HERE'S HOW AND WHY OUR SOCIETY GOT CORRUPTED AND IS HEADED FOR OUR GENOCIDE:

The whole notion of "mental illness" is false, and exploited by the "mental illness/wellness industry" hypocrites to enshrine them selves as much-needed "expert authorities" over others as the modern world's high-priests of the 'diseased victim' model of society. It's excuse-making "victimology" is one of the main and most prevalent causes of 'cultural' corruption today.* These high priests absolve our people - even our naive and helpless children! - of all personal self-reliant free-will choices and responsibility, as they lay waste to their brains and quality of life by drugging them into state-sponsored submission. of course this instantly leads to a societal lethargy and inability to protect our selves from being genocided by globalists - as even our so-called elected leaders instantly cave in to mere pity for the lesser races, as if evolution and nature itself were somehow the fault of white men, simply for having placed us in a relative but imperfect position of superiority over others. Those placed in charge of solving problems are not automatically the cause of those problems simply because they are in charge! But they can certainly exploit the almost infinite symptoms of not solving those problems!

_____
 *In past times, the pay-for-pity (aka "mercy;" "forgiveness;" "tolerance;" sympathy;" "empathy;" and "altruism") industry was controlled by the church, commanding us to pity each other, or God wouldn't let us into Heaven.

=========== 

Today's legal "system" (i.e: the judges and lawyers involved in judging other people) has long been corrupted by an over-indulgence in the useless and mostly false emotion of "pity." This is not good for anyone, especially white men (see also 'feminism' and 'racism'). It is a shallow cop-out and abdication of their oaths of office (i.e: to fairly and dispassionately use not their emotions, but their rational powers of judgment to discern truth by using reason and logic to assess facts, not feelings) and to renege on their contracted-for and paid duties to serve each and every member of the public equally, not to cater to their own most shallow impulses to always pre-judge men as always the aggressors simply because they are on average naturally larger stronger faster and more intelligent than others. ....... "Pity" (aka "sympathy;" "empathy," "mercy;" "tolerance" and "forgiveness") itself is a virtue-signaling cop-out; it really only ever means "You're screwed, but I'm not, so I can feel relief while still also feeling a sad, diluted version of fear for you." To indulge it risks automatically engaging in criminal "corruption:" 'Corruption' is when authorities virtue-signal their pity for criminals as equally-helpless fellow victims in stead of punishing them for their free-will criminal choices to attack thereby innocent other people first, in order to selfishly look good, avoid future conflicts and renege on their own oaths of office. But this choice always really ever only 'splits the difference' by offloading half of the blame onto the victims, thus adding additional insulting injuries to them, while absolving the criminals of at least half of their culpability, in an effort to go along (with the usual criminal lies, that they are in fact equally-helpless victims, and not really criminals) to get along (with the scary lying criminals). In short, it is to become complicit, willing accessories in the criminals' crimes, helping to enable those crimes, just to look 'good!' ... Corruption is when any "authority" (say, a 'judge' in court of law) routinely embraces subjective double standards and virtue-signals emotion (usually pity and its synonyms like mercy, tolerance, forgiveness, sympathy and empathy, etc) over logic reason rationality facts and truth for merely selfish reasons, such as wanting to gratify one's ego by seeming to be the reasonable good guy - in short, enabling crime and criminality by automatically pre-forgiving criminals, helping them to escape justice by embracing their excuses, which are usually some form of the "diseased victims"/"mental illness" view of how life if too complex for anyone to ever really be able to understand causes and effects (if such esoteric speculations even really exist) such that since nobody ever really has the requisite cognitive capacity required for fulfilling the legal 'mens-rea'/guilty mind criminal intent criteria, they are in stead automatically ruled to be equally-helpless victims - of "society"/mere products of their environments, or as their fellow Marxist criminals put it, of "historical predeterminism" and/or proudly helpless slaves of mysterious and unknowably unknown (but also strangely, equally mysteriously somehow knowably known to be 'inevitable') forces such as almighty "allah." ....... There is no such thing as "mental illness" - it's ALL no more or less than common but habitual HYPOCRISY. Pretending our enemies are merely diseased victims instead of criminals determined to choose to attack innocent people first, is to give in to one of their own main favorite excuses: "I didn't do it! My brain made me do it! In fact, I didn't do it at all - only my brain did it! Whee!" ... The 15thC reign of Dracula proved once and for all that all criminals can and will restrain them selves from choosing to attack thereby innocent other people first, when the risks substantially outweigh the rewards. That's an achievement which proves for all time that there are no inevitable "mental illness"-like forces behind "criminality," and so no criminal ever deserves pity. ... I seriously think that most if not all "judges" should never have been appointed! Almost all lawyers are professional hypocrites - that's practically their job description - and almost all judges used to be lawyers! Who wants to be judged by a professional hypocrite who's adept at making up excuses?! Only NON-lawyers should get to be judges, and they should also have to past tests all the time before and during their tenures, too! None of them understand the first thing about the law! ....... Criminality is a "spectrum disorder:" the 'spectrum' is the spread of the almost infinite number of symptoms through which one may choose (if one is criminally negligent and believes there's no money in solutions) to perceive these criminals' intentions: All criminals are hypocrites, and all hypocrites are criminals. Hypocrites are all about double standards, where only they have rights, and no responsibilities, while everyone else has no right to defend themselves from the criminal's hypocritical double standards, but only a responsibility to become and remain their slaves. To them, the ends (promoting them selves while denigrating their "enemies") always justify the means (any and all crimes - because they're not crimes to the hypocrites if and when they are used to defend the hypocrites' self-image, that they are always rights, and everyone else is always wrong). Therefore they are also all "egotists" aka "megalomaniacs," simply because they put them selves first, above all others. They are also all "psycho-paths" (Greek for "thought-killers") because they refuse to hear about any objective facts which could contradict their chosen subjective opinions - that only they are allowed to have rights without responsibilities, and everyone else only has a responsibility to become and remain their slaves, with no rights to defend them selves from them. Ditto for them also all being "schizo-phrenes" (Greek for "split-skulls") for the exact same reason. In short, ALL the so-called "mental illness disorders" only describe the disparate symptoms of chosen criminal hypocrisy. We currently think it takes a committed, habitual hypocrite to effectively oppose other hypocrites, because honest people get distracted from the relentless counter-attacks needed to "win" agaist other hypocrites, by the criminals' own habitual, victim-blaming hypocrisy. Enter the apparent but wholly mistaken 'need' for 'our own' professional hypocrite class, aka "LAWYERS")! And many lawyers then go on to become "politicians" for the same reasons: hypocrites are naturally "good" at adversarial partisanship. Others become "judges" because they are already quite used to promoting them selves above all others' judgment.