Subjectivist Hypocrisy IS Crime!

"In the 1960s, being a 'free spirit' was actually a set up for being a socialist/communist because it implied subjectivism.

That is, the belief that 'there are no values. Everything is a matter of opinion. So let's have fun without giving a damn.'

 With subjectivism in place, multiculturalism ('Western culture with it traditions of freedom and individual rights is not vastly morally superior to decadent European socialism and the primitive savage belief systems of third world countries, particularly Islam.') and political correctness ("Since if anyone speaks their mind, they may hurt someone else's feelings, so the government must regulate, or abolish entirely, freedom of speech.') both came right long behind."

 - Douglas Mayfield -

 Criminals are all about forcing equality of outcome!

 Evil only poses as stupidity.

 Subjectivism IS a criminal attack, as it is a stance indicating disagreement with the Golden Rule.

 It is a refusal to abide by the agreement to not attack first, and thus it is a first-attack threat.

Nannystaters' telling of people they have no right to defend themselves IS also attacking them first. 

Subjectivity is all about double-standards, so it cannot make sense from an objective principle POV. 

All criminals (i.e: libertine "liberals") are hypocrites (they call it "cognitive dissonance," and doctors pretend it's called "schizophrenia")!

 Libs are subjectivists, all about the double standards: only they have rights, while everyone else only has responsibilities, enslaved to them.

 "Morally Relative Subjectivism" = more commonly known as "hypocrisy."

Libtarded virtue-signalling immoral relativism/subjectivism/hypocrisy is really a criminally (i.e: intentionally) negligent THREAT - you can't pretend to split the difference between good and evil, and even the attempt outs you as being part of that evil. Libs can claim to be non-compus-mentis all they want ("all facts are really only opinions! Whee!") but either way, since they deny they have any real responsibilities to others to obey the Golden Rule of Law and not attack first, they ARE attacking first! Just lock them all up!

 All double-standard subjectivists are hypocrites. All hypocrites are criminals.

 Criminals are all about forcing equality of outcome!

 CRIMINAL LEFTARDS ARE ALWAYS REALLY ONLY ALL ABOUT PROJECTING "I'M BETTER THAN YOU!"

 Which is why they are inconsistent all the time.

 If and when one's criminal stance is all about subjective double-standards, and against objectively equal universal rights and responsibilities for everyone, where one asserts that only one's own "better" faction has rights, while all others have only responsibilities to one's self and one's faction, then of course pretty-much each and every issue one addresses will be inconsistent and libtarded!

Criminals always advise insane things to their potential victims - like that they should embrace suicidal masochism and refuse to defend them selves, and that the ultimate crime is to cause offense in hurting the criminal's feelings by accusing them of their crimes - which makes them look stupid or insane to sane folks, and look crafty and 'realistic' to other criminals.

 Criminals always want subjectivism - double standards - to apply, never universal objective principles. They want rights - especially the false right to remain irresponsible - to apply for themselves, while they also only want their victims to be responsible to them. Sharia "law" follows this crime-model to a T.

 Libertine "liberal" criminals insist they be allowed to "progress" to always extort others to have ever-more rights to be delinquent - and in fact to remain irresponsibly wrong, with ever-less responsibilities - because, as all humans choices were really ever only 'caused' by a complexity of historically predetermined, predestined and inevitable previous causes and effects, (far beyond our knowledge or capacity to ever understand them, such that we will forever all remain fallible and potentially dangerous victims), then their hypocritical subjective and emotive rejection of all objectively universal facts beyond 'this one true fact,' (that chaos is predictably inevitable LOL) proves them wrong:

 For if and when they alone are granted endless rights with no responsibilities, then from whom do these rights proceed?

 Well, from their own chosen victims, or course: from those deluded and so mentally inferior 'conservative' humans who, foolishly believing in objectively universal facts and free-will choices, are dumb enough to have enough hope for the future to become makers, from which the much smarter liberal takers (aka worthless parasite) can derive their lucrative subsistence, by forever spinning merely temporary and easily-solved problems with obvious and easy, permanent solutions, into eternal crises for which there are only at best temporary band-aid 'palliative therapies' available, and even then only by submitting to the expert authority leadership of the obviously much-smarter, far more shrewd, realpolitikingly decisive liberals.

 Deciding there is no solution, and so that in fact the only real solution is to try to instantly become a part of any given problem, works out great for them!

 Well, so far, anyway....!

Subjectivist hypocrites actually endorse objectivity to legitimize their claims: because they claim that "inevitable" (predictably, universally objective) albeit otherwise unknown and unknowable, predestined and predetermined forces are always behind every "false illusion" of human free-will intent and choice.

So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles:

Law-abiding Conservatives: "Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!" 

Criminal libertines: "But what CAUSED that choice? There's always a cause!" 

Their implication is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we're all "victims."

In this way, they proudly enslave themselves to the crime-excusing 'inevitable force' alibi! 

EXACTLY AS THE MUSLIMS DO WITH THEIR IDOL CALLED "ALLAH!"

 Further, there is no cause-and-effect morality: Since predation CAN happen, "Therefore" it WILL always happen; "So" we MUST form ever-larger gangs to pre-emptively, defensively extort & deter enemies in order to safely accuse and punish them for their potential crimes BEFORE they can commit them!

ALL of the so-called “soft” sciences are VICTIMOLOGIES – sociology, psychology, and even criminology – because they all begin by looking at symptoms of human behavior, but quickly “progress” to the false premise that they must look for CAUSES of those behaviors – and said causes must always be inevitable, predetermined predestined mysterious magical forces beyond anyone’s control! (The implication being that we are all really ever only helpless victims – of “society” / mere products of our environments, or as Marx put it, of “Historical Predeterminism” and as Muhammad put it, as proudly Submissive “slaves of allah”)!

Simple human free-will choice is the ONLY answer they will NEVER accept!

AND WHY? Because ALL HYPOCRITES ARE CRIMINALS, AND ALL CRIMINALS ARE HYPOCRITES!

SO: What is this "hate-speech" notion, of which the leftopaths are so fond, and why should it be considered a crime if it's NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

If it's not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech - or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one's life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating - then it's THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of 'hurt feelings!' So it isn't objectively "offensive," but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively "offended" by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive 'arguments' to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (criminals by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

PROOF Berkeley Cops Were Told to STAND DOWN

"Totalitarian Thinking:" Total Control of Others = Slavery

See also part 1, here: http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/2017/04/leftopaths-exposed.html

Everyone loves to be wanted, at least temporarily, but rarely do people want to be needed, (chained to others' needs) except the most fearfully insecure people.

And, naturally, almost nobody wants to need others, to be enslaved to their whims.

But insecure, cowardly slavers try to reverse those natural inclinations and assessments, to trick other potentially dangerous and fallible people (their intended victims) by pretending to the opposite: that we are all in fact, such helpless victims as individuals, that we need other people just to survive, much less to thrive.

Whereas in reality, we have the natural right to make circumstantial, situational assessments and choices based on our individual discriminations of our own wants and needs, fears and hopes, and on other peoples' trustworthiness - whether only subjectively presumed, or objectively proven - as to whether or not we should act in a more 'positivist' manner, to try to defuse their needy fears by working to make them feel safe, and/or to assuage their potential greedy wants by making them feel happy, respectively ... those same insecure, cowardly criminal gangster extortionists will try to use their threats of group-might-made "right" violence to force us to go along (with their criminal lies) to get along (with all the other lying criminal slavers).

This slavish creed of forced, false "altruism" has historically been known as 'Fascism,' 'Islam,' and 'Communism.'

Today it's most commonly known as "Social Justice."

PS: Unfortunately, this enforced (or at least, threatened) enslaving creed of forced false altruism is also embodied in Christianity, by way of the 'positivist' ("Do Unto Others") slant of Jesus' creed.

The correct, albeit more 'secular' version of The Golden Rule is Confucius' "Do Not Do Unto Others!"

But at least the free-will choice is emphasized, and the threat delayed to after death, and the force reserved to God alone, not man.

Bottom line? Everyone wants to be wanted on occasion, but only insecure hypocrites pretend they (and everyone else) need to be needed,and so it's their right to tell others they should embrace suicidal masochism and slavery because they are helpless victims in need of an expert authority leader! The best way for a criminal to disarm his intended victims is to tell them they were always victims anyway, and further that he is not an oppressor but really only a concerned fellow victim!

LEFTOPATHS EXPOSED

Leftopaths don't think, they "feel" - that the best solution is to instantly become a part of the problem!

As masochists, they always pretend to be able to control their own fears, BY causing those very same, worst-case scenario problems, (like by siding with evil people like muslims and antagonizing and extorting innocent others on their behalf) which cause the pains they fear the most.

They call this instantaneous cowardly Submission to their own fears, "shrewdness," and "realpolitik," and laugh at how "slow" their collaborative, symbiotic and helpful conservative "enemies" are for always trying to cooperate and solve what they consider to be far too "complex" logical problems with those silly opinions called "facts!" And they can be guaranteed to embrace gangster extortion leading to slavery (aka "Socialism," "Fascism," and "Islam") because obviously in order to avoid potentially dangerous, fallible humans we must always form into ever-larger gangs (of potentially dangerous, fallible humans)!

Since they are proudly non-compus-mentis, that's how they should be treated: they should be banned from all voting and political discourse until they prove they can pass a logic and sanity test!

BEYOND THAT, Leftopaths HAVE TO LIE because their message is "SLAVERY IS GOOD FOR YOU!"

Re: "From each according to his ability, to each according to their needs!"

THAT is simply SLAVERY defined; no property rights: you make, they take.

Such perpetual gang-rights extortion always leads to individual slavery.

Communism is simply gang-rights SLAVERY, where individuals can't own stuff.

Our forefathers should have made that a tad more clear in the public schools, because these days, feral Millennial SJWs are taught 'cultural' communism.

MARXISM IS SLAVERY.

Marxism is slanderous extortion based on victimology where they claim to have no free-will choices because they are ruled by (and perpetual victims of) inevitable force: "Historical Predeterminism."

That slander is extortion, based as usual on their gangsters' group rights and perpetual victimology ideology, which implies they have a permanent oppressor against whom the ends always justify their chosen criminal means.

Leftopaths 'arguments' are only ever that there should be laws against hurt feelings, because that's their main weapon to extort other people, like this: "Someone sort of like you, somewhere else, at some other time, might have oppressed someone like me or them, so YOU OWE "US" (i.e: me) now!" Their "Socialism" is gangster extortion leading to slavery. That's all it is, and, despite the fluffy label, there's nothing "sociable" about perpetual extortion (slavery). Criminal gangster extortionists hate their victims having self-defense rights! All criminals are lying hypocrites who use fraudulent slander to pretend that they're the real victims, and their victims are the real criminals!

So, exactly like Fascism and islam, "Marxism" is no more or less than an alibi to excuse the criminals' crimes in advance!

Re: “Socialism is where the workers own the means of production” – no, it isn’t.

That’s simply multiple ownership of shared property (whether it be a formal partnership or an employment contract, because, as liberals hate to admit, your time spent on labor is also your own property, as the money your employer trades for your labor time is his property) – and it can depend on contractual inequalities where some of them can get more out of it when they put more into it – and that includes capital investments:

If I buy a warehouse and a store and the equipment to run them (desks, chairs, cash-registers, etc) and then hire people who haven’t put anything into it, but promise to work for a certain rate, then I’m the owner and they are my employees.

“Socialism” is extortion which pretends that this contractual relationship is really only in fact slavery, and I’m evil oppressor because I bought the store and hired people, giving them the means to support them selves & their families.

“Socialism” then gathers a gang of unemployed non-tax-paying and non-property-owning lazy dead-beats to vote in a “government” gang to “redistribute” (steal) my wealth, and give it to them.

That’s called slanderous extortion, theft, and slavery, and as such, is a crime – albeit a currently “legal” one.

Why does any Western army enlist Soldiers of Allah? Will they catch on? NO! "Our leaders" are insecure control-freak cowards.

Here's both how and why we're screwed (see part 2, here):

http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/2017/04/totalitarian-thinking-total-control-of.html

Obamigration Continues

Are we such a garbage dump of a nation that we must desperately give citizenship to anybody and everybody we can find?

Newsflash: This is the greatest nation God has seen fit to raise up in the history of mankind. We can not only have the cream of the crop from other nations; we can ask them to wait in line, obey our laws, and prove themselves — and the ones worth having will do it because this is the place people all over the world dream of coming one day. American citizenship is a precious thing and it shouldn’t be given to people whose first act upon American soil was to violate our laws.

There are many compelling reasons President Donald Trump is not wrong on the immigration issue.

First, there's our border. The United Nations reported that 97 percent of the illegal immigrants who enter the U.S. clandestinely do so across the nearly 2,000-mile Mexican border, but only 20 percent of those who cross illegally are caught.
And, illegal immigrants do bring crime. Of the 61,529 criminal cases initiated by federal prosecutors in 2013, more than 40 percent were filed in court districts neighboring the border. Nearly 22 percent were drug-related, 19.7 percent were violent crimes, and 10.2 percent involved white-collar offenses.

Immigrants are also killing Americans. Per the Center for Immigration Studies, 57 percent of the 76 fugitive murderers wanted by the FBI in 2009 were foreign-born. The Center also disclosed that in Maricopa County in Arizona, 22 percent of felons are illegal immigrants.

The Pew Research Center estimated that there are nearly 12 million illegal aliens in the nation — and the key word is "estimated." Trump made that point when he said that illegal immigration is "coming from more than Mexico. It's coming from all over Latin America, and it's coming probably from the Middle East. But we don't know. Because we have no protection and we have no competence, we don't know what's happening. And it's got to stop."

The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth,

Jonathan Chambers
Patriot Vigilante


P.S. If you're like over 40 million of us in the United States, you're coming up on Social Security age, and thanks in part to illegal immigrants, there's no money for us.

Leftopathic Ottawa Citizen Demands Canada Become Syria!

From pages D1-4 of the Ottawa Citizen, on Saturday, April 8, 2017, and online (for a time) here:

IF WE WERE SYRIA

Syrian war’s awful toll would stretch across Canada

Numbers cannot tell the story of a nation's tragedy, but as Shannon Gormley writes, they can help bring it closer to home.

• Ottawa Citizen
• 8 Apr 2017
• Shannon Gormley is an Ottawa Citizen global affairs columnist and freelance journalist.

SOURCE: UNHCR.ORG; DATA.UNHCR.ORG; THEGUARDIAN.COM; SN4HR.ORG; STATISTICS CANADA 2016 CENSUS; MOHAMAD ABAZEED/AFP/GETTY IMAGES SHANNON GORMLEY AND DENNIS LEUNG

IF CANADA WERE SYRIA, WHAT WOULD THE REFUGEE CRISIS LOOK LIKE?

If Canada were Syria, large parts of this country would be wrecked: abandoned by the living and home to the dead. But which parts, precisely? Where might the wreckage lie?

Syria’s crisis is unfathomable to all but those ruined by it; 470,000 people are dead. Another 11,300,000 are displaced. Numbers this absurd must be made familiar to be believed.

As things stand, the crisis remains inaccessible. Population indicators are obviously poor measures of collective trauma. Syria’s war is certainly much worse than suggested by the comparison to Canada that you’re about to find here. This one won’t reflect the particular geography of war. Nor will it adjust for Canada’s population size, which is larger than Syria’s; nor reflect the full losses to a country’s culture and society.

Still, let’s say it’s enough, for the moment, to account for the loss of human beings.

Having come to terms with the weakness of the whole exercise, we might consider the most gentle possible reckoning of what would happen to our country, then, If Canada Were Syria:

Ottawa is deserted. Toronto is deserted. Montreal: deserted. Vancouver, Hamilton, Winnipeg, Calgary, Saskatoon, Quebec City and Guelph are ghost towns, too, as are Brockville and Perth. As for Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, New Brunswick, the Northwest Territories and the Yukon — these also, whole provinces, have been vacated.

Canada’s greatest metropolises and many of its smaller places, too, are empty. Gone. Cleared out.

No, they wouldn't, you flaming delusive retard! Syrian cities are still occupied, which is why they are still having problems hosting rebels and foreign invaders, and why you can complain about 'civilian deaths!' If there were no 'civilians' (and according to the Qur'an, no muslim is an innocent 'civilian') then the war would have no impact on anyone at all!

The next question is: Where would we flee?

Most of us can’t leave Canada, or won’t. That means everyone from Ottawa, Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal and Hamilton sticks to our borders even if we’re pushed to the edges. We stay in our country, if not in our homes, left behind in the debris that was once a nation by circumstance if not by choice. When the bombs fall, we disperse then huddle, finding shelter in anything with a roof on it, from schools to hospitals. Not that these are safe from our leaders, who target them.

The Syrians aren't huddling along their own borders, since none of their own muslim Arab (and Farsi) neighbours will take in ANY of them anyway! NO adjacent muslim country - not Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar or the UAE will take in any of them - so why should we bring any over here?

IF THEY WERE US

(THERE'S A LOT MORE IMAGES OF "LIBERAL PORN" - DEAD BODIES & WRECKAGE  - IN THE PRINT EDITION)

But some of us run farther, heading for the hills abroad.

Maybe we do it because we have more money; maybe because we take on the risk of running ahead before sending back for our families, assuming they’re still alive and we are, too.

That's fucking insane! What military-aged man would abandon his own family in a war-zone, tard?!
Especially while taking all the family money away with them to parts unknown? You are a vile liar.

Our friends warn us that we may be greeted by barbed-wire fences, detention cells and roving gangs of neo-Nazis. But what’s that to planes that spit fire, the bombs and the sarin? When those of us from Winnipeg, Calgary, Saskatoon, Quebec City, Guelph, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, New Brunswick, the Northwest Territories and the Yukon are forced to choose between the devil we know and the devil we don’t, we leave for an uncharted hell.

Without our families? Yeah, maybe I can see you evil selfish entitled liberals doing that, but not us!

Some of us bring our kids along. But the kids who are lucky enough to get out of the war may not get to class: More than 1.5 million of our refugee children aren’t enrolled in school. Before the war, our classes taught about 25 children each. The kids have had to leave their desks empty in 60,000 classrooms, and their futures behind.

Really? "Some" of us? How many is that? I'd say (and the UN agrees with me) at most, ten percent!

These are the living. So what of our dead?

Six years of largely governmentsanctioned homicide has killed an estimated 470,000 Canadians. Everyone from Windsor, North Bay, Sarnia, Kingston, Cornwall, Hawkesbury and Cobourg is dead.

Bullshit. Where are you getting such inflated data from? Even the UN can't make such estimates!

At their time of death, the inhabitants weren’t all civilians. Which isn’t to say that they deserved to die. Some were fighting in good faith against a repressive regime; others were forced by a repressive regime to fight.

Lies. Most of the 'rebels' aren't even from Syria, they are foreign jihadis hired and armed by Obama.

But if someone can only bring themselves to care about civilians, they should know this: Of the mortuary cities of Windsor, Kingston, Cornwall and Cobourg, every dead body in Kingston, Cornwall and Cobourg belongs to a civilian.

“Civilian” is such an inexact term, though. We can parse it further. Surely we’ve learned that in a civil war death doesn’t discriminate by age.

According to the Qur'an itself, there are no muslim civilians. Family members are obligated to jihad.

And so, I’m afraid we have to look at the dead kids now. Dead babies always make great liberal porn.

Of the 207,000 murdered Canadian civilians, 24,000 are children. Of course, you will have a difficult time picturing 24,000 dead children for reasons of scale as much as emotional capacity.

Imagine this instead: Their corpses could fill 308 Canadian school buses. Three hundred and eight bright yellow hearses, your standard-size Blue Bird, carrying as many as 78 small bodies each.

Do all the bodies in your fantasy have to be "small" ones? Are you insulting the fat kids' memories?!

Anyway, while we are leaving behind everything we own and know, or burying our families, or dying ourselves, the world is debating.

It debates the merits of intervening to try to save some of the Canadians. It worries that the repression and killing of Canadian is complicated, as if any war is uncomplicated, and that our war is not their problem, as if the bodies of our kids are not washing up on their shores.

We die, we run, we climb into rafts and choke on gas and still the world debates, debates even the merits of taking us in. It worries that Canadians aren’t good at finding jobs immediately after escaping civil war; or that we are very good at finding jobs, too good, better than their own people.

Ah, you've presumed that the world just has to take in refugees while it attacks our own government.

We will worry too: those of us abroad, about whether we’ll ever get to go home, or be made to feel at home in the places to which we’ve had to flee; those of us stuck, about whether we’ll ever get out.

More bullshit - 'we' left our families behind from areas which had enjoyed peace and no battles for over 3 years, just like the people-smuggling Alan Kurdi's father did, just to find better jobs in countries which had absolutely no responsibility to us (in the West) simply because the Qur'an tells all muslims they must leave muslim lands and go invade all remaining infidel lands for allah. And that is the exact same official holy reason that none of our 'peaceful' muslim neighbours took us in.

But anyway, it’s just a silly thought experiment. Canada is Canada and Syria is Syria, so in the midst of the greatest humanitarian disaster of our lifetimes we can return to feeling proud of that one time we let in 25,000 refugees, equivalent in size to many unknown towns rather smaller than most of the 20-odd places we’ve imagined could belong to the dead and the driven-out if Canada were Syria.

Their corpses could fill 308 Canadian school buses. Three hundred and eight bright yellow hearses ...

i.e: "THINK OF THE SYRIAN CHILDREN, NOT OURS! BRING MORE JIHADIS HERE, QUICK!"

BUT WAIT! THIS LEFTOPATH HAS BEEN BEATING THIS DEAD HORSE FOR YEARS!

If Canada were Syria

Shannon Gormley

More from Shannon Gormley

Published on: June 1, 2014 | Last Updated: May 30, 2014 4:02 PM EDT (She's been at it for years)!

In this picture taken on Thursday, May 29, 2014, a Syrian refugee girl sits in a classroom at a Lebanese public school where only Syrian students attend classes in the afternoon, at Kaitaa village in north Lebanon. More than 1.1 million Syrian refugees are now living in Lebanon. Hussein Malla / CP

Share Adjust Comment Print

AMMAN, Jordan — At the hands of a sociopathic government, foreign militants and their own neighbours, millions of Syrians have suffered from chemical attacks, kidnappings, bombings, shootings, rape, displacement and torture.

Notice how only their government, foreigners, and their neighbours did it - no Syrians involved at all!

But at the hands of the wider international community, they’ve suffered from — among other things — the limited powers of the human imagination. As World Vision humanitarian worker Meg Sattler told me in Jordan last week, the sheer magnitude of the crisis is too overwhelming to picture.
To aid Canada’s stunted imagination, I’ve grafted the Syrian crisis onto Canada, comparing affected Syrian populations to roughly equivalent Canadian populations. The Canadian government must provide more humanitarian assistance, pressure other wealthy countries to do the same, and stop pretending it will eventually resettle a mere thousand Syrian refugees. Instead, it should actually resettle thousands of Syrian refugees as quickly as possible. Were our fortunes reversed with Syria’s, we’d expect no less from the international community.

Three notes on the numbers: first, Syria’s pre-war population was 22 million and Canada’s is around 35 million; second, my Canadian examples are localized, which fails to account for the broad geographical dispersal of loss in Syria; finally, most figures are based on registered refugees or conservative estimates, which fails to account for many Syrians.

In other words, rather than risk exaggerating the Syrian crisis, the following comparison dramatically understates it. And yet, if Canada were Syria, even an understatement would look something like this:

• Everyone in Sudbury is dead. Every single person: combatants, civilians, and 10,000 children. All gone. The 160,000 people have been killed in a variety of ways: by barrel bombs filled with chlorine gas, by gunfire, or in detention, often after being tortured with electric cables and other means.
• Rape is becoming pandemic. All the women from Ottawa’s Capital and Kitchissippi Wards report being victimized by gender-based violence. That’s 38,000. Women from other communities are targeted too, but don’t report it.
• To escape the ongoing violence, the entire traumatized populations of Toronto, Mississauga, Ottawa, Montreal and Quebec City have abandoned their condos, apartments, suburban homes and mansions and fled to neighbouring municipalities and farms elsewhere in Canada. Many of these 6.5 million people live — often hungry and fearful — in gymnasiums, basements, tents or with relatives, wondering if the violence will reach them again and push them farther on, which it often does, or waiting for it to end.
• Others know that if the violence doesn’t end — and no end is in sight — then nowhere in Canada will be safe. So the Maritime provinces and the city of Laval have also fled their homes, but to other countries.
• The crossing isn’t easy. Tens of thousands of Canadians have been detained in prison-like holding centres. Some make the journey by boat, only to be turned away by violent officials in Maine; many drown.
• Across the globe, countries like Australia don’t let Canadians in at all, afraid that we’ll hurt their economy and/or culture. European Union nations have only offered 12,000 places, barely enough for just the residents of Mississippi Mills to find refuge.
• Nearer the epicenter of the crisis, Connecticut has kept its borders open to Canadian refugees, hosting the entire populations of Nova Scotia and PEI. It initially refused to build formal camps though, forcing many of the 1.1 million refugees to live in informal tent settlements or squat in abandoned buildings.
• All of New Brunswick fled to Massachusetts, which did build formal camps: the entire populations of Saint John and Moncton live in the largest one, amidst harrowing violence and squalor.
• Despite enormous death and displacement tolls, the larger international community, unfamiliar with foreign-sounding places like Brampton and Cobourg, and believing Canadians live in igloos anyway, refuses to provide the aid and resettlement support that the United Nations High Commission for Refugees identifies as necessary.

At least, this is what the world might look like if Canada were Syria.

Shannon Gormley is a Canadian journalist based in Istanbul. She writes for the Citizen weekly about global affairs and the state of liberalism around the world. SHE IS A GLOBALIST TRAITOR.

=======

"SO, WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE, VLADDI" (ONE MIGHT ASK)?

Idolatry is the result of fear-focused psychopathy, where the idolater ignores cause and effect to see effects as their own causes.

Their idols are idealized excuses created by "ideologue" criminals in order to avoid their own free-will chosen intentions and culpability in, and guilt for, their own crimes.

Being fear-focused masochists, they not only see "Fear" as a Real Thing which causes pain, and so is to be feared and avoided rather than heeded to avoid similar future pains, but they therefore also actually prefer to pretend to be able to control their own fears, BY causing those very same, worst-case scenario problems (like by attacking innocent others first, whom they accuse of causing them to have fears by thinking about them) which cause the pains they fear the most!

Idealized ideas (idols) are subjectively relativized GENERALIZATIONS, preferably removed (or 'abstracted') from any situational, circumstantial causes and effects.

Therefore, idolaters pretend, for instance, that "War" (and "Crime") are Real Things, 'tragedies' like natural disasters, which simply happen spontaneously without any human intention or actions or even involvements.

Similarly, they believe in "Freedom" and "Liberty" while ignoring the absolute necessity of the implications of having to address the problems of identifying the freedom TO and FROM what, in each and every separate circumstantial situation. Ditto for "Speed;" "Value," and synonyms for same ("Liberty") etc. - without having to reference freedom FROM or TO, WHAT, exactly?! (etc)! Not to mention "Peace!" much less (even worse) "World Peace!"

These are 'emotive' trigger-words, designed to induce emotions (whether good or bad) and avoid thought.

AS IDOLS, THEY ARE USED AS PREDETERMINISTIC EXCUSES FOR NOT HAVING TO EVER LEARN FROM ONE'S MISTAKES, OR AT ALL, BECAUSE WE CAN'T LEARN, BECAUSE "ALLAH" WON'T LET US! OR BECAUSE "HISTORICAL SOCIETAL FORCES" PREVENT US!

The god-level slaver, "Allah," as 'inevitable" force, is their excuse to enjoy freedom from self-restraint.

;-(

It's also why criminal idolaters (lawyers, politicians) prefer to use flowery emotive metaphors (i.e: distractive lies) and the "shit happens," third-person "passive voice" linguistic tense, when speaking.

Thus for a libertine "liberal" psychopath (those who "progress" away from the pains of cause-and-effect category thinking) the solution to "wars in the Middle East" isn't to investigate and ban the causes of those wars, (islam) but to bring every last one of those holy-war-indoctrinated humans responsible for it, from the "war zones" over there, to the lands of "peace" and plenty, here!

The obvious result is that we WILL then predictably BECOME Syria, exactly as the leftopathic masochists want it!

BOTTOM LINE? Their creed orders them to infiltrate and conquer us.
Our creed demands we let our leaders sell our country to them.

Judeo-Christian "THOU SHALT NOT KILL!" won't work vs islam's "THOU SHALT KILL!"

Delinquent fickle treasonous and masochistic libertine "liberal" criminal cowards think the best solution is to become part of the problem!

When all countries are infested with and destroyed by holy-war-prone jihadi "muslims," the globalists will step in to "save" us all from the very problem their paid and owned enemedia presstitutes caused!

Sedition Writ Large

From here:

SANCTUARY CITIES CHOOSE CRIMINALS OVER CITIZENS
City governments vow to protect even violent predators in defiance of Trump administration.

March 29, 2017
By: Joseph Klein 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions warned on Monday that sanctuary jurisdictions risked losing federal grants if they persisted in obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. Billions of dollars in federal law enforcement funding are at stake. "I urge the nation’s states and cities to carefully consider the harm they are doing to their citizens by refusing to enforce our immigration laws," Attorney General Sessions said. "Countless Americans would be alive today and countless loved ones would not be grieving today if these policies of sanctuary cities were ended." 

Instead of heeding the Attorney General’s sound advice and taking care of their own citizens, city officials around the country are planning to sabotage federal law enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws. 

“We are going to become this administration's worst nightmare,” said New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito. On the same day that Attorney General Sessions issued his warning, she hosted a meeting with like-minded officials from other sanctuary cities, including San Francisco, Seattle, Denver, Chicago, and Philadelphia, who prioritize the welfare of illegal immigrants over their own citizens. Ms. Mark-Viverito and her comrades threatened to block access by federal immigration authorities to city property and to city records that could help with the enforcement of the nation's immigration laws. They are acting in the spirit of Alabama’s late Governor George Wallace, who stood in the schoolhouse door to defy federal enforcement of desegregation. 

“The Trump Administration is pushing an unrealistic and mean spirited executive order,” tweeted New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. Spare us the tears, Mr. Mayor. We are not talking about innocent children caught up in vindictive mass deportation sweeps. Rather, President Trump’s so-called “mean-spirited executive order” is intended to rid this country of fiends like Estivan Rafael Marques Velasquez, a gang member from El Salvador with a criminal record, who was released from Rikers Island this year onto the streets of New York before U.S. officers from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) unit could pick him up for deportation proceedings. And there is Luis Alejandro Villegas, 31, who was released from local custody on Dec. 31, 2016, despite a detainer request from ICE. Villegas had previously been removed from the United States and has a prior conviction for forcible theft armed with a deadly weapon. 

"Villegas is a criminal alien who was released back into our New York communities, posing an increased and unnecessary risk to those who live in this great city,” said Thomas R. Decker, field office director for ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations in New York. 

Fortunately, ICE agents were able to catch up with both Velasquez and Villegas on their own and place them into federal custody. If de Blasio has his way, we may not be so lucky next time. In the New York City suburb of Hempstead, two women and a 2-year old girl ran out of luck. A MS-13 street gang member, who had been deported back to El Salvador from the U.S. four times and had a number of prior arrests, stabbed the women and sexually assaulted the little girl. 

Hempstead is in Nassau County, which is a sanctuary jurisdiction. Hempstead’s Mayor Wayne J. Hall, Sr. said last February, "President Trump's recent executive orders go against the moral fiber with which our great nation was built, and I wholeheartedly support New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio and countless other Mayors throughout the United States in denouncing these acts. I, Mayor DeBlasio and leaders from many other communities throughout the country will work together to oppose these executive orders and protect the rights of all people." Good going, Mayor Hall. Now you can explain your opposition to rounding up and deporting illegal aliens with prior criminal records to the illegal aliens' victims in your town, whom you should have been more worried about. 

Chicago’s Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who is presiding over a city beset by rampant crime, reiterated his pledge that Chicago will “continue to welcome” immigrants. “Chicago was built on the back of immigrants and our future is hitched to the wagon of immigrants who come to the city,” he added. Do these include the 45 out of 48 illegal immigrants picked up in a raid last month in the Chicago area who had previously been convicted of crimes, including criminal sexual assault? Twenty of the illegal aliens had returned to the country after have been already deported. In refusing to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement officials, Mayor Emanuel is hitching Chicago’s future in part to criminal illegal aliens who remain free to prey on Chicago’s citizens. 

Challenging the Trump administration’s intention to put an end to sanctuary cities, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said Monday that his city’s policies are “designed to keep our residents safe.” Tell that to the surviving family and friends of the Californian woman killed in a car crash caused by a drunk illegal alien with a long rap sheet, who had been deported previously. Perhaps Mayor Garcetti would do well to listen to the victim’s fiancé, who blamed politicians like himself for the “criminal illegal immigrants that are being harbored here.” Then again, Garcetti, Emanuel, de Blasio and the rest of the sanctuary city crowd are intent on placing their own pro-illegal alien progressive agenda above the safety and welfare of the people they are supposed to serve and protect. 

In Travis County, Texas, Sheriff Sally Hernandez, known as “Sanctuary Sally,” has adopted sanctuary policies for the county in defiance of both federal and Texas state law enforcement. “We can’t have state and elected officials in the state like Sanctuary Sally [Hernandez] down here in Travis County turn a blind eye to releasing illegals that have felony convictions and then wonder what’s going to happen when they get back into general population,” said Texas District 7 Senator Paul Bettencourt. But it may be too late. According to a report issued by ICE on March 20, identifying those sanctuary jurisdictions which released criminal aliens under an immigration detainer, Sanctuary Sally’s county scored the number 1 position. It’s only a matter of time when a released illegal immigrant with felony convictions commits another crime. 

Illegal immigrants in the United States make up approximately 3.5% of the nation’s entire population. According to data compiled from the U.S. Sentencing Commission for fiscal year 2015, illegal immigrants were responsible for 30.2 percent of convictions for kidnapping/hostage taking, 17.8 percent of convictions for drug trafficking, 11.6 percent of convictions for fraud, 10.4 percent of convictions for money laundering, 6.1 percent of convictions for assault, and 5.5 percent of convictions for murder. So much for the myth spread by the pro-illegal immigrant crowd that illegal immigrants commit serious crimes at a much lower rate than U.S.-born citizens. 

Harboring or shielding from detection any alien who “remains in the United States in violation of law” is itself a violation of federal law. It also has real life consequences for the victims of the crimes committed by illegal aliens who are being shielded in sanctuary jurisdictions. Local and state officials who willfully help illegal immigrants evade detention for possible deportation should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. 

Joseph Klein is a Harvard-trained lawyer and the author of Global Deception: The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedom and Lethal Engagement: Barack Hussein Obama, the United Nations & Radical Islam.