The Cultural Marxist Education System Explained

Just as Existentialism IS Nihilism, Anarchists ARE communists.

Whether they like it or not, all people are individuals, not groups (of individuals). Many of them can (and do) lie, and endorse the contrary pretense, because, as Brandon Smith noted, “their endgame … is conning the masses into believing that the group mind is real and that the individual mind is fiction.”

Yes, endorsing group rights is all about avoiding individual responsibility, and so they only commit this fraud to induce others to serve them as slaves.

Their posited "group Rights" is really only ever idolatry - an alibi of predestined, predetermined might-makes-right extortive force to excuse their lazy false claims of the right to remain irresponsibly wrong.

The common liberal trope stance today is that not having one’s feelings hurt, trumps risking being offended by the often-painful truth - as if all humans didn’t naturally first react in denial to all new ideas (see Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, Aristotle, and others).

Since they do, it's not the responsibility or right of any other human to short-circuit their natural learning process - of going from fear to hope - by retarding them or allowing them to retard them selves by indulging in their first instinctive response:

"But I don't want to learn that!"

Unfortunately, this is exactly what the corrupt traitors in today's so-called education system are abusing the children in their charge with, by dint of tempting kids with it:

"Remember, kids - there's no wrong answers! Whee!"
Naturally, they ignore the hidden implication: "so then there's no right answers, either!"

Their next step is inevitably to assert it's "unfair!" that other people learn to do things better than they can do them, and to then also insist those others be prevented from learning, too! Knowledge is power, and ambition to learn and perform hard work creates "inequality!" Since they chose not to learn, others' learning is cheating!

Next up, this idolatrous fear of others' thinking and learning is extended and extrapolated to their acquiring goods and services, through dint of trading (scary) hard work for them:

"But I don't want to do that!"

Thieves (extortive "communist" gangsters) like to pretend that, "since resources are finite," then everything other people (aka "The Makers") earn, we're really only 'stealing' from THEIR (unearned) share! (We should all get equal shares in everything without working for/earning or otherwise paying for them - right?)!

Nor should any other people be allowed to increase their shares of goods through dynamic "economics," for instance by trading labour and services for them. "That would be bad," because it creates "inequality."

Everyone must remain at the lowest common denominator of both education and number of possessions.

There should be no individual property rights. That is the only way the idolaters GROUP can feel "safe."

Do it for the good of the gang - sacrifice your life to be and remain part of the Greater Good. And all groups need a leader - so that would be ME, they presume, as all crime-gangsters do. Might makes right!

Lazy people (criminals such as them selves) who want rights without responsibilities, to remain irresponsibly wrong, and entitled to their shares without working for them, should be able to halt and reverse the economic choices of those who, like themselves, become "victims" by agreeing to trade their share of the finite resources to those who are willing to trade work for them. Theft is good, and so communism (gangster extortion and theft) is naturally formed from the puerile anarchists' selfish desires.

They pretend there is no free-will choice, so those who agree to trade possessions for work, were really only taken advantage of by those sneaky evil greedy selfish "capitalists." Those 1%ers should have to give it back.

In short, they presume that they are automatically entitled to a one in seven billionth equal share of everything anyone else mines, hunts, traps, or builds on earth - they're entitled to one in seven billionth of my salary (as, unfortunately, am I) but since they don't work, they're ahead of the "game."

They realize large groups of other people already exist, so they want in on that action - they want to encourage other lazy Takers to form into gangs to extort the Makers into giving them free stuff.

They want to destroy the collective insurance companies called "Governments" their parents built up with their blood, sweat, and treasure, to tear them down and then re-built them, but this time with them in charge.

They want to offload their responsibilities onto groups of other people, to dilute them via group rights and in order to sell their fraud to others, they inevitably, and invariably must resort to groupthink idolatry.

This is both how and why lying Anarchists (who exist to tear down others' groups, aka government) are NOT Libertarians (who are the Makers, and as such, only want to literally mind their own businesses).

But, as their anarcho-Marxism is all total nonsense, what are their real, underlying, psychologically "dysfunctional" motives? SIMPLE!

Here's how the so-called "soft" sciences aka "humanities" (anthropology, psychology, sociology, and even Law or criminology) really work: They all started off by examining the various symptoms and EFFECTS of human behavior, thinking, group-thinking behavior, and of criminal free-will CHOICES, respectively, but then self-invalidated by looking for hidden mysterious predestined and predetermined inevitable force "CAUSES" of it all, which degraded them all into only one criminal, excuse-making alibi topic: "VICTIMOLOGY!" So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles: Law-abiding Conservatives: "Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!" Criminal libertines: "But what CAUSED that choice? There's always a cause!" Their implication is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we're all "victims." In short: they went from studying HOW people CHOOSE to act, to focusing on WHY (ruling out free will choice entirely)! And that "why" PRESUMES a fear of pain will ALWAYS trump rationality! "So" we are all really ever only helpless victims! Asking "why" people ('always') give in to the fear of pain, presumes that: "SINCE anything CAN go wrong, SO it WILL always go wrong, SO we MUST forgive everyone for their mistakes, as being helpless victims!" But in reality, the only reason WHY people commit crimes, is that they still think they can have rights without responsibilities, and so they weigh all the risks and rewards in different situational circumstances first! And they only try to do so in each and every separate circumstantial situation, because they haven't learned that rights ALWAYS only come with responsibilities, causes with effects, and effects with causes, and so they either remain ignorant of, or choose to ignore, the simple Golden Rule of Law moral Principle: "Do Not Attack First." BOTTOM LINE: These days, uselessly PITYING the victims (and the criminals AS "fellow victims,") is held up as the highest moral virtue, while being usefully ANGRY at, (or "hateful" towards) criminals and crime is deemed to be the most vile sin. But what is more useful in solving problems and remedying crime: being angry at criminals for their predatory choices, or encouraging them to commit more crimes, by pitying them as helpless victims too? The answer is obvious. Hope is NOT a Plan. But (beyond keeping the masses controlled by shaming them into giving up their right to get angry at oppressors, by tricking them into substituting useless static pity for useful dynamic anger) the motto of all governments everywhere will always remain "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - AGAIN!" So it's high time to educate these higher-learning "educators" of their mistakes! In always asking "But WHY?" like perverse little children bedevilling their parents, they can always step back any given answer and exploit it into a whole new and lucrative "specialized" academic field of study! But the focus they pretend to thereby gain in minutae actually loses the focus on the big picture or "unified field" of science itself - by deliberately reducing everything they become absurd, or "reducio ad absurdum," to the Latins. And, while the simple answer IS obvious to us, unfortunately so is their own criminally negligent desire to "fail upwards" by ignoring the simple easy and permanent solutions to any and all problems, in favor of exploiting and selling the almost infinite number of mere symptoms and effects of unsolved problems as causes in them selves, as eternal crises for which only temporary band-aid therapy reliefs can ever be applied. After all, the motto of all responsibility-averse and willfully delinquent libertine "liberal" criminals must be: "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - AGAIN!" So their final message these days seems to be: "Anyone who doesn't automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!"