Muslims Demand Right to Preach in Public Schools: Canada
Student Islamists are mounting a coordinated campaign to expand Muslim religious services in the high schools of Canada’s sixth largest city.
So far, authorities are proving sympathetic, suspending a new policy meant to regulate student sermons.
“The school board should not be policing religion,” campaign leader Shahmir Durrani told one of two November board meetings in Mississauga, Ontario, that heard from imams, parents, high school students and university leaders of the Muslim Students Association (MSA), an organization founded for universities students by members of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1963.
“Many students are feeling stigmatized because of this.”
Talk of prayers and sermons might come as a surprise to those unaware of how widespread Muslim religious activity has become in some Canadian school jurisdictions, and how far the fundamentalist MSA has penetrated the public education system.
The changes started a decade ago, when the Ontario provincial government encouraged accommodation of an individual’s religious practice at workplaces and schools.
At first, Muslim students were denied Friday congregational prayers and were told they could only pray only as individuals.
Five years ago, however, the Toronto Sun reported that 800 students at Toronto’s Valley Park Middle School were converting the school’s cafeteria into a temporary mosque every Friday during class hours, with boys praying in front, girls praying behind them separated by a barrier and menstruating girls obliged to sit at the very back to observe the service but not participate.
Toronto school trustees upheld the practice, and since then, Friday congregational prayers have been spreading though the public school system ever since.
One of Canada’s highest Muslim concentrations is in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada’s sixth city located at Toronto’s western border. Of the city’s 19 high schools, 17 have a Muslim Students Association (MSA).
The list of 17 includes Meadowvale Secondary, which temporarily banned its MSA 10 years ago after two alumni were caught co-leading a terrorist cell known as the Toronto 18, with plans to blow up buildings in downtown Toronto. A third cell member had led the school’s Friday prayers.
The MSAs promote Friday prayers in schools, but how many Mississauga elementary, middle, and high schools are holding services is not publicly known. “We don’t track school-by-school,” Peel District School Board spokesperson Brian Woodland said.
At some point — Woodland would not give details — staff supervisors reported problems with student sermons.
On Sept. 20, the school board ruled that students could not deliver their own sermons, but must choose from a bank of approved sermons written by a committee of six local imams. Themes were restricted to the board’s stated values of caring, cooperation, honesty, inclusiveness, respect and responsibility.
The students pushed back. In a well organized campaign, three levels of activists publicly petitioned school trustees to scrap mandatory use of approved sermons. They also demanded that students be allowed to pray together every day, not just on Fridays.
“Eliminate the prohibition of allowing students to pray together outside of Jummah [Friday] prayers if it is convenient [to the students],” said campaign leader Durrani, a University of Toronto at Mississauga student and activist for the Canadian Muslim Youth Federation.
“Policing this one group [Muslims] based on prejudice and control… could have serious psychological impacts,” said Maleeha Baig, a student at the same university and coordinator for the High School Muslim Student Associations, a subsidiary of the youth federation.
“This policy… sets out to prohibit the discussion of Islamic beliefs in sermons,” said Hamza Aziz, MSA president at John Fraser Secondary School and part of the third organizational rung. Aziz was one of 16 MSA executive members from five Mississauga high schools who addressed the school board at a recent meeting.
Bilal Sheikh, a self-described “active member of the Muslim community” — and who with several other men refused to stand for the national anthem — accused the board of “systemizing Islamophobia.” (See video below.)
In response, school trustees immediately suspended mandatory use of the approved sermons. As an interim measure, they ruled that students can submit their own sermons to a principal for approval on the Monday before the Friday prayer service. A revised permanent policy is to be announced in the coming weeks, board chair Janet McDougald said.
Although the school trustees have allowed the prayers — which are already problematic due to their segregation rules (and certainly embarrassingly stigmatizing to girls who are menstruating) — the involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked MSA organizations, which are known promote Islamist ideology, is even more than troubling.
Sitting For “O Canada” from John Goddard on Vimeo. (YouTube removed from its site the same video of this event.)
There is a reason why we say that Islam is not the religion of peace when young women are being slaughtered in the name of it.
Sadly, another young girl was killed in an honor killing and her killers were wandering free.
Thankfully, not anymore.
Here is more from Opposing Views:
Thirteen people have been apprehended in Pakistan for reportedly participating in the vicious honor killing of a 16-year-old girl.
The teenager was burned alive on April 29 in the village of Donga Gali, about 30 miles northeast of Pakistan’s capital city, Islamabad, according to Reuters. A group of 15 members of a local tribal council, called a jirga, allegedly participated in the killing in retaliation for the girl’s role in helping a couple from the nearby village of Makol elope.
The victim, only known as Ambreen, was taken from her home to an abandoned home where she was drugged and placed unconscious in the backseat of a parked van. Her hands were reportedly tied to the seats to prevent escape before the vehicle was doused in gasoline and set ablaze.
The teen’s burned body was found by authorities last week. District police arrested 13 of the 15 individuals involved in the killing May 5.
The 13 people arrested, which include the victim’s mother and brother, will be tried in an Anti-Terrorism Court.
Two weeks ago, Ambreen assisted a local couple elope and leave Makol for the Pakistani city of Abottabad. When the members of the jirga realized the couple was missing, they called a 6-hour meeting April 28, during which they agreed to kill the girl as punishment for damaging the village’s reputation.
Because it's obviously better to have a reputation for burning children to death, than one for allowing unsanctioned marriages.
These Are The Players Who Must Be Charged In Deep State Coup On The President
(Tea Party PAC) – When the news broke over the weekend that the
675-day witch hunt into the President’s mythical collusion with Russia
during the 2016 election was finally at an end with absolutely no
evidence of any collusion, conspiracy, or coordination, there could only
be so much celebration.
Because now we knew for certain that the entire thing had been a
farce, and that those who thought up the whole scheme were still walking
free.
Over the course of the Russia investigation, key evidence began to
arise that the plot was hatched as a political attack on a man the
Democrats’ couldn’t bear to see in the White House, and the rest is
history.
A very dark black mark on our history.
The only way to rectify this now is to see the following individuals held accountable for their crimes: John Brennan
Obama’s former CIA director initiated the whole plan. His hands are
filthy in all this and his constant attacks on the President serve to
highlight the active role he played in trying to have the President
removed from office. t. James Comey
Comey will not only go down as the worst FBI director in the history
of the agency, he also signed the FISA warrants that were used to spy on
Trump and his campaign. Andrew McCabe
McCabe was the inside man on the FBI working towards the coup of the President. James Clapper
Clapper blatantly lied in the course of promoting the Trump-Russia
myth, which he’d had practice at after pushing the claims of Iraqi WMDs. Sally Yates
Yates was a key part of the FISA application and lied to Congress about General Flynn’s supposed crimes.
Peter Strzok
Dirty FBI agent Strozk and his ex-lover Lisa Page discussed the
“insurance plan” they had on Trump, whom they hated, and just so
happened to be the lead agent on both Hillary’s email case and the
beginning of the Trump-Russia campaign. Lisa Page
Page betrayed in her text messages and emails that she was following
directions to both make sure Clinton wasn’t indicted and that Trump was
instead investigated and slandered. Loretta Lynch
The infamous Phoenix tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton just days
before Clinton was let off the hook for her obvious crimes makes no
secret of Lynch’s corruption and the dirty role she played in the
cover-up. James Baker
Baker was the figure who handed over the phony Steele dossier to
BuzzFeed to disseminate into the mainstream media and was the bagman to
the FISA warrants that were based on the bunk dossier. Christopher Steele
Steele is the ex-British asset who paid his buddies in Russia to line
his Clinton-funded dossier with fake Russian gossip and who wrote the
document which the entire conspiracy centers around. Glenn Simpson
Simpson is the co-founder of GPS, the opposition research firm that
served as the conduit for the DNC and Clinton campaign to craft the
slanderous lies against the President. Hillary Clinton
The Trump-Russia narrative began in her campaign, and she worked hard
to perpetuate it after her stunning defeat in 2016. She openly blamed
the Russians on more than one occasion for her loss.
Of course, you already know about her many crimes, which the
Trump-Russia campaign also served as a cover-up for and distraction
from. Nellie and Bruce Ohr
Nellie worked as a double agent for both Brennan at the CIA and
Fusion GPS to craft the phony dossier. Bruce was a top DOJ official who
promoted it to the FBI and other outlets. John McCain
McCain was so vehemently opposed to Trump that he and his staff also helped promote the fake dossier. Susan Rice
Rice was privy to this entire dirty operation. Samantha Powers
Obama’s UN Ambassador played a key role in the operation, politicizing intelligence and unmasking many American citizens. Ben Rhodes
The novelist-turned-top White House Adviser also played a key role in the whole deal.
And finally, we come to… Barack Obama
Obama was well aware of the whole operation and likely even orchestrated it, according to the Lisa Page emails and testimony.
The Department of Justice needs to launch a proper investigation into all these crooks forthwith. It can’t come soon enough.
The dossier that follows is based
upon a report released on Oct. 1, 1996 by EIR's bureau in Wiesbaden,
Germany, titled "A Profile of Mega-Speculator George Soros." Research
was contributed by Mark Burdman, Elisabeth Hellenbroich, Paolo Raimondi,
and Scott Thompson.
Time magazine has characterized financier George Soros
as a "modern-day Robin Hood," who robs from the rich to give to the
poor countries of eastern Europe and Russia. It claimed that Soros makes
huge financial gains by speculating against western central banks, in
order to use his profits to help the emerging post-communist economies
of eastern Europe and former Soviet Union, to assist them to create what
he calls an "Open Society."
The Time statement is entirely accurate in the first part, and entirely
inaccurate in the second. He robs from rich western countries, and uses
his profits to rob even more savagely from the East, under the cloak of
"philanthropy."
His goal is to loot wherever and however he can. Soros has been called the master manipulator of "hit-and-run capitalism."
As we shall see, what Soros means by "open," is a society that allows
him and his financial predator friends to loot the resources and
precious assets of former Warsaw Pact economies. By bringing people like
Jeffrey Sachs or Sweden's Anders Aslund and their economic shock
therapy into these economies, Soros lays the groundwork for buying up
the assets of whole regions of the world at dirt-cheap prices.
The man who broke the Bank of England?
An examination of Soros's secretive financial network is vital to
understand the true dimension of the "Soros problem" in eastern Europe
and other nations.
Following the crisis of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism of
September 1992, when the Bank of England was forced to abandon efforts
to stabilize the pound sterling, a little-known financial figure emerged
from the shadows, to boast that he had personally made over $1 billion
in speculation against the British pound.
The speculator was the Hungarian-born George Soros, who spent the war in
Hungary under false papers working for the Nazi government, identifying
and expropriating the property of wealthy fellow Jews. Soros left
Hungary after the war, and established American citizenship after some
years in London. Today, Soros is based in New York, but that tells
little, if anything, of who and what he is.
Following his impressive claims to possession of a "Midas touch," Soros
has let his name be publicly used in a blatant attempt to influence
world financial markets — an out-of-character act for most financial
investors, who prefer to take advantage of situations not yet discovered
by rivals, and keep them secret. Soros the financier is as much a
political animal, as a financial speculator.
Soros proclaimed in March 1993, with great publicity, that the price of
gold was about to rise sharply; he said that he had just gotten "inside
information" that China was about to buy huge sums of gold for its
booming economy.
Soros was able to trigger a rush into buying gold, which caused prices
to rise more than 20% over four months, to the highest level since 1991.
Typically for Soros, once the fools rushed in to push prices higher,
Soros and his friend Sir James Goldsmith secretly began selling their
gold at a huge profit.
Then, in early June 1993, Soros proclaimed his intent to force a
sell-off in German government bonds in favor of the French, in an open
letter to London Times Financial Editor Anatole Kaletsky, in which Soros
proclaimed, "Down with the D-Mark!"
Soros has at various times attacked the currencies of Thailand,
Malaysia, Indonesia, and Mexico, coming into newly opened financial
markets which have little experience with foreign investors, let alone
ones with large funds like Soros.
Soros begins buying stocks or bonds in the local market, leading others
to naively suppose that he knows something they do not. As with gold,
when the smaller investors begin to follow Soros, driving prices of
stocks or whatever higher, Soros begins to sell to the eager new buyers,
cashing in his 40% or 100% profits, then exiting the market, and often,
the entire country, to seek another target for his speculation.
This technique gave rise to the term "hit and run." What Soros always
leaves behind, is a collapsed local market and financial ruin of
national investors.
The secret of the Quantum Fund NV
Soros is the visible side of a vast
and nasty secret network of private financial interests, controlled by
the leading aristocratic and royal families of Europe, centered in the
British House of Windsor. This network, called by its members the Club
of Isles, was built upon the wreckage of the British Empire after World
War II.
Rather than use the powers of the state to achieve their geopolitical
goals, a secret cross-linked holding of private financial interests,
tied to the old aristocratic oligarchy of western Europe, was developed.
It was in many ways modeled on the 17th-century British and Dutch East India Companies. The heart of this Club of the Isles is the financial center of the old British Empire, the City of London. Soros is one of what in medieval days were called Hofjuden, the "Court Jews," who were deployed by the aristocratic families.
The most important of such "Jews who are not Jews," are the Rothschilds, who launched Soros's career. They are members of the Club of the Isles and retainers of the British royal family. This has been true since Amschel Rothschild sold the British Hessian troops to fight against George Washington during the American Revolution.
Soros is American only in his passport. He is a global financial operator,
who happens to be in New York, simply because "that's where the money
is," as the bank robber Willy Sutton once quipped, when asked why he
always robbed banks.
Soros speculates in world financial markets through his offshore
company, Quantum Fund NV, a private investment fund, or "hedge fund."
His hedge fund reportedly manages some $11-14 billion of funds on behalf
of its clients, or investors — one of the most prominent of whom is,
according to Soros, Britain's Queen Elizabeth, [one of] the wealthiest person[s] in Europe.
The Quantum Fund is registered in the tax haven of the Netherlands
Antilles, in the Caribbean. This is to avoid paying taxes, as well as to
hide the true nature of his investors and what he does with their
money.
Legal headquarters moved to tax heaven Curacao
In order to avoid U.S. government supervision of his financial
activities, something normal U.S.-based investment funds must by law
agree to in order to operate, Soros moved his legal headquarters to the
Caribbean tax haven of Curacao.
The Netherlands Antilles has repeatedly been cited by the Task Force on
Money Laundering of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) as one of the world's most important centers for
laundering illegal proceeds of the Latin American cocaine and other drug
traffic. It is a possession of the Netherlands.
Soros has taken care that the none of the 99 individual investors who
participate in his various funds is an American national. By U.S.
securities law, a hedge fund is limited to no more than 99 highly
wealthy individuals, so-called "sophisticated investors." By structuring
his investment company as an offshore hedge fund, Soros avoids public
scrutiny.
Soros himself is not even on the board of Quantum Fund. Instead, for
legal reasons, he serves the Quantum Fund as official "investment
adviser," through another company, Soros Fund Management, of New York
City. If any demand were to be made of Soros to reveal the details of
Quantum Fund's operations, he is able to claim he is "merely its
investment adviser."
Any competent police investigator looking at the complex legal structure
of Soros's businesses would conclude that there is prima facie evidence
of either vast money laundering of illicit funds, or massive illegal
tax evasion. Both may be true.
To make it impossible for U.S. tax authorities or other officials to
look into the financial dealings of his web of businesses, the board of
directors of Quantum Fund NV also includes no American citizens. His
directors are Swiss, Italian, and British financiers.
George Soros is part of a tightly knit financial mafia — "mafia," in the sense of a closed masonic-like fraternity of families
pursuing common aims. Anyone who dares to criticize Soros or any of his
associates, is immediately hit with the charge of being "anti-Semitic" — a criticism which often silences or intimidates genuine critics of Soros's unscrupulous operations.
The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith considers it a top priority
to "protect" Soros from the charges of "anti-Semites" in Hungary and
elsewhere in Central Europe, according to ADL National Director Abraham
Foxman. The ADL's record of service to the British oligarchy has been
amply documented by EIR (e.g. The Ugly Truth About the Anti-Defamation
League [Washington, D.C., Executive Intelligence Review: 1992]).
According to knowledgeable U.S. and European investigators, Soros's
circle includes indicted metals and commodity speculator and fugitive
Marc Rich of Zug, Switzerland and Tel Aviv; secretive Israeli arms and
commodity dealer Shaul Eisenberg, and "Dirty Rafi" Eytan, both linked to
the financial side of the Israeli Mossad; and, the family of Jacob Lord Rothschild.
Understandably, Soros and the Rothschild interests prefer to keep their connection hidden far from public view, so as to obscure the well-connected friends Soros enjoys in the City of London, the British Foreign Office, Israel, and the U.S. financial establishment.
The myth, therefore, has been created, that Soros is a lone financial
investment "genius" who, through his sheer personal brilliance in
detecting shifts in markets, has become one of the world's most
successful speculators. According to those who have done business with
him, Soros never makes a major investment move without sensitive insider information.
On the board of directors of Soros's Quantum Fund N.V. is Richard
Katz, a Rothschild man who is also on the board of the London N.M.
Rothschild and Sons merchant bank, and the head of Rothschild Italia
S.p.A. of Milan.
Another Rothschild family link to Soros's Quantum Fund is Quantum
board member Nils O. Taube, the partner of the London investment group
St. James Place Capital, whose major partner is Lord Rothschild.
London Times columnist Lord William Rees-Mogg is also on the board of Rothschild's St. James Place Capital.
A frequent business partner of Soros in various speculative deals,
including in the 1993 gold manipulation, although not on the Quantum
Fund directly, is the Anglo-French speculator Sir James Goldsmith, a cousin of the Rothschild family.
From the very first days when Soros created his own investment fund in
1969, he owed his success to his relation to the Rothschild family
banking network. Soros worked in New York in the 1960s for a small private bank close to the Rothschilds,
Arnhold & S. Bleichroeder, Inc., a banking family which represented
Rothschild interests in Germany during Bismarck's time.
To this day, A. & S. Bleichroeder, Inc. remains the Principal
Custodian, along with Citibank, of funds of Soros's Quantum Fund. George
C. Karlweiss, of Edmond de Rothschild's
Switzerland-based Banque Privee SA in Lugano, as well as of the
scandal-tainted Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich, gave Soros financial
backing. Karlweiss provided some of the vital initial capital and
investors for Soros's Quantum Fund.
Union Banque Privee and the 'Swiss connection'
Another member of the board of Soros's Quantum Fund is the head of one
of the most controversial Swiss private banks, Edgar de Picciotto, who
has been called "one of the cleverest bankers in Geneva" — and is one of
the most scandal-tainted.
De Picciotto, from an old Portuguese Jewish trading family, who was born
in Lebanon, is head of the Geneva private bank CBI-TDB Union Bancaire
Privee, a major player in the gold and offshore hedge funds business.
Hedge funds have been identified by international police agencies as the
fastest-growing outlet for illegal money laundering today.
De Picciotto is a longtime friend and business associate of banker
Edmond Safra, also born in Lebanon, whose family came from Aleppo,
Syria, and who now controls the Republic Bank of New York. Republic Bank
has been identified in U.S. investigations into Russian organized
crime, as the bank involved in transferring billions of U.S. Federal
Reserve notes from New York to organized crime-controlled Moscow banks,
on behalf of Russian organized crime figures.
Safra is under investigation by U.S. and Swiss authorities for
laundering Turkish and Columbian drug money. In 1990, Safra's Trade
Development Bank (TDB) of Geneva was merged with de Picciotto's CBI to
create the CBI-TDB Union Banque Privee. The details of the merger are
shrouded in secrecy to this day.
As part of the deal, de Picciotto became a board member of American
Express Bank (Switzerland) SA of Geneva, and two American Express Bank
of New York executives sit on the board of de Picciotto's Union Banque
Privee.
Safra had sold his Trade Development Bank to American Express, Inc. in
the 1980s. Henry Kissinger sits on the board of American Express, Inc.,
which has repeatedly been implicated in international money-laundering
scandals.
De Picciotto's start as a Geneva banker came from Nicholas Baring of the
London Barings Bank, who tapped de Picciotto to run the bank's secret
Swiss bank business. Barings has for centuries been private banker to
the British royal family, and since the bank's collapse in March 1995,
has been overhauled by the Dutch ING Bank, which is reported to be a
major money-laundering institution.
De Picciotto is also a longtime business partner of Venetian businessman
Carlo De Benedetti, who recently was forced to resign as head of
Olivetti Corp. Both persons sit on the board of the Societe Financiere
de Geneve investment holding company in Geneva. De Benedetti is under
investigation in Italy for suspicion of triggering the collapse of
Italy's Banco Ambrosiano in the early 1980s.
The head of that bank, Roberto Calvi, was later found hanging from the
London Blackfriar's Bridge, in what police believe was a masonic ritual
murder.
De Picciotto and his Union Banque Privee have been implicated in
numerous drug and illegal money-laundering operations. In November 1994,
U.S. federal agents arrested a senior official of de Picciotto's Geneva
bank, Jean-Jacques Handali, along with two other UBP officials, on
charges of leading a multimillion-dollar drug-money-laundering ring.
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, Handali and Union
Banque Privee were the "Swiss connection" in an international
drug-money-laundering ring tied to Colombian and Turkish cocaine and
heroin organizations.
A close business and political associate of de Picciotto is a mysterious
arm dealer, Helmut Raiser, who is linked in business dealings with
reputed Russian organized crime kingpin Grigori Luchansky, who controls
the Russian and Swiss holding company Nordex Group.
Another director of Soros's Quantum Fund is Isodoro Albertini, owner of
the Milan stock brokerage firm Albertini and Co. Beat Notz of the Geneva
Banque Worms is another private banker on the board of Soros's Quantum
Fund, as is Alberto Foglia, who is chief of the Lugano, Switzerland
Banca del Ceresio.
Lugano, just across the Swiss border from Milan, is notorious as the
financial secret bank haven for Italian organized crime families,
including the heroin mafia behind the 1980s "Pizza Connection" case. The
Banca del Ceresio has been one of the secret Swiss banks identified in
the recent Italian political corruption scandals as the repository of
bribe funds of several Italian politicians now in prison.
The sponsorship of the Rothschilds
Soros's relation to the Rothschild finance circle represents no ordinary or casual banking connection.
It goes a long way to explain the extraordinary success of a mere
private speculator, and Soros's uncanny ability to "gamble right" so
many times in such high-risk markets. Soros has access to the "insider track" in some of the most important government and private channels in the world.
Since World War II, the Rothschild family, at the heart of the financial apparatus of the Club of the Isles,
has gone to great lengths to create a public myth about its own
insignificance. The family has spent significant sums cultivating a
public image as a family of wealthy, but quiet, "gentlemen," some of
whom prefer to cultivate fine French wines, some of whom are devoted to
charity.
But behind their public facade of a family donating money for projects
such as planting trees in the deserts of Israel, N.M. Rothschild of
London is at the center of various intelligence operations, and more
than once has been linked to the more unsavory elements of international
organized crime.
The family prefers to keep such links at arm's length, and away from its
London headquarters, via its lesser-known outposts such as their Zurich
Rothschild Bank AG and Rothschild Italia of Milan, the bank of Soros
partner Richard Katz.
N.M. Rothschild is considered by City of London
sources to be one of the most influential parts of the British
intelligence establishment, tied to the Thatcher "free market" wing of
the Tory Party.
Rothschild and Sons made huge sums managing for Thatcher the
privatization of billions of dollars of British state industry holdings
during the 1980s, and today, for John Major's government.
Rothschilds is also at the very heart of the world gold trade, being the
bank at which twice daily the London Gold Fix is struck by a group of
the five most influential gold trade banks. Gold constitutes a major
part of the economy of drug dealings globally.
N.M. Rothschild and Sons is also implicated in some of the filthiest
drugs-for-weapons secret intelligence operations. Because it is
connected to the highest levels of the British intelligence
establishment, Rothschilds managed to evade any prominent mention of its
complicity in one of the more sordid black covert intelligence
networks, that of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).
On June 8, 1993 the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives'
Committee on Banking, Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Tex.), made a speech
charging that the U.S. government, under the previous Bush and Reagan
administrations, had systematically refused to prosecute the BCCI, and
that the Department of Justice had repeatedly refused to cooperate with
Congressional investigations of both the BCCI scandal and what Gonzalez
claims is the closely related scandal of the Atlanta, Georgia Banca
Nationale del Lavoro, which was alleged to have secured billions in
loans from the Bush administration to Saddam Hussein, just prior to the Gulf War of 1990-91.
Gonzalez charged that the Bush administration had "a Justice Department
that I say, and I repeat, has been the most corrupt, most unbelievably
corrupt justice system that I have seen in the 32 years I have been in
the Congress."
The BCCI violated countless laws, including laundering drug money,
financing illegal arms traffic, and falsifying bank records. In July
1991, New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau announced a grand
jury indictment against BCCI, charging it with having committed "the
largest bank fraud in world financial history. BCCI operated as a
corrupt criminal organization throughout its entire 19-year history."
The BCCI had links directly into the Bush White House. Saudi Sheik Kamal
Adham, a BCCI director and former head of Saudi Arabian intelligence
when George Bush was head of the CIA, was one of the BCCI shareholders
indicted in the United States.
Days after his indictment, former top Bush White House aide Edward
Rogers went to Saudi Arabia as a private citizen to sign a contract to
represent Sheikh Adham in the United States.
But, what has never been identified in a single major Western press
investigation, was that the Rothschild group was at the heart of the
vast illegal web of BCCI.
The key figure was Dr. Alfred Hartmann, the managing director of the
BCCI Swiss subsidiary, Banque de Commerce et de Placement SA; at the
same time, he ran the Zurich Rothschild Bank AG, and sat in London as a
member of the board of N.M. Rothschild and Sons, Hartmann was also a
business partner of Helmut Raiser, friend of de Picciotto, and linked to
Nordex.
Hartmann was also chairman of the Swiss affiliate of the Italian BNL
bank, which was implicated in the Bush administration illegal transfers
to Iraq prior to the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Atlanta branch
of BNL, with the knowledge of George Bush when he was vice president,
conduited funds to Helmut Raiser's Zug, Switzerland company, Consen,
for development of the CondorII missile program by Iraq, Egypt, and
Argentina, during the Iran-Iraq War.
Hartmann was vice-chairman of another secretive private Geneva bank, the
Bank of NY-Inter-Maritime Bank, a bank whose chairman, Bruce Rappaport,
was one of the illegal financial conduits for Col. Oliver North's
Contra drugs-for-weapons network during the late 1980. North also used
the BCCI as one of his preferred banks to hide his illegal funds.
Rich, Reichmann, and Soros's Israeli links
According to reports of former U.S. State Department intelligence
officers familiar with the Soros case, Soros's Quantum Fund amassed a
war chest of well over $10 billion, with the help of a powerful group of
"silent" investors who let Soros deploy the capital to demolish
European monetary stability in September 1992.
Among Soros's silent investors, these sources say, are the fugitive
metals and oil trader Marc Rich, based in Zug, Switzerland; and Shaul
Eisenberg, a decades-long member of Israeli Mossad intelligence, who
functions as a major arms merchant throughout Asia and the Near East.
Eisenberg was recently banned from doing business in Uzbekistan, where
he had been accused by the government of massive fraud and corruption. A
third Soros partner is Israel's "Dirty Rafi" Eytan, who served in
London previously as Mossad liaison to British intelligence.
Rich was one of the most active western traders in oil, aluminum, and
other commodities in the Soviet Union and Russia between 1989 and 1993.
This, not coincidentally, is just the period when Grigori Luchansky's
Nordex Group became a multibillion-dollar company selling Russian oil,
aluminum, and other commodities.
Canadian real estate entrepreneur Paul Reichmann, formerly of Olympia
and York notoriety, a Hungarian-born Jew like Soros, is a business
partner in Soros's Quantum Realty, a $525-million real estate investment
fund.
The Reichmann tie links Soros as well with Henry Kissinger
and former Tory Foreign Minister Lord Carrington (who is also a member
of Kissinger Associates, Inc. of New York). Reichmann sits with both
Kissinger and Carrington on the board of the influential
British-Canadian publishing group, Hollinger, Inc.
Hollinger owns a large number of newspapers in Canada and the United
States, the London Daily Telegraph, and the largest English-language
daily in Israel, the Jerusalem Post. Hollinger has been attacking
President Clinton and the Middle East peace process ever since Clinton's
election in November 1992.
Soros and geopolitics
Soros is little more than one of several significant vehicles for economic and financial warfare by the Club of the Isles
faction. Because his affiliations to these interests have not
previously been spotlighted, he serves extremely useful functions for
the oligarchy, as in 1992 and 1993, when he launched his attack on the
European Rate Mechanism.
Although Soros's speculation played a role in finally taking the British
pound out of the ERM currency group entirely, it would be a mistake to
view that action as "anti-British." Soros went for the first time to
London, where he studied under Karl Popper and Friedrich von Hayek at
the London School of Economics.
Soros's business ties to Sir James Goldsmith and Lord Rothschild place
him in the inner circles of the Thatcher wing of the British
establishment.
By helping the "anti-Europe" Thatcherites pull Britain out of the ERM in
September 1992 (and making more than $1 billion in the process at
British taxpayer expense), Soros helped the long-term goal of the
Thatcherites in weakening continental Europe's economic stability.
Since 1904, it has been British geopolitical strategy to prevent by all
means any successful economic linkage between western continental
European economies, especially that of Germany, with Russia and the
countries of eastern Europe.
Soros's personal outlook is consonant with that of the Thatcher wing of
the Tory Party, those who three years ago launched the "Germany, the
Fourth Reich" hate campaign against unified Germany, comparing
Chancellor Helmut Kohl with Adolf Hitler. Soros is personally extremely
anti-German.
In his 1991 autobiography, Underwriting Democracy,
Soros warned that a reunited Germany would "upset the balance of Europe
.... It is easy to see how the interwar scenario could be replayed. A
united Germany becomes the strongest economic power and develops Eastern
Europe as its Lebensraum ... a potent witches' brew."
Soros's recent public attacks on the German economy and the deutsche mark are fundamentally motivated by this geopolitical view.
Soros is quite close to the circles of George Bush in the U.S.
intelligence community and finance. His principal bank custodian, and
reputed major lender in the 1992 assault on Europe's ERM, is Citicorp
NA, the nation's largest bank. Citicorp is more than a lending
institution; it is a core part of the American liberal establishment.
In 1989, as it became clear that German unification was a real
possibility, a senior official at Citicorp, a former adviser to Michael
Dukakis's Presidential campaign, told a European business associate
that...
"German unity will be a disaster for our interests; we must take
measures to ensure a sharp D-Mark collapse on the order of 30%, so that
she will not have the capability to reconstruct East Germany into the
economic engine of a new Europe."
While Soros was calling on world investors to pull down the Deutsche mark in 1993, he had been making a strong play in the French media, since late 1992, to portray himself as a "friend of French interests."
Soros is reported to be close to senior figures of the French
establishment, the Treasury, and in particular, Bank of France head
Jean-Claude Trichet. In effect, Soros is echoing the old Entente
Cordiale alliance against Germany, which helped precipitate World War 1.
Soros admits that he survived in Nazi Hungary during the war, as a Jew, by adopting what he calls a double personality.
"I have lived with a double personality practically all my life," Soros
recently stated. "It started at age fourteen in Hungary, when I assumed a
false identity in order to escape persecution as a Jew."
Soros admitted in a radio interview that his father gave him Nazi
credentials in Hungary during the war, and he looted wealthy Jewish
estates. Further research showed that this operation was probably run by
the SS.
Soros did not leave the country until two years after the war. Though he
and his friends in the media are quick to attack any policy opponent of
Soros, especially in eastern Europe, as being "anti-Semitic," Soros's
Jewish identity apparently has only utilitarian value for him, rather
than providing moral foundations.
In short, the young Soros was a cynical, ambitious person, the ideal recruit for the British postwar intelligence network.
Soros savages Eastern Europe
Soros has established no fewer than 19 "charitable" foundations across
eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. He has sponsored "peace"
concerts in former Yugoslavia with such performers as Joan Baez. He is
helping send young east Europeans to Oxford University. A model citizen,
is the image he broadcasts.
The reality is something else. Soros has been personally responsible for introducing shock therapy into the emerging economies of eastern Europe since 1989.
He has deliberately fostered on fragile new governments in the east the
most draconian economic madness, policies which have allowed Soros and
his financial predator friends, such as Marc Rich and Shaul Eisenberg,
to loot the resources of large parts of eastern Europe at dirt-cheap
prices.
Here are illustrative case histories of Soros's eastern "charity":
Poland: In late 1989, Soros organized a secret meeting between
the "reform" communist government of Prime Minister Mieczyslaw Rakowski
and the leaders of the then-illegal Solidarnosc trade union
organization.
According to well-informed Polish sources, at that 1989 meeting, Soros
unveiled his "plan" for Poland: The communists must let Solidarnosc take
over the government, so as to gain the confidence of the population.
Then, said Soros, the state must act to bankrupt its own industrial and
agricultural enterprises, using astronomical interest rates, withholding
state credits, and burdening firms with unpayable debt. Once thie were
done, Soros promised that he would encourage his wealthy international
business friends to come into Poland, as prospective buyers of the
privatized state enterprises.
A recent example of this privatization plan is the case of the large steel facility Huta Warsawa.
According to steel experts, this modern complex would cost $3-4 billion
for a western company to build new. Several months ago, the Polish
government agreed to assume the debts of Huta Warsawa, and to sell the
debt-free enterprise to a Milan company, Lucchini, for $30 million!.
Soros recruited his friend, Harvard University economist Jeffery Sachs, who had previously advised the Bolivian government
in economic policy, leading to the takeover of that nation's economy by
the cocaine trade. To further his plan in Poland, Soros set up one of
his numerous foundations, the Stefan Batory Foundation, the official
sponsor of Sach's work in Poland in 1989-90.
Soros boasts, "I established close personal contact with Walesa's chief
adviser, Bronislaw Geremek. I was also received by [President Gen
Wojciech] Jaruzelski, the head of State, to obtain his blessing for my
foundation."
He worked closely with the eminence gris of Polish shock therapy, Witold
Trzeciakowski, a shadow adviser to Finance Minister Leszek Balcerowicz.
Soros also cultivated relations with Balcerowicz, the man who would
first impose Sach's shock therapy on Poland.
Soros says when Walesa was elected President, that "largely because of
western pressure, Walesa retained Balcerowicz as minister." Balcerowicz
imposed a freeze on wages while industry was to be bankrupted by a
cutoff of state credits. Industrial output fell by more than 30% over
two years.
Soros admits he knew in advance that his shock therapy would cause huge
unemployment, closing of factories, and social unrest. For this reason,
he insisted that Solidarnosc be brought into the government, to help
deal with the unrest.
Through the Batory Foundation, Soros coopted key media opinion makers
such as Adam Michnik, and through cooperation with the U.S. Embassy in
Warsaw, imposed a media censorship favorable to Soros's shock therapy,
and hostile to all critics.
Russia and the Community of Independent States (CIS): Soros headed a
delegation to Russia, where he had worked together with Raisa Gorbachova
since the late 1980s, to establish the Cultural Initiative Foundation.
As with his other "charitable foundations," this was a tax-free vehicle
for Soros and his influential Western friends to enter the top
policymaking levels of the country, and for tiny sums of scarce hard
currency, but up important political and intellectual figures. After a
false start under Mikhail Gorbachov in 1988-91, Soros shifted to the new
Yeltsin circle.
It was Soros who introduced Jeffery Sachs and shock therapy into Russia, in late 1991. Soros describes his effort:
"I started mobilizing a group of economists to take to the Soviet Union
(July 1990). Professor Jeffery Sachs, with whom I had worked in Poland,
was ready and eager to participate. He suggested a number of other
participants: Romano Prodi from Italy; David Finch, a retired official
from the IMF [International Monetary Fund]. I wanted to include Stanley
Fischer and Jacob Frenkel, heads of research of the World Bank and IMF, respectively; Larry Summers from Harvard and Michael Bruno of the Central Bank of Israel."
Since Jan. 2, 1992, shock therapy has introduced chaos and hyperinflation into Russia. Irreplaceable groups from advanced scientific research institutes have fled in pursuit of jobs in the West.
Yegor Gaidar and the Yeltsin government
imposed draconian cuts in state spending to industry and agriculture,
even though the entire economy was state-owned. A goal of a zero deficit
budget within three months was announced. Credit to industry was ended,
and enterprises piled up astronomical debts, as inflation of the ruble
went out of control.
The friends of Soros lost no time in capitalizing on this situation.
Marc Rich began buying Russian aluminum at absurdly cheap prices, with
his hard currency. Rich then dumped the aluminum onto western industrial
markets last year, causing a 30% collapse in the price of the metal, as
western industry had no way to compete.
There was such an outflow of aluminum last year from Russia, that there
were shortages of aluminum for Russian fish canneries. At the same time,
Rich reportedly moved in to secure export control over the supply of
most West Siberian crude oil to western markets. Rich's companies have
been under investigation for fraud in Russia, according to a report in
the Wall Street Journal of May 13, 1993.
Another Soros silent partner who has moved in to exploit the chaos in
the former Soviet Union, is Shaul Eisenberg. Eisenberg, reportedly with a
letter of introduction from then-European Bank chief Jacques Attali,
managed to secure an exclusive concession for textiles and other trade
in Uzbekistan.
When Uzbek officials confirmed defrauding of the government by
Eisenberg, his concessions were summarily abrogated. The incident has
reportedly caused a major loss for Israeli Mossad strategic interests
throughout the Central Asian republics.
Soros has extensive influence in Hungary. When nationalist
opposition parliamentarian Istvan Csurka tried to protest what was being
done to ruin the Hungarian economy, under the policies of Soros and
friends, Csurka was labeled an "anti-Semite," and in June 1993, he was
forced out of the governing Democratic Forum, as a result of pressure
from Soros-linked circles in Hungary and abroad, including Soros's close
friend, U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos.
In early 1990, in what was then still Yugoslavia, Soros's
intervention with shock therapy, in cooperation with the IMF, helped
light the economic fuse that led to the outbreak of war in June 1991.
Soros boasted at that time:
"Yugoslavia is a particularly interesting case. Even as national
rivalries have brought the country to the verge of a breakup, a radical
monetary stabilization program, which was introduced on the same date as
in Poland — January 1, 1990 — has begun to change the political
landscape. The program is very much along the Polish lines, and it had
greater initial success. By the middle of the year, people were
beginning to think Yugoslav again."
Soros is friends with former Deputy Secretary of State Lawrence
Eagleburger, the former U.S. ambassador to Belgrade and the patron of
Serbian Communist leader Slobodan Milosevic. Eagleburger is a past
president of Kissinger Associates, on whose board sits Lord Carrington,
whose Balkan mediations supported Serbian aggression into Croatia and
Bosnia.
Today [i.e. 1996], Soros has established his Foundation centers in
Bosnia, Croatia, Slovenia, and a Soros Yugoslavia Foundation in
Belgrade, Serbia. In Croatia, he has tried to use his foundation
monies to woo influential journalists or to slander opponents of his
shock therapy, by labeling them variously "anti-Semitic" or "neo-Nazi."
The head of Soros's Open Society Fund — Croatia, Prof. Zarko Puhovski,
is a man who has reportedly made a recent dramatic conversion from
orthodox Marxism to Soros's radical free market.
Only seven years ago, according to one of his former students, as
professor of philosophy at the University of Zagreb, Puhovski attacked
students trying to articulate a critique of communism, by insisting, "It
is unprincipled to criticize Marxism from a liberal standpoint."
His work for the Soros Foundation in Zagreb has promoted an
anti-nationalist "global culture," hiring a network of anti-Croatian
journalists to propagandize, in effect, for the Serbian cause.
These examples can be elaborated for each of the other 19 locations
across eastern Europe where George Soros operates. The political agenda
of Soros and this group of financial "globalists" will create the conditions for a new outbreak of war, even world war, if it continues to be tolerated.
Will we ever be able to convince leftopaths that we on the so-called right aren't always all racists? Or even if we are, it's merely a case of us using our brains' pattern-recognition abilities to discriminate valid differences and then rationally exercise our rights to freely associate with those we want to, and our right to exclude others we do not wish to associate with? Demanding we must associate with those we have no wish to is to impose on us, as on any others, a form of slavery.
NO. We won't be able to because it's simply slander - the notion that everyone the left disagrees with is so stupid as to always fixate on hating others because of the colour of their skins, in order to avoid the fact that we really hate them for the content of their characters (to paraphrase Martin Luther King Jr himself).
And we won't ever be able to expect an honest collaborative response aimed at finding a mutually agreeable objective universal truth from any of those subjectivist hypocrites, either - pretty-much by definition. As psycho-paths (Greek for "thought-killers") they have deliberately long since chosen to turn off their own brains, probably way back during their own childhoods, when they had first decided that acting dumb and playing stupid exculpated all mistakes and crimes equally.
Thought-killing psychopaths are initially slanderously paranoid, and so initially presume that every one and every thing is always out to get them. So, in this chosen worldview of theirs, they can't even trust their own fears to be helpful internally-generated warnings, but must regard such painful thoughts - and all rational thinking prioritizes fear over hopes, in order to help one plan to avoid making mistakes, and to solve the problems which cause the pains one fears the most - as further externally-generated pains, to be fought and ignored. Then they project their own limitations of self-distrust onto all others, too, and so must then pretend to regard us all as helpless fellow victims while really still seeing us all as enemies.
So habitual victim-blaming paranoia leads inevitably to masochistic hypocrisy.
It seems that this simple-to-observe syndrome is also probably at the root of what is laughingly described in today's excuse-making world as "mental illness."
Because other than that, all they've got is "I didn't do it! Only my BRAIN did it! Whee!"
We can't reason with people who, in having chosen emotion over reason, have habitually lobotomized and dummied them selves down to the level of animals.
Why does this "racism" trope work so well on Whites only?
Because Whites are the most individualistic and least racist people on Earth, that's why!
Let’s assume (because it’s true) that each “race” or ethnic breed of human is simply the result of different families growing up in different geographical areas, where different traits were needed to survive.
In the hot lands where food was plentiful, being lazy, impulsive, and promiscuous was the key to survival.
Laziness was a bonus because of over-heating, and unimaginative patience was needed both for fishing and for hunting (which mostly involved falling asleep near the local watering-hole, and waiting for animals to come down for a drink anyway).
Impulsiveness was needed for when on occasion a snake or panther would drop out of the trees to eat one – since fighting wasn’t an option, running away and hoping they’d eat the slower members of one’s family (even if one’s own offspring had to be abandoned without further thought) was the only logical survival response.
And since those problems existed, but so did copious amounts of food, being promiscuous and winning the survival game by creating and abandoning offspring was the way to win with quantity over quality.
Compare that to the cold lands, where food (and natural animal enemies) were scarce – in such a place, being lazy, impulsive, and promiscuous wouldn’t work, and would in fact get one killed off pretty quick.
There, one needed to plan ahead, save up food, and limit the number of mouths one had to feed.
Therefore only the smarter families have been forced by their own survival circumstances to learn how to manipulate their own environments, rather than have their environments continue to rule them.
Only they are capable of adapting to new conditions and stresses, of scrupulously learning to understand how to repair old things and invent new things.
Only they are naturally endowed with the potential foresight to be capable of managing their own estates on this planet.
And the historic White traits of individualism and self-sufficiency (which have resulted in our stable societies) are also by-products of this need (and opportunity) to plan things in advance for survival. There is far less "need" for group cohesion.
(CAPISCE, liberals?)!
Now, add to the above, what I have come to call
"The White Curse:"
Let's define terms: Intelligence is speed of thought and memory. Smarts or wisdom is how one uses that intelligence (hint: honesty is the best policy, and deliberately self-inflicted paranoid masochism leads to all other ultimately stupid "mental illnesses").
The White Curse is simply this: that increased intelligence leads to a certain type of stupidity denied to the less intelligent breeds; the one and only real drawback of White intelligence is that the ability to see so far into the future leads some of the more weak-minded ones ("liberals") to see all the potential problems as inevitable, and so they become paranoid masochists who hypocritically pretend to instantly compromise with and Submit to (and actually cause or induce others to cause) those very same problems which cause those pains they fear the most! That way, they can pretend to 'control' and cancel the additional pains caused by fearing them! Notice how all the destructive self-hating "liberals" are whites/Jews! No other breeds on earth act that way!
And naturally, this chosen stance almost instantly leads to the hypocrites "projecting" their own delusions onto their victims:
"Those on the Right say that Blacks do not have impulse control and reasoning ability.
Those on the Left say that Blacks cannot learn impulse control and reasoning ability.
Both paint with a broad brush - a very large number of Blacks have learned and do practice both abilities - but who is the greater bigot? Those who say that they have not learned, or those who say they are too inferior to learn?"
- RealityObserver -
;-)
Conslusion: Liberals are covert racists: they always assume that ONLY White Western people (including, of course, the Jews in Israel,) are INTELLIGENT enough to be guilty of being truly evil, while all their pet "People Of Colour" (including the "swarthy palestinians") being mentally inferior and all, just can't help being enslaved by their instincts and emotions into acting as violent animals when frustrated, the poor oppressed little dears, so the liberals will always indulge their crimes, much as one ignores the new puppy as it pees on the rugs.
So here's their interminably ongoing "narrative" (story):
"SO JUST STOP PICKING ON ALL THE THE POOR HELPLESS MENTALLY INFERIOR SWARTHY ANIMAL VICTIMS, YOU EVIL MENTALLY SUPERIOR WHITE BULLIES! YOU KNOW THEY’RE AT THE MERCY OF THEIR ANIMAL INSTINCTS SUCH THAT THEY JUST CAN’T HELP BEING VIOLENT WHEN CONFUSED, SO STOP BAITING AND CONFUSING THEM, YOU HATERS!"
;-)
This "racism!" they pretend to automatically decry while simultaneously implicitly indulging in and endosring, really only ever means their inherent, psychotic opposition to all "free-association" rights and "pattern-recognition" abilities (aka thinking).
“Racism” is obviously a combination of both genetics (Nature) and indoctrination (Nurture).
It’s both a natural expression of like marrying like, with the Asians being the biggest “racists” by that measurement, and also the result of our free-will right to freedom of association, on the other hand.
Without an inherent, genetic predisposition to “racism,” no “races” – not even the poor oppressed victimal “People Of Color” ones so favored by the Left – would be able to have ever existed at all!
Leftist gangsters want to nullify both our genetic predispositions and our intellectual rights to make free-will choices for ourselves – they are, as always, all about "totalitarian" total control - aka SLAVERY!
“Diversity” ALWAYS really only ever means:
“We Want Fewer White People!”
And yet whites are THE global MINORITY.
And, as such (“racism” really only meaning preference for one’s own breed, also known as a right to free association) Whites are technically the least racist breed in the world, with Asians being the most racist, and Dravidians (“Hindus”) being the second-most racist, etc.
So making plans and “laws” seeking to dilute and destroy (aka genocide) the global minority in their own lands by importing more and more of the global majorities, is not only incredibly stupid, but it should also be (and, technically, actually is) illegal.
All so-called “Indigenous Minorities” are actually global majorities, too: the “natives” in the North, Central and South Americas, are all no more than displaced backwoods hillbilly ASIANS, while the Australian Aborigines are nothing more or less than displaced Dravidians from India – as even most Dravidians still in India will openly and proudly admit to.
The very foresight which enables Whites to invent and manage stuff is also their greatest weakness, because as it allows for more vision of the future, it also tends to increase the perception of the amount of things one can perceive might go wrong, which can lead to panic and fear-based liberalism - aka gangster activity, slavery, and totalitarian total control attempts to prevent it - aka national socialism, international socialism, (aka communism) and of course one of the original classics, islam itself.
Not that non-whites aren't also affected by it, as demonstrated by their natural inclination for form into gangs ("tribes").
It's just that whites, being more intelligent, can commit these same stupid actions or crimes far more quickly and accurately.
“There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps ... then turn around and see somebody white and feel relieved.”
- Jesse Jackson -
Give Whites a pile of Bricks, and they'll make a City from them.
Give Blacks a City, and they'll make a pile of bricks out of it.
And so, as a somewhat related symptom and tangentially digressive aside:
A real human problem in general is how these virtue-signalling, thought-killing (aka "psycho-pathic") paranoid masochists so gleefully deny their own pattern-recognition abilities - they openly pretend to actually be proud of their fact-avoidance!
To psychopaths, Suspending their natural caution and disbelief in favour of unearned belief-as-false-"FAITH!" is a holy virtue.
In fact, it's (deliberately) painfully obvious that all such "religious" behavior is inherently psycho-pathological in nature.
ALL such "religious" ritual behaviour is itself nothing more than a demonstration of litrally "psychotic," thought-killing, hypocritical paranoid masochism, perhaps in its purest form, where one's feelings and opinions based on them are the only things that really matter to most if not all such unthinking, "painful"-reality-averse humans, no matter what their "race."
SO, IS THERE A SOLUTION? YES!
Libertine "liberal" criminals are almost always whites, because due to their higher intelligence, only whites can naturally be that paranoid. They often presume that since something could go wrong, so it will go wrong, so they must act first to either stop it or limit its effects by compromising with or submitting to it. They presume they can and should "prevent" crime, by first becoming criminals and attacking thereby innocent others first - just in case, and all for their own good, of course! But since crime is an intentional free-will choice, and not a predictable trend or syndrome, nor a "mental illness" or a "spiritual sin," it cannot ever be prevented before it occurs and so everyone who tries to stop others from attacking first, BY attacking them first while they're still innocent victims, instantly becomes the thing they hate most: the criminals they fear & oppose!
Lazy people prefer to cast blame and remain indolent rather than work to improve them selves.
Are millions of whites in the Balkans still sitting around, refusing to work unless and until the Turkish sultan's descendants pay them "reparations" for enslaving their ancestors?
No?
Have the Jewish people ever sat around and refused to invent things, until Pharaoh's descendants paid up?
No?
Come to think of it, why aren't the blacks in Africa (and America) extorting the muslim Arab slavers who were and still are responsible, for reparations?!
Morally and intellectually delinquent Libertine "liberal" criminals prefer to slander and extort their victims to bring them down or 'equalize' them, rather than work to improve them selves.
That's the default setting for criminals everywhere anyway: they all want to force an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, pretty-much by definition.
Their "Socialism" game is really only gangster extortion leading to slavery; despite it's fluffy label, there's nothing "sociable" about that!
So of course they will try to twist reverse and nullify cause and effect in all categories of thought, public discourse, and inquiry (it's just what they do, and who they are) and that includes "race."
But what if there is a real problem of disparity between the races, and what if it could be solved?
Interestingly, studies have shown injecting whites with melanin makes them lazy and impulsive, too.
Probably a simple beta-blocker could be developed to help all black people free them selves to reach their true potentials, but big pharma prefers their victims - all of us - to remain dummied-down, low-info ... slaves!
Blacks in general are far more lazy, impulsive, and promiscuous than whites, as is proven by the fact that they can't build stable societies much less invent things.
So there must be a reason for it.
Turns out that Yes there is.
So there must be a solution to the problem, too.
But racist liberals waste all of our time denying the problem exists and attacking those who admit it does and want to help solve it.
"Luckily" - but only ever for them, never for the rest of us, as their targeted victims - their default setting of lazy, jealous anger allows them to "fail upwards" all the time, as they prefer to charge money to monitor and assuage the almost infinite tangential symptoms produced by refusing to solve basic problems.
LIBERAL RACISM aka "Lived Experience" is subjectivism which is really only group victim-identity politics, seeking to divide and conquer people by emphasizing their differences, with the ultimate goal of having only criminals judge criminals, by pretending that only criminals can understand the inevitable forces which caused "the other victims'" predatory choices (because there is no free will choice, only a diversity of separately experienced forces influencing diversely different groups of helpless victims, especially when being marginalized by mentally superior white racists and being unable to defend them selves because of their implied mental inferiority).
But many if not most whites are really only anti-"stupidists," not "racists."
Whites want to run businesses with more intelligent and less stupid people, so they try to hire only smart people, while turning the stupid ones away. So while many whites and most blacks don't measure up, only the blacks get to claim racism and extort the owners for unearned welfare in lieu of paychecks.
Beyond "You Owe Me!" their other motto must be
"There's No Money In Solutions, so: Please Give Generously - AGAIN!"
Bottom line?
There IS a problem of black laziness, impulsiveness, and promiscuity. Admitting a problem exists is the first step in solving that problem! Since melanin is not only a skin dye but also a neuro-transmitter, it will probably be easy to develop a simple beta-blocker to free blacks from their history of being unable to create stable societies or invent stuff!
"Neuromelanin Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Increased Dopaminergic Neuron Activity in the Substantia Nigra of Patients with Schizophrenia: Neuromelanin has a T1-shortening effect, which was a similar characteristic of the cutaneous melanin."
;-)
Delinquent libertine "liberal" criminals deny racial differences exist, but ignoring problems is no way to solve them. I greatly prefer polite intellectual racism to that of violent black racists or the white racists who defend them in denial of their own shortcomings. "Racism" (being truthful about our observations) might actually solve the problem of black laziness, impulsiveness, and promiscuity! Admitting a problem exists is the first step in solving that problem! Since melanin is not only a skin dye but also a neuro-transmitter, it would probably be easy to develop a simple beta-blocker to free blacks from their history of being unable to create stable societies or invent stuff if liberals let us.
After multiple assurances that it was a voluntary agreement, the EU has declared that the “UN Migration Pact legally binding after all,” but through the back door — the way many such schemes are implemented. Loopholes are manipulated while the public is given a false sense of security. This particular back door may not even be legal, but the EU is trying to make appear to be.
As it it was not enough that the European public is being betrayed, the International Organization for Migration chief, Antonio Vitorino, demanded an end to ‘Negative Narratives’ on Mass Migration. That should raise alarm, but won’t.
The Pact — officially named the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” — indicates that “No country can address the challenges and opportunities of this global phenomenon on its own.” This is a hint of the plan for the imposition of this pact upon sovereign nations. It is a declaration that sovereign states are unable to address issues pertaining to their own borders and migration on their own, and must rely on the globalist United Nations to help them. The UN, meanwhile, is so trustworthy that last week it gave Iran a seat on the “U.N. women’s rights committee which judges complaints alleging violations of women’s rights.”
Suspicions about the Migration Pact have not been “conspiracies” of the “alt-right,” as the establishment media claims. The Pact came this far as a result of the willful blindness and utopian fantasies of the Left.
In Canada, in a similar case, the “alt-right” was blamed for raising the alarm against the “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103, with the Leftist media insisting that it was not a legal document. As usual, the media was short-sighted, with few exceptions. M-103 ended up being incorporated into a massive $23,000,000 anti-discrimination plan called “Taking Action Against Systemic Racism and Religious Discrimination Which Includes Islamophobia.” Part of this “action” includes “monitoring citizens for compliance,” training law enforcement to investigate online and offline “hate speech,” and other such “action” that threatens democracy and free speech. “Action” also included payouts to groups including CAIR-CAN (renamed the National Council of Canadian Muslims) and IRFAN (a group stripped of funding by the previous Conservative Government for connections to jihad terror) for their input into the 23-million-dollar “action” plan.
The precise status of the UN Migration Pact is still being debated, but one thing is clear, aside from strenuous efforts to maximize its powers through the back door. The UN and Brussels are trying to force the Pact upon sovereign states, even those that rejected it, and maximize its impact. The European Commission’s Legal Service is holding to the view “that the UN compact should have legally binding consequences for every EU member state including those which withdrew from the agreement.”
Austrian EU Commissioner Johannes Hahn insists that “that “UN General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and you can not declare parts of them binding.” At this point, every free nation should vehemently oppose the UN Migration Pact, which the EU and UN are trying to force upon their citizens, who are the ones who will pay a heavy price economically and in regard to their security.
Internal documents reveal that Brussels plans to incorporate the controversial UN migration pact into the EU’s legal framework “through the back door”, Austria and Hungary have warned.
Earlier this week, Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl told Brussels the government was opposed to a report by the European Commission’s Legal Service declaring that the UN compact should have legally binding consequences for every EU member state including those which withdrew from the agreement. The compact describes mass migration as “inevitable, necessary and desirable”.
As an increasing number of countries, including a handful of EU member states, began to have doubts about the UN compact in the weeks and months leading up to its signing in December last year, figures including Germany’s Angela Merkel insisted to its opponents that the document was non-binding, while media outlets attacked any suggestion to the contrary as “far-right conspiracy theory”.
Given these repeated assurances from key European figures, Kneissl told local media she was “astonished” to discover the document showing the Commission had apparently reversed its previous stance that the pact was non-binding.
On Monday, the populist Freedom Party (FPÖ) minister handed a paper outlining the government’s position on the matter to Austrian EU Commissioner Johannes Hahn, which said the country rejected the Legal Service’s conclusions on the basis that “UN General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and you can not declare parts of them binding”.
Dismissing the issue as a “storm in a teacup”, according to the Kronen Zeitung, Hahn said that the position of the European Commission remained that the so-called UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration is not legally binding.
The FPÖ’s leader in the European Parliament, Harald Vilimsky, said the developments regarding the EU paper had proven his party was right to push for Austria’s withdrawal from the agreement.
As a governing coalition partner, the populist party acts as “a protective umbrella for Austria and defends the country’s interests,” he said, noting Kneissl had made clear that the nation was “against European Commission plans to bring the UN migration pact in through the back door”.
“We insist on retaining national sovereignty on the issue of asylum and migration… It cannot be the case that there is a ‘right to migration’ [brought into EU law], because that would leave Europe with unsolvable problems,” added Vilimsky.
At a press conference in Brussels Monday, Kneissl’s Hungarian counterpart, Péter Szijjártó, described the Commission report as “tangible proof” that the EU was planning to make the UN compact mandatory across the entire bloc, stating that the Legal Service had formulated “lengthy and devious” legal grounds for making the agreement legally binding.
member of the Muslim community” — and who with several other men refused to stand for the national anthem — accused the board of “systemizing Islamophobia.” (See video below.)
