http://johnshelbyspong.com/2016/01/14/charting-the-new-reformation-part-vii-re-imagining-god-not-a-being-but-being-a-place-to-begin/
This is the latest hot topic of debate among those Gretta Vosper supporting UCC lunatics.
Hey tards (as I tell the muslims almost daily) when your God is generally only "Everything!" then it's also specifically only "Nothing!" (Existentialism IS Nihilism)!
Islam describes it's "allah" as both "unknown" and "unknowable."
These false 'christians' so-desperately want rights, (as Vosper does, to their authority and salaries,) without any responsibilities (like, to actually preach Christian gospel) that they won't even pimp the brand! They all claim they no longer see their god as a person at all, much less the specific one known to the world as Jesus Christ. And it isn't only some heretical laypersons, either - it's the entire leadership of their so-called clergy itself! And they're proud of their 'radical' leftist approach, too!
Any other company spokesperson who admitted in public "I don't believe in the brand any more!" would have the conscience and self-esteem to resign, but not these most idolatrous of delinquents!
I guess the years of getting away with presenting their unprovable opinions as facts has finally led down that metaphorical slippery-slope to its logical conclusion, where they can feel perfectly free to cast off the chains of doctrine and just make up anything they want to say about their new religion and expect to be believed.
Unreal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment away! You're responsible for your own posts, but if you don't address the topic, &/or engage in pointless critical thinking logical fallacy distractions, diversions, deflections and evasions of the fact that you have to facts, your comments may be edited, moderated, deleted or just plain laughed at. If you post threats, they will not be removed, but will in stead remain as evidence of your crimes, for LEO's to use in tracing back to you, to deal with appropriately.
I especially won't tolerate the usual liberal slanders / Ad-hominem / un-justified personal attacks, nor the Argumentum Tu Quoque (i.e: "Evil crime / islam isn't really an evil crime, because we - i.e: you - all do it, too!") fallacies;i.e: COMPARING TWO OR MORE UNRELATED WRONGS WON'T EVER MAKE ONE OF THEM RIGHT. Capisce?