The largest Canadian province has passed a law that gives rights to the government to take away children from families that don’t accept their kid’s chosen “gender identity” or “gender expression”.
The law, which replaces old laws governing child protection, foster care and adoption services, instructs all child services and judges, to take into consideration a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”
Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said “I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently.”
“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”
The old law used to allow parents to “direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” The new bill, however, amends such rights of the parents.
It now emphasizes a child’s “identity and allows parents only to “direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing, in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”
Ontario children and youth advocate Irwin Elman celebrated the bill and said it signals a “paradigm shift” and creates a “child-centered system of service” with “the commitment to anti-racism and children’s rights.”
Jack Fonseca, a political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, meanwhile, criticized the new law.
“With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history. Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”
The child services in Ontario, Canada got into hot water back in April after it removed two foster children from a Christian couple’s home because they said no to lying to the girls that the Easter bunny is real, The Christian Post reported.
Derek Baars, one of the foster parents, said “We have a no-lying policy” after being told by a child support worker that they must tell the girls, aged 3 and 4, that the Easter bunny is real because it’s an important part of Canadian culture.
“We explained to the agency that we are not prepared to tell the children a lie. If the children asked, we would not lie to them, but we wouldn’t bring it up ourselves,” he added.
=======
Children are by definition legally "non-compus mentis" but then again so are all liberals, who always push feelings over facts. Any such "laws" are nothing more than child-abuse and any courts or cops who enforce them are criminals.
All libertine "liberals" are delinquent to the Golden Rule of Law "Do Not Attack First" responsibility; all liberal positivist "laws" = crimes.
EVERY ONE of these categories is false as in being above a child's comprehension level: “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”
A child MAY be capable of noticing it's own colour &/or ('race') but not its (tribal or 'ethnic') ancestry, place of origin, citizenship, "family diversity" (whatever that means; colour again maybe?) disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.
In fact, by condoning and indulging whatever "sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression" a (by definition) non-compus-mentis child's opinion may only temporarily be, over the basic facts, one is in fact abusing that child by NOT dis-abusing them of their fantasy feelings in favour of the objective facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment