How do we save our great nations from maniacal, authoritarian ruling elites?

Believe it or not, there’s actually something worse than the prospect of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris winning the last election and becoming president and vice president of the United States.

 
And that would be for such profoundly unworthy characters to be elevated to the pinnacle of power through fraud – fraud so brazen and clear that everyone knows it (or at least, all 70 million Trump voters know it).
 
To live in a country where half the population is totally convinced their vote doesn’t matter, that elections are rigged – a charade, a pretense, a fig leaf for totalitarianism – and that the ruling elite will install whomever serves their secret anti-American agenda – well, that would be a very unhappy and conflicted nation, one perpetually at war within itself.
 
Thus, President Trump and his legal team are endeavoring to force election misdeeds into the light, and to bring transparency and accountability – and thereby, public trust -- into what is thus far an epically fraud-ridden election.
 
But the truth is, what led us into this terrible situation was yet another massive fraud – one every bit as evil, corrosive and ruinous as election fraud is to a great nation: I’m talking about America’s fraudulent news media. Only today’s Pravda-like press could have enabled someone like Joe Biden – obviously disintegrating mentally, wrong on every issue, lying continually, and as new evidence proves, one of the most spectacularly corrupt politicians in memory – to become the Democratic candidate and very possibly the next president.
 
Tucker Carlson recently commented on the media’s atrocious pre-election bias – from their wanton lying to protect Biden, to their defamation of honest whistleblowers as “Russian disinformation agents,” to their flat-out refusal to cover major stories exposing the Biden family’s monumental corruption. He ended with this prophetic warning:
 
“When the smoke clears from this election, there’ll be a massive realignment in the media, no matter who wins. Because they showed who they are. And it’s so unappealing, it’s so far from journalism, that it can’t continue.”
 
Tucker is correct. No matter how this election disaster ends, the media landscape will be forever changed. Most so-called “mainstream journalists” have disgraced themselves beyond repair, having proven they are no better – and no different – than Pravda, the pretend “newspaper of record” in the former Soviet Union that was actually just a craven, lying, servile propaganda mill for that totalitarian regime’s ruling elite.
 
After all, remember when President Trump disclosed that he and Melania were infected with the Chinese coronavirus? Immediately, the media pounced on him, saying he had it coming. CNN anchor Don Lemon talked about Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi becoming president, and former Barack Obama staffer and Hillary Clinton national spokeswoman Zara Rahim said, "I hope he dies." Right before that, The Atlantic, which had recently published a high-profile libelous story claiming President Trump hates and mocks war heroes, published a second, similar high-profile libelous story claiming Trump hates and mocks Christians.
 
Enough! As Tucker said, this insanity “can’t continue.” Americans won’t stand for it.
 
Thus, whatever the future holds after this election, Americans are going to need, more than ever before, a truly moral and courageous “free press” to help everyone navigate what promises to be a tumultuous, dangerous and unpredictable era ahead.

But right now, the globalist shills of the "mainstream" enemedia covers up the truth - about Joe Biden’s decades-long family corruption, serial plagiarism, continual lying, dismal half-century track record, growing dementia and more. The truth about Kamala Harris being rated by the nonpartisan GovTrack.us as the most leftwing member of the U.S. Senate – further left than Bernie Sanders – not to mention being one of the most dishonest, vacuous, insincere, abrasive, condescending and excruciatingly unlikeable candidates for high office in our lifetimes. The truth about the Chinese coronavirus – about what real science actually says about masks, about lockdowns, about medications like hydroxychloroquine, about school openings, about the importance of early treatment and much more. The truth about Hillary Clinton being the actual villain at the heart of the whole Trump-Russia collusion hoax. And much more – including the truth about America’s “mainstream media” having morphed fully into the militant, continually-lying propaganda wing of the Democratic Party.

But WND has been busy warning America for over three years – longer than virtually any other journalists, since shortly after the 2016 election – that Big Tech intended to crush conservative expression and to do everything within their power, moral or immoral, legal or illegal, to prevent Donald Trump’s re-election. They’re doing precisely that right now, and WND is in danger of being mortally wounded in this war.

Recently, three major international online ad companies that had long served ads on WND – their main source of revenue and sustenance – all suddenly decided, at the same time, to cancel WND in the run-up to the most important presidential election of our lifetimes. The ad companies blacklisting WND – namely, TripleLift, AppNexus/Xander and Teads – all cited vague breaches of their terms of service (i.e. “any content that is illegal or otherwise contrary to any applicable law, regulation, directive, guideline or order, including without limitation any misleading, unethical, obscene, defamatory, deceptive, gambling-related or hateful content,” etc.). You get the idea: If they don’t like your politics, you’re cancelled.
 
Even worse than losing key ad companies: A few months ago Facebook suddenly decided to massively suppress WND’s traffic on their platform – which forms a key part of WNDs overall reader engagement, since WND has close to a million Facebook friends. Why is Facebook massively suppressing WND? No reason given, despite repeated attempts to find out. As a result, WND’s overall traffic, and therefore our revenue, is down significantly and painfully from what it was before.
 
Meanwhile, Google has virtually written WND out of its search algorithm so that unless you specify “WND.com” in your search terms, WND rarely shows up. The Southern Poverty Law Center, the leftwing hate group that many Big Tech companies rely on to identify hate groups, characterizes WND as a hate group – specifically, one engaging in “manipulative fear-mongering and outright fabrications designed to further the paranoid, gay-hating, conspiratorial and apocalyptic visions … from the fringes of the far-right and fundamentalist worlds.” 

- David Kupelian, WND -

In other words: "Oh noes - logic-based objective fact-noticing ebil "conservatives" - they might know! So shut it down now!"

... so whether those naive little lambs over at WND really do know it yet, or not - they are being sacrificed to "The G*ds."

https://wndnewscenter.nationbuilder.com/support_wnd_news_center

ISLAM IS COMING - The Cox and Amess Murders - A Tale of Two Political Assassinations How far will the responses diverge?

ISLAM IS COMING!

"The United Kingdom has been rocked by the stabbing murder of David Amess, a British member of parliament who was targeted at his regular ‘surgery’ (community engagement meeting) in Leigh-on-Sea, southeast of London.

The murder of Amess sparked immediate comparisons with the killing of another MP, Jo Cox, in Birstall, West Yorkshire on the 16th of June 2016. Like Amess, Cox was also seeing constituents and died after being shot and stabbed by a man named Thomas Mair. Mair is currently serving a life sentence for the murder.

Like the latest killing, Cox’s murder sent shock-waves through the UK. Perhaps even more so, as it took place in the run-up to the referendum on whether the United Kingdom should remain or leave the European Union. This was perhaps one of the most politically divisive events in recent British history.

The reaction of the liberal establishment to Cox’s murder was revealing. While Mair had a long history of mental health problems, this was swept aside in favour of an obsessive focus on his right wing political connections. While this was on some level understandable, Mair did indeed have a whole range of questionable ideological commitments. What was less understandable was that Mair, who lived his life on the radical fringe, was immediately elevated to a representative and poster boy for the whole Brexit movement (i.e. those who wanted the UK to leave the EU).

No matter that Mair was a loner, with questionable mental health, who acted alone. According to some of the ‘Remain’ side, the Brexit movement had to ‘own’ him. No ‘bad apple’ excuses allowed. As commentator, Bart Cammaerts, wrote: “It is, as far as I’m concerned, way too easy and above all misleading to depict the murder of Jo Cox as the despicable act of a mentally deranged loner which has nothing to do with the Brexit-campaign or with the way in which this campaign stirred and instrumentalised xenophobic hatred in this country. The Brexit-campaign has unleashed and normalised something dark and sinister in British society and the murder of Jo Cox is just one manifestation of this.” In other words, if you supported the sovereignty of the United Kingdom, this was on you, no matter who you are.

Which brings us to Amess’ murder. We know by now that his killer was a 25 year-old member of the Somali community. The UK police also declared the murder a ‘terror attack’. This makes it very likely that the killing was motivated by the ‘prophet’ Muhammad’s injunction to ‘strike the necks of the unbelievers’ (Qur’an 8:12). So logically we can expect, if the principle of communal responsibility so vociferously asserted after Cox’s murder is upheld, that there will now be calls for the Muslim community to engage in deep introspection on how they can prevent these kinds of attackers from emerging from their midst. Don’t hold your breath though.

Statements of communal guilt and calls for introspection are seemingly only allowed in one direction. Especially when it comes to the Muslim community, such calls are firmly on the wrong side of a ‘Don’t go there!’ sign. So expect endless statements about a ‘lone wolf attack’ and analyses of how the perpetrator’s mental health or alienation from society caused him to fly into a murderous rage. Statements along these lines will, no doubt, be garnished by the reminder that only a ‘tiny minority of extremists’ go on to do such a thing and that Amess’ murder most assuredly had ‘nothing to do with Islam’. Never mind that the ISIS magazine, Dabiq, called for precisely these kinds of attacks, explicitly basing this call on the teachings of the ‘prophet’ Muhammad.

The worst thing about all of this is not the obvious and ridiculous double standard. It is also the fact that it leaves an ideology that ultimately endangers all of those who do not subscribe to the teachings of Islam free from serious scrutiny.

ISLAMOCRITES AND LEFTOPATHS, OH MY!

I wish I could say that I’m convinced that this will be a teachable moment, causing an intense investigation of the links between orthodox Islamic teaching and violence. Unfortunately, what is far more likely to happen is that the very people who were willing to convict their political opponents for complicity in the murder in the death of Jo Cox will work extra hard to ensure that cover is provided for the community from which the latest assassin of a UK politician emerged."

Kind regards,

Peter Townsend, author of Nothing To Do With Islam

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nothing-Islam-Investigating-Wests-Dangerous-ebook/dp/B01FWVFHFE