From Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty:

Facebook creates communist China-style citizen rating system

Posted on August 21, 2018 by Personal Liberty News Desk

88 Shares

Facebook has implemented a new “trustworthiness score” that judges the credibility of its users and helps determine whether the content they post and share or flag as “fake news” is problematic or viable.

The previously-unreported ratings system that has been in place for more than a year just recently came to light. Tessa Lyons, Facebook’s product manager who is in charge of fighting “disinformation,” said the new system creates a score based on, among other things, how people interact with articles that show up in their feeds.

“For example, if someone previously gave us feedback that an article was false and the article was confirmed false by a fact-checker, then we might weight that person’s future false-news feedback more than someone who indiscriminately provides false-news feedback on lots of articles, including ones that end up being rated as true,” Lyons told the Washington Post. “I like to make the joke that, if people only reported things that were false, this job would be so easy! People often report things that they just disagree with.”

Lyons would not go into more detail about other criteria the social media platform uses in creating its “trustworthiness score,” or whether all users are scored and what ways the scores are used, claiming releasing that information would subject the system to gaming by malicious actors.

“Not knowing how [Facebook is] judging us is what makes us uncomfortable,” said Claire Wardle, director of First Draft, a research lab within Harvard’s Kennedy School that focuses on the impact of misinformation and that is a fact-checking partner of Facebook. “But the irony is that they can’t tell us how they are judging us — because if they do, the algorithms that they built will be gamed.”
This brings to mind the citizen “Social Credit System” recently implemented on a “trial basis” in China and set to officially launch in 2020. The scoring system rates the communist country’s citizenry based on their credit history, whether they fulfill contracts and obligations, their personal information, behaviors and preferences and interpersonal relationships. The score based on these criteria can determine whether citizens can shop online, rent a car, travel, get a loan, etc., and will separate people into new social strata.

As Wired writes:

Currently, Sesame Credit does not directly penalise (sic) people for being “untrustworthy” – it’s more effective to lock people in with treats for good behaviour (sic). But Hu Tao, Sesame Credit’s chief manager, warns people that the system is designed so that “untrustworthy people can’t rent a car, can’t borrow money or even can’t find a job”. She has even disclosed that Sesame Credit has approached China’s Education Bureau about sharing a list of its students who cheated on national examinations, in order to make them pay into the future for their dishonesty.
Penalties are set to change dramatically when the government system becomes mandatory in 2020. Indeed, on September 25, 2016, the State Council General Office updated its policy entitled “Warning and Punishment Mechanisms for Persons Subject to Enforcement for Trust-Breaking”. The overriding principle is simple: “If trust is broken in one place, restrictions are imposed everywhere,” the policy document states.
For instance, people with low ratings will have slower internet speeds; restricted access to restaurants, nightclubs or golf courses; and the removal of the right to travel freely abroad with, I quote, “restrictive control on consumption within holiday areas or travel businesses”. Scores will influence a person’s rental applications, their ability to get insurance or a loan and even social-security benefits. Citizens with low scores will not be hired by certain employers and will be forbidden from obtaining some jobs, including in the civil service, journalism and legal fields, where of course you must be deemed trustworthy. Low-rating citizens will also be restricted when it comes to enrolling themselves or their children in high-paying private schools. I am not fabricating this list of punishments. It’s the reality Chinese citizens will face. As the government document states, the social credit system will “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step”.

Given that Facebook is simply another arm of the government, we can’t help but wonder if this is the laying of the groundwork for a China-style citizen ratings system in the U.S. It’s common for the elites to send up trail balloons to see how ideas and programs will be received. And as Bob Livingston so often points out, the elites use a process of gradualism to shape thought and slowly implement liberty-stealing programs and processes.

The promise of a 'multipolar world' is a globalist con

From Brandon Smith at Personal Liberty:

The greatest tool at the disposal of globalists is the use of false paradigms to manipulate public perception and thus public action. The masses are led to believe that at the highest levels of geopolitical and financial power there is such a thing as "sides." This is utter nonsense when we examine the facts at hand.

We are told the-powers-that-be are divided by "Left" and "Right" politics, yet both sides actually support the same exact policy actions when it comes to the most important issues of the day and only seem to differ in terms of rhetoric, which is meaningless and cosmetic anyway. It is nothing but Kabuki theater.

We are told that corporate power must be balanced by government power and that government power must be balanced by "free markets," when in reality corporations are chartered and protected by governments and free markets simply do not exist in today's economy. In the case of social media "censorship," we are told that the solution is to use government power instead of simply launching our own alternative platforms. Yet, social media corporations exist in the form of monopolies exactly because of government power and intervention in business. The abuses of one "side" are being used to push us into the arms of the other side, which is just as abusive.

In terms of geopolitics, we are told that national powers stand "at cross-purposes;" that they have different interests and different goals, which has led to things like "trade wars" and sometimes shooting wars. Yet, when we look at the people actually pulling the strings in most of these countries, we find the same names and institutions. Whether you are in America, Russia China, the EU, etc., globalist think tanks and international banks are everywhere, and the leaders in all of these countries call for more power for such institutions, not less.

The wars, no matter what form they take, are a circus for the public. They are engineered to create controlled chaos and manageable fear. They are a means to influence us towards a particular end, and that end, in most cases, is more power in the hands of a select few. In each instance, people are being convinced to believe that the world is being divided when it is actually being centralized.

The key to any magic show is to get the audience to participate in the lie; to get them to focus on the distracting hand, to assume that what they are seeing is actually what is really happening, to suspend their skepticism.

Make no mistake, what we are seeing in geopolitics today is indeed a magic show. The false East/West paradigm is as powerful if not more powerful than the false Left/Right paradigm. For some reason, the human mind is more comfortable with the idea of divisions and chaos, and it recoils indignantly at the notion of "conspiracy." But conspiracies and conspirators can be demonstrated as a fact of history. Organization among elitists is common regardless of their national point of origin.
Globalists themselves are drawn together by an ideology. They have no common nation, they have no common political orientation, they have no common cultural background or religion, they herald from the East just as they herald from the West. They have no true loyalty to any mainstream cause or region of the planet.

What do they have in common? They seem to exhibit many of the traits of high level narcissistic sociopaths, who make up a very small percentage of the human population. These people are predators, or to be more specific, they are parasites. They see themselves as naturally superior to others, but they often work together if there is the promise of mutual benefit.

The closest thing I can relate narcissistic sociopaths (and thus globalists) to in mythology would be vampires. I have often wondered if the concept of "vampires" was created as a way for common people of the dark ages to explain the soulless and monstrous behavior of the elites of their time. The notion that any person is capable of that kind if evil is hard for people to accept to this day.

Vampires are usually depicted as elites, hiding in plain site as leaders of communities in the upper echelons of society. They seek out a village, insert themselves as upstanding patrons and aristocrats, then feed until that village is destroyed. Afterward, they move on to the next village. This is what they are. This is what they do, and they do it in organized fashion to make the process more efficient.
It takes a village to feed a vampire, or a narcissistic sociopath.

I relate this metaphor because I think it's important for common people to understand what we are really dealing with here. When some of us recoil at the notion of a cabal at the highest levels of finance and politics working towards nefarious purposes, they should know that this is easily explained not only in terms of historic myths and archetypes, but in well documented psychological study.

Analysts and activists within the liberty movement have proven impressively immune to many of the narratives and lies of conspiratorial globalists, which is why they are now the main target of multiple propaganda campaigns. Globalists don't feel comfortable climbing into their coffins to sleep during the day while so many Van Helsings are lurking about exposing their activities.

The latest propaganda effort I have seen is the idea of a "multipolar world" developing in the wake of what the IMF refers to as the "global economic reset." In fact, the term "multipolar world" is being used in alternative media circles a lot these days, and this is once again a ploy designed to con us into believing that centralization is no longer a threat and that the divisions we see are real rather than fabricated.

Under the multipolar narrative, we are told that the shift away from the U.S. dollar as the world reserve is now happening and that this is being led by Eastern political powers seeking alternatives.

This is true, to a point.

The lies surrounding this development are many, though. We are told that Eastern political powers are at odds with globalists and globalism — this is false. We are told that BRICS nations are seeking a decentralized system to replace dollar hegemony — this is false. We are told that Eastern leaders like Putin and Xi are countering the globalist power grab and are being targeted by the powers-that-be as if they are "rebelling" against the empire — this is also false. We are told that the trade war is a means for Donald Trump to disrupt globalization and throw a monkey wrench into the globalists plans — this is fantasy.

Liberty activists and analysts are particularly susceptible to the idea because it plays on our desire to see the longstanding dollar-based empire of the Federal Reserve fall into the oblivion it deserves. The problem is that the narrative is based on the fraudulent assumption that the globalist empire is rooted in the "American empire."

Here are the facts:

Globalist influences are hyper-present in eastern nations. For example, Vladimir Putin, who is often depicted as some kind of anti-globalist hero in liberty movement discussions, is not anti-globalist at all. Putin was "discovered" by vocal new world order proponent Henry Kissinger decades ago in the early 1990s before he took on the role as acting president of Russia. Putin relates the meeting with Kissinger and their longstanding friendship in the book First Person, his autobiographical account of his early career.

Contrary to popular belief in the liberty movement, Putin did not kick out international banks or remove their power structures during his presidential rise. In fact, Rothschild banks still operate in Russia to this day, while Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan continue to act as the largest investment banks in the country.

The globalist presence in Russia is perhaps why the nation developed such a close relationship with the IMF after the fall of the Soviet Union, why they continue their ties to the IMF an the Bank for International Settlements to this day and why the Kremlin has in the past called for a new global currency system controlled by the IMF.

China has also called for the same new monetary system, not decentralized, but completely centralized under the IMF. China also continues its ties to the BIS and Goldman Sachs is heavily involved in Chinese government activities and business arrangements. Only last year, Goldman established a $5 billion deal with an arm of the Chinese government to make it easier to purchase companies and assets within the United States. Donald Trump praised the deal as beneficial to the U.S., which is not surprising considering the number of Goldman Sachs alumni Trump has involved in his cabinet.

Trump has also had extensive dealings with Rothschild connected banking elites for the past 25 years. Wilber Ross, an investment banker working for the Rothschilds, was the primary agent that bailed Trump out of his considerable debts surrounding his Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City. After Trump's rise to the White House, he made Wilber Ross commerce secretary.

Clearly, there is no "division" between the world's political leaders when it comes to who they are allied with. Globalists and international banks are involved with all of them. But what about the rest of the world in general? Isn't the trade war causing division and decentralization among nations and economies? Not really.

Consider Russia's oil pipeline deal with Germany, or Russia's latest deal to allow China to farm over 2.5 million acres of Russian land, helping directly combat U.S. sanctions. Or what about the Caspian Sea deal between Russia, Iran and multiple other countries to end the dispute over the region? And how about China's defiance of sanctions on Iranian oil?

These are just some of the latest examples of the rest of the world melding into a larger conglomerate in the wake of the trade war. The trade war is bringing all these supposedly disparate countries together in a way that is rather convenient for globalists. If we take into account the reality of globalist influence in all major economies, then we have to also take into account the possibility that the "global economic reset" is not about a "multipolar world," but an even more centralized unipolar world. A world which sacrifices the U.S. model along with the dollar as world reserve and replaces it with something even worse.


In the meantime, liberty activists are being told that they should rally around the death of dollar and the global reset as if it is the end of globalism. In other words, we are supposed to stupidly believe that the shift to the new world order is "decentralization" simply because they call it "multipolar." Just because the U.S. is no longer the face of the beast does not mean the beast is gone.

To truth and knowledge,

Brandon Smith

Lack of "Cultural Competency" Liberals' Latest "Legal" Excuse for Muslim Crimes!

MUSLIM MIGRANT TAKES OUT HORRIFIC ACT ON PREGNANT WOMAN, LIBERAL JUDGE SET HIM FREE WITH THESE 4 WORDS

---

     

Today we live in an age where we have had been forced to begrudgingly accept atrocious crimes committed on a daily basis by migrants. What makes these crimes even worse is that our current justice system allows these criminals to get away with it. Thanks to Barack Obama’s insane policies over the past several years, we have seen a rise in illegal immigrant and migrant crime in America. Now, migrants and illegals have concocted a new defense for their inhumane actions, and sadly it was handed to them by the very same people within our legal system.

According to Teddy Stick:

Augustin Bahati is a refugee from the Congo. He recently had six domestic-violence related charges dropped after a prosecutor agreed that he “lacked the cultural competency to participate in the American justice system.” In case warning bells aren’t screaming yet, this is an incredibly dangerous defense. Since the inception of competency hearings, defendants have attempted to manipulate the system and use insanity as a reason for their crimes.

Culture competency is a new ploy and if the New Hampshire ruling is not overturned, it could catch on quickly. The discovery of the use of this defense by state Attorney General Gordon MacDonald led to the resignation of lawyer and the investigation of many others. Bahati appears to not be the only one to have used this defense. The excuse amounts to little more than saying that because Bahati is not American, he did not understand that is was illegal to “strike, push, grab, kick and pull out the hair of a woman who was 27 weeks pregnant at the time.”

Augustin Bahati got away with six charges of domestic violence. Perhaps she did not cover herself properly and needed to be punished? This may be perfectly acceptable under Sharia law but when did it become permissible in America. Critics of the decision to dismiss the charges point out that while under New Hampshire law it is allowable “for charges to be dismissed when an expert determines that a mental illness or mental disability has rendered a defendant incompetent to understand the charges against him and assist in his defense,” there are no similar provisions for “cultural incompetence.” Nor should there be.

Associate Attorney General Jane Young wrote, “This finding simply does not comport with the legal requirements for a finding of incompetency to stand trial and should have been aggressively litigated.” If this becomes an acceptable defense in the United States, any refugee, illegal immigrant, or even visitor could use it to get away with crimes. Acts such as honor killings, female genital mutilation, and jihad, would suddenly be dismissed because the perpetrator was “culturally incompetent.” It is easy to see how this could quickly spiral out of control and why it must be stopped immediately.

I am absolutely appalled by the downward spiral of morals and values within our justice system. There needs to be a bigger fight against this type of abuse within our criminal justice system. In my opinion, this is an issue that all Americans can agree on and help give a voice back to the victims who are being further victimized.

Bob Livingston on American Fascism

From Personal Liberty:

There is a silent marriage between big government and big business. It’s called fascism, or was in Italy. We have much the same thing in America.

Big business has and will promote every ideology and philosophy known to man to disguise its madness for profits and government favors. All governments are fronts for monopoly capitalism (fascism). America is not a capitalist system by any stretch. This is obvious to any sober person.

Government benefits big business. Big business benefits government. There’s a revolving door between top brass in the multinational corporations and the halls of power in the District of Criminals. They run and populate the president’s cabinet offices and the alphabet soup regulatory agencies. (For evidence, go to the membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations and see how many names you recognize from government, and study the bios of those you don’t.) In return, government policy is crafted and designed to enrich and favor big business.


The Big Tech companies are no exception and, in fact, prove the rule. Big Tech got/gets massive infusions from the national treasury – and are also government contractors — and in return they scarf up copious amounts of data and other information on their users and supply it to big government; their promises of data security notwithstanding.

With the corporate propaganda media losing its control over the flow of information, Big Tech is stepping in. And it’s partnering with the MSM and the power brokers who operate behind the scenes in an attempt to stifle any thought that falls outside the mainstream.

It’s doing this not just with government’s blessing, but with the threat of regulation or something more, as Communist Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut showed with his implied threat via Twitter.

Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it.

— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) August 6, 2018

When a major U.S. politician states that something “must” happen, then there is the implied threat that if “something” doesn’t happen then government will respond with “something” more.
Senate democrats are already circulating plans to take over the internet and impose all manner of privacy-invading and speech-stifling laws.

Remember, we told you that everything that is public policy is politically correct, and everything that is politically correct is public policy. It’s how governments ensure conformity and control.

CNN, the Communist News Network that is a purveyor of much of today’s fake news, overtly advocated for the removal of Alex Jones’ websites and podcasts from technology platforms in an attempt to drive him out of business. Facebook, YouTube, Apple, Pinterest, Spotify, Stitcher, YouPorn, LinkedIn and MailChimp all obliged and banned Infowars last week. This week, the comment platform Disqus (which we use on Personal Liberty®, for now) and the video platform Vimeo joined in the purge.

CNN – known for cutting off guests being interviewed live when they venture into subjects contrary to the official narrative – claims to support free speech. But when Newseum, the museum of news media established “to increase public understanding of the importance of a free press and the First Amendment” began selling President Donald Trump’s MAGA hats and t-shirts with the words “Fake News” in the CNN-style font on them, CNN sparked a social justice mob response that forced the museum to pull the items from its gift shop and issue an apology.

Other media outlets have joined in on the pile-on against Infowars and other deliverers of alternative news, claiming that “hate speech” (a nebulous, meaningless term) and “racism” (a term that was so overused in the Obama years that it, too, has lost its meaning) are “unacceptable” and have no place in a civilized society. In response, the media and tech giants have assumed the role of the government’s thought and speech police, with government sanction.

But it’s not just Infowars and so-called “alt-right” (another meaningless, fabricated term) media organs being removed from Big Tech; libertarians and so-called “alt-left” and far left sites are beginning to be purged.

No less than the U.S. Supreme Court, in Matal v. Tam, affirmed there is no such thing as “hate speech”:

[The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”

And:

A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.

The media and leftist elites love to call Trump a fascist, but in doing so they are engaging in Orwellian-style newspeak. Nationalism, crudeness or racism (not that we believe Trump is a racist) do not make one fascist. However, banning contrarian thought (21st century book burning) and beating people into submission – physically and verbally – are fascist tactics. The fascists of the left-wing terror group Antifa are far more fascist in their behavior and philosophy than Trump.

As historian Michael Leeden writes for Forbes:

This (calling Trump a fascist) is not a productive discussion. It has very little to do with fascism itself. For the most part, we hear about style, not ideas or ideology. We hear a lot about vulgarity, about the enthusiasm of crowds, and about threats to basic freedoms. All serious subjects, to be sure, but by making them reiterations of fascism (all the while saying they aren’t really fascism), we yank them from their proper context and make proper understanding of both fascism and our current crisis impossible.

Italian fascism, which came to power in 1922, was a war ideology. They argued that the country should be governed by the heroes of the First World War. The fascists fought violent socialist bands in the streets of Italy’s major cities (not so much a doctrinal conflict as a reaction to the Socialists’ opposition to the war). The street violence was not a monopoly of either fascists or Socialists, but characterized the whole society. Indeed, it characterized the whole continent. Remember that the Bolsheviks had seized power in Moscow, and were calling for global revolution. The Italian left was inspired by this revolutionary event, and fascism was in part a response to this threat.

This newspeak is dangerous to liberty.

Mind control through government propaganda has overshadowed any physical threat to our physical security. We are already in a psychological jail at the mercy of the propaganda ministry.

This is what is meant by benevolent totalitarianism. America has German-style fascism, just without the jackboots.

You don’t have to know that you are a slave to be one. Military occupation is no longer necessary (visibly). Total war goes on against the people all the time. Remember that corporations are also engaged in a corporate repeal of the 2^nd Amendment, again with government blessing if not government sanction (see, Obama’s Operation Chokepoint).

Few people ever come to the realism that big government in cooperation with big business (fascism) work together to perpetually extract labor, wealth and liberty from the people.

The key to this conspiracy is to keep the people dependent on the government under what is euphemistically called “public policy.”

"Alt-Right" vs. "(((The Jews)))!"? Both Are Victims of THE WHITE CURSE!

THE WHITE CURSE:

Geneticists classify Jews (and their inbred Arab cousins) as Caucasians. Even if some of them are still so paranoid (or maybe even most of them, especially because of their allegedly higher intelligence) that they circle the wagons in a predictable, “My Team (Tribe), Right OR Wrong!” manner, it’s no different from any other group or gang mentality, including yours, "Alt-Righter/neo-Nazis!"

Even the most powerful Jews (the banksters) don’t actually take sides – they fund and exploit all sides in any given conflict (the Rothschilds financed Hitler, after all).

How can some of the better ones be Conservatives and rabidly support Capitalism and free enterprise (like Michael Savage and David Horowitz) and thus play into the “greedy interest-charging Jew” stereotype, while so many if not most others support Communism?!

And Yes, I am aware that certain small “Alt-Right” and self-described “neo-Nazi” types like Christopher Cantwell have been effectively de-platformed and cut off from Jewish-owned censorship-prone payment processing companies.

Either way, Jews are just as stupid (or even more so, due to their affliction of high intelligence) as anyone else – and so it always backfires against them. As the common saying goes, “The Jews are their own worst enemies!”

CAPISCE?

Further, the Jews suffer from the same White Curse as the rest of us do!

Let’s define terms: Intelligence is speed of thought and memory. Smarts or wisdom is how one uses that intelligence (hint: honesty is the best policy, and deliberately self-inflicted paranoia leads to all other, ultimately stupid, “mental illnesses”).

The White Curse is that increased intelligence leads to a certain type of stupidity denied to the less intelligent breeds: the one and only real drawback of White intelligence is that the ability to see so far into the future leads some of the more weak-minded ones (“liberals”) to see all the potential problems as inevitable, and so they become paranoid masochists who hypocritically pretend to instantly compromise with and Submit to (and actually cause or induce others to cause) those very same problems which cause those pains they fear the most! That way, they can pretend to ‘control’ and cancel the additional pains caused by fearing them!

Notice how all the destructive self-hating “liberals” are whites/Jews! No other breeds on earth act that way!

It takes a certain level of intelligence to be that stupid!

;-)

PS: If anyone is offended by "RACISM," they should realize that "Racism" is indeed simply a combination of both genetics (Nature) and indoctrination (Nurture).

It's both a natural expression of like marrying like, with the Asians being the biggest "racists"  (and the Whites being the lest "racist!") by that measurement, and also the result, on the other hand, of our free-will right to freedom of association. 

Without an inherent, genetic predisposition to "racism," no "races" - not even the poor oppressed victimal "People Of Color" ones so favored by the Left - would be able to have existed at all, ever!

Leftist gangsters want to nullify both our genetic predispositions and our intellectual rights to make free-will choices for ourselves - they are, as always, all about control (aka SLAVERY)!

Communists are gangster slavers; ditto for "Socialists" "Nazis" and libertine "liberal" criminals in general, including "Muslims:" - all so called "Totalitarians" are always all about total control of other people - aka SLAVERY.

How Feminine Wiles Became Feminist Lies

Preface: EXTORTION 101:

Note: This will only work on more intelligent (paranoid/guilt-prone) people; aka on straight white males.

"Victimality:" is to always play the victim, to perpetually slander and extort the alleged "oppressors."
The best (least risk, most rewarding) way is to blame the largest leaderless group: straight white males.

The best way to do that, is to pretend to "champion" gays, non-whites, and females, as victims of same.

Also note: Governments in general defuse men's naturally constructive hopeful anger with guilty pity.

So governments act as women, in that they are parasitical gangster takers extorting makers by inducing them into deferring their own rights and responsibilities to think for themselves to them as expert authority.

Governments are the largest gangs of criminal victimals: "You are victims and need us to run your lives."

And if you're not a good and loyal fellow victim gang-member, then you're a potential criminal oppressor.

Governments enslave people by knowing that the best way to undermine others (sell me high to buy you low) is to convince them their anger is bad and pity is good for everyone: that they are all helpless victims.

;-)

Women Are Victimals 101:

Women are prone to pity simply in order to not angrily destroy their offspring before they can grow up.

Also, their not being prone to anger prevents them from being destroyed for physically challenging men.

This also leaves women open to pitying criminals and the enemies of their own tribes as fellow victims.

Women are naturally subjectivist hypocrites, aka criminals (hence Muhammad's "more women in Hell" meme).

How Feminine Wiles Became Feminist Lies:

Women are natural communist gangsters. Feminism is really a form of slanderous victimality aka extortion.

Feminism is a divisive, anti-human sexist lie. There is no "Patriarchy" of men conspiring to oppress and control women because they fear their intelligence. Women made that slander up to blame men for their own failings. Men simply do not regard women in terms of their intelligence AT ALL. Men objectify women and instinctively want to protect women, and only want to "control" them in the exact same way that women want to control small children: by hugging them close and not letting them wander off into danger. Men also see women as sex objects, and want to "sequester" their women to keep them safe from all other men.

This is a natural biological instinct, evolved over time to preserve and continue one's own genes alone.

Women are natural liars, as they know that there is no conspirational "Patriarchy" and that, on the exact contrary, men will always instinctively want to defend and protect women, and so the women then always act like helpless victims in order to exploit that interest and to get laid; (the "damsel in distress" act or syndrome) men always fall for it, and women know that men always fall for it. Fraud is a crime.

Women are naturally hypocritical slanderous extortive victimals, all about the double standards: they all seem to want to be seen as weak when it suits them, but also strong when being weak no longer suits them.

(Men, on the other hand, always have to be seen as strong - unless being "sensitive" can get them laid)!

Either way, the goal is to increase their rights and dilute their personal responsibilities by offloading their responsibilities onto men, while denying the men their self-defense rights, thus enslaving the men.

Women will offer sympathy (pity) for everyone, and also demand pity: but only for them selves. Otherwise, they want their men to be dedicated only to them, and usefully angry at every one and every thing else.

But in always virtue-signalling pity for everyone, to build themselves up as caring sharing altruistic and magnanimous, they implicitly slander-shame their own men as potential oppressors for resisting it.

This is both how and why women will undermine their own men in order to keep their other options open.

When women feel too safe, they will want to preserve and continue their own genes alone, by increasing their own offspring's viability by having sex with different men, while remaining safe. So in order to justify wanting to ditch their current boyfriends to have guilt-free monkey sex, women will complain about how their boyfriends are misogynistic members of the oppressive male chauvenist patriarchy, usually to their husbands' or boyfriends' best friends, who, being guys, will always agree with them to get laid.

There is no way any man would ever band together with any other man to protect his own woman, much less to oppressively protect someone else's girlfriend. On the contrary, almost ALL men will go along with women's lies about how all men are misogynists, ("Except for ME, of course!") and they will also all pretend to admit that "The Patriarchy" is real, and will even gladly call themselves "Male Feminists" in order to play the "White Knight" meme, to then claim their reward from the grateful damsel, and get laid.

This is only basic monkey biology. Feminism is societal cancer: anti-human misandristic slander and extortion. It's a simple predictable behavior pattern showing what every individual does, but due to the nature of self-serving oppressive and enslaving government, has recently been actually enshrined in our laws as a mandatory virtue, and is falsely actually blamed on - and therefore also endorses as the antidote to a problem which has never really existed - group force. As usual, the government motto is "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - AGAIN!" Hence the "Feminist" victimality extortion industry has now reached critical mass in the West, with the preposterous "#MeToo" movement.

This is why the legal system discriminates 90% in favour of women and against men in all divorce cases:

Since men are larger stronger and smarter than women, "of course!" the evil male used undue influence to trick the helpless damsels-in-distress, and so all the lawyers and judges of both sexes must defend them!

This is the brutal truth of the real-world systemic government-enforced sexism which exists these days - not the literally preposterous exact opposite lying slanderous extortion meme of "feminist victimology!"

A SHORT HISTORY OF TODAY'S ILLS AND THE OBVIOUSLY INEVITABLE BOTTOM  LINE:

Even Muhammad knew women are more naturally evil than men! Because of the size and strength difference, they are more conniving, manipulative, deceptive nasty slanderous and sneakier than honest men! That's why "feminism" (the female point of view made mandatory in law) is societal cancer!

https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/muslim-terror-expert-females-4-times-as-deadly-as-men/

Feminism was invented by "Fast" Eddie Bernays, - Sigmund Fraud's nephew and author of the book "PROPAGANDA" to incite women into thinking men had been historically enslaving them - in order to enslave both sexes by giving corporations another easy source of labor while simultaneously cutting everyone's wages in half, by inducing women to join the workforce. This short-sighted but immediately lucrative "wimmins' rights" scam led to women dying of cancer as they became "equal" to men by taking up such bad habits as smoking and drinking, while it also led to a massive decrease in Western birthrates and the "need" to import a slave class of foreigners (these days, mostly muslims) which again managed to double the labor force while cutting the average wage in half. The muslims' women won't be feminists, but will help the globalist corporations' new slave class work force to increase in size at the literally direct expense of the allegedly smarter whites they are replacing. "Feminism" was the first wedge issue that led to all other forms of divisive identity politics (racial/Black Lives Matter racism, and sexual - gay and trans and WTF else) to finish us off. It led to all forms of "reverse" discrimination legislation which further destroyed every individual's basic equal human rights (especially those of straight white males) in favor of group rights and directly led to the creation of the roaming packs of corporate extortion armies of petulently infantile "Social Justice Warriors."

GLOBAL CORPORATIONS, AND THE BANKS WHICH THRIVE ON "CREATIVE" DESTRUCTION, ARE BEHIND THIS!

These short-sighted destructively pathological criminals are all, by definition, traitors to all sovereign nations and their people. Salesmen will trade away everything - even their own futures - for the idol of money and the power of slavery it represents.

So, as to the common: "Why bring in people who cannot assimilate and have violence in their DNA?" question ...

The obvious answer must be: "Er ... maybe: "Because banksters exist for "creative destruction!"?

They always finance both sides in all conflicts, (remember how the Jewish Rothschild banksters even financed Hitler himself?!) so that when they're over, (and even during them) the loser owes the winners AND the banksters, and the winners owe them, too!

So all conflicts are win/win for them, and lose/lose for us!

But when there's no conflict, there's no fast lucrative turnovers either!

So conflict is good for banksters, and stability sucks for them.

Therefore banksters will always attack first, foment sedition and destruction in order to prophit from it.

Conclusion: All banksters are by definition criminals.

Further, when they loan you money, it's fake, "fiat" money - aka counterfeit! But when you pay them back, it's in collateral on real property which you literally slaved away to work to buy for them.

Conclusion: All Banksters are slavers.

Note: Our alleged Globalist Corporate Bankster masters, aka (((The Jews))), suffer from the exact same White Curse the rest of us do! (Caveat: Obviously, not all Jews are banksters, and definitely not all banksters are Jewish, either! In fact, by far, most banksters are not Jewish - for instance, there's plenty of banksters in China, obviously - but the Jewish proclivity for in-group nepotism and hiring their own brethren when they're onto a "good thing" as usual condemns them to be as disproportionately represented in global finance as they are in all other top job spots - thus inviting the preposterous trope that they are and always were actively the ones behind whatever goes wrong in the world)!

Let's define terms: Intelligence is speed of thought and memory. Smarts or wisdom is how one uses that intelligence (hint: honesty is the best policy, and deliberately self-inflicted paranoia leads to all other ultimately stupid "mental illnesses").

The White Curse is that increased intelligence leads to a certain type of stupidity denied to the less intelligent breeds: the one and only real drawback of White intelligence is that the ability to see so far into the future leads some of the more weak-minded ones ("liberals") to see all the potential problems as inevitable, and so they become paranoid masochists who hypocritically pretend to instantly compromise with and Submit to (and actually cause or induce others to cause) those very same problems which cause those pains they fear the most! That way, they can pretend to 'control' and cancel the additional pains caused by fearing them! Notice how all the destructive self-hating "liberals" are whites/Jews! No other breeds on earth act that way!

As usual, the Jews are their own worst enemies; none of this "creative destruction" will end well, neither for them nor all mankind.

Facebook Tries to Access Users' Financial History

With their recent history of data manipulation leaks, how long before FASCBOOK crashes the stock market, too?!

From here and here:

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Facebook has approached multiple large banks to access their customers' financial data, such as card transactions and checking account balances, to "deepen user engagement" -- a claim the social media platform now says isn't true.

According to the report, Facebook has been in contact with JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and U.S. Bancorp to try and get users' financial data. The social media company says it's so that they can show you your checking balance in the Facebook Messenger app, allow you to contact your bank in Messenger as a customer service tool, and attempt to develop fraud alert software.

Facebook maintained these discussions were completely centered around the Messenger app, and that data received from the banks would not be sold to third parties for advertisements.

“We don’t use purchase data from banks or credit card companies for ads,” said spokeswoman Elisabeth Diana. “We also don’t have special relationships, partnerships, or contracts with banks or credit-card companies to use their customers’ purchase data for ads.”

However, Facebook denies that they are actively trying to access users' purchasing history.

"A recent Wall Street Journal story implies incorrectly that we are actively asking financial services companies for financial transaction data -- this is not true," a Facebook spokesperson told CNNMoney. "Like many online companies with commerce businesses, we partner with banks and credit card companies to offer services like customer chat or account management."

Several of the aforementioned banks have also said they are not disclosing their customer’s banking information.

"We don't share our customers' off-platform transaction data with these platforms and have had to say 'No' to some things as a result," said JPMorgan Chase spokeswoman Patricia Wexler.

"While we regularly have conversations about potential partnerships, safeguarding the security and privacy of our customers' data and providing customer choice are paramount in everything we do," Citigroup told AFP.

Facebook is allegedly trying to compete with other online monetary systems like PayPal and Venmo, especially since the rise in use of the Facebook Marketplace system.