A Jewish Defector Warns America

THEY WON'T LET THIS ONE STAY UP FOR LONG, SO DL IT WHILE YOU CAN!

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. 

Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

 A Jewish Defector Warns America

 Introductory Note

 Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

Benjamin Freedman Speaks:

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. 

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. 

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. 

And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. 

It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. 

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: 

"As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

WOODROW WILSON IS THE VERY SAME SHIT WHO ALLOWED THE BANKSTERS TO RULE THE USA BY MISCREATING THE FED!

;-(

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. 

There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. 

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. 

Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. 

Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. 

And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."

 And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. 

The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. 

Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

 Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. 

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? 

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman

"PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE" CENSORSHIP AND BOOK-BURNING CONFISCATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI LOBBY COME TO CANADA!

"PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE" CENSORSHIP COMES TO CANADA BY WAY OF AND IN DEFENSE OF ONLY THE FOREIGN NATION OF ISRAEL'S JEWS!

That old trope about how the "Road to Hell is paved with good intentions!" means THIS in real life:

Crime is defined as intentionally attacking thereby innocent others first.

"Crime prevention" is attacking thereby innocent other people first, too.

i.e: "We must arrest you to stop you from committing the crimes you have yet to commit! Only when everyone is safely locked up, will we finally achieve 'peace!' Always trade risky freedom for safe security (aka slavery)! 

(SO: DON'T THINK; JUST OBEY US)!

Whee!"

DITTO FOR ALL 'PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE' "HARM PREVENTION" MEASURES: THEY ARE CRIMES!

Since subjectively responsibility-averse libertine "Liberal" criminal leftopaths don't trust them selves to abide by any agreements, they also won't trust anyone else to, either, and so try to impose force by "governing" (defrauding enslaving and destroying) others' lives, to protect only them selves from us.

But in general, no force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can (or will) govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who CANNOT (or will not) govern themselves. 

These non-law guidelines for the Canadian Border Security Agents to confiscate books Jews deem "hateful!" from Canadian importers were drafted in 2017 under the compromised and corrupted globalist Trudeau regime.

The Canadian government is inducing its Border Security Agents to commit sedition against we the Canadian people, who are the real owners of this country, in order to forbid us from Noticing and prevent us from telling others about their crimes committed against us on behalf of the foreign Nation of Israel and its Rothschild bankster owners by inflicting their own self-hating anti-goyim Jewish "hate propaganda" on us!

In other words, they are, as all criminals do, accusing us of the very same crimes they commit against us!

Here's an official memo to "their" (our) CBSA enforcement agents, referencing Canada's ANTI-HATE-SPEECH "LAWS:" (And by it's description of verboten topics, it's pretty easy to see (((who))) it was obviously very specifically written to protect the alleged hurt feelings of, too)!

This was drafted to for Canada Customs and Border Security Agency (CBSA) teams to restrict imports of books and thereby deprive citizens of their freedom of thought rights and of free speech. As you can see, they are Hell-bent on trying to make sure nobody is allowed to Notice and complain about how these things are really happening!

From here: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.html

"D Memoranda" D9-1-15:

"Guidelines and General Information:

The Uniqueness of Hate Propaganda, Sedition and Treason Decisions in the Canada Border Services Agency’s (CBSA) Mandate

1. In the course of administering the many laws of Parliament that regulate, control or prohibit the importation of goods into Canada, CBSA officials deal with a wide range of goods.

2. Importation of certain categories of goods is prohibited under Customs Tariff item 9899.00.00. One category under tariff item 9899.00.00 involves material that is suspected of constituting hate propaganda, sedition or treason as defined in subsections 46(2), 59(4) and 320(8) of the Criminal Code. The Customs Tariff prohibits the importation of such material into Canada, including written, visual and audio materials.

3. Unlike many other goods routinely dealt with by CBSA officials, expressive materials have been found by the courts to be protected by the freedom of expression guarantee set out in subsection 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Although not specifically tested in the courts to date, it is believed (by whom is not mentioned; presumably only them selves) that, in respect to hate propaganda, sedition and treason, as with obscenity, the infringement of section 2(b) of the Charter is justified under its own section 1, because the overriding objective of the law is the avoidance of harm to society and that is a sufficiently substantial concern to warrant a restriction on freedom of expression."

GET IT? THEY PRETEND TO "BELIEVE" THAT THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND AND ADMITTEDLY EVEN WITHOUT LEGAL JUSTIFICATION, SHOULD BE INFRINGED BY THEM BECAUSE THEIR OWN SUBJECTIVE, LITERALLY AND SPECIFICALLY EMOTIONS-DRIVEN OPINIONS CONCERNING WHAT IS AND IS NOT YOUR "HATE," IS GOOD ENOUGH TO INFRINGE YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CHARTER RIGHT IN ORDER TO AVOID SOME SORT OF NEBULOUS "HARM TO SOCIETY!" CLEARLY, THIS ASSERTION IS ITSELF SEDITION, AS IT PRETEND TO JUSTIFY WITHOUT ACT OF PARLIAMENT OR BY EVEN BOTHERING TO HAVE ANY DULY-ELECTED OFFICIALS OF ANY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - WHETHER PROVINCIAL OR EVEN MUNICIPAL - TO ATTEMPT TO DULY LEGISLATE, EVEN BY INVOKING THE CONSTITUTION'S OWN "NOTWITHSTANDING" CLAUSE, ANY LAW/S TO JUSTIFY THAT, ONLY BY SPECIFICALLY AND LITERALLY "INFRINGING" THE HIGHEST LAW OF THE LAND, CAN THEY EMPOWER THEM SELVES ALONE TO "AVOID HARM TO SOCIETY" BY RESTRICTING THE CITIZENS' FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!

GET IT? "ONLY BY INFRINGING THE LAW CAN WE OURSELVES ENFORCE IT!"

THE IMPLICATION HERE IS, THAT BY MERELY BEING EXPOSED TO OTHERS' CALLS TO INCITE VIOLENCE, THE CITIZENS WILL AUTOMATICALLY AND INSTANTLY BECOME MINDLESSLY VIOLENT BECAUSE WE CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO THINK ON OUR OWN, AND OUR ACTIONS ARE ALL DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS!

Naturally, this also means that, as is usual, you and I are being pre-judged guilty of spreading "Hate Propaganda" merely by reading it - even before the National Socialist history book you ordered online has arrived from another country for you to have been able to make up your own mind as to the nature of its contents!

From memo 15:

From here: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.html

"Preliminary Examination:

10. During the initial examination of suspect goods, CBSA officials must scan for ... the targeting of an identifiable group (hate propaganda). 

Determining Whether Goods are Hate Propaganda:

Goods that constitute hate propaganda under the Criminal Code are those that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate or promote genocide or that publicly incite or willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.

SO WE ARE TO BE AUTOMATICALLY SLANDERED IN ADVANCE BY BEING PRESUMED GUILTY OF "PROMOTING HATRED" (AN EMOTIONAL EFFECT, NOT AN AUTOMATIC CAUSE OF VIOLENCE) AGAINST ANY GROUP WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY, BASED ON OUR OWN BRAINS' ABILITY TO DETECT PATTERNS, SUCH AS THAT A CERTAIN RELIGION PROMOTES A CERTAIN RACIAL GROUP OR ETHNICITY AS BEING SO INHERENTLY SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHERS THAT THEY ARE LITERALLY "AS GODS" IN COMPARISON TO THE OTHERS, WHO WERE MERELY CREATED BY THEIR OWN GOD "AS BEASTS" TO SERVE THEM  AS SLAVES IN ALL WAYS, INCLUDING BY THEREBY ALLOWING THEM SELVES TO RAPE US, (INCLUDING OUR CHILDREN) TO ROB AND KILL US AT WILL, AND EVEN EAT US, WITHOUT ANY MORAL OR LEGAL CONSEQUENCES WHAT SO EVER. THE IMPLICATION HERE IS THAT EVERYONE ELSE, OF ALL RACES etc., MUST IGNORE  CONDONE AND EVEN CELEBRATE THESE THREATS AGAINST US, RATHER THAN "ILLEGALLY" FEAR AND "HATE" THEM AS INHERENTLY EXISTENTIAL CRIMINAL THREATS TO GENOCIDE US!

Goods may be prohibited as hate propaganda if they advocate or promote the genocide of an identifiable group. Genocide is defined as acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group, either by killing members of the group or by deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.

THE JEWS' OWN TALMUD IS THUS ITSELF DEFINED AS "HATE PROPAGANDA" AS BY ENSLAVING ROBBING RAPING KILLING AND EATING OUR CHILDREN, THE JEWS WHO WROTE IT AND ENDORSE IT AS HOLY, INCITE OUR GENOCIDE!

8. Goods that incite or promote hatred against an identifiable group, by incorporating some or all of the following allegations, may be prohibited as hate propaganda:

(a) allegations that an identifiable group is to blame for serious economic or social problems;

(b) allegations that an identifiable group manipulates media, trade, finance, government or world politics to the detriment of society;

(c) allegations that an identifiable group is inferior or superior to another group; and/or

(d) allegations that an identifiable group weakens or threatens society, in whole or in part.

Well, isn't that strangely (and suspiciously) specific!

It's hard to imagine that if someone was a racist prejudiced against Black people in general, their first instinct would be to express that "hate" with the bizarre propaganda notion that, say, the inhabitants or governments of Chad, Sudan, or Nigeria had somehow taken over and were actively engaged in manipulating our media and financial banking system to corrupt our politicians and threaten society LOL!

It's also not the first thing we would think to accuse even another ethnically "White" group, say, the Swedes, of doing, had we some sort of inexplicably prejudicial "hatred" of them and their meatballs!

IT IS ALSO NOTABLE THAT THE JEWS' OWN TALMUD, IN ATTEMPTING TO JUSTIFY THE GENOCIDE OF ALL NON-JEWS, SIMPLY ASSERTS THAT THEIR OWN GOD DELIBERATELY CREATED US TO BE INFERIOR TO THEM, AND DOES NOT IN ANY WAY PRETEND THAT WE THREATEN THEM BY CAUSING THEM ANY SERIOUS ECONOMIC PROBLEMS TO WEAKEN ANY SOCIETIES' TRADE BY DINT OF MANIPULATING FINANCE TO SUBVERT THE WORLD'S GOVERNMENT POLITICS TO THEIR DETRIMENT; IN STEAD, THEIR BIBLE ITSELF OPENLY AND CLEARLY ASSERTS THAT THEIR OWN GOD COMMANDS THEY DO  IT TO US!

So, obviously, this can believably refer to only ONE very specific group - the Israeli Jews, especially the Rothschilds and their Israeli Jewish minions.

Yet also under the "exceptions" part of these their non-laws, the truth is supposedly a defense, and as we all know, the Israeli Jews themselves openly brag about owning the world through their banks, and of owning the global media through the five Jewish corporations which own them all.

Further, not only has the Rothschild Jew scion Klaus Schwab, CEO of their World Economic Forum, openly bragged about how the members of his "Young Global Leaders" school, specifying Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Adern as his exemplars, "penetrated the cabinets of world governments," but the very existence of this Canadian Border Security Agent Memo  itself, as it has been openly and proudly designed to specifically deprive Canadian citizens of their freedom of expression Charter rights, proves the success of his plan!

So these politicians and their Customs and Revenue Agency border guard minions are openly engaged in the very same seditious Jewish anti-goyim "hate propaganda"-based activities they are pretending to prevent! 

And it's being done on behalf of a group  which promotes its self as superior - Divinely Chosen, even - to any and all other groups, and by which we non-Jewish goys are, by their own Talmudic definitions, so inferior as to amount to nothing but beasts of burden in human form, to be enslaved, raped, killed and even eaten at will by them.

"Luckily," (for them) though, this memo also excuses such behavior on its very own religions claims grounds - so, since the Jews have declared "God told us to commit these crimes!" they aren't really crimes at all!

Whee!

"Determining Whether Goods are Seditious:

9. Goods that are of a seditious character are, for example, goods that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate the use of force, without the authority of law, as a means of accomplishing governmental change within Canada.

OBVIOUSLY, THE JEWS, BY DIRECTLY INFLUENCING THE CREATION OF SUCH DOCUMENTS AS THESE VERY MEMORANDA, HAVE CREATED "GOODS" WHICH BENEFIT ONLY THEM SELVES, BY DESCRIBING CANADIANS WHO DARE TO NOTICE THESE PATTERNS, AS "HATEFUL!" 

AND WHOSE RIGHTS ARE TO BE DEPRIVED BY THE FORCEFUL CONFISCATION OF THE INFORMATION THEY NEED - BY IN EFFECT DESTROYING AND HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR CRIMES - COMMIT SEDITION AGAINST CANADIAN CITIZENS BY PERPETUATING THE PERPETRATION OF THEIR ALREADY-ACCOMPLISHED GOVERNMENTAL CHANGE IN CANADA FROM A GOVERNMENT OF AND BY THE CANADIAN PEOPLE TO ONE OF BY AND FOR THE FOREIGN ISRAELI JEWISH BANKSTERS!

"Defences and Exceptions:

11. Goods that may constitute hate propaganda, through their willful promotion of hatred, will not be classified under tariff item 9899.00.00 if the goods are found to:

(a) communicate statements that are established to be true; ("BUT IF NOT YET PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW TO BE TRUE, WE WILL SEIZE ALL EVIDENCE OF SAME IN ADVANCE AND DESTROY IT, IN ORDER TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING USED TO PROVE THEM TRUE)!"

(b) predominately express, in good faith, an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;

i.e: "BUT STILL, IT'S ILLEGAL , AS JEWISH CRIMES AREN'T REALLY CRIMES BECAUSE THEY SAY THEIR OWN G*D TOLD THEM TO COMMIT THEM! WHEE!"

(c) be relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which is for the public benefit and, on reasonable grounds, are believed to be true; or

BUT STILL, THE CBSA'S OWN PROPERTY-SEIZING LEGISLATION INHERENTLY CONTRADICTS ITSELF BY PREVENTING THIS DISCUSSION!

(d) be intended, in good faith, to point out, for the purposes of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.

BUT THIS SHOULD LOGICALLY BE DETERMINED BY THE SEQUENTIAL PROCESS OF FIRST PART (c)  (AND THEN (a) (ABOVE)! AND AS THEY HEREBY PERMIT THEM SELVES TO INFRINGE OUR HIGHEST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, IN ORDER TO "PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFEND SOCIETY" FROM THE HARM OF BEING ABLE TO READ THE ALLEGED "HATE PROPAGANDA" BY SEIZING IT BEFORE IT CAN BE READ AND ANALYZED, THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THESE MEMOS DEPRIVES US OF ANY ABILITY TO POINT OUT, FOR PURPOSES OF REMOVING IT FROM ANY DOUBT, AND THUS FOREARMING SOCIETY AGAINST FUTURE MISAPPREHENDED AND UNCHALLENGED BELIEF IN ITS UNJUSTIFIABLY "HATEFUL" NATURE (THE WHOLE IMPLICATION OF THIS MEMO BEING THAT NO KIND OF HATE IS EVER GOOD, EVEN AS THEY HATEFULLY MADE ALL HATE INTO A CRIME TO FORBID US FROM HATING CRIMES AND THE CRIMINALS WHO COMMIT THEM) BY ATTEMPTING TO DESTROY BY DINT OF ITS PHYSICAL REMOVAL, THE VERY EVIDENCE OF ITS OWN ALLEGED HATE!

12. Similarly, goods that may constitute sedition will not be classified under tariff item 9899.00.00 if the goods are found to have only the intention, in good faith to:

(a)  show that Her Majesty has been misled or mistaken in her measures;

(FOR INSTANCE, BY ALLOWING THESE MEMORANDA TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE)!

(b)  point out errors or defects in the government or constitution of Canada or a province, in the Parliament or the legislature or a province, or in the administration of justice in Canada;

SUCH AS HOW THE CABINETS OF BOTH CANADA'S FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED (OR  "PENETRATED") BY WEF-TRAINED "YOUNG GLOBAL LEADER" TRAITORS? OR SIMPLY BY DINT OF SUCH MEMOS AS THESE, WHICH DESTROY EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED HATE-INCITING PROPAGANDA CRIMES BEFORE IT CAN BE READ AND ASSESSED?

(c)  procure, by lawful means, the alteration of any matter of government in Canada; or

(d)  point out, for the purposes or removal, matters that produce or tend to produce feelings of hostility or ill-will between different classes of persons in Canada.

YES, THE JEWS, WHO BY THE VERY EXISTENTIAL DEFINITION OF THEIR OWN RACIAL SUPREMACIST RELIGIOUS CREED ITSELF PROMOTE FEELINGS OF HOSTILITY AND ILL-WILL BETWEEN THEM SELVES AND ALL GOYIM, SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM CANADA, AND NOT THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR "HATEFUL PROPAGANDA!" IN THEIR OWN TANAKHS AND TALMUDS, TO JUSTIFY IT!

Other Considerations:

13. It should be emphasized that every suspect item is to be assessed in its entirety, with full recognition given to freedom of expression."

THAT'S RICH IN UNINTENDED IRONY, ISN'T IT? "FULL RECOGNITION"  OF OUR FREE EXPRESSION RIGHTS (EXCEPT AS PER ABOVE, WHERE THE BORDER GUARDS' OWN SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS DECIDE WHAT IS UNJUSTIFIABLY "HATEFUL" WITHOUT BOTHERING TO HAVE TO TAKE IT BEFORE A JUDGE IN A COURT OF LAW, THUS PRE-JUDGING PEOPLE WHO WANT TO READ IT TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY THEIR OWN RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR THEM SELVES WHAT IS AND IS NOT "HATEFUL!" TO THEM, TO BE IN STEAD DECIDED BY SOME LOWLY THOUGHT-POLICING BORDER GUARDS, FOR "PUBLIC" (JEWISH) "SAFETY!" AS IF BY MERELY READING IT, WE BECOME AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY OF PROPAGATING IT IN PUBLIC AS "HATE PROPAGANDA!"

IN FACT, BY DECLARING THEIR OWN RIGHT TO SPECIFICALLY "INFRINGE" OUR HIGHEST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, BY DESTROYING EVIDENCE BEFORE IT CAN COME BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT COURTS FOR JUDGMENT, PRESENTS ITSELF AS AN OBVIOUSLY SEDITIOUS ATTEMPT TO UNDERMINE OUR COURTS WHICH HAD THEM SELVES BEEN LEGISLATED INTO EXISTENCE BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT; SO: BY ACTING ON THESE MEMOS, THEY COMMIT TREASON!

And even if we ignore the emotional nonsense, they are still conflating "hate" propaganda with unlawful incitement to violence, by (again) pre-determining without any proof that one will do so unlawfully - because it is legal to call for and incite in public violence in response to ongoing crimes, for instance by demanding the return of the death penalty for REAL sedition and treason, such as is being perpetrated on Canada's citizens by these very same Jews and their compromised and corrupted "Canadian government" border security agents' own illegal activities here!

FURTHER, IN REGARDS TO SECTION 10: TREASON:

"Determining Whether Goods are Treasonable:

10. Goods that are of a treasonable character are, for example, goods that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate the use of force or violence to overthrow the Government of Canada or a province, or which communicate or make available to an agent of a state other than Canada, without lawful authority, any military or scientific information that may be used by the state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada."

These memoranda them selves serve that purpose, by advocating the guards forcibly deprive Canada's citizens - our real government - of our property and Constitutional right to read documents to make up and express our own minds, in deference to a hostile foreign nation's government; which is by definition prejudicial to our safety/defence!

But don't expect any court of "law" judge to defend your rights - they already all operate on the brazen rule of crime principle, where we are all pre-judged guilty until never proven innocent, just as these memos do. No judge in Canada would see anything wrong with being able to deprive us of our right to think and act for our selves, as the very purpose of "Muh Democratic Politics" itself is to force us to defer our own rightful self-reliant responsibility to think and act for our selves to our re-presentatives!

And so voting is also pointless because by doing it you betray your self - trying to have the right to become irresponsible gives away your right to be self-reliantly responsible to someone else. 

The politicians you hire ('elect') to defer your responsibility to think and act for your self don't initially betray you, because they're only doing the exact same thing you were when you hired them: like you, they are not thinking and acting for you, just as you initially refused to think and act for your self!

But it's still also TREASON, because these professional criminal hypocrite politicians put them selves and their party above the citizens lives! All they're doing is selling our country with delayed sales (bank "loans") to the Jewish Rothschild banksters - it all began when they realized they could take a tiny portion of the taxes earmarked to ensure our roads, watermains, sewers, electrical grids, air water and food inspections, hospitals firefighters police and military - the core job of government being as our largest collectively-owned insurance company, to defend our basic needs - to cater to their own and their followers' private wants, by leveraging it to pay a tiny bit of interest on huge loans to reward them selves with.

And they could thus expand their own fiedoms and powers by rewarding them selves their own families business partners friends and even some of followers without impacting the public services they were tasked to provide - until they had rinsed and repeated it too many times, and now they spend over 50% of the yearly tax budget on paying the sale-delaying bribes called 'interest' alone, which means they now have only half the money left to pay to fix much less expand that same basic infrastructure they swore to protect.

So now they're forced to force us to squat in place on the old crumbling infrastructure, to build up rather than outwards, as they angrily fear the loss of their own powers perks paychecks and secure pensions and 'projectively' blame us for OUR "unsustainable" greedy lifestyles, when what they really mean is they're scared they can't sustain their borrow and spend ones!

So they will herd us into tiny 15-minute neighbourhoods in their SM.A.R..T. (Surveillance Monitored Analyzed by Reporting Technology cities, eating ze bugs and happily owning nothing while they fuck off to their rewards on corporate directors boards in their make-work do-nothing "jobs" in China and Israel, while they gas us with their airborne "vaccines" like the dumb cornered rats their media has dummied us down to the level of!

IN CONCLUSION:

And the gist of these memoranda implicitly call for the destruction of all evidence of all past crimes; re:

"The overriding objective of the law is the avoidance of harm to society and that is a sufficiently substantial concern to warrant a restriction on freedom of expression.""

As such, it sets a very bad precedent, and in fact implicitly calls for the destruction of all precedents in criminal cases - and by extension in all civil cases as well.

For example, if the records of a criminal case where criminals had committed crimes against their innocent victims were to always be destroyed, to ensure that no one else could ever learn that the crimes had been committed, and also how, allegedly to protect the victims' feelings and to prevent anyone from ever learning how to commit new crimes along similar lines, it would also destroy the ability of the courts to set and learn from precedents in order to punish crimes, and it would also prevent our legislatures from learning from past crimes how to legislate against similar crimes in future.

The emotions-based, literally thought-killing ("psychotic") feeling behind this is that "Ignorance is bliss, and so if we destroy all records of past crimes, then no one will ever be able to imagine how to invent and perpetrate new crimes in future, either! Whee!"

Thus: "Destroying all evidence of past crimes is the best public policy to prevent future crimes. The best way to "avoid harm to society" is to deny to the public any knowledge that crimes can be committed, and how, lest the evidence of same serve as hate-inducing "crime propaganda!" Because if and when people learn about crimes, they will be instantly corrupted by them as "hate propaganda" to want to commit them!"

This is the level of retard cops are: "The only way to prevent crimes and catch criminals is by destroying all evidence of their crimes first!"

In the current example, let's just pretend that even if the Nazis were evil criminals, and the Jews their utterly blameless innocent victims, then despite the Jews' Nazi enemy criminals having already been caught and punished for their crimes by being defeated in WWII, no evidence of "Muh Holocaust!" shall be allowed to remain on the public record to hurt their feelings!

Is that really what the Jews behind this golem of a legislation want, or have they, simply by creating it, as always also thereby caused it to turn on them again, as usual?

After all, "If people learn about the Hate-ocaust, that knowledge alone will incite them to re-commit it!" 

Because all goyims are just intrinsically, inherently, inexplicably "Anti-Semitic!"

So, thanks, Jews!

;-)

Also available for your files to peruse and download from the CBSA's own website in handy .PDF format here:

https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.pdf

https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-17-eng.pdf

THE SPECIFIC ONGOING CASE SO FAR:

The final decision has yet to be made, but a female agent is in charge, (never a good thing) which means she's emotionally predisposed to act "hatefully" towards those who "display hate" no matter what or whom its righteous target may or may not be.

I've already drafted a response if they ask for it  - but even if I offer it, I'm SURE they will reject is, because it's based on logic, while they are programmed to act on emotion - after all, their whole focus is on subjectively determining the supposedly objective nature of my alleged "hate!"

And to prove it, the growly customs cop I spoke with on the phone (the same self-entitled asshole who 'flagged' my book) said I'd probably get to keep the Fuhrer Standard drink coasters and Nazi coin which were also included in my Christmas order, just not the Nazi book. There is no rational rationale behind what they do; it's all only based on their own emotions!

So even in advance of me being able to read the book which I paid good money to buy, they are tasked with preventing me form doing so because, allegedly just by letting me read it to learn its contents, I am somehow also presumed to be propagating "hateful" propaganda, and they can thereby somehow also determine in advance that I will be actively committing crimes by inciting violence in public.

In other words, they are pretending to be able to defensively, pre-emptively prevent in advance the alleged crimes they have illegally empowered them selves presume, without any need for any evidence at all, to somehow know in advance that I will "surely" commit!

But really, when you make "hate" into a crime, you only make it "illegal" to hate crimes - and the criminals who commit them.

Which seems to me to be the point of all this: to cover up crimes by blaming the potential victims for "hatefully" daring to Notice them.

Therefore (it's now a matter of principle to me!) I contacted the vendor (since obviously while the border cop was able to rip open my package and thumb his grubby rookers through my pristine book, I still didn't know its contents, since said Thought Police won't let me even see it) and he very promptly and helpfully gave me a list of the chapter titles, (having contacted the publisher?) to give me a better descriptor to use against them, too - so I will now be able to, at the very least, sue them in Small Claims Court for stealing my property.

From his helpful assessment, it should become obvious even to these self-blinded drones of "our" politicians' current global (((masters))) that:

"The publisher of the book is "Preuss Academic Review" and it's sold as a English language review of period literature. The price alone signifies it is not meant as propaganda as it's market is clearly those with a serious  academic/historical interest in the topic being discussed. From the chapter titles alone there sure doesn't seem to be anything in it that meets their criteria of hate propaganda advocating genocide etc etc. Chapters include:

Europe Becomes Healthy Again

The River of Heredity

Europe - Peasant Land

Duty

Germanic Piety

Faith and Hardness

If you want the daughter - look at the mother.

Eternal German Love Song

My Husband is not dead. He lives on in my children

Soul of the Woman

The Frankish Empire

How did our ancestors live ?

The moral foundations of Germanic Piety

Germanic man under the palm trees

The Great King ( Friedrich the Great)

Beauty with the SS rune (article on Allach porcelian)

Duty - The virtue of the Prussians

;-)

War criminal and New World Order promoter Henry Kissinger finally dead at 100

If you took a pen and piece of paper and charted all the varying opinions about Henry Kissinger's role as a mover and shaker of international events, you'd have a splotchy map that would include a continent labeled "Evil Genius," an island tagged "War Criminal" and an archipelago marked as the "Isle of Foresight." Talk about a controversial bureaucrat.

Kissinger's carefully plotted maneuverings of the United States' dealings with other countries during his time in the 20th century as head of the State Department has inspired reverence, censure, admiration, disapproval... There is little agreement on whether his influence has helped the U.S. or hurt our international standing. But he definitely helped Israel.

For me, he was the globalist's globalist, the Jew's Jew, the architect behind most of America's lost wars for empire and world hegemony for the last 50-plus years, and instigator of coups and the deaths of millions of people around the globe by the U.S. and U.S.-supplied weapons.

The former Secretary of State, long-time Council on Foreign Relations member and Bilderberger inspired people to shake in their boots. Because where Kissinger went, war followed.

The fossilized old war criminal, long-time friend-of-Hillary Clinton (through the CFR) and neocon war-making kingpin, and former "Never Trumper" — who met with Trump who subsequently promised that he and Kissinger were going to "stop the killing and death" in Syria — knew a thing or three about killing and death. But not much, it seems, about how to stop it.

In the 1970s as national security adviser, Kissinger oversaw the many U.S.-instigated coups throughout Central and South America, including the overthrow of Chili's democratically-elected government on September 11 (notice the symmetry?) of that year. What followed was 16 years of repression, torture and death under the fascist Augusto Pinochet and a healthy flow of profits to U.S. multinational corporations.

As The Intercept pointed out, in Kissinger's Shadow: The Long Reach of America's Most Controversial Statesman, Greg Grandin writes that as Richard Nixon's top foreign policy maker, Kissinger:

• Prolonged the Vietnam war for five pointless years.
• Illegally bombed Cambodia and Laos.
• Goaded Nixon to wiretap staffers and journalists.
• Bore responsibility for three genocides in Cambodia, East Timor, and Bangladesh.
• Urged Nixon to go after Daniel Ellsberg for having released the Pentagon Papers, which set off a chain of events that brought down the Nixon White House.
• Pumped up Pakistan's ISI, and encouraged it to use political Islam to destabilize Afghanistan.
• Began the U.S.'s arms-for-petrodollars dependency with Saudi Arabia and pre-revolutionary Iran.
• Accelerated needless civil wars in southern Africa that, in the name of supporting white supremacy, left millions dead.
• Supported coups and death squads throughout Latin America.
• Ingratiated himself with the first-generation neocons, such as Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz, who would take American militarism to its next calamitous level.

In The Trial of Henry Kissinger, Christopher Hitchens examined what he considered Kissinger's war crimes including:

• The deliberate mass killing of civilian populations in Indochina.
• Deliberate collusion in mass murder, and later in assassination, in Bangladesh.
• The personal suborning and planning of murder, of a senior constitutional officer in a democratic nation — Chile — with which the United States was not at war.
• Personal involvement in a plan to murder the head of state in the democratic nation of Cyprus.
• The incitement and enabling of genocide in East Timor.
• Personal involvement in a plan to kidnap and murder a journalist living in Washington, D.C. (syndicated columnist Jack Anderson).

In the aftermath of 9/11, after Kissinger was placed as co-chair of the 9/11 Commission (the fox guarding the hen house), he resigned rather than reveal the money his private consulting company made on fees paid by Union Carbide in the wake of the Bhopal, India disaster.

He also profited over the years, according to The Nation, by:

...making sure Saudi Arabia's and, until its revolution, Iran's growing mountain of petrodollars were recycled through private banks and arms merchants in Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States—undercutting Third World demands that capital be used to fund a more equitable global economy, what was then called a New International Economic Order.

Likewise, in Latin America and Eastern Europe, Kissinger Associates profited from what one of its consultants called the "massive sale" of public utilities and industries, a sell-off that, in many countries, was initiated by Kissinger-supported dictators and military regimes (Kissinger's fudging of the line between public policy and private finance, especially as it relates to the arms trade and petroleum extraction, echoes through many of the controversies of the Clinton Foundation; see David Sirota and Andrew Perez's reporting, especially "Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals from Hillary Clinton's State Department" and "As Colombian Money Flowed to Clintons, State Department Took No Action to Prevent Labor Violations").

This sell-off was part of the global transformation to what is commonly called "neoliberalism," and what in this campaign season has come to be known as Clintonism...

Kissinger, speaking of the North American Free Trade Agreement, once said: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system... a first step toward a new world order."

When Obama was elected, Kissinger believed Obama would be the one who would finally bring the new world order into being. In January 2009, days before Obama's inauguration, Kissinger said: "... he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It's a great opportunity, it isn't just a crisis."

Recall that I told you that the CFR had kidnapped Donald Trump. Which explains Trump's decision to bomb a Syrian air base over the fake news that Syria had used poison gas on its own people.

Kissinger once said: "When government controls food, it controls the people," and also opined that  people who reject the New World Order are terrorists.

Kissinger is proof-positive that America's wars are not for freedom and liberty but for profit and soft conquest.

Well, at least this meme is finished aging well:

Yours for the truth,

Bob Livingston 

It's a trap! The wave of repercussions as the Middle East fights 'The Last War'

Few people are familiar with a little event around 1200 B.C. called the Bronze Age Collapse in the region known as the Levant (now known as the Middle East). Most folks are taught that history and progress travel in a straight line and that each generation improves upon the culture and innovations of previous generations. This is a delusion constructed around a limited Smithsonian-influenced view of the past. In reality, history tends to go in a circle, or a spiral, with innovation leading to ease, ease leading to laziness and corruption, and corruption leading to weakness and collapse.

Over and over again, humanity reaches for Elysium on Earth only to be slapped back down again and again. The survivors then build grass huts on top of the ruins of the old empires, and they start over from scratch.

For a moment I want to talk about the Bronze Age and the catastrophe that broke it to pieces. The Levant at this time was rich with civilization and trade, composed of a host of kingdoms including the Egyptians, Babylonians, Minoans, Mycenaeans, Hittites, etc. They had vast economic networks, agriculture, industry and written libraries. The proximity of the kingdoms allowed for such extensive trade relations that this period is often referred to by modern historians as the first "globalized economy."

What took centuries to build was destroyed in a single generation by a series of disasters. A "mega-drought" caused kingdoms without major water resources to lose agricultural production leading to widespread famine and disease (yes, the climate can and does change dramatically regardless of human carbon footprint). Trade was disrupted by internal disputes, and a mysterious invasion of a group of nomadic raiders called the "sea people" is documented as a primary factor in collapse.

The Sea People attacked numerous kingdoms but were also refugees flooding into the region. They disrupted cultures and economies and dragged a number of empires into the dust. This all happened in less than 30 years. Sadly, because only the elites of these civilizations were able to read and write, many languages and historic documentation were lost.

This initiated a dark age that lasted for centuries. Humanity was set back, essentially to zero, while living among temples and pyramids of past generations. They must have looked up at those decaying marvels of architecture from hundreds of years ago and wondered "What the hell happened to us?"

Not everything perished, of course. The Egyptian dynasties were in decline, but they managed to hold together far better than their counterparts across the Levant. But the event represented a setback to human knowledge that was detrimental. One might suggest that if the Bronze Age Collapse never occurred, we might be a space-borne species traveling the stars by now.

Then again, maybe these cultures were so corrupted that they needed to fail so that something better could be built in their place.

What does any of this have to do with the state of the Middle East today?  The smart readers out there surely see what I'm getting at. The intricate relationships and trade mechanisms of the Bronze Age led to great wealth and prosperity, but they were terribly fragile. That same interdependency resulted in their demise as they tumbled like dominoes on top of each other.

The globalization of today is leading to a similar worldwide implosion. Our irrational ties to foreign entanglements and economies could very well destroy civilization again. Consider what are we about to see as the Israel/Palestine war unfolds...

Multiple Nations Dragged Into The Conflict

I will make my position on the situation clear... I don't care about either side. The same goes for Ukraine and Russia. Their wars are not our wars, and I am highly suspicious every time any political leader tries to lure Americans into choosing one side or the other. To summarize, all wars are banker wars.

The Israelis enjoy our money, but they have a history of proven illicit operations to lure us into war in the past (USS Liberty, anyone?). The Palestinians and most of the Muslim world despise the West and Christianity in general (and I don't really care who started it, the fact remains that our cultures are completely incompatible).

Both sides use tactics that actively target civilians. I'm not talking about collateral damage like we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan, I'm talking about groups that are consciously engaged in plans for genocide. Bottom line?  There are no "good guys" to join with. It's a complete s**t show of ancient tribal nonsense that we should stay away from.

Corporate media and some political leaders are already suggesting that the recent full-scale attack on Israel was planned by governments outside of Gaza. Some are accusing Iran, and others accuse Lebanon. From the extensive amount of footage of the attack that I have examined, I have no doubt that someone other than the Palestinians planned the event. The tactics were far too advanced and far too coordinated; the Palestinians have never been all that smart when it comes to military strategy.

Who planned the attack is another question entirely. So far there are a lot of rumors but no hard evidence leading to any specific governments. Another big question is, how did the Palestinians manage to organize all of this and execute the invasion WITHOUT Israeli intel services knowing about it?  Mossad is known to be one of the most intrusive and pervasive covert agencies in the world, yet they were caught completely off guard by this massive attack?

I think not. I'm reminded of the events of 9/11 and the strange series of intelligence failures that preceded it. I'm also reminded of the lies, propaganda and reactionary response, which led to two decades of meaningless war.

I'm going to call it here... in a couple of weeks, we will find out that many of the soldiers involved in the incursion were NOT Palestinian. Some of them will be from Iran, Syria, Lebanon, etc. There will be intel that says Iran was a major backer of the plan (The Wall Street Journal already claims this is the case, but they have not provided any compelling proof, yet).

A U.S. carrier strike group is on the way to the region now, and this is just the beginning. Europeans will be pressured to go to war, American conservatives in particular will be waterboarded with propaganda telling us that an "attack on Israel is an attack on the U.S.." It will be a lot like the rhetoric Neo-cons and leftists used during the initial invasion of Ukraine but multiplied by a hundred. And, both Biden and Trump have been rattling sabers and testing the waters of war, so don't think that we can avoid this simply by voting.

East vs West

Depending on the extent of the Western reaction, the BRICS nations may be compelled to get involved as well. This may not be on a kinetic level, but there is a chance. Russia has strategic treaties with Iran and Syria. China has numerous economic interests and influence in the region as the world's largest importer/exporter.

These nations might retaliate with the same kind of financial warfare that the West used against Russia — with China and the BRICS cutting off the dollar as the world reserve currency. This would add to the crippling inflation we are already experiencing.

Terror Attacks And False Flags

If you were wondering when the next major terror attack/false flag was going to hit the U.S. or EU, wonder no longer. I would be shocked if we made it another six months without multiple attacks tied back to Islamic groups. Some of them will be real and some of them will be staged, and telling which is which will be difficult.

The thing is, wide-open borders in the West have made this far more possible — and the establishment knows it. In my opinion, they WELCOME it. If they can get at least one crazy Muslim to shoot up a strip mall or blow up a football stadium, they will have all the leverage they need to hook Americans into foreign conflicts that don't concern us.

Europe in particular is playing with fire. National governments and the EU have invited tens of millions of these people to their doorsteps and now they have a problem. There are Sharia Law communities all over Europe, there are millions of military-age Muslim men with every opportunity to do great harm. And there are millions of woke leftists currently cheering them on, thinking that they will not be affected and that this is some form of "decolonization."

Closure Of The Strait Of Hormuz, Skyrocketing Oil Prices

I have been warning about this scenario for many years; it was only a matter of time before tensions with Iran gave them a rationale to close the Strait of Hormuz and shut down 30 percent of all oil exports from the Middle East to the rest of the world. Keep in mind, Europe is suffering extensive energy inflation, in part because of the economic crisis and also because of sanctions against Russia.

Biden has been trying to hide inflation by dumping oil from the strategic reserves onto the market, but now those reserves are the lowest they have been in decades and, conveniently, this happened right before the strike on Israel. Our reserves are depleted as we go to war. Oil prices and gasoline prices will explode if Iran is implicated in the Israel attack. Iran will run a few giant oil tankers into the Hormuz, sink them, and make the strait impassable for months. Don't be surprised if we see $200 per barrel of oil next year, which will translate to around $7 per gallon gas or higher for much of the U.S.

A Push For A New Draft

Let's be honest, current U.S. recruitment numbers are a joke and the woke-ification of our military is making it weaker by the month. No American with a legit warrior mindset or combat aptitude is going to join. The establishment will try to regale conservatives and patriots with tales of "fighting the good fight for family and country" but most will not buy in. With attempts to ignite multiple fronts against Russia, China and the Middle East, they will start talking about a new draft system.

My belief is that this will fail miserably and would start a civil war rather than fill the ranks of the Army or Marines, but they may have a scheme to deal with this outcome...

Is This the Real Reason Why U.S. Officials Are Encouraging The Migrant Invasion?

During the Bronze Age Collapse, certain empires (like Egypt) survived using an odd tactic – Instead of fighting off the invading hordes of refugees, nomads and sea people, they HIRED them and inducted them into important positions within their military. Corrupt authoritarian rulers ultimately found that they faced more of a threat from their own starving peasants than they did from the outsiders, so they joined with them to put down local rebellions.

This might not be as useful in Europe, but in the U.S. I wonder if this was the intention all along; to bring in millions of military-age foreigners with little sympathy for the existing culture, then in the midst of collapse offer them automatic citizenship and benefits if they join the military. Not on the small scale the federal government has today, but on an enormous scale the likes of which we have never seen.

Maybe the plan was always to leave the gates open and allow illegals to stroll in so that they could act as a mercenary contingent to fight in foreign wars or fight against American citizens should rebellion arise?

Plan C

The timing of the conflict in Israel is incredibly beneficial to globalists, and this might explain Israel's bizarre intel failure. Just as U.S. and British leaders had prior knowledge of a potential Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 but warned no one because they WANTED to compel Americans to fight in WWII, the Palestinian incursion serves a similar purpose.

The COVID pandemic and mandates failed to get the desired result of a global medical tyranny. The war in Ukraine failed to get the desired results as the warhawks' demands for boots on the ground against Russia fell apart. Perhaps this is just Plan C?

The establishment seems particularly obsessed with convincing U.S. conservatives and patriots to participate in the chaos; there are a number of Neo-cons and even a few supposed liberty media personalities calling for Americans to answer the call of blood in Israel. Some have described the coming conflagration "the war to end all wars."

I believe that the real war is yet to truly start, and that is the war to erase the globalists from existence. They want us to fight overseas in endless quagmires in the hopes we will die out. And when we do, there will be no one left to oppose them. It's a predictable strategy, but its success is doubtful. Another interesting fact about the Bronze Age Collapse — the elites were some of the first groups to be wiped out after the system broke down.

To truth and knowledge,

Brandon Smith