https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Trumps-peace-plan-sets-conditions-for-surrender-Palestinians-tell-UNSC-589331

<iframe width="680" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/orU_xU6S8CI" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Greenblatt full of feces at UNSC.

    Jason  repeats the litany of  Hamas attacks but fails to recognize the root cause: immutable Islamic doctrine enshrined in the Koran and codified in Shari'ah.

The core issue of the conflict is the demonic imperative to wage war on Jews. The imperative is enshrined in Surah At-Taubah 9.29 and codified in Reliance Of The Traveller Book o, Chapter 9: o9.8.
Compliance carries the reward of eternal orgy; shirking carries the punishment of eternal damnation.

Nothing Trump can promise excells eternity in the garden of eden with sex slaves, rivers of wine and orchards of low hanging fruit always in season. Nothing he can threaten excells enternity in Allah's fire.

Only the ingnorant and insane hope for peace while the earth is Muslim infested.

THE WOKER COMETH!

Here's the real definition of today's slang-word, "WOKE:" A paranoid racist slanderer and fake news conspiracy theorist trying to enslave everyone by using the excuse of divisive "identity-politics" gang-rights "social justice." GET WOKE, GO BROKE!

Hate-Speech & Hate-Crime Laws

ALL liberal “hate-speech laws” ARE crimes!!!

"The whole concept of "hate speech" (laws against hurt feelings) is political correctness run amok, a leftist anti-free-speech tool that provides an unlimited excuse to shut down and punish anyone who openly disagrees with establishment dicta. Every totalitarian state has similar laws designed to protect the rulers. Such laws have no place in a free society."

 - Patrick1984 -

But Terminiello v. Chicago (1949), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977), R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992), Virginia v. Black (2003), Snyder v. Phelps (2011) These SCOTUS cases show that unpopular speech is still protected speech.

SO: What is "hate-speech" and why should it be considered a crime if it's NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

If it's not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech - or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one's life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating - then it's THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of 'hurt feelings!' So it isn't objectively "offensive," but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively "offended" by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive 'arguments' to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

ALL "Hate-Speech Laws" ARE CRIMES!

“Progressive” criminals - who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims' rights - pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).

So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, "make" them commit even more crimes!

Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?

NO - not because it's "hateful" (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and "HATE" is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without 'hate' we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in  order to stop those crimes.


Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at - but that's already illegal, not because of the anger displayed - that's just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts - but because it's fraudulent slander.

Such criminal leftists who try to make "hate" into a crime, only ever make it 'illegal' to hate crime itself!

Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats ... and even those aren't illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!

Measles Vaccine Proves FAR More Deadly Than The Measles

From here:

Measles vaccines kill more children than the measles… and it’s not even close

May 3, 2019 Ethan Huff

(Natural News) With all of the hysteria and fear-mongering about measles that’s sweeping mainstream media headlines these days, one might assume that children everywhere are dropping dead from this chickenpox-like infection. But according to official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), not a single person has died while being infected with measles in more than 15 years.

On the other hand, it’s an undeniable fact that at least 100 people have died as a consequence of receiving the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella, which we’ve all been told by government health authorities, is supposed to protect against measles.

As is now obvious to everyone who’s actually paying attention, the MMR vaccine is actually far more dangerous than measles itself, which back in the 1950s and 1960s was joked about in television shows like “The Brady Bunch” for being a harmless rite of passage from childhood into adulthood.

Back in 2014, CDC Director for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases told the Associated Press that there hasn’t been a measles-associated death since 2003. This claim was more recently confirmed by the CDC’s Division of Viral Diseases, which again reiterated in an email that there have been no measles-associated deaths in the U.S. since 2003.

It’s important to also keep in mind that even those very few deaths reported in 2003 and prior may not have actually been caused by measles, as the CDC merely tracks deaths that coincide with measles infections – much like the CDC, as well as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), do with data targeting raw milk.

“The weekly CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports (MMWR) since that date have not revealed any measles deaths either,” explains Brian Shilhavy, an editor for Health Impact News, about supporting CDC data showing that measles is basically harmless, and no more serious than the common cold.

For more news about how the mainstream media, corrupt politicians, and industry-bought health authorities are lying to the public about measles, be sure to check out Propaganda.news.

Measles mortality rates had already declined to almost nil BEFORE the vaccine industry introduced the first measles vaccine in 1963

In fact, measles may actually be a safer disease than the common cold, as illustrated by dataset showing that mortality caused by measles is extremely uncommon, especially in the era of proper sanitation.

Included in Shilhavy’s article is a graph showing how the measles mortality rate had reached almost zero by around 1950 – more than a decade before the first measles vaccine was introduced in 1963.

What this graph proves, in other words, is that measles vaccines are pretty much worthless, as well as the fact that measles truly is a no-big-deal disease that, once a person recovers from it naturally, confers permanent, lifelong immunity to measles – which can’t be said for measles vaccines, by the way, which only provide temporary and incomplete immunity, at best.

“Before the introduction of measles vaccines in the 1960s, nearly all children contracted measles before adolescence, and parents and physicians accepted measles as a ‘more or less inevitable part of childhood,’” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a pro-health freedom child advocacy group that’s currently in the process of suing Merck & Co., the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine, for falsifying data about the vaccine’s alleged safety and efficacy.

“In industrialized countries, measles morbidity and mortality already were low and declining, and many experts questioned whether a vaccine was even needed or would be used.”

Be sure to read CHD’s full report about measles, natural measles immunity, and the total scam that is the MMR vaccine.

See VaccineDeaths.com for more reporting on vaccine mortality in America and around the world.

Sources for this article include:

HumansAreFree.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

COMMUNITY LINKS: Visit Our Sister 

And Even More, from HERE.

;-)

Canadian Senate Ethnics Committee Needs Unpaid Leave to Reflect on the Errors of Their Ways

Referring to an article from here:

These sober second-thought senators seem convinced all individuals have not only an ethnic and racial right, but also a group-rights responsibility, to adhere to an inferior culture, lest their precious feewings be hurt! That's the real "racism" here, not the nonsense about "rife stereotypical negative beliefs, assumptions and prejudices directed at (Indigenous people") ascribed to Senator Lynn Beyaks' posted letters by Senate Ethics Officer Pierre Legault.

But our "indigenous natives" - who can only be considered local "minorities," as they are really part of the global MAJORITY - seem to themselves have at some point given up on their own more successful ancestral traditions and "culture" - as their own cousins back in China seem to be rather more industrious these days, having the world's second-largest economy, complete with space travel and self-created artificial islands. Only extortive liberal victimologists could convince the Asians that they're victims of the oppressively mentally superior whites, who shouldn't have to bother to work for them selves as long as they can extort endless reparations from whitey simply for having been locally decimated by centuries-past Spanish plagues.

Nobody has an inherent racial right to remain stupid - and it's clearly, perfectly obvious to most people that these displaced backwoods hillbillies' primitive tribal "culture," (social education) - having had no written languages - IS inferior to both European capitalism and Chinese communism.

The Canadian Senate is unelected as senators are supposed to enjoy security of tenure for a reason: so that they can literally speak the truth to political power, and not have to pander to politically correct factual incorrectness and place feelings over facts like the rest of the empty-headed, virtue-signalling professional hypocrites in the political class. So if and when they feel free to vote out their "own" members for putting objective facts before political opinions, it becomes high time to revisit the putative "necessity" of paying our taxes to such a clearly corrupted institution - for some if not most of these senators clearly no longer represent our best interests - nor, even, ultimately, their own.

It is the senate ethics committee itself, and not Senator Beyak, who continue to breach their own conflict-of-interest code:

The residential schools weren't meant to assimilate indigenous cultures into European-Canadian ones, nor were they specifically designed to "deprive children of connections to their homes and families" any more than any other schools with residential student housing ever were! It was (and, apparently, still is) simply more economical to bring the student to the schools, in stead of to bring the schools to the students' homes - especially when those homes are deep in the primeval Northern woods where even basic transportation infrastructure like roads is still close to nonexistent.

Teaching science isn't "racial" abuse.

And while it's no doubt true that many of the students "were subjected to physical, psychological and sexual abuse, and several thousand died" over the decades, such treatment was part of no officially-sanctioned government or church education plans, and as usual, all such unsanctioned crimes committed by individuals should lead to prosecutions of those individuals - and not be paid in perpetuity by the non-native Canadian public at large.

Nor should Senator Beyak be punished for her "thought crimes" by the communist-like totalitarians who seek to shame her for her "racist" telling of the truth, by depriving her of her rightful access to Senate resources simply because the racist ethics - or, more appropriately, "ethnics" committee members, and especially the Cuckservitor chairwoman, Raynell Andreychuk, wants to pretend that telling an uncomfortable truth is racist.

The Senate does not appoint Senators - the citizen-elected government of the Canadian people does. Therefore, neither should the Senate itself have any power to sanction any Senator, much less by depriving them of income and access to the resources granted to ALL Senators equally, no matter which party appointed them, simply for a thought-crime of speaking truth to idiots.

Nor should anyone in a free and democratic society EVER be sentenced to be forced to apologize (as respect must be earned, and cannot be commanded, as even most small children, but apparently not most senators, already know) much less be forced to pay out of their own pockets to be re-educated in "racial sensitivities" (extortive victimology) by any government body or entity!

In attempting to punish Senator Beyak, Senator Andreychuk isn't "confronting" racist behaviour - she's actively PROMOTING it. 

By saying "The Senate as a house of Parliament must defend the principle that all persons" (really, all divisive identity-politics group or gang rights extortion rackets) "are equal in law and dignity" (i.e: snowflakes whose precious feelings must be protected from the cold hard truth, as the truth tends to hurt - liars) "the suitability of a Senator is linked to the recognition and respect" (fear of hurting other's feelings with the facts) "of this principle" (that people - especially those swarthy "Victims-Of-Colour" - as groups are condemned and locked in by such liberal stereotyping to their racial beliefs and cultural educations, and so cannot, as individuals, ever choose to learn otherwise, and so it's mean of us mentally superior whites to force them to have to try to!

The racist Senate's implication is that "We should just keep paying them welfare to stay drunk on their reservations (lands they 'reserved,' to withdraw into by them selves, when their numbers were decimated by the afore-mentions Spanish plagues) because we all know no other race or breed of humans has ever become a success after being cursed with alcoholic genes (aka the Irish)."

No, wait! The Irish are a successful people, industrious and lauded for their poetry, and despite having a similar genetic disposition to alcoholism, don't consider themselves perpetual victims of others! Now, that's either because they are also white, or it's because they refuse to indulge in self-pity. It's either nature or nature, you liberal racists - so: are Canada's "Indigenous" Asians victims of their bad genes (Asians in general are known to be fairly intelligent, relentless workaholics) or could it be that these local Asians have been tempted by devilish liberals to believe in lucratively perpetual despair? Perhaps their children commit suicide in disproportionate numbers not due to racist white oppression, but from being "taught" (abused) by racist liberals into believing that they should consider them selves to be!

It seems obvious that it's really the Senators on the ethics committee itself, who are still ingrained with habitual pandering to politically correct behaviour, who would most 'benefit from (unpaid) time away from the Senate to gain further perspective on their TAXPAYER-PAID privileges (of tenure independent of politial interference) and of the obligation of serving the public (by telling only the truth, and not continuing to virtue-signalling to special interest "minority" groups for political gains in elections) and so should be appropriately suspended and given time to reflect on the factual errors of their extortive ways.

If the Senate no longer exists to uphold its separate mandate to address facts without political bias, it shouldn't exist at all.

Yes, ALL Muslims ARE Terrorists!

First off, here's a simple fact about islam which *might* even give your average muslim pause:

If and when muslims posit their god as being "unknown and unknowable," then it's incredibly hypocritical of them to pretend to be so outraged by other religions' alleged tellings of "lies" about the nature of god, that they feel obliged to go out and wage war and murder them for it.

That's really only them doubling-down on their own lies, for all religion is at best mere speculation presented as fact - in other words, it's all a pack of lies!

Therefore, who does islam *really* benefit? Obviously, not god.

So it can only be a lying excuse to benefit its fraudulent founder, Muhammad.

And there's a copious amount of anecdotal evidence (aka all the hadiths) to prove it, too.

i.e:

"WE SOMEHOW KNOW THAT GOD IS UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABLE,

AND IF YOU SAY OTHERWISE, YOU'RE A LIAR AND WE KEEL YOU FOR IT!"

That's islam in a nut's hell.

Beyond this simple and obvious truth, I just had to respond to a stupid article by Glenn K. Beaton as roasted by Hugh Fitzgerald, here:

Re: "Blaming today’s Muslims for 9/11 is like blaming today’s Germans for the Holocaust."

NO, IT REALLY ISN'T. If he had said "is like blaming all ARABS for 9/11," he'd have been correct.

But the equivalent of "muslims" (crime-gangsters) in this equation is "nazis" so let's try that one out:

"Blaming today’s Nazis for the Holocaust is like blaming today’s Nazis for the Holocaust."

Sorry, what?! Anyway, moving right along to his next fallacy:

Re: "So are all Muslims terrorists? No."

Actually, YES, they ARE.

According to even your own sharia "law" texts, no muslims are "civilians."

In islam, ALLAH DID NOT CREATE ALL HUMANS EQUAL!

According to the Qur'an, allah deliberately made infidels so muslims could murder them for him, as a test of their obedience (well, more as a joke, since allah knows in advance who will pass and fail his tests, and it's all predetermined predestined force anyway)!

If they truly follow islam, then YES muslims are ALL terrorists.

Just like you couldn't be a "nazi" and not support Hitler and Mein Kampf, you can't (by your own rules) be a "muslim" and not be a terrorist, because that's what the Qur'an commands and Muhammad himself did: terrorize and extort everyone else!

ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS!

"Terrorism" is really only the simple crime of "extortion" writ large! Extortion is "threats!"

ALL muslims are criminals, simply by being members of the world's largest and most ancient yet ongoing crime-gang.

Being a member of a crime-gang is a crime, even if the member hasn't committed any specific crime beyond that of their general membership, because they represent the inherent public threat the crime-gang presents.

It's the Law.

Everything muslims pretend to believe is "holy" is already a crime!

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells you muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur'an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims' heads.

(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him)."

It's all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn't by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

Sure, some dispensations from mandatory participation in jihad are given for physical disabilities, like for old age, blindness, lameness etc., but the very listing of those exemptions in your Qur'an only serves to prove that the word "jihad" means violent and non-defensive warfare.

And those exempted from physical participation are still obliged to be accessories and equip and otherwise assist those who are still physically able to participate in the raids.

That is, the Qur'an demands muslims wage offensive war - not in self-defense - but because of others' "disbelief!"

For instance:

9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

9:14. Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people,

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad when fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn

Muslims are commanded to hurt us in any way they can and are promised Brownie Points for it.

So don't go looking for what actions of yours may have offended or provoked them; they have been taught from birth that your existence alone offends their god, and so should offend them.

Muslims have been officially taught to believe that they are the “best of people” (Qur’an 3:110) and that unbelievers are the “most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).

So NO muslim is isolated from the evil crime of islam's mandatory "jihad" terrorism.

Read the Qur'an! It is inseverable: 2.85. Jihad is ordained for Muslims: 2.216. It commands acts of terrorism: 8.12, 57 & 60. It rewards acts of terrorism: 9.120. It commands perpetual war: 8.39 & 9.29. Believers are only those who wage war: 9.111 & 49.15.

What believing Muslim is not a terrorist? 33.21 orders Muslims to emulate Moe. Bukhari 1.8.387 & 4.52.220 have him bragging about winning with terror. 8.12, 8.57 & 8.60 command Muslims to engage in terrorism. 9.120 promises Brownie Points for acts of terrorism. Get a clue.

Moe was a terrorist: Bukhari 1.8.331 & 4.52.220. Muslims are commanded to emulate him: QV 33.21. They may not be actively engaged in terror acts, but all Muslims are terrorists. Islam is war: 2.216, 8.39, 57, 60, 65; 9.5, 29, 111. 120 & 123. Islam is all or nothing; a bundled package deal: 2.85.

Moe said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear. Look up the hadith in Tafsir Ibn Kathir "The Benefits Of Iron"; it is near the end of the page.

Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters. Look them up in Ibn Sa'd or alquraan.net.

He prayed for prey at Badr. He asked the "Lord of the Devils" for "the good of this town" before every ghazwat. Look it up in "The Life of Muhammad".pg. 510-511.

Crack open Sahih Bukhari and read the books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition, they show us what Islam really is. Obtain clues from the Qur'an, too. 3:151, 8:12, 39, 57, 60, 65, 67, 9:5, 29, 38, 39, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 47:4, 49:15, 59:2, 13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

If a Muslim is a believer, he is a threat to our lives, liberties and prosperity, whether in a pack or acting as a lone wolf.

Jihad is what Islam is; what Muslims do and it is defined in Islamic law as "war against non-Muslims." Look it up in "Reliance Of The Traveller" Book o, Chapter 9.0 and try to prove me wrong.

Offensive Jihad is fard al-Kifaya, to be performed in every year. When we retaliate, the obligation becomes fard al-ayn: binding on the entire Ummah individually. That makes every Muslim a ticking time bomb.

You hope that we Kuffar are stupid, ignorant and gullible. Unfortunately for you, a growing number of us are scratching below the surface, reading the Qur'an, hadith, exegesis & jurisprudence to discover the reality of Islam.

"The Book Of Jihad" and the second volume of "Hedaya" are excellent sources of information.

OBAMA’S TREASON: EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT

From here:

OBAMA’S TREASON: EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT
But Leftist Privilege will prevent him from ever being held accountable.

June 7, 2018  Robert Spencer

(This article is nearly a year old, but pResident Hussein still hasn't been charged).

The Washington Free Beacon reported Wednesday that “the Obama administration skirted key U.S. sanctions to grant Iran access to billions in hard currency despite public assurances the administration was engaged in no such action, according to a new congressional investigation.”

And it gets even worse: “The investigation, published Wednesday by the House Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, further discloses secret efforts by top Obama administration officials to assure European countries they would receive a pass from U.S. sanctions if they engaged in business with Iran.”

This revelation comes after the news that came to light in February, that, according to Bill Gertz in the Washington Times, “the U.S. government has traced some of the $1.7 billion released to Iran by the Obama administration to Iranian-backed terrorists in the two years since the cash was transferred.”

There is a law that applies to this situation. U.S. Code 2381 says: “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

In a sane political environment, Barack Obama would be tried for treason.

Barack Hussein Obama has planted seeds that will be bearing bitter fruit for years, and probably decades, to come. He is, without any doubt, the worst President in American history. Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan? Yes, the doughface Presidents made the Civil War inevitable, but worse came later. Grant? Blind to corruption and out of his depth, but there have been worse than he as well. Wilson? That black-hearted Presbyterian bigot arguably gave the world Hitler and World War II, so he is definitely in the Final Four. Harding? Nah: his tax cuts and return to “normalcy” got the American economy, and the Twenties, roaring. FDR and LBJ gave us the modern welfare state and dependent classes automatically voting Democrat; the full bill on the damage they did hasn’t yet been presented. Nixon? A crook and an economic Leftist, who betrayed Taiwan for the People’s Republic; his record certainly isn’t good. Carter? Nothing good can be said about his four years of sanctimony and incompetence.

But there is one thing Barack Obama has on all competitors: treason.

He showered hundreds of billions of dollars on the Islamic Republic of Iran. There are those who say, “It was their money. It belonged to the Iranian government but was frozen and not paid since 1979.” Indeed, and there was a reason for that: not even Jimmy Carter, who made the Islamic Republic of Iran possible, thought that money, which had been paid by the Shah’s government in a canceled arms deal, belonged to the mullahs who overthrew the Shah. Likewise Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush all thought that the Islamic Republic was not due money that was owed to the Shah.

Only Barack Obama did.

The definition of treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. The leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran order their people to chant “Death to America” in mosques every Friday, and repeatedly vow that they will ultimately destroy the United States of America and the state of Israel. How was giving them billions and helping them skirt sanctions applied by the U.S. government not treason?

Other Presidents have been incompetent, corrupt, dishonest, but which has committed treason on a scale to rival the treason of Barack Obama?

The Iranians also operate a global network of jihad terror organizations, one of which, Hizballah, is quite active in Mexico now, with the obvious ultimate intention of crossing the border and committing jihad massacres of Americans. Obama has given a tremendous boost to these initiatives, as well as to Iran’s nuclear program, with his nuclear deal that has given the Iranians hundreds of billions of dollars and essentially a green light to manufacture nuclear weapons, in exchange for absolutely nothing.

There is no telling when the worst consequences of Obama’s aid and comfort to the Islamic Republic of Iran will be felt. But they likely will be felt in one way or another. Even as President Trump moves swiftly to restore sanctions and put Iran on notice that its nuclear activity and global adventurism will not be tolerated, those billions cannot be recovered, and the Iranians have already spent a great deal for their jihad cause.

However this catastrophe plays out, there is one man who will suffer no consequences whatsoever: Barack Obama. That’s Leftist Privilege. It’s good to be a powerful Leftist in Washington nowadays. Laws? Pah! Laws are for conservatives.

================

When will Black Osama be charged with ANY crime?!?!?!

;-/