Wednesday, October 7, 2015

DISARM BLACK MALES!!!

Cantwell nails it again!

Gun control advocates like to spout off numbers to support policies. 

 But by the numbers, it makes more sense to be a racist than a gun control advocate.


Even as a staunch gun enthusiast and opponent of any and all gun regulations, I have to admit it.

America has a very serious problem with gun violence. 11,208 of the 16,121 homicides committed in 2013 were committed using firearms, according to the CDC. That is a rather glaring figure which gun control advocates understandably find difficult to ignore.


Much talk has been made of “common sense” gun safety laws, and perhaps obviously, what counts as common sense depends on who you talk to. Much of the rhetoric has surrounded bans on “assault weapons” and “high capacity magazines” but in reality, of the 8,855 gun murders recorded in 2012 – a staggering 6,371 were carried out with handguns, according to FBI data. This happened despite all but seven US states requiring a permit or license to carry a concealed weapon (this number was even lower in 2012).

With this in mind, it is silly to talk about restrictions on what types of firearms people can or cannot have. If we are going to say that firearms are the problem, then it makes no sense to focus on the weapons least frequently used in murders. Mass shootings make headlines and everybody cries “for the children,” but the fact of the matter is thousands of people are dying at the hands of the most basic weapons available. If we’re going to focus on guns, let’s focus on them in a realistic way.

Now, if government serves any legitimate purpose at all – that purpose ought to be to protect us from criminal violence. It should do so in a way that is minimally invasive, and maximally effective. It should provide the greatest good, to the greatest number. That’s what democracy is all about.

If we look up what cities have the highest murder rates in the United States, we rapidly notice a pattern developing.
According to the data from Neighborhood Scout, there were 156 murders in these four cities, with a total population of 215,997. That’s a murder rate of 72.22 per 100,000 people, second only to Honduras, the murder capital of the world.

The race pattern continues as we go on down the list, but I won’t bore you with all of those numbers. New Jersey and Illinois have very strict gun control laws, while Indiana and Pennsylvania have more relaxed controls, but haven’t gone full on constitutional carry. This dramatic variance in restrictions amongst the top four murder rates in the country shows a higher correlation for race than it does for gun control.
Disarm Black Males
Disarm Black Males

Nationwide black people make up approximately 13.2% of the population, yet they commit more than half of all murders in the United States, according to the FBI – and if you really think #BlackLivesMatter, it’s worth pointing out that most of the time they are killing other blacks.

Nearly 90% of all murders where the sex of the offender is known are male offenders, according to the FBI.

We can thus say, that black males are roughly 6.6% of the population, yet they are committing more than 50% of all the murders in the United States.

Gun control advocates like to point out that there are roughly 310 million privately owned firearms in the United States. “One for every man, woman, and child” is often touted.

That means less than 0.00362% of the guns in this country are committing 100% of the gun murders, while more than 0.014% of black males are committing more than half of them. Thus, there is a greater correlation between race and murder, than gun ownership and murder.

This can also be seen throughout the world. Switzerland is just behind the US and Yemen in terms of private gun ownership per capita. Yet they have a per capita murder rate ranking 209 out of 218 countries. They are also almost entirely white.

Compare this to South Africa, with the 11th highest murder rate in the world. In South Africa, ownership of a firearm is conditional on a competency test and several other factors, including background checking of the applicant, inspection of an owner’s premises, and licensing of the weapon by the police introduced in July 2004. It can take up to 90 days to get a license. They also have the highest rapes per capita on Earth, as an aside.

So if you really want some “common sense gun safety laws”, I would suggest making it illegal for black males to own guns. It would be a minimally invasive policy, it would require no background checks, federal resources, complex forms, or electronic equipment. It would only impact 6.6% of the population, but (by the logic of gun control advocates) it could reduce the murder rate in the United States by as much as 35%.

And besides, (by the logic of gun control advocates) it isn’t as if you would be taking any fundamental right away from these magnanimous individuals. You would just be protecting them. Blacks kill each other far more often than police kill them, and people are burning cities to the ground over police violence.

In case it’s not painfully obvious by now, I’m not seriously advocating this as a policy. But the data here is real. So when your liberal friends spout off about what terrible people we are for “clinging” to our guns, feel free to point out that it would actually make a lot more sense to be flat out unapologetic racist.



Tuesday, October 6, 2015

What is the TPP?

WORST-CASE SCENARIO:

In one word? It’s TREASON.

See, even if it wasn’t full of secret globalist corporate control stuff, (which will open up the country to globalist corporazi bankster control, which means unlimited muslim invaders) it’s still insane because it wants to open up full trade with China.

China is a giant corporation (Sinocorp) which by definition means their taxpayers subsidize EVERYTHING there by default.

And since our corporations already all outsource their manufacturing to China, what good will it do?
Are we supposed to believe we can buy all the components for what we make from them wholesale right now, but it’ll be even better when we try to sell them back to them at marked-up retail prices?!

Who (OK: Obama, Stephen Harper and Jistin Turdeau) is stupid enough to even pretend to believe that nonsense?!

Here’s what will really happen: As usual, China lets us set up factories there to produce our widgets for cheap. As usual, at the same time, they copy our products and make them themselves for even cheaper.

But now, with this idiot “Great Trade Deal!” in place, our stuff will have to compete directly with theirs!

And worse (see Sinocorp subsidies, above) they can make all their shipping costs to North America disappear, in order to undercut EVERY industry we still have left here.

It’s just as bad as our farmers thinking they can sell their products there or in India, after adding on all the shipping costs – it will simply never happen.

All the TPP will do, is open us up to losing our industries!

We will be undercut at every turn.

No manufacturing or jobs here = no taxes here = no government here = no country here!

;-(

UPDATE:

Tonight I was lucky enough to actually confront one of the TPP's negotiators, so I put all those hard questions to her directly!

First off, I was advised not to worry about that WORST case scenario, because the TPP doesn't include China - or India!

(She agreed with my above assessment in principle; hope she remembers it if she's still employed in the government's treaties-negotiating office if and when any deals with China are struck)!

Secondly, now that they've finished the secret negotiations, they've released hundreds of pages of it online, detailing exactly what's in it, how we benefit (and when) and how we lose out, here:

http://www.international.gc.ca/media/comm/news-communiques/2015/10/02a.aspx?lang=eng

http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/index.aspx?lang=eng

Njoi!

;-)

Friday, October 2, 2015

THE UNIVERSITY’S DEPARTMENT OF RACISM

This isn’t made up. These free-form liberal slanders have to be stopped.
From The Ottawa Citizen, Wednesday, September 30, 2015, P.# C6, and from here:
Racism abounds in election campaign
WHY SHOULD WE?! WE GAVE THEM THE FUCKING MONEY AND THEIR OWN CHIEFS STOLE IT FROM THEM AND SQUANDERED IT GAMBLING IN MONACO. 
SO THEY SHOULD LEARN SOME SELF-RELIANT PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.
FUCKING RETARD – AND THAT’S ME BEING KIND: GIVING YOU THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT THAT YOU'RE SUCH A HABITUAL CRIMINAL THAT YOU ARE NO LONGER CAPABLE (WITHOUT MY PSYCHIATRIC HELP!) OF REALIZING ANY MORE THAT YOU ARE, IN FACT, NOTHING MORE THAN A CRIMINALLY SLANDEROUS FRAUD AND PARASITE!
—————
So despite the article’s title, there wasn’t a shred of proof or any facts sourced or cited to make even the most feeble attempt to prove the current election has any kind of a ‘racist’ component whatsoever. As usual it was only ad-hominem slander (fraud)!
In stead, I guess, we’re all just supposed to feel guilty for actions taken by those in charge in a time of War – World War II, to be precise. And most if not all of those people are all dead now. We're "racists" because we oppose a genocidal enemy culture.

DiversityChampionLogo