Thursday, May 6, 2021

Guilt, Condemnation, and Totalitarian Punishment



From here: 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/guilt-condemnation-and-totalitarian-punishment_3792907.html

We don’t hear much today about the religious doctrine of damnation—the belief that everlasting punishment awaits sinners. How much of that is due to religionists moderating their theological views or simply the ongoing secularization of society is an interesting question.

Regardless, although such harsh judgmentalism may cause uncomfortable tensions between people, it generally is harmless. We have a separation of church and state that, while protecting the free exercise of religion, doesn’t confer the ability of any sect to impose its doctrines forcibly on others. Religionists may condemn us verbally or in their hearts, but they have no power to control or punish us. That’s the Creator’s prerogative, and we’ll just have to wait until we leave this world to see how accurate those bleak pronouncements of damnation are.

There is, however, a doctrine of guilt, condemnation, and punishment that threatens every American’s earthly well-being and happiness. I’m referring to the political left’s fanatical embrace of certain quasi-religious doctrines—specifically, that Americans collectively are guilty of various sins that merit condemnation. The progressive punishment for our sins is to subject us to a stern totalitarian agenda that offers the only salvation from our alleged sins.

In this humanist “religion,” progressives, socialists, pagan environmentalists, et al., have assumed a moral superiority that they believe confers upon them the right to act as judge and jury, to pronounce America and Americans “guilty” of alleged sins and to condemn and punish us by forcing us to submit to their elitist plans.

The form of that punishment—indeed, the only way for us to expiate our “sins” in their eyes—is for us to submit to the progressives’ own radical socialistic central economic plan that offers salvation if we “transform” our society into a progressive utopia. The essence of their all-encompassing central plan is to impose government control over our thought, our speech, and our lives.

Let us briefly review a few of the guilt trips that leftists are using to justify imposing tyrannical measures on the American people to achieve their utopian vision.

1. White Guilt

Epoch Times contributor Larry Elder gave a marvelous talk last week at Principia College during which he powerfully debunked the myth of white guilt. (You can read more in Elder’s book “What’s Race Got to Do with It?” and in his interviews with The Epoch Times. See also Brandon Tatum’s views.)

Leftists seek to impose collective guilt on white Americans—many, both living and dead, who have steadfastly fought for, promoted, and defended racial justice—for the sins of certain white individuals, most of whom have long been dead. Blind to the reality that there are racists among all races, the collective condemnation of an entire race is itself racist. It also illustrates the perversity of “social justice”—collectivist remedies that unjustly trample the rights of innocent individuals.

Trying to punish so-called “white guilt” is also unwise and counterproductive. Once you start trying to indiscriminately punish a whole race of people for the past sins of others, you have opened a Pandora’s box. Think of Israelis and Arabs in the Middle East—the more they try to settle old scores, the more the present generation suffers. Do we want our children to shoulder the same burden of hatred, injustice, and violence that so devastated the lives of our ancestors, or can we love them enough to break the cycle of conflict? (Indeed, imagine what a hostile place the world would be if white Americans were to seek vengeance against the descendants of the often cruel and unjust oppressions of their own ancestors.)

2. Success Guilt

Dennis Prager wrote about this just last week. Both Jews and Americans have shared a cultural history that was to a considerable degree shaped by their religious faith in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Both of these related cultures have achieved outstanding success relative to other societies and cultures in the world. Sadly, success has triggered the envy, resentment, and hatred of many who were born into societies where those cultural values and the success they tend to spawn have been absent. How dare those Jews and Americans accomplish so much! They must be punished for such effrontery.

3. Capitalist Guilt

Prager alluded to this, too, in his column. Anti-capitalism has been around for nearly two centuries—ever since capitalist entrepreneurs found ways to lift the masses of people out of poverty. The great Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises published a book titled “The Anti-Capitalist Mentality” in 1956 in which he diagnosed the feelings of inferiority that anti-capitalist intellectuals struggle with. Many of these highly educated intellectuals just can’t stand seeing the masses of people richly reward entrepreneurs who serve their needs and desires while at the same time placing relatively little value on the intellectuals’ abstract philosophies and academic ideologies. Billionaires (unless they’re pigging out with government subsidies) are society’s benefactors. They deserve our gratitude, not our hostility.

The anti-rich-people animus stems from gross economic ignorance, such as persistent belief in the long-defunct 16th-century Montaigne dogma, which falsely asserted that one man’s gain is another’s loss. More than two centuries of capitalist history have shattered that fallacy.

4. Profit Guilt

Indeed, as even Karl Marx understood, capitalism excels at producing wealth, and yet Marx and his followers today decry the profit-making process that has made possible today’s unprecedented wealth for an unprecedented number of people.

It’s tragic that so many Americans don’t understand two crucial aspects of profits: First, profits are new wealth; the only way for a society to get richer is through the production of additional value—value that is signaled by profits. Second, because entrepreneurs in a capitalist system compete to best serve the people’s wants, while businesses in socialist systems have to produce what their political rulers—a socialist society’s elite—command. Obviously, people are going to be better off when production is oriented toward their preferences than the government plan’s dictates.

5. Prosperity Guilt

A core value of today’s environmentalism is the misanthropic and incredibly wrong belief that human prosperity is an evil that will render Earth uninhabitable. These ideologues are ignorant of the environmental “Kuznets curve.” It’s a total myth that the more prosperous people get, the more polluted their environment gets. The way the world really works is that after an initial increase of pollution as poor societies climb out of subsistence standards of living, the increasing wealth of those societies enables them to direct wealth and effort to the cause of environmental protection. The felicitous result is that economically advanced countries pollute less than developing countries.

Alas, so fanatical are greens in their belief in the evil of humanity that they remain willfully blind to two great environmental blessings that have come to the present generation: First, that temperatures have modestly risen above the grimly cold Little Ice Age, making life safer; second, that the CO2 enrichment of Earth’s atmosphere over the past century has produced a huge greening of the planet. We should celebrate, not mourn, but the funereal guilt-mongers want us to mourn.

Condemnation

So, here’s the upshot of all the guilt trips that leftists are foisting on us: In the grip of their beliefs—their fanatical, unquestioning faith in the guilt of the American people for the above-listed “offenses”—the left condemns all who dare to dissent from their catechism. We dissidents are, ipso facto, bad people; thus, we deserve to suffer and be punished for our sins.

There’s no nuance in the leftists’ thinking, no mitigating factors, no sense of context; non-leftists are wrong—period. Consequently, the United States gets no credit for the considerable progress we have made and continue to make. Instead, we’re deemed guilty because we haven’t yet fully realized our ideals. As I’ve written before, to leftists, the perfect has become the mortal enemy of the good.

If, by the way, you object to my characterization of leftists as “fanatical,” perhaps “messianic” would be a more appropriate adjective. Think of Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) who, when unveiling the grand socialist central economic plan known as “the Green New Deal,” described the proposal as “a mission to save all of creation.” All of creation?! If that isn’t messianic, then nothing is. Be aware of how often leftists use the religious language of salvation. Often when they promote their vision, they assert that their policies are necessary to “save” us—and tragically often, to save us from imaginary problems (e.g., wealth, success, a greening world, etc.).

This messianic zeal has congealed into a hatred of conservatives, libertarians, Republicans—literally any American who dissents from the leftist agenda. The left has become a Leninist movement, embracing hatred of their political opponents with all the fervor that Lenin himself mustered.

Totalitarian Punishment

The hatred that the left feels toward their political opponents is manifest in their aggressive attempts to obliterate, destroy, and smash those opponents by canceling and silencing them. It’s seen in their blatant effort to do an end-run around democracy by resorting to such machinations as D.C. statehood, packing the Supreme Court, dictating election rules to states, ramming through legislation with zero opposition input or support, etc.

Under the intoxicating influence of what I’ve termed “the three meta-errors” of progressivism (faith in government competence, belief in human willpower, and the tyranny of good intentions), the left feels perfectly justified in arrogating totalitarian powers to themselves. They may call it “democratic socialism,” but it’s anything but democratic.

Like Marx, Lenin, and other past socialist revolutionaries, today’s left believes that the end justifies the means. They seem to have convinced themselves that by dictating a radical top-down central plan on the American people, the result will be a bright, utopian future. Don’t hold your breath.

If you want to find the utopia that the left desires, go to Washington, D.C., take a hard left, and look for it between the unicorn farm and Atlantis. No radical social plan animated by hatred for people and based on mutilations of truth can possibly bless the human race. If you need to see it in black and white, check out “The Black Book of Communism”—communism being the end of the road that Marx said starts with democracy and passes through socialism. The human race has suffered enough from the socialist/communist virus.

To advocate socialism today can only be explained by a rejection of reason and an adherence to a secular faith that elevates hope over experience. The fanatical adherents of this quasi-religious dogma, having judged American society guilty of cardinal sins, have condemned us to a state-imposed hell that’s becoming increasingly totalitarian by the day.

The good news is: We Americans are not guilty of the sins with which the left has charged us. There is, then, no justification for condemnation and no need for the totalitarian agenda that they’re pushing. As has ever been the case, America and Americans will flourish if we remain free of dictatorial government plans and controls.

Mark Hendrickson, an economist, recently retired from the faculty of Grove City College, where he remains a fellow for economic and social policy at the Institute for Faith and Freedom.

Where Can You Send Your Children to University?

Where Can You Send Your Children to University?

From here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/where-can-you-send-your-children-to-university_3780573.html

(This article was way too good to let the Epoch Times post alone LOL)!

"Liberal arts education, as I experienced it at Antioch College in the late 1950s and early 1960s, was aimed at opening students’ minds to the intellectual life of Western culture.

Students were asked to consider such questions as “What counts as a good life?”, “How do people’s ideas and actions differ from place to place and time to time?”, “What is the basis of social life?”, “Do people have free will or is life determined?”, “Where does wealth come from?”, “Is science different from other belief systems?”, “What is beauty?”, “Who should govern?”, and many others engaged with literature, languages, and science.

Liberal arts education relied on academic values derived from the Enlightenment. These are openness in the search for truth, merit-based selection of personnel, and academic freedom for diversity of thought. These values are based on, as Gad Saad puts it, “the defining ethos of the West, namely the unfettered commitment to the pursuit of truth.” Both merit-based selection of personnel and freedom for diversity of thought are structural conditions for the search for truth, as both are required for a fruitful exchange and competition of ideas in an intellectual marketplace.

During the past four decades, liberal arts education was canceled, and is now deceased. Postmodernism assassinated the idea of “truth,” claiming that all knowledge is subjective and that each person has “my truth.” Critical theory imposed the definitive and final answer to social and political questions in terms of Marx’s class conflict theory, with the creative modification of racial, gender, and sexuality classes being the actors in oppression and victimhood. Feminists disposed of Western culture and civilization as the patriarchal work of “dead white men.” Goodbye, Homer and Shakespeare and all of Western literature, Bach and Beethoven and all of Western music (except Clara Schumann), Rembrandt and Renoir and all of Western painting (except, of course, Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt).

Race activists have rejected the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution as the work of “slave owners,” and the entire country as “systemically racist.” Race-baiters at The New York Times, once a serious newspaper, declared that America was from its foundation about slavery and has been about anti-black racism ever since, and never about anything else. America has been duly canceled. Canada, weak on slavery, is deemed strong on “colonialism” and utterly worthless. Liberal arts education was, as we have now been informed, always a lie in aid of patriarchal and white supremacist oppression.

With neo-Marxist “social justice” ideology having answered all important questions, not only is further inquiry redundant, but also any alternative point of view, criticism, or objection is forbidden as “white male supremacism” and “violence” against “marginalized, racialized, and underserved populations,” who “feel unsafe” and traumatized if they hear opinions that do not support “social justice” ideology. Thus, freedom of speech and academic freedom are totally canceled. Diversity of thought and opinion is deemed reactionary, fascist, Nazi, and evil.

Education today, in universities and in schools under the guidance of universities, is all about overthrowing the patriarchy and white supremacism and replacing males with females, and whites with people of color, preferably lesbians and transsexuals of color. There’s no longer a need to ask all of those obscure liberal arts questions, for we now have all of the virtuous answers. We know how society was constituted as oppressive, and how it will be reconstituted as virtuous. We know who is worth listening to and emulating—females and people of color—and who must be marginalized—males and whites.

This replacement, apparent for example in the demography of all universities, has been conducted under the slogan “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” which means fewer men and whites (with the exception of the preferred illegal aliens), and more females and people of color. Today, it’s males and whites who are “underrepresented,” which is exactly what was hoped for by the “woke.”

What’s the Choice?

With liberal arts education no longer available in “woke” anti-male and anti-white universities, what options are available for high school graduates?

Higher education has for decades been seen in North America as the path to economic and social success. Parents have sacrificed to send their children to college and university. Even if they know how corrupt higher education has become, they wouldn’t be willing to deprive their offspring of the advantages alleged to follow from graduation.

So, for the, say, 90 percent of parents who are not Marxists, radical feminists, anti-white racists, and science deniers, what can they do for their children?

Above all, don’t let your children enroll in “studies” courses—feminist, black, ethnic, “Latinx,” queer, trans, and whatever new “victim” they come up with next. Unless you want your children to learn race and gender hatred, hatred of their country, and hatred of Western civilization, and want them to have as their occupational destiny fast food outlets and coffee houses, avoid these “woke” programs.

In the social sciences, anthropology, sociology, and political science used to be serious academic subjects but are now devoted to lies, such as that blacks are at more risk of death from police rather than from the black criminals who in reality take most of their lives, that statistical disparities are proof of discrimination rather than differential preferences and capabilities, and that men can become women and women can become men.

The humanities are much the same and should be avoided. Don’t imagine that English literature is taught in English departments anymore. They would not sink to teaching “dead white men.” English departments are now all “woke” cultural studies, which probably explains why enrollment has plummeted. History has now become “people’s” history, with special emphasis on the “oppressed.” Its enrollment has also plummeted. Even language programs are no longer about teaching language but about “social justice.” Avoid at all costs the social sciences and humanities.

It may be hard to believe, but education and social work are more radical. Education faculties are dedicated to bringing race and gender hatred into the schools.

Only the hard sciences, engineering, and mathematics have maintained some academic content, although the departments themselves struggle with the “diversity, equity, and inclusion” mandates imposed on them. So, STEM would be the only programs that would be worthwhile for your children. Oh, but not biology, which has been canceled by transgender activists and their enablers throughout society, and who will cancel your children should they believe in biology.

There’s another option (thank you, David Leis): higher education in technical fields, at polytechnic institutions such as British Columbia Institute of Technology in Vancouver, Manitoba Institute of Trades and Technology, Algonquin College in Ottawa, and Dawson College in Montreal. In the United States, the reputation of the multitude of polytechnic universities is set by the California Institute of Technology and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Wisdom, once sought in the liberal arts, must now be sought elsewhere."

Philip Carl Salzman is professor emeritus of anthropology at McGill University, senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, fellow at the Middle East Forum, and president of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

The Destructive "CHURCH OF WOKE" Fully Exposed



 The "CHURCH OF WOKE" is based on SELF-HATING COWARDICE. "Psychotic," (Greek for "thought-killing") habitual HYPOCRITES hate them selves first, for having already been weak and Submitted to external threats in the past - they feel ashamed and the pain of guilt and remorseful fear, but have no way to reverse time to correct their cowardice. So they try to get revenge on 'The Universe' by lying and tempting and otherwise forcing other people to Submit to fear, too ("misery loves company") and in only that way can they then hope to console them selves by pretending that their past Submission was always really only "perfectly natural" (i.e: "inevitable" forces, and so, not ever their fault) "Because you all" (i.e: everyone else) always did and still do it, too! Whee!"

So: Cowardly hypocrites hate brave honesty! They are jealous of those bravely honest and self-reliant people's free-will choices to refuse to Submit, because those peoples' existence proves the hypocrites' own past decisions to Submit were NOT inevitable but cowardly CHOICES. And THAT realization rekindles all their previous painful guilty fears about their own cowardly selves! The existence of bravely honest people, whom the hypocrites KNOW ARE better than them, cannot be tolerated as long as they hope to maintain their own default go-to baseline set-points of hypocrisy, where no matter what the real-world cause-and-effect, attack-vs-defense objective sequential facts may be, they hold that they are always equally helpless but righteously heroic fellow victims, who are always entitled to the right to everyone else's pity and acclaim, without having any responsibility to earn or prove it; while everyone who dares to reject that lie, must be their wrongfully villainous oppressors, entitled to no right to defend them selves from the hypocrites' slanders, but having only the responsibility to become and remain their slave for their "hateful" lack of pity and acclaim!

So, this is how the POLITICS AND RELIGION OF "WOKE" ARE SUSTAINED:

Libertine "liberal" criminals are all hypocrites - paranoid masochists who pretend they don't believe in free-will choice, and therefore also not in criminal intent, criminality, crimes, or criminals.

Here's how ALL the so-called "soft" sciences aka "humanities" (anthropology, psychology, sociology, and even Law or criminology) really work: They all started off by examining the various symptoms and EFFECTS of human behavior, thinking, group-thinking behavior, and of criminal free-will CHOICES, respectively, but then self-invalidated by looking for hidden mysterious predestined and predetermined inevitable force "CAUSES" of it all, which degraded them all into only one criminal, excuse-making alibi topic:

"VICTIMOLOGY!"

So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles:

*Law-abiding Conservatives: "Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!"*

*Criminal libertines: "But what CAUSED that choice? There's always a cause!"*

Their implication, like the "That tree hit my car!" excuse, is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we're always all "victims."

In short: they went from studying HOW people CHOOSE to act, to focusing on WHY (ruling out free will choice entirely)!

That's why they want to legalize all crimes, defund the police, and empty all the prisons.

And therefore also, hadn't you heard?!

Being constructively angry at ("hateful" towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while uselessly pitying ("tolerating") them all as "equally-helpless fellow victims," is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, criminals must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking - through an emotional, sub-conscious "narrative" - so much so, that the only advice we hear from "our" hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

"Anyone who doesn't automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!"

Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a "hateful" crime itself!

Beyond that, this is the RELIGION OF "WOKE:"

"Everyone must be "WOKE" up to the 'obvious fact' that everything that ever goes wrong is always the fault of Straight White Males - Every Single Time! Because obviously, they are in general larger, stronger, faster and smarter (more competitively evolved to succeed) than non-straight gays, non-White People Of Color, and non-male WXMXN, so every time the latter fails at anything it can't be simply because they are generally smaller, weaker, slower and dumber than the former, but because the latter must have been somehow so fearful of their inferiors that they decided to take time out from their busy days of literally minding their own businesses to dream up ever-new creative ways to "oppress" (confuse) them with, such as "logic," "facts," "science," and "truth!" due to their natural "homophobic," "racist," "sexism," respectively! So combating this obviously inherent, "systemically engineered" social injustice with "woke" progressivism, is the duty of all shallow-thinking pre-judiced and biased anti-White bigots! Whee!" 

Or something like that.

But of course it's all "projection," because "Those that can't do, teach (others how to help them slander extort and enslave those who CAN do")! It's Takers vs Makers!

And, while no amount of tax money thrown, or government force imposed, will ever be able to make the races or sexes "equal," the very act of pretending to have to try to do so will lucratively enrich countless generations of politicians and their backers (and maybe even some of their followers!) forever, because their motto always was, still is, and always will be: "There's No Money In Solutions, so: Please Give Generously - AGAIN!"

;-)

Bottom line: "Wokeness" requires you wallow in your victimhood.
If you refuse to label yourself a victim, you are their enemy.

BUT MEANWHILE, BACK HERE IN REALITY ...

Whites, being superior and knowing it (guilty White liberals included) can't play the victim; at most, they can only pretend to champion the non-Whites' extortion attempts in order to personally treasonously gain power over their fellow Whites.

Unfortunately for the non-traitor, "illiberal" rest of us, to even defend our selves against these extortionists, makes us seem like nasty bullies picking on our mentally-crippled inferiors.

The enemy relies on the same old paranoid masochist claims routinely used by criminal hypocrites all the time:

"Since only you COULD have oppressed us, (by dint of your implied but never dared-to-be-spoken-aloud obvious mental superiority over us) and we say we feel oppressed, therefore you DID oppress us and so you also now owe us reparations for having oppressed us - CAPISCE?"

Well, the only valid, brutally truthful response MUST now be:

"NO. You're failures because, relatively, you suck! You're smaller weaker slower and less savvy than we are, which is the only reason we so-often succeed while you usually fail!"

So, while telling that simple truth would indeed only serve to further enrage our inferiors, while making us look very un-sympathetically like arrogant bullies who deserve to get further extorted anyways, there still has to be a limit, before these piecemeal niggling extortion attempts become full-blown and organized, global slavery directed against us all!


See also:


https://summit.news/2021/05/05/roger-daltrey-the-woke-generation-is-creating-a-miserable-world/


https://sheikyermami.com/2021/05/the-coming-race-war-2/


https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1236678427904524288