Re: THE COVID-19 PLANDEMIC and "THE GREAT RESET:"

SO, WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE?! 

Criminal (((hypocrites,))) aka psychopaths, leftists, collectivists, communists, etc want what everyone else has, and they don't want to have to work to earn it (unless anyone really thinks that lending money is a form of "work"?!) so they demand this "equality of outcome" for them selves, but then (beyond being members of the global counterfeiter's union) they also simply have to sell it to others in order to form extortive "totalitarian" crime-gangs to 'totally' control and enslave everyone else, by claiming to want that very same equality of outcome to be available for everyone else as equally-helpless fellow victims, too. And the way they pretend to justify that, is by asserting that their original right to an equality of opportunity was denied to them by evil straight White alpha males, because superficially they are obviously more evolved for competitive survival than beta-male and beta-female "gays," non-Whites, and women. And that's all there ever really is to any of it.

So it's only the same, ages-old communist gangster demand for equality of outcome (aka theft from industrious Makers to be given to lazy Takers). Mobs of lazy criminals want to "RESET" ownership and "BUILD BACK BETTER" with them having all the stuff others built this time. And all any "SOCIAL CREDIT SCORES" will measure is one's ability to lie about it, to go along (with those criminal lies,) to get along (with the lying criminal extortionist gangsters telling them). There's really nothing more or less to it all than that - it's very simple; binary, even.

Further, re: "Does anyone really thinks that lending money is a form of "work"?" When you only have to "reserve" a tiny (10% at most) fraction of your "reserves" ("fractional reserves" lending) then you're 'lending' (selling money by renting it out on the installment plan) nine or ten times the money you don't actually have - that's counterfeiting! There's no risk involved! Beyond that, when you relentlessly and routinely 'lend' to both sides in every conflict, then, when the dust clears, the losers still owe you AND the winners, the winners still owe you, and they BOTH have to take out more loans for the reconstruction efforts! And, beyond even all that, when they put all of their "future derivatives" into bet-"hedging" "baskets" of funds, it all evens out! So, in the end, there's absolutely ZERO calculation involved. The (((globalist))) banksters print the money, and, since the world currently runs on the oil standard based on the American dollar, and most if not all corporations are indebted to (((them,))) they already literally OWN THE WORLD. But the only thing left, the real trick, is to convince the peons that, because we owe (((them))) that (((they))) own us! These Ponzi pyramid "finance" schemes they've built up - where charging "interest" (usury) always pays the userers, even if and when businesses fail, through insurance they themselves own, (whereas in real investments, both sides win and lose and the risks and rewards are shared equally) like in our pension plans, always have to have every-new inputs at the front end to remain viable or "sustainable." And so, while they simultaneously destroyed the West by tricking our women into believing we were enslaving them, seducing them by "Feminism" into diluting the labor pool (thus doubling their own pools of available workers, while cutting ALL of our wages in half!) they thereby punked not only "their own" workers, but also their potential customers, into having far less disposable income to spend! "SO" they then had to repeat the process, by shaming us into thinking we had enslaved the rest of the world, so we owed all those poor oppressed "People of Color" the right to come here, dilute our workforces while - once again! - cutting our wages in half, doubling their workers pools, and replacing us with hordes of swarthy Muslims who literally work for food!and replacing us with hordes of swarthy Muslims who literally work for food!

Brandon Smith: Is the globalist “reset” failing? The elites may have overplayed their hand

One aspect of narcopaths (narcissistic sociopaths) that is important to remember is that they live in their own little world in which their desires and bizarre dysfunctions are universally "admired." They believe themselves superior to most people because they are predatory and don't suffer from annoying hang-ups like empathy and conscience, and they generally tend to believe they have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes the majority of the time. They think that you are a submissive idiot and that when they bark an order, you will simply jump to attention because you "believe."

Almost every aspect of the globalists and their behavior indicates they are a club or cult of narcopaths. Their obsessive need to control as well as to corrupt and destroy in order to get what they want is not an extension of mere greed, it is a deep-seated aspect of who they are as beings. It is a defining mechanism at the core of their character. They are real-world monsters, like vampires attempting to blend into an unsuspecting population.

In their arrogance, they tend to believe they can drain the public dry at will without being resisted or exposed. The problem is, as soon as they start to feed and destroy, they draw attention to themselves. Eventually, they will attract the suspicions of the public along with some vampire hunters. Unless they find a way to hide, a stake through the heart is inevitable.

I have been writing about the threats of globalism and the "reset" for many years now, and I have noted for some time two separate quandaries: one affecting the liberty movement and the other affecting the globalists:

1) First, criminals tend to brag about their crimes when they think that it's too late for anyone to do anything about them. I predicted the globalists would be very open in revealing their agenda the moment they believed themselves "untouchable." For the freedom loving public this suggests that in 2020 going into 2021 that the elites must think there is nothing that can be done to stop the machine; they are so blatant in their calls for the global "reset," a cashless society, totalitarian lockdowns and a surveillance state that no one in their right mind can claim these notions are "conspiracy theory" anymore.

The fact is, the "conspiracy theorists" were right all along, and now there is nothing anyone can say about it.

2) Second, I have also argued in the past that the globalist push for a "new world order" is a double-edged sword that could very well end up annihilating them. As they attempt to initiate their reset agenda, they become more and more exposed; they can no longer lurk in the safety of the shadows and there is no going back once the process is started. Once the globalists become widely known, they must either swiftly take control through engineered chaos and collapse, or face retribution that could eliminate a cabal that took them centuries to build. Vampires must make the rest of the world a dark place before leaving the shadows, or they risk dying in the light of day.

There are two schools of thought in the liberty movement; one suggesting that the globalist agenda is fixed and unstoppable and that the best anyone can do is survive. The second suggests that the reset can be stopped, and the globalists can be brought to justice. I stand in both camps.

There are aspects of the reset that are indeed fixed and that cannot be undone. For example, numerous national economies including the U.S. are in the midst of a stagflationary collapse and there is nothing that can be done to reverse it. Perhaps a decade ago we could have changed course, but now it is too late. The pain can be reduced if people quickly end their dependency on the system and create localized trade networks of their own, but the economy as we know it right now is dead and it is not coming back anytime soon.

I do not see this, though, as a win for the elites. Crashing the economy is one thing, rebuilding it into the collectivist dystopia they desperately want is another. Everything depends on who rebuilds; maybe it will be them, maybe it will be us.

I am seeing some encouraging signs these days that the globalist reset is not a sure thing, and those that know my work know I have never been one for misplaced optimism. Specifically, the exploitation of the pandemic response as a means to ram through numerous draconian measures does not seem to be going exactly as the elites planned.

I have to look back at Event 201 to really gauge the state of the game because what the elites planned and what has happened do not completely match up. For those not familiar, Event 201 was a type of "war game" held by globalists from the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The scenario? A pandemic outbreak of a coronavirus that would spread like wildfire and kill a predicted 65 million people. The simulation was held only a couple of months before the real thing happened at the start of 2020.

In the year since the outbreak, the globalists have attempted to enforce nearly every plan that was outlined during Event 201, including using social media to censor or restrict any news or information outside of the establishment approved narrative (Yes, narrative control was discussed at the event in great detail). 

Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum has consistently and excitedly applauded the pandemic crisis as a "perfect opportunity" to institute the "reset" that the globalists have been talking about for years.

Unfortunately for them, the virus has not been anywhere near as deadly as they appear to have hoped. With a death rate of well below 1 percent for anyone outside of a nursing home with preexisting conditions, the establishment has now been forced to pump up infection numbers as a means to terrorize the populace because the death numbers are not enough to convince people to willingly hand over their freedoms. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for COVID-19 not counting nursing home deaths with preexisting conditions is only 0.26 percent of those infected.

There is a propaganda meme being passed around these days that tries to exaggerate the danger of death from COVID, and it goes a little something like this:

"COVID has killed more people than the Vietnam War and the Gulf Wars combined in a single year, therefore your freedoms are forfeit..."

This is an idiotic talking point but luckily no one is buying it. Over 40 percent of COVID deaths are people that are already sick and on the verge of dying anyway (And no, refusing to wear masks is not the same as endorsing "death panels," because a death panel is about socialists refusing treatment to people at risk because of their age. No one is suggesting that old people be refused treatment, and they always have the option of staying under quarantine if they fear they will become infected. They are already retired and receiving Social Security, perhaps if we are going to stimulate then the bailout money should go to those most at risk so that the rest of us can continue on with normal life?)

Hundreds of thousands of people die every year from diseases and illnesses including the flu, common colds and pneumonia, yet, the prospect of abandoning the Bill of Rights, submitting to economic shutdowns and wearing a muzzle on our faces wherever we go was never brought up before.

Why should we ask 99.7 percent of Americans or the world to accept medical tyranny just to make .26 percent of the population feel safe? People who question the mask mandates are called "selfish," but even if I was one of the people susceptible to the virus, I would never demand that 99 percent of the population bow to totalitarianism at the off chance that I might live a little while longer. Now that would be selfish.

As more and more studies and data are released, the mask mandates are also coming into question. Though Big Tech has sought to suppress or censor studies that run contrary to the mainstream narrative, this has only led more people to question the motivations of government pushing the mandates. After all, the mainstream media keeps saying that we should "listen to the science," but they ignore or censor the science. So, if the pandemic response is not based on science, then it must only be about control.

Many Americans are not as stupid as the elites think. They see the inconsistencies in the rhetoric and the data, and they are increasingly prone to refuse to comply. This might be why the establishment is suddenly rushing out two COVID vaccines in the span of half a year; they have to get the vaccine phase of the Reset underway before too many people jump from the panic bandwagon.

The vaccine rush and the claims of effectiveness of 94 percent to 95 percent from Pfizer and Moderna are coming into question. The average effectiveness of most vaccines is around 50 percent, and these are vaccines with hundreds of trials and years of usage. Somehow, Pfizer and Moderna were both able to produce a vaccine for a SARS type virus when the multiple governments tried for over a decade to produce vaccines for SARS in China and were unsuccessful, and they were able to achieve 95 percent effectiveness?

Many people are not buying the vaccine story, and this is perhaps why the elites are jumping headlong into vaccination so fast. Consider this fact:

Numerous polls indicate that at least 1 in 3 Americans plan to refuse the COVID vaccine when it is released to the general public. Sixty percent of Americans have stated in polls that they will not take the vaccine unless it is proven to be at least 75 percent effective.

Here I think we have our explanation for the vaccination bonanza. The elites know that a third of Americans (and probably Europeans) will not take the vaccine regardless of any propaganda they dish out. They also know that 60 percent of Americans are unlikely to take the vaccine unless they can show an effectiveness rate of at least 75 percent. Neither Moderna nor Pfizer have actually produced any evidence that their vaccines have prevented severe illness or death from COVID, so, their effectiveness rate is based on "projections" of success according to their minimal trials. Meaning, the effectiveness rate of 95 percent is completely made up.

Why did they go with such a high number instead of a more realistic 50 percent to 60 percent? Because the polls say they need a high rate in order to trick Americans into taking the vaccine. I think it is really as simple as that.

Americans are skeptical of the vaccines for a number of reasons. The reality that they are highly untested and rushed out in less than a year is one reason. The fact that the government and the media have been caught censoring or lying about COVID data is another reason. People just don't trust the elites, and who can blame them? Who would trust a cabal of psychopaths to inject them with an unknown viral cocktail? Maybe their intentions are not so pure?

The public is right to be suspicious. A former Pfizer vice president, Dr. Michael Yeadon among other medical professionals have recently warned that the vaccines have not been adequately tested and that there is a risk of "indefinite infertility" for women who take the current COVID vaccine due to damaging autoimmune response. In other words, the vaccine could make many women barren and unable to bear children.

Maybe this is what Bill Gates meant when he stated in his TED Talk that "vaccines and reproductive services" could help contribute to a reduction of the Earth's population of 10 percent to 15 percent as a means to "stop global warming."

Why would Bill Gates mention vaccines in the same breath as "reproductive services" in reference to population reduction? Aren't vaccines supposed to help people live longer? Well, the Pfizer VP's warning about the COVID vaccine is ringing bells for me. Maybe the COVID vaccine won't make you sick or kill you. Maybe you will live a long life free of coronavirus, but you'll find out a few years after taking the vaccine that you won't ever be able to ever have kids.

In the meantime, the elites are trying with everything they have to convince the public that they must abandon notions of civil liberties in the name of survival and "the greater good." They are already talking about how things will never go back to normal and how the changes being made today will stay in place for many years to come.

Governments are in the media right now claiming the vaccines "will not be mandatory." This is a lie. At the same time, they are putting mandates in place to require you to prove you are vaccinated in order to go to public places and even to go to work. Basically, you take the vaccine or you die from poverty. This is not a choice.

But I see millions of Americans standing in opposition to this agenda. I see sheriffs and police across the country refusing to enforce the agenda, even in hard-left states like California. I see the reset scheme being exposed and the truth breaking into the mainstream. I see something rising to the surface, and I smell that gunpowder scent of rebellion, and I like it.

I'm not pessimistic about the future. I know a crash is coming. I know a fight is coming. But right now, what I see is a fight that can and will be won by those that respect the principles of freedom. The globalists may have overplayed their hand.

To truth and knowledge,

Brandon Smith

Editor's Note — We have compiled some basic preparedness information in our book, How to Survive the Collapse of Civilization, and we're making it available to you for free. It contains practical, actionable survival advice for all manner of disaster scenarios and can help get you started on your road to survival in these uncertain times. Go here to get a copy. 

Lowly Ottawa JP Gets Censured by Panel of Hypocrites for Upholding the Law

 JUSTICE OF THE PEACE SHOULD BE REMOVED, panel majority says

From here and here:

First, lets have a look at what she actually said, back on the 14th of March of 2016, in a National Post op-ed:

"Julie Lauzon: When bail courts don't follow the law - a justice of the peace in Ottawa's main bail court explains how Canada's bail system is broken.

Two successive reports have revealed just how broken Canada’s bail system is. As a justice of the peace sitting in Ottawa’s main bail court, this unfortunately comes as little surprise.

In this country, accused people are legally presumed innocent and those who are held while awaiting trial are not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause. At their first court appearance, detainees are paraded in front of a camera in the basement of this courthouse, in handcuffs and shackles, where they speak to a JP via video link. Legally, they are supposed to be asked whether they wish to appear by video, or if they prefer an in-person appearance, yet this is generally not done.

Some will be remanded to another date, given the nature and severity of the charges. Others, for whom the prosecutor does not seek further detention, are released. The Criminal Code of Canada clearly states that unless the prosecutor shows why certain conditions are necessary, the JP is to release the person with a simple undertaking, or promise, he or she will return for their next court appearance.

It is at this point the law goes out the window, and cynicism and bullying kick in. Here in Ottawa, generally speaking, the JP will be told that the person is being released, and provided the list of conditions that have already been typed into the system.

Pity the JP who dares ask for a justification of those conditions. It is the JP’s legal responsibility to ensure that the conditions placed on a person’s bail are reasonable, lawful and appropriate. This is also reflected in the fact that the JP and the accused sign the release document, not the prosecutor, or the accused’s lawyer. Without sufficient justification for these conditions, individuals are to be released without them.

Some counsels are of the view that because conditions are consented to by the accused and the prosecutor, they should be accepted by the court, in the same way joint submissions on sentencing are. That would be fine, were it not for two monumental differences between bail and sentencing.

First of all, the person is presumed innocent at the bail stage. He or she has not yet been convicted of a crime and may actually be innocent of any wrongdoing. Secondly, after being found guilty, negotiations on sentencing occur on a level playing field, with both parties possessing the same powers. That is not the case with bail. The prosecutor is the only one who can consent to a release. If the accused does not accept the prosecutor’s conditions, he or she will not be released and may have to wait any number of days for their bail hearing.

The fact is that people will agree to just about anything to regain their freedom and go back home to their families and daily routines. I have seen alcoholics and drug addicts accept a condition of abstinence. If only it were that easy. I have seen homeless people promise $1,000 to the court. If they breach that condition, they are basically agreeing to pay that money. It should come as no surprise that they simply don’t have it. I have also seen men cry because, in order to be freed, they agreed not to see their children, on account of allegations made by the mother, of which the children played no part.

As a result of my interpretation of bail law, I have, in recent years, had a prosecutor turn his back to the court and tell all the defence lawyers that all deals were off the table as long as I was presiding. More recently, I had a prosecutor scream at me and basically throw a temper tantrum after I questioned certain conditions. I have also had a prosecutor ask that I recuse myself from all bail hearings, given my interpretation of bail law.

Between forced, rushed video appearances, a lack of respect for the JP bench and the absence of the rule of law in this court, I can no longer call it a court of law. It is a disgrace. I am there to administer justice. It is not my job as a JP to sign off on release documents that are unlawful.

As judicial officers, we are supposed to know the law and apply it according to our legal interpretation. We expect and accept that if one or both parties disagree with the court’s decision, they have the right to appeal. It thus comes as a shock when prosecutors attempt to wrestle jurisdiction from the court, through a variety of unacceptable tactics, rather than exercise their right of appeal.

Bail is not an opportunity or an invitation to fix people and to address all their issues with a myriad of conditions. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Criminal Code of Canada lay out the legal rights and responsibilities when someone is charged with an offence. Unfortunately, Ottawa’s main bailout court, and others, have devolved into dysfunctional and punitive bodies, devoid of the rule of law."

OKAY, FAIR ENOUGH: EVEN THOUGH SHE FORGOT TO MENTION HABEUS CORPUS, WHICH WOULD ONLY ADD TO HER CASE, SHE MAKES SENSE AND MENTIONED NO NAMES. ALL-IN-ALL, A SHORT, SWEET, WELL-THOUGHT-OUT ARTICLE.

SO NOW, LET'S SEE HOW THE POWERS-THAT-BE INTERPRETED SUCH MILD CRITICISM:

Justice of the peace ought to be removed from office: disciplinary panel

The majority of a disciplinary panel found that removing Justice of the Peace Julie Lauzon from office “is necessary to restore public confidence in the judiciary and the administration of justice.”

Article By Shaamini Yogaretnam Publishing date: Dec 01, 2020 Physical hardcopy P.#A3.

An Ottawa justice of the peace who called the bail system broken and criticized prosecutors in an op-ed in the National Post should be removed from the bench, a majority ruling from a disciplinary panel has found.

Justice of the Peace Julie Lauzon’s misconduct and her own testimony at her disciplinary hearing are “so seriously contrary to the impartiality, integrity and independence of the judiciary that it has irreparably undermined public confidence in (her) ability to perform her duties,” the panel wrote in a decision released Friday.

TO THE EXACT CONTRARY OF WHAT THESE PROFESSIONAL HYPOCRITES HAVE CLAIMED, SHE SHOWED HER PERFECT IMPARTIALITY AS IN A LACK OF FALSELY BLIND PARTIALITY TOWARDS A BROKEN SYSTEM, GREAT INTEGRITY OF CONSCIENCE THROUGH HER HONEST APPRAISAL, PROVING HER JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, WHICH, FAR FROM UNDERMINING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN HER ABILITY, IN STEAD COULD ONLY UNDERMINE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE BROKEN SYSTEM AND THOSE WHO FALSELY ACCUSE HER IN ORDER TO PROMOTE ONLY THEIR OWN PARTIALITY AND LACK OF INDEPENDENT INTEGRITY - TO WIT, THE FRAUDS WHO ACCUSE AND JUDGE HER HERE, WHO BY DINT OF HAVING SO-EXPOSED THEM SELVES, HAVE UNDERMINED THIS MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC'S CONFIDENCE IN THEIR OWN CAPABILITY OF BEING IMPARTIAL ENOUGH TO ACCEPT CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM IN THE ROUTINE COURSE OF THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES!

That “erosion in confidence” has made Lauzon “incapable of performing the duties of her office.”

The majority of the panel found that removing her from office “is necessary to restore public confidence in the judiciary and the administration of justice.”

Lauzon wrote a March 2016 op-ed in the National Post in which she said Ottawa’s bail courts were a “disgrace” that had “devolved into dysfunctional and punitive bodies”, and essentially called prosecutors bullies who dictated unlawful releases to justices of the peace. The op-ed “betrayed her ethical obligation to remain impartial,” the panel found.

The three-member disciplinary panel unanimously found in May that Lauzon committed judicial misconduct when she wrote the op-ed.

“We found that Her Worship used the power and prestige of her office to make disparaging comments about Crown counsel and the bail courts in Canada and, in so doing, failed to uphold the fundamental principles of judicial office,” the panel wrote.

NO. SHE DIDN'T MENTION ANY PEOPLES' NAMES, BUT NOTED THAT SYSTEMIC ABUSE AND THE CORRUPTION OF HABITUAL ENTITLEMENT ON THE PART OF SOME CROWN PROSECUTORS HAD CREPT INTO THE SYSTEM, WHICH NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED!

THE ONE AND ONLY FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IS "DO NOT ATTACK FIRST."

SHE ONLY NOTED HOW THE CROWN ITSELF, THROUGH ITS PROSECUTORIAL AGENTS, HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY PRESUMING PEOPLE "INNOCENT UNTIL ACCUSED OF BEING GUILTY," OR "GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT," AND ALSO "GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!" TO CALL THIS CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR A "DISGRACE" AS SHE DID, WAS NOT TO MAKE "DISPARAGING COMMENTS" BUT TO ACCURATELY DESCRIBE HER OWN MILIEU.

The panel also found that the op-ed “was personal and retributive in that (Lauzon) intended to exact retribution on a number of Crown Attorneys in particular: those whom she believed had shown her or her office disrespect.”

LYING SACKS OF SHIT! HOW COULD THAT WORK, SINCE SHE DIDN'T NAME THEM?!

Lawyers for Lauzon argued that the publicity of not only the backlash to the op-ed, but also the disciplinary process, had “significant effects” on Lauzon, who did not need any further punishment from the panel. If one had to be imposed, a reprimand would do, they said.

But the majority of the panel found that Lauzon’s misconduct was deliberate — planned and thought out. 

WHO ARE THESE FACELESS AUTHORITIES? NAME THEM!

“Her Worship was the sole author of the article. She chose a forum with a high degree of visibility in which to express and disseminate her opinions about the administration of justice and the Crown Attorneys who appeared before her. She testified that she chose both her words and the forum with intention and purpose.”

Two of the three panel members recommended removal from her role while the third member recommended a 30-day suspension without pay with a reprimand. 

NAME THEM.

Lauzon testified at her hearing that she stands by the opinion piece and her reasons for writing it. She also believes its publication had a positive effect on the bail system.

But, according to the panel, that “testimony also revealed that she continues to harbour disdain bordering on contempt for Crown counsel. This speaks to (her) lack of respect for her ethical obligation to appear to be and to remain impartial.”

The panel found that writing the opinion piece was not related to her job or to the duties of her office. “By writing about bail court in a national newspaper, however, she chose to blur the lines between the professional and personal spheres of her life.”

OBVIOUSLY, WRITING ABOUT THE TRUTH OF HER JOB CONDITIONS AND THE DUTIES OF HER OFFICE WAS EXACTLY WHAT SHE WAS DOING, THUS REMAINING LITERALLY IMPARTIAL ABOUT HOW AND WHERE THE CHIPS MIGHT FALL. WHAT THEY PREFERRED WAS OBVIOUSLY THAT SHE SHOULD REMAIN ENTIRELY PARTIAL TO "THE SYSTEM" AND DEFEND IT AS IF IT WERE PERFECT, NO MATTER WHAT THE COST TO HER OWN CONSCIENCE MIGHT BE.

The recommendations are now with the attorney general.

Lawyer Lawrence Greenspon, who represented Lauzon, said the panel’s finding “failed to take into account the importance of this justice of the peace speaking out about the bail process in her court.”

Since the original op-ed, the Supreme Court of Canada, in two separate and unrelated decisions, has validated Lauzon’s concerns with the bail system, Greenspon said.

“Given the four years during which she has continued to work as a justice of the peace, the decision to remove, by the majority, was an unnecessarily harsh sanction for an isolated act of misconduct over the course of an otherwise unblemished career,” he said.

HER OWN LAWYER IS A SACK OF SHIT - SINCE THE SUPREME COURT HAS VALIDATED HER CONCERNS, TO CONTINUE TO PRETEND TO ADMIT SHE'S GUILTY OF MISCONDUCT IS A SELF-SERVING ACT OF BETRAYAL.

Lauzon will be filing a notice of application to divisional court for judicial review later this week, Greenspon said. That appeal will come with a request for an interim stay of the order to remove her from the bench, Greenspon said.

Lauzon had also requested that her legal fees be covered in full. Those costs total $202,481.31.

The panel unanimously recommended the attorney general cover $112,010.68, plus tax, of those costs."

WOW, WHAT A PILE OF LYING HYPOCRITICAL SELF-SERVING BULLSHIT. CLEARLY, THEY ARE "PROJECTING" THEIR OWN LEGAL AND MORAL FAILINGS ONTO THEIR VICTIM!

A Plea for Help in Telling the Truth from World-Net Daily

Thomas Paine famously said, “These are the times that try men’s souls.” We’re in just such times right now, when our great country is closer to a state of war between its own citizens than at any time since the Civil War. Why is that?

Because leaders of the Democratic Party – when they’re not busy canceling Thanksgiving and Christmas, and driving our children to suicide by forcing them to isolate themselves at home – have spent months busily scheming, encouraging and enabling massive voter fraud of every imaginable sort. As a result, we are saddled with one of the most spectacularly crooked elections in American history.

This in turn sets Americans up for one of two disastrous outcomes:

One, Joe Biden wins and the nation profoundly splits in two because 74 million outraged Trump voters know full well that the Democrats stole the election from them, that the senile Biden is not the legitimate president, and that he and Kamala Harris will destroy America with their party’s completely deranged far-left policies.

Two, the Supreme Court does its job and Donald Trump dramatically ends up winning a second term, and about the same number of Biden voters conclude that Trump, whom they are constantly assured by the media is exactly like Adolf Hitler, stole the election from them and will now destroy their country. (And remember, many Biden voters were already prone to rioting and burning down the nation even before the election.)

That’s a pretty good recipe for civil war – or at least for a disastrously divided, dysfunctional, angry and unhappy nation wracked by political violence.

So what to do?

First, regardless of who ends up as president, if Americans become convinced their nation’s elections are a joke, a cynical charade, and that their votes mean nothing because some hidden corrupt elites are elevating to power whomever they choose, America is finished. Period.

Therefore, the main order of business – even at this late date – is to expose the massive voter fraud, get the evidence into the Supreme Court, and hopefully transform what so far is a monumentally rigged election into a fair one, and in the process restore integrity to our nation’s electoral system.

But wait. We’re still told by CNN, the New York Times and the rest of the establishment media that there is no widespread voter fraud. It’s all just a racist Republican conspiracy theory. Even when Trump himself tweets about obvious fraud, Twitter slaps a warning on the president’s message, saying: “Voter fraud of any kind is exceedingly rare in the U.S., election experts confirm.”

Oh, right. Apparently Twitter’s “election experts” didn’t see the surveillance video revealing Georgia poll workers being told to go home, but several remaining behind who, when alone, proceed to pull out suitcases from beneath a table containing more ballots and counting them.

They didn’t hear about the sudden surge of 20,000 mail-in votes magically appearing for Joe Biden in Fulton County, Georgia in the wee hours of Nov. 5, while approximately 1,000 votes for President Trump mysteriously disappeared from his own totals in that critical swing state where Biden currently holds a razor-thin lead.

But that was just a “glitch,” you see, according to officials with the widely used Dominion Voter software, a company run by a top lieutenant of far-left billionaire activist George Soros, and where Nancy Pelosi’s former chief of staff is a key executive and Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband a major shareholder. With that crowd running things, what could possibly go wrong?

Big Tech’s “experts” also apparently didn’t hear about the computer “glitch” in Michigan that mistakenly credited 6,000 Republican votes to Democrats, and reports that 47 other Michigan counties used the same software. They also didn’t hear about the Post Office employee swearing to law enforcement that postal workers were ordered to stamp ineligible ballots that arrived on or after Nov. 4 as having arrived on Nov. 3 so they could be counted. Or the middle-of-the-night vote dumps in battleground cities that were overwhelmingly for Biden, including a tranche of 23,377 ballots in Pennsylvania that were all were for Biden – virtually a statistical impossibility. Or the illegal locking out of Republican poll-watchers and the papering over of windows in Philly so no one could monitor the vote counting. And many, many more examples.

But now let’s take one step back and acknowledge that what led us into this terrible vote-fraud situation was yet ANOTHER massive fraud – one every bit as evil, corrosive and ruinous as election fraud: I’m talking about America’s fraudulent news media. Only today’s Pravda-like press could have enabled someone like Joe Biden – obviously disintegrating mentally, wrong on every issue, lying continually, and as recent evidence proves, one of the most spectacularly corrupt politicians in modern American history – to become the Democratic candidate and very possibly the next president.

As Tucker Carlson recently commented: “When the smoke clears from this election, there’ll be a massive realignment in the media, no matter who wins. Because they showed who they are. And it’s so unappealing, it’s so far from journalism, that it can’t continue.”

That’s right. No matter how this election disaster ends, the media landscape will be forever changed. Most so-called “mainstream journalists” have disgraced themselves beyond repair, having proven they are no better – and no different – than Pravda, the pretend “newspaper of record” in the former Soviet Union that was actually just a craven, lying, servile propaganda mill for that totalitarian regime’s ruling elite.

Thus, whatever the future holds after this election, Americans are going to need, more than ever before, a moral, courageous and TRUTHFUL “free press” to help everyone navigate what promises to be a tumultuous, dangerous and unpredictable era ahead.

But telling the truth about Joe Biden’s decades-long family corruption, serial plagiarism, continual lying, dismal half-century track record, growing dementia and more has become almost impossible. The truth about Kamala Harris being rated by the nonpartisan GovTrack.us as the most leftwing member of the U.S. Senate – further left than Bernie Sanders – not to mention being one of the most dishonest, vacuous, insincere, abrasive, condescending and excruciatingly unlikeable candidates for high office in our lifetimes. The truth about the Chinese coronavirus – about what real science actually says about masks, about lockdowns, about medications like hydroxychloroquine, about school openings, about the importance of early treatment and much more. And much more – including the truth about America’s “mainstream media” having morphed fully into the militant, continually-lying propaganda wing of the Democratic Party.

WorldNetDaily fully intends to remain a key part of America’s truth-proclaiming free press in the days, months and years to come. Indeed, our motto since 1997 – long before most of the rest of the online media pack even existed – has been “A Free Press for a Free People.”

Unfortunately, as I’ve told you before, powerful forces are hard at work attempting to destroy us.

Starting in September, Facebook suddenly decided to massively suppress WND’s traffic on their platform – by about 90%. Around the same time, three major international online ad companies – TripleLift, AppNexus/Xander and Teads – canceled WND, seriously hurting our revenues. Google has essentially written WND out of its search algorithm so that unless you specify “WND.com” in your search terms, WND rarely shows up. The Southern Poverty Law Center, the leftwing hate group that many Big Tech companies rely on to identify hate groups, characterizes WND as a hate group – one engaging in “manipulative fear-mongering and outright fabrications designed to further the paranoid, gay-hating, conspiratorial and apocalyptic visions … from the fringes of the far-right and fundamentalist worlds.” Translation: We’re conservative and Christian.

You get the idea.

The problem with WND is not that we’re “conspiracy theorists” or “anti-gay” or, as one of the three canceling advertising companies alleged, that we engage in “hate speech.” The “problem” is that we dare to publish the truth, something increasingly forbidden in today’s media culture.

We at WND have been warning America for over three years – longer than virtually any other journalists, since shortly after the 2016 election – that Big Tech intended to crush conservative expression and to do everything within their power, moral or immoral, legal or illegal, to prevent Donald Trump’s re-election. Guess what: They’re doing precisely that right now, more brazenly and destructively than ever, and WND is in danger of being mortally wounded in this war. Furthermore, if indeed Biden becomes president, the attacks on us will just get immeasurably worse.

Please help us. We have been hit very hard. It’s very difficult for us to pay our terrific and dedicated journalists, all of whom have taken major pay-cuts and missed paychecks entirely.

If WND doesn’t survive, the Left – from Big Tech and the “mainstream media” to the Democratic Party and their rioting street goons – will be overjoyed to gloat over the demise of America’s original, pioneering, independent online news source, now in its 24th year.

The great Thomas Jefferson astutely said this about America’s wellbeing: “The only security of all is in a FREE PRESS.” Jefferson was right; an honest, truth-based press is precious and essential for a free society. To keep America’s free press alive, please take a minute to make a donation of any amount. Everybody at WND will be enormously grateful.

Whatever the election’s final outcome, Americans of good will are going to have to stick together. If Trump somehow ends up winning, the left will go violently insane. (Yeah I know, they already are.) And if Biden wins, 74 million Americans will know they were cheated, journalistic truth will come under greater attack than ever under a Biden administration, Big Tech will not be reined in, but rather encouraged to suppress conservative speech; and of course, Big Media will lie their heads off like never before.

The bottom line is, if you want honest, truthful, hard-hitting news reporting by veteran journalists who honor God, America and the Constitution, please help us out now, so we can be there for you, come what may. In other words: Let’s help each other.

Thank you so much, and God bless you.



David Kupelian
Vice President and Managing Editor, WND
Editor, Whistleblower magazine
Author, "The Marketing of Evil," "How Evil Works" and "The Snapping of the American Mind"

Is this real?

 Alternative sweetener fights the 'sugar virus'

All the chronic diseases of aging thread their roots back to insulin offense. Even the novel coronavirus has an affinity for attacking those with diabetes and the issues surrounding "syndrome X" as I have called it — inflammation due to blood sugar problems and a decrease in the intake of nutrients.

In case all of the cakes, cookies, candies, treats and sugar-covered foods in abundance this time of year haven't tipped you off, we are in a nation hooked on sugar and burdened with the diseases of insulin offense — obesity, diabetes, cancer and heart disease. The coronavirus attacks in particular people with these maladies.

Savvy people, dieters, diabetics and those concerned with insulin and blood sugar, seek sweeteners that have a very low or no glycemic (insulin-elevating) index.

Consumers look to the label to identify the calories, fat, protein and carbohydrates present in a product. Labels are required to convey this information, but, guess what, food processors are not required to reveal the blood sugar, insulin-elevating and fat-storing properties of the product.

This is gross deception because the glycemic index of our sugar consumption determines over time our health and quality of life. Sugar subtracts years! Americans are getting more and more obese simply because our diet causes us to create blood sugar, store it as fat, and destroy our insulin production. High sugar consumption and blood sugar-increasing foods guarantee degenerative disease and early death.

I have never heard of an allopathic doctor warn against insulin malfunction. The FDA does not warn customers about how sweeteners stimulate blood sugar, insulin, reactive hypoglycemia, or fat-storage.

Diabetics, hypoglycemics and everyone needs to know the glycemic impact (insulin-elevating) of a sugar or sweetener before they ingest it. The key to health and controlling both excess body fat, blood sugar (glucose) and insulin is understanding the effects that sugars and sweeteners have on the body.

Almost all commercial foods are pumped full of high glycemic sugars (insulin-elevating). They conceal this with "no fat" or "low fat." The medical monopoly and widespread propaganda have people focused on the fat myth. Not one word about the high risk of sweeteners, both white sugar and synthetics.

The more sugar (any sugar) that packaged foods contain, the lower the cost to produce. In fact, sugars like high fructose corn syrup are used as cheap fillers. Americans love it because they are hooked on sugar.

When you see on almost every packaged food "low fat" or "no fat," this deception means one thing to the customer and another to the manufacturers. When fat is taken out, a greater far more dangerous fat is replaced. The replacement fat is called sugar and is at a much lower cost. So the big fat lie is a huge moneymaker!

Since glycemic index labeling is not required by the FDA, we have to know which sweeteners to avoid.

More deception! A food can legally claim to be "Sugar Free" and "Calorie Free," but in fact contain up to 5 calories per serving. These five calories may be high glycemic (insulin stimulating).

A product may legally contain an entire sugar-bowl of insulin-stimulating, fat-storing ingredients, and still be called "Sugar Free." FDA labeling laws allow very fattening, insulin-stimulating products to be presented as "healthy."

Be advised that sugar in a food product can appear as carbohydrates, maltodextrins, glucose polymers, and under many other deceptive names. It's the glycemic index that gets us regardless of the name.

In actuality, most sugars like maltodextrins or glucose polymers used to disguise sugar content have a higher glycemic index than pure sugar. Pure sugar or honey wouldn't be nearly as bad.

Rice cakes are "no sugar" favorites of diabetics, but these cakes elevate insulin dramatically. One has to be a detective just to choose non-glycemic foods that actually almost do not exist.

Reduced-caloric sweeteners — very low or no glycemic response are: maltitol, sorbitol, isomalt, xylitol, HSH, erythritol, mannitol, Lo Han and lactitol. In purified form, these are made through a chemical synthesis catalyzed by enzymes.

Sweet relief

Would you believe that the only product with no glycemic index impact is banned from being called a sweetener by the FDA? Stevia does not disturb insulin but due to FDA regulations, it cannot be marketed as a sweetener, only as a dietary supplement.

We consider that stevia is in a separate category from other sweeteners. It is up to 300 times sweeter than white sugar (sucrose). South Americans have used this totally non-caloric sweet herb for more than 1,500 years.

It is widely used all over the world, but as you would guess, it cannot be sold as a sweetener in the United States because of lobbyists for the artificial sweetener cartel and the FDA. It can be purchased only as a dietary supplement.

"In addition to its natural, powerfully sweet taste, (you only use a very mild, light dusting) research shows that stevia actually regulates blood sugar and reduces high blood pressure. It's an extremely effective aid in weight loss and weight management because it contains no calories. It also reduces your desire for alcohol and tobacco use." Quoted from Dr. James Balch, M.D. in his newsletter Prescriptions for Healthy Living.

Stevia not affect insulin in any negative way. This is good news to a nation of diabetics. It's a miracle as a food supplement for everybody.

A very small amount goes a long way; in fact, far less than other so-called sugar substitutes and it has a neutral taste.

Research in Japan has found stevia to be perfectly safe to be used in any food recipe, chewing gum or mouthwash. It is used on cereals, herb teas, coffee and anything else that you desire.

Stevia is high in chromium (which helps to stabilize blood sugar), manganese, potassium, selenium, silicon, sodium and vitamin A. It also contains iron, niacin, phosphorus, riboflavin, thiamine, vitamin C and zinc. So you see, stevia is a very excellent food dietary supplement.

Stevia's primary effectiveness is against:

• Diabetes
• Food Cravings
• Obesity
• Sugar substitute
• Tobacco Cravings

Secondary application for:

• Addictions
• Hypoglycemia
• Hypertension
• High Blood Pressure

Research has demonstrated that stevia liquid concentrate inhibits the growth and reproduction of harmful bacteria and other infectious organisms, including those that are a problem for the food and cosmetic industries. Stevia also inhibits the growth of gum disease bacteria and tooth decay, and in many countries it is used in oral hygiene products.

You can make your own concentrated stevia liquid by diluting stevia powder with water. Simply swish in your mouth and swallow. This ability of stevia to destroy infectious organisms may help explain why stevia users report fewer colds and flu.

Less known but no less remarkable is the ability of water-based stevia concentrates to help heal numerous skin problems, including acne, seborrhea (discharge of sebaceous matter on the head causing dry scales or dandruff), dermatitis and eczema.

It also has been observed that placing it on cuts and wounds brings more rapid healing without scarring. It may cause a severe stinging for several seconds, but is followed by a significant lowering of pain. Physicians have reported using stevia concentrate to heal psoriasis and burns, while others have reported that it is extremely helpful in healing various lip sores.

Daniel Mourrey, Ph.D., a scientist and director of The American Phytotherapy Research Laboratory says, "Few substances as stevia have ever yielded completely non-toxic tests whether used internally or externally. There has never been any known abnormalities in weight change, cell or membrane characteristics, enzyme or chromosome characteristics, no cancer, no birth defects, no acute and no chronic negative effects."

As a sweetener, only a very light dust of stevia concentrate is needed, making stevia far less expensive than all other sweeteners. However, you may prefer the liquid form because the liquids don't need other fillers like maltodextrin, but can be made with just stevia leaf and water. Also, when using whole leaf or powdered stevia, you don't get an even distribution of sweetness, meaning you could get a "dose" of super-sweetness. This can activate your bitter-receptors as well as sweet-receptors, leaving a slightly bitter aftertaste.

Switching to stevia concentrate for all your sweet needs can be an extremely important step in restoring your health and in reversing the aging process.

Yours for the truth, 

Bob Livingston