Usury Rules

 Stopping fiat "money" and the ability to lend it to EVERYONE - both good AND bad, all the time - would make it harder for evil people to fund their evil wars. Evil people don't create wealth; they only tend to destroy it, so helping them would otherwise make little investment sense, if one had to actually take risks in lending money because the money was actually worth something. 

Don't forget that the Rothschild banksters even lent Hitler money! The plan seems to always be to lend money to all sides in all conflicts (thus also claiming the false excuse of economic neutrality and good business sense, while knowing better: "Always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." — Elie Wiesel) 

So in the end the losers still owe the banksters AND the winners; the winners still owe the banksters, and everyone will also have to take out more loans from those same banksters who had enabled them to destroy them selves, for the inevitable "reconstruction" costs. End results: the banksters end up owning everyone and every thing, so it's always win/win for them, and lose/lost for everyone else. 

Now, while it may be true that not all Jews are banksters, it's even more true that the top banksters are Jews, and they tend to lend the most money to the other evil globalist Jews (not the good ones who oppose them) at zero interest, so they can then use the fake paper to buy up all the natural resources in the world. Goldman-Sachs, for example, just bought up ALL the aluminum futures IN THE WORLD, forever. Further, Using Usury to enslave the rest of world is actually COMMANDED of the Israeli Jews by their god, in their Bible: Deuteronomy 15:5 "Only if thou carefully hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy GOD, to observe to do all these COMMANDMENTS which I COMMAND thee this day." 15:6 "For the Lord thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee." (From the original Hebrew: substitute "enslave," for "reign over")!

Lending money to stupid Goyim who openly state they intend to use it to buy weapons and wage otherwise senseless wars against other Goyim (enabling criminals to kill innocent people for money) shows a certain massive degree of cynicism towards those same Goyim in general. Even if the Jews are right and they are the people chosen by their God to be a light unto the darkness etc., then what they are actually doing is the exact opposite to what they claim to be all about: it's more like letting a chimpanzee or little kid play with a loaded machine gun among other little kids or chimpanzees for the "profit" of only one's own personal entertainment. 

Either that, or the purpose is to control the animals by encouraging them to routinely decimate their own greater populations, and ultimately to enable  them to kill them selves off entirely - no?

;-)

BOTTOM-LINE CONCLUSION:

Jewish banksters seem to want to destroy all the other nations whom they are supposed to have been a "Light Unto" because of the disparate rules those nations' self-contained borders place on their ability to own everyone through the spread of their main official weapon: usury. 

Through sleight of hand, they create "money" out of thin air, which allows them to "buy" (steal) EVERYTHING they want, from almost everyone, all the time! 

Obviously, they don't do it for the money, but for the power of control (slavery) that fake money and the psychological illusion inflicted on the "debtors" through imagined servitude to those owning them.

"Lending" money is to sell money (or at least to rent it out, on the installment plan). But is that really a valid contract, when said money is always actually worthless, and printed out of thin air?! Money used to be tied to other, real commodities like gold, but today's fiat currency isn't officially even loosely based on the main object of worth in this world (oil)!

Fiat money is only based on "Faith!" - and, as usual, (money being the ultimate idolatry) that faith is based on literally NOTHING at all!

Our blind faith that our Jewish money-masters will actually have the right beans counted, and have an economic plan and "system" in place, is shown to have been in fact routinely betrayed whenever their lazy cynicism is exposed as simply lending (selling) their worthless money to everyone all the time, and not even on any rational plan where the risks are assessed evenly along with the potential rewards: for money-lending usury is NOT risk-taking investment at all! 

Usury demands a repayment no matter what, or they own you; but risk-taking investment is a partnership where everyone wins and loses equally, and no one partner automatically ends up owing or owning any of the others! But as so many examples prove, the globalist usurers' failures to plan ARE actually plans to fail, because then they can lever lose, and we can never win (see above)!

Finally: The first duty of the good should be to secure a future for the good by stopping the evil. But when Jewish banksters support both sides - good and evil - equally, then when the good attack the evil, the Jews who support the good will suddenly turn on their clients, in order to protect those of their Jewish brethren who are supporting the evil - which thereby makes all Jews evil, too.

Guilt, Condemnation, and Totalitarian Punishment

From here: 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/guilt-condemnation-and-totalitarian-punishment_3792907.html

We don’t hear much today about the religious doctrine of damnation—the belief that everlasting punishment awaits sinners. How much of that is due to religionists moderating their theological views or simply the ongoing secularization of society is an interesting question.

Regardless, although such harsh judgmentalism may cause uncomfortable tensions between people, it generally is harmless. We have a separation of church and state that, while protecting the free exercise of religion, doesn’t confer the ability of any sect to impose its doctrines forcibly on others. Religionists may condemn us verbally or in their hearts, but they have no power to control or punish us. That’s the Creator’s prerogative, and we’ll just have to wait until we leave this world to see how accurate those bleak pronouncements of damnation are.

There is, however, a doctrine of guilt, condemnation, and punishment that threatens every American’s earthly well-being and happiness. I’m referring to the political left’s fanatical embrace of certain quasi-religious doctrines—specifically, that Americans collectively are guilty of various sins that merit condemnation. The progressive punishment for our sins is to subject us to a stern totalitarian agenda that offers the only salvation from our alleged sins.

In this humanist “religion,” progressives, socialists, pagan environmentalists, et al., have assumed a moral superiority that they believe confers upon them the right to act as judge and jury, to pronounce America and Americans “guilty” of alleged sins and to condemn and punish us by forcing us to submit to their elitist plans.

The form of that punishment—indeed, the only way for us to expiate our “sins” in their eyes—is for us to submit to the progressives’ own radical socialistic central economic plan that offers salvation if we “transform” our society into a progressive utopia. The essence of their all-encompassing central plan is to impose government control over our thought, our speech, and our lives.

Let us briefly review a few of the guilt trips that leftists are using to justify imposing tyrannical measures on the American people to achieve their utopian vision.

1. White Guilt

Epoch Times contributor Larry Elder gave a marvelous talk last week at Principia College during which he powerfully debunked the myth of white guilt. (You can read more in Elder’s book “What’s Race Got to Do with It?” and in his interviews with The Epoch Times. See also Brandon Tatum’s views.)

Leftists seek to impose collective guilt on white Americans—many, both living and dead, who have steadfastly fought for, promoted, and defended racial justice—for the sins of certain white individuals, most of whom have long been dead. Blind to the reality that there are racists among all races, the collective condemnation of an entire race is itself racist. It also illustrates the perversity of “social justice”—collectivist remedies that unjustly trample the rights of innocent individuals.

Trying to punish so-called “white guilt” is also unwise and counterproductive. Once you start trying to indiscriminately punish a whole race of people for the past sins of others, you have opened a Pandora’s box. Think of Israelis and Arabs in the Middle East—the more they try to settle old scores, the more the present generation suffers. Do we want our children to shoulder the same burden of hatred, injustice, and violence that so devastated the lives of our ancestors, or can we love them enough to break the cycle of conflict? (Indeed, imagine what a hostile place the world would be if white Americans were to seek vengeance against the descendants of the often cruel and unjust oppressions of their own ancestors.)

2. Success Guilt

Dennis Prager wrote about this just last week. Both Jews and Americans have shared a cultural history that was to a considerable degree shaped by their religious faith in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Both of these related cultures have achieved outstanding success relative to other societies and cultures in the world. Sadly, success has triggered the envy, resentment, and hatred of many who were born into societies where those cultural values and the success they tend to spawn have been absent. How dare those Jews and Americans accomplish so much! They must be punished for such effrontery.

3. Capitalist Guilt

Prager alluded to this, too, in his column. Anti-capitalism has been around for nearly two centuries—ever since capitalist entrepreneurs found ways to lift the masses of people out of poverty. The great Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises published a book titled “The Anti-Capitalist Mentality” in 1956 in which he diagnosed the feelings of inferiority that anti-capitalist intellectuals struggle with. Many of these highly educated intellectuals just can’t stand seeing the masses of people richly reward entrepreneurs who serve their needs and desires while at the same time placing relatively little value on the intellectuals’ abstract philosophies and academic ideologies. Billionaires (unless they’re pigging out with government subsidies) are society’s benefactors. They deserve our gratitude, not our hostility.

The anti-rich-people animus stems from gross economic ignorance, such as persistent belief in the long-defunct 16th-century Montaigne dogma, which falsely asserted that one man’s gain is another’s loss. More than two centuries of capitalist history have shattered that fallacy.

4. Profit Guilt

Indeed, as even Karl Marx understood, capitalism excels at producing wealth, and yet Marx and his followers today decry the profit-making process that has made possible today’s unprecedented wealth for an unprecedented number of people.

It’s tragic that so many Americans don’t understand two crucial aspects of profits: First, profits are new wealth; the only way for a society to get richer is through the production of additional value—value that is signaled by profits. Second, because entrepreneurs in a capitalist system compete to best serve the people’s wants, while businesses in socialist systems have to produce what their political rulers—a socialist society’s elite—command. Obviously, people are going to be better off when production is oriented toward their preferences than the government plan’s dictates.

5. Prosperity Guilt

A core value of today’s environmentalism is the misanthropic and incredibly wrong belief that human prosperity is an evil that will render Earth uninhabitable. These ideologues are ignorant of the environmental “Kuznets curve.” It’s a total myth that the more prosperous people get, the more polluted their environment gets. The way the world really works is that after an initial increase of pollution as poor societies climb out of subsistence standards of living, the increasing wealth of those societies enables them to direct wealth and effort to the cause of environmental protection. The felicitous result is that economically advanced countries pollute less than developing countries.

Alas, so fanatical are greens in their belief in the evil of humanity that they remain willfully blind to two great environmental blessings that have come to the present generation: First, that temperatures have modestly risen above the grimly cold Little Ice Age, making life safer; second, that the CO2 enrichment of Earth’s atmosphere over the past century has produced a huge greening of the planet. We should celebrate, not mourn, but the funereal guilt-mongers want us to mourn.

Condemnation

So, here’s the upshot of all the guilt trips that leftists are foisting on us: In the grip of their beliefs—their fanatical, unquestioning faith in the guilt of the American people for the above-listed “offenses”—the left condemns all who dare to dissent from their catechism. We dissidents are, ipso facto, bad people; thus, we deserve to suffer and be punished for our sins.

There’s no nuance in the leftists’ thinking, no mitigating factors, no sense of context; non-leftists are wrong—period. Consequently, the United States gets no credit for the considerable progress we have made and continue to make. Instead, we’re deemed guilty because we haven’t yet fully realized our ideals. As I’ve written before, to leftists, the perfect has become the mortal enemy of the good.

If, by the way, you object to my characterization of leftists as “fanatical,” perhaps “messianic” would be a more appropriate adjective. Think of Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) who, when unveiling the grand socialist central economic plan known as “the Green New Deal,” described the proposal as “a mission to save all of creation.” All of creation?! If that isn’t messianic, then nothing is. Be aware of how often leftists use the religious language of salvation. Often when they promote their vision, they assert that their policies are necessary to “save” us—and tragically often, to save us from imaginary problems (e.g., wealth, success, a greening world, etc.).

This messianic zeal has congealed into a hatred of conservatives, libertarians, Republicans—literally any American who dissents from the leftist agenda. The left has become a Leninist movement, embracing hatred of their political opponents with all the fervor that Lenin himself mustered.

Totalitarian Punishment

The hatred that the left feels toward their political opponents is manifest in their aggressive attempts to obliterate, destroy, and smash those opponents by canceling and silencing them. It’s seen in their blatant effort to do an end-run around democracy by resorting to such machinations as D.C. statehood, packing the Supreme Court, dictating election rules to states, ramming through legislation with zero opposition input or support, etc.

Under the intoxicating influence of what I’ve termed “the three meta-errors” of progressivism (faith in government competence, belief in human willpower, and the tyranny of good intentions), the left feels perfectly justified in arrogating totalitarian powers to themselves. They may call it “democratic socialism,” but it’s anything but democratic.

Like Marx, Lenin, and other past socialist revolutionaries, today’s left believes that the end justifies the means. They seem to have convinced themselves that by dictating a radical top-down central plan on the American people, the result will be a bright, utopian future. Don’t hold your breath.

If you want to find the utopia that the left desires, go to Washington, D.C., take a hard left, and look for it between the unicorn farm and Atlantis. No radical social plan animated by hatred for people and based on mutilations of truth can possibly bless the human race. If you need to see it in black and white, check out “The Black Book of Communism”—communism being the end of the road that Marx said starts with democracy and passes through socialism. The human race has suffered enough from the socialist/communist virus.

To advocate socialism today can only be explained by a rejection of reason and an adherence to a secular faith that elevates hope over experience. The fanatical adherents of this quasi-religious dogma, having judged American society guilty of cardinal sins, have condemned us to a state-imposed hell that’s becoming increasingly totalitarian by the day.

The good news is: We Americans are not guilty of the sins with which the left has charged us. There is, then, no justification for condemnation and no need for the totalitarian agenda that they’re pushing. As has ever been the case, America and Americans will flourish if we remain free of dictatorial government plans and controls.

Mark Hendrickson, an economist, recently retired from the faculty of Grove City College, where he remains a fellow for economic and social policy at the Institute for Faith and Freedom.

Where Can You Send Your Children to University?

Where Can You Send Your Children to University?

From here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/where-can-you-send-your-children-to-university_3780573.html

(This article was way too good to let the Epoch Times post alone LOL)!

"Liberal arts education, as I experienced it at Antioch College in the late 1950s and early 1960s, was aimed at opening students’ minds to the intellectual life of Western culture.

Students were asked to consider such questions as “What counts as a good life?”, “How do people’s ideas and actions differ from place to place and time to time?”, “What is the basis of social life?”, “Do people have free will or is life determined?”, “Where does wealth come from?”, “Is science different from other belief systems?”, “What is beauty?”, “Who should govern?”, and many others engaged with literature, languages, and science.

Liberal arts education relied on academic values derived from the Enlightenment. These are openness in the search for truth, merit-based selection of personnel, and academic freedom for diversity of thought. These values are based on, as Gad Saad puts it, “the defining ethos of the West, namely the unfettered commitment to the pursuit of truth.” Both merit-based selection of personnel and freedom for diversity of thought are structural conditions for the search for truth, as both are required for a fruitful exchange and competition of ideas in an intellectual marketplace.

During the past four decades, liberal arts education was canceled, and is now deceased. Postmodernism assassinated the idea of “truth,” claiming that all knowledge is subjective and that each person has “my truth.” Critical theory imposed the definitive and final answer to social and political questions in terms of Marx’s class conflict theory, with the creative modification of racial, gender, and sexuality classes being the actors in oppression and victimhood. Feminists disposed of Western culture and civilization as the patriarchal work of “dead white men.” Goodbye, Homer and Shakespeare and all of Western literature, Bach and Beethoven and all of Western music (except Clara Schumann), Rembrandt and Renoir and all of Western painting (except, of course, Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt).

Race activists have rejected the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution as the work of “slave owners,” and the entire country as “systemically racist.” Race-baiters at The New York Times, once a serious newspaper, declared that America was from its foundation about slavery and has been about anti-black racism ever since, and never about anything else. America has been duly canceled. Canada, weak on slavery, is deemed strong on “colonialism” and utterly worthless. Liberal arts education was, as we have now been informed, always a lie in aid of patriarchal and white supremacist oppression.

With neo-Marxist “social justice” ideology having answered all important questions, not only is further inquiry redundant, but also any alternative point of view, criticism, or objection is forbidden as “white male supremacism” and “violence” against “marginalized, racialized, and underserved populations,” who “feel unsafe” and traumatized if they hear opinions that do not support “social justice” ideology. Thus, freedom of speech and academic freedom are totally canceled. Diversity of thought and opinion is deemed reactionary, fascist, Nazi, and evil.

Education today, in universities and in schools under the guidance of universities, is all about overthrowing the patriarchy and white supremacism and replacing males with females, and whites with people of color, preferably lesbians and transsexuals of color. There’s no longer a need to ask all of those obscure liberal arts questions, for we now have all of the virtuous answers. We know how society was constituted as oppressive, and how it will be reconstituted as virtuous. We know who is worth listening to and emulating—females and people of color—and who must be marginalized—males and whites.

This replacement, apparent for example in the demography of all universities, has been conducted under the slogan “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” which means fewer men and whites (with the exception of the preferred illegal aliens), and more females and people of color. Today, it’s males and whites who are “underrepresented,” which is exactly what was hoped for by the “woke.”

What’s the Choice?

With liberal arts education no longer available in “woke” anti-male and anti-white universities, what options are available for high school graduates?

Higher education has for decades been seen in North America as the path to economic and social success. Parents have sacrificed to send their children to college and university. Even if they know how corrupt higher education has become, they wouldn’t be willing to deprive their offspring of the advantages alleged to follow from graduation.

So, for the, say, 90 percent of parents who are not Marxists, radical feminists, anti-white racists, and science deniers, what can they do for their children?

Above all, don’t let your children enroll in “studies” courses—feminist, black, ethnic, “Latinx,” queer, trans, and whatever new “victim” they come up with next. Unless you want your children to learn race and gender hatred, hatred of their country, and hatred of Western civilization, and want them to have as their occupational destiny fast food outlets and coffee houses, avoid these “woke” programs.

In the social sciences, anthropology, sociology, and political science used to be serious academic subjects but are now devoted to lies, such as that blacks are at more risk of death from police rather than from the black criminals who in reality take most of their lives, that statistical disparities are proof of discrimination rather than differential preferences and capabilities, and that men can become women and women can become men.

The humanities are much the same and should be avoided. Don’t imagine that English literature is taught in English departments anymore. They would not sink to teaching “dead white men.” English departments are now all “woke” cultural studies, which probably explains why enrollment has plummeted. History has now become “people’s” history, with special emphasis on the “oppressed.” Its enrollment has also plummeted. Even language programs are no longer about teaching language but about “social justice.” Avoid at all costs the social sciences and humanities.

It may be hard to believe, but education and social work are more radical. Education faculties are dedicated to bringing race and gender hatred into the schools.

Only the hard sciences, engineering, and mathematics have maintained some academic content, although the departments themselves struggle with the “diversity, equity, and inclusion” mandates imposed on them. So, STEM would be the only programs that would be worthwhile for your children. Oh, but not biology, which has been canceled by transgender activists and their enablers throughout society, and who will cancel your children should they believe in biology.

There’s another option (thank you, David Leis): higher education in technical fields, at polytechnic institutions such as British Columbia Institute of Technology in Vancouver, Manitoba Institute of Trades and Technology, Algonquin College in Ottawa, and Dawson College in Montreal. In the United States, the reputation of the multitude of polytechnic universities is set by the California Institute of Technology and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Wisdom, once sought in the liberal arts, must now be sought elsewhere."

Philip Carl Salzman is professor emeritus of anthropology at McGill University, senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, fellow at the Middle East Forum, and president of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.

The Destructive "CHURCH OF WOKE" Fully Exposed

 The "CHURCH OF WOKE" is based on SELF-HATING COWARDICE. "Psychotic," (Greek for "thought-killing") habitual HYPOCRITES hate them selves first, for having already been weak and Submitted to external threats in the past - they feel ashamed and the pain of guilt and remorseful fear, but have no way to reverse time to correct their cowardice. So they try to get revenge on 'The Universe' by lying and tempting and otherwise forcing other people to Submit to fear, too ("misery loves company") and in only that way can they then hope to console them selves by pretending that their past Submission was always really only "perfectly natural" (i.e: "inevitable" forces, and so, not ever their fault) "Because you all" (i.e: everyone else) always did and still do it, too! Whee!"

So: Cowardly hypocrites hate brave honesty! They are jealous of those bravely honest and self-reliant people's free-will choices to refuse to Submit, because those peoples' existence proves the hypocrites' own past decisions to Submit were NOT inevitable but cowardly CHOICES. And THAT realization rekindles all their previous painful guilty fears about their own cowardly selves! The existence of bravely honest people, whom the hypocrites KNOW ARE better than them, cannot be tolerated as long as they hope to maintain their own default go-to baseline set-points of hypocrisy, where no matter what the real-world cause-and-effect, attack-vs-defense objective sequential facts may be, they hold that they are always equally helpless but righteously heroic fellow victims, who are always entitled to the right to everyone else's pity and acclaim, without having any responsibility to earn or prove it; while everyone who dares to reject that lie, must be their wrongfully villainous oppressors, entitled to no right to defend them selves from the hypocrites' slanders, but having only the responsibility to become and remain their slave for their "hateful" lack of pity and acclaim!

So, this is how the POLITICS AND RELIGION OF "WOKE" ARE SUSTAINED:

Libertine "liberal" criminals are all hypocrites - paranoid masochists who pretend they don't believe in free-will choice, and therefore also not in criminal intent, criminality, crimes, or criminals.

Here's how ALL the so-called "soft" sciences aka "humanities" (anthropology, psychology, sociology, and even Law or criminology) really work: They all started off by examining the various symptoms and EFFECTS of human behavior, thinking, group-thinking behavior, and of criminal free-will CHOICES, respectively, but then self-invalidated by looking for hidden mysterious predestined and predetermined inevitable force "CAUSES" of it all, which degraded them all into only one criminal, excuse-making alibi topic:

"VICTIMOLOGY!"

So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles:

*Law-abiding Conservatives: "Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!"*

*Criminal libertines: "But what CAUSED that choice? There's always a cause!"*

Their implication, like the "That tree hit my car!" excuse, is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we're always all "victims."

In short: they went from studying HOW people CHOOSE to act, to focusing on WHY (ruling out free will choice entirely)!

That's why they want to legalize all crimes, defund the police, and empty all the prisons.

And therefore also, hadn't you heard?!

Being constructively angry at ("hateful" towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while uselessly pitying ("tolerating") them all as "equally-helpless fellow victims," is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, criminals must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking - through an emotional, sub-conscious "narrative" - so much so, that the only advice we hear from "our" hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

"Anyone who doesn't automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!"

Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a "hateful" crime itself!

Beyond that, this is the RELIGION OF "WOKE:"

"Everyone must be "WOKE" up to the 'obvious fact' that everything that ever goes wrong is always the fault of Straight White Males - Every Single Time! Because obviously, they are in general larger, stronger, faster and smarter (more competitively evolved to succeed) than non-straight gays, non-White People Of Color, and non-male WXMXN, so every time the latter fails at anything it can't be simply because they are generally smaller, weaker, slower and dumber than the former, but because the latter must have been somehow so fearful of their inferiors that they decided to take time out from their busy days of literally minding their own businesses to dream up ever-new creative ways to "oppress" (confuse) them with, such as "logic," "facts," "science," and "truth!" due to their natural "homophobic," "racist," "sexism," respectively! So combating this obviously inherent, "systemically engineered" social injustice with "woke" progressivism, is the duty of all shallow-thinking pre-judiced and biased anti-White bigots! Whee!" 

Or something like that.

But of course it's all "projection," because "Those that can't do, teach (others how to help them slander extort and enslave those who CAN do")! It's Takers vs Makers!

And, while no amount of tax money thrown, or government force imposed, will ever be able to make the races or sexes "equal," the very act of pretending to have to try to do so will lucratively enrich countless generations of politicians and their backers (and maybe even some of their followers!) forever, because their motto always was, still is, and always will be: "There's No Money In Solutions, so: Please Give Generously - AGAIN!"

;-)

Bottom line: "Wokeness" requires you wallow in your victimhood.
If you refuse to label yourself a victim, you are their enemy.

BUT MEANWHILE, BACK HERE IN REALITY ...

Whites, being superior and knowing it (guilty White liberals included) can't play the victim; at most, they can only pretend to champion the non-Whites' extortion attempts in order to personally treasonously gain power over their fellow Whites.

Unfortunately for the non-traitor, "illiberal" rest of us, to even defend our selves against these extortionists, makes us seem like nasty bullies picking on our mentally-crippled inferiors.

The enemy relies on the same old paranoid masochist claims routinely used by criminal hypocrites all the time:

"Since only you COULD have oppressed us, (by dint of your implied but never dared-to-be-spoken-aloud obvious mental superiority over us) and we say we feel oppressed, therefore you DID oppress us and so you also now owe us reparations for having oppressed us - CAPISCE?"

Well, the only valid, brutally truthful response MUST now be:

"NO. You're failures because, relatively, you suck! You're smaller weaker slower and less savvy than we are, which is the only reason we so-often succeed while you usually fail!"

So, while telling that simple truth would indeed only serve to further enrage our inferiors, while making us look very un-sympathetically like arrogant bullies who deserve to get further extorted anyways, there still has to be a limit, before these piecemeal niggling extortion attempts become full-blown and organized, global slavery directed against us all!

See also:

https://summit.news/2021/05/05/roger-daltrey-the-woke-generation-is-creating-a-miserable-world/

https://sheikyermami.com/2021/05/the-coming-race-war-2/

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1236678427904524288

Will leftists and globalists successfully disarm Americans?

 From Brandon Smith of Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty

The reasons why leftists and globalists will never successfully disarm Americans

Gun confiscation has always been the Holy Grail of totalitarian regimes.  And though it is true that not every regime seeks to disarm every single citizen, they always disarm the people they specifically intend to hurt the most.

For example, gun control advocates today like to point out that the Third Reich in Germany did not disarm the entire German population. This is a rather bizarre position for leftists as they continually wail and scream about Nazis around every corner and behind every tree, but they will still defend their gun-grabbing policies by arguing that the Nazis were not as bad as conservatives assume. Of course, what they never mention is that the Nazis DID disarm millions of people; most of them Jewish under 1938 German gun laws.

The National Socialists disarmed the people they planned to destroy. It's not hard to figure out why; they didn't want their target to be able to fight back. They allowed their political supporter to keep their weapons legally; this is not a relaxation of gun laws, in fact, it's the reverse — it is selective enforcement of gun confiscation based on ideological loyalty.

Hilariously, leftists in the U.S. when confronted with this fact double down on their gun control arguments instead of admitting their foolish error. They will say: "Yes, the Nazis disarmed the Jews and others, but having guns would have made no difference in saving their lives..." And there you have it — the most backward circular logic of all time. If Jews and others owning guns was not a deterrent to their slaughter, then why would the Nazis bother disarming them in the first place?  Leftists have no answer to this question.

Not to mention they are trying to argue against facts using a hypothetical; how would they know? Maybe owning guns might have saved the lives of millions of people the Nazis had deemed enemies of the state?  Maybe it would have acted as a deterrent to the Holocaust? Maybe the Nazis would have been afraid to expand tyranny into Europe if they had to worry about their own population fighting back?  Maybe, WWII would have never happened?  We could argue hypotheticals all day long...

What we do know for certain is that disarmament is always one of the first steps by totalitarians in cementing their control of a population, and this most common among the biggest political killers in modern history — no, it's not the Nazis; it's the communists.

While a debate rages over the exact number of deaths attributed to communist governments, it is estimated that they are responsible for approximately 65 million to 100 million murders over the course of the last century, a genocide beyond anything history has ever seen before. These deaths were caused by direct means, such as shooting dissidents, or indirect means, such as imprisoning dissidents until they died from complications or stealing food supplies from rural farming communities and allowing them to starve en masse.

Stalin, in particular, declared any theft of state property a crime punishable by death. He then also declared that all production including food production was state property. So, if you eat food that was not granted to you by the state, you are stealing and could therefore be shot. See how that works?

None of this would have been possible without gun control and confiscation laws put in place before the larger genocide was enacted. In 1918 the Bolsheviks and the Council of the People's Commissar mandated that Russian citizens turn in their firearms under penalty of prosecution. Gun restrictions and penalties were increased over the years until WWII, when the Soviets were loath to arm their own population in response to Nazi invasion. In fact, the ease by which the Nazi army rolled through the Eastern front was partly due to the disarmament of the Russian population.

Communist governments only allow people to have firearms in their hands when they are fighting against the ideological and foreign foes of the regime. You are allowed to be cannon fodder for the elites, you are not allowed the means to defend yourself from those same elites.

Americans (primarily conservative Americans) have an in-depth understanding of this dynamic. While leftists are more concerned with rewriting history to their benefit, we are more concerned with learning from it. We know where gun control leads, and so did the Founding Fathers of our nation, which is why they codified gun ownership into the U.S. Constitution as an inalienable right under the 2nd Amendment. Here are the reasons why elitists, globalists and communists will never be able to disarm the American population as they have done in previous nations...

We know the history of gun control

As noted above, we have studied the history of tyrants. There is no tyranny that has ever existed that did not try to disarm the population or disarm the portion of the population the government intended to enslave or destroy. Leftists froth at the mouth trying to re-imagine history in a way that circumvents or ignores the tyranny issue when it comes to gun control. They are wasting their time.

They are never going to convince conservatives and moderates that gun confiscation was not a key step in the establishment of various tyrannies in modern history. All the mental gymnastics and manipulation, all the energy they spend trying to rationalize away genocide as somehow "inevitable" regardless of gun rights — it's all for nothing. We are far smarter than they are. We are well versed in the legacy of gun control, and this makes their tactics useless.

We know all the tricks

The level of dishonesty involved in gun control advocacy is astonishing. Leftists use lies as a means to gain political capital; if they were completely honest about their intentions they would not receive much support from the general population for their efforts. Gun grabbers are very careful in most cases to use phrases like "common sense" when talking about new restrictions. They try to refrain from admitting what they really want is complete disarmament, at least, until recently.

Incrementalism was the name of the game, but the past year they are going for broke. Some leftist politicians are openly admitting their true goals because frankly the song and dance weren't working, and they know conservatives aren't going to allow any further encroachment on their rights. Kamala Harris, now vice president of the U.S., was one of the Democrats openly seeking mandatory government buybacks of firearms.

Joe Biden is famous for his statements admonishing military-grade weapons in civilian hands and telling people that a "double-barreled shotgun" is "superior" to the AR-15 for home defense. Obviously, a two-shot weapon with a limited effective range of around 50 yards or less makes it very difficult to fight back against government tyranny. And we all know that eventually even the shotguns would be taken away.

There is a reason why leftists and globalists are so obsessed with taking away combat-ready firearms from Americans, and it's not about "saving lives."  These weapons act as a deterrent to full-blown tyranny. As long as they exist, our ability to take back our other rights and freedoms exist.

BLM race riots

Despite the false claims of the mainstream media, we have seen firsthand the destruction and insanity perpetrated by Marxist groups like Black Lives Matter. They are anything but "peaceful." They are dangerous in their lack of intelligence and logic, and their social justice ideology is cancer that infects and debilitates every vital organ of Western civilization.

In his movie Platoon, Oliver Stone's character Chris Taylor says: "Hell is the impossibility of reason." If this doesn't describe the social justice movement today then I don't know what does. If a group of people is determined to make every single tragedy about racism and "white supremacy" despite all facts to the contrary, and then use those tragedies as an excuse for mass violence, then they are zealots, and zealots are dangerous. They are cultists with a mission, and they will do anything to accomplish that mission.

In this case, the mission of Marxists within BLM is to destroy the very fabric of America, burn it to the ground, and then rebuild it into an unrecognizable husk devoid of principles or freedom. Yeah, I don't think conservative gun owners are going to go along with that. Burning down their own neighborhoods is one thing, but I have little doubt they will ultimately try to spread beyond the borders of their own garbage cities. And, when they do, we will be there to put an end to it.

The control agenda is out in the open

If anything has convinced gun owners of the need for firearms, it has been the past year of pandemic fear-mongering. What have we learned so far?  Well, we are now fully aware of the "Great Reset" agenda, which has been promoted nonstop by the World Economic Forum and various political leaders. This agenda calls for years of economic lockdowns and medical mandates, forced vaccination, medical passports without which a person might be completely removed from the economy, a new cashless society, a shared economy in which you will "own nothing and like it."

The medical or vaccine "passports" are particularly disconcerting. For one, governments don't necessarily have to enforce them right away. Rather, they can simply allow their corporate partners to demand said passports from anyone that wants to get a job or buy a shop in their stores. Once this system is ingrained into the consumer world, governments can then step in and make them a legal requirement. Eventually, the passports give the establishment the ability to control and micro-manage every aspect of every individual life. Without compliance to every whim, the technocrats can simply void your passport, and then you die from poverty and starvation.

This would be impossible to do in a country where a majority of the population is armed. I think it's safe to say most Americans do not want to live in the dystopian world that the globalists at the WEF envision, and we will fight to ensure it does not happen.

Tyranny is enforced by armed men on the ground 

My favorite mantra of gun grabbers is the claim that "Your AR-15 isn't going to help you against an Abrams tank or a predator drone."  These people don't understand how totalitarian systems function. In order to control a population, you have to have loyal troops on the ground... everywhere. Not only that, but you also need loyal civilians, a large percentage of the population, to act as your eyes and ears and sometimes brute force. And finally, you need anyone who might oppose you to be afraid to take action to defend themselves. You need them docile and passive.

There are a lot of moving parts to tyranny, and tanks and planes are secondary to basic manpower. And where there are troops and others enforcing tyranny, there are numerous targets. Where there are firearms, there is a means to eliminate a tyrant at the top of the pyramid with a single well-placed bullet. Furthermore, you don't need armored vehicles and stealth jets to fight tyranny; what you need is a good firearm to remove the people driving and flying those machines. You might even take those weapons for your own arsenal.

A lot of gun owners are also military veterans, and they have seen how things played out in places like Afghanistan, where all the military might in the world was ineffective against tribesman with old AK-47s and roadside IEDs. It's about the force of will, and a minimal ability to attack when necessary. Guerrilla wars are not fought in terms of battles, they are fought in terms of attrition. Americans understand this better than most.

For all these reasons and more, the gun grabber ethos is essentially pointless. They can have total dominance in the federal government, they could have every state government on their side and pass hundreds of laws and executive orders making every gun owner a criminal, and it still would not matter. We will not budge; we would rather fight.

Elitists and leftists just don't seem to get it. Maybe it's the way their brains work. Maybe they just can't comprehend the idea that some people will not compromise certain freedoms no matter the cost. They think everyone has a limit; that everyone has a price. They think anyone can be bought, or that anyone can be leveraged into submission. The truth is some of can't. Some of us have no price, and we cannot be compelled to comply.

We are the people that keep freedom alive, and totalitarians are terrified of us; gun-grabbing is merely a natural extension of their fear and doubt. Wherever a government is seeking to disarm the population, this is a sure sign they are afraid that the population might take away their power.

To truth and knowledge,

Brandon Smith

Thanks to Western Corporations in League with China, MINORITY-REPORT PRE-CRIME Tech is Already Here!

Spies, spies everywhere — here's what to do 

Almost anything can be sold to the American public in the interest of personal safety. People will seemingly surrender all their rights if someone in authority can convince them it will keep them safe.

Politicians and bureaucrats use crime as an excuse for its massive surveillance apparatus. Video surveillance is a fact of modern life. In China, they are even using video to clue in to your emotional state as part of your "social credit score" there.

Worse, as China Digital Times reports, "A new report from The Intercept's Mara Hvistendahl uncovers how U.S. software giant Oracle worked with Chinese law enforcement to supply analytics software for China's burgeoning surveillance state. At the same time, other reports have revealed how Chinese manufacturers of surveillance equipment are widely supplying governments and companies in the West."

Cameras are more prevalent in Europe than in the U.S., but even here, your activities are likely being recorded by somebody, somewhere dozens of times every day. Estimates are there are more than 30 million surveillance cameras deployed in the U.S. shooting more than 4 billion hours of footage every week.

Every time you use an ATM machine, go into any government building, drive the streets, go through a toll booth, buy a snack at a convenience store, purchase certain over-the-counter medications at a drugstore, try your luck at a casino, browse at a shopping mall or even just stroll down the sidewalk, your picture is being taken and/or your actions are being recorded in a database. Stores are capturing your visage as you shop, pairing your face with your email address and your computer browser, and then sending you ads for the items you looked at in the stores.

Some surveillance cameras are so powerful they can read your text messages from more than 800 feet away. And they record not just your image but everything you say.

Governments justify video surveillance as a tool to prevent crime, improve traffic safety, deter fraud and catch terrorists. Companies and employers justify video spying for security reasons and to keep an eye on employee activities. Private individuals install spycams to see who's at the door and to monitor their property.

Amazon, which is partially funded by the government and collects data for the government, took it one step further via its Ring doorbell division. This is a smart doorbell that uses the camera to monitor a user's neighborhood with facial recognition technology and report suspicious activity to authorities. Amazon even wants to license this "Rekognition" technology to government for mass surveillance — to spy on people simply walking down the street. After all, Keith Alexander — a retired four-star U.S. Army general and former National Security Agency director who infamously lied about the federal government's mass surveillance program — joined the board of Amazon.

Certainly, personal cameras make excellent deterrents to keep criminals from your property. And they serve as great weapons to secure convictions in cases of criminal activity. But should citizens partner with government to grow the massive spying apparatus?

That's exactly what's happening in a number of cities across the country through a program called SafeCam. Participants in the program select cameras and monitoring systems from certain vendors and opt for their "public-facing cameras" into the program. The live video feeds then automatically go to the city's central monitoring center.

In essence, people are setting up a system that allows government to spy on them and their neighbors 24/7. People used to fear the idea of "Big Brother" watching whatever they do. Now they are inviting Big Brother onto their property.

And since we live in a massive welfare state, anyone who can't afford his own cameras and doesn't want to be left out of view of the government's prying eyes can get a "free" government camera.

The idea of government using its massive surveillance apparatus to solve crimes can seem palatable if we trusted that the government has our best interests at heart and there weren't ne'er-do-wells and sociopaths inhabiting the halls of power.

Meanwhile, technology is being advanced that purports to be able to make a risk assessment of someone based on his eyes or the sound of his voice. This is the essence of pre-crime: Making a person a criminal before he commits a criminal act based on the possibility he may commit a crime as determined by algorithms. It certainly spells the end of any pretense at due process.

We know from experience that government is at war with us. The fact that most Americans are totally oblivious to all-out war against them doesn't change a thing. Governments always silently make war on their own citizens behind a propaganda front so as to alert as few people as possible. The less resistance the better.

Benevolent totalitarianism is not an inherent contradiction or an oxymoron. It is a political system of persuasion in which the people are manipulated against their self-interest.

Every action of government is psychological coercion, however concealed, to transfer more and more wealth and authority to the system.

Crime is a means or excuse for regimentation. Law and order is the pretense. Regimentation of honest working people is the result.

For years I have been warning about the growing police state and the rise of benevolent totalitarianism, and those warnings have often been greeted with charges of fear-mongering or tin foil-hattery.

But America is on life support, and government men know this. Unless the leviathan government is torn down to its Constitutional foundation, the country will rip itself apart. It may well be too late to prevent it.

The government, through its alphabet soup agencies and its surveillance apparatus, are terrorizing the American people. Terrorizing by government cannot survive against a well-armed citizenry. That is why the elected class has pushed so hard to disarm the populace and why the surveillance state is being expanded at breakneck speed.

It's part of the globalists' plans. According to the projections of the WEF's "Global Future Councils," privacy will be abolished during the next decade.

Be sure that you understand that the government thinks that you and your property are their business. Often those in power think they are entitled to what you have. Bureaucrats don't like the word privacy. Can you guess why? 

Information on citizens is absolutely essential to governments. The business of government is information on its citizens. Read this over and over. You must understand the implications.

Low-profile living should be your rule. You must already know not to drive a Mercedes on a Chevrolet income. The reason is that the IRS sometimes computes a "net worth" assessment of taxes if they think your standard of living (i.e., what you display) is greater than your income.

Don't disclose any more than you need to, ever. All government agencies are tied directly to the IRS through their computer.

You must also know that although cash is private, the government is trying to do away with cash so that you and your income and spending can be tracked precisely. Credit cards are convenient, and you are offered endless "rewards" to use them, but information about your credit is scattered around the world with total disregard for your privacy. Many people receive several solicitations a week to apply for a new credit card. How do you think the credit card company discovered you might be a good prospect for a new credit card?

When you want to do a transaction and keep it private and out of bank records, consider doing it in cash despite how inconvenient the government wants to make it. Also consider bartering or trade of goods and services, with no record except your handshake. The reason? Governments don't like cash. They are suspicious of cash transactions. Their excuse is the drug trade. What they really want is to control you. So as long as what you are doing is not illegal, you can still do small, private cash transactions and not violate any Treasury reporting rules.

There is no privacy on the Internet! The world's most popular websites are tracking and recording your keystrokes, mouse movements, scrolling behaviors and the pages you visit. This puts your most sensitive information at risk.

A study conducted by Princeton University's Web Transparency and Accountability Project discovered that popular sites like Microsoft, Adobe, WordPress, Godaddy, Spotify, Skype, Samsung and Rotten Tomatoes are using scripts that capture the data and send it to third parties. All told, 482 of the 50,000 most-viewed sites are using the session replay scripts. Among the information grabbed includes passwords, credit card information and medical information.

Researcher Steven Englehardt, a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton, told DailyMail.com, "Unlike typical analytics services that provide aggregate statistics, these scripts are intended for the recording and playback of individual browsing sessions, as if someone is looking over your shoulder... This may expose users to identity theft, online scams and other unwanted behavior."

Although this is a scary situation, to say the least, you can do something more about it. There is no such thing as freedom without privacy. There is no such thing as privacy unless you use your freedom to make it happen. Privacy and freedom are inseparable concepts. We live in an information society. It follows that we have no freedom left if we do not restrict, impede and stop creating that information by freely giving out information.

"Our" congress has legislated our privacy away. They have thus legislated our freedom away. If you are to have any privacy, it will be up to you and you alone. Admittedly, being private is not convenient nor easy.

Try your best to keep your records private. If you must show a document to your lawyer or accountant, you go personally with the papers and return with the papers.

Stay away from lawyers, accountants, and courts as much as possible. If you can settle out of court, try to do so every time, whether as a plaintiff or defendant. Use private or even public arbitration services and arbitration judges instead.

Get prepared forms and do your own legal work. Most lawyers have their secretaries fill out these forms anyway and charge for "professional" legal work.

As long as most people don't feel any direct threat, they relax and let the system run their lives. But if something happens, such as a lawsuit or a serious IRS field audit or even a criminal investigation, your life can become a nightmare overnight. In this way, the government destroys people and families one by one, like sitting ducks. It can strip you of everything you have ever worked for and own. It is true that everything that you say or otherwise reveal about yourself can and will be used against you. Learn low-profile living!

Yours for the truth,

Bob Livingston
Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter®

P.S. — My staff and I have created a way to alert you as to just how far the government has gone to steal your privacy and compiled some of the best ways to get it back and counter government surveillance operations. You can get the eBook The Ultimate Privacy Guide here.