From:
http://sheikyermami.com/2016/06/its-all-so-terribly-unfair/
Despite warnings from many people that this huge immigration into Europe that we see now, had to be planned on a high level, very few would listen. Instead those who insisted that something was fishy were called conspiracy nutters and paranoid. But when the UN chief of migration, Peter Sutherland (pictured), openly states what is on the table, what the plan is for Europe, the conspiracies suddenly become truth, as many originally far-fetched conspiracies do.
Peter Sutherland, who is UN migration chief & chairman at Goldman Sachs bank, wants to use (Muslim) immigration to destroy European countries’ culture. Here is what BBC
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-18519395
... reported:
“The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.
Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.
He also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.
He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.
He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.
This was actually the plan already years ago, and ISIS, who has less brains combined than a football team, could never come up with, and executed such a large-scale plan. The terrorist organization is simply successfully exploiting it by sending terrorists along with migrants and refugees.
Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development
http://www.gfmd.org/process/annual-themes
... which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas. The organization has had 7 international meetings so far, and had its first one in 2007.
The 7th meeting was held in Stockholm, Sweden (imagine that) on 14 to 16 May 2014, where the theme was: “Unlocking the Potential of Migration for Inclusive Development.”
And the 8th meeting will be held in Istanbul, Turkey on 14-16 October 2015, where the theme will be:
“Strengthening Partnerships: Human Mobility for Sustainable Development.”.
The agenda for a New World Order, often referred to as NWO, most people reject as a conspiracy. This despite former US President George H.W. Bush’s speech of exactly the plan for a NWO. Now, combine the above and the video below, and the conspiracy starts to make sense, huh?
Of course there will be conflicts throughout Europe at some point. It will be a clash of civilizations, and most likely it is something that has been calculated into the plan. Reduction of the population is surely going to happen. It is inevitably in conflicts. Then the UN Peace Keeping forces will swoop in, patrolling in Europe, and the UN is half way there, policing us.
The US however, is (at the moment) a different matter. Citizens are armed and can protect themselves.
At least so far. But it won’t last. Disarmament of the US population is an important goal for the Obama administration (and the UN), and it’s fast approaching. And if you thought that amendments and laws can’t be changed, take a look at Europe, China, Russia, and most countries, where only the criminals carry, illegally.
NWO is a plan, not so much a conspiracy anymore, and it’s being executed now.
But don’t take my word for it. Instead listen:
https://youtu.be/txukr5zgHnw
There is very little we can do about it. When the elite decides upon something, it is imposed upon us whatever we say or do. Unless there is an “European spring”, but that is not likely to happen. We are both too lazy and ignorant, and most of us refuse to even pay attention to stuff like this. Like herded sheep, watching “American Idol” and football. Grassing on the field till the herder calls.
"Lamb chops for dinner…!"
FURTHER:
The UN’s Special Representative for International Migration, Peter Sutherland, demands corrective action:
Some of Sutherland’s fellow losers think a petition might help:
Thursday’s referendum saw 17.4 million (51.9 per cent) votes cast to leave the EU, compared with 16.1 million (48.1 per cent) for remaining part of the bloc, with a turnout of 72.2 per cent, according to the Electoral Commission.
In response, more than 2.6 million people have signed an online petition calling for the Government to implement a rule that ‘if the Remain or Leave vote is less than 60 per cent based on a turnout less than 75 per cent, there should be another referendum’.
These people are ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment