Even though we totally disagree on some main points (his infamous Jew-hatred, for instance, my constant challenging of which got me banned from his site forever - which is ironic as he now complains about being censored himself LOL) he's still a good writer and right more than he's left ... er, I mean, wrong!
"You might have heard that the major tech companies have been censoring political views that they don’t like. I was permanently banned from every major social media and payment platform last year, along with a bunch of other alt right types. Others received more subtle forms of censorship, like Diamond & Silk who found out their content was deemed “unsafe” and demoted, only after complaining to Facebook about a sudden drop in audience engagement. Dennis Prager had his videos censored on YouTube and just a few days later, on Facebook as well. Several Republican congressmen found out via Vice News that Twitter was demoting their content, supposedly based on some sort of algorithm. More recently, Alex Jones got the Christopher Cantwell treatment, as he was banned from all the major platforms in a matter of days.
If you’re not stupid, you’ve probably already figured out that this is an effort to influence the upcoming midterm elections which, at the time of this writing, are just 52 days away. Even if the federal government acts to stop this manipulation, there is nothing they can do to undo the damage that has been done. The Democrats will go into this election with a very distinct advantage, and if they regain any measure of power, they will use it to make sure this problem is not fixed.
Not long ago, Democrats and their accomplices called us conspiracy theorists for saying this, but it is becoming more difficult to deny by the day.
A leaked email composed by Google’s former head of “multicultural marketing” details a range of efforts to increase Latino voter turnout. This was supposedly a “non-partisan” effort in which they “followed our company’s protocols for the elections strategy”. But their intent was revealed to be anything but, when they expressed shock and dismay that so many Latinos voted for Donald Trump. “Ultimately, after all was said and one [sic], the Latino community did come out to vote, and completely surprised us. We never anticipated that 29% of Latinos would vote for Trump. No one did,” the executive wrote.
Trump’s victory resulted in a company meeting at Google. A video of that meeting was recently leaked, and provides us with the clearest evidence to date of Google’s purposeful manipulation of search results and other uses of “the great strength and resources and reach we have” to “advance really important values”. Other highlights include Eileen Naughton, VP of People Operations, promising that Google’s policy team in DC is “all over” the immigration issue and that the company will “keep a close watch on it.” Sergey Brin praises an audience member’s suggestion of increasing matched Google employee donations to progressive groups. Brin also compares Trump voters to “extremists,” arguing for a correlation between the economic background of Trump supporters and the kinds of voters who back extremist movements. Brin says that “voting is not a rational act” and that not all of Trump’s support can be attributed to “income disparity.” He suggests that Trump voters might have been motivated by boredom rather than legitimate concerns. VP for Global Affairs Kent Walker, says Google must ensure the rise of populism doesn’t turn into “a world war or something catastrophic … and instead is a blip, a hiccup.” A Google employee states: “speaking to white men, there’s an opportunity for you right now to understand your privilege” and urges employees to “go through the bias-busting training, read about privilege, read about the real history of oppression in our country.”
Of course, none of this should have come as any surprise to anyone who was paying attention. The Silicon Valley fat cats have long confessed to being leftists. They fire anyone who dares to voice right of center political views. They censor every right winger they can get away with censoring. They team up with the SPLC and ADL to police “offensive content” while telling employees of their company that they find the election of Donald Trump offensive.
In 2016, The Intercept reported that Google had created a remarkable partnership with the Obama White House, providing expertise, services, advice, and personnel for vital government projects. Google representatives attended White House meetings more than once a week, on average, from the beginning of Obama’s presidency through October 2015. Nearly 250 people have shuttled from government service to Google employment or vice versa over the course of his administration.
No other public company approaches this degree of intimacy with government.
(Oh really, Chris? I guess Goldman Sachs isn't a public company, then - my bad)!
;-)
This changed after Trump got elected. Suddenly, Google did not want to help the United States anymore. Google had a contract with the Defense Department to work on artificial intelligence in an effort called “Project Maven”. That contract expires next year, and Google announced that they would not be renewing it because they were “facing internal pressure”.
But you know who they do want to work with? Hillary Clinton. At least twelve employees from the Clinton Global Initiative, the Clinton Foundation, and the Clinton Health Access Initiative went on to work for Google, while at least fifteen Google employees went on to work for Hillary For America.
Facebook also hired dozens of Clinton or Obama staffers.
Here is a fun experiment, search Google for “transgender” and see how many pages you have to go through before you find something even remotely critical of propagandizing children with ideological horseshit, and pumping them full of puberty blockers until they are old enough to have their genitals mutilated. Pull up Google News and see if any of the sources are from Fox News or Breitbart. Go to Facebook or Twitter and report one of these pages that are calling for the assassination of the President of the United States, and see how long it takes them to tell you this is not a violation of their community standards.
Again, none of this should come as particularly shocking to any Radical Agenda listener. We’ve always known that these people were ideologues who were using their market power to influence government. Wouldn’t you?
There is no such thing as neutral in today’s political environment. Everything has been politicized, and the guy who forgets that forfeits the election. As far as Google, Twitter, and Facebook are concerned, they aren’t censoring us based on ideology or politics. In their minds, there is no other side of the argument, and their standards are mere baseline moral decency. There cannot be any negotiation or coexistence with people like this while we share a system of government. They have to be completely defeated, or they will destroy us."
No comments:
Post a Comment