferenz nach Paris reisten, waren dort 117 Juden, eine Delegation, die die Juden vertrat, unter der Leitung von Bernard Baruch. Ich war dort: Ich sollte es wissen.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;">Was ist nun passiert? Die Juden sagten auf dieser Friedenskonferenz, als sie Deutschland zerstückelten und Europa an alle diese Nationen aufteilten, die ein Recht auf einen bestimmten Teil des europäischen Territoriums beanspruchten: „Wie wäre es mit Palästina für uns?“ Und sie haben zum ersten Mal nach Kenntnis der Deutschen diese Balfour-Erklärung vorgelegt. So erkannten die Deutschen zum ersten Mal: „Oh, das war das Spiel! Deshalb sind die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg eingetreten.“ Die Deutschen erkannten zum ersten Mal, dass sie besiegt waren, sie erlitten die gewaltigen Wiedergutmachungen, die ihnen aufgebrummt wurden, weil die Zionisten Palästina wollten und entschlossen waren, es um jeden Preis zu bekommen.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;">Das bringt uns zu einem weiteren sehr interessanten Punkt. Als die Deutschen das erkannten, ärgerten sie sich natürlich darüber. Bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt ging es den Juden in keinem Land der Welt besser als in Deutschland. Sie hatten Herrn Rathenau dort, der in der Industrie und im Finanzwesen vielleicht hundertmal so wichtig war wie Bernard Baruch in diesem Land. Sie hatten Herrn Balin, dem die beiden großen Dampfschifflinien, der Norddeutsche Lloyd und die Hamburg-Amerikanische Linie, gehörten. Sie hatten Herrn Bleichröder, den Bankier der Familie Hohenzollern. Es gab die Warburgs in Hamburg, die großen Handelsbankiers – die größten der Welt. Den Juden ging es in Deutschland sehr gut. Keine Frage. Die Deutschen meinten: „Na ja, das war ein ziemlicher Ausverkauf.“</span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;">Es war ein Ausverkauf, der mit dieser hypothetischen Situation verglichen werden könnte: Angenommen, die Vereinigten Staaten befänden sich im Krieg mit der Sowjetunion. Und wir haben gewonnen. Und wir sagten der Sowjetunion: „Nun, lasst uns aufhören. Wir bieten euch Friedensbedingungen. Vergessen wir die ganze Sache.“ Und plötzlich trat Rotchina als Verbündeter der Sowjetunion in den Krieg ein. Und sie in den Krieg zu werfen, führte zu unserer Niederlage. Eine vernichtende Niederlage mit Wiedergutmachungen, die sich die menschliche Vorstellungskraft nicht vorstellen kann. Stellen Sie sich also vor, dass wir nach dieser Niederlage herausfanden, dass es die Chinesen in diesem Land waren, und dass unsere chinesischen Bürger, von denen wir die ganze Zeit geglaubt hatten, dass sie loyale Bürger wären, die mit uns zusammenarbeiten, uns an die Sowjetunion verkauften und dass sie Durch sie wurde Rotchina in den Krieg gegen uns gebracht. Wie würden wir uns dann in den Vereinigten Staaten gegenüber den Chinesen fühlen? Ich glaube nicht, dass einer von ihnen es wagen würde, sein Gesicht auf irgendeiner Straße zu zeigen. Es gäbe nicht genügend praktische Laternenpfähle, um sich um sie zu kümmern. Stellen Sie sich vor, wie wir uns fühlen würden.</span></div><p><span style="font-size: large;">Nun, so empfanden die Deutschen diese Juden. Sie waren so nett zu ihnen gewesen: Von 1905 an, als die erste kommunistische Revolution in Russland scheiterte und die Juden aus Russland fliehen mussten, gingen sie alle nach Deutschland. Und Deutschland gewährte ihnen Zuflucht. Und sie wurden sehr nett behandelt. Und hier hatten sie Deutschland aus keinem anderen Grund verkauft als der Tatsache, dass sie Palästina als sogenanntes „jüdisches Gemeinwesen“ haben wollten.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Nun schrieben Nahum Sokolow und alle großen Führer und großen Namen, von denen Sie heute im Zusammenhang mit dem Zionismus lesen, in den Jahren 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922 und 1923 in all ihren Zeitungen – und die Presse war voll von ihren Erklärungen – dass die Gefühle gegen die Juden in Deutschland darauf zurückzuführen sind, dass sie erkannten, dass diese große Niederlage durch jüdische Fürsprache herbeigeführt wurde, indem sie die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg brachten. Das gaben die Juden selbst zu. Es war nicht so, dass die Deutschen 1919 herausfanden, dass ein Glas Judenblut besser schmeckte als Coca-Cola oder Münschner-Bier. Es gab kein religiöses Gefühl. Es gab keine Ressentiments gegen diese Menschen allein aufgrund ihres religiösen Glaubens. Es war alles politisch. Es war wirtschaftlich. Es war alles andere als religiös. In Deutschland kümmerte es niemanden, ob ein Jude nach Hause ging, die Jalousien herunterzog und „Shema 'Yisroel“ oder „Vater unser“ sagte. Niemand kümmerte sich in Deutschland mehr darum als in den Vereinigten Staaten. Nun war dieses Gefühl, das sich später in Deutschland entwickelte, auf eines zurückzuführen: Die Deutschen machten die Juden für ihre vernichtende Niederlage verantwortlich.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Und der Erste Weltkrieg war gegen Deutschland begonnen worden, ohne dass Deutschland dafür verantwortlich gewesen wäre. Sie hatten sich nichts schuldig gemacht. Nur darum, erfolgreich zu sein. Sie bauten eine große Marine auf. Sie bauten den Welthandel auf. Sie müssen bedenken, dass Deutschland zur Zeit der Französischen Revolution aus 300 kleinen Stadtstaaten, Fürstentümern, Herzogtümern usw. bestand. Dreihundert einzelne kleine politische Einheiten. Und zwischen dieser Zeit, zwischen der Zeit Napoleons und Bismarcks, wurden sie zu einem Staat zusammengefasst. Und innerhalb von 50 Jahren wurden sie zu einer der Großmächte der Welt. Ihre Marine konkurrierte mit der Großbritanniens, sie machten Geschäfte auf der ganzen Welt, sie konnten jeden unterbieten, sie konnten bessere Produkte herstellen. Was ist dadurch passiert?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Es gab eine Verschwörung zwischen England, Frankreich und Russland, um Deutschland niederzuschlagen. Es gibt keinen einzigen Historiker auf der Welt, der einen triftigen Grund dafür finden kann, warum diese drei Länder beschlossen haben, Deutschland politisch von der Landkarte zu tilgen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Als Deutschland erkannte, dass die Juden für seine Niederlage verantwortlich waren, empörten sie sich natürlich darüber. Aber keinem Juden kam ein Haar zu Schaden. Kein einziges Haar. Professor Tansill von der Georgetown University, der Zugang zu allen Geheimpapieren des Außenministeriums hatte, schrieb in seinem Buch und zitierte aus einem Dokument des Außenministeriums von Hugo Schoenfelt, einem Juden, den Cordell Hull 1933 nach Europa schickte, um das zu untersuchen sogenannten Lager für politische Gefangene, der zurück schrieb, dass er sie in sehr gutem Zustand vorfand. Sie waren in ausgezeichneter Verfassung und alle wurden gut behandelt. Und sie waren voller Kommunisten. Nun, viele von ihnen waren Juden, denn die Juden stellten damals etwa 98 Prozent der Kommunisten in Europa. Und es waren dort einige Priester und Pfarrer und Arbeiterführer und Freimaurer und andere, die internationale Verbindungen hatten.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Einige Hintergrundinformationen sind angebracht: In den Jahren 1918-1919 übernahmen die Kommunisten für einige Tage Bayern. Rosa Luxemburg und Karl Liebknecht übernahmen zusammen mit einer Gruppe anderer Juden für drei Tage die Regierung. Als der Kaiser den Krieg beendete, floh er tatsächlich nach Holland, weil er glaubte, dass die Kommunisten Deutschland wie Russland übernehmen würden und dass ihm das gleiche Schicksal widerfahren würde wie dem Zaren. Also floh er nach Holland, um Sicherheit zu suchen. Nachdem die kommunistische Bedrohung in Deutschland gebannt war, arbeiteten die Juden immer noch und versuchten, wieder in ihren früheren Status zurückzukehren, und die Deutschen bekämpften sie auf jede erdenkliche Weise, ohne irgendjemandem auch nur ein Haar zu krümmen. Sie bekämpften sie auf die gleiche Weise, wie in diesem Land die Prohibitionisten jeden bekämpften, der sich für Alkohol interessierte. Sie kämpften nicht mit Pistolen gegeneinander. Nun, das ist die Art und Weise, wie sie die Juden in Deutschland bekämpften. Und damals gab es wohlgemerkt 80 bis 90 Millionen Deutsche und nur 460.000 Juden. Etwa ein halbes Prozent der Bevölkerung Deutschlands waren Juden. Und doch kontrollierten sie die gesamte Presse und den größten Teil der Wirtschaft, weil sie bei der Abwertung der Mark mit billigem Geld hereingekommen waren und praktisch alles aufgekauft hatten.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Die Juden versuchten, diese Tatsache zu verheimlichen. Sie wollten nicht, dass die Welt wirklich versteht, dass sie Deutschland ausverkauft hatten und dass die Deutschen das verübelten.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Die Deutschen gingen entsprechend gegen die Juden vor. Sie haben sie, soll ich sagen, diskriminiert, wo immer sie konnten. Sie haben sie gemieden. Genauso würden wir die Chinesen oder die Neger oder die Katholiken oder jeden in diesem Land meiden, der uns an einen Feind verkauft und unsere Niederlage herbeigeführt hat.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Nach einer Weile beriefen die Juden der Welt ein Treffen in Amsterdam ein. Juden aus allen Ländern der Welt nahmen an diesem Treffen im Juli 1933 teil. Und sie sagten zu Deutschland: „Ihr feuert Hitler ab und bringt jeden Juden wieder in seine frühere Position zurück, ob er Kommunist war oder was auch immer er war. Das können Sie.“ Behandle uns nicht so. Und wir, die Juden der Welt, stellen dir ein Ultimatum.“ Sie können sich vorstellen, was die Deutschen ihnen erzählt haben. Was also taten die Juden?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Als Deutschland sich 1933 weigerte, sich der Weltkonferenz der Juden in Amsterdam zu ergeben, löste sich die Konferenz auf und Herr Samuel Untermyer, der Leiter der amerikanischen Delegation und Präsident der gesamten Konferenz, kam in die Vereinigten Staaten und ging vom Dampfer in die Studios des Columbia Broadcasting Systems und sendete eine Radiosendung durch die Vereinigten Staaten, in der er tatsächlich sagte: „Die Juden der Welt erklären jetzt einen Heiligen Krieg gegen Deutschland. Wir befinden uns jetzt in einem heiligen Konflikt.“ gegen die Deutschen. Und wir werden sie aushungern, bis sie kapitulieren. Wir werden einen weltweiten Boykott gegen sie verüben. Das wird sie zerstören, weil sie von ihrem Exportgeschäft abhängig sind.“</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Und es ist eine Tatsache, dass zwei Drittel der deutschen Lebensmittelversorgung importiert werden mussten und diese nur mit den Erlösen der Exporte importiert werden konnten. Wenn Deutschland also nicht exportieren könnte, müssten zwei Drittel der deutschen Bevölkerung verhungern. Es gab einfach nicht genug Nahrung für mehr als ein Drittel der Bevölkerung. In dieser Erklärung, die ich hier habe und die am 7. August 1933 in der New York Times abgedruckt wurde, erklärte Herr Samuel Untermyer mutig: „Dieser Wirtschaftsboykott ist unser Mittel zur Selbstverteidigung. Präsident Roosevelt hat seinen Einsatz befürwortet.“ in der National Recovery Administration“, an die sich einige von Ihnen vielleicht erinnern, wo jeder boykottiert werden sollte, es sei denn, er befolgte die Regeln des New Deal, und das wurde vom damaligen Obersten Gerichtshof für verfassungswidrig erklärt. Dennoch erklärten die Juden der Welt einen Boykott gegen Deutschland, und dieser war so effektiv, dass man in keinem Geschäft auf der Welt etwas finden konnte, auf dem „Made in Germany“ stand. Tatsächlich erzählte mir ein leitender Angestellter der Woolworth Company, dass sie Geschirr und Geschirr im Wert von mehreren Millionen Dollar in den Fluss werfen mussten; dass ihre Geschäfte boykottiert wurden, wenn jemand hereinkam und ein Gericht mit der Aufschrift „Made in Germany“ fand, sie wurden mit Schildern mit der Aufschrift „Hitler“, „Mörder“ usw. demonstriert, so etwas wie diese Sitzstreiks, die dort stattfinden Süd.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In einem Laden der Kette R. H. Macy, die von einer ebenfalls jüdischen Familie namens Strauss geführt wurde, fand eine Frau dort Strümpfe aus Chemnitz mit der Aufschrift „Made in Germany“. Nun ja, es waren Baumwollstrümpfe, und vielleicht gibt es sie schon seit 20 Jahren, da ich die Beine von Frauen schon seit vielen Jahren beobachte und es schon lange her ist, dass ich Baumwollstrümpfe an ihnen gesehen habe. Ich sah, wie Macy's boykottiert wurde, wie Hunderte von Menschen mit Schildern mit der Aufschrift „Mörder“, „Hitler“ usw. herumliefen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt war in Deutschland noch keinem Juden ein einziges Haar gebrochen worden. Es gab kein Leid, es gab keinen Hunger, es gab keinen Mord, es gab nichts.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Natürlich sagten die Deutschen: „Wer sind diese Leute, die einen Boykott gegen uns verkünden, alle unsere Leute arbeitslos machen und unsere Industrien zum Stillstand bringen? Wer sind sie, die uns das antun?“ Sie ärgerten sich natürlich darüber. Sicherlich haben sie Hakenkreuze auf Geschäfte gemalt, die Juden gehörten. Warum sollte ein Deutscher hineingehen und sein Geld einem Ladenbesitzer geben, der Teil eines Boykotts war, der Deutschland aushungern und dazu zwingen würde, sich den Juden der Welt zu ergeben, die diktieren würden, wer ihr Ministerpräsident oder Kanzler sein sollte? Nun, es war lächerlich.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Der Boykott dauerte noch einige Zeit, aber erst 1938, als ein junger Jude aus Polen die deutsche Botschaft in Paris betrat und einen deutschen Beamten erschoss, begannen die Deutschen, mit den Juden in Deutschland richtig hart umzugehen. Und man hat sie dann dabei erwischt, wie sie Fenster einschlugen, Straßenschlägereien veranstalteten und so weiter.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Nun, ich verwende das Wort „Antisemitismus“ nicht gern, weil es bedeutungslos ist, aber es bedeutet Ihnen trotzdem etwas, also muss ich es verwenden. Der einzige Grund, warum es in Deutschland Gefühle gegen Juden gab, war, dass sie für den Ersten Weltkrieg und diesen weltweiten Boykott verantwortlich waren. Letztendlich waren sie auch für den Zweiten Weltkrieg verantwortlich, denn nachdem die Sache außer Kontrolle geraten war, war es für die Juden und Deutschland absolut notwendig, sich einen Krieg zu liefern, um zu sehen, wer überleben würde. In der Zwischenzeit hatte ich in Deutschland gelebt und wusste, dass die Deutschen beschlossen hatten, dass Europa christlich oder kommunistisch sein würde: Es gibt kein Dazwischen. Und die Deutschen entschieden, dass sie es möglichst christlich halten würden. Und sie begannen mit der Neubewaffnung. Im November 1933 erkannten die Vereinigten Staaten die Sowjetunion an. Die Sowjetunion wurde immer mächtiger und Deutschland erkannte, dass „wir bald an der Reihe sein würden, wenn wir nicht stark sind.“ Das Gleiche, was wir in diesem Land heute sagen: „Wir werden bald an der Reihe sein, es sei denn, wir sind stark.“ Unsere Regierung gibt 83 bis 84 Milliarden Dollar für die Verteidigung aus. Verteidigung gegen wen? Verteidigung gegen 40.000 kleine Juden in Moskau, die Russland übernahmen und dann auf ihre hinterlistige Art und Weise die Kontrolle über viele andere Länder der Welt übernahmen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Dass dieses Land jetzt am Rande eines Dritten Weltkriegs steht, aus dem wir nicht als Sieger hervorgehen können, übersteigt meine Vorstellungskraft. Ich weiß, dass Atombomben in Megatonnen gemessen werden. Eine Megatonne ist eine Bezeichnung für eine Million Tonnen TNT. Unsere Atombomben hatten bei ihrer Entwicklung eine Kapazität von 10 Megatonnen oder 10 Millionen Tonnen TNT. Jetzt haben die Atombomben, die entwickelt werden, eine Kapazität von 200 Megatonnen, und Gott weiß, wie viele Megatonnen die Atombomben der Sowjetunion haben.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Was erwartet uns jetzt? Wenn wir einen Weltkrieg auslösen, der sich zu einem Atomkrieg entwickeln könnte, ist die Menschheit am Ende. Warum könnte ein solcher Krieg stattfinden? Es wird stattfinden, während sich der Vorhang für Akt 3 hebt: Akt 1 war der Erste Weltkrieg, Akt 2 war der Zweite Weltkrieg, Akt 3 wird der Dritte Weltkrieg sein. Die Juden der Welt, die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensbrüder überall sind entschlossen, die Vereinigten Staaten erneut zu nutzen, um Palästina dauerhaft als Stützpunkt ihrer Weltregierung zu behalten. Das ist genauso wahr, wie ich hier stehe. Nicht nur ich habe es gelesen, sondern viele hier haben es auch gelesen, und es ist auf der ganzen Welt bekannt.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Was werden wir machen? Das Leben, das Sie retten, könnte das Ihres Sohnes sein. Vielleicht sind Ihre Jungs heute Abend auf dem Weg in diesen Krieg; Und Sie wissen es genauso wenig wie Sie wussten, dass die Zionisten 1916 in London einen Deal mit dem britischen Kriegskabinett abgeschlossen haben, um Ihre Söhne in den Krieg in Europa zu schicken. Wussten Sie es damals? Kein Mensch in den Vereinigten Staaten wusste es. Du durftest es nicht wissen. Wer wusste es? Präsident Wilson wusste es. Colonel House wusste es. Andere Insider wussten es.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Wusste ich es? Ich hatte eine ziemlich gute Vorstellung davon, was vor sich ging: Ich war Verbindungsmann zu Henry Morgenthau Sr. im Wahlkampf 1912, als Präsident Wilson gewählt wurde, und im dortigen Büro gab es Gespräche. Ich war der „vertrauliche Mann“ von Henry Morgenthau sen., dem Vorsitzenden des Finanzausschusses, und ich war der Verbindungsmann zwischen ihm und Rollo Wells, dem Schatzmeister. Also saß ich bei diesen Treffen mit Präsident Wilson am Kopfende des Tisches und all den anderen, und ich hörte, wie sie Präsident Wilson die abgestufte Einkommenssteuer und das, was zur Federal Reserve geworden ist, ins Gehirn trommelten, und ich hörte, wie sie ihn damit indoktrinierten Zionistische Bewegung.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Richter Brandeis und Präsident Wilson standen sich genauso nahe wie die beiden Finger dieser Hand. Präsident Woodrow Wilson war ebenso inkompetent, wenn es darum ging, festzustellen, was als Neugeborenes vor sich ging. So brachten sie uns in den Ersten Weltkrieg, während wir alle schliefen. Sie schickten unsere Jungen dorthin, um sie abzuschlachten. Wofür? So können die Juden Palästina als ihr „Commonwealth“ haben. Sie haben dich so sehr getäuscht, dass du nicht weißt, ob du kommst oder gehst.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Nun sagt jeder Richter, wenn er eine Jury anklagt: „Meine Herren, jeder Zeuge, von dem Sie finden, dass er auch nur eine einzige Lüge erzählt hat, Sie können seine gesamte Aussage außer Acht lassen.“ Ich weiß nicht, aus welchem Bundesstaat Sie kommen, aber im Bundesstaat New York spricht ein Richter so zu einer Jury. Wenn dieser Zeuge gelogen hat, ignorieren Sie seine Aussage.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Was sind die Fakten über die Juden?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Wissen Sie, was Juden am Versöhnungstag tun, der ihnen Ihrer Meinung nach so heilig ist? Ich war einer von ihnen. Das ist kein Hörensagen. Ich bin nicht hier, um ein Hetzer zu sein. Ich bin hier, um Ihnen Fakten zu liefern. Wenn Sie am Versöhnungstag eine Synagoge betreten, stehen Sie schon beim ersten Gebet auf, das Sie sprechen. Es ist das einzige Gebet, für das Sie stehen. Sie wiederholen dreimal ein kurzes Gebet namens Kol Nidre.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In diesem Gebet gehen Sie eine Vereinbarung mit Gott, dem Allmächtigen, ein, dass jeder Eid, Gelübde oder Versprechen, das Sie in den nächsten zwölf Monaten leisten, null und nichtig ist. Der Eid soll kein Eid sein; das Gelübde soll kein Gelübde sein; das Pfand soll kein Pfand sein. Sie haben keine Kraft oder Wirkung. Darüber hinaus lehrt der Talmud, dass Sie bei jedem Eid, Gelübde oder Versprechen an das Kol Nidre-Gebet denken müssen, das Sie am Versöhnungstag gesprochen haben, und von der Erfüllung dieser Gebete befreit sind.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Wie sehr können Sie sich auf ihre Loyalität verlassen? Auf ihre Loyalität können Sie sich ebenso verlassen wie die Deutschen im Jahr 1916. Wir werden das gleiche Schicksal erleiden wie Deutschland, und aus dem gleichen Grund. </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman</a></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-38162406090588041012024-01-07T03:43:00.000-08:002024-01-07T03:43:27.122-08:00 A Jewish Defector Warns America<p><b><span style="font-size: large;">THEY WON'T LET THIS ONE STAY UP FOR LONG, SO DL IT WHILE YOU CAN!</span></b></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> A Jewish Defector Warns America</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> Introductory Note</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Benjamin Freedman Speaks:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">WOODROW WILSON IS THE VERY SAME SHIT WHO ALLOWED THE BANKSTERS TO RULE THE USA BY MISCREATING THE FED!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">;-(</span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpJNwAfVirEk0NBdAVsS8FQXucTftY3WB-5_KtcsNSKCIyBgPYzkecsaR7Ebjqb3OIKIEHkW1iuwUiH09YTJZIP25zFqzY1tpLnN62pEiJZBWGnUm15NYfA0M0GX2HNRePUR_EvRPB2xviEXhHSKKGwDPd25ReJxDGfulkKwIxuH6ZccZdmZHvMKk_/s640/WoodrowWilsonDestroysAmerica.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="619" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpJNwAfVirEk0NBdAVsS8FQXucTftY3WB-5_KtcsNSKCIyBgPYzkecsaR7Ebjqb3OIKIEHkW1iuwUiH09YTJZIP25zFqzY1tpLnN62pEiJZBWGnUm15NYfA0M0GX2HNRePUR_EvRPB2xviEXhHSKKGwDPd25ReJxDGfulkKwIxuH6ZccZdmZHvMKk_/s16000/WoodrowWilsonDestroysAmerica.jpg" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxflCiaIjhKCzmrFOZR_ETd8hzbS5UwXWFgZZfegaGbd-b3WtvYKFhnIjHvvM5L2j9opZv5Z-pLJSo4UuLN14S9EOkaznZEjtGVhNwx_bCIHNY1KfNjfO2oldCl3HHBqFNnwP7kahEJovBjNBKkOGqAorQKmzVvh-_wxzqZjU7_6z2IuZszCR6fDa0/s1034/WoodrowWilsonOnTheRothschildJews.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="354" data-original-width="1034" height="219" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxflCiaIjhKCzmrFOZR_ETd8hzbS5UwXWFgZZfegaGbd-b3WtvYKFhnIjHvvM5L2j9opZv5Z-pLJSo4UuLN14S9EOkaznZEjtGVhNwx_bCIHNY1KfNjfO2oldCl3HHBqFNnwP7kahEJovBjNBKkOGqAorQKmzVvh-_wxzqZjU7_6z2IuZszCR6fDa0/w640-h219/WoodrowWilsonOnTheRothschildJews.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.</span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcdmqv8YFBKhbXY6X2_U78WZFR4MIFUGyZGEg-lFc4Wd2IGLlCDMqgq_Cbz1cbRcAy0tOZkMBy0r-AgRBEgndmr8049_RO9HOQVHn5HZ5J9zop-zr3XHeudFILOfwOp3M9wyE9OagNiXisTZcxfxZSHC-xTeFO96vlyIGc5eO5THDBjSeSFCqS4mgl/s768/BalfourDeclaration.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="768" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcdmqv8YFBKhbXY6X2_U78WZFR4MIFUGyZGEg-lFc4Wd2IGLlCDMqgq_Cbz1cbRcAy0tOZkMBy0r-AgRBEgndmr8049_RO9HOQVHn5HZ5J9zop-zr3XHeudFILOfwOp3M9wyE9OagNiXisTZcxfxZSHC-xTeFO96vlyIGc5eO5THDBjSeSFCqS4mgl/s16000/BalfourDeclaration.jpg" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"> Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">What are the facts about the Jews? </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason</span>. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman</a></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-14131999790100455112023-12-29T13:40:00.000-08:002024-01-03T03:20:19.323-08:00"PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE" CENSORSHIP AND BOOK-BURNING CONFISCATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI LOBBY COME TO CANADA!<p><b><span style="font-size: large;">"PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE" CENSORSHIP COMES TO CANADA BY WAY OF AND IN DEFENSE OF ONLY THE FOREIGN NATION OF ISRAEL'S JEWS!</span></b></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">That old trope about how the "Road to Hell is paved with good intentions!" means THIS in real life:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Crime is defined as intentionally attacking thereby innocent others first.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"Crime prevention" is attacking thereby innocent other people first, too.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">i.e: "We must arrest you to stop you from committing the crimes you have yet to commit! Only when everyone is safely locked up, will we finally achieve 'peace!' Always trade risky freedom for safe security (aka slavery)! </span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">(SO: DON'T THINK; JUST OBEY US)!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Whee!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">DITTO FOR ALL 'PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE' "HARM PREVENTION" MEASURES: THEY ARE CRIMES!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Since subjectively responsibility-averse libertine "Liberal" criminal leftopaths don't trust them selves to abide by any agreements, they also won't trust anyone else to, either, and so try to impose force by "governing" (defrauding enslaving and destroying) others' lives, to protect only them selves from us.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>But in general, no force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can (or will) govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who </span><span>CANNOT </span><span>(or will not) govern themselves. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">These non-law guidelines for the Canadian Border Security Agents to confiscate books Jews deem "hateful!" from Canadian importers were drafted in 2017 under the compromised and corrupted globalist Trudeau regime.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Canadian government is inducing its Border Security Agents to commit sedition against we the Canadian people, who are the real owners of this country, in order to forbid us from Noticing and prevent us from telling others about their crimes committed against us on behalf of the foreign Nation of Israel and its Rothschild bankster owners by inflicting their own self-hating anti-goyim Jewish "hate propaganda" on us!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In other words, they are, as all criminals do, accusing us of the very same crimes they commit against us!</span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhh1XR9DZZOxHUUfGfxNEVCPT79do3xBnHxogH0wjI4RpDbXhIlikTicCihjpAEQNpeTr8XuSpMJv_qyYms3Wis0PsiS1zbaPXSp0_GvvpL7FkPqDjLZ85f7uWNs08ZJzOjfvwGoAJ85HHAO14DRNiUxXkDWhE3ml0KHQK61RPKD8z31zaQse9Ls-Pb/s568/PsychoDetectingTP.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="284" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhh1XR9DZZOxHUUfGfxNEVCPT79do3xBnHxogH0wjI4RpDbXhIlikTicCihjpAEQNpeTr8XuSpMJv_qyYms3Wis0PsiS1zbaPXSp0_GvvpL7FkPqDjLZ85f7uWNs08ZJzOjfvwGoAJ85HHAO14DRNiUxXkDWhE3ml0KHQK61RPKD8z31zaQse9Ls-Pb/s16000/PsychoDetectingTP.jpeg" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Here's an official memo to "their" (our) CBSA enforcement agents, referencing Canada's </span><span><span style="font-size: medium;">ANTI-HATE-SPEECH "LAWS:"</span> </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">(And by it's description of verboten topics, it's pretty easy to see (((who))) it was obviously very specifically written to protect the alleged hurt feelings of, too)!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">This was drafted to for Canada Customs and Border Security Agency (CBSA) teams to restrict imports of books and thereby deprive citizens of their freedom of thought rights and of free speech. As you can see, they are Hell-bent on trying to make sure nobody is allowed to Notice and complain about how these things are really happening!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">From here: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.html</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<b>D Memoranda" D9-1-15</b>:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<b>Guidelines and General Information:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Uniqueness of Hate Propaganda, Sedition and Treason Decisions in the Canada Border Services Agency’s (CBSA) Mandate</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">1. In the course of administering the many laws of Parliament that regulate, control or prohibit the importation of goods into Canada, CBSA officials deal with a wide range of goods.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">2. Importation of certain categories of goods is prohibited under Customs Tariff item 9899.00.00. One category under tariff item 9899.00.00 involves material that is suspected of constituting hate propaganda, sedition or treason as defined in subsections 46(2), 59(4) and 320(8) of the Criminal Code. The Customs Tariff prohibits the importation of such material into Canada, including written, visual and audio materials.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>3. </span><b>Unlike many other goods routinely dealt with by CBSA officials, expressive materials have been found by </b><b>the courts to be protected by the freedom of expression guarantee set out in subsection 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span><u>Although not specifically tested in the courts to date</u><span>, </span></span><b>it is </b><b>believed </b><span>(by whom is not mentioned; presumably only them selves)</span><span><b> that, in respect to hate propaganda, sedition and treason, as with obscenity, the infringement of </b><b>section 2(b) of the Charter is justified</b></span><span> under its own section 1, because the overriding objective of the law is the avoidance of harm to society and that is a sufficiently substantial concern to warrant a restriction on freedom of expression."</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">GET IT? THEY PRETEND TO "BELIEVE" THAT </span><span style="font-size: large;">THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND</span><span style="font-size: large;"> AND</span><span style="font-size: large;"> ADMITTEDLY EVEN WITHOUT LEGAL JUSTIFICATION, SHOULD BE <i>INFRINGED</i> BY THEM BECAUSE THEIR OWN SUBJECTIVE, LITERALLY AND SPECIFICALLY EMOTIONS-DRIVEN OPINIONS CONCERNING WHAT IS AND IS NOT YOUR "HATE," IS GOOD ENOUGH TO INFRINGE YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CHARTER RIGHT IN ORDER TO AVOID SOME SORT OF NEBULOUS "HARM TO SOCIETY!" CLEARLY, THIS ASSERTION IS ITSELF SEDITION, AS IT PRETEND TO JUSTIFY WITHOUT ACT OF PARLIAMENT OR BY EVEN BOTHERING TO HAVE ANY DULY-ELECTED OFFICIALS OF ANY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - WHETHER PROVINCIAL OR EVEN MUNICIPAL - TO ATTEMPT TO DULY LEGISLATE, EVEN BY INVOKING THE CONSTITUTION'S OWN "NOTWITHSTANDING" CLAUSE, ANY LAW/S TO JUSTIFY THAT, ONLY BY SPECIFICALLY AND LITERALLY "INFRINGING" THE HIGHEST LAW OF THE LAND, CAN THEY EMPOWER THEM SELVES ALONE TO "AVOID HARM TO SOCIETY" BY RESTRICTING THE CITIZENS' FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">GET IT? "ONLY BY INFRINGING THE LAW CAN WE OURSELVES ENFORCE IT!"<br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">THE IMPLICATION HERE IS, THAT BY MERELY BEING EXPOSED TO OTHERS' CALLS TO INCITE VIOLENCE, THE CITIZENS WILL AUTOMATICALLY AND INSTANTLY BECOME MINDLESSLY VIOLENT BECAUSE WE CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO THINK ON OUR OWN, AND OUR ACTIONS ARE ALL DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Naturally, this also means that, as is usual, you and I are being pre-judged guilty of spreading "Hate Propaganda" merely by reading it - even before the National Socialist history book you ordered online has arrived from another country for you to have been able to make up your own mind as to the nature of its contents!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9VrOQMn5BXJQrHtR8S1mex7LTog2Od0qf6hBEQcwj9qxlV7OUHba-4GrtREysV6nH19DCYV5zFFoR7mWThVu6BTl7H5t3dHvtB3b_BH66ioac8ZEqRMcwdOEhxKs2mgrsjxvZImpM7BzPnGnKa42zmol7_nm7LsLPr5TJTj5PxTsWJUyrCu4bFu_r/s1023/SS-CultureBookOrderDescription.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="774" data-original-width="1023" height="492" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9VrOQMn5BXJQrHtR8S1mex7LTog2Od0qf6hBEQcwj9qxlV7OUHba-4GrtREysV6nH19DCYV5zFFoR7mWThVu6BTl7H5t3dHvtB3b_BH66ioac8ZEqRMcwdOEhxKs2mgrsjxvZImpM7BzPnGnKa42zmol7_nm7LsLPr5TJTj5PxTsWJUyrCu4bFu_r/w650-h492/SS-CultureBookOrderDescription.jpg" width="650" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p><span style="font-size: large;">From memo 15:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">From here: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.html</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<b>Preliminary Examination:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">10. During the initial examination of suspect goods, CBSA officials must scan for ... the targeting of an identifiable group (hate propaganda). </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Determining Whether Goods are Hate Propaganda:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Goods that constitute hate propaganda under the Criminal Code are those that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate or promote genocide or that publicly incite or willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">SO WE ARE TO BE AUTOMATICALLY SLANDERED IN ADVANCE BY BEING PRESUMED GUILTY OF "PROMOTING HATRED" (AN EMOTIONAL EFFECT, NOT AN AUTOMATIC CAUSE OF VIOLENCE) AGAINST ANY GROUP WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY, BASED ON OUR OWN BRAINS' ABILITY TO DETECT PATTERNS, SUCH AS THAT A CERTAIN RELIGION PROMOTES A CERTAIN RACIAL GROUP OR ETHNICITY AS BEING SO INHERENTLY SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHERS THAT THEY ARE LITERALLY "AS GODS" IN COMPARISON TO THE OTHERS, WHO WERE MERELY CREATED BY THEIR OWN GOD "AS BEASTS" TO SERVE THEM AS SLAVES IN ALL WAYS, INCLUDING BY THEREBY ALLOWING THEM SELVES TO RAPE US, (INCLUDING OUR CHILDREN) TO ROB AND KILL US AT WILL, AND EVEN EAT US, WITHOUT ANY MORAL OR LEGAL CONSEQUENCES WHAT SO EVER. THE IMPLICATION HERE IS THAT EVERYONE ELSE, OF ALL RACES etc., MUST IGNORE CONDONE AND EVEN CELEBRATE THESE THREATS AGAINST US, RATHER THAN "ILLEGALLY" FEAR AND "HATE" THEM AS INHERENTLY EXISTENTIAL CRIMINAL THREATS TO GENOCIDE US!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Goods may be prohibited as hate propaganda if they advocate or promote the genocide of an identifiable group. Genocide is defined as acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group, either by killing members of the group or by deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">THE JEWS' OWN TALMUD IS THUS ITSELF DEFINED AS "HATE PROPAGANDA" AS BY ENSLAVING ROBBING RAPING KILLING AND EATING OUR CHILDREN, THE JEWS WHO WROTE IT AND ENDORSE IT AS HOLY, INCITE OUR GENOCIDE!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">8. Goods that incite or promote hatred against an identifiable group, by incorporating some or all of the following allegations, may be prohibited as hate propaganda:</span></p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">(a) allegations that an identifiable group is to blame for serious economic or social problems;</span></b></p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">(b) allegations that an identifiable group manipulates media, trade, finance, government or world politics to the detriment of society;</span></b></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>(c) allegations that an identifiable group is</b> inferior or <b>superior to another group</b>; and/or</span></p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">(d) allegations that an identifiable group weakens or threatens society, in whole or in part.</span></b></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Well, isn't that strangely (and suspiciously) specific!</span></p><p><span><span style="font-size: x-large;">It's hard to imagine that if someone was a racist prejudiced against </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Black people in general, their first instinct would be to express that "hate" with the bizarre propaganda notion </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">that, say, the inhabitants or governments of Chad, Sudan, or Nigeria had somehow taken over and were </span><span><span style="font-size: large;">actively engaged in manipulating our media and financial banking system to corrupt our politicians and threaten society </span><span style="font-size: medium;">LOL!</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>It's also not the first thing we would think to accuse even another ethnically "White" group, say, the Swedes, of doing, had we some sort of inexplicably prejudicial "hatred" of them and their meatballs!</span></span></p><p><span><span style="font-size: medium;">IT IS ALSO NOTABLE THAT THE JEWS' OWN TALMUD, IN ATTEMPTING TO JUSTIFY THE GENOCIDE OF ALL NON-JEWS, SIMPLY ASSERTS THAT THEIR OWN GOD DELIBERATELY CREATED US TO BE INFERIOR TO THEM, AND DOES NOT IN ANY WAY PRETEND THAT WE THREATEN THEM BY CAUSING THEM ANY SERIOUS ECONOMIC PROBLEMS TO WEAKEN ANY SOCIETIES' TRADE BY DINT OF MANIPULATING FINANCE TO SUBVERT THE WORLD'S GOVERNMENT POLITICS TO THEIR DETRIMENT; IN STEAD, THEIR BIBLE ITSELF OPENLY AND CLEARLY ASSERTS THAT THEIR OWN GOD COMMANDS THEY DO IT TO US!</span></span></p><p><u><span style="font-size: large;">So, obviously, this can believably refer to only ONE very specific group</span></u><span style="font-size: large;"> - the Israeli Jews, especially the Rothschilds and their Israeli Jewish minions.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Yet also under the "exceptions" part of these their non-laws, the truth is supposedly a defense, and as we all know, the Israeli Jews themselves openly brag about owning the world through their banks, and of owning the global media through the five Jewish corporations which own them all.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>Further, not only has the Rothschild Jew scion Klaus Schwab, </span><span>CEO</span><span> of their World Economic Forum, openly bragged about how the members of his "Young Global Leaders" school, specifying Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Adern as his exemplars, "penetrated the cabinets of world governments," but the very existence of this Canadian Border Security Agent Memo itself, as it has been openly and proudly designed to specifically deprive Canadian citizens of their freedom of expression Charter rights, proves the success of his plan!</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">So these politicians and their Customs and Revenue Agency border guard minions are openly engaged in the very same seditious Jewish anti-goyim "hate propaganda"-based activities they are pretending to prevent! </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And it's being done on behalf of a group which promotes its self as superior - Divinely Chosen, even - to any and all other groups, and by which we non-Jewish goys are, by their own Talmudic definitions, so inferior as to amount to nothing but beasts of burden in human form, to be enslaved, raped, killed and even eaten at will by them.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"Luckily," (for them) though, this memo also excuses such behavior on its very own religions claims grounds - so, since the Jews have declared "God told us to commit these crimes!" they aren't really crimes at all!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Whee!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<b>Determining Whether Goods are Seditious:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">9. Goods that are of a seditious character are, for example, goods that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate the use of force, without the authority of law, as a means of accomplishing governmental change within Canada.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">OBVIOUSLY, THE JEWS, BY DIRECTLY INFLUENCING THE CREATION OF SUCH DOCUMENTS AS THESE VERY MEMORANDA, HAVE CREATED "GOODS" WHICH BENEFIT ONLY THEM SELVES, BY DESCRIBING CANADIANS WHO DARE TO NOTICE THESE PATTERNS, AS "HATEFUL!" </span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">AND WHOSE RIGHTS ARE TO BE DEPRIVED BY THE FORCEFUL CONFISCATION OF THE INFORMATION THEY NEED - BY IN EFFECT DESTROYING AND HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR CRIMES - COMMIT SEDITION AGAINST CANADIAN CITIZENS BY PERPETUATING THE PERPETRATION OF THEIR ALREADY-ACCOMPLISHED GOVERNMENTAL CHANGE IN CANADA FROM A GOVERNMENT OF AND BY THE CANADIAN PEOPLE TO ONE OF BY AND FOR THE FOREIGN ISRAELI JEWISH BANKSTERS!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<b>Defences and Exceptions:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">11. Goods that may constitute hate propaganda, through their willful promotion of hatred, will not be classified under tariff item 9899.00.00 if the goods are found to:</span></p><p><span><span style="font-size: x-large;">(a) communicate statements that are established to be true;</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span><span style="font-size: medium;">("BUT IF NOT YET PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW TO BE TRUE, WE WILL SEIZE ALL EVIDENCE OF SAME IN ADVANCE AND DESTROY IT, IN ORDER TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING USED TO PROVE THEM TRUE)!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(b) predominately express, in good faith, an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;</span></p><p><span><span style="font-size: x-large;">i.e:</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span><span style="font-size: medium;">"BUT STILL, IT'S ILLEGAL , AS JEWISH CRIMES AREN'T REALLY CRIMES BECAUSE THEY SAY THEIR OWN G*D TOLD THEM TO COMMIT THEM! WHEE!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(c) be relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which is for the public benefit and, on reasonable grounds, are believed to be true; or</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">BUT STILL, THE CBSA'S OWN PROPERTY-SEIZING LEGISLATION INHERENTLY CONTRADICTS ITSELF BY PREVENTING THIS DISCUSSION!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(d) be intended, in good faith, to point out, for the purposes of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span>BUT THIS SHOULD LOGICALLY BE DETERMINED BY THE SEQUENTIAL PROCESS OF FIRST PART </span><span><span>(</span>c)</span><span> </span><span> (AND THEN </span><span>(a)</span><span> (ABOVE)! AND AS THEY HEREBY PERMIT THEM SELVES TO INFRINGE OUR HIGHEST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, IN ORDER TO "PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFEND SOCIETY" FROM THE HARM OF BEING ABLE TO READ THE ALLEGED "HATE PROPAGANDA" BY SEIZING IT BEFORE IT CAN BE READ AND ANALYZED, THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THESE MEMOS DEPRIVES US OF ANY ABILITY TO POINT OUT, FOR PURPOSES OF REMOVING IT FROM ANY DOUBT, AND THUS FOREARMING SOCIETY AGAINST FUTURE MISAPPREHENDED AND UNCHALLENGED BELIEF IN ITS UNJUSTIFIABLY "HATEFUL" NATURE (THE WHOLE IMPLICATION OF THIS MEMO BEING THAT NO KIND OF HATE IS EVER GOOD, EVEN AS THEY HATEFULLY MADE ALL HATE INTO A CRIME TO FORBID US FROM HATING CRIMES AND THE CRIMINALS WHO COMMIT THEM) BY ATTEMPTING TO DESTROY BY DINT OF ITS PHYSICAL REMOVAL, THE VERY EVIDENCE OF ITS OWN ALLEGED HATE!</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">12. Similarly, goods that may constitute sedition will not be classified under tariff item 9899.00.00 if the goods are found to have only the intention, in good faith to:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(a) show that Her Majesty has been misled or mistaken in her measures;</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">(FOR INSTANCE, BY ALLOWING THESE MEMORANDA TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE)!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(b) point out errors or defects in the government or constitution of Canada or a province, in the Parliament or the legislature or a province, or in the administration of justice in Canada;</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">SUCH AS HOW THE CABINETS OF BOTH CANADA'S FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED (OR "PENETRATED") BY <u>WEF</u>-TRAINED "YOUNG GLOBAL LEADER" TRAITORS? OR SIMPLY BY DINT OF SUCH MEMOS AS THESE, WHICH DESTROY EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED HATE-INCITING PROPAGANDA CRIMES BEFORE IT CAN BE READ AND ASSESSED?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(c) procure, by lawful means, the alteration of any matter of government in Canada; or</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(d) point out, for the purposes or removal, matters that produce or tend to produce feelings of hostility or ill-will between different classes of persons in Canada.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">YES, THE JEWS, WHO BY THE VERY EXISTENTIAL DEFINITION OF THEIR OWN RACIAL SUPREMACIST RELIGIOUS CREED ITSELF PROMOTE FEELINGS OF HOSTILITY AND ILL-WILL BETWEEN THEM SELVES AND ALL GOYIM, <i>SHOULD</i> BE REMOVED FROM CANADA, AND NOT THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR "HATEFUL PROPAGANDA!" IN THEIR OWN TANAKHS AND TALMUDS, TO JUSTIFY IT!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Other Considerations:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">13. It should be emphasized that every suspect item is to be assessed in its entirety, with full recognition given to freedom of expression."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span>THAT'S RICH IN UNINTENDED IRONY, ISN'T IT? "FULL RECOGNITION" OF OUR FREE EXPRESSION RIGHTS (EXCEPT AS PER ABOVE, WHERE THE BORDER GUARDS' OWN SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS DECIDE WHAT IS UNJUSTIFIABLY "HATEFUL" WITHOUT BOTHERING TO HAVE TO TAKE IT BEFORE A JUDGE IN A COURT OF LAW, THUS PRE-JUDGING PEOPLE WHO WANT TO READ IT </span><span>TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY THEIR OWN RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR THEM SELVES WHAT IS AND IS NOT "HATEFUL!" TO THEM, TO BE IN STEAD DECIDED BY SOME LOWLY THOUGHT-POLICING BORDER GUARDS, FOR "PUBLIC" (JEWISH) "SAFETY!" AS IF BY MERELY READING IT, WE BECOME AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY OF PROPAGATING IT IN PUBLIC AS "HATE PROPAGANDA!"</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">IN FACT, BY DECLARING THEIR OWN RIGHT TO SPECIFICALLY "INFRINGE" OUR HIGHEST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, BY DESTROYING EVIDENCE BEFORE IT CAN COME BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT COURTS FOR JUDGMENT, PRESENTS ITSELF AS AN OBVIOUSLY SEDITIOUS ATTEMPT TO UNDERMINE OUR COURTS WHICH HAD THEM SELVES BEEN LEGISLATED INTO EXISTENCE BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT; SO: BY ACTING ON THESE MEMOS, THEY COMMIT TREASON!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And even if we ignore the emotional nonsense, they are still conflating "hate" propaganda with unlawful incitement to violence, by (again) pre-determining without any proof that one will do so unlawfully - because it is legal to call for and incite in public violence in response to ongoing crimes, for instance by demanding the return of the death penalty for REAL sedition and treason, such as is being perpetrated on Canada's citizens by these very same Jews and their compromised and corrupted "Canadian government" border security agents' own illegal activities here!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">FURTHER, IN REGARDS TO SECTION 10: TREASON:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<b>Determining Whether Goods are Treasonable:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">10. Goods that are of a treasonable character are, for example, goods that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate the use of force or violence to overthrow the Government of Canada or a province, or which communicate or make available to an agent of a state other than Canada, without lawful authority, any military or scientific information that may be used by the state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">These memoranda them selves serve that purpose, by advocating the guards forcibly deprive Canada's citizens - our real government - of our property and Constitutional right to read documents to make up and express our own minds, in deference to a hostile foreign nation's government; which is by definition prejudicial to our safety/defence!</span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjS7ufh51mD5CKOoQKd8mfMuj3eEat6ZYMRVTVHTmgaoNYvN36nU2WraccrIvXVbUG4zOJzJot8Th0WkTndXzfOflTlHxJZLmiS5bNjHlO2HvzEeJHIU2phQGcNEfQ3bjMiupNn2dcrDRcDrVC_pfO_uWYQgrWoH7wVnnc-chw_lJONKzuRLvl4w50k/s568/NaziPowerVsJewishPower2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="490" data-original-width="568" height="552" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjS7ufh51mD5CKOoQKd8mfMuj3eEat6ZYMRVTVHTmgaoNYvN36nU2WraccrIvXVbUG4zOJzJot8Th0WkTndXzfOflTlHxJZLmiS5bNjHlO2HvzEeJHIU2phQGcNEfQ3bjMiupNn2dcrDRcDrVC_pfO_uWYQgrWoH7wVnnc-chw_lJONKzuRLvl4w50k/w640-h552/NaziPowerVsJewishPower2.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7P3a1WZR0DNCRbBiDt6AIoB2sUu2RYi4PDIOLKMwkko-Pu2587hwtmbMksvPnlKigZkCCa572QHH3TILu9jp6oR0CnH6Xu_ykGBX1bmVAU-W8FX1ajbxEmJUkTzOLlT6VaUHOEKyJQjO2Q74MFuRYK7Jh01MvFANNKK2PKuHSmv63tqQLZfSKYVb4/s568/NaziPowerVsJewishPower.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="347" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7P3a1WZR0DNCRbBiDt6AIoB2sUu2RYi4PDIOLKMwkko-Pu2587hwtmbMksvPnlKigZkCCa572QHH3TILu9jp6oR0CnH6Xu_ykGBX1bmVAU-W8FX1ajbxEmJUkTzOLlT6VaUHOEKyJQjO2Q74MFuRYK7Jh01MvFANNKK2PKuHSmv63tqQLZfSKYVb4/s16000/NaziPowerVsJewishPower.png" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p><span style="font-size: large;">But don't expect any court of "law" judge to defend your rights - they already all operate on the brazen rule of crime principle, where we are all pre-judged guilty until never proven innocent, just as these memos do. No judge in Canada would see anything wrong with being able to deprive us of our right to think and act for our selves, as the very purpose of "Muh Democratic Politics" itself is to force us to defer our own rightful self-reliant responsibility to think and act for our selves to our re-presentatives!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And so voting is also pointless because by doing it you betray your self - trying to have the right to become irresponsible gives away your right to be self-reliantly responsible to someone else. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The politicians you hire ('elect') to defer your responsibility to think and act for your self don't initially betray you, because they're only doing the exact same thing you were when you hired them: like you, they are not thinking and acting for you, just as you initially refused to think and act for your self!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">But it's still also TREASON, because these professional criminal hypocrite politicians put them selves and their party above the citizens lives! All they're doing is selling our country with delayed sales (bank "loans") to the Jewish Rothschild banksters - it all began when they realized they could take a tiny portion of the taxes earmarked to ensure our roads, watermains, sewers, electrical grids, air water and food inspections, hospitals firefighters police and military - the core job of government being as our largest collectively-owned insurance company, to defend our basic needs - to cater to their own and their followers' private wants, by leveraging it to pay a tiny bit of interest on huge loans to reward them selves with.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And they could thus expand their own fiedoms and powers by rewarding them selves their own families business partners friends and even some of followers without impacting the public services they were tasked to provide - until they had rinsed and repeated it too many times, and now they spend over 50% of the yearly tax budget on paying the sale-delaying bribes called 'interest' alone, which means they now have only half the money left to pay to fix much less expand that same basic infrastructure they swore to protect.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>S</span><span>o now they're forced to force us to squat in place on the old crumbling infrastructure, to build up rather than outwards, as they angrily fear the loss of their own powers perks paychecks and secure pensions and 'projectively' blame us for OUR "unsustainable" greedy lifestyles, when what they really mean is they're scared they can't sustain their borrow and spend ones!</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">So they will herd us into tiny 15-minute neighbourhoods in their SM.A.R..T. (Surveillance Monitored Analyzed by Reporting Technology cities, eating ze bugs and happily owning nothing while they fuck off to their rewards on corporate directors boards in their make-work do-nothing "jobs" in China and Israel, while they gas us with their airborne "vaccines" like the dumb cornered rats their media has dummied us down to the level of!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>IN CONCLUSION:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And the gist of these memoranda implicitly call for the destruction of all evidence of all past crimes; re:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>"The overriding objective of the law is the avoidance of harm to society and that is a sufficiently </span><span>substantial concern to warrant a restriction on freedom of expression.""</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>As such, it sets a very bad precedent, and in fact implicitly calls for the destruction of all precedents </span><span>in criminal cases - and by extension in all civil cases as well.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>For example, if the records of a criminal case where criminals had committed crimes against their innocent </span><span>victims were to always be destroyed, to ensure that no one </span><span>else could ever learn that the crimes had been committed, and also how, allegedly to protect the victims' </span><span>feelings and to prevent anyone from ever learning how to commit new crimes along similar lines, it would </span><span>also destroy the ability of the courts to set and learn from precedents in order to punish crimes, and it </span><span>would also prevent our legislatures from learning from past crimes how to legislate against similar crimes </span><span>in future.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>The emotions-based, literally thought-killing ("psychotic") feeling behind this is that "Ignorance is </span><span>bliss, and so if we destroy all records of past crimes, then no one will ever be able to imagine how to </span><span>invent and perpetrate new crimes in future, either! Whee!"</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>Thus: "Destroying all evidence of past crimes is the best public policy to prevent future crimes. The best </span><span>way to "avoid harm to society" is to deny to the public any knowledge that crimes can be committed, and </span><span>how, lest the evidence of same serve as hate-inducing "crime propaganda!" Because if and when people learn a</span><span>bout crimes, they will be instantly corrupted by them as "hate propaganda" to want to commit them!"</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>This is the level of retard cops are: </span><span>"The only way to prevent crimes and catch criminals is by destroying all evidence of their crimes first!"</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>In the current example, let's just pretend that even if the Nazis were evil criminals, and the Jews their </span><span>utterly blameless innocent victims, then despite the Jews' Nazi enemy criminals having already been caught and </span><span>punished for their crimes by being defeated in WWII, no evidence of "Muh Holocaust!" shall be allowed to </span><span>remain on the public record to hurt their feelings!</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>Is that really what the Jews behind this golem of a legislation want, or have they, simply by creating it, </span><span>as always also thereby caused it to turn on them again, as usual?</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">After all, "If people learn about the Hate-ocaust, that knowledge alone will incite them to re-commit it!" </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Because all goyims are just intrinsically, inherently, inexplicably "Anti-Semitic!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">So, thanks, Jews!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">;-)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Also available for your files to peruse and download from the CBSA's own website in handy .PDF format here:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.pdf</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-17-eng.pdf</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><b>THE SPECIFIC ONGOING CASE SO FAR:</b></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The final decision has yet to be made, but a female agent is in charge, (never a good thing) which means she's emotionally predisposed to act "hatefully" towards those who "display hate" no matter what or whom its righteous target may or may not be.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">I've already drafted a response if they ask for it - but even if I offer it, I'm SURE they will reject is, because it's based on logic, while they are programmed to act on emotion - after all, their whole focus is on subjectively determining the supposedly objective nature of my alleged "hate!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And to prove it, the growly customs cop I spoke with on the phone (the same self-entitled asshole who 'flagged' my book) said I'd probably get to keep the Fuhrer Standard drink coasters and Nazi coin which were also included in my Christmas order, just not the Nazi book. There is no rational <i>rationale</i> behind what they do; it's all only based on their own emotions!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">So even in advance of me being able to read the book which I paid good money to buy, they are tasked with preventing me form doing so because, allegedly just by letting me read it to learn its contents, I am somehow also presumed to be propagating "hateful" propaganda, and they can thereby somehow also determine in advance that I will be actively committing crimes by inciting violence in public.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In other words, they are pretending to be able to defensively, pre-emptively prevent in advance the alleged crimes they have illegally empowered them selves presume, without any need for any evidence at all, to somehow know in advance that I will "surely" commit!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><span>But really, when you make "hate" into a crime, you only make it "illegal" to hate crimes - and the </span><span>criminals who commit them.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Which seems to me to be the point of all this: to cover up crimes by blaming the potential victims for "hatefully" daring to Notice them.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Therefore (it's now a matter of principle to me!) I contacted the vendor (since obviously while the border cop was able to rip open my package and thumb his grubby rookers through my pristine book, I still didn't know its contents, since said Thought Police won't let me even see it) and he very promptly and helpfully gave me a list of the chapter titles, (having contacted the publisher?) to give me a better descriptor to use against them, too - so I will now be able to, at the very least, sue them in Small Claims Court for stealing my property.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">From his helpful assessment, it should become obvious even to these self-blinded drones of "our" politicians' current global (((masters))) that:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"The publisher of the book is "Preuss Academic Review" and it's sold as a English language review of period literature. The price alone signifies it is not meant as propaganda as it's market is clearly those with a serious academic/historical interest in the topic being discussed. From the chapter titles alone there sure doesn't seem to be anything in it that meets their criteria of hate propaganda advocating genocide etc etc. Chapters include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Europe Becomes Healthy Again</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The River of Heredity</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Europe - Peasant Land</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Duty</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Germanic Piety</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Faith and Hardness</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">If you want the daughter - look at the mother.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Eternal German Love Song</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">My Husband is not dead. He lives on in my children</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Soul of the Woman</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Frankish Empire</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">How did our ancestors live ?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The moral foundations of Germanic Piety</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Germanic man under the palm trees</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">The Great King ( Friedrich the Great)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Beauty with the SS rune (article on Allach porcelian)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Duty - The virtue of the Prussians</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">;-)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgy7Yo0s9aOgBDv8tLzPHj3htLYsRULAr0FFxmEHb3ofNpCBfXajIP5XVf5lY4_MJ6-QDI1nt0uCf9thqFDDOh2sslO7Dx_XmwZWXwHPj9P_9GGZZuTg21JP_eAvWzoXQLyxw8GLoaFAL6beMIcAmxhnLP1z4LU-LCGfmMSticwsqwXbjwZL35QLo1h/s640/NoticingIsGoodNotHATE.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="518" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgy7Yo0s9aOgBDv8tLzPHj3htLYsRULAr0FFxmEHb3ofNpCBfXajIP5XVf5lY4_MJ6-QDI1nt0uCf9thqFDDOh2sslO7Dx_XmwZWXwHPj9P_9GGZZuTg21JP_eAvWzoXQLyxw8GLoaFAL6beMIcAmxhnLP1z4LU-LCGfmMSticwsqwXbjwZL35QLo1h/s16000/NoticingIsGoodNotHATE.png" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjhpl05Z12M_fA6BnPCdb6H1MGw720ZqMnfAHqa71UYWxGOqb5k5wQAfyR0ljnoWsRv5vI5OqEZ6srEiLgWLUsoJ0QvJImtysHGCYld1cqmxNtRiuPRcoN6jbntJQioP1vLEfnAPPNA1Aw4W4SPGwfIJyTULXTSqh1BIexLoKOSmUfh6E7k8x1ICbV/s568/WarLIES.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="408" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjhpl05Z12M_fA6BnPCdb6H1MGw720ZqMnfAHqa71UYWxGOqb5k5wQAfyR0ljnoWsRv5vI5OqEZ6srEiLgWLUsoJ0QvJImtysHGCYld1cqmxNtRiuPRcoN6jbntJQioP1vLEfnAPPNA1Aw4W4SPGwfIJyTULXTSqh1BIexLoKOSmUfh6E7k8x1ICbV/s16000/WarLIES.png" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p><br /></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-18289815256037940092023-12-03T08:40:00.000-08:002023-12-03T08:40:23.881-08:00War criminal and New World Order promoter Henry Kissinger finally dead at 100<p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">If you took a pen and piece of paper and charted all the varying opinions about Henry Kissinger's role as a mover and shaker of international events, you'd have a splotchy map that would include a continent labeled "Evil Genius," an island tagged "War Criminal" and an archipelago marked as the "Isle of Foresight." Talk about a controversial bureaucrat.</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Kissinger's carefully plotted maneuverings of the United States' dealings with other countries during his time in the 20th century as head of the State Department has inspired reverence, censure, admiration, disapproval... There is little agreement on whether his influence has helped the U.S. or hurt our international standing. But he definitely helped Israel.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTk-PWRrrIOEq4kyvFhuaUNRmmNrtBNrPjU25OAWB2tFGm61NvWslPzS-NxBYw0RC5DFjFrg2FXrAPEdtqc-wumSt4e7W9Wj4Fg-jYsM1tM8HomRtjSddvN4kldT9tj9d_m-sz5ViIbDBFAlvqscI1A0Qm8tqYCOegNeESOGxAVhb3iSurPbC8TqTD/s568/KissingerOnTheNWO.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="458" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTk-PWRrrIOEq4kyvFhuaUNRmmNrtBNrPjU25OAWB2tFGm61NvWslPzS-NxBYw0RC5DFjFrg2FXrAPEdtqc-wumSt4e7W9Wj4Fg-jYsM1tM8HomRtjSddvN4kldT9tj9d_m-sz5ViIbDBFAlvqscI1A0Qm8tqYCOegNeESOGxAVhb3iSurPbC8TqTD/s16000/KissingerOnTheNWO.jpeg" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">For me, he was the globalist's globalist, the Jew's Jew, the architect behind most of America's lost wars for empire and world hegemony for the last 50-plus years, and instigator of coups and the deaths of millions of people around the globe by the U.S. and U.S.-supplied weapons.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The former Secretary of State, long-time Council on Foreign Relations member and Bilderberger inspired people to shake in their boots. Because where Kissinger went, war followed.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The fossilized old war criminal, long-time friend-of-Hillary Clinton (through the CFR) and neocon war-making kingpin, and former "Never Trumper" — who met with Trump who subsequently promised that he and Kissinger were going to "stop the killing and death" in Syria — knew a thing or three about killing and death. But not much, it seems, about how to stop it.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">In the 1970s as national security adviser, Kissinger oversaw the many U.S.-instigated coups throughout Central and South America, including the overthrow of Chili's democratically-elected government on September 11 (notice the symmetry?) of that year. What followed was 16 years of repression, torture and death under the fascist Augusto Pinochet and a healthy flow of profits to U.S. multinational corporations.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">As The Intercept pointed out, in Kissinger's Shadow: The Long Reach of America's Most Controversial Statesman, Greg Grandin writes that as Richard Nixon's top foreign policy maker, Kissinger:</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><ul style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; list-style-image: initial; list-style-position: initial; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Prolonged the Vietnam war for five pointless years.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Illegally bombed Cambodia and Laos.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Goaded Nixon to wiretap staffers and journalists.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Bore responsibility for three genocides in Cambodia, East Timor, and Bangladesh.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Urged Nixon to go after Daniel Ellsberg for having released the Pentagon Papers, which set off a chain of events that brought down the Nixon White House.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pumped up Pakistan's ISI, and encouraged it to use political Islam to destabilize Afghanistan.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Began the U.S.'s arms-for-petrodollars dependency with Saudi Arabia and pre-revolutionary Iran.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Accelerated needless civil wars in southern Africa that, in the name of supporting white supremacy, left millions dead.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Supported coups and death squads throughout Latin America.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Ingratiated himself with the first-generation neocons, such as Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz, who would take American militarism to its next calamitous level.</span></li></ul><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">In The Trial of Henry Kissinger, Christopher Hitchens examined what he considered Kissinger's war crimes including:</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><ul style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; list-style-image: initial; list-style-position: initial; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The deliberate mass killing of civilian populations in Indochina.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Deliberate collusion in mass murder, and later in assassination, in Bangladesh.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The personal suborning and planning of murder, of a senior constitutional officer in a democratic nation — Chile — with which the United States was not at war.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Personal involvement in a plan to murder the head of state in the democratic nation of Cyprus.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The incitement and enabling of genocide in East Timor.</span></li><li style="list-style: disc; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Personal involvement in a plan to kidnap and murder a journalist living in Washington, D.C. (syndicated columnist Jack Anderson).</span></li></ul><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">In the aftermath of 9/11, after Kissinger was placed as co-chair of the 9/11 Commission (the fox guarding the hen house), he resigned rather than reveal the money his private consulting company made on fees paid by Union Carbide in the wake of the Bhopal, India disaster.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">He also profited over the years, according to The Nation, by:</span></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">...making sure Saudi Arabia's and, until its revolution, Iran's growing mountain of petrodollars were recycled through private banks and arms merchants in Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States—undercutting Third World demands that capital be used to fund a more equitable global economy, what was then called a New International Economic Order.</span></span></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Likewise, in Latin America and Eastern Europe, Kissinger Associates profited from what one of its consultants called the "massive sale" of public utilities and industries, a sell-off that, in many countries, was initiated by Kissinger-supported dictators and military regimes (Kissinger's fudging of the line between public policy and private finance, especially as it relates to the arms trade and petroleum extraction, echoes through many of the controversies of the Clinton Foundation; see David Sirota and Andrew Perez's reporting, especially "Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals from Hillary Clinton's State Department" and "As Colombian Money Flowed to Clintons, State Department Took No Action to Prevent Labor Violations").</span></span></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">This sell-off was part of the global transformation to what is commonly called "neoliberalism," and what in this campaign season has come to be known as Clintonism...</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Kissinger, speaking of the North American Free Trade Agreement, once said: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system... a first step toward a new world order."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">When Obama was elected, Kissinger believed Obama would be the one who would finally bring the new world order into being. In January 2009, days before Obama's inauguration, Kissinger said: "... he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It's a great opportunity, it isn't just a crisis."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Recall that I told you that the CFR had kidnapped Donald Trump. Which explains Trump's decision to bomb a Syrian air base over the fake news that Syria had used poison gas on its own people.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Kissinger once said: "When government controls food, it controls the people," and also opined that people who reject the New World Order are terrorists.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Kissinger is proof-positive that America's wars are not for freedom and liberty but for profit and soft conquest.<br /><br />Well, at least this meme is finished aging well:</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdlazEV6DKaRBNc_TmfqKBKl_StIhWB2pnQHdKisKxmzRCNNnfDzIB7B0xsx-ak62JkTWrjZ37uOY7-0xwyEI-kgDCkXH1YuQuBwfy9ju3mo0uUVCiT1knxF3w8wPxN0rmsgR0BwO0rxF8dvidkzKhyphenhyphenCfOP2i-AaGjxsnnRujgjg61y8U3rGDmM9rn/s568/HenryKissingerFoundAlive-WorldMourns.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="478" data-original-width="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdlazEV6DKaRBNc_TmfqKBKl_StIhWB2pnQHdKisKxmzRCNNnfDzIB7B0xsx-ak62JkTWrjZ37uOY7-0xwyEI-kgDCkXH1YuQuBwfy9ju3mo0uUVCiT1knxF3w8wPxN0rmsgR0BwO0rxF8dvidkzKhyphenhyphenCfOP2i-AaGjxsnnRujgjg61y8U3rGDmM9rn/s16000/HenryKissingerFoundAlive-WorldMourns.jpeg" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /><br />Yours for the truth,</span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Bob Livingston </span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-90595619104944192382023-10-18T12:36:00.004-07:002023-10-18T12:36:56.694-07:00It's a trap! The wave of repercussions as the Middle East fights 'The Last War'<p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Few people are familiar with a little event around 1200 B.C. called the Bronze Age Collapse in the region known as the Levant (now known as the Middle East). Most folks are taught that history and progress travel in a straight line and that each generation improves upon the culture and innovations of previous generations. This is a delusion constructed around a limited Smithsonian-influenced view of the past. In reality, history tends to go in a circle, or a spiral, with innovation leading to ease, ease leading to laziness and corruption, and corruption leading to weakness and collapse.</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Over and over again, humanity reaches for Elysium on Earth only to be slapped back down again and again. The survivors then build grass huts on top of the ruins of the old empires, and they start over from scratch.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">For a moment I want to talk about the Bronze Age and the catastrophe that broke it to pieces. The Levant at this time was rich with civilization and trade, composed of a host of kingdoms including the Egyptians, Babylonians, Minoans, Mycenaeans, Hittites, etc. They had vast economic networks, agriculture, industry and written libraries. The proximity of the kingdoms allowed for such extensive trade relations that this period is often referred to by modern historians as the first "globalized economy."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">What took centuries to build was destroyed in a single generation by a series of disasters. A "mega-drought" caused kingdoms without major water resources to lose agricultural production leading to widespread famine and disease (yes, the climate can and does change dramatically regardless of human carbon footprint). Trade was disrupted by internal disputes, and a mysterious invasion of a group of nomadic raiders called the "sea people" is documented as a primary factor in collapse.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The Sea People attacked numerous kingdoms but were also refugees flooding into the region. They disrupted cultures and economies and dragged a number of empires into the dust. This all happened in less than 30 years. Sadly, because only the elites of these civilizations were able to read and write, many languages and historic documentation were lost.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">This initiated a dark age that lasted for centuries. Humanity was set back, essentially to zero, while living among temples and pyramids of past generations. They must have looked up at those decaying marvels of architecture from hundreds of years ago and wondered "What the hell happened to us?"</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Not everything perished, of course. The Egyptian dynasties were in decline, but they managed to hold together far better than their counterparts across the Levant. But the event represented a setback to human knowledge that was detrimental. One might suggest that if the Bronze Age Collapse never occurred, we might be a space-borne species traveling the stars by now.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Then again, maybe these cultures were so corrupted that they needed to fail so that something better could be built in their place.</span></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">What does any of this have to do with the state of the Middle East today? The smart readers out there surely see what I'm getting at. The intricate relationships and trade mechanisms of the Bronze Age led to great wealth and prosperity, but they were terribly fragile. That same interdependency resulted in their demise as they tumbled like dominoes on top of each other.</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The globalization of today is leading to a similar worldwide implosion. Our irrational ties to foreign entanglements and economies could very well destroy civilization again. Consider what are we about to see as the Israel/Palestine war unfolds...</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Multiple Nations Dragged Into The Conflict</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">I will make my position on the situation clear... I don't care about either side. The same goes for Ukraine and Russia. Their wars are not our wars, and I am highly suspicious every time any political leader tries to lure Americans into choosing one side or the other. To summarize, all wars are banker wars.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The Israelis enjoy our money, but they have a history of proven illicit operations to lure us into war in the past (USS Liberty, anyone?). The Palestinians and most of the Muslim world despise the West and Christianity in general (and I don't really care who started it, the fact remains that our cultures are completely incompatible).</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Both sides use tactics that actively target civilians. I'm not talking about collateral damage like we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan, I'm talking about groups that are consciously engaged in plans for genocide. Bottom line? There are no "good guys" to join with. It's a complete s**t show of ancient tribal nonsense that we should stay away from.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Corporate media and some political leaders are already suggesting that the recent full-scale attack on Israel was planned by governments outside of Gaza. Some are accusing Iran, and others accuse Lebanon. From the extensive amount of footage of the attack that I have examined, I have no doubt that someone other than the Palestinians planned the event. The tactics were far too advanced and far too coordinated; the Palestinians have never been all that smart when it comes to military strategy.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Who planned the attack is another question entirely. So far there are a lot of rumors but no hard evidence leading to any specific governments. Another big question is, how did the Palestinians manage to organize all of this and execute the invasion WITHOUT Israeli intel services knowing about it? Mossad is known to be one of the most intrusive and pervasive covert agencies in the world, yet they were caught completely off guard by this massive attack?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">I think not. I'm reminded of the events of 9/11 and the strange series of intelligence failures that preceded it. I'm also reminded of the lies, propaganda and reactionary response, which led to two decades of meaningless war.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">I'm going to call it here... in a couple of weeks, we will find out that many of the soldiers involved in the incursion were NOT Palestinian. Some of them will be from Iran, Syria, Lebanon, etc. There will be intel that says Iran was a major backer of the plan (The Wall Street Journal already claims this is the case, but they have not provided any compelling proof, yet).</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">A U.S. carrier strike group is on the way to the region now, and this is just the beginning. Europeans will be pressured to go to war, American conservatives in particular will be waterboarded with propaganda telling us that an "attack on Israel is an attack on the U.S.." It will be a lot like the rhetoric Neo-cons and leftists used during the initial invasion of Ukraine but multiplied by a hundred. And, both Biden and Trump have been rattling sabers and testing the waters of war, so don't think that we can avoid this simply by voting.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">East vs West</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Depending on the extent of the Western reaction, the BRICS nations may be compelled to get involved as well. This may not be on a kinetic level, but there is a chance. Russia has strategic treaties with Iran and Syria. China has numerous economic interests and influence in the region as the world's largest importer/exporter.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">These nations might retaliate with the same kind of financial warfare that the West used against Russia — with China and the BRICS cutting off the dollar as the world reserve currency. This would add to the crippling inflation we are already experiencing.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Terror Attacks And False Flags</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">If you were wondering when the next major terror attack/false flag was going to hit the U.S. or EU, wonder no longer. I would be shocked if we made it another six months without multiple attacks tied back to Islamic groups. Some of them will be real and some of them will be staged, and telling which is which will be difficult.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The thing is, wide-open borders in the West have made this far more possible — and the establishment knows it. In my opinion, they WELCOME it. If they can get at least one crazy Muslim to shoot up a strip mall or blow up a football stadium, they will have all the leverage they need to hook Americans into foreign conflicts that don't concern us.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Europe in particular is playing with fire. National governments and the EU have invited tens of millions of these people to their doorsteps and now they have a problem. There are Sharia Law communities all over Europe, there are millions of military-age Muslim men with every opportunity to do great harm. And there are millions of woke leftists currently cheering them on, thinking that they will not be affected and that this is some form of "decolonization."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Closure Of The Strait Of Hormuz, Skyrocketing Oil Prices</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">I have been warning about this scenario for many years; it was only a matter of time before tensions with Iran gave them a rationale to close the Strait of Hormuz and shut down 30 percent of all oil exports from the Middle East to the rest of the world. Keep in mind, Europe is suffering extensive energy inflation, in part because of the economic crisis and also because of sanctions against Russia.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Biden has been trying to hide inflation by dumping oil from the strategic reserves onto the market, but now those reserves are the lowest they have been in decades and, conveniently, this happened right before the strike on Israel. Our reserves are depleted as we go to war. Oil prices and gasoline prices will explode if Iran is implicated in the Israel attack. Iran will run a few giant oil tankers into the Hormuz, sink them, and make the strait impassable for months. Don't be surprised if we see $200 per barrel of oil next year, which will translate to around $7 per gallon gas or higher for much of the U.S.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">A Push For A New Draft</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Let's be honest, current U.S. recruitment numbers are a joke and the woke-ification of our military is making it weaker by the month. No American with a legit warrior mindset or combat aptitude is going to join. The establishment will try to regale conservatives and patriots with tales of "fighting the good fight for family and country" but most will not buy in. With attempts to ignite multiple fronts against Russia, China and the Middle East, they will start talking about a new draft system.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">My belief is that this will fail miserably and would start a civil war rather than fill the ranks of the Army or Marines, but they may have a scheme to deal with this outcome...</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Is This the Real Reason Why U.S. Officials Are Encouraging The Migrant Invasion?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">During the Bronze Age Collapse, certain empires (like Egypt) survived using an odd tactic – Instead of fighting off the invading hordes of refugees, nomads and sea people, they HIRED them and inducted them into important positions within their military. Corrupt authoritarian rulers ultimately found that they faced more of a threat from their own starving peasants than they did from the outsiders, so they joined with them to put down local rebellions.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">This might not be as useful in Europe, but in the U.S. I wonder if this was the intention all along; to bring in millions of military-age foreigners with little sympathy for the existing culture, then in the midst of collapse offer them automatic citizenship and benefits if they join the military. Not on the small scale the federal government has today, but on an enormous scale the likes of which we have never seen.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Maybe the plan was always to leave the gates open and allow illegals to stroll in so that they could act as a mercenary contingent to fight in foreign wars or fight against American citizens should rebellion arise?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Plan C</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The timing of the conflict in Israel is incredibly beneficial to globalists, and this might explain Israel's bizarre intel failure. Just as U.S. and British leaders had prior knowledge of a potential Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 but warned no one because they WANTED to compel Americans to fight in WWII, the Palestinian incursion serves a similar purpose.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The COVID pandemic and mandates failed to get the desired result of a global medical tyranny. The war in Ukraine failed to get the desired results as the warhawks' demands for boots on the ground against Russia fell apart. Perhaps this is just Plan C?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The establishment seems particularly obsessed with convincing U.S. conservatives and patriots to participate in the chaos; there are a number of Neo-cons and even a few supposed liberty media personalities calling for Americans to answer the call of blood in Israel. Some have described the coming conflagration "the war to end all wars."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">I believe that the real war is yet to truly start, and that is the war to erase the globalists from existence. They want us to fight overseas in endless quagmires in the hopes we will die out. And when we do, there will be no one left to oppose them. It's a predictable strategy, but its success is doubtful. Another interesting fact about the Bronze Age Collapse — the elites were some of the first groups to be wiped out after the system broke down.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,<br /><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Brandon Smith</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-48429943426385418662023-03-09T01:41:00.011-08:002023-03-09T01:43:56.982-08:00The Monkey Wrench Gang: A theory on America's increasing infrastructure disasters<p><span style="font-size: large;"> By Brandon Smith of Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty</span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLekuyI0H-PzVVKkM-Ah78vsVZhd93UjSxMh2n0Narjmxpx0WjzJo_iXtpC3LWEaOBS2YvK0FwiVmSFP_b_uS06d9mSdDM4s6ffB1_86NhaFsxioD_C9M8O5Hdgh0xd2p0iYAouKoh8aL_Zk7lW8UoWkxcSSt-2nJeO0aRgJlnnv4H6yf9B2oxKQ/s700/DonkeyWrench.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="590" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLekuyI0H-PzVVKkM-Ah78vsVZhd93UjSxMh2n0Narjmxpx0WjzJo_iXtpC3LWEaOBS2YvK0FwiVmSFP_b_uS06d9mSdDM4s6ffB1_86NhaFsxioD_C9M8O5Hdgh0xd2p0iYAouKoh8aL_Zk7lW8UoWkxcSSt-2nJeO0aRgJlnnv4H6yf9B2oxKQ/w540-h640/DonkeyWrench.jpg" width="540" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Accidents happen, all the time in fact, and often the American public barely takes notice of the number of such events that occur on a monthly basis. The reason for this is that the vast majority of accidents leading to industrial and infrastructure damage are small in scale.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Look at the statistics for train derailments in the U.S. and you might be surprised to discover that there are thousands of these incidents every year. "Fact-checking" websites are quick to cite these statistics as a way to dismiss concerns over increasing disaster events in the U.S. What they don't mention, however, is that the vast majority of these incidents are minor, with negligible damage.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">When was the last time the U.S. saw a train derailment similar to the chemical destruction in Ohio? Not since 2002 when a train carrying ammonia crashed in Minot, North Dakota, and kept clean-up workers at bay due to air hazards. The generalized data used by fact checkers lumps events with a single boxcar derailment in with widespread environmental catastrophes (which are exceedingly rare).</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The multiple Ohio events in particular are very concerning to me for a number of reasons. The media barely reported on the train derailment and chemical cloud the first week. Joe Biden has essentially refused to address the severity of the East Palestine disaster and has not announced plans to visit the area to survey the damage. There has also been confusion over the deployment of FEMA; not that I'm a fan of FEMA, but I'm starting to get Hurricane Katrina vibes from this mess, as if the government is trying to deliberately ignore it.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Even Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg waited 20 days to visit the train derailment. And when he finally did, he disguised himself in a worker's uniform in a quick appearance in the early hours of the morning to avoid the public.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I generally don't engage in theory without considerable evidence detailing clear motive or clear involvement. Call it a gut feeling that I think needs to be addressed, but something very strange is going on here.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Why is the White House acting like this? How easy would it be to make a quick appearance and put people's minds at ease? This is the kind of behavior that leads the public to entertain "conspiracy theories."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">We have seen many conspiracy theories proven true over the past couple of years, from the COIVD pandemic lockdowns, mandates and death numbers being exposed as a sham, the former Twitter management colluding with government officials to censor conservatives, and, according to Seymour Hersh's sources, the U.S. government blowing up the Nordstream gas pipeline to Europe. Conspiracy theorists are racking up an impressive list of wins lately.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">So, I would like to offer my theory on recent events surrounding what seems to be a spike in major infrastructure accidents including numerous food distribution plants catching fire, trains derailing, factories exploding, etc.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><b>Hiding in the swarm</b></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Imagine you are incredibly evil or incredibly mentally deranged, or both, and you wanted to incrementally destabilize the U.S. from the inside. How would you do it?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">First, you would have to have some help from government authorities because if serious investigation was a concern, you are likely to be caught. Officials would have to look the other way, which in the case of Ohio and many other disasters, they currently are. Questions of sabotage are actually attacked as ridiculous, rather than considered as a possibility that needs to be pondered.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">With the government on your side, as it remains passive, you can then operate with impunity. But what then? You would have to commit acts of sabotage in a way that avoids drawing too many public questions. You would have to make the events look like accidents. Industrial and infrastructure failures are statistically common and nuance in terms of scale is often overlooked. As noted above, if a person looks at the stats out of context, they might think a disaster like the one in East Palestine, Ohio, is a normal occurrence.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then, you go to work, rigging localized crises across the U.S. using simple tactics. It doesn't take much to sabotage a train track, or set a fire in a food plant, or explode a metal factory. And, your acts of subterfuge mix in with other commonly occurring disasters, washed away in the swarm as the public becomes too overwhelmed to focus on any single calamity.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Slowly but surely, you and whatever group you are working with are able to wreak havoc on U.S. infrastructure while operating in perfect cover.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><b>The Monkey Wrench Gang</b></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In 1975, author Edward Abbey published a politically charged fiction book titled The Monkey Wrench Gang. The book portrays a group of environmentalist extremists out to stop the "pollution" of the southwestern U.S. using sabotage of machines and infrastructure as a means to grind development to a halt.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Monkey Wrench Gang has long been considered an inspirational work of fiction for the political left, but it is also treated as a sort of <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/12063/242154/71018f432b3ff5c821ac19c602f4ad212208c545/7e40db2c3c73f05641c1115d614879652fd569ad" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">instruction manual for leftists and anarchists</a>. A guide for bringing down the system. It depicts the destruction of minor targets like billboards and bulldozers, up to and including the destruction of bridges, the derailment of trains and the attempted bombing of a dam. </p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><b>It's sort of like the leftist version of The Turner Diaries.</b></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">After witnessing the background activities of groups like Antifa and BLM during the riots, I don't find it hard to believe that there may also be an environmental or political element in the U.S. that is engaging in infrastructure terrorism. This is not to say that the protesters themselves are highly organized, but there is evidence that they are managed by organized people behind the scenes.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">For example, law enforcement offices in multiple cities reported <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/12063/242154/296e60fb96fa890574602af3f7c2a9d951322f52/7e40db2c3c73f05641c1115d614879652fd569ad" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">numerous pallets of bricks and rocks magically appearing on mornings before protest marches and riots</a>. Media fact-checkers once again tried to protect leftist groups by claiming that the strategic piles of bricks and other riot fodder were "for construction," only to be fact-checked themselves later. There was no construction in those areas.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Media outlets asserted that Antifa essentially "doesn't exist" during mass rioting by groups calling themselves Antifa. CNN claimed that riots in Kenosha by BLM and Antifa were "fiery but mostly peaceful" while the city burned in the background. And, if you try to Google information on leftist riots the majority of the results you get back will be on the Jan. 6 event instead of the two years of SJW actions across the country.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">When mass civil unrest is protected by corporate "journalists" and leftist groups are <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/12063/242154/4b2b1fc73aee6f9cd5b3bcc951edf2755a0edb92/7e40db2c3c73f05641c1115d614879652fd569ad" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">funded or even coordinated by think tanks like the Ford Foundation and the Open Society Foundation</a>, we have to consider the scenario of organized sabotage in the U.S. as a means to ratchet up the chaos.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Remember, the motto of these people is "burn it all to the ground."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><b>A rising flurry of disasters?</b></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Again, what I am discussing here is merely a theory, but it is not outlandish to suggest that there may be an organized monkey-wrench campaign made to look like a series of unfortunate "accidents." I suspect that there will be an increasing number of these localized disasters in the coming year with an increasing level of severity. And mark my words, one day you will begin to hear whispers of law enforcement investigations into terrorism surrounding these events.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The value of a compartmentalized sabotage effort cannot be overstated. The overall instability it would cause creates national panic and fear, but if ever exposed as deliberate the campaign could also be blamed on a useful scapegoat. Would China or Russia engage in such attacks? Maybe, but it would also be advantageous to the current administration to place the culpability on foreign enemies.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The White House response to the East Palestine disaster alone warrants inquiry, and the steady drone of the media chanting that "there's nothing to see here, move along" is revealing. Certainly, most of these events including the train derailment in Ohio will be labeled fatal accidents and the public will move on. Just keep an eye on the news feeds, because, very likely, there are many more East Palestines on the way.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,</p><p><span style="font-size: medium;">BRANDON SMITH</span></p><p><br /></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-53175522399049513692023-02-11T13:51:00.001-08:002023-02-11T13:51:58.918-08:00The dark side of the Democrats<p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Democrat politicians have successfully positioned themselves as the party of the poor, and they've created an enmity between the poor and the rich.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Democrat leaders perpetuate this enmity with popular slogans like "living wage," "fair share," "wealth tax," "greedy rich," "rich Republicans" and "evil profits." Their rank and file have bought it hook, line and sinker, never once thinking that they must be kept "poor" in order for their party to thrive.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It also doesn't matter that Democrat policies have been devastating to the poor and middle-class workers in this country for almost 100 years. The poor and middle class still turn out in droves to vote for them.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Great Society</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">By the late 1950s, America had somewhat recovered from the effects of Woodrow Wilson's policies — the Federal Reserve, the income tax and World War I — and Franklin Delano Roosevelt's policies — the New Deal and World War II — and prosperity was returning.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then along came Lyndon Baines Johnson, the Great Society and the next great expansion of the nanny state. Previous Democrat administration policies had been destructive to the people they purported to help and, with his Great Society programs Johnson continued the assault on the poor, always under the auspices of "helping."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Within three years of assuming the Presidency in 1963, Johnson had requested 200 major pieces of legislation and Congress had approved 181 of them. According to Leslie Carbone in Slaying Leviathan: The Moral Case for Tax Reform, "Roosevelt had peddled the drug of government giveaways primarily in the poor neighborhoods; Johnson set up shop in middle-class cul-de-sacs, and most Americans, willingly or unwillingly, wittingly or unwittingly, are forced to shoot up. Johnson's sweeping proposals sought to address almost every issue of concern to Americans: civil rights, poverty, education, health, housing, pollution, the arts, cities, occupational safety, consumer protection, and mass transit, to name only the most prominent."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">And what have these programs wrought? Mark Owen, adjunct professor of economics at Northwood University, wrote a column for LewRockwell.com entitled The Welfare State: Shredding Society. In it he said:</p><p> </p><blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"Births out of wedlock were consistently at or below 5% between 1940 and 1960. By 1970, the rate had risen to over 10% and has continued to rise..."</p></blockquote><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">(It is almost 40% today)</p><p> </p><blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"Divorce rates increased from 9 to 23 per 1,000 married couples annually from 1960 to 1980, while leveling off at 20 per 1,000 through 1998 ... While crime and family destabilization may be two of the more obvious results of the welfare state, there are many others. The stigma for single mother births has virtually disappeared. Intergenerational dependency on government programs with the related lack of skills for self-sufficiency, much like a farm animal unable to live without the farmer for food and shelter, has created people without hope or ambition."</p></blockquote><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Now there are third and fourth generations of single women living off welfare and raising children in single-parent homes. Typically these women live in urban areas and their children are held hostage to failing inner-city school systems. And Democrat politicians, who have run these cities for decades, are to blame for these failing schools.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Poverty mindset — manna comes from the government</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In 1965 Johnson signed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. It provided for aid to poor children in slums and rural areas, created a five-year program for school libraries to buy textbooks and other instructional materials and provided for educational research, among other things. Essentially, the Federal government took over the education of the children.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Carbone wrote: "Representative Charles Goodell warned that the bill's ‘clear intent is to radically change our historic structure of education by a dramatic shift of power to the federal level.'"</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The National Education Association (NEA) teacher's union, a supporter of Democrat candidates and causes, opposes any and all efforts to inject competition or reform into the failing schools. Therefore Democrats oppose them as well. Combined with local teacher unions, the NEA also fights efforts to change the tenure system which protects the jobs of bad teachers to the detriment of the children.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">LBJ's War on Poverty programs were dismal failures. The only success these programs had was in exploding the size of government and its reach into our lives. "Within two generations, more than $10 trillion have been spent on this war, more in current dollars than was spent to win World War II," Carbone writes.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">And through all that, Democrats are still looking for ways to spend money to fund programs to "fight the War on Poverty." Who benefits? As always, follow the money! Michael Barone wrote for The Washington Examiner, "One-third of the 2009 stimulus money went to state and local governments – an obvious payoff to the public employee unions which gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrats and got hundreds of billions of dollars in return, to insulate public employee unions from the effects of the recession which has affected everyone else."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There was another provision in the $787 billion stimulus bill that provided a sop to unions. The money for "shovel-ready" construction projects required it to be spent on firms using union labor. This raises the cost of the projects and freezes out many non-union poor or middle-class construction workers.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This is not to absolve Republicans of responsibility. They were complicit in that they didn't do enough to try and stop the practices before they were implemented nor have they done much to repeal them. Republicans like big government almost as much as the Democrats.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The government has never before been under the complete rule of ideologues of such stripes. They've pushed the government to take over many of the roles traditionally carried out by families and local communities. It doesn't take a village... but "it" also should not be up to the Feds. The cradle-to-grave welfare state of Sweden has always been the envy of the American left, and after implementing as much of it as possible, Americans now get to experience the dark side of the nanny state of high taxes, a sluggish economy that struggles to adapt and innovate, and the erosion of family and community.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Democrats are determined to engage in his type of faith-destroying, socialist legislation to expand the welfare state. They want to grow the government to solve a problem created by the government, and to do so under cover of mob rule (the vote).</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The government has nothing good or nice to give to you. The government is in the business of shrinking freedom (and wealth), not expanding it. Growing government and creating a cycle of dependency is always the goal of the Democrats. Only old dogs waiting under the table for scraps survive under Democrat policies.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Freedom and happiness are only restored through self-reliance and acting on our own judgment. Self-sufficiency and self-worth produce ultimate happiness and human liberty.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Manna to the group is poison to the individual.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">- Bob Livingston = </p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-47274449607607769402022-12-13T01:31:00.004-08:002022-12-13T01:32:53.352-08:00How Soros works to make humanity go extinct<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The following message is from George Soros' own AVAAZ emailer, dated <span face=""Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #5b636a; text-align: right;">Dec 13, 2022 at 1:26 a.m EST; and here's proof he owns the UN:</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span face=""Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #5b636a; text-align: right;">https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/12/7/humanity-has-become-a-weapon-of-mass-extinction-un</span></span></p><p><span face=""Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #5b636a; text-align: right;"><span style="font-size: medium;">And i can only assume the text is right-justified because it was translated into English by its own Hebrew writers:</span></span></p><p><span face=""Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #26282a; font-size: 17px; font-weight: 700;">Extinction epidemic</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Dear friends,</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Humanity has become a weapon of mass extinction.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhow4zurGnaWxNEt0FbmfQ1fEoPoWs3vpxSMQLTGVf1VVNGmuCXo0Ery6wkZSNW_i_p-NYdIUZQ4SovPQZtiO4JPc6qr2N8Y_dKXKXG_RfzWrUYZhdNHwE6u-Pi0DNAuSZkauMRr2-Aus-bzqHJmjgiSJrRptBiDRXF3qAjzfOGUHaP93zhAF_SHQ/s1000/DeadGiraffesBySorosAvaaz.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="600" data-original-width="1000" height="384" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhow4zurGnaWxNEt0FbmfQ1fEoPoWs3vpxSMQLTGVf1VVNGmuCXo0Ery6wkZSNW_i_p-NYdIUZQ4SovPQZtiO4JPc6qr2N8Y_dKXKXG_RfzWrUYZhdNHwE6u-Pi0DNAuSZkauMRr2-Aus-bzqHJmjgiSJrRptBiDRXF3qAjzfOGUHaP93zhAF_SHQ/w640-h384/DeadGiraffesBySorosAvaaz.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">As the human population tops 8 billion, the rest of life is being decimated. We've destroyed two-thirds of the rainforests, half the coral reefs, and a million species are now facing oblivion.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">For the future of life on Earth, the next 5 days are absolutely critical.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Right now, governments and scientists are in final negotiations for a new global deal to stop the destruction of nature -- but there's real danger it will be weak and full of holes.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">We literally have a few days to ensure leaders follow the science and give us a treaty that is ambitious enough to be a turning point for life on Earth. Our team is on the ground, going all out -- but your urgent support now could supercharge their crucial work!</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">If 40,000 make a small donation, we can shake the halls of power, at the talks and beyond, with the voices of Indigenous people, scientists, and millions of citizens. We'll face down the polluters and poachers, pushing leaders to do what the planet is screaming for.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I promise you this: we'll fight with every fibre of our being.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Because Earth can't wait anymore. For the bees, birds, bears, and every strand in the fragile web of life, join this deafening roar for the planet -- donate what you can now:</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $3</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $6</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $11</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $22</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $44</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">OTHER AMOUNT</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">More than 100 governments want to protect 30% of the planet by 2030 -- but scientists say it isn't enough. For nature to regenerate, and to save our planet's life-support systems, we have to protect half the Earth, and we need a global treaty to enforce action.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Our team of campaigners has been fighting tooth and nail to shape this treaty -- and they're at the global summit, right now. But our budget is already at breaking point, and too many leaders are still siding with the polluters and weakening the agreement.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">We need a major surge of people power to save life on Earth! And we can start right now -- if enough of us make a small donation, we will:</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Fight shoulder to shoulder with key advocates and scientists, putting maximum pressure on world leaders at the talks and beyond; </span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Ensure Indigenous voices are at the heart of protecting nature -- we cannot defend life on Earth without securing their rights to their lands and homes;</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Go all out at the talks with a media blitz, hard-hitting stunts, and social media storms to put pressure on governments who are sabotaging ambition, and the future of our planet;</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Work with dozens of celebrities around the world to amplify our call for politicians to conserve at least half of our planet by 2030 and restore our relationship with nature; and, </span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Continue to power Avaaz's fight to defend critical ecosystems, fighting to give nature space to recover and to defend our common home while we still can.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Ultimately, this is about our survival. Even as the planet withers, the chainsaws, diggers, and polluters are charging ahead, pulverising the planet into a barren, lifeless tundra. We cannot miss this opportunity to fight for life on Earth. Donate what you can now: </span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $3</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $6</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $11</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $22</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">I'LL DONATE $44</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">OTHER AMOUNT</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">What happens to the natural world, happens to us all. We are not separate from nature; we are part of it, connected to the very trees, rivers, and oceans that are being decimated. But it's not too late, we can still change course. For the Earth of our dreams, let's rise together, now!</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">With fierce hope and endless determination,</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Mike, Marigona, Adela, Kaitlin, Camille, Bert, and the whole team at Avaaz</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">PS. This might be your first donation to our movement ever. But what a first donation! Did you know that Avaaz relies entirely on small donations from members like you? That's why we're fully independent, nimble and effective. Join the over 1 million people who've donated to make Avaaz a real force for good in the world.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">More information:</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">'Humanity has become a weapon of mass extinction': UN (Al Jazeera)</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">'Fate of the living world' will be decided at Cop15, say scientists (The Guardian)</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">The plan to turn half the world into a reserve for nature (BBC) </span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Avaaz is a 70-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world's people shape global decision-making. ("Avaaz" means "voice" or "song" in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz's biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">You became a member of the Avaaz movement and started receiving these emails when you signed "Community Petitions Site" on 2013-08-26 using the email address gordbrown@rogers.com.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">To ensure that Avaaz messages reach your inbox, please add avaaz@avaaz.org to your address book. To change your email address, language settings, or other personal information, contact us, or simply go here to unsubscribe.</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact .</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Avaaz.org</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">27 Union Square West</span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">Suite 500</span></p><p><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; text-align: right;"></span></span></p><p style="text-align: right;"><span face="Helvetica Neue, Segoe UI, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif" style="color: #5b636a; font-size: large;">New York, NY 10003</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-40057032017937470282022-11-21T01:11:00.007-08:002022-11-21T01:14:00.154-08:00Being alert for medical fraud is not paranoia but survival<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgomZW2nmy06nR7qAKSTR5ISQ2uaIaKDp_RaXj4QtDIHTKK3unAIyDjTBkeRTxIKlbN4SK6fBzAN5TgZHDg_x0o1pfZrFZKtS90VL9APgO2xBqcIeOZEkrT01d2WE9sS97_9pl0xG100VWq8SzdV-jeJqHEyUnJu2fv91zm1582L-Y00TW1xEmd6g/s1163/BenjaminRushOnMedicalTyranny.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="895" data-original-width="1163" height="492" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgomZW2nmy06nR7qAKSTR5ISQ2uaIaKDp_RaXj4QtDIHTKK3unAIyDjTBkeRTxIKlbN4SK6fBzAN5TgZHDg_x0o1pfZrFZKtS90VL9APgO2xBqcIeOZEkrT01d2WE9sS97_9pl0xG100VWq8SzdV-jeJqHEyUnJu2fv91zm1582L-Y00TW1xEmd6g/w640-h492/BenjaminRushOnMedicalTyranny.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;">Fraud always operates under the color of law. Look for fraud anywhere. You will find it in government, in politics, in religion, in money and finance and absolutely in organized medicine.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Fraud and deceit has carried teeming millions to an early grave. Just think of the millions of young boys and men who have died in phony wars camouflaged with propaganda. Now consider the millions who have suffered a living hell and then were sent to an early grave at the hands of "orthodox medicine."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It's called "iatrogenic death," that is, death induced inadvertently by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures. In the U.S. annually is the <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10470/242154/9f91e0945ad9923c084a918cc987c488b45c0e64/3af225c392c7296beb4e21c416ddc61895182f78" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">third leading cause of death in the U.S.</a> Some estimates put the total even higher — at <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10470/242154/e7d65520251f84460a6111db850433a9b6c4e139/3af225c392c7296beb4e21c416ddc61895182f78" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">almost a million deaths a year.</a> That makes the medical-industrial-pharmaceutical complex itself possibly the leading cause of death in the U.S., period.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Yes, orthodox or organized medicine has a pretty face and is almost untouchable. In fact, organized medicine, which should be called "organized promotion of sickness and death," persecutes and prosecutes truth in healing with all the police power of government.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Orthodox medicine is modern medicine that promotes "treatment" but denies healing. Money is in treating but never in curing. So-called "medical research" is hunting but never finding. This is the cloak of modern medicine. We succumb to this deception and fraud because we are too trusting and too lazy to question establishment medicine. The price is high.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In this instance, we have on our mind the millions of men, dead and alive, who have been victims of "cancer treatment" burning and poisoning, which is actually an industry under the color of conventional and orthodox medicine, sanctioned by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the force of law.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Yes, the force of law. Just try an alternative cure and see what happens to you.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Things that are equal to each other are equal to the same thing. Evil is evil, no matter the pretense. Does it matter by what name we call the death of human liberty?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The "health" arm of the U.S. government, The Food and Drug Administration (clever propaganda in that name; placing in the mind of the citizen the notion that drugs are somehow equal in importance to food) has always worked for the best interests of large corporations — Big Pharma and Big Farms — rather than the best interests of the consumer — or the small food producer.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The FDA's record of "protecting" consumers is shoddy at best. It has gone out of its way to ignore critical evidence about dangerous drugs to the benefit of Big Pharma. It censors the scientific truth about natural remedies and nutritional supplements and has killed more people than the CIA, FBI, ATF and DEA combined.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Founding father Dr. Benjamin Rush argued before the American Continental Congress:</p><p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;">"Unless we put Medical Freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship… to restrict the art of healing to one class of men, and deny equal privilege to others, will be to constitute the Bastille of Medical Science. All such laws are un-American and despotic, and have no place in a Republic... The Constitution of this Republic should make special privilege for Medical Freedom as well as Religious Freedom."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Unfortunately, the right to medical freedom was not added to the Bill of Rights in the Constitution; and now we have the government, medical and pharmaceutical groups working together to limit our health choices. In short, we have a monstrous medical monopoly enforced by the increasingly compromised and corrupt Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which routinely censors truthful health claims.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Additionally, the U.S. Government promotes and protects the organized crime of the FDA by protecting their pals at Big Pharma with the new pre-emption policy that bans private lawsuits against drug companies in State courts once a drug and its label have been approved by the FDA. I don't know about you, but that seems like a protection racket for their financiers at big Pharma.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">For an understanding of medical organized crime, read the book The Medical Mafiaby Ghislaine Lanctôt.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">What is health, then?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The FDA's position has always been that natural products are either illegal or harmful, yet falsely marketed drugs from Big Pharma, with at best dubious research on their effectiveness, are perfectly okay for consumers.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It seems that the protected criminality goes on and on. But the reality is that even criminal organizations always self-destruct. Their satanic greed consumes them. The medical mafia commits many overt crimes with the complicity and blind obedience of doctors. But it will eventually end in a state of collapse. It is so evil that it cannot sustain life support.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The medical mafia has built a huge financial empire out of and on fiction like cholesterol and open-heart surgery. The only success they have achieved is a multibillion-dollar medical monopoly.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Medical care in America is political. It is what the "consensus of medical opinion" says it is. "Consensus of medical opinion" is mysteriously stamped on American medicine as a control system to create conformity; alias monopoly. Medical monopoly kills medical freedom and causes costs to skyrocket.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Medical care today is commerce. It's money, and healthcare is only incidental.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">To get serious healthcare in America today, one has to avoid the "consensus of medical opinion" and seek out alternative medical care wherever it can be found.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If you keep listening to the extremists... that means modern medicine and the nutritionists — who will endlessly tell you what to eat and what not to eat this holiday season, as if they know anything except what standard medicine allows — and dieticians, you'll never get off the disease-producing treadmill.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">One of the ways medicine profits most handsomely from you is this: The advertisements all ask you to "talk to your doctor." They do this because they know what standard doctors have been taught — drugs and surgery.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Would you like to get off this treadmill to nowhere?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If so, my team and I have identified the group of doctors who resist the medical-industrial complex's money-grabbing scheme. we have put together a report to tell you about who they are, where they are, and how you can contact these holistic doctors.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Holistic means "whole body," and that means these doctors don't just treat one symptom, they look at all of you. Maybe that's why they're also called "alternative" doctors. If you are looking for one near you, just <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10470/242154/68a6ec9332af7c11d341aeb45e031f3487dadbff/3af225c392c7296beb4e21c416ddc61895182f78" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">go here to get a copy of this exclusive guide right now</a>.<br /><br />Yours for the truth,<br /><br />Bob Livingston<br />Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter<span style="vertical-align: text-top;">®</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-35422216285991349622022-11-16T17:24:00.003-08:002022-11-16T17:25:09.497-08:00Here's why a majority of leftists would not survive an economic collapse<p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiSMjUvJmwid7dhUeWwac9ipXSEjGewwDAz5LCgDpDnLf6hZsi8oPDfB-LzUFYKRnvSM7WzKud5Fst0SOyTee8IZT3MNj-YRx3Ga3B_iNqh1oy2rrk9-CrQ9nUoiF37_7MTSy9aBjtIbzt8XfgjQHGB61ntmcSa9BA74mtU9eIxgHy9szMRilL-A/s763/LiberalPacifier.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="507" data-original-width="763" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiSMjUvJmwid7dhUeWwac9ipXSEjGewwDAz5LCgDpDnLf6hZsi8oPDfB-LzUFYKRnvSM7WzKud5Fst0SOyTee8IZT3MNj-YRx3Ga3B_iNqh1oy2rrk9-CrQ9nUoiF37_7MTSy9aBjtIbzt8XfgjQHGB61ntmcSa9BA74mtU9eIxgHy9szMRilL-A/w640-h426/LiberalPacifier.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;">There is one factor that constantly stands out as absolutely essential to a person's chances of surviving a crisis event, and that factor is mindset. Experience and training are highly valuable. Having proper tools and preps on hand is a huge advantage, but in the end, without mental toughness and the ability to adapt the most prepared person in the world will still likely bite the dust.</span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Mental toughness is something that can be taught... to a point. This is the entire purpose of basic training methods used in the military: To take mundane details and elevate them in the minds of trainees while wearing them down with physical punishment. The goal is to condition the mind to ignore distraction and to ignore fear and pain while focusing on the task at hand. Failure is not an option in war, just as it is not an option in survival. Those who embrace distraction and embrace failure because they think it will make things easier for them are filtered out of the recruitment pool, or the gene pool.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It is no coincidence that the U.S. military is dealing with some of the worst recruitment conditions they have ever seen in terms of people being physically and mentally capable of finishing basic training. The Pentagon currently estimates that 77 percent of young Americans are unfit for recruitment without a waiver for obesity, drug use and mental health problems. Meaning, Gen Z is so unfit physically and mentally that if there was a major war, almost 80 percent of them would be erased from existence.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The problem has gotten so bad that militaries in the U.S. and throughout the west are being forced to lower standards just to meet minimum personnel goals. One can argue that many young people don't want to join the military anyway, but this is beside the point. Even if they wanted to, they would be incapable.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There are a number of reasons for this development, but I would suggest that the spread of leftist ideology among 63 percent of Americans aged 18-29 has created a survival vacuum. A generation of mental weaklings. It's important to remember that younger people have adopted more liberal views for decades, but the political left is not liberal today. The leftists of today are full-bore Marxists, both economically and culturally. They support establishment centralization, they support economic centralization, they support corporate centralization, they support authoritarianism and censorship, they support moral relativism, and they applaud the concept of an all-pervasive welfare state.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In 1980 you might have been able to find a large number of mentally tough people that considered themselves on the left. Today, you will not find anyone.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">With America hovering in a precarious netherworld between stagflationary crisis and deflationary crisis depending on which poison the Federal Reserve chooses to give the country, the stage has been set for an economic disaster similar to the Great Depression or worse. In two years, our system, which is already dealing with a number of threats including high prices and supply chain instability, will not remain functional in the manner most people are accustomed.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If we accept this inevitability, we must then ask a logical question: Who is going to rebuild? Whoever inherits the mantle will either bring America back to freedom and prosperity or plunge our society into perpetual tyranny. It all depends on who survives the crisis.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">One thing that gives me some hope is the fact that leftists as a sub-group of our population are completely incapable of surviving a major economic crisis event. This is not to say that I wish them all to die; I'm only pointing out the reality that most of them won't make it because they are ill-equipped to handle a calamity. Here are the reasons why a post-collapse world would probably be devoid of leftists...</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists Thrive On Crisis... But Die Out During Collapse</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists tend to exploit crisis and tragedy to shore up power and expand their numbers through fear, but there's a problem with this tactic. If the crisis is fabricated, a tempest in a teapot, then they do very well; if the crisis turns into an actual disaster with real-world consequences including financial decline, supply chain disruptions, shortages, and civil unrest, they have no tools to deal with the effects other than mob action and looting.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">What happens if they use mob action and looting when the rule of law is no longer a factor in a country with millions of guns? They will die, by the tens of thousands, as people defend their businesses and homes. The violent hordes we witnessed during the BLM riots would not last long during a collapse scenario where people are more inclined to fight back.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists Are Anti-Preparedness</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The political left has spent the better part of the past 15 years demonizing the concept of preparedness as a tinfoil hat philosophy for “right-wing extremists.” They have set themselves up for complete failure by refusing to acknowledge the practicality of prepping, just so they can attack their political opponents. The stupidity of it is truly mind-boggling.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There are some indications that the COVID lockdowns may have shocked a small number of them out of their foolishness. It's hard to deny the threat of economic collapse when the beginnings of collapse are right in front of your face. That said, prepping is not the only requirement for survival, and progressives buying a few months of food and some guns is not going to save them.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists Have An Aversion To Hardship</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The vast majority of people that argue in favor of an expanding welfare state are on the left. While conservatives support individual charity for those that deserve it, leftists believe that people need to be forced by the government to provide and pay for others who may not deserve it. This ideal is driven by their desire to avoid hardship.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I often find that leftists have delusions of grandeur. They assume that they are destined for great things, that they are smarter than the rest of us and that work or sacrifice are problems relegated to the rural “peasants” in “flyover country.” Their vision of work is a daycare, a place to socialize, find comfort and self-identity, do the minimal amount of labor required and then collect a paycheck. Just look how leftist-dominated Twitter was being operated a few months ago. It was not a workplace, it was a day spa for lunatics.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">These kinds of people are not equipped to endure backbreaking struggle to build a survivable environment. They wouldn't know where to begin.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists Have No Practical Skill Sets</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The avoidance of technical skill sets is a real problem for progressives. There are a handful of people on the left that engage in micro-farming and other basic skills as a form of activism, but they are few and their methods are limited by their ideology. As noted above, leftists believe themselves to be too valuable to be wasted on production. Rather, they see themselves as “management,” the people in charge of the people that do the actual work.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">A person could get by on that kind of thinking in a first-world environment where office jobs, tech jobs and social work is the norm, but in a collapse environment there are no management positions, there are no office workers, there are no elementary school teachers, there are no trust and safety advisers, there are no platform moderators and there are no bureaucrats. You either have a valued knowledge set that can be traded, or you have nothing. You can either produce necessities for yourself, or you can't.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The development of the information age and the data-driven economy of first-world nations has made matters even worse by convincing people that data is a currency. This is a concept that leftists in particular adore because they think labor will become a thing of the past; they will only need their brains and laptop to provide everything they need. This is a delusion. The “Metaverse” is a facade, a con, and there will always be a need for humans to dig in the dirt, to forage and hunt, to farm and to build with their own hands. As the economy derails further, progressives are going to realize this too late.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists Rely on Government To Fix Their Problems<br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If the idea of taking matters into your own hands is abhorrent to you, then you might be a leftist. Leftists view individual action during a crisis as almost criminal; it is important to them that the correct authorities with the correct permissions handle any dangerous situation. Leftists love to defer to the “experts” because this takes the responsibility out of their hands, along with the blame should something go wrong.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">But what happens when government is not functional enough to save the day? What happens when inflation or supply chains or personnel shortages make it impossible for government officials to help? What happens when government officials don't want to help? What happens when they are corrupt and want to see you suffer?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists rarely consider such possibilities. For them, the idea that government could break down, that the grid could break down and that the rule of law could break down is a conspiracy theory. It's only happened hundreds of times around the world in modern history, but because they have never experienced the threat personally, they think it is impossible. These are the kinds of people that die very quickly during collapse.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists Value Feelings Over Reason</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The root foundation of leftist ideology is that everything is relative according to one's personal feelings. That is to say, they believe that their feelings shape their reality, and that “their truth” is the only truth that matters. There are some subjective truths that are near-universal which is why moral conscience is a thing that exists in every culture in the world. That said, personal ideals are still subject to the forces of nature.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">You cannot pretend that you are not starving when you are starving. You cannot pretend that you are not dehydrated when you are desperately thirsty. You cannot feel your way out of a crisis, the crisis is not subject to your fantasies, the crisis will step on your throat and teach you otherwise.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">At bottom, their feelings do not matter. They are irrelevant. And this is a lesson leftists will learn as the system continues to degrade. They can cry and scream and wail and make all the demands they want for fairness and equity and welfare but in the end, they will face the clarity of self-reliance or they will face the Ferryman.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It's not my purpose here to revel in the erasure of the political left. I am only pointing out that leftist ideology is a product of extremely safe and controlled environments where people have the privilege to engage in frivolity. </p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They think they want deconstruction. They think they want chaos as a means to break the system and rebuild it in their image. What they don't realize is that if they get what they want most of them will die in the process and they will not be around to rebuild.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,<br /><br />Brandon Smith</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-36599254287255621542022-11-12T16:19:00.006-08:002022-11-12T16:19:48.097-08:00What the gun grabbers' rhetoric can teach us<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzgjVMyHJTjpyzMSq0lMoh_FAGudTM0NWfS8Xpd_mZm3kSKBzClyQOH-AuNAb8QAAqSVtio7CjQ-5Zbe1NIRYpfFkR3-zF-loMSGhj6PhwllpYfvm85eZC0On7Uf6E-fYkHWxhdirCvhTZcW-pZiO_5F04vW6LEATMqD2q8CRQ0oYnKxTvtwnBLg/s790/GunCrimesByRace.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="790" data-original-width="703" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzgjVMyHJTjpyzMSq0lMoh_FAGudTM0NWfS8Xpd_mZm3kSKBzClyQOH-AuNAb8QAAqSVtio7CjQ-5Zbe1NIRYpfFkR3-zF-loMSGhj6PhwllpYfvm85eZC0On7Uf6E-fYkHWxhdirCvhTZcW-pZiO_5F04vW6LEATMqD2q8CRQ0oYnKxTvtwnBLg/w570-h640/GunCrimesByRace.jpg" width="570" /></a></div><br /><p></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Do you remember the Obamas' interview with ABC's Barbara Walters, where President Barack and First Lady Michelle joked about the president's second term being a ploy to continue having their young children protected by guns?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In the highly personal interview, the President and first lady discussed their marriage and family life in the White House. When the conversation moved on to the Obama's two daughters, the President joked, "One of the main incentives of running was continued Secret Service protection so we can have men with guns around at all times."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This is the same man who tried to skirt the Constitution by issuing a flurry of gun control executive orders; who appointed an anti-gun zealot as a representative to the U.N. assembly; encouraged doctors to ask their patients about guns in their homes; said federal gun control was necessary because it was government's responsibility to protect innocent Americans from deranged extremists armed with "weapons of war" (that means taking guns away from American citizens who own them, because of course, anyone who does is a "terrorist" and an extremist anti-government zealot); and who told participants of an Internet Q&A session that he felt his biggest frustration as President was his inability to convince Congress to pass stricter gun control legislation.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Because the rules are always for thee, and not for me, according to those in the elected class.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They want you to think citizens don't need, shouldn't have, and weren't ever meant to have any kind of armaments... but it's perfectly fine for them when they feel they need protection.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They don't have a care in the world that the intent of the Founders was for free men to be able to protect themselves, especially from the evils of government. But don't take my word for it. The Militia Acts of 1792 were some of the first bills passed by the First Congress and as Mike Maharrey pointed out correctly, "Every able-bodied free man was part of the militia. You'll also note that the act actually requires all men between the age of 18 and 45 to have military-grade weapons. This kind of undermines the whole, 'the Second Amendment wasn't so you could have an assault rifle' argument."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Founding Fathers and members of the first Federal government feared a standing army and wanted individual citizens to be armed and ready at all times.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Contrast this with today's gun-grabbers, of whom Obama was just the most prominent example. John Rappaport pointed out, "During the reign of Barack Obama, mass shootings prompted a White House declaration that community mental health centers would be created across America, in order to spot and treat persons before they committed violent acts. ... The Trump administration consider[ed] a proposal that would use Google, Amazon and Apple to collect data on users who exhibit characteristics of mental illness that could lead to violent behavior," so that their guns could be confiscated.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Still at it</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Despite the Supreme Court's ruling that is having the effect of nullifying many unconstitutional gun restrictions...</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">(Rollcall.com <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10590/242154/7b8acc24923ff3b476fc9f585429f25e312417f6/33c85425e7b9c1011b07665fc2f09fb0cb1c360b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">reports</a>: "A judge in West Virginia this month cited the Supreme Court case when he struck down a federal law that required guns to have serial numbers. So did a judge in Texas who ruled last month that people under criminal indictments can still possess guns and a judge who this month tossed New York's prohibitions on carrying concealed firearms in Times Square, summer camps, subways and theaters. More than a dozen other challenges to gun control laws are pending in federal courts, which legal experts say could leave holes in efforts to curb gun violence and the use of weapons in crimes.)</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">...President Biden is continuing his anti-gun rhetoric and his lies about guns in general.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">According to Reason.com, Biden said in a recent speech: "'Do you realize the bullet out of an AR-15 travels five times as rapidly as a bullet shot out of any other gun, five times — is lighter — and can pierce Kevlar?' he insisted on August 30 while touting his administration's "Safer America Plan," which includes tighter firearms restrictions.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"Really? Well, no. 'President Biden's statement that a bullet shot from an AR-15 travels 5x faster than a bullet shot out of "any other gun" is false,' Greg Wallace, a Campbell University law professor who focuses on Second Amendment issues, told the Washington Post early in September. As for bullets fired from AR-15s piercing Kevlar, 'that is true of almost all centerfire rifle bullets. Body armor protection against rifle bullets requires steel, ceramic, or composite plates. Biden was clearly wrong in his statement,' Kessler concluded."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The lies are part of a much wider net being cast by the anti-gun crowd. They want you to think owning a gun is a disease. Daniel Webster, a health policy expert and co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research in Baltimore, said that disease patterns, observing how a problem spreads, applies to gun ownership, and that gun ownership — a precursor to gun violence — can spread "much like an infectious disease circulates."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In discussing gun ownership as if it were a disease, it follows the trend of many news stories that have appeared after shooting tragedies that portray gun ownership as an oddity at best, at worst, something you need to be cured of, or that goes against God's wishes. I wish I were kidding. Representative Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) once told MSNBC that Republicans on his committee were "...murderers' Row; that's Foxx, Gehrig and Ruth. They all like their guns... I think their guns are next there to their Bibles. I'm not sure which they find more important to them... I think guns trump Bibles on that side of the aisle."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Handguns, not just 'assault weapons' (which are already banned)</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">During a CNN presidential town hall, the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action points out that "Joe Biden expressed his support for a ban on commonly-owned handguns. Responding to a question about the recent increase in violent crime [he] stated, 'I'm the only guy that ever got passed legislation, when I was a senator, to make sure we eliminated assault weapons. The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it's a 9-millimeter pistol or whether it's a rifle, is ridiculous. I'm continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things.' Of course, any semi-automatic firearm capable of accepting a detachable magazine has the "ability to fire" in the manner Biden deemed objectionable. Therefore, the president's statement was a call to ban all semi-automatic handguns, rifles, and shotguns capable of accepting a detachable magazine."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">As Ron Paul often pointed out, that cultural Marxists and progressives like Biden and Cohen and their fellow Democrats push for gun control and conveniently "ignore how gun control has been used against African-Americans in the past and how new gun control laws will disproportionately harm racial minorities" whom they purport to protect.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Unfortunately, for 100 years the courts and politicians and the power elite have used laws and propaganda to slowly but steadily erode the 2nd Amendment protections that guarantee the right of self-defense for everyone. Even Supreme Court rulings that seemed to uphold the right to keep and bear arms were designed to erode that right, as we explained regarding the District of Columbia v. Heller ruling written by Justice Antonin Scalia, mistakenly hailed as a gun rights defender by conservatives.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The gun control problem is a mind control problem. The authorities know full well that they, even with all their high-tech weapons, cannot subdue a determined people with private arms. This is why they want your guns. Therefore, they use all manner of spurious persuasion to get you to give up your arms and to exert hostility toward others who won't. Same old divide and conquer.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Nothing is more dangerous to liberty than an unarmed populace. As always, it is why I urge you to <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10590/242154/48250ee2b4ddf3f1e14bbe26ff13a0546752a8e8/33c85425e7b9c1011b07665fc2f09fb0cb1c360b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">purchase a firearm</a>, become trained in its use and maintenance, and practice with it. <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10590/242154/d5e71df952fdb6fdc330547c9cf5dac828410fe5/33c85425e7b9c1011b07665fc2f09fb0cb1c360b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Here's a list of waiting periods by state</a> before you can take possession of a gun you wish to purchase. If you need a conceal-carry license, <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10590/242154/78971c80f1620ceb3e177ae3bcb11627a36ddef0/33c85425e7b9c1011b07665fc2f09fb0cb1c360b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">go here for one that works in multiple states.</a></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The man or woman who silently keeps arms and learns to effectively use them is the greatest force there is in defense of freedom.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">As of now, there are only a few federal politicians with the courage to try and make this illegal, though they have done all possible to impress upon the public mind that private arms possession for any reason is un-American and even sick or terroristic behavior. Their debate is twisted nonsense, but people believe it.<br /><br />Yours for the truth,<br /><br />Bob Livingston<br />Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter<span style="vertical-align: text-top;">®</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-32371370482878750372022-09-28T20:59:00.001-07:002022-09-28T20:59:36.533-07:00Response to Volkischexe's essay on Nihilism <p><span style="font-size: large;">In response to:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">https://gab.com/volkischexe/posts/108745645184350950</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">https://wiccawicci.com/philosophy/nihilism</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Okay, I read it. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">You assert that nihilists are basically lazy and inconsistent because they don't believe anything </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">matters. But they do - to them, it matters very much that everyone else accept their apparent point of view and </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Submit to it, lest they remain dangerously motivated against it. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Further, while it's true that they love to initiate change - seemingly for its own sake - it's really so they alone </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">can control the infliction of pain-causing damage first rather than continue to have it inflicted on them by others. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Change initiated by others really scares them, which is precisely why they so-fervently want to dominate it ALL. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">They hate and fear their own brains' "painful" detection of patterns of difference - and so try to neutralize such </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">"diversity" by ignoring it, and/or "equalizing" it just by "including" it in the same categories as that which it </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">clearly differs from. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">But difference is endemic to existence, so their desire to crush all of the risky dynamics of life to render them </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">"safely" static, can never succeed. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">As for whether or not any truly objective "Greater Meaning"/Higher Purpose" (and/or Greater Purpose/ Higher Meaning) </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">exists - no it doesn't: the only purpose of existence is to exist, and of life is to life. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">The purpose of consciousness seems to be to sort and discriminate patterns, to categorize them into dynamic </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">perception and static conception, and perhaps maybe even to try to turn all risky dynamic perceptions into safely </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">static conceptions after all, but in a sane and logical way, as in to learn to heed one's fears as helpful </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">internally generated warnings to learn from to avoid future pain-causing damages, rather than illogically in the </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">literally backwards and insane manner as to regard one's own fears as threatening externally-inflicted additional </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">damage-causing pains, to be ignored avoided and even foolishly attacked, to embrace hope as a plan in order to heal </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">damage, as Christians are taught to do. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">In short, I believe this has always been a war of hypocrite criminals against their honest civilized law-abiding </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">victims, not one where we are only harming ourselves and our posterity by attempting to conform to universal, global </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">ideologies - as long as that global ideology is hypocritology. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">This could well lead to a Roddenberry-like Utopian future for all of mankind in its various nations - where the </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Blacks and Muslims, like the "Klingons" they were coyly mocked as, must learn self-control of their own greater </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">violent animal instincts than ours, but also to not resent us for the relative ease by which we can control ours.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">However, regarding your final conclusion that: "you were not gifted with free will and intelligence so that you can </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">send yourself down a spiral that ends in black nothingness. Your existence matters because you exist."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Well, maybe not, but "the gods" certainly can and often do - my family has a history of Alzheimer's, where all of our </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">thoughts and free-will choices and intelligence spiral down into black nothingness where we are forgotten and </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">erased, whether we like it or not.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">As for being deliberately Created - again, No.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">As I like to tell Abrahamic monotheistic Christians:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">There is no higher power, greater meaning or higher purpose; it's always all material. The purpose of existence is </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">to exist, of life to live, and of consciousness to sort symptoms from causes to better avoid pain-causing damage, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">the fear of it, the greed for less and the ultimately useless hope of no more of any of it ever again. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">That </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">emotional and sensational cycle is known as dharma. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Christianity is a lie, as it promises an eternal damage, pain, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">fear, and greed (and therefore also hope and consciousness-free) heaven, which is totally impossible because without </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">experiencing all of them, we can't experience any of them. Further, "Sin!" by all of its symptoms, is nothing more </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">than all-too-common hypocrisy; it's not some magical, "spiritual stain" on one's "soul" (consciousness) which only a </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">god can absolve forgive and remove. It was the criminal choice to attack thereby innocent other people first, and as </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">it was one's own free-will choice, only one's self can remove it by first repenting of it and asking one's victims </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">for forgiveness while offering them reparations. No one - not even the alleged One True God, Creator of the entire </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Universe, aka the First Cause and Prime Mover (which by definition must always attack every one and every thing else </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">first, even if just by the act of creating them, and thus is by our definition entirely immoral itself) can defeat </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">and save even its self from dharma, much less promise anyone else that it can and will "Save!" them from it, much </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">less just for declaring by turning off their equally allegedly god-given brain's pattern-detecting ability, to have </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">some sort of false "Faith!" and to "Believe!" in what they do not know and even if they did, makes no logical sense, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">as I have just explained. Nor can anyone just "not-attack-first" their way into heaven, either. It doesn't exist. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">There is no "after" life which can be any different than this one. Dharma is eternally part of consciousness.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">As for "Faith:"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Re: "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." Hebrews 11:1 KJV</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">No. Hope of things not proven by yet being seen and realized is the exact OPPOSITE of "evidence." It's denial of </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">evidence. And mere Hope (aka "Faith!" and "Belief!") is NOT "A Plan!" at all, and in fact, it's a recipe for </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">disaster.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Christianity projects nebulous hope as a solid future fact, as "Faith!" and "Belief!" that God has, embodies and </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">will reveal the perfect solution to every problem in one Final Day of Judgment. The problem with this idol is, "The" </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Perfect Solution to every problem can't exist, because the perfect solution for one problem not only wouldn't also </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">perfectly fit even a slightly different problem, and might cause other ones; but even if it could, it would unify </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">the whole universe to such an extent that it would cease to be fractured divided and "damaged" and so we would all </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">simply cease to be conscious at all, as no differences would exist for our brains' pattern detectors to </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">discriminate, de-fine, etc and it would all become a solid Nothing. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">And of course there can be no "Beginning" of Everything and/or End of it all/Final Day of Judgment, simply because </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">the only thing which cannot exist is Nothingness "itself" and to have a 'Beginning' implies Nothingness DID once </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">upon a time exist, and the putative End of All Things presumes it will exist again in the future.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Re: " We weren't created to conform to a single, unchanging worldview - if we were, achieving such unity would be a </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">trivial matter, because it would be natural. </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">n our limited capacity as humans, we cannot possibly play the role of the gods. It isn't within our authority to </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">determine which nations - or which people - have a right to exist. The intentional nature of our existence is what </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">gives us the right to exist." A</span><span style="font-size: x-large;">nd, re: "we are only harming ourselves and our posterity by attempting to conform to universal, global ideologies."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">So again, I say: No!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Maybe there aren't any more things, people, nations, or "souls" (consciousnesses) than just you. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Let's speculate about the Christians' theology, where their One True God, Creator of the Entire Universe, Prime </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Mover and First Cause ideal, is omniscient and supreme, and, as Spirit trumps flesh, only dynamic mind truly exists, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">and static matter is only an illusion. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">But then that also means that for the illusion to fool the Godly uber-mind, it must be created by that same God's </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Mind - as Doubt. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">So thoughts alone, even as a god (say, Thoth) doesn't mean all "spiritual" thought is logical sane </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">or even good and efficient - there can be mistakes and "bad" thoughts, too. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">God thinks: "I am Perfect, and, as I Am everything, I can and will do anything I want, when and where ever I want to </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">do it! Whee!" </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">But then, because he is thought and therefore has to think all thoughts, even the incorrect ones, he also thinks: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">"But what if I'm wrong? What if I did evolve from mere insensate matter, but, since then I was insensate until I </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">wasn't, I certainly couldn't remember any of it?" </span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">So God, by being infinite and eternally conscious, must invent Doubt. Which means our "Faith!" in Him as the Only </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Perfect Being is utterly useless, as not even He can have Perfect Faith in His own Self, much less in us and ours!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">And more, since he can and will do anything and eventually, through being bored and distracted by doubts, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">everything, he eventually creates a whole lot of little versions of him self (aka the pagan gods, and then us) to </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">play out his infinite mental/spiritual speculative fantasies - and because we have different hopes dreams wishes and </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">desires in our doubt-limited ("faithless") lives, we are in conflicts with each other, and so we are limited to </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">"laws" of physics just to even peacefully co-exist?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">So maybe, as you say, he speculates that other councils of lesser, "pagan" gods have also always existed (and </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">therefore they do) to monitor and influence the various Nations and Tribes in their separately "evolved" </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">environments, too.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">So we can see how that Judeo-Christian "God is pure spirit, power and will, and thought itself and is omniscient, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">omnipresent and omnipotent" theory works out in real life?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">As in: it doesn't, because it can't. If and when one is omniscient, then, since consciousness can only exist to </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">learn to think about things, and one already knows everything, then one cannot learn or think because one has </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">literally nothing left to learn.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">Similarly, if one is both omnipresent and omnipotent, then, as one is already everywhere, having left and arrived, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">one has nowhere left to go, and nothing left to do to expend any more power, having already done everything - so in </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">effect one is mindless, powerless, and nowhere; again, when one's god is generally only "Everything!" then it is </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">also by definition specifically only "Nothing."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">In Conclusion: What you call "Nihilists," I identify as hypocrites!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: x-large;">;-)</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-55622546388981422762022-09-28T16:26:00.000-07:002022-09-28T16:26:01.079-07:00Anti-globalism is going mainstream... which means engineered disaster is about to strike<p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">From Brandon Smith of the Bob Livingston Personal Liberty Letter 28 Sept 2022:</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQLp8wvI9mHge4JXk75-ASeCbkBHj26-m92dsf2WGaLUoa88pXNragQRQmn-31qGNjo1C3tb2c62DLtGEifI6TO-sdNWhq0kov9UT7BMfzQ5eqaqrQwt7AZklOsK3BBYZItnIj5p5ySL0GGfJo__55U8VLRfeYpZL4CevuC8FF8AEZOh4TzEfBKw/s1200/USDollarPurchasingPowerChart.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="771" data-original-width="1200" height="412" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQLp8wvI9mHge4JXk75-ASeCbkBHj26-m92dsf2WGaLUoa88pXNragQRQmn-31qGNjo1C3tb2c62DLtGEifI6TO-sdNWhq0kov9UT7BMfzQ5eqaqrQwt7AZklOsK3BBYZItnIj5p5ySL0GGfJo__55U8VLRfeYpZL4CevuC8FF8AEZOh4TzEfBKw/w640-h412/USDollarPurchasingPowerChart.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">For many years I have noted that criminals tend to brag about their criminality only when they believe there is nothing anyone can do about it. Frankly, in their narcissism, many of them can't help but revel in the moment and let everyone know how "superior" they are to the rest of us. We witnessed many moments like this from elitists within globalist institutions over the past couple of years at the height of the pandemic pandemonium.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There were people like the globalist academics at MIT proclaiming that we were "<a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10153/242154/676d037f78935cb9e79bb3e76fd4c231c4389ee6/24bd6f998a7f48806bbd6cd09b0f26ce185651a0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">never going back to normal</a>" and that we were going to have to accept the loss of many of our freedoms for the rest of our lives in order to combat the spread of COVID. There were people like Klaus Schwab declaring the beginning of the "<a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10153/242154/8b05e1367988513a6e025964a2556f60028b104a/24bd6f998a7f48806bbd6cd09b0f26ce185651a0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Great Reset</a>" and the launch of what the Davos crowd calls the "4th Industrial Revolution." There have also been many political leaders like Joe Biden who strut around on the media stage <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10153/242154/0bbe2bc29e13659d973345f4af2982cebb60acc2/24bd6f998a7f48806bbd6cd09b0f26ce185651a0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">accusing ideological opponents (conservatives mostly) of being "enemies of democracy."</a></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If their vision of "democracy" is medical tyranny and the forced expansion of cultural Marxism through government cooperation with corporate monopoly along with the erasure of our country's founding principles, then yes, I suppose I am indeed an enemy of "democracy."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The globalists were really basking in the glow of their assumed victory. They really thought they had us peasants by the scruff of the neck and that their agenda was all but assured. But as I have been arguing since last year, the money elites may have celebrated a little too early.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The COVID agenda utterly failed if the goal was to implement longstanding mandates and restrictions. If you want to know what success for the globalists would have looked like, just examine China with its endless lockdown cycles and digital vaccine passports. The elites wanted that outcome for the west and they didn't get it. They came close, but millions of Americans, Canadians and Europeans stood their ground and the cost to force us into compliance would have been too great.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10153/242154/f15e42184d48144612da4718d279a5c8195ce399/24bd6f998a7f48806bbd6cd09b0f26ce185651a0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Even Joe Biden has openly admitted that the pandemic is over.</a> They dropped the mandates because they knew if it came to war, they would lose.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If the goal of the pandemic fear factory was simply to get the population injected with the mRNA vaccines, here they also failed. With many states in the U.S. 40 percent unvaxxed (according to official numbers) and many parts of the world with large unvaxxed populations, there is a massive control group for the COVID vaccines. If there are going to be constantly developing health problems associated with the mRNA vax (like Myocarditis) then we are going to know what caused them because of this control group. The globalists needed near-100 percent vaccination and they did not get it. Not even close.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There is no escape for them. They greatly overestimated the public's apathy when it comes to authoritarianism. The rebellion is too large, and they will eventually be held accountable for their trespasses.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Case in point: The latest election in Italy has resulted in a landslide win for the conservative coalition and the new prime minister (and first woman prime minister), <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10153/242154/141e1401947ff16e0452c54adaaaa7be87fb2f34/24bd6f998a7f48806bbd6cd09b0f26ce185651a0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Georgia Meloni, gave a rousing victory speech</a> this week that directly exposed the far-left invasion of western nations, globalism and the poisonous collusion with woke corporations to silence dissent. She called for a return to freedom, and what was the mainstream media response? They are calling her a "fascist," even though she openly supports Israel and the Jewish agenda.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Italian election represents an ongoing trend, an awakening of the people to the imminent threats presented by globalists, and they can't stop it.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The fear among the globalists is palpable. Anti-globalism is now going mainstream, and as it does people are going to start looking for answers. Why have our global economic conditions been so degraded? Why are we facing a stagflationary crisis? Why are prices on everything continuing to climb? Why did we almost lose all of our civil liberties in the name of fighting a virus with a tiny 0.23 percent official median Infection Fatality Rate? Why are pointless carbon controls being instituted in the middle of a supply chain crisis? Why are politicians and banks making everything so much worse?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The public outcry for a reckoning is growing and it's the heads of globalists that will end up on the chopping block. All roads to destruction lead back to them and the policies they have forced upon the populace.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Of course, when criminals feel like they are being cornered they will sometimes set fires and take hostages in a last-ditch effort to stay alive and slip through the net. I believe we are closing in on that stage of this terrible drama. It's important to accept the conditions of the battlefield as they are and not underestimate the enemy. The truth is globalists have extensive means at their disposal to wreak havoc and they have already set some disasters in motion.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">As I warned many years ago, tensions with eastern nations are being used to diminish the role of the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency and the petro currency. The conflict is also causing resource shortages and supply chain weakness, not to mention an energy crisis in Europe.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I also predicted in 2017 that the Federal Reserve would repeat a pattern of raising interest rates into severe economic weakness causing increased economic turmoil. They used a very similar tactic at the onset of the Great Depression, which former federal reserve chairman Ben Bernanke openly admitted was the cause of the long-term deflationary collapse.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">From my article in 2017:</p><p>"<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">The changing of the Fed chair is absolutely meaningless as far as policy is concerned. Jerome Powell will continue the same exact initiatives as Yellen; stimulus will be removed, rates will be hiked and the balance sheet will be reduced, leaving the massive market bubble the Fed originally created vulnerable to implosion.</span></p><blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p></blockquote><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">An observant person... might have noticed that central banks around the world seem to be acting in a coordinated fashion to remove stimulus support from markets and raise interest rates, cutting off supply lines of easy money that have long been a crutch for our crippled economy."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of central banks and the institution that writes global policy initiatives for all other member banks, <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/10153/242154/34906d320c5fb892622b8da8fc707ebb1fb3a8a5/24bd6f998a7f48806bbd6cd09b0f26ce185651a0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">called for more rate hikes</a> last week. This shows that the globalists want a crash and are engineering conditions of instability. They set up the dominoes in advance and now they have decided to knock them down. I think this is a failsafe; a panic trigger in the event that the globalists did not get the control they wanted from the COVID pandemic.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They will blame Russia, they will blame China, they will blame conservatives, and they will blame anything and anyone besides themselves in an attempt to divert public attention away from the international banking actions that created the crash conditions in the first place. We can't let them. Whatever happens next, it is vital that people remember who really did this to us and who needs to be punished.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The establishment power brokers are going to attempt to use a chaos screen in order to sow seeds of fear in the population. They are going to try to exploit that fear to gain even more centralized governance and change the very foundations of our society while suffocating what's left of our liberties. It's the only play they have left, but at least we now know there are millions of us out there... millions of people who will not comply and who will fight back. And we know that the globalists are afraid; if they weren't then they would not be falling back to such drastic measures.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,<br /><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Brandon Smith<span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-91729192026649709982022-08-20T22:16:00.000-07:002022-08-20T22:16:00.110-07:00Democrats, the anti-worker party<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfgdwIV_PCqRew1GVOBnxhkDEN4fzQiBQ_anDqS4av4_8JKCQpS2IH2B2LKJmbIpyT8ECSIfzqZQKalig4zjUN738oigs-QAAqt78PByrGr7SUm9chq4zwW39I-bfBAUN9murnQ5xFC-LaN315D-qBsaaY81u0OkTjkE76xVoR4pimYDSlWoFAkw/s649/UnionGibs.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="438" data-original-width="649" height="432" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfgdwIV_PCqRew1GVOBnxhkDEN4fzQiBQ_anDqS4av4_8JKCQpS2IH2B2LKJmbIpyT8ECSIfzqZQKalig4zjUN738oigs-QAAqt78PByrGr7SUm9chq4zwW39I-bfBAUN9murnQ5xFC-LaN315D-qBsaaY81u0OkTjkE76xVoR4pimYDSlWoFAkw/w640-h432/UnionGibs.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /> <p></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Ask a Democrat why they're a Democrat and they'll usually say it's because the Democrat Party is the party of the working man. These people believe this so strongly that they'd vote for the Democrat over anyone else, even if the Democrat on the ticket was an old yellow dog.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It doesn't matter that Democrat policies have been devastating to the poor and middle-class workers in this country for almost 100 years. The poor and middle class still turn out in droves to vote for them. Democrat politicians have successfully positioned themselves as the party of the poor, and they've created an enmity between the poor and the rich.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Democrat leaders perpetuate this enmity with popular slogans like "living wage," "fair share," "working poor," "greedy rich," "rich Republicans" and "evil profits." Their rank and file have bought it hook, line and sinker.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Great Society</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">By the late 1950s, America had somewhat recovered from the effects of Woodrow Wilson's policies — the Federal Reserve, the income tax and World War I — and Franklin Delano Roosevelt's policies — the New Deal and World War II — and prosperity was returning.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then along came Lyndon Baines Johnson, the Great Society and the next great expansion of the nanny state. Previous Democrat administration policies had been devastating to the people they purported to help and, with his Great Society programs Johnson continued the assault on the poor under the guise of helping the "less fortunate" (as if success is only about how you're born, the opposite of the American ideal).</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Within three years of assuming the Presidency in 1963, Johnson had requested 200 major pieces of legislation and Congress had approved 181 of them, according to Leslie Carbone in Slaying Leviathan: The Moral Case for Tax Reform.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"Roosevelt had peddled the drug of government give-aways primarily in the poor neighborhoods; Johnson set up shop in middle-class cul-de-sacs, and most Americans, willingly or unwillingly, wittingly or unwittingly, are forced to shoot up. Johnson's sweeping proposals sought to address almost every issue of concern to Americans: civil rights, poverty, education, health, housing, pollution, the arts, cities, occupational safety, consumer protection, and mass transit, to name only the most prominent," according to Carbone.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">And what have these programs wrought? Mark Owen, adjunct professor of economics at Northwood University, wrote a column for LewRockwell.com entitled The Welfare State: Shredding Society. In it he said:</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"While crime and family destabilization may be two of the more obvious results of the welfare state, there are many others. The stigma for single mother births has virtually disappeared. Intergenerational dependency on government programs with the related lack of skills for self-sufficiency, much like a farm animal unable to live without the farmer for food and shelter, has created people without hope or ambition."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The welfare state has created a cycle of dependency that perpetuates itself. Now there are third and fourth generations of single women living off welfare and raising children in single-parent homes.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Typically these women live in urban areas and their children are held hostage to failing inner-city school systems. And Democrat policies are to blame for these failing schools.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In 1965 Johnson signed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, according to Carbone. It provided aid to poor children in slums and rural areas, created a five-year program for school libraries to buy textbooks and other instructional materials and provided for educational research, among other things. Essentially, the Federal government took over the education of children.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Carbone writes: "Representative Charles Goodell warned that the bill's 'clear intent is to radically change our historic structure of education by a dramatic shift of power to the federal level.'" Gradually, step by small step, this is the goal of all progressive, statist Democrats, as you can see today with the constant call for Federal laws and federal takeover of everything, but I digress.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The National Education Association (NEA) teacher's union, a supporter of Democrat candidates and causes, opposes any and all efforts to inject competition or reform into the failing schools. Much the opposite, in fact. Their national meeting this year was all about gender politics, as they sought to change "mother" to "birthing parent," "father" to "non-birthing parent," and "maternity leave" to "parental leave" in the name of LGBTQ inclusion in all contract language. The measure failed, this year at least.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Democrats support such "woke" attempts and also oppose any competition to progressive union teachers and school competition as well. Combined with local teacher unions, the NEA also fights efforts to change the tenure system which protects the jobs of bad teachers to the detriment of the children.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Echoes of FDR</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Like Herbert Hoover, George W. Bush was a Republican without a conservative soul. And just like Hoover, his policies to battle the recession were all wrong. First was the stimulus bill of 2008, a $150 billion — 1 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) — kick in the economy through tax rebate checks that the government hoped would prevent or shorten the recession.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Next came the $700 billion Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). "I've abandoned free-market principles to save the free market," Bush said at the time.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then Obama went one better than Bush. Just two months after taking office he pushed through Congress a $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. So within the space of one year more than $1.5 trillion new dollars had been injected into the economy, further eroding the value of the dollars the poor and middle-class hold.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Michael Barone wrote for The Washington Examiner, "One-third of the 2009 stimulus money went to state and local governments — an obvious payoff to the public employee unions which gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrats and got hundreds of billions of dollars in return, to insulate public employee unions from the effects of the recession which has affected everyone else."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">And then there are the new tax increases in Biden's so-called "Inflation Reduction Act of 2022" which will do no such thing. How can it, with over $400 billion in new spending? Of course, growing government and creating a cycle of dependency is the goal of Democrat tax-and-spenders.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Party of the working man (or woman)? Not hardly. Only old yellow dogs waiting under the porch for handouts thrive under Democrat policies.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They're convinced they can spend any amount of money, steal any freedom, impose any onerous regulation or create yet another bloated bureaucracy and you will like it. If not, they have both free, fawning media coverage and also enough dough in their pockets to pay for glitzy television advertisements to convince you that whatever they are up to is for your own good.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">How Democrats have managed to maintain the myth that their policies are beneficial to Average Working-class Joe (or Jane) is one of the great mysteries of all time — ranking up there with dark matter and how Joe Besser ever became one of the Three Stooges. For Democrat big-government policies have been devastating to the "working" man.<br /><br />Yours for the truth,<br /><br />Bob Livingston<br />Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter<span style="vertical-align: text-top;">®</span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-9687481082581237912022-08-17T15:47:00.004-07:002022-08-17T15:47:41.360-07:00Should red states block federal agencies like the FBI and IRS from operating with impunity? Blue states already do it!<p> From Brandon Smith of Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty Digest 17 August 2022</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiEnX_O6SRDvAIktSEQepUDKKxgwwWhduYHZ0WAtjAi8OqJlbJ9xZDbUI2jTTsoSOtjugRKpgrsQ0od8vBaVLAOZ1fYplBh_TFxEy_q98oV4LCNUWI8oLQHAyoHNz4wCjOCYlaqaCTCkZSNAWNUjrDZMGfZvZsrQwovch91_pkihgAB-nea3fnQA/s921/weaponized_irs_by_rogue5-d7gem2e.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="868" data-original-width="921" height="603" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiEnX_O6SRDvAIktSEQepUDKKxgwwWhduYHZ0WAtjAi8OqJlbJ9xZDbUI2jTTsoSOtjugRKpgrsQ0od8vBaVLAOZ1fYplBh_TFxEy_q98oV4LCNUWI8oLQHAyoHNz4wCjOCYlaqaCTCkZSNAWNUjrDZMGfZvZsrQwovch91_pkihgAB-nea3fnQA/w640-h603/weaponized_irs_by_rogue5-d7gem2e.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">The concept of "sanctuary cities" has long been implemented within predominantly leftist states in America. It's not anything new. Any operations by DHS and ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) within blue states to arrest and deport illegal immigrants is often met with aggressive resistance by Democrat-run city governments.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Keep in mind that foreign individuals have no right under the constitution to reside in the U.S. without first gaining citizenship. Leftists say they don't care and are happy to welcome millions of illegals into the country with open arms in direct violation of laws protecting our borders as well as the stability of our economy and society. They do this NOT because they are foolishly humanitarian; rather, they see it as a means to import a massive voting block that will give leftists whatever they want because they believe they will get citizenship in exchange.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If they didn't want millions of illegal votes, then Democrats would not be constantly attempting to block voter ID laws.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Obviously, the political left is openly hostile to federal agencies when those agencies happen to obstruct their agenda. Though it's rare these days for blue states and the feds to be at odds, it does happen. ICE and other agencies might try to find ways around sanctuary status, but there is never any question of "treason" or "insurrection." Blue state politicians don't get raided or arrested as national enemies.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I bring up this issue because many readers have asked me to comment on the events at Mar-a-Lago and the FBI search of Donald Trump's home. From my research, every president in history has been given access to classified information after they leave the White House, especially if they are planning to run for office again. One can debate the merits of this policy, but it is a policy just the same. Presidents also have sweeping authority to declassify documents and information when they feel it is justified. Meaning, if documents were found in Trump's possession, it's completely plausible that he simply declassified them before taking them.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The main leftist position is more about the nuances of how the documents are stored and if Trump followed proper procedures through NARA. While the secondary argument by leftists is basically that Trump is a criminal and should not be allowed the same access as other presidents (though impeachment failed, and he has never been criminally charged). Until the information on the raid is unsealed, we really have no idea if Trump actually had any dangerous or top-secret documents in his possession. It's all hypothetical at this point and the progressive media is running wild with the story simply because they hate Trump and are hoping against hope that this event will stop him from running for office in 2024, where Biden would be easily crushed.</p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">My personal feeling on the issue is that people are missing the bigger picture. The Mar-a-Lago raid is much like the Jan. 6 trials. It's all a circus and a distraction. Nothing substantial will come from these actions, it's all about optics and influencing public perception. If anything, the raid on Trump's home actually makes him look MORE appealing to a large number of Americans, who have grown tired of the incompetence and chicanery of the Biden Administration. This event HELPS Trump in the long run instead of hurting him.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The only other possible scenario that makes sense here is that there will be an attempt to arrest Trump on thin charges. Such a move would be seen as purely political in nature and would enrage millions of Americans to the point of civil unrest. But maybe that's the goal...</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I have never had much trust in Trump, and I was always highly critical of the fact that he loaded his cabinet with known banking elites and globalists after attacking those same people during his election campaign. This article is not meant to defend Trump or admonish him. Frankly, I don't care.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">What I do care about, though, is the increasing tide of federal aggression and the use of federal agencies as a political club to intimidate or beat down opponents of the leftists and globalists. The FBI raid in Florida is one example, then there was <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/9677/242154/215d992dc1396ea868f1b228f6f1ea48a00b7142/26ec025039c160d842f901767c4c8aaecef0cdd6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">the FBI seizure of PA congressman Scott Perry's cellphone</a>, and the Jan. 6 investigations, in general, are purely about intimidation and not about justice.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The message of the Jan. 6 trials is this: Leftists are allowed to violently riot and burn buildings to the ground across the country. Conservatives are not allowed to do anything. If we do, then we will be rounded up for "insurrection." At least, that's what they want us to believe so that we self-censor and live in fear of ever protesting again. We are at an impasse. There is no diplomacy to be had and no agreements to be made. They want us gone, and now we want them gone because they want us gone. This is not going to change.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Another growing concern among many Americans is the sudden explosion in agent recruitment at the IRS, with an implied need for agents that are willing to execute raids and violence. The "Inflation Reduction Act" contains no measures to actually reduce inflation but does contain a climate change agenda, socialized health care measures and an extreme boost to the IRS.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The agency is slated to <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/9677/242154/c013963a76ae20ca17b55356811823c525b95c2f/26ec025039c160d842f901767c4c8aaecef0cdd6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">receive an $80 billion boost</a> from the Inflation Reduction Act and the institution is now looking to hire 87,000 more employees. If the mission is to reduce inflation by using the IRS to steal more money from American consumers, then I guess that could work, but it would also cause recessionary carnage and even more public discontent and anger.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Obviously, not all of the 87,000 new IRS agents will be field agents. Finding that many people with training who are also willing to risk their lives for the IRS would be exceedingly difficult. Many of them will be sitting at a desk, but thousands of them will be strapped and this is what worries people. The mainstream media claims that these new agents will be targeting "rich tax dodgers" but we all know better. The IRS was used extensively under Obama to put pressure on conservative organizations and individuals that were not "rich," and there's no reason to think Biden would not do the same thing.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/9677/242154/48a012d943f2f909e77a8de489cfcc26fac0832c/26ec025039c160d842f901767c4c8aaecef0cdd6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">IRS even had to apologize</a> to conservative groups for their over-scrutiny as part of a legal settlement in 2017.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They've done it before and they'll do it again, but this time with a massive payout from the Biden White House and probably more leeway to bend the law. So, with federal agencies being utilized more and more as political weapons, should conservative states step in and block their operations? Blue states do it, why not red states? This is an apples-to-apples comparison and absolutely fair. I would say that what blue states are doing with illegal immigrants is highly destructive in comparison to red states stopping alphabet agencies from using intimidation against conservatives who are legal citizens.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This question leads to a whole gamut of conflicts for sure, there will be endless cries by leftists of "treason." But who cares? We realize that there is a double standard and it's only expanding in the favor of social justice extremists that want to fundamentally disrupt and change the foundations of our country. Why should we play by their rules when they don't play by any?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Red states should enforce a moratorium on federal agency operations until the threats of political abuse are addressed. It is not possible to reach an understanding with leftists at this time because they operate through a lens of zealotry. They cannot be reasoned with because they believe that everything they are doing is righteous and anyone that stands against them is pure evil, so it is better to separate and prevent them from implementing biased policy within our state borders until the conflict is resolved.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,</p><p>BRANDON SMITH</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-23711467751134754882022-06-06T19:40:00.001-07:002022-06-06T19:40:04.515-07:00When equality doesn't mean equal and freedom doesn't mean free<p> <span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Everyone is equal under the law. But not everyone is equal. There are hundreds of ways we are not equal. Everything from differences in hair color, ambition, physical strength, competitiveness, mental focus, hand-eye coordination, allergies, musical talent and so on.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Is that unjust?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">[NO - because the way people are "equal under the law" is that, being humans with functioning brains and free-will choice and not animals, we all have the exact same right (to not be attacked first) and responsibility (to not attack thereby innocent other people first). So all is forbidden in advance unless and until very specifically agreed on, between all people at all levels of human interaction, from the individual through family to clan, tribe, and nation - and that includes even the largest groups or gangs, like "the state" and/or "the government" which is also not allowed to attack any of its real live human individual citizen component parts first. Therefore we enjoy "Innocent until proven guilty" and not the opposite, and how "Silence does NOT mean consent." Libertine "liberal" criminals, on the other hand, of course want the exact opposite, where under their brazen rule of chaos, all is allowed unless and until very specifically denied in advance, with the result that they can do whatever they want, when and where ever they want, to any and all people places and things they want to do it to, at will.]</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">;-)</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">So then, also YES, it is - if you are an elitist social engineer.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Constitutional-sounding words like "equality" and "social justice" are used to give apparent weight and legitimacy to the completely false premises being espoused. They have as much substance as the breath behind the words or smoke on the wind.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They are merely part of the elites' ploy to try to get people to equate things that are merely social constructs, or colloquial social mores, with actual law, the point of which is to have these phrases carry the weight of law and be used to keep us fighting each other.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Social engineers want diversity to become equated with law, and therefore become the de-facto law without anyone ever having voted on it. What a triumph of propaganda we are witnessing should this come to pass!</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If the elites get their way, without a vote, without due process, without one person in our Republic having an official voice in the matter, "social justice" and "rights" as defined by the immoral few — for example the so-called rights elitists want are in actuality special privileges – will have the force of law due to propaganda having succeeded in convincing people that there is no difference between constitutional law and unwritten social customs the elites want to force on everyone, even those with a different set of morals.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">So who are these enemies of the elites, with different customs and beliefs, and likely to find themselves on the receiving end of penalties imposed due to these non-laws?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The criminal political class has made it quite clear it is not themselves or their government functionaries. It is not the parasitic "taker" class, too distracted by bread and circus, Hollywood antics, amoral lifestyles, reality TV, and "politics," too easily swayed by slick oratory, fancy suits and promises of government largesse to recognize creeping totalitarianism enabled by the psychopath social engineers.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">No, those who will be held up as enemies of the State will be Americans who believe in the rule of the law, the Constitution, and freedom. We are always the target, you and I, because we think for ourselves and act independently. The elites want to stamp us out because we refuse to be controlled, dumbed down, tread upon.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">We also refuse to be homogenized, and "equalized." The elites, so intent on their versions of "justice" and "equality" want you to think they're intent on making sure no one is left behind. In reality, they are ensuring that no one gets ahead. But isn't that the goal of totalitarian regimes?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In 1776, our founding fathers declared, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It is necessary for us as right-thinking members of the Republic to separate ourselves from the social engineers. Otherwise, without anyone taking notice, their change agents will continue to distort key words in our language. This blunts, diminishes and distorts our thinking process to the great advantage of unseen authority.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I used to believe that the Bill of Rights was succumbing to tyranny at all levels of government. Now I believe that it is succumbing to self-imposed tyranny — imposed by the very people it is meant to protect and keep free.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This is a part of the "benevolent totalitarianism" I have been writing to you about. It is the "you asked for this" form of tyranny by those in power — uninformed consent by the masses. You begged us for gun control even though it's unconstitutional. You asked us to allow "social justice" even though it's unlawful and arbitrary.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Yours for the truth,<br /><br />Bob Livingston<br />Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-54202866647984987782022-05-04T14:55:00.007-07:002022-05-04T15:01:36.645-07:00The leftist war on free speech is part of a much bigger agenda<p><span style="font-size: large;"> From Brandon Smith of the Bob Livingston Personal Liberty Alerts</span></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTaMCyY6SwP3hyRxdI2jxSAVLSUCWPZ_jSCm7SgzT1TaSX1OZ5szds7bO53eq1uX61pw9c3HmN66TjcaJajg9dzEtZko8_gtyHD2sP7fIWiMGcxoyjha244uaUJFo3ulQ-YelurukqYwuy2aRoTuUbEACxQ0B5iPwZqlaItVYs5li_f8qxp1ly9A/s1024/Seal_of_the_United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security.svg.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1021" data-original-width="1024" height="638" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTaMCyY6SwP3hyRxdI2jxSAVLSUCWPZ_jSCm7SgzT1TaSX1OZ5szds7bO53eq1uX61pw9c3HmN66TjcaJajg9dzEtZko8_gtyHD2sP7fIWiMGcxoyjha244uaUJFo3ulQ-YelurukqYwuy2aRoTuUbEACxQ0B5iPwZqlaItVYs5li_f8qxp1ly9A/w640-h638/Seal_of_the_United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security.svg.png" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;">I think one of the most bizarre social developments of the past 10 years in the U.S. has been the slow but steady shift of the political left from supposed defenders of free speech to open aggression against it. The level of rationalization and mental gymnastics on display by leftists to justify their attacks on freedom and the First Amendment are bewildering. So much so that I begin to question if liberals and leftists ever actually had any respect for speech rights to begin with? </span></span></p><p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;">Or maybe the only freedom they cared about was the freedom to watch pornography?</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">One can see the steady progression of this war on speech and ideas, and the end game is predictable. Is anyone really that surprised that the Biden administration is implementing a Ministry of Truth in the form of the DHS Disinformation Governance Board? Can we just accept the reality at this point that leftists are evil and their efforts feed into an agenda of authoritarianism?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Before I get into this issue, I think it's important to point out that it's becoming tiresome to hear arguments these days suggesting that meeting leftists "somewhere in the middle" is somehow the best and most desirable option. I see this attitude all over the place and I think it comes from a certain naivety about the situation we find ourselves in as a country. Moderates and "normies" are finally starting to realize how bag-lady-crazy leftists are and the pendulum is swinging back slightly, but it was conservatives that were calling out the social justice cult and their highway to hell for years.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">There is no such thing as a "center" in our society anymore, either you lean conservative and you support freedom, or you lean left and support authoritarianism. There is no magical and Utopian in-between that we need to achieve to make things right. Also, no, there are no conservatives that support authoritarianism. There are fake GOP RINOS that are not conservative at all in rhetoric or in action; they do not represent conservatives in the slightest. Any Republican that goes against the basic tenets of constitutionalism, free markets, individual liberty, non-intervention in foreign entanglements and the protection of the founding principles of our country is not a conservative.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">We need to be clear about where the lines are drawn because sitting on the fence is not an option. Walk in the middle of the road? Get squished like a grape.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">To understand how leftists got to the point of enthusiastic hostility against free speech rights there are some psychological and ideological factors that need to be addressed. These are some of the ideals that leftists value that are disjointed or simply wrong:</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Hate Speech Is Real And Must Be Censored?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">First, as I have argued for many years, well before the social justice movement ever became a point of contention in the U.S., there is no such thing as "hate speech." There is speech that some people don't like and speech they are offended by. That is all.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Constitutionally there is no illegal hate speech. People are allowed to say any offensive thing they wish and believe however they wish as long as they are not slandering a person's reputation with lies or threatening them with direct bodily harm. If you are offended by criticism, that is your problem.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Leftists believe the opposite. They think that "hate speech" is illegal or should be illegal and that they should be the people that determine what hate speech is. This is a kind of magical door to power because if you can declare yourself the arbiter of hate speech you give yourself the authority to control all speech. That is to say, as a speech arbiter all you have to do is label everything you don't like as hate speech, no matter how factual, and you now dictate the course of society.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">No one is capable of this kind of objectivity or benevolence. No person alive has the ability to determine what speech is acceptable without bias. Like the One Ring in The Lord of The Rings, there is no individual or group capable of wielding such power without being corrupted by it. Either there is no hate speech, or everything becomes hate speech.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Free Speech Is Negated By Property Rights?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">This is in direct reference to social media websites and it's an oversimplification of the issue of free speech and large social media platforms. Here is the conundrum, or "false paradigm" if you will:</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Leftists argue for private property rights, but only when it comes to vast corporate big tech platforms like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. They like private property rights for companies that they think are on their side politically. </span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">They hate private property rights for everyone else. Just look at their response to Elon Musk's recent Twitter buyout; the leftists are demanding that Musk be stopped at all costs and demanding the SEC and FCC step in to disrupt the sale because they claim Musk's purchase is a "threat to democracy."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Why are Elon Musk's private property rights now less important or protected that the original shareholders of Twitter (Vangaurd, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley and a Saudi Prince)? Because Musk does not appear to represent leftist designs and interests. Leftists have no ideals or principles, they only care about control.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Beyond that irony, though, is the deeper issue of government intervention vs business rights. Is either side really trustworthy? The answer is no. Many people seem to think that government power is supposed to balance out corporate power when the truth is that governments and corporations work hand in hand; they are one in the same entity in many cases.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Twitter and other Big Tech platforms receive billions upon billions of dollars in government stimulus and tax incentives every year. Corporations as a concept are essentially a socialist creation. They enjoy limited liability and corporate personhood along with other special protections under government charter. With all these protections, incentives and stimulus measures, it is almost impossible for small and new businesses to compete with them. They represent a monopoly through cartel; they control the marketplace by colluding with each other and through support of the government itself.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">A perfect example of this would be the collusion between multiple Big Tech companies to bring down Parler, a conservative-leaning competitor to Twitter. This required some of the biggest companies on the planet working in unison along with the blessing of government to disrupt the ability of a new company to offer an alternative, and all because Parler was getting too big.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">In the case of a private person's home or small business, it's true that there are no free speech rights. They can kick you out and they don't have to give a reason. But when it comes to massive conglomerates that receive billions in our tax dollars in order to stay alive, no, they do not deserve private property rights. They have not made themselves into a public utility.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">This is a concept that leftists just don't grasp. Consider global corporation Disney and their open intention to undermine the passage of Florida's anti-grooming bill; this represented a vocal support for the sexualization and indoctrination of children in Florida schools. Leftists cheered the announcement and claimed that without Disney, Florida's economy would be wrecked. Instead, the state turned the tables and took away incentives they had been giving to Disney for decades. </span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Leftists responded by accusing Governor DeSantis of being a "fascist" and attacking free speech.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">But let's break this down: Leftists happily supported Disney, a massive conglomerate, and their efforts to undermine the will of the voters in Florida. The state government stops them from undermining the voters by taking away the money and special incentives that belong to the voters. In turn, leftists claim this is a violation of Disney's rights?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">No corporation, including Disney, is entitled to special incentives from government or the taxpayer. If they accept such incentives, then they must also accept that certain behaviors are unacceptable, including schemes to disrupt legal decisions within a state or country. The corporation is no longer private, it is partially public. This goes for Big Tech and social media platforms as well.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Censorship by these companies is not their right. They gave up that right when they took our money.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Disinformation Is A Threat And Censorship Is The Solution? </span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Governments and major corporations talking about the threat of "disinformation" is hilarious for a number of reasons, but mainly because traditionally it is the power brokers that have been the main purveyors of disinformation for a very long time. Suddenly today they care about the spreading of lies?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Rather, I think it is obvious that such people are far more worried about the spread of facts, evidence and truth. The institution of the Disinformation Governance Board is a clear indication that the establishment and the useful idiots on the political left are becoming desperate.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">They are losing their grip on the public mind, and we can see this in the results of their recent attempts to enforce medical tyranny across the country in the name of COVID. Luckily, conservatives in at least 20 red states fought against the implementation of COVID lockdowns, mandates and vaccine passports which would have annihilated our constitutional rights, perhaps forever.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">If you want to know what our country would look like had conservatives not stopped the tide of tyranny, just take a look at China today. They have some of the strictest COIVD mandates in the world and yet they are locking down millions yet again due to "high infection rates" and starving their own people in the process. It's madness, and it's exactly what leftists were arguing in favor of just a few months ago. The U.S. is mostly open today, just as red states like mine have been free for almost the entirety of the pandemic, and what has changed? Half the country is still unvaccinated and is there mass death in the streets? Nope. </span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Nothing has changed in terms of COVID. The mandates made no difference whatsoever, other than to disrupt the economy and reduce people's freedoms.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Not long ago, pointing out this fact was considered "disinformation" that needed to be silenced in order to "save lives." In other words, what the government and corporate oligarchs call "disinformation" today is eventually called reality tomorrow.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">It is not their job to protect the public from information, whether real or fake. It is not their job to filter or censor data or ideas. They are not qualified to do this. No one is. Leftists operate from a collectivist mentality, and this makes them believe that society is a singular entity that needs to be managed and manipulated to achieve a specific outcome. They support information control because facts and ideas outside of their narrative could possibly damage their narrative, and if the narrative is damaged, then they think society as a whole is damaged.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">That said, if your narrative is so fragile that it does not hold up to scrutiny or alternative viewpoints, then it must not be worth much of a damn, is it? If you have to force people or manipulate people into believing the way you do, then your ideology must be fundamentally flawed. The truth speaks volumes for itself and eventually wins without force. Only lies need to be forced into the collective consciousness.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Government lies in particular are the biggest threat to humanity, and their assertion that they should have the power to dictate what constitutes a "lie" is the biggest clown show of all time. Leftists love lies and use them constantly because they understand that lies are a form of sorcery. If told by the right people with the illusion of authority, lies can garner unlimited power from thin air. Power can only be derived by tricking other people into giving up control over themselves. Power is a trick in which the public is convinced to submit and become enslaved for the "greater good," even though freedom is the only greater good.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-size: large;">The collectivists live vicariously through government power. Leftists gain ecstasy through tyranny because the dominance of the hive mind is their dominance. They actually believe that if the system has ultimate power, they in turn have ultimate power. It is a mental disease that destroys everything in its path, and it is one that is actively encouraged by globalists and oligarchs. Leftist cultists serve their agenda, whether those leftists know it or not.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Brandon Smith</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">(And what's MY take on all this, you ask)? Simple!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Morality to honest people is sequential: "Who Started it?" But morality to hypocrites is only: "I'm Never Wrong - Fuck Your "FACTS!" And since they can't prove that to be right, all they've got left is offended subjective emotions and hurt feelings, and to call you names and insist you're always wrong (they don't try to prove them selves objectively right, because they know they can't - so they just stay on the victim-blaming offensive all the time, shallowly accusing their accusers of their own crimes)! Which explains censorship, too. They concentrate on banning the tactics ("ban all assault weapons!") FOR OTHERS, to divert </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">attention away from their own strategy ("always attack first")! This includes judges and all "Authorities!"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Attacking first, with whatever weapon, is the crime; using that same weapon, no matter what is is, to defend one's self and/or innocent others, is moral. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">But all "Authorities!" as professional hypocrites, will have none of that sequence-based 'logic' stuff!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">And since they're in charge, there are no consequences for them to continue to always double-down and never have to learn to change their minds, either. They're never wrong while you are always guilty until never proven innocent, peons!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">;-)</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-15372674640672593452022-04-20T09:55:00.002-07:002022-04-20T09:55:12.156-07:00Woke Twitter elitists are too stupid to realize Elon Musk is saving the platform<p> From Brandon Smith of the Bob Livingston Personal Liberty Alerts</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFsZFihk04rd3dDx-lm-s-WCPJP28_Fja2hssTGeDae_KJlFv8odVWUqajSspVBaWpp7XxjZ3OA_do67tgblWvw31D9-UR2i19Jz58qiLQZCJDbpXlfWpJymYeGLI2nEGNhgvLp8HySh_dGdVFbmTRdxsY4gUqE5iHUjZX5ZCVjVV39a4tLo5ckg/s1500/TwitterIsEvil.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="750" data-original-width="1500" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFsZFihk04rd3dDx-lm-s-WCPJP28_Fja2hssTGeDae_KJlFv8odVWUqajSspVBaWpp7XxjZ3OA_do67tgblWvw31D9-UR2i19Jz58qiLQZCJDbpXlfWpJymYeGLI2nEGNhgvLp8HySh_dGdVFbmTRdxsY4gUqE5iHUjZX5ZCVjVV39a4tLo5ckg/w640-h320/TwitterIsEvil.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Twitter is a bit of an enigma. The social media company has gone from a relatively innocuous space for people to mostly market online businesses and for politicians and celebrities to engage with their followers or detractors, to a vicious battleground overrun with leftist zealots hellbent on using the platform as a weapon to silence dissent and destroy the lives of people that disagree with them. If I was to describe what Twitter really stands for today, I would say it is an attempt to build a global hive mind; a place where everyone is coerced into conformity with establishment ideals through peer pressure and mob aggression.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In other words, Twitter is the antithesis of a free-speech society. A beta test for the future of authoritarianism where you think you are allowed to speak your mind but only the "correct" opinions are allowed to pass.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">How this happened is hard to say. Some theorize that leftist cultists scrambled like rats from the sinking ship of Tumblr and found their way over to Twitter to take up residency. I would argue that maybe Twitter was always intended to become what it now is. Just take a look at the monster's gallery of its largest shareholders.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There's Vanguard and Blackrock, which together represent a globalist vampire squid of epic proportions. Their tentacles are wrapped around almost every aspect of the economy including media, big pharma (including Pfizer), weapons manufacturers, huge swaths of the U.S. housing market, etc. If these two mega conglomerates were to somehow be wiped off the face of the Earth tomorrow, the world would be a much better place. For now, they own almost everything.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then there is Morgan Stanley, another "too big to fail" international banking firm that for some reason has a major stake in the realm of "tweets." Whenever globalist companies like these pursue major investments in a communications platform there is generally something nefarious afoot. And it should be noted that almost all the media companies they own push an agenda that leans hard left and is authoritarian in nature. We witnessed this undeniable dynamic in the past two years as media companies attacked anyone that stood against the illegal covid mandates.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Why do major globalist institutions have so much interest in Twitter? It's not because Twitter is a moneymaker. <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8329/242154/cb0895e80b468350d81f80e9fb829e78e5ce23b6/50587e10ddff493f8664d490284a7ef9c7d8fc7b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">In 2020 the company suffered a net income loss of over $1.14 billion.</a> <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8329/242154/fd8a376d0550c5f8d5f157d8f89dd76cac531260/50587e10ddff493f8664d490284a7ef9c7d8fc7b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">In 2021 there was an income loss of $221 million.</a> Twitter still claims it earns a profit, but this is primarily derived from stock buybacks and state and federal government subsidies, meaning, without overnight loans from the Federal Reserve and tax breaks from government Twitter simply would not exist.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Twitter is carrying a debt load of around $6.75 billion in total liabilities according to The Wall Street Journal, with a dismal stock performance until the pandemic which led to trillions in stimulus dollars flooding into equities markets. Now that the covid checks have dried up, the company's stock has spiraled down yet again. The only thing propping it up today is the sudden prospect of an Elon Musk buyout.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8329/242154/993165a1e2ba0444ddb93dda1d3672a54968a819/50587e10ddff493f8664d490284a7ef9c7d8fc7b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Twitter was bleeding users</a> and was dealing with a declining membership base leading up to 2019 when the company decided it would fix the problem by not reporting traditional user numbers anymore. They shifted to a new metric that they claimed was designed to discount the removal of "spam and bot accounts." One has to wonder how much of Twitter's actual user base is made of real people rather than fake accounts? Even with the new metrics, evidence suggests they have continued to lose users and revenues since 2019, largely due to the hostile political witch hunt environment that Twitter has developed in the past few years.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8329/242154/964ec5d6efb164d38cb384d5e627d346b1123b45/50587e10ddff493f8664d490284a7ef9c7d8fc7b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">The U.S. government has also been heavily invested in Twitter over the years</a>, throwing millions into various projects the company has undertaken including many overseas. This makes sense because Twitter regularly shares user data with government agencies, often while claiming they don't. Surveillance requests are kept secret and any release of information on <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8329/242154/58426e3e99ee0efd936a7f4242d29747d6cb74c6/50587e10ddff493f8664d490284a7ef9c7d8fc7b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">such requests are blocked by U.S. courts.</a></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Overall, Twitter is a cesspool of political and corporate corruption. A sock puppet of massive globalist shareholders and a data clearinghouse for conglomerates and governments alike. This is why I have never had an account with them, and likely never will.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It boggles my mind how all of these facts can be right out in the open, yet the one thing that sends leftists on Twitter into a rage is the notion that Elon Musk might buy up enough stock in the company to determine its future course. Here are some key facts that I think the Twitter elites need to consider:</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">1) Twitter has been on a downward plunge in terms of user base and revenues for years now. The fact that the company's board has decided to assert a leftist political agenda and enforce unbalanced censorship rules is killing the company even further. In a few years, Twitter will not exist. Or, if it does, it will be a shell of its former self much like Myspace or Tumblr. The platform you people think you control is dying. Without fair public discourse and equally enforced guidelines Twitter serves no purpose other than to act as an echo chamber for leftist fanatics, and who wants to be a party to that?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">2) The Twitter cult and their "blue checkmark" gatekeepers are losing their minds over the prospect of a "billionaire" taking over Twitter when in reality the platform has been controlled by the world’s richest and most invasive shareholders for a long time. If you think Vanguard or BlackRock are better stewards than Elon Musk then I suggest you do a little more research on the history of these corporations.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">3) Elon Musk's interest in Twitter has stirred up excitement in a platform that was otherwise destined for the dumpster. I might even suggest that Musk's activities are prolonging Twitter's life span by drawing in investments that never would have been there otherwise. The blue checkmarks should be thanking him instead of attacking him.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">4) What is the primary complaint that Twitter elitists have when it comes to Musk? That he might bring in more fair and balanced rules which would prevent political censorship. In other words, they are angry because he might allow true free speech within the boundaries of legality for conservatives as well as leftists. This is unacceptable to them. In their minds, free speech is only reserved for those with "correct thinking," and they believe they get to dictate what "correct thinking" is. It takes a special kind of evil to believe that their side is the only side of an issue that deserves to be heard.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In terms of Elon Musk, I'm reserving judgment for now. Tesla and SpaceX receive billions in government subsidies and tax incentives, far more than Twitter does. I question the validity of any company that relies on government handouts in order to survive.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Musk also is an attendee of the World Government Summit in Dubai, where globalists from various nations meet to talk about the agenda for global centralization. Musk's discussion was specifically on how <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8329/242154/dfd0ddbf1ac44b67ea024e9e7c7540d58e94887d/50587e10ddff493f8664d490284a7ef9c7d8fc7b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">he thinks the future of humanity is to "merge with machines,"</a> much like having your cellphone attached to your brain. This sounds like a dystopian nightmare to me; governments already track and monitor cellphone activity, do you really want them to do the same with your brain?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Setting all that aside, Musk's surprising pursuit of Twitter is interesting no matter which way it goes. He could take control and shut the whole thing down, which is what I would suggest given the platform is a cancer on society and rife with government and corporate surveillance. Scattering the blue check cult to the four winds would be one of the best gifts Musk could give the world right now. They can always complain about everything on other platforms, just not with so much concentrated corporate power at their disposal.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Musk could sell his nearly 10 percent share in the company and trigger a massive plunge in the stock price. This might even precipitate a faster end to the platform. Then again, he may continue to buy up shares and find a way around Twitter's "poison pill" initiative. In fact, in the back of my conspiracy brain, I wonder if Musk is actually saving Twitter rather than changing it or destroying it?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The company was entering the doldrums; its life expectancy was waning quickly. The influence of the Twitter mob has been decreasing and their ability to harm others is disappearing. Big tech companies are like sharks. They must keep moving forward in order to grow and survive. Twitter's momentum has been dead for some time. Maybe it is better to let them rot in their own filth rather than try to resurrect and revitalize a corpse?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Regardless of Musk's true intentions, something needs to change dramatically when it comes to Big Tech and social media in the west. These companies live on our tax dollars and government incentives and yet they get to enjoy the protections of limited liability and the auspices of "private businesses." They are publicly funded in many respects, but they claim the right to censor whoever they wish for any reason they wish. Any business that tries to directly compete with them is crushed, either by collusion between multiple corporations or collusion with governments. This is the epitome of monopoly and the complete opposite of free markets.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If Musk can throw a monkey wrench into the existing system then I hope he's successful; the majority of the public is on his side if that's the case. There is also the possibility that he is helping Twitter to survive. Even support from Vanguard, Blackrock and the seventh circle of hell has not been able to keep Twitter from going down the tubes, but the branding and personality power of Musk could keep the company alive.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">My point is, if the leftists want to keep their favorite platform they will need Musk to do it. And beyond that, conservatives and moderates should also not put too much faith in any billionaire to accomplish a sea-change in social media. We are already winning by simply not playing the game. If Musk brings down or upends Twitter, great. If not, it's no loss. Just let them continue to crumble.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,</p><p>Brandon Smith</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-7302850269988117312022-04-18T13:44:00.001-07:002022-04-18T13:44:04.654-07:00War in Ukraine and beyond — because the Globalists can never get enough<p> From Bob Livingston, 18 April 2022</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggXVMhh9z7632DfxSi0oTcYG1qhaTjI3DUEfBFfKaFEBGmU2gYFrZZSLG6AuYEtBdiTOwr7ILf2NiXfLX1lxyy5KSEId1U6vg8HvbcR98vMrEfPRQjCW3wTB-kprX-DA7wXW9MbHkWIr7ZwfT-S7MuePIhp-GU4_0NnXB8Qe9_0Z4A7YewUAQYGA/s699/Sheeple2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="553" data-original-width="699" height="506" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggXVMhh9z7632DfxSi0oTcYG1qhaTjI3DUEfBFfKaFEBGmU2gYFrZZSLG6AuYEtBdiTOwr7ILf2NiXfLX1lxyy5KSEId1U6vg8HvbcR98vMrEfPRQjCW3wTB-kprX-DA7wXW9MbHkWIr7ZwfT-S7MuePIhp-GU4_0NnXB8Qe9_0Z4A7YewUAQYGA/w640-h506/Sheeple2.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Council on Foreign Relations would have you believe that they and their puppet world "leaders" feel something terrible is afoot in Ukraine — and that "Russia" is the bad guy — because there is a war going on. They claim it must stop, and offer supposed solutions to the crisis on its website and in press reports.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Don't be fooled. These globalists love war.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">What they do not love is that you might remember who is behind it all by recalling a bit of recent history. The U.S. State Department and the CIA orchestrated the ouster of a legitimately elected government in Ukraine at the behest of the International Monetary Fund, and the U.S. then looted Ukraine's gold reserves and installed a puppet regime, leaving the region in chaos and the U.S. and Russia on the verge of war.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Elected Ukrainian pro-Russia President Viktor Yanukovych was ousted after he rejected the International Monetary Fund's demands to raise taxes and devalue the currency. So the U.S. and the EU installed central banker and hand puppet Arseniy "Yats" Yatsenyuk. A <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/5e969144087b52c9caadbb7300704246a4025a54/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Forbes article</a> described Yats as "... the kind of technocrat you want if you want austerity, with the veneer of professionalism. He's the type of guy who can hobnob with the European elite... unelected and willing to do the IMFs bidding."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In the wee hours of the morning, the U.S. took possession of Ukraine's $1.8 billion (estimated value) <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/7ba23f4b5b4df29757929f9b9a310decc3fcd1d9/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">gold reserves</a>. That's partial payback for the $5 billion the U.S. invested in dragging Ukraine toward the EU.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The looting continued as Vice President Joe Biden's son took a position with <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/5f612603f8aa20586bdc54e68d348454de54421e/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Ukraine's largest private gas producer</a>. Yet it's a "conspiracy" to think that now-president Joe Biden was in any way guilty of any improper dealings in Ukraine while he was vice president.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">You are not supposed to wonder about Ukrainian investigators catching representatives of the Burisma Oil Company, a company where Hunter Biden sat on the board of directors, "paying a $6 million bribe to the Ukrainian Anti-Corruption Burea (NABU) to get the NABU to shut down the investigation into political graft and corruption by the Ukrainian government that benefitted Burisma," according to published <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/fb09bbb9558cfb9021a8a3891ac3f9e5ba6b76d7/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">reports</a>.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">You are supposed to believe that many Western leaders and major bodies that give financial support to Ukraine also wanted the prosecutor in the Burisma case dismissed because they believed <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/3b3085fadc6709bb7fee4dc542a6150a0ada822f/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">he was not</a> "active enough in tackling corruption."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">You are not supposed to remember that Democrats impeached then-sitting president Donald Trump <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/1ffc398f1017b2b82b1def3a0c4abfaac4dc9e8f/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">because they claimed he</a> "withheld military aid to Ukraine in pressuring the newly elected Volodymyr Zelensky government to investigate Hunter Biden's recent role as a Burisma board member."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">You are not supposed to remember that Biden himself <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/d2fea7442b3e84e45305ad0e578259d65ef2f17e/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">bragged</a> about withholding Ukraine aid to the very Council on Foreign Relations I just mentioned, back in 2019.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">You are supposed to gloss over the fact that in 2017, pool reporters were summoned at 11:20 a.m. for what they assumed would be a photo op of Trump and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in the Oval Office. What they found was Trump seated beside the fossilized old war criminal, former NeverTrumper, long-time Council on Foreign Relations denizen and neocon war-making kingpin, Henry Kissinger.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">From the report:</p><p> <span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">POTUS, wearing a dark suit and red striped tie, said he met with Kissinger to talk "about Russia and various other matters."</span></p><blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"We're talking about Syria and I think that we're going to do very well with respect to Syria and things are happening that are really, really, really positive," Trump added. "We're going to stop the killing and the death."</p></blockquote><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Kissinger knows a thing or three about "killing and death." But not much, it seems, about how to stop it, and he did not in this case, either... as if that were ever the goal. Quite the opposite, I hope you now suspect.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Previous perturbations</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The U.S. has been meddling in Ukraine for quite some time, and the powder keg almost blew in 2014, as Paul Craig Roberts wrote then, "I doubt that the <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/2935a39469e6f2b1c35b37fa16d2d0b619579458/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Ukraine crisis</a> precipitated by Washington's overthrow of the democratic government is over. Washington has won the propaganda war everywhere outside of Russia and Ukraine itself. Within Ukraine, people are aware that the coup has made them worse off. Crimea has already separated from the U.S. puppet government in Kiev and rejoined Russia. Other parts of Russian Ukraine could follow."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">No one believes that Western Ukraine wants anything to do with Russia and that Putin is lying, and yet Ron Paul pointed out, again, during the original Ukraine unrest in 2014, "The current conflict stems from a divide between western Ukraine, which seeks a closer association with the European Union; and the eastern part of the country, which has closer historic ties to Russia.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"The usual interventionists in the U.S. have long meddled in the internal affairs of Ukraine. In 2003 it was U.S. government money that helped finance the Orange Revolution, as U.S.-funded NGOs favoring one political group over the other were able to change the regime. These same people have not given up on Ukraine. They keep pushing their own agenda for Ukraine behind the scenes, even as they ridicule anyone who claims U.S. involvement.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"A recent leaked telephone conversation between two senior government officials made it clear that not only was the U.S. involved in the Ukrainian unrest, the U.S. was actually seeking to determine who should make up the next Ukrainian government!"</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Russians amassed their forces on the Ukraine border and the Ukrainians called Putting a "fascist" for his actions in Crimea.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Does any of this sound familiar to you? It should. Which leads one to wonder why the members of the CFR are surprised that it has come to war? They are not, no matter what revisionist propaganda they write on their website.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">My colleague Brandon Smith, if you recall, wrote: "In Ukraine, we find the globalists creating tensions between the West and the East. Russia's most vital naval base sits in Crimea, an autonomous state tethered to the Ukrainian mainland. Currently, Russia has flooded Crimea with troops in response to the regime change in Ukraine. The new Ukrainian government (backed by NATO) has called this an "invasion" and an act of war, while Western warmongers like McCain and Lindsay Graham spread <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/33f1d726fcca300e2673a3d24999379d04e9363d/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">the propaganda meme</a> that Russia made such a move only because Putin believes the Obama Administration to be 'weak.' Clearly, the idea here is to engineer either high tensions or war between Russia and the United States. Syria failed to produce the desired outcome, so Ukraine was tapped instead."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Created conflict</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Ukraine has been "tapped" as a pawn many times. The Terror-Famine struck Ukraine in 1932-33 when as many as 10 million starved. It should come as little surprise that Joseph Stalin was the architect of that tragedy.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Stalin unleashed his secret police (NKVD, which became the KGB, which became the FSB, from whence Vladimir Putin came) targeting capitalists and squeezing greater food production from the suffering peasants. In the 1930s, when quotas could not be met in the face of drought, the NKVD ruthlessly robbed Ukraine of its wheat and packed the grain back to Russia.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Seemingly any time there is unrest or trouble in Russia, Ukraine pays the price, just as it did during the massive heatwave, drought, and wheat crisis back in 2010. It is no coincidence that Crimea became a flashpoint as Russians faced starvation.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It's becoming increasingly obvious that the Ukraine situation has always been an orchestrated crisis. It's directed history <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8282/242154/6935f1defd392f476185fd545e0cc516ecd15688/3b798bf8f1626a4a126c995f0545239c1c90057b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">orchestrated by the globalists</a>. Ukrainians will likely end up like Iraqis and Libyans, destitute and living in a lawless society, with anyone filling the void who will foment more war for profit.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Putin and Biden are merely pieces on the globalist chessboard. Empires and wars throughout history have been built and fomented upon myths and deception.<br /><br />Yours for the truth,<br /><br />Bob Livingston<br />Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter<span style="vertical-align: text-top;">®</span></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-23713043063451559872022-04-14T09:28:00.004-07:002022-04-14T09:28:23.782-07:00Is Separation and a New, More Perfect Union, Inevitable?<p> From Brandon Smith and Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty Alerts Newsletter Feb 7, 2022:</p><p><span style="background-color: white; color: #26282a; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-weight: 700;">Separation or purge? Sharing a society with the political left is impossible</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If you really think about it, of all the social drivers in history the concept of freedom is the most powerful and fascinating. There are many observable objective truths in the world and it's always important to recognize them, but the idea of freedom is rarer because it is a universal subjective truth. Meaning, it exists inherently in the majority of individuals. Most of us share this experience but there is no microscope or telescope in existence that can observe that experience. We just have to trust it, or perhaps, have faith.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">We can only see the aftereffects of the human experience of freedom in the great upheavals that occur when our societies become too rigid, too controlled and too authoritarian. Some will argue that tyrants have no concept of freedom, and this debunks the notion that it's an inherent psychological quality, but this is a misconception. Many tyrants love freedom, but only for themselves. Like any obsessive compulsive, when the average tyrant sees free movement within the rest of society all he sees is chaos that needs to be micro-managed. He is so mentally unhinged by the existence of independent activity that he is compelled to crush it and impose his brand of "order."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If you want to understand the thinking process of the political left today, this is where you need to start. They believe only certain special people deserve to have freedom, and they are of course part of that group. The rest of us can't be trusted with freedom because we "think the wrong way," and so we need to be corralled and fenced in.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This is not to say that some structure within society is wrong, it can be a good thing, but not when it is imposed by an elitist minority of psychopathic people. There will never be any justice within such a system, no fairness and no true progress. Authoritarianism is the opposite of progress; it is the antithesis, and yet these people call themselves "progressives."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Freedom requires boldness and courage because it demands personal responsibility. When you are free to make your own decisions, you are also free to fail, and only you can be blamed for your own failures. This is a terrifying notion for most leftists and collectivists because they believe that they are owed a positive outcome regardless of their actions or merit. They believe it is their "right" to be taken care of by others if they are incapable of taking care of themselves, but this is not equality, this is "equity." This is stealing wealth and opportunity from more worthy people in order to artificially inflate others that put in little or no effort.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Meritocracy is the most equal system in existence because it is freedom based; equality of opportunity is the epitome of fairness, equity of outcome is the epitome of injustice.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists hyperfocus on race, skin color and sexual identity for this very reason. They are desperately searching for a way to circumvent the obstacles of freedom and merit. If everything in society is based on race, then personal accomplishment and responsibility are no longer relevant. In the mind of the leftist, if certain people are inherently oppressed and others are inherently oppressive, then equality of opportunity is not enough, and equity of outcome must be enforced. Making everything about victim group status thereby erases freedom, and meritocracy cannot function. All a person needs to do is say "I am oppressed; therefore I am entitled," and if they meet the leftist criteria then they are handed a livelihood or success simply because they exist.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I saw a commercial on YouTube yesterday for yet another social justice documentary about "white people" and our supposed reign of dominance over the world and I could not help but think this entire narrative is nothing more than a cowardly attempt to deflect responsibility. Yes, it's also an attempt to divide and conquer western nations but how many people are actually watching these race hyped movies and TV shows un-ironically? According to the stats and reviews, there aren't very many.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Nearly every claim made in these productions is based on previously debunked social justice misrepresentations of history from books like White Fragility and movements like the 1619 Project. If you really want to get an accurate representation of U.S. history in particular and the limited role slavery played in terms of modern social outcomes, then I suggest reading the works of Thomas Sowell, a black American economist and historian with no bias in his analysis.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Slavery is a mere footnote in our past, not an all-encompassing determinant of our present and future as leftists like to argue. There is no legal slavery in America today, and there is no one alive today in America who has experienced race-based slavery or that has been affected by it. Slavery and racism were far more pervasive in nations of brown and black people in history. In fact, some of these countries still engage in various forms of slavery today. White people are not the problem, people who disrespect the benefits of freedom are the problem regardless of their skin color.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">What we need to understand is that race and oppression propaganda are not really rooted in race and oppression. They appeal to a certain subset of our population because it offers them a way to rationalize their lack of merit and their fears of freedom and consequence. If you can blame white people for all your problems and have this be believed, then the temptation to fail is increased because there are no consequences. Why work hard to make something of yourself if you can do nothing and be rewarded for it?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">By extension, the racism blame game is alluring to many in society because it can be used as a weapon to harm political enemies. When leftists complain about the evils of "white people" what they are really talking about are the "evils" of conservatives and others that do not conform to the leftist ideology. They rarely come right out and say it, but one day the documentaries will switch from Dear White People to Dear Conservatives. The fight has never been about race, it's always been about ideals and principles and eliminating the ideals leftists do not like. This is why they are consistently hostile to anyone conservative, even more so if that person is black.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The leftist agenda is all about diminishing freedom and societal respect for freedom by whatever means necessary. Everything is about management, everything is about centralization, everything is about control. Conservatives and many moderates stand in direct opposition to this.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The most common and idiotic argument I hear among newbies in the liberty movement is when they try to explain away leftist actions by bringing up the "false left/right paradigm." These people don't understand what this actually means. The left/right paradigm exists at the top of the social and political pyramid; top political and corporate leaders pretend to be in one party or the other while in reality they are all working together and implementing the same policies. At the bottom of the pyramid among regular people, there is no false left/right paradigm. There is a very real left/right division.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This is undeniable now in the face of the COVID and vaccine mandates. For the longest time, I have heard people claim that when the push for authoritarianism in the U.S. arrived many conservatives would simply go along with it. Yet, today numerous conservative red states are fighting the mandates tooth and nail while leftist blue states are being suffocated by them. In fact, red states have acted as beacons of rebellion for the world. Without them, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court would have dropped Biden's federal vax mandates. The threat of war is tangible if such mandates are ever instituted, and the Supreme Court knows this.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I have had people ask me in the past why there haven't been any major actions on the part of conservatives in the U.S. against the mandates and I have to break it to them that there are no mandates in conservative places and there haven't been for at least 18 months. None. Zero. Zip. We don't need to protest because we stopped the mandates before they could take hold.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">As I have said from the very beginning of the pandemic response, if even a handful of places can remain free from COVID controls they will inspire people around the world and act as proof that the mandates are pointless. Today, as America continues to beat back the COVID agenda there are mass protests in Canada and the UK has cut all COVID restrictions. Freedom spreads like wildfire once the flames are sparked.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Leftists hate this. COVID, like the fantasy of "institutional racism," is a tempting vehicle to forward their agenda. If you can convince the public that they are a threat to themselves and each other, then it is a small matter to convince them that government needs to step in and protect society from itself and from notions of freedom that might put society at risk. Without COVID as a foil, the political left has nothing, and so they continue to perpetuate the lie that the virus is an imminent threat to the majority of people when the average Infection Fatality Rate is a tiny 0.27 percent.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The real question here is when a group of people hate freedom this much how is it possible to coexist with them? The answer is we can't.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Anyone who defends merit and liberty will always be a target of those that despise merit and liberty. They will never stop. They will forever be looking for ways to undermine both. If COVID mandates and race-based propaganda don't work then they will search for another tool to do the job. If one can say anything "good" about leftists, it's that they do not give up even when they are clearly outmatched and beaten. The problem is that this dedication to their cause is not based on love or passion, but in zealotry. They are jihadists, and nothing, not logic, not facts, not reason nor moral principle will convince them of the error of their ways.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">So, what is the solution? One could suggest that we make it easy for them to leave. After all, if they hate America as much as they say they do then why are they still living here? Probably because most other places in the world are abysmal in comparison. But if we keep them around, they will drag the country down to the same level. It's a conundrum. Beyond that, what country would want them? Social justice is seen as a cancer in many countries and an injection of leftist migrants would be a disaster for them economically and socially, even in nations that claim to support leftist models.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Most leftists would also refuse to take the opportunity to leave because they believe they should decide the path of America's future. As much as they hate this country, they see themselves as its saviors.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then there is the option of internal separation, which I see as preferable. This is already happening in many forms as conservatives and moderates from blue states relocate by the millions to red states. In my home state of Montana, there has been an influx of migrants from blue states and every single new person I have talked to is a conservative/prepper whose family lived in a blue state for generations, and they finally got fed up. The vast majority of people moving are conservative-minded and they are congregating in the red states.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Why not carry this process forward to its natural conclusion? Red states break from blue states and red counties break from blue state control and we live our lives the way we see fit. Let the leftists continue with their draconian economic and political models and see how well that goes for them. I guarantee they will be in financial ruins within a decade (the list of most indebted places in the country is dominated by blue states) and they will be begging to return to a union with red states (except for the zealots, which would lose influence as they continue to fail).</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">But this will not happen peacefully because, again, leftists cannot tolerate free activity. Their OCD will not allow them to be content with living in a collectivist state of their own; all states must be collectivist before they are satisfied. People are property to them; property of the collective, and people who are property cannot be allowed to make decisions without oversight.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Unfortunately, the only path this leaves is one of violence. Leftists will have to be forced out of positions of power and influence and removed from our culture like a cancerous tumor is cut from the body to save the body. I don't think this should be the obvious choice. I don't want it to be. What I am saying is, leftists and their partners in government and the corporate world will force the issue because they cannot help it; like the story of the scorpion and the frog, it's in their nature to destroy.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">They will continue to push and steal and threaten and abuse until they get the inevitable response of a punch in the teeth. Then, they will play the victim like they always do. This crying and gaslighting will have to be ignored. In the end, these people cannot be tolerated in a free culture and their means of harming and enslaving others must be removed, one way or another.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,<br /><br />Brandon Smith</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-46030237254974421562022-04-14T02:32:00.004-07:002022-04-14T02:38:17.834-07:00Simple fixes to our economic problems that (((establishment elites))) won't allow<p> From Brandon Smith of The Bob Livingston Personal Liberty Alerts</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaE925cW93K21oGNiFkHfdT6NNpsVT0VcirO0c6qhUW6hgYaVQqJ1McuwOstQz22-vYjvtwozVAGYJOe3by6DCaBrO-acRPl3l74I--t6A1Ma_fcA_jyGB5dz8r0AP5vjh1AwZlYE5DMPXqTmMYAV0ngmPKZzRLYFNpJlRUVGk3cYdBFGSE2sw6w/s1024/DebtSlaves.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="576" data-original-width="1024" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaE925cW93K21oGNiFkHfdT6NNpsVT0VcirO0c6qhUW6hgYaVQqJ1McuwOstQz22-vYjvtwozVAGYJOe3by6DCaBrO-acRPl3l74I--t6A1Ma_fcA_jyGB5dz8r0AP5vjh1AwZlYE5DMPXqTmMYAV0ngmPKZzRLYFNpJlRUVGk3cYdBFGSE2sw6w/w640-h360/DebtSlaves.png" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;">I think one of the great misconceptions about the economic crisis is that solutions are always dependent on centralized government action. In truth, most financial disasters are actually caused by too much government action and involvement. This is not to overlook the fact that central banks like the Federal Reserve are also primer culprits; their machinations which are independent of government oversight fall into the category of deliberate sabotage, as I outlined in last week's article. Basically, the Fed bankrolls the corruption through fiat money creation while government officials and corporations utilize the money to wreak havoc on our living standards.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Ending the Fed would solve the fiat money problem, but there's still a host of agenda-driven politicians and bureaucrats to deal with before our nation can right the ship.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Really, the best way to fix our system would be to first force the government to interfere less. As a point of reference, consider the common media narratives surrounding the COVID pandemic. Along with the White House, the media has been the premier driver of irrational fear over the spread of COVID, which ended up being a minor threat compared to the hype as the median Infection Fatality Rate was no more than 0.27 percent. Yet, in response to this nothing-burger bureaucrats declared a national emergency requiring insane and unconstitutional lockdowns.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The lockdowns damaged the economy in ways people are only now beginning to comprehend, with hundreds of thousands of small businesses lost across the country. Not only that, but in response to the economic implosion the elites created, they then created over $6 trillion in new money through the Fed in a single year. This helicopter money or UBI (Universal Basic Income) has expedited a stagflationary disaster and helped to push prices on necessities to 40-year highs.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The media claims it was "COVID that caused the crash," but this is a lie. It was the response to COVID that caused the crash. The virus was merely incidental to the economic sabotage by governments and central banks. As we saw in conservative red states that defied the lockdowns and the vax mandates, economic activity thrived while leftists blue states suffered. And what did these blue states get in return for their economic sacrifices? Nothing. COVID infections continued to rage in blue states and deaths often outpaced red states with similar-sized populations.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In other words, the lockdowns, the mask mandates and the attempts to force vaccinations through medical tyranny saved zero lives and possibly made things worse. This is the legacy of government micro-management (And yes, let's not forget that Trump went along with these lockdowns at the beginning of the pandemic also. Biden is just the dirt-bag that continued the measures despite the massive amount of evidence that they don't work).</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">While the COVID event illustrates my point in a big way, there are a lot of more subtle problems that government intervention has caused that add up to one big fiscal calamity. Many of these threats require relatively simple solutions that government elites will rarely address and will try to stop at all costs. Here are just a few examples...</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Inflation and stagflation? Back the dollar with hard commodities</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Federal Reserve and their minions have spent the better part of a century trying to convince the public that a gold standard for our currency is what caused the Great Depression and what could cause future depressions. They claim that limitations on money printing strangle liquidity and disrupt velocity. This is a lie.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Former Fed chairman <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8275/242154/5fea9d245e63871b31939d24acee2839f09f8004/89e51c384ca4c17e5c3ec8c223759397c5ca893c" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Ben Bernanke openly admitted</a> in 2002 in a speech in honor of Milton Friedman that it was the central bank that actually caused the deflationary collapse of the 1930s, not the existence of the gold standard. This rare moment of truth from a fed official was perhaps due to the sheer amount of evidence that Friedman often cited that contradicted the original anti-gold propaganda. Or maybe it happened because the banking elites did not see Friedman as a particular threat and figured no one among the public would read Bernanke's speech anyway.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In fact, a commodities foundation held the U.S. economy together for centuries until the Fed came along and the government slowly began removing gold from the picture. All subsequent economic crisis events have been exponentially worse ever since. When a commodities standard is employed, stability always follows. Just look at what has happened in Russia recently; their currency was on a downward spiral due to international sanctions, yet, when they reopened markets this past week the Ruble skyrocketed back to normal. Why? Because Putin had the currency coupled with gold. It's really that simple.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The U.S. and parts of Europe are facing their own inflationary disasters, and this is largely due to the unchecked avarice of central bank stimulus and government spending. The only way to secure the dollar's existence as a stable store of wealth would be to back it with hard commodities like precious metals (among others). This might kill the dollar's world reserve status because fiat printing would be impossible from that point on, but I got a news flash for those that hate the idea of grounding the dollar in commodities: We're going to lose world reserve status anyway, and it's going to happen soon.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">One third of the world's population including Russia, China and India are already breaking from the dollar in bilateral trade. The U.S. might as well accept this as the reality and prepare to mitigate the coming currency collapse by supporting the dollar with commodities.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Oil shortages and energy inflation? Stop interfering with oil exploration</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In early February of this year, the Biden administration made legal filings that <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8275/242154/60356e21597cc33082eb1eabfe89d21af770a187/89e51c384ca4c17e5c3ec8c223759397c5ca893c" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">halted new oil and gas leases</a> including exploration due to conflicts over "climate costs." This interference with America's oil independence is only one of many instances starting with <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8275/242154/12a328c4a73e5d93a847d9e88c6ee387e3222e40/89e51c384ca4c17e5c3ec8c223759397c5ca893c" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Biden's sabotage of the Keystone Pipeline</a> in 2021. Interestingly, with gas prices doubling ever since Biden entered office, the White House now claims that they have nothing to do with energy inflation and are not preventing drilling in the U.S.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">During the same period, Russia was establishing a 30-year oil and gas contract with China and laying the groundwork for a major pipeline to be finished by 2025. Russia was planning ahead while the U.S. was shifting from energy independence and a net exporter of oil, to once again becoming dependent on authoritarian regimes in the Arab world. Why?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Biden's excuse is usually climate alarmism. <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/8275/242154/4250de67e12d7212206c912ad6f6e37f0e0623b4/89e51c384ca4c17e5c3ec8c223759397c5ca893c" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">The Earth's temperature has only risen by 1 DEGREE CELCIUS in the past 100 years according to the NOAA</a>, so the main argument against oil production in the U.S. is based on the fallacy that man-made carbon has any bearing whatsoever on climate changes. But maybe the carbon fraud is just a distraction from something else?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">To fix any supply and demand issues in the U.S., we only need to start producing once again at levels that were easily obtainable in 2020. But what if the issue of supply contraction is not the main cause of oil inflation? I would note that the dollar is not only the world reserve currency but also the global petro-currency. Until recently, almost all oil was traded internationally using dollars. The decline or collapse of the dollar's buying power due to money printing and runaway inflation is more likely the direct cause of rising oil prices, and supply issues are secondary.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">If the dollar was to collapse due to inflation, oil would be one of the first early indicators. With the establishment blocking new oil production and hindering the most cost-effective method for oil transport (pipelines), an engineered decline in supply becomes a very effective smokescreen for the death of the dollar. The crisis caused by the government and the Federal Reserve's currency destruction could then be blamed on supply chain issues and climate "peril." This is the reason why the establishment will not allow any future growth in U.S. oil production. They cannot allow the public to realize the precarious position our currency is in.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Debt and liquidity crisis? Let states establish their own banks and currencies</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The state of North Dakota has an interesting model for economic independence, which utilizes a state-sponsored bank designed specifically to help businesses in North Dakota. I would say it's bizarre that this idea has not become popular across the nation, but I understand that if it did, the federal government and the central bankers would be very unhappy.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Here's the thing, while it is true that the Constitution explicitly states that the U.S. Treasury becomes the only issuer of U.S. currency, this was done at a time when our currency was backed by gold and silver and there was no corrupt middleman in the form of a central bank. In truth, the Treasury is now second fiddle to the Federal Reserve, and the constitutional regulations on money have already been broken. It's time for a new currency model and banking model.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">An official bank in each state could decentralize power away from the Federal Reserve in terms of how debt and interest rates are handled, creating something closer to free-market discovery of interest rates rather than a rate dictatorship controlled by the Fed. By extension, each state could also issue currency scrip legal for use only within the borders of those states. This would create a secondary safety net against inflation in the dollar.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In other words, we decentralize the banking system, and we offer state alternatives that function not so much as competing currencies but as parallel or complementary currencies backed by and exchangeable in certain commodities. I believe very strongly that this model (along with a couple of dozen other measures I don't have space to cover here) could save our country from decades of economic mismanagement and bring us back from the brink of catastrophe.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">States could do this without the permission of the federal government or the Federal Reserve, but I have little doubt that the elites would be in an uproar. Make no mistake, states will have to move to decouple from the national financial system and build alternatives as soon as they realize that the dollar is tanking, and stagflation is here to stay. And when they do, the establishment will declare such actions on par with "insurrection."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In the meantime, there are numerous preparations, and each individual can make in their local communities to insulate themselves from economic dangers. There are those that will say that local measures are only a stopgap and more national action needs to be taken. They are partially correct; in the long run, there needs to be wider organization toward free markets once again, along with redundancies in state economies. In the short term, we must do what we can.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Ultimately, the clearest solutions to our fiscal fate are not pursued because the elites do not want to save the economy, at least not in a way that ends up with them having less power. They want even more power and centralization that extends beyond national boundaries into the realm of a single global currency and a single globally managed market. Fixing the system can't happen because they won't let it happen.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">This means that the only fix that truly matters will be the one that allows all other others to progress, and that fix is to remove these people from positions of influence and authority. You can't really repair the body in the wake of an illness until the offending disease is first eliminated.<br /><br />To truth and knowledge,<br /><br />Brandon Smith</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-41862736705890327202022-02-24T18:47:00.007-08:002022-02-24T18:48:16.812-08:00Order out of chaos: How the Ukraine conflict is designed to benefit globalists<p> By Brandon Smith from Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjeI-J55qg9gP8aBlyu6DSjz1el7BohGc0olg00v9THf8Inar-b19MTIfClQxDvkKii7Dbt7-nd3h6fTs9kjpRAOMdsfvDEsms1KPpRATMFwVIE1A6Snqc5ycB_p9TrLC7qMpuAjDOPrBXSRqSk5bPRPzz6-aB9OwQgOi7HsCBfSXsw2u7Iuw-m8g=s1314" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="532" data-original-width="1314" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjeI-J55qg9gP8aBlyu6DSjz1el7BohGc0olg00v9THf8Inar-b19MTIfClQxDvkKii7Dbt7-nd3h6fTs9kjpRAOMdsfvDEsms1KPpRATMFwVIE1A6Snqc5ycB_p9TrLC7qMpuAjDOPrBXSRqSk5bPRPzz6-aB9OwQgOi7HsCBfSXsw2u7Iuw-m8g=s16000" /></a></div><br /><p><span face="Verdana, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px;">There is now a direct military conflict in Ukraine, with Russia now openly supporting and recognizing separatist groups in the Donbass region on the eastern edge of the country and apparently positioning to aid them militarily in separation. This is not the first time Russia has sent military units into Ukraine, but it is the first time since 2014 and the annexation of Crimea that the threat of military action has been overt rather than covert.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">When a more major conflict erupts, you are going to see a swarm of media stories in western nations trying to outline the complexity of the relationship between Russia and Ukraine since the fall of the Soviet Union, while ignoring certain inconvenient truths. You will see many of these stories construct a narrative that then oversimplifies the situation and paints Russia as the monstrous aggressor. The goal will be to convince the public that our involvement in Ukraine is a moral and geopolitical necessity. There will be attempts to gain American favor and a call for U.S. military involvement. Joe Biden will be at the forefront of this push.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The surface trigger for the confrontation is obviously rooted in the 2009 decision by western powers and Ukrainian officials to consider the country for membership in NATO. Most of Russia's actions when dealing with Ukraine can be owed to NATO involvement in the region, including the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014. </p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Strategically, it makes sense. Imagine if Mexico suddenly announced it was joining a military alliance with China and that Chinese military assets were going to be transferred near the U.S. southern border? It probably would not end well.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">To be sure, Russia has a history of hypocritical behavior when it comes to its involvement in the affairs of its neighbors. For example, only a few months ago Kazakhstan was facing mass protests which the government claimed were caused by "foreign manipulation." Zero proof was presented to justify this assertion. However, the claim was enough to rationalize the deployment of 2300 Russian troops over the border to shut down the protests.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In reality, citizens of Kazakhstan were angry over a spike in inflation and high gas prices which continue to grind down the middle class and those in poverty. In 2019, only 4% of the population lived under the official poverty line. In 2020, that number exploded to 14% of the population. Accurate numbers are difficult to find for 2021, but it is likely that poverty levels are now closer to 16%-20%. The reasons for civil unrest were obvious and justified, but the Kazakhs were accused of being pawns of foreign enemies. As I have noted in many articles lately, this is a typical strategy of governments trying to retain power when the people rise up to rebel for legitimate reasons.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Again, imagine if the Canadian government under Trudeau asked for US military assistance in scattering the trucker protests against his draconian vaccine mandates? We need to look at these decisions in context in order to grasp how insane they really are.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Ironically, Russia is happy to support the unrest of separatists in Ukraine while helping to silence unrest in Kazakhstan. Keep this pattern in mind because it will help in understanding how events surrounding Russia reflect a global trend that might affect Americans in the future.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The diplomatic mess between Ukraine and Russia can be blamed in part on both sides, and it's this kind of historical ambiguity where globalists tend to thrive. The fog of war helps to obscure their activities and often it is hard for people to see who is truly benefiting from the chaos until it's too late. It is my belief that the Ukraine problem is at least partially engineered and that it is designed as a first domino in a chain of intended crises.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I don't think there is anything unique to the Ukraine conflict for the globalists; they could have just as easily tried to initiate a regional war in Taiwan, North Korea, Iran, etc. There are numerous powder keg countries that they have been cultivating for a couple of decades. We should not hyperfocus on who is to blame between Ukraine or Russia, but on the effects that will result from any major regional disaster and how the globalists exploit such catastrophes to further the agenda of total centralization of power.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The Ukraine scenario could be easily defused if both sides took some basic diplomatic measures, but this is not going to happen. NATO officials could take a step back from the pursuit of adding Ukraine to the ranks. The U.S. could stop pouring cash and weaponry into Ukraine to the tune of $5.4 billion since 2014. Over 90 tons of military equipment has been sent to the country in 2022 alone. Russia could stop sending covert special operations units into the Donbass and be more willing to come to the table to discuss diplomatic solutions. The reason these things do not happen is because they are not allowed to happen by the power brokers behind the curtain.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">We are all aware of the globalist influences behind US and NATO leaders, we present undeniable evidence of this on a regular basis. Biden's penchant for globalist institutions is well known. But what about Russia?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">There are some in the alternative media and the liberty movement who falsely believe that Russia is anti-globalist. Nothing could be further from the truth. As with many political leaders, Putin will sometimes use anti-globalist rhetoric, but his relationships tell another story. In Putin's first autobiography, titled First Person, <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/7693/242154/6aaee801d67f7a6420eafa6995807b6687ebaeb8/3a46f7667b7c8bb22d5964358294ae2bff2a98e6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">he discusses with fondness his first encounter with New World Order globalist Henry Kissinger</a> as a member of the FSB (formerly the KGB). As Putin rose through the political ranks, he maintained a steady friendship with Kissinger and to this day they have regular lunches and Kissinger has been an adviser to multiple branches of the Kremlin.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It doesn't stop there, though. Putin and the Kremlin have also kept a steady dialogue with the World Economic Forum, the project of the now notorious globalist Klaus Schwab. In fact, only last year <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/7693/242154/87f0a2d09b8ecaffd38ff8aa14ff88d010cd2c8d/3a46f7667b7c8bb22d5964358294ae2bff2a98e6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Russia announced it was joining the WEF's "Fourth Industrial Revolution Network"</a> which focuses on economic socialization, artificial intelligence, the "internet of things" and a host of other globalist interests which will all lead to worldwide technocracy and tyranny.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Again, the Russian government is not anti-globalist. This claim is nonsense and always has been. I would attribute the fantasy of Russian opposition to a steady stream of propaganda and what I call the False East/West Paradigm. The fraudulent notion that the globalist agenda is a purely Western or American agenda and that countries like China and Russia are opposed to it. If you look at the close interactions between the east and the globalists, this idea completely falls apart.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It's important to understand that most conflicts between the East and the West are engineered conflicts and the leaders of both sides are not really at odds with each other. Rather, these wars are Kabuki Theater; they are wars of convenience to achieve covert ends while mesmerizing the masses with moments of terror and calamity. For anyone who has doubts about this, I highly recommend they read the thoroughly researched and evidenced works of professional historian and economist <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/7693/242154/47c52931c2b80d82eb83e35b983fccbe053ef15e/3a46f7667b7c8bb22d5964358294ae2bff2a98e6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Antony Sutton</a>, who quite accidentally stumbled onto the facts surrounding the globalist conspiracy and went on to expose their habit of playing both sides of nearly every war over the past century from the <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/7693/242154/d1e79d4ca8fb8eebfb6185ab8cc9fcced94aa2ae/3a46f7667b7c8bb22d5964358294ae2bff2a98e6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">Bolshevik Revolution</a> to WWII and onward.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The strategy of order out of chaos is nothing new, it's something the globalists have been doing for a very long time. The number of open revelations post-COVID about the "Great Reset" that globalists have publicly admitted to is so staggering that their plans can no longer be denied. Anyone who does at this point should be suspected of having a single-digit IQ.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">So, now that we have established the reality of globalist involvement in both the West and in Russia, we need to ask ourselves how they benefit from initiating a crisis in Ukraine? What do they get out of it?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It appears to me that Ukraine is a Plan B attempt to conjure more smoke and mirrors where the COVID pandemic in many respects failed to satisfy the Great Reset plan. As Klaus Schwab and the WEF have constantly asserted, they saw the pandemic as the perfect "opportunity" to force the Fourth Industrial Revolution on the world. As globalist Rahm Emanual once opined in the wake of the 2008 economic crash:</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The <a href="https://mlink.news.boblivingstonletter.com/a/2240/click/7693/242154/ce1536bb07483cc0d6276883096ade27d28d55e9/3a46f7667b7c8bb22d5964358294ae2bff2a98e6" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">WEF</a> is an old hand at this tactic. Klaus Schwab also used the same exact language right after the credit crash of 2008 as he has used after the spread of COVID, always trying to sell global governance as the solution to every disaster:</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"What we are experiencing is the birth of a new era, a wake-up call to overhaul our institutions, our systems and, above all, our thinking, and to adjust our attitudes and values to the needs of a world which rightly expects a much higher degree of responsibility and accountability," he explained. "If we recognize this crisis as being really transformational, we can lay the fundaments for a more stable, more sustainable and even more prosperous world."</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">- Klaus Schwab on the Global Redesign Initiative, 2009</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Schwab jumped the gun back then just as he jumped the gun in 2020 when he declared the Great Reset an inevitability in the face of COVID. The globalists must have expected a much higher death rate from the virus because they were practically dancing in the streets, elated over the amount of power they could steal in the name of "protecting the public from a global health threat." If you look at the WEF and Gates Foundation simulation of a COVID pandemic, Event 201 which was held only two months before the real thing happened, they clearly expected COVID to do way more damage, predicting an initial death tally of 65 million. This never happened; it isn't even close.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">It's hard to say why an obvious bioweapon like COVID failed to do the job. Viruses tend to mutate rapidly in the wild and behave differently than they do in a lab setting. I would even consider the possibility of divine intervention. Whatever the reason, the globalists did not get what they wanted and now they need yet another crisis to oil the gears of the Reset machine. With the already tiny death rate of COVID now dropping even further with the Omicron variant and half the states of the U.S. in full defiance of the vax mandates it is only a matter of time before the rest of the world asks why they are still under medical authoritarianism?</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">War in Ukraine and the mere threat of that war expanding beyond the region could accomplish a number of things COVID has not. It provides an ongoing cover for the stagflationary collapse which is now in full swing in the U.S., the supply chain problems that continue globally, as well as the destabilization of the European economy. In particular, the EU is strongly reliant on Russian natural gas in order to heat homes and maintain its economy. Russia has strangled natural gas supplies to Europe in the past and they will do it again.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">War is always a distraction from economic sabotage. Even though the seeds of financial crashes are often planted and watered well in advance by central banks, the banks never get the blame because international conflicts take center stage. By extension, global economic crisis causes mass poverty, mass desperation and mass hysteria, and globalists will say that it requires an international solution that they will happily provide in the form of centralization.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In the U.S. and in many other western nations which have a large number of people still defending individual freedom, the globalists clearly want to use tensions with Russia as a means to silence public dissent over authoritarian policies. Already, I am seeing numerous instances of establishment officials and leftists on social media suggesting that liberty activists are "pawns of the Russians" and that we are being used to "divide and conquer." This is nonsense backed by nothing, but they are trying out the narrative anyway to see if it sticks.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">I have no doubt that any rebellion in the U.S. against the globalists will be blamed on foreign interference, exactly as Trudeau blamed the few US donations made to the Truckers' Freedom Convoy as "foreign" influence requiring Emergency powers. </p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">As mentioned earlier, the last thing the elites want is movements of free people obstructing the Reset in the name of liberty. We witnessed this in Canada where Trudeau announced unilateral emergency powers against the trucker protests, giving himself totalitarian levels of control. Even the Russian government has intervened in such public actions to prevent any kind of activist momentum. Biden will try to do the same thing, and war, even a smaller regional war, gives him a rationale to oppress public dissent in the name of public security.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Interesting, martial law in the U.S. is also much easier to legally and historically justify for the government as long as it is done in response to the invasion of a foreign enemy. The Russian influence narrative may very well be in preparation for martial law within America. Whether or not this actually succeeds is another matter.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The consequences of a shooting event in Ukraine would be far reaching well beyond a distraction for the American public; my intent here is not to suggest only Americans will be affected. My point is that there are certain places in the world that are naturally resistant to the globalist scheme, and freedom-minded Americans are a primary obstacle. If there is a large-scale rebellion against the Great Reset, it's going to start here. The globalists know this as well, which is why the U.S. will undoubtedly be centrally involved in the Ukraine quagmire. While the event would be disastrous for Ukrainians and probably many Russians, there are deeper and more dangerous underlying threats intended for the U.S.</p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">- Brandon Smith -</p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-77780187977880820342022-02-14T17:30:00.001-08:002022-02-14T17:30:20.048-08:00Crime Sinister’s update<p> </p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper" role="presentation" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; color: black; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; min-width: 100%; width: 100%px;"><tbody><tr><td class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper yiv6159472521camarker-inner" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; margin: 10px 0px 20px; padding: 0px;">Today, Justin Trudeau and the Liberal government provided an important update on the work being done to end the ongoing illegal blockades and occupations across the country – and the support that Canada is providing to Ukraine in the face of continued Russian aggression.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper" role="presentation" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; color: black; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; min-width: 100%; width: 100%px;"><tbody><tr><td class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper yiv6159472521camarker-inner" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><div align="center" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://click.action.liberal.ca/?qs=97c97c38951e607c7b8dfbff9f6531d31f1e7cffba0f17923c2487defb8fffcc74e9aa3a79e62cb2ab181c5677a9b128cc4e58a349936ff7" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank"><img align="center" alt="" border="0" src="https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.action.liberal.ca%2Flib%2Ffe95137275640d7971%2Fm%2F8%2Fde6d562a-0c76-4b9d-8030-95a6299aa7da.png&t=1644888495&ymreqid=06f818fb-05ce-3da9-1c39-13000001e500&sig=ateGJRU9ZU_WjmdsB26J4A--~D" style="border: none; display: block; margin: 0px auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-indent: -9999px; width: 543.516px;" width="500" /></a></div><br /></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper" role="presentation" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; color: black; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; min-width: 100%; width: 100%px;"><tbody><tr><td class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper yiv6159472521camarker-inner" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; margin: 10px 0px 20px; padding: 0px;">This important update can be watched <a href="https://click.action.liberal.ca/?qs=97c97c38951e607c7b8dfbff9f6531d31f1e7cffba0f17923c2487defb8fffcc74e9aa3a79e62cb2ab181c5677a9b128cc4e58a349936ff7" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="color: #196ad4;" target="_blank">here</a>, and his full remarks are below.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 28px; margin: 10px 0px 20px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"><u>Prime Minister's remarks regarding the Emergencies Act, blockades, and Ukraine</u></p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 28px; margin: 10px 0px 20px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Check against delivery</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper" role="presentation" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; color: black; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; min-width: 100%; width: 100%px;"><tbody><tr><td class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper yiv6159472521camarker-inner" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Je suis accompagné aujourd’hui de la vice-première ministre Freeland, et des ministres Mendicino, Blair, Lametti.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Je suis ici pour faire le point sur les barrages illégaux.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Je veux aussi parler de nos efforts pour soutenir l’Ukraine face à l’agression russe.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Commençons par la situation ici au Canada.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We’re entering the third week of illegal blockades that have been disrupting the lives of too many Canadians.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Here in our capital city, families and small businesses have been enduring illegal obstruction of their neighbourhoods.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Occupying streets, harassing people, breaking the law: this is not a peaceful protest.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">At the borders in different places in the country, the blockades are harming our economy and endangering public safety.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Critical supply chains have been disrupted.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">This is hurting workers who rely on these jobs to feed their families.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Yesterday, the Ambassador Bridge was reopened between Windsor and Detroit.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Our team and I have been working with Ontario and the city of Windsor around the clock.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Want to thank officers on the ground, including the RCMP, who played an active role.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We now have a responsibility to make sure the bridge remains open.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">With each illegal blockade, local law enforcement agencies have been acting to keep the peace within their jurisdiction.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Despite their best efforts, it is now clear that there are serious challenges to law enforcements’ ability to effectively enforce the law.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On Friday, Ontario invoked a state of emergency to respond to the blockades – this was the responsible and necessary thing to do.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Today, to continue building on these efforts, the federal government is ready to use more tools at its disposal to get the situation fully under control.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">After discussions with Cabinet and caucus.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">After consultation with premiers from all provinces and territories.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">And after speaking with opposition leaders.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The federal government invoked the Emergencies Act to supplement Provincial and Territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">I want to be very clear: the scope of these measures will be time-limited, geographically targeted, as well as reasonable and proportionate to the threats they are meant to address.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The Emergencies Act will be used to strengthen and support law enforcement agencies at all levels across the country.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people’s jobs and restoring confidence in our institutions.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Here’s how the measures we’re taking today will help get the situation under control.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The police will be given more tools to restore order in places where public assemblies constitute illegal and dangerous activities, such as blockades and occupations, as seen in Ottawa, the Ambassador Bridge, and elsewhere.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">These tools include strengthening their ability to impose fines or imprisonment.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The government will designate, secure and protect places and infrastructure that are critical to our economy and people’s jobs, including border crossings or airports.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We cannot and will not allow illegal and dangerous activities to continue.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The Emergencies Act will also allow the government to make sure essential services are rendered, for example, in order to tow vehicles blocking roads.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">In addition, financial institutions will be authorized or directed to render essential services to help address the situation, including by regulating and prohibiting the use of property to fund or support illegal blockades.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Finally, it will enable the RCMP to enforce municipal by-laws and provincial offences where required.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">That is what the Emergencies Act does.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Let me be equally clear about what it does not do.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We are not using the Emergencies Act to call in the military.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We are not suspending fundamental rights or overriding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We are not limiting people’s freedom of speech.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We are not limiting freedom of peaceful assembly.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We are not preventing people from exercising their right to protest legally.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We are reinforcing the principles, values, and institutions that keep all Canadians free.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Après des discussions avec le Conseil des ministres et le caucus.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Après avoir consulté les premiers ministres de toutes les provinces et tous les territoires.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Et après avoir parlé avec les chefs de l’opposition.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Le gouvernement fédéral invoque la Loi sur les mesures d’urgence pour compléter les pouvoirs provinciaux et territoriaux visant à gérer l’occupation et les barrages illégaux.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Je veux être très clair : ces mesures vont être limitées dans le temps et ciblées géographiquement.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Elles vont être raisonnables et proportionnelles aux menaces à la sécurité du Canada.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">La Loi sur les mesures d’urgence va renforcer et soutenir le travail des policiers.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On ne se sert pas de la Loi des mesures d’urgence pour déployer l’armée.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On ne suspend pas les droits fondamentaux prévus dans la Charte des droits et libertés.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On ne limite pas la liberté d’expression, ni le droit de manifester pacifiquement.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Ce qu’on veut, c’est d’assurer la sécurité des Canadiens, protéger les emplois des travailleurs et rétablir la confiance dans nos institutions.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The Emergencies Act is not something that’s been used ever, but it exists for a reason.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Invoking the Emergencies Act is never the first thing government should do, or even the second.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The Act is to be used sparingly, as a last resort.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Right now, the situation requires additional tools not held by any other federal, provincial or territorial law.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Today, in these circumstances, it is now clear that responsible leadership requires us to do this.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">These measures must be, and will be, compliant with our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Indeed, the Emergencies Act was created in the eighties to flow from, and uphold, the Charter.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We’ll always defend the rights of Canadians to peaceful assembly, and to freedom of expression.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">But these blockades are illegal, and if you’re still participating, it’s time to go home now.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On a separate track from the Emergencies Act, I want to reassure people that the Canadian Border Services Agency is already turning back non-Canadians trying to enter Canada to participate in blockades.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Of course, while we get the situation under control, we’ll continue to have Canadians’ backs.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">I want to remind affected businesses that, if you’re facing revenue losses, support is available through our wage and rent subsidy programs.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We know that downtown Ottawa businesses in particular have been hard hit by these illegal activities.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">In the coming days, we’ll be launching specific support for these businesses.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">I know that everyone is tired of the pandemic.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We’re hearing your frustration with COVID, and with the temporary measures we had to put forward to keep people safe.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">I know people are frustrated, I hear it.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">You have the right to express that frustration, and even your anger with the government.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">It’s something we’ll always defend in this free and democratic country.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">But blockading streets and critical infrastructures, and depriving your neighbours of their freedoms is a totally different thing.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">It has to stop.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Tout le monde est fatigué de la pandémie.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Il y a d’autres façons de vous exprimer que de participer à des activités illégales et dangereuses.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Comme le ministre Duclos l’a dit la semaine passée : les mesures de santé publique sont constamment réévaluées et on va continuer de les modifier en fonction de la science. On va justement avoir quelques annonces à faire à ce sujet dans les prochains jours.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Today, I also want to talk about our support for Ukraine.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On Saturday, I spoke with President Zelenskyy to reaffirm Canada’s steadfast support and to continue whatever we can to assist Ukraine.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Durant la fin de semaine, j’ai aussi eu des appels avec le président du Conseil européen, Charles Michel, avec le chancelier Scholz de l’Allemagne, et avec le président Duda de la Pologne.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">As part of the collective G7 response to support Ukraine’s economic resilience, today we’re announcing that Canada will offer a loan of up to $500 million to the Government of Ukraine.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">I want to thank Deputy Prime Minister Freeland for her leadership on this file.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">This is in addition to the $120 million loan offered earlier in January.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">On top of financial support, Canada has already taken steps to help Ukraine defend itself, including with the extension of the training mission, Operation UNIFIER.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">In light of the seriousness of the situation and following conversations with our Ukrainian partners, I’ve approved the provision of $7.8 million worth of lethal equipment and ammunition.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">This responds to Ukraine’s specific request and is in addition to the non-lethal equipment we’ve already provided.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">The intent of this support, from Canada and other partners, is to deter further Russian aggression.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">En raison du sérieux de la situation et après avoir soigneusement examiné la question, j’ai approuvé la demande de l’Ukraine de leur envoyer de l’armement et des munitions.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Le Canada se joint donc aux États-Unis, au Royaume-Uni, à la Bulgarie, la République tchèque, l’Estonie, la Lettonie, la Lituanie, aux Pays-Bas et à la Pologne dans l’envoi d’armement.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Le but de ce soutien de la part du Canada et de nos autres partenaires est de dissuader la Russie de poursuivre son agression contre l’Ukraine.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">We’re not seeking confrontation with Russia.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">But the situation is intensifying rapidly and we’re showing our resolve.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">It’s important for Canadians and the world to know that Canada will continue supporting Ukraine and its independence, integrity, and sovereignty, including its right to defend itself.</p><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28px; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px;">Merci.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper" role="presentation" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; color: black; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, "Lucida Grande", sans-serif; font-size: 13px; min-width: 100%; width: 100%px;"><tbody><tr><td class="yiv6159472521stylingblock-content-wrapper yiv6159472521camarker-inner" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><table align="left" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; margin: 0px; width: 679.406px;"><tbody><tr><td style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 15px 15px 15px 0px; word-break: normal;" width="75"><img alt="Liberal Party of Canada" border="0" height="75" src="https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.action.liberal.ca%2Flib%2Ffe95137275640d7971%2Fm%2F4%2Fa6b4132f-5b1e-44c1-9993-4dd98886d92d.png&t=1644888495&ymreqid=06f818fb-05ce-3da9-1c39-13000001e500&sig=ij.oz0W8PED4mXEeHbLPgw--~D" style="border: none; display: block; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-indent: -9999px;" width="75" /></td><td style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px;" width=""><tbody><tr></tr><tr><td align="left" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; word-break: normal;"><p align="left" class="yiv6159472521lettercopy" style="color: #3d4f5d; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Liberal Party of Canada</p></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-288937470212423297.post-3852008520415803742022-02-14T15:27:00.003-08:002022-02-14T15:27:16.838-08:0050 Years Later - The True Story Behind the October Crisis of 1970 Must Be Told<p>From here:</p><p>https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/02/11/the-true-story-behind-the-october-crisis-of-1970-must-be-told/</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">50 Years Later: The True Story Behind the October Crisis of 1970 Must Be Told</span></b></p><p>by MATTEHRET POSTED ON FEBRUARY 11, 2022</p><p>On June 15, 2019 the strange fact was made public by Canada’s National Post that the entire 40 year CSIS dossier compiled on Canada’s most famous Prime Minister, Pierre Elliot Trudeau was destroyed by Canada’s spy agency in 1989: <a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/csis-destroyed-secret-file-on-pierre-trudeau-stunning-historians?r">https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/csis-destroyed-secret-file-on-pierre-trudeau-stunning-historians?r</a></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEioVdQVbL8TtsSowVt6mQ5eWt0xk7xX_MfxCQCYZUCc7E8u_FWcYfeCJLSxUQFLwJJJKcwZc0C44LZYJh-fIKxZaO0LrQcDrUcqA99Xfe9uqpjuCtGnndjAOP-IuFFI4JUTe2fWB4D-yUP6j2M0j72yW_04xkc14LIv7kxQ64CnuHakFO1oKHpCbg=s466" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="381" data-original-width="466" height="524" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEioVdQVbL8TtsSowVt6mQ5eWt0xk7xX_MfxCQCYZUCc7E8u_FWcYfeCJLSxUQFLwJJJKcwZc0C44LZYJh-fIKxZaO0LrQcDrUcqA99Xfe9uqpjuCtGnndjAOP-IuFFI4JUTe2fWB4D-yUP6j2M0j72yW_04xkc14LIv7kxQ64CnuHakFO1oKHpCbg=w640-h524" width="640" /></a></div><p>How this embarrassing fact could have gone un-noticed for so long is tied to access to information laws in Canada which make all government dossiers available on any public or private citizen 20 years after their deaths. With the 20 year anniversary of Pierre Trudeau’s death just around the corner, and the 50th anniversary of the October Crisis, hungry historians searching for a story filed early applications to read this long awaited dossier which was supposed to be awaiting scrutinizing eyes in the Archives of Canada. The answer they received from CSIS and the National Archives was that the massive treasure of documentation was destroyed because it did not “meet the threshold set out by the CSIS Act to justify being kept in service’s active inventory. The file also fell short of criteria for preservation set out by the national archives”.</p><p>Many are now wondering if the secrets CSIS wished to remain hidden are tied to its own subversive behaviour, or if it relates to potentially embarrassing information on the role played by Canada’s third longest standing Prime Minister within the context of Britain’s geopolitical “Great Game” against the world.</p><p>As we will briefly review here, by looking at the global transformation underway during Pierre Trudeau’s reign, and the specific “inside job” played by Trudeau and Anglo-Canadian Intelligence agencies during the “October Crisis” in 1970, we will discover that both answers are likely close to the truth.</p><p>This exercise is especially important at this time of crisis, as developments in Ottawa and Canada are pointing to new dangers of a repeat of a tyrannical crackdown on peaceful protestors demanding the return of their freedoms.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">Sovereignty or Technocracy: A Tale of Two Revolutions</span></b></p><p>Until 1947, Canada was known as “The Dominion of Canada”. While its title of “Dominion” has changed, Canada is still not an independent nation, but a Monarchy ruled by the British Queen and Privy Council. Until the 1960s, the French Canadians, who form the overwhelming majority of the population of Quebec, were in the main confined to manual labour and low-level clerical jobs, while the upper echelons of society were occupied by the descendants of the British colonial elite. The question for honest leaders in Quebec at that time was “How can a society so long kept economically and culturally underdeveloped be brought into a state of self-government, skills and dignity”?</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjODL6lqjCUe9L3mrVOcCz7bmeYFLxMcRDTB4Pf-sX8zP-B3LSlIVdHGx0WTnO8wVJy79wskqvl1fQ0i1b62yy09vKNu2VVL3r6829wQwikQIolKZv-toyXFYt523ybdnObRkc_Ith2AfVMPHtj9aLPx21GRN9nKTvOflpRJqxqoJ6g6PGUUXbYbQ=s300" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="229" data-original-width="300" height="488" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjODL6lqjCUe9L3mrVOcCz7bmeYFLxMcRDTB4Pf-sX8zP-B3LSlIVdHGx0WTnO8wVJy79wskqvl1fQ0i1b62yy09vKNu2VVL3r6829wQwikQIolKZv-toyXFYt523ybdnObRkc_Ith2AfVMPHtj9aLPx21GRN9nKTvOflpRJqxqoJ6g6PGUUXbYbQ=w640-h488" width="640" /></a></div><p>October Crisis - Faced with that conundrum, Quebec Premiers Paul Sauvé (1959), Jean Lesage (Liberal Party 1960-65) and Daniel Johnson Sr. (Union nationale 1966-68) had, between 1959 and 1968, instituted policies that had led to a great economic revolution in Quebec centered on scientific and technological progress. This was done by the creation of an advanced engineering culture of Quebec and an international outlook towards ending colonialism under French President Charles de Gaulle’s leadership.</p><p>This was, however only one current that shaped the 1959-68 period of Quebec. There was a second, much more evil current that also shaped that period. WIthout an understanding of both currents, then no comprehension of the true purpose of the October crisis of 1970 and its effects were at all possible.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">The Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Society</span></b></p><p>October Crisis - The De Gaulle-Johnson-Lesage nation-building momentum had been an inspired attempt to outflank the British Malthusian movement that was then attempting to impose the program which Fabian Society leader H.G. Wells described in detail in his 1930 book the “New World Order” of depopulation, eugenics, and one world government. In his book, H.G. Wells states:</p><p>“It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go… We are living in the end of the sovereign states… In the great struggle to evoke a westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish….Countless people…will hate the new world order….and will die protesting against it.”</p><p>Later on, in 1932, Wells, ever the devout eugenicist stated that all progressives and social reformers must become “liberal fascisti… enlightened nazis.”</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgFs6a3BTDNHlhnVpu5qsXa7P5MBiR6YxYlvU-w_V7VqEzDj8MTrewsi_V7LwUoTydLWUqvJk6GEWMM8xcDzmIMkGWeOVOXt25AmHSh_hNMrSb_sGGYReMw_jIZQ0lb9BeoA1sLdh0Ee06kDjUku-vQoJUKDXc4hKvilCZNMYgsW515Ow__mlVvgQ=s300" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="300" data-original-width="166" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgFs6a3BTDNHlhnVpu5qsXa7P5MBiR6YxYlvU-w_V7VqEzDj8MTrewsi_V7LwUoTydLWUqvJk6GEWMM8xcDzmIMkGWeOVOXt25AmHSh_hNMrSb_sGGYReMw_jIZQ0lb9BeoA1sLdh0Ee06kDjUku-vQoJUKDXc4hKvilCZNMYgsW515Ow__mlVvgQ=w354-h640" width="354" /></a></div><p>The strategy of the synarchist figures who ran both the October Crisis and the secularization of Quebec was to bring society under a system of perfect predictability and control outlined by Wells and other Fabian socialists decades earlier. For this deconstruction of pre-existing values to occur, Wells and other Fabian thinkers reasoned that society would have to be purged of its traditional Judeo-Christian values, love for the general welfare, and especially scientific and technological progress. In this sense, all forms of individualism that Wells refers to, which are in harmony with patriotic nationalism are simply causes of uncertainty and uncontrollable change in the mind of a social engineer and hence must be purged. Only a materialist society motivated by selfish impulses under a system of fixed resources can Georges be controlled in a predetermined fashion. The outcome of this social purging came later to be known as the “rock-drug-sex baby boomer counterculture”. Quebec, during this period was a battleground for the soul of western civilization.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjnSzmstxxy9xUYNKrS35_CVt5rPIZVMGx8kDrYN1cNP9LsJHaAbBJWFGUm0dOAyxvVDbBjnBJFxeHLx5QUZ1ebI1c8FdJgG-WwbObZu4DRfMQRH4ituVEwsLQbPPKbjr92fARx5RmExnnEnKl_-n3_cK0i1z880JOmpZXJLDLSNWLiNy_KB-ZQ-A=s300" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="300" data-original-width="142" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjnSzmstxxy9xUYNKrS35_CVt5rPIZVMGx8kDrYN1cNP9LsJHaAbBJWFGUm0dOAyxvVDbBjnBJFxeHLx5QUZ1ebI1c8FdJgG-WwbObZu4DRfMQRH4ituVEwsLQbPPKbjr92fARx5RmExnnEnKl_-n3_cK0i1z880JOmpZXJLDLSNWLiNy_KB-ZQ-A=w302-h640" width="302" /></a></div><p>Using the hypocrisies and corruption in the old Duplessis order as a moral lever to direct social anger towards the existing established order, the social engineering program that had been gaining steam from 1946-1960 under the control of Georges-Henri Levesque at the Université Laval, blew up with what had later come to be dubbed the `Quiet Revolution`.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjXjF286Xab6e8ymPDGfedGD0D_3Rx34TR3cy_4K8lzkfTzJwwGSLRS3fz4XNe_zOS5qBMQclLBr-RxhxugI9Sl9cYY6vDVhnPEnQd7em66JzzGDOj91X-bCQZXZ15_ctXLJvEkAtcke-0MIc6PasDi3fiE2gTLJUDJShAqAx4kvwRNSKBXxe9K6A=s150" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="150" data-original-width="150" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjXjF286Xab6e8ymPDGfedGD0D_3Rx34TR3cy_4K8lzkfTzJwwGSLRS3fz4XNe_zOS5qBMQclLBr-RxhxugI9Sl9cYY6vDVhnPEnQd7em66JzzGDOj91X-bCQZXZ15_ctXLJvEkAtcke-0MIc6PasDi3fiE2gTLJUDJShAqAx4kvwRNSKBXxe9K6A=w640-h640" width="640" /></a></div><p>October Crisis - While the nation-builders attempted to guide this transformation into a constructive direction, terrorist separatist groups such as the FLQ were created throughout the 1960s leading to the implementation of the War Measures Act on October 16th 1970, and then to the Emergency Measures Act under the leadership of Fabian Socialist Pierre Elliot Trudeau (Trudeau had been recruited to the Fabian Society under his tutelage of Fabian Leader (((Harold Laski))) at the London School of Economics from 1947-49 before being set up in the Ottawa Privy Council Office which has been a control center of Canada since Confederation). The latter act, somewhat less drastic than the War Measures Act, was voted up by the Canadian Parliament on December 1st 1970, and remained in force for five months.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">Introducing Pierre Vallières</span></b></p><p>October Crisis - Many of the resources utilized in the following report are derived from a book written by a journalist called Pierre Vallières, L’exécution de Pierre Laporte, les dessous de operation Essai (Editions Quebec-Amériques, 1977). Beyond what he writes in this book, Pierre Vallières himself is an important clue in the true story behind the true top down agenda of the Synarchy which organized the various intelligence organizations that effectively ran the October crisis.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjZss6PwOUECtx7e5n3yl4oVuZXrvCmH4pUhAzIG2YsK7h27ld3oeKt_bI-PS8XTqHSj-hguFEm2ytYeChA76yAoBAOhGZNB6GYwewqMVJTou2X4_aLKDAw5C17eRHpHsOI4c8QuGMJQiDGKBx-MuAOGPSCiqwq2Bc2W5KiP8f_vGMDp6zf5A4tQQ=s291" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="291" data-original-width="209" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjZss6PwOUECtx7e5n3yl4oVuZXrvCmH4pUhAzIG2YsK7h27ld3oeKt_bI-PS8XTqHSj-hguFEm2ytYeChA76yAoBAOhGZNB6GYwewqMVJTou2X4_aLKDAw5C17eRHpHsOI4c8QuGMJQiDGKBx-MuAOGPSCiqwq2Bc2W5KiP8f_vGMDp6zf5A4tQQ=w460-h640" width="460" /></a></div><p>Vallières was a major player in the events of October 1970. He came from the separatist left wing, and was a leading member of the Front de Libération du Quebec (FLQ), the movement that was held responsible for the bomb attacks, and the kidnapping of British diplomat James Cross, and Quebec’s Deputy Premier, Pierre Laporte. Vallières’ connection to the FLQ and his first hand account of the events surrounding the October Crisis are only truly useful if we take into account what he leaves out. By intentionally omitting a series of important facts, Vallières deflects the reader of his book from acquiring a sense of causality in the same way that September 11 “Inside job” reports may seem impressive in their knowledge of the mechanics of controlled demolitions, yet always leave out the role of the Saudi and British governments (through BAE Systems) in sponsoring the operation.</p><p>It is for that reason that it is vital to take into consideration the higher dynamics that Vallieres omits before plunging into the important mechanics which Vallière’s work accurately portrays regarding the fallacy behind the official narrative surrounding the FLQ and the October Crisis. Thus, before proceeding, we must first look at a relationship between Pierre Vallières and a magazine called Cité Libre.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">The Cité Libre-Vallières-Trudeau Connection</span></b></p><p>Cité Libre was an influential journal foundedby none other than Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Gérard Pelletier while both young men were employed in the Ottawa Privy Council Office in 1951. Cité Libre served as an important organizing tool used to attract young leftist élites of Quebec around an existentialist “personalist” ideology [1] and plan for overthrowing the catholic regime of Maurice Duplessis and the Vatican influenced Union National party that ran Quebec from 1945-1960. In fact, Vallières even received the reins of Cité Libre directly from Trudeau in 1965 taking over Trudeau’s job as Editor-in-Chief and thus freeing Trudeau up to become a federal Member of Parliament under the newly re-organized Liberal Party banner. The Federal Liberal Party had, by that time, been purged of all C.D. Howe influences, and had become the chosen host which leading Fabians and Rhodes scholars chose to take over to advance their agenda. The Liberal Party was chosen due to the simple fact that the Fabian Society of Canada (New Democratic Party) demonstrated itself incapable of gaining the necessary political power [2].</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhFQ3D72VMGQsl1fZOvRSm-anUKUmOu_3GrnhcXerxpnFFptWeKFH-q_hTWmMO-s29IgVNRgm8TwPoZVVkKQNc6EBRRf2pPXUjzLsnZqTKJNnKpPen9sisexv3bmdgA2EP3ovn4XB7mlrd_yDqlRK5TZe-hQ8hWygLsuTdaFrUSvbF0V_GM2_1PbQ=s750" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="420" data-original-width="750" height="358" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhFQ3D72VMGQsl1fZOvRSm-anUKUmOu_3GrnhcXerxpnFFptWeKFH-q_hTWmMO-s29IgVNRgm8TwPoZVVkKQNc6EBRRf2pPXUjzLsnZqTKJNnKpPen9sisexv3bmdgA2EP3ovn4XB7mlrd_yDqlRK5TZe-hQ8hWygLsuTdaFrUSvbF0V_GM2_1PbQ=w640-h358" width="640" /></a></div><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;">Within merely five years of this transfer of editorship of Cité Libre, Vallières was credited for leading Quebec into a state of crisis, while Trudeau (by now Prime Minister) used the chaos of Vallière’s organization as an excuse to implement the greatest psychological trauma on the Quebec population in history by declaring Marshall Law. This act also served to break the will of may Gaullist forces who were still resisting the technocratic Fabian reforms as late as 1970.</span></p><p>Several other Cité Libre operatives who rose to prominence in Quebec or Federal politics leading up to or after the October crisis include René Levésques, founder of the Parti Quebecois, Gérard Pelletier, Jean-Louis Gagnon, Marc Lalonde, Jean Marchand and Jean-Pierre Goyer.</p><p>Jean-Pierre Goyer was a frequent contributor to Cité Libre becoming an MP alongside Trudeau, Marchand and Pelletier in 1965, and then becoming appointed Solicitor General by Trudeau, overseeing the entire RCMP during the October Crisis. When the RCMP became too scandal ridden to be of any use, having been caught creating FLQ cells, robbing dynamite, conducting extortion and theft throughout the 1970s, Goyer played an instrumental role in creating CSIS alongside Trudeau`s right hand man and Privy Council Clerk Michael Pitfield in 1984. Pitfield himself had been active with the Cite Libre nest in the early 1960s translating the group’s influential “Manifesto pour une politique fonctionelle” of April 1964.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEig-8j4e8qto6z_crHo_GK5cSsM15PrrAw2x92R3ifqb4wHIw2kUEcw2Set1_S-zEY80V0ccQlFnnrDJiHVzVtcQ-f2zCEAWq8tkImlBfSo4oyGf6fsocaDJYrDdy0dblmuvvM3hiPgERkYO7aaSeuJWGbH5KvxfLczuYtQwD-sfHbpXk2nZuIl2Q=s487" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="379" data-original-width="487" height="498" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEig-8j4e8qto6z_crHo_GK5cSsM15PrrAw2x92R3ifqb4wHIw2kUEcw2Set1_S-zEY80V0ccQlFnnrDJiHVzVtcQ-f2zCEAWq8tkImlBfSo4oyGf6fsocaDJYrDdy0dblmuvvM3hiPgERkYO7aaSeuJWGbH5KvxfLczuYtQwD-sfHbpXk2nZuIl2Q=w640-h498" width="640" /></a></div><p style="text-align: center;"><br /></p><p>Jean-Louis Gagnon not only served as Managing editor of La Presse (alongside Gérald Pelletier), but Deputy Cabinet Minister and then head of Information Canada under Trudeau during the period of the October Crisis, while Gérard Pelletier was appointed Pierre Trudeau`s Secretary of State. The Oxford trained Marc Lalonde became Principle Secretary to Trudeau (and later his Justice Minister), Jean Marchand (who was dubbed by the Quebec press as one of the “Three Doves” (Pelletier and Trudeau being the other two) also became a Cabinet minister during this period. The vast majority of Cité Libre figures who rose to prominence were members of the Fabian Society’s Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (renamed NDP in 1960) before joining the Liberals.</p><p>This is the same group that brought in a cybernetics overhaul to the Canadian government [3] as well as the Malthusian Canadian branch of the Club of Rome, whose Privy Council sponsorship under Trudeau, Pitfield and Lalonde directed government funds to the study which later came to be called Limits to Growth (1972). It was this fraudulent work that became the gospel of the neo-Malthusian revival and was used to justify the “post industrial paradigm of depopulation, and empire.</p><p>As you will come to realize in due course by the mere presentation of the elementary facts regarding the October Crisis of 1970, everything you have ever been told about the FLQ and the greater October Crisis which resulted from their activities is a lie.</p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Endnotes</span></p><p>[1] The personalist ideology which formed the basis of Cité Libre was built around the thinking of Jacques Maritaine and Jean Mounier. Maritain and Mounier were part of the “Catholic” variety of the discrete collaborators with Vichy during WWII, after the integrist Pope, Pius XII, had signed a Concordat deal with Hitler. Maritain was an Ultramontane integrist type of fascist who revived Thomas Aquinas with the purpose of instituting a “New Middle Ages” with the collaboration of the Dominicans. </p><p>Maritain and Mounier were the leaders of the very Catholic “Ordre Nouveau” under Vichy. (See Pierre Beaudry’s Synarchy report on the DOMINICAN FASCIST YOUTH MOVEMENT in Book II: The Modern Synarchy </p><p>Movement of Empire </p><p>www.amatterofmind.org/Pierres_PDFs/SYNARCHY_I/BOOK_II/2._SYNARCHY_MOVEMENT_OF_EMPIRE_BOOK_II.pdf.) </p><p>Maritain was the most important French philosopher of the war years in France and later in America. </p><p>The entire Maritain, Mounier, and Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange salon at Meudon was anti- De Gaulle, during and after the war. They were “Catholic personalist communitarians” who oriented against individualism and materialism for the benefit of the Revolution Nationale of Petain.</p><p>[2] Before 1960, the New Democratic Party was known since its 1933 creation as the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF). The CCF was created as the political party of the League of Social Reconstruction, founded in 1932 by six Oxford Rhodes Scholars (F.R. Scott, Eugene Forsey, King Gordon, Escott Reid, David Lewis and Graham Spry), and two Fabians (Frank Underhill and Leonard Marsh). The purpose of the LSR and its spawn CCF was to implement a scientific dictatorship under the model set forth by H.G. Wells as a “solution” to the great depression of 1928-1933. It is thus not a coincidence the first CCF leader J.S. Woodsworth was a leading advocate of eugenics. F.R. Scott ecame a leading recruiter and lifelong controller of Trudeau upon the laters’ return to Canada in 1950. The LSR, CCF leadership worked closely with the Canadian Institute for International Affairs and founded the Canadian Forum.</p><p>[3] Speaking of his love for Cybernetics and systems analysis at a Harrison, Ontario Liberal Conference on November 21, 1969, Trudeau said:</p><p>“We are aware that the many techniques of cybernetics, by transforming the control function and the manipulation of information, will transform our whole society. With this knowledge, we are wide awake, alert, capable of action; no longer are we blind, inert powers of fate.”</p><p>It was Trudeau, Pitfield, Lalonde, Maurice Lamontagne and Rhodes Scholar Governor General Roland Michener, along with a batch of Malthusians from the Privy Council Office who founded the Club of Rome Canada in 1970 which established the zero growth depopulation agenda which would be pursued for the next 40 years by the oligarchy.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">The October Crisis of 1970: A Carefully-Prepared Plot</span></b></p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">By Benoit Chalifoux and Matthew Ehret-Kump</span></b></p><p>The list of structures and institutions that follows shows clearly that some in official circles had anticipated the October 1970 crisis, which crisis had been concocted to lead into the War Measures Act and a consolidation of power in the hands of the “new technocratic elite” that had taken control of the Quiet Revolution after the death of Quebec Premier Daniel Johnson in 1968 and the ouster of both Jean Lesage and Charles de Gaulle from political power in 1969.</p><p>The purpose of the following report, which relies heavily upon accounts by Pierre Vallières, taken from his 1977 book L’exécution de Pierre Laporte, les dessous de operation Essai (Editions Quebec-Amériques, 1977) , is not to establish the cause of the October Crisis, but to sufficiently demonstrate that the official narrative commonly used to explain this period is not true. Not only that, but as the facts will show, the cause of these terrible events were organized by more powerful institutions both within and above the Canadian government.</p><p><span style="font-size: large;">At the Federal Level (Ottawa)</span></p><p>Based at Ottawa, the Strategic Operations Centre (SOC), was the channel from the army to the Trudeau Government. Its existence became publicly known only in 1975, like that of the Centre national de planification des mesures d’urgences (C.N.P.M.U.), that worked closely alongside the SOC. In the light of what we now know, one can well imagine that the tasks of those centres was to draft, and implement, scenarios that could lead to promulgating the War Measures Act.</p><p>Establishment of the Comité du 7 May 1970: set up by the Federal Government in the wake of the elections on April 29th 1970, as we shall shortly see. The decision was disclosed only on December 23rd 1971, by the Toronto daily The Globe and Mail.</p><p><span style="font-size: large;">In Quebec</span></p><p>Opération Essai (Operation Trial), derived from an initial plan, first drafted in 1960, by the Planning and Operations Section of the Quebec Command. That same year, 1960, Jean Lesage became head of the Quebec Government, and launched the «Quiet Revolution» which was a process that had a bipolar character. This process became a key battle ground between two opposing forces. The first had aimed at installing a technocratic elite in Quebec while secularizing the province in preparation for a new Malthusian culture that could be reconstructed to the will of the oligarchy. The opposing force was represented by those nation-building, largely Catholic forces then centered around Lesage and Daniel Johnson who desired to direct the revolutionary energy then embracing Quebec around an anti-imperial strategy of republicanism and technological progress.</p><p>1966: the Infantry, Air Force and Navy were regrouped, and a new Mobile Army Command was set up at the Federal Military Base of Saint-Hubert.</p><p>1969: the Mobile Army Command set up its Civil Emergencies Section, whereby contacts with the army were to be restricted to carefully selected political figures.</p><p>7 June 1970: Michel Côté, the City of Montreal’s Head of Litigation, was secretly appointed to head the Combined Anti-terror Team – Escouade combinée anti-terroriste or C.A.T.. His job was to keep an eye on Jean Drapeau, then Mayor of Montreal.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;"> Chronology of the October 1970 crisis</span></b></p><p>The chronology below challenges the official thesis, and points up a great many contradictions.</p><p>1966: Daniel Johnson is elected Quebec Premier giving the anti-Malthusian catholic forces a new opening to regain their lost power on the continent. This coincides with the rise of Robert F. Kennedy to greater prominence in preparation for his 1968 announcement of his plans to revive his brother`s policies in his bid for the Presidency.</p><p>1967: Charles de Gaulle visits Quebec on Johnson’s invitation at which point deals are struck between the two leaders based on advanced technology, infrastructure, space technology and cultural programs. Many components of this arrangement were based upon the French-Quebec assistance of technology and training to former African colonies now gaining their independence. The French President was invited to return at the end 1968 for the Francophone Summit.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgDDzrKyARUf5uyb1yO3n3zaDak9_v7KqC8b25xS3Rv5iOlOVZSevxeDj7vIHwv9z4tbPPhw9kq-yMhOpZUghXLDOjQXt-phQhjSOVv36C7eh9f3-UOhlUFgmi77I0RnqUFoRWCLvAJjQG_bdgrnXNEH6dbODEBix3J5l27kcUBMlnG-EFYRBy5bg=s499" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="309" data-original-width="499" height="396" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgDDzrKyARUf5uyb1yO3n3zaDak9_v7KqC8b25xS3Rv5iOlOVZSevxeDj7vIHwv9z4tbPPhw9kq-yMhOpZUghXLDOjQXt-phQhjSOVv36C7eh9f3-UOhlUFgmi77I0RnqUFoRWCLvAJjQG_bdgrnXNEH6dbODEBix3J5l27kcUBMlnG-EFYRBy5bg=w640-h396" width="640" /></a></div><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;">26th September 1968: Daniel Johnson dies under unusual circumstances mere hours before the unveiling ceremony of the Manicouagan-5 Dam that Johnson had put into motion a decade earlier alongside then Premier and nation builder Paul Sauvé. Officially, he suffered a fatal heart attack. By 1969, De Gaulle is forced out of office in an anarchistic mock referendum in France. De Gaulle himself had survived over 13 assassination attempts run largely by the Montreal-based Permindex which was also at the center of the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963. Two of the three previous Union National Premiers before Johnson met identical fates and died of heart attacks while in office in a period of 6 months. Maurice Duplessis died on September 7, 1959, while Paul Sauvé died on January 2, 1960.</span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEh-f4n1TltWke-Samo0tdFey0Agz7aA_PMAUf-Vg-GUEnjPbOPYzGtQH1vUuZSwZnG0L6bx2sPQj6a5KTIkBBrUsxOsjG9MUCBtfzVFgHRDxH6NBQHt0w5eBXGKXn6cNdJ2cV8NEkxM2gYgypMsrJ_X76D1k2TRsTb7dlEobzvgMOw_m1t8eHcLng=s499" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="413" data-original-width="499" height="530" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEh-f4n1TltWke-Samo0tdFey0Agz7aA_PMAUf-Vg-GUEnjPbOPYzGtQH1vUuZSwZnG0L6bx2sPQj6a5KTIkBBrUsxOsjG9MUCBtfzVFgHRDxH6NBQHt0w5eBXGKXn6cNdJ2cV8NEkxM2gYgypMsrJ_X76D1k2TRsTb7dlEobzvgMOw_m1t8eHcLng=w640-h530" width="640" /></a></div><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;">1968: Daniel Johnson’s two greatest enemies: Pierre Trudeau and Rene Lévesques, both agents of the of the technocratic reforms of the Quiet Revolution steered by Georges Henri Lévesque’s Université Laval are set up to polarize Canada between two false notions of nationalism and install a new form of Malthusian power structure on both provincial and federal levels. Trudeau is set up as Prime Minister and Lévesques founds the Parti Quebecois (two weeks after Johnson’s death), later to emerge as Premier of Quebec (1976-85). The PQ absorbs many of the saner independence forces who advocated Johnson’s formulation of “Independence if necessary, but not necessarily independence”.</span></p><p>1968-1970: violent demonstrations break out in Montreal.</p><p>The Civil Emergencies Section predicts « grave disturbances » during the April elections, and states that the army might have to be called out to « protect the democratic vote ».</p><p>April 29th 1970: Provincial elections held whereby the separatists win 23% of the vote.</p><p>February and June 1970: two kidnapping plots are uncovered by the Montreal police force (police de la Communauté urbaine de Montreal, CUM). One plot, to be launched in June 1970, was to be an FLQ attack on the US Consulate, launched by FLQers Lanctôt and Marcil.</p><p>27 May 1970: an article in La Presse appears, on the army’s rôle in putting down civil disturbances in Canada. According to the article, military operations were be run out of the Saint-Hubert base.</p><p>In Pierre Vallières’ view « by late summer 1970, everything was in place, and liaison between the army and the police forces concerned had moved onto a weekly, sometimes daily basis ». He adds that « by June, the contents of the October manifesto had already been printed in some newspapers, following the abortive ‘Lanctôt-Marcil’ plot against the US Consulate; the FLQers demands had become known, and, finally, the FLQ’s operational bases (save for the flat rented in September in Northern Montreal by Cossette-Trudel) had been dismantled or had become known to the police. The FLQ-1970 was under control in October, and no surprise was possible ».</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">James Cross is kidnapped</span></b></p><p>5th October 1970: the British diplomat James Cross is kidnapped. The police’s first step is to go straight to the Greek Consul’s place of residence! The kidnappers’ trace is lost. The kidnappers demand that the FLQ’s manifesto be published, and that their political prisoners be freed.</p><p>7th October: one o’clock in the afternoon. Mrs. Cross is shown police photographs and identifies Jacques Lanctôt as one of the kidnappers.</p><p>8th October: the FLQ manifesto is published, but negotiations continue over the freeing of political prisoners.</p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">Pierre Laporte is kidnapped: the crisis intensifies</span></b></p><p>10th October (five forty in the afternoon): the Quebec Justice Minister announces that the authorities have decided to categorically reject the demands made by Cross’ kidnappers, nor will they free the political prisoners</p><p>10th October (six eighteen in the afternoon): Pierre Laporte, Vice-Premier of Quebec and Minister of Labour and Immigration, is kidnapped in front of his home, just as he was about to play ball with his nephew. Pierre Laporte was second in command of the Quebec Government, and as such, was, allegedly, afforded special police protection. But the first thing the police did – having been notified of the kidnapping within two minutes of the event – was, yet again, to go straight to the wrong place!</p><p>Vallière reports that « the six eyewitnesses of the kidnapping of Pierre Laporte (his nephew, his wife and their neighbours) are unanimous: the kidnappers were ‘clean cut’ and well dressed, a fact sergeant Desjardins confirmed to journalists that evening (…) Another witness, who worked in a petrol station on Taschereau boulevard, stated that shortly before the Minister was kidnapped, strangers had asked him how to get to rue Robitaille. ‘I thought they were policemen’, he said, because one was carrying something that looked like a walkie-talkie’ ».</p><p>Night of October 12th to 13th: the Army Mobile Command sends an emissary to Quebec’s Justice Minister, Jérôme Choquette, demanding he sign, in the name of the Bourassa cabinet, a letter requiring intervention by the armed forces. The cabinet was not then prepared to sign, and Choquette announces he would continue his efforts to persuade the reluctant elements.</p><p>15th-17th October: « for appearances’ sake» the Canadian Parliament debates the opportunity of proclaiming the War Measures Act. The Opposition puts up a show of protest until Saturday October </p><p>17th. Pierre Laporte’s body is thereupon discovered, « proving » a posteriori that the measures unleashed on October 16th had been needful.</p><p>15th October (two in the afternoon): the Canadian army begins to deploy in Quebec, at Bourassa’s request.</p><p>15th October (nine in the evening): Bourassa ups the ante, and lays down a six-hour deadline for the kidnappers to hand over James Cross and Pierre Laporte.</p><p>16th October (in the night): Quebec Premier Bourassa signs a letter written by Federal Justice Minister Marc Lalonde, instituting the War Measures Act. Several thousand soldiers were already deployed in the streets of Quebec and in the Federal Capital Ottawa. Through the War Measures Act – whose application need not be voted up by Parliament and that has NEVER been abrogated since – the curfew came down, civil liberties were suspended, and, inter alia, search of private domicile without warrant became lawful. Over four hundred people were arrested.</p><p>16th October (four in the morning): Meeting in Council, the Governor General, the Queen’s direct representative in Canada, approves the proclamation of a state of emergency, pursuant to which the War Measures Act comes into force automatically.</p><p>17th October (four in the afternoon): a member of the Cell that calls itself “Dieppe (Royal 22°)” (this is the name of a French Canadian regiment but that was not, oddly enough, at Dieppe in WWII, where many French Canadians died) calls into the CKAC radio station. Purportedly, this is a third and heretofore unknown FLQ cell. The caller announces that Pierre Laporte has been murdered. The earlier communiqués had all come from the FLQ cell known as Libération, that held James Cross, and that spoke on behalf of the Chenier Cell, the members of which were presumed to be the Pierre Laporte’s kidnappers. The Libération cell, that seemed to find the “Dieppe (Royal 22°)” business disturbing, put out a communiqué at mid-day, calling upon the press to blow the whistle on a “montage” (coup monté) by the Federal Government. The police prevented that communiqué from being published until December 8th.</p><p>Pierre Laporte’s body is found in the boot of the very car used to kidnap him (witnesses had taken down the car’s registration number at the time) later in the evening on the Saint-Hubert military base (!), right next to the Army Mobile Command. Given the prevailing State of Emergency, who, I ask, could have driven the car onto the base without being stopped and searched?</p><p>Credibility is stretched well beyond the breaking point here.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjnqwb3JSac7g96l6Kv8__y-AngwNZP-svs2lV4FSO1Hs0Y3G7rHoWJv9MJlNkbwaDS0uspUlyhlDtqPYhk20MUilRzUKER5GfCHJ1LzZdqIMbEShELcY0nJj2XGOtBoyTJYjYJ26-wEGhYmpkvuLL0gKrbzn00JH1G6rlmLR0bXOAHefV9JkU3jg=s575" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="425" data-original-width="575" height="474" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjnqwb3JSac7g96l6Kv8__y-AngwNZP-svs2lV4FSO1Hs0Y3G7rHoWJv9MJlNkbwaDS0uspUlyhlDtqPYhk20MUilRzUKER5GfCHJ1LzZdqIMbEShELcY0nJj2XGOtBoyTJYjYJ26-wEGhYmpkvuLL0gKrbzn00JH1G6rlmLR0bXOAHefV9JkU3jg=w640-h474" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;">In the hours following on the death of Pierre Laporte, the authorities put out a description of Paul Rose and Marc Carbonneau, but not that of Jacques Rose, Francis Simard or Bernard Lortie. Paul Rose, Jacques Rose and Francis Simard (presumed to be members alongside Bernard Lortie of the Chénier cell, while Marc Carbonneau and Jacques Lanctôt were part of the Libération cell holding James Cross) had been on police files and monitored since no later than 1968. The three had been in Texas (or perhaps Mexico) since September 1970, and had raced back to Quebec after James Cross was kidnapped. The many trips by Chénier cell members during the time Pierre Laporte was held (and the temporary gaoling of Jacques Rose and Francis Simard between October 15th and 17th) lead one to presume that it could only have been someone quite different keeping watch over the Minister, and that the actual role played by the cell in kidnapping and murdering him was secondary, perhaps even notional.</span></p><p>19th October: the house where Pierre Laporte was held and murdered, or so goes the official thesis, is « discovered »: 5630 rue Armstrong at Saint-Hubert, near the aforesaid military base bearing that name. That very house had been ransacked by police whilst the Minister might have been there, but nothing was turned up. Bourassa told Mrs. Laporte on 14th October that the police had found the place her husband was being held: « he will be freed within hours, we await the opportunity to do so without endangering [him] ». The question remains: was that safehouse 5630 rue Armstrong?</p><p>2nd November: the Federal Minister John Turner proposes an Emergency Measures Bill, based on the War Measures Act. The Emergency Measures Act was voted up on December 1st and came into force for five months.</p><p>3rd December: the Emergency Measures Act is signed into law by the Queen. The crisis was, at least apparently, over. Why the fresh Emergency Measures?</p><p>At that very moment, James Cross is freed, and his kidnappers in the Libération cell are given a safe-conduct to Cuba.</p><p>Late December: Paul and Jacques Rose, as well as Francis Simard are arrested. The coroner’s report is based upon unsigned confessions. Paul Rose never acknowledges, not even verbally, the confession attributed to him. Although he was actually firmly in police custody at the time, to avoid any risk whatsoever that he spill the beans in open Court, he was, unbelievably, tried in absentia!</p><p>31st March 1971: Paul Rose, Bernard Lortie and Francis Simard are sentenced to life imprisonment. Jacques Rose, who was tried later, was acquitted. The Prosecution Service declines to appeal. Jacques Lancôt and Marc Carbonneau were already in exile in Cuba.</p><p>If we are to go by the explicit terms of the War Measures Act, the entire country was about to go down in murder and mayhem. The truth is rather different: the FLQ was a tiny, two-cell organisation with a total membership of about ten! But we read, at Article 2 of the War Measures Act:</p><p><i>“<b>EVIDENCE OF WAR</b></i></p><p>The issue of a proclamation by Her Majesty, or under the authority of the Governor in Council <b>shall be conclusive evidence that war, invasion, or insurrection, real or apprehended</b> exists and has existed for any period of time therein stated, and of its continuance, until by the issue of a further proclamation it is declared that the war, invasion or insurrection no longer exists.”</p><p>Until 1970, the War Measures Act, first promulgated in 1914, had been proclaimed only twice before: when Canada entered the World War I, in 1914, and World War II, in 1939. Here, we are to take the Governor General’s personal opinion, as “conclusive evidence” of a State of War, that absolutely did not exist.</p><p>What did the victim himself think about all this? All that is known for certain, is that in none of his letters to Robert Bourassa whilst kidnapped did Pierre Laporte ever refer to the FLQ, nor did his wife, or most of his friends, ever buy the official story. A Royal Mounted Canadian Police (RCMP) report dated March 3rd 1971 states that Mrs. Laporte’s opinion was that the authorities had executed her husband.</p><p>There is a dreadful similarity between the Laporte kidnapping and murder, and that of former Prime Minister Aldo Moro in 1978, down to the detail of the police wandering about in circles in the vicinity of the safehouse. In both cases, subsequent events show that the real intention was never to free the kidnap victim, but to use the crisis to shift the balance of power in the country, in favour of rentier-finance interests.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiPiNt-lrz2O3dqrj8iLNS-JaPR8mJBa_7wqL2vLA9xlPYqQsuL47bRC-GsepC2XxSWJlK9YmR0Mr8Unhj7g2wdvyGSs7_WtM1Uf0fShZo_m6MExPg33EeY_FWUm8aqgIcUIeFTkiNdo-7HSOViq7uDuuvk15b21Phqb0fgeGeYSyFRCXe5hATwcg=s515" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="515" data-original-width="505" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiPiNt-lrz2O3dqrj8iLNS-JaPR8mJBa_7wqL2vLA9xlPYqQsuL47bRC-GsepC2XxSWJlK9YmR0Mr8Unhj7g2wdvyGSs7_WtM1Uf0fShZo_m6MExPg33EeY_FWUm8aqgIcUIeFTkiNdo-7HSOViq7uDuuvk15b21Phqb0fgeGeYSyFRCXe5hATwcg=w629-h640" width="629" /></a></div><p style="text-align: center;"><b style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">The Material Ease of Terrorists</span></b></p><p>It is rather astonishing that so many players from that time, have risen to positions of material ease and social prominence. Precisely at the point the synarchy has launched a fresh wave of strategy of tension in Europe and the Americas, they appear to want to keep a tight grip on the main players in the events of October 1970, in order to avoid their disclosing what really went on.</p><p>Ex-FLQer Jacques Lanctôt now owns his own publishing house, with a large stock-in-trade on cultural, sociological and psychological issues, and essays on the separatist movement. On March 28th 2004, Télé-Quebec broadcast a documentary called Hostage (Otage), comprised of interviews with Jacques Lanctôt, who kidnapped James Cross, and the Cross family. The documentary was finished in early 2004. </p><p>Lanctot is now a leading journalist with Canoe Inc. which is owned by Quebecor (whose Vice Chairman is none other than Brian Mulroney)</p><p>From 1996 to 2002, Paul Rose had achieved such a miraculous boost of success that he became the head of the Quebec wing of the New Democratic Party of Quebec! This Party merged with the Union des Forces Progresistes which in turn merged with two other organizations to become Quebec Solidaire which currently holds 7.6% of the seats in Quebec’s National Assembly. On March 14, 2013 Quebec Solidaire spokesman MP Amir Khadir introduced a resolution into the National Assembly to honour Paul Rose: <a href="https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/political-party-wants-to-honour-paul-rose-late-flq-kidnapper-following-his-death-1.1195522">https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/political-party-wants-to-honour-paul-rose-late-flq-kidnapper-following-his-death-1.1195522</a></p>Uncle Vladdihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07318000136835588115noreply@blogger.com0