Saturday, October 19, 2019

SO - WHAT IS JUSTIN TURDEAU (AND ALL OTHER LIBERTINE CRIMINAL HYPOCRITES) REALLY UP TO?

We Canadians wear plaid shirts because our nation was settled by Scots (and Krauts & Frogs). "Progressives" follow the religion of hypocrisy. Concerned Conservatives: "Hey, that proposal won't work because reasons!" Delinquent heedless reckless careless criminally negligent libertine "liberal" criminals: "I don't care what you say because I have hope ("Belief!" Faith!") that it will work, so I'm going to do it anyway! Whee!" (Rinse & Repeat). Generally, this translates into concrete terms as this: Conservative citizens: "Some people choose to become and remain criminals because they assess risks vs rewards and notice you libs let them get away with it! We should stop them!" Libs: "No that will never work because there's no free will and so no criminal intent. So we will only always coddle criminals as equally-helpless fellow victims. All punishment is mean and hateful and always wrong, and never a crime deterrent. Hope is a plan and ignorance is bliss! Whee!" Observation: as with all religions, delinquent criminals negligently invoke hope (aka: "Faith!" and/or "Belief!") and see ignorance AS bliss! Many such delinquent libertine criminal hypocrites are also passive-aggressives, enslaving people through flattery: "I'm sure you're better at that than I could ever be (so: YOU do it)!" Whee. For example, libertine politicians claim they can afford to run up debts because the economy is run by hard-working honest entrepreneurs who always know what they're doing, so, as the economy "inevitably" improves because of them, so will the amount of taxes paid increase, which will "naturally" counteract their proposed loan interest payment increases too. Whee. A famous recent example: "THE BUDGET WILL BALANCE ITSELF!" - Justine "Sunny Ways" Turdeau - Meanwhile, Conservatives always get portrayed as mean-spirited, nasty and OCD obsessively restrictive bean-counters who always put money before people. In short: (Libs:) "Hire (elect) me because, since there's no problems, there's nothing to fix - so there's this huge tax windfall just waiting to be spent" (yes, to them, tax money always just seems to magically arrive, apparently dropping from the skies like manna from heaven) "which we can then give back to you and spend on giving it back to you as 'FREE STUFF!' Government is Robin Hood, and our only job is delivering the goodies to you! We study "DELIVEROLOGY!" 'Whee,' indeed. Similarly, Turdeau claimed that his THE SKY IS FALLING carbon tax wasn't going to actually affect anyone, because he was going to give it ALL back in rebates. What's the point of a tax if and when one is going to simply refund it all?! What good does that do to stop or deter pollution, heal the planet, etc?! Either apparent liberal stupidity ("libtardation") really does approach the level of technical insanity - or the level of deliberate hypocrisy they show demonstrates how very stupid they are willing to risk their political careers betting on that the average voter is. Of course it's the latter, which is also why such hypocrites always pretend to value form over substance and image over reality; "etiquette" and "civility" (aka Tolerance of crime) over one being able to honestly and directly display anger while accusing a criminal of its crimes. They assert "We" (i.e: you) "all did, still do, or should do it" (go along with the criminal lie that there are no criminals) to get along (with all the other 'equally helpless fellow victims) too!" But all it really means is they pretend that not hurting feelings is more important than facts. That's why they demand pity (aka: "forgiveness" - because, to those who intentionally, deliberately and habitually always choose to attack thereby innocent other people in advance, pretending it's better to ask for forgiveness than for permission) as to them, all is allowed unless and until very specifically disallowed in advance, and so they are always entitled or "at liberty" - in their own heedless, reckless careless and criminally negligent, libertine way - to do whatever they want TO you, whenever and wherever they want to do it, at least as long as they can also pretend to have done it FOR your own good, too! Conservatives, of course, hold the opposite to be true: That all is disallowed in advance, that one can do nothing either TO, nor FOR, anyone else, without first getting their express permission in advance. The Golden Rule of Law principle which most simply defines all morality as "Do Not Attack First" ('attacks' being whatever one did not agree to accept) and that one must pay for what one takes. Criminals think they can use mob-rule might-makes-right 'democracy' to vote to change that, because it's not a crime if we all agree to do it, too, in advance. Republicans believe there are some rules which nobody can vote to change. And that's why all libertine "liberal" criminals are also Democrats, and all law-abiding, sane, non-hypocrite individualists are 'republicans' at heart, whether they know it or not. CAPISCE?

No comments: