Saturday, July 25, 2015

Taqiyya Template Terminated!

The common liberal trope stance today is that not having one’s feelings hurt, trumps risking being offended by the often-painful truth - as if all humans didn’t naturally first react in denial to all new ideas (see Elizabeth Kubler-Ross and others). Since they do, it's not the responsibility or right of any other human to short-circuit their natural learning process - of going from fear to hope - by retarding them or allowing them to retard them selves by indulging in their first instinctive response: "But I don't want to learn that!" 
Unfortunately, this is exactly what the corrupt traitors in today's so-called education system are abusing the children in their charge with, by dint of tempting kids with it:
"Remember, kids - there's no wrong answers! Whee!"
;-(
But islam can be easily studied and known in its entirety, by anyone. It will never change!
So, when Western people won’t educate them *selves* about islam because our culture defers all thinking to those “authorities” we PAY to do our thinking and research for us, while they secretly know full-well that the salesmen in charge will always sell us all out, they ARE CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT INFANTILE DELINQUENT TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY AND CIVILIZATION!
It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!
No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and nobody is doing even these muslims any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed “People Of Colour”)!
Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.
Keeping the muzzie masses ignorant of their own hate-crime death-threat canon seems to be the self-imposed mission of most of the enemedia, government and of course their corporazi owners these days – it’s most likely why they keep lying about islam being a “great religion of peace” all the time! That, and their inherent racism, of course!
We wouldn’t want any of these poor oppressed mentally-inferior swarthy holy-mobster criminals to suffer any “blowback” retaliation (i.e: JUSTICE) for their crimes, now, would we?
Anyway, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller deconstructed one of the most vile recent  muslim attempts at proselytizing to our children, by slandering them all as hatefully bigoted racists, in a teen magazine today!
From HERE:

Proselytizing for and whitewashing Islam in…Teen Vogue

JULY 24, 2015 9:22 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER47 COMMENTS
Over at PamelaGeller.com, I discuss yet another sly exercise in Islamic proselytizing slipped into a forum that would have no space for a similar presentation from any other religious group:
Teen Vogue is just that: a magazine for teenage girls. Articles featured on its front page today include “Justin Bieber and Sam Smith Are Already Listening to Tori Kelly’s New Album, and You Should Be, Too”; “The 35 Coolest Back-to-School Backpacks”; “7 Desserts That Require No Baking At All”; “The Complete Guide to Washing Your Makeup Brushes — Yes, You Need To”; and the immortal “I Understand My Period, But What’s Coming Out Of Me The Other Three Weeks of the Month?” In that company, “10 Misconceptions About Islam That Muslim Americans Are Tired of Hearing” stands out like Hillary Clinton at a Tea Party meeting, and manifests the indefatigable determination of Muslims to proselytize anywhere and everywhere they can, as well as the naive multiculturalism of Leftist publishers and editors who give them a platform to speak positively about their religion that they would never offer to Jews or Christians or any other religious group.
This piece, like so many others of its kind, packages its proselytizing in the guise of clearing up “misconceptions” that people supposedly have about Islam, and follows the pattern of other articles like it in presenting some “misconceptions” that no one really holds and are entirely innocuous anyway amidst others that are more or less straight proselytizing and outright deception designed to keep Americans — even those far more concerned about Kendall Jenner and Katy Perry than about Mohammad Abdulazeez and Usaama Rahim — ignorant and complacent about the jihad threat.
And it starts, unsurprisingly, with a highly questionable anecdote that situates Muslims firmly as victims, and smears opponents of jihad terror as bigots:
10 Misconceptions About Islam That Muslim Americans Are Tired of Hearing,” by Hishaam Siddiqi, Teen Vogue, July 6, 2015:
Can you grab that bottle of Sriracha on the top shelf?” my mother asked, as we made our way down the “ethnic” aisle at our local grocery store. It was around 5:30pm, my father was almost home from work, and my mother and I were out getting last minute ingredients for dinner. As we waited in the checkout line, waiting to pay for our goods, I hear a voice behind me, “You here to steal something?”
I turn around to find a tall man, broad shoulders, a baseball cap pulled low over his forehead, looking straight at my mother. I stand there bewildered, wondering if this was an acquaintance of hers trying to be funny or make some sort of weird joke.
Are you here to blow something up? Why are you wearing that?” he barks again, referring to my mother’s hijab and abaya. At this point, everyone within earshot tenses up and I find myself flooding with both embarrassment and panic. What was this guy trying to get at? We were just at the grocery store trying to get home on time, and this man, who we had never seen before, was going out of his way to harass my mother.
Unfortunately, this wasn’t an isolated incident. My mother, petite as she may be, has no problem holding her own and isn’t new to being singled out and hassled for her choice of Islamic clothing. She clearly and eloquently explained her religious garb to the man, told him to not yell at her, and swiftly sent him on his way.
Note the semaphores: “the ‘ethnic’ aisle at our local grocery store” — America is intrinsically racist, “otherizing” racial and religious minorities in innumerable ways large and small, even to the point of labeling an aisle containing food that Muslims eat the “ethnic” aisle, as if it is not quite American. “Baseball cap pulled low over his forehead” — a racist, redneck yahoo. “A tall man, broad shoulders…My mother, petite as she may be” — Muslims are weak, small, endangered victims of monstrous, hulking bullies. “Are you here to blow something up? Why are you wearing that?” — only idiots who do things like berate strangers in supermarkets are concerned about Islamic terrorism. “Unfortunately, this wasn’t an isolated incident. My mother, petite as she may be, has no problem holding her own and isn’t new to being singled out and hassled for her choice of Islamic clothing.” — Muslims are routinely subjected to this kind of treatment, you see. And while there may indeed exist baseball cap-wearing louts who bark at petite hijabis in the ethnic aisle, although I highly doubt it, the claim that this anecdote represents a general tendency is belied by FBI hate crime statistics that show that anti-Jewish hate crimes are over four times more common than anti-Muslim hate crimes — but you don’t see Jews whining in Teen Vogue about creeps who yelled at them in a supermarket.
Growing up, I’ve had plenty of these experiences. Whether it was strange looks at my mother or jokes about my Arabic name, life as a Muslim in post 9/11 America isn’t the cutest feeling. The constant villainization of Muslims in mainstream media makes it difficult to do even simple things such as buy groceries or get through airport security without crude jokes or dangerous assumptions, and with the murder of three innocent Muslim kids in Chapel Hill this past year, it’s clear that stereotyping can lead to even fatal consequences.
The constant villainization of Muslims in mainstream media”? What? Where? When? Has Siddiqi never heard of Christiane Amanpour or Niraj Warikoo or Lisa Wangsness or Manya Brachear or a thousand other mainstream media “journalists” who do their utmost to whitewash Islamic jihad terror and to “villainize” those who oppose it? Is there even a single instance of this “villainization” to which she could honestly point? The mainstream media goes out of its way to distance Islam and jihad from terrorism, and seizes upon every possible opportunity to present Muslims and Islam in a positive light. This claim that Muslims are “villainized” in the media is designed to inhibit even further any honest reporting about jihad terror activity.
There is actually no evidence whatsoever that the murder of the Muslims in Chapel Hill was motivated by hatred of Muslims. The fact that Hishaam Siddiqi (along with many other Muslim writers these days) refers to it reveals how rarely Muslims are really victimized: instead of being able to point to an actual murder inspired by anti-Muslim hatred, they keep having to point to this one, in which the victims happened to be Muslim but their religion had nothing to do with why they were murdered. This is because there aren’t any murders inspired by anti-Muslim hatred.
Fortunately we live in the age of technology and open information—we don’t always have to be victims of ignorance and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Misconceptions can be overcome with a simple but powerful thing, knowledge: here are ten common misconceptions about Islam and Muslims to help you break the cycle.
No one wants to be ignorant and hateful, or to be thought of as such. In this connection, remember the supermarket racist’s question: “Are you here to blow something up?” To be concerned about Muslims because of jihad terrorism, you see, is ignorant and hateful. And now Hishaam Siddiqi helpfully provides the antidote.
1. Muslim women have no rights
This is definitely a hot-topic and complicated issue but one of my favorite misconceptions to tackle. It’s important to realize the difference between cultural influences and religious policy. Many countries across the world, including Muslim countries, have patriarchal cultures (cultures in which men are automatically assumed to lead), which are often socially constructed and influenced by the traditions, gender roles, and practices of that culture. Islam as a religion, however, preaches equality of the sexes. There are many Muslim women who have made great accomplishments in the fields of science, entertainment, academia, art, and politics—just this year, Ameenah Gurib-Fakim, a professor of biology, became president of Muslim majority African country Mauritius!
It’s a common Islamic apologist’s claim that the mistreatment of women in Muslim countries is due to culture, not Islam, but this is absurd on its face. Islam is an all-encompassing system, covering every aspect of life. Does Hishaam Siddiqi expect us to believe that in countries where it has been firmly entrenched for nearly 1,400 years, it hasn’t had any effect on the culture? On the contrary: in such countries, Islam is the culture. And while the claim that “Muslim women have no rights” is an overstated straw man, the mistreatment of women in Islamic countries is firmly rooted in Islam. The Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” (2:223). It declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” (2:282). It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3). It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children’s (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” (4:11). Worst of all, the Qur’an tells husbands to beat their disobedient wives: “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them” (4:34). It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” (65:4).
2. Muslims worship a different God
A lot of people think Allah is a specific Islamic deity, but really it just means ‘god’ in Arabic. Christian Arabs even use the word Allah when referring or praying to God. And since Islam is an Abrahamic religion, Muslims believe Allah is the same God who Jesus, Moses, and other biblical prophets all prayed to.
This is a proselytizing point, based on the Qur’an (29:46, which says that Muslims worship the same deity as that of Jews and Christians). It is designed simply to mitigate the strangeness of Islam that many feel, arising from the huge amount of violence done in its name and in accord with its teachings.
3. Islam doesn’t mix with other religions Again, it’s important to make the distinction between the behavior of various cultures and politics of countries compared to actual religious theology. Islam is an Abrahamic religion, which is in the same family of religions as Judaism and Christianity. All three of the religions share many similarities, including important religious figures, historical events, and spiritual beliefs. In fact, Muslims are religiously required to believe in Jesus as a divine prophet. There have been numerous periods of history throughout the Middle East where Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived together for centuries.
as long as the Jews and Christians knew their place, and paid the jizya, a Qur’an-specified poll tax, “with willing submission,” and felt themselves “subdued” (Qur’an 9:29). If, on the other hand, Jews and Christians refused to be subservient, they were massacred — as in the murder of 4,000 Jews in Granada in 1066, following the appointment of a Jewish vizier over the city, which Muslims believed violated the Qur’anic imperative that Jews must be subjugated.
4. Muslims must engage in Jihad, also known as holy-war
This misconception was a huge buzzword right after 9/11 and still does come up every now and then. A lot of people misconstrue Jihad to be a religious agenda to wage war, and is often cited as the reasoning for much of fringe Islamic extremism. However, Jihad doesn’t necessarily mean holy-war, it means to simply struggle for God—an overwhelming majority of Muslims are nonviolent and unfairly lumped with Islamic extremists. Jihad, as most Muslims see it, can include anything from wearing a head scarf to school even though you get teased for it to setting aside allowance money to donate. While fighting for your religious beliefs can be a form of jihad, the term itself refers to any sort of struggle to do good.
This explanation doesn’t even attempt to claim that jihad warfare is not jihad. It just posits that there are other forms of jihad as well. So what? If they don’t compel jihad warriors to stop killing Infidels, they are of no interest to Infidels.
5. Sharia Law is taking over the United States
I always roll my eyes at this one. Sharia law is the theory of Islamic law, derived from centuries old religious and historical texts, which outlines things such as how to settle finances after divorce, the legality of adoption, social etiquette, economics, and other spiritual topics. Almost every time I’ve heard the word Sharia Law on the news, it’s been fear mongering that’s had little to nothing to do with the actual body of laws. There’s no broad Islamic drive to push religious laws onto other political systems.
The Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” — “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America,” by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.
6. All Muslims are Arabs
Couldn’t be further from the truth! Out of the 1.6 billion Muslims living worldwide, over 60% of them are from South and South East Asia, with Indonesia being the most populous Muslim country, followed by Pakistan. In the United States, the largest Muslim demographic is African-American followed by South Asian. Not all Arabs are Muslims either—many Arab countries have very large and historic Christian and Jewish populations.
This one is completely unimportant, and probably only included to reinforce the contention that only racist, ignorant yahoos care about jihad terror.
7. Muslim women are forced to cover up
Although Islamic teachings do require women to dress modestly, how a woman chooses to cover herself and to what degree is under her autonomy. The different ways Muslim women cover varies both religiously (from simple headscarves to full robes) and also culturally, with each region having it’s on take on modest clothing. Unfortunately, many patriarchal societies exploit this and force women to cover in order to systematically subjugate them.
How a woman chooses to cover herself and to what degree is under her autonomy? Really? Tell it to Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it; and to Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab; and to the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and to Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and to Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and to the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and to the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and to the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and to the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and to the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and to the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and to the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and to the women in Iran who protested against the regimeby daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and to the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and to the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home andstarted living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab.
8. Muslims starve for an entire month every year
This one is more of a misunderstanding than a misconception but it always makes me laugh because I hear it every year. Ramadan is a month in which Muslims partake in various charitable and religious activities, most prominent of which is fasting from sunrise to sunset in order to learn humility and appreciate their blessings. But you won’t believe how many people I’ve met who actually think we don’t eat or drink the entire month—not true! Although we do fast for one month, abstaining from food and drink only takes place during daylight hours, which usually ends with a big feast at sunset and way too many people over eating and raiding the fridge at 3am.
But you won’t believe how many people I’ve met who actually think we don’t eat or drink the entire month” — silliness. More ominous is that Siddiqi never mentions that Ramadan, because it is a time when Muslims renew their devotion to Allah, and because jihad is the supreme act of devotion to Allah, is a time of increased jihad terrorism. “The best acts that bring you closer to God are jihad, so hurry to it and make sure to carry out the invasion this holy month and be exposed to martyrdom in it,” so said Islamic State spokesman Abu Mohammed al-Adnani as Ramadan began this year.
9. Muslim Men are encouraged to practice polygamy
This misconception gets brought up a lot but a little historical context helps us better understand. Fourteen hundred years ago, during the rise of Islam, social structures did not provide women with the same assistance as they do today—women needed marriages not just romantically, but also as a means of protection, housing, employment, and tribalism. The law of allowing Muslim men to marry multiple wives was explicitly introduced so as to help widowed and divorced women retain social wellbeing. More importantly, Muslim men are discouraged from marrying more than one wife if they are unable to provide for them equally financially and emotionally. In many Muslim countries, and even Muslim communities here in the West, polygamy is looked down upon and considered an outdated tradition.
In reality, there are as many as 100,000 polygamous Muslim families in the U.S., in clear violation of U.S. law, and Islamic polygamy is not considered an “outdated tradition,” as it is sanctioned in the Qur’an (4:3).
10. Muhammad was the founder of Islam
Historians might consider Muhammad the one who introduced Islam, but Muslims believe Islam to be the same message revealed by Jesus, Moses, and all the other Biblical prophets. Additionally, Muslims do not pray to or worship Muhammad, if anything it is emphasized that he was human just like everyone else.
The same message revealed by Jesus, Moses, and all the other Biblical prophets. See? Nothing to be concerned about, unless you’re a baseball cap-wearing hijabi-harassing boor. So relax, Teen Vogue readers — only hatemongers care to resist Islamic jihad terror. Go back to Justin Bieber, and don’t worry about a thing.

Thanks, Dems! Alinsky Plan Still On Track!

News at never.

Eight Levels Of Control!
 (this is scary)
 
 
 
    Saul Alinsky died about 43 years ago, but his writings influenced those in political control of our nation today.......

    Recall that Hillary did her college thesis on his writings and Obama writes about him in his books.

    Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Ca..
    Education: University of Chicago.
    Spouse: Irene Alinsky
    Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals
    Anyone out there think that this stuff isn't happening today in the U.S.?
    All eight rules are currently in play.
 
    How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky: (Pay attention to his mandate, remember this almost 50 years ago

"There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important".
 
    1) Health care Control health care and you control the people. Hello !
    2) Poverty Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing   everything for them to live. Really ?
    3) Debt Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. Is this not happening as you read this ?
    4) Gun Control Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. This happening, is it not ?
    5) Welfare Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). Is this not fact?
    6) Education Take control of what people read and listen to  take control of what children learn in school. Again, Hello ?
    7) Religion  Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. Thank You ACLU
    8) Class WarfareDivide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take Tax from the wealthy with the support of the poor. Is this not happening?

    Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States?  
Unless you are an idiot, that is exactly what is happening!
    Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule.
    Stalin described his converts as "Useful Idiots." 
    The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control.
    It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.
 
    If people  can read this and still say everything is just fine  they are useful idiots.
 
    It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Pay Attention America, Soros/Obama created this nightmare of fact and clearly the "Lady" seeking to replace Obama has already confirmed she will follow the same path as Obama and his "useful idiots"

PS: See also the Cloward/Piven Strategy used by Obamination.  Note: George Romney was an Alinskyite.  The book delves deep into tactics, and they ain’t nice.
– Dajjal –

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Canada's Seditious Public Broadcaster

This sort of thing speaks for its SELF - the CBC, Canada's TAXPAID state (socialist) broadcaster, often commits open sedition against the government (basically, we the Canadian people) who own it.

From HERE:

===========


Dear friend,

I am staring at the blueprint for the CBC Stephen Harper will surely implement if his Conservatives win the October 19th election – and it is devastating...

With the election just 91 days away, FRIENDS has a dramatic plan to stand up to Harper and his henchmen. But we need your help to make it happen.
Please join me in giving generously to put our new ad on the air.
Just a few hours ago in Ottawa, a Senate Committee that has been “studying” the challenges faced by the CBC for the past 20 months released its report. The seven Conservative Senators, who are a majority on the Committee, were all appointed by Stephen Harper.
As loyal servants, they have done Harper’s bidding, proposing his hostile agenda that would move our CBC towards oblivion.
Harper’s Senators are proposing to rob CBC by handing part of its budget to private TV producers.  They also want to transform CBC into a user-pay ‘PBS North’ – begging viewers for donations.
Eviscerating CBC Television would lead to a two-tier service – where the 80% of Canadians whose first language is English would receive services from CBC inferior to those enjoyed by the 20% of francophone Canadians, although all of us are taxpayers.
The result would be remarkably similar to ideas Harper himself floated back in 2004 when he said:
“I’ve suggested that government subsidies in support of CBC’s services should be to those things that are not... do not have commercial alternatives.”
He then added:
“When you take a look at things like main-English language television and probably to a lesser degree Radio Two, you could look there at putting those on a commercial basis.”

That’s right. Harper wants to privatize CBC Television and these two Senate proposals would lead to that.

With your help, FRIENDS will put this ad on the air as a forceful response to Harper’s destructive agenda.

Our ad is a powerful statement of what we want from our CBC, what our national public broadcaster means to us as a fundamental part of our democracy, and a force that connects our diverse population coast to coast to coast.
Not everyone on this Committee agrees with Harper’s Senators.  In fact, one member – Senator Art Eggleton – has published his own minority opinion that is an eloquent defence of our national public broadcaster, and a true reflection of the evidence placed before the Committee during its 20-month study.  You can read it here.

This is the moment for supporters of public broadcasting to stand up for our CBC!

We must not fail!  Let’s take back our CBC!  It belongs to all of us and is not for Harper – or any other politician – to destroy!
Please respond as generously as you can.
Best regards!
Ian Morrison
Ian Morrison
Spokesperson
FRIENDS of Canadian Broadcasting
PS: If you would prefer to donate by regular mail, please send your donation to:
FRIENDS of Canadian Broadcasting
200/238 – 131 Bloor Street West
Toronto, ON
M5S 1R8
PPS: Here is FRIENDS’ news release on today’s Senate report.
PPPS: Here is a Canadian Press story about the report.
FRIENDS logo
view email in browser   | update contact info  |  unsubscribe
FRIENDS of Canadian Broadcasting is an independent watchdog for Canadian programming
and is not affiliated with any broadcaster or political party.


200/238-131 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON, M5S 1R8, 866-833-1282

View FRIENDS' privacy policy.

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Conspiracy Theory Or TREASON?

Globalist 10 point plan to take down America..... its Treason and they all MUST  be arrested!
They are nothing but Public Servants gone ROGUE!

http://www.thecommonsenseshow....

This is the TRUTH these NWO Whores want to keep from you....... Documented History!
http://djosiris.blogspot.com/2...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Obama admits he was born in Kenya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://commieblaster.com/

Supreme Court..... Obama Fraud!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College ... Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama,
under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate.

The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama’s legitimacy and qualification to serve as President

The article titled, “Obama Eligibility Questioned,” leads some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama’s first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama’s legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama’s dual c itizenship disqualified him from serving as president.. Donofrio’s case is just one of 18 suits brought by
citizens demanding proof of Obama’s citizenship or qualification to serve as president.

- See more at:

https://themuslimissue.wordpre...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

http://breakingobama.blogspot....

Kennedy, The Fed And Executive Order

1111http://rense.com/general44...

Nap: Hillary Clinton Approved Arms for Terrorist Enemies of U.S. - See more at
https://specialoperationsspeak...

BREAKING NEWS! Bombshell: Newly Documents Reveal Obama and Hillary Concocted Benghazi Video Lie with Jihadist Help
http://www.teaparty.org/bombsh...

Obama admits he was born in Kenya

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

DNA Proves Obama is a Foreign Citizen and No Relation To Stanley Ann Dunham

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

BREAKING: EVIDENCE EMERGES FBI PROTECTING USURPER OBAMA SOETORO SOEBARKAH

http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.c......

THE U.S. MILITARY DOES HAVE LEGAL JURISDICTION TO ARREST OBAMA!

http://www.americasfreedomfigh...

Citizenship laws as expressed in Title 8 of the United States Code states the use of a Foreign Passport
constitutes adult recognition of relinquishment of American Citizenship:

8 USC 1481
(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality-
(1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application or upon an application filed
by a duly authorized agent, after having attained the age of eighteen years;
Using a foreign passport in order to obtain status as a foreign student is precisely that, proof of naturalization in a foreign state.

The child Barack Obama became an Indonesian Citizen when he was adopted by his stepfather Lolo Soetoro and the family’s subsequent relocation to Indonesia. Young Barack by law needed Indonesian Citizenship in order to attend school, and his adoption provided this. Indeed, in young Barack’s situation adoption was necessary to gain it.

Obama’s college transcripts from Occidental College indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school.

The transcript from Occidental College shows that Obama (Barry Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship (scholarship) for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program – an international educational exchange program sponsored by the U.S. government.

Grants are available for U.S. citizens to go abroad and for non-U.S. citizens with no U.S. permanent residence to come to the U.S. To qualify, for the non-US citizen scholarship to study in the U.S., a
student applicant must claim and provide proof of foreign citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking. The United States Constitution requires that Presidents (and Vice Presidents) of the United States be natural born citizens of the United States.

Barack Hussein Obama Is A Traitor.

http://www.fromthetrenchesworl...

Obama administration agenda to “kill U.S Dollar” - See more at:
http://www.thedailysheeple.com......

Terrifying Anonymous Message - Red Code - June 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

JADE HELM 15 Red List, Blue List, Yellow List
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The USA Has Been Sold ! The Lima Declaration NWO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://benjaminfulford.net/201...

Military Preparing For WAR Jade Helm Is NOT for U S Citizens (White Wash propaganda)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

California Water Shortage is a lie!

Stealing Water For Profit & Power By Creating Shortage - Deborah Tavare
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Millions to DIE - "Primary Water" Restricted - Deborah Tavares
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

President Kennedy, The Fed And Executive Order 11110


http://rense.com/general44/exe...

Glenn Beck : Agenda 21 is not a fiction, it's implemented right now in US and all over the World !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The Depopulation Agenda For a New World Order Agenda 21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Sustainable Destruction - Exposing Agenda 21 in Rural America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Agenda 21's Globalist Death Plan for Humanity Fact, not conspiracy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Agenda 21 The Depopulation Agenda For a New World Order
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

ANONYMOUS - FEMA and Martial Law - Guaranteed to BLOW Your Mind!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Operation Jade Helm exposed - starting on July 15, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

THE REAL REASON WALMART IS CLOSING STORES SUDDENLY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Tunnels Under Walmart Confirmed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...


Saturday, July 4, 2015

FGM: Culturally Sensitive Canadian Doctors Perform It "Legally"

Ottawa Citizen, Saturday, July 4, 2015, P.#C4. From HERE and HERE:

Culture enters the medical discussion

Health-care providers wonder how far they should go to accommodate sometimes unorthodox needs of Canada's increasingly diverse community, writes Tom blackwell.

Well, first off, criminal libtards, medical NEEDS don't change due to "cultures," and if Canada is becoming "increasingly diverse" then it's NOT a single "community" any more, is it? Also, "medicine" is not a subjective "discussion" (opinion) or a "narrative" (story) no matter how many times you want to change the wording of your lies to trick your gullible vicitms into believing it is.


As the adolescent girl underwent gynecological surgery at a western Canadian hospital, a doctor stood by to perform an unusual function.

The physician was there, according to a source familiar with the incident, to sign a certificate verifying she remained a virgin - and was still marriageable in her immigrant community. 

Gee, I wonder which "immigrant community" needs it's girls' clitorises chopped out and virginity tested? I also (don't really) wonder why you child-mutilating racist liberal pigs won't name it here!

It was a stark example of an increasing preoccupation for Canada's health-care system:

accommodating the sometimes unorthodox needs of ethnic and religious minorities in an evermore multicultural society.

Here's one for you criminal liars: human medical needs don't change because of upbringing or origin.

Hospitals grapple with requests for doctors of a specific sex or race; sometimes they disconnect fire alarms to allow sweetgrass burning, prolong life support for religious reasons and host clinics to treat fasting diabetics at Ramadan.

The gestures stem not only from the country's growing diversity, but a generally more patient-focused system - and a recognition that treating solely physical ailments is not always enough.

The "gestures" are only evidence of your cowardly masochistic Submission to primitive superstitions.

"If we don't engage in the (cultural) discussion, we won't fully understand their health needs and they won't get met," says Marie Serdynska, who heads a pioneering project in the field, the Montreal Children's Hospital's socio-cultural consultation and interpretation services.

"So, ultimately, they will get sicker and be a greater cost to the health-care system."

NO. Muslims are already physically sicker than everyone else, due to over a thousand of years of inbreeding. And they are all psychotic mental basket-cases due to imitating a "divine" psychopath.

But with the topic being featured at national pediatric and bioethics conferences recently, medical professionals are debating a difficult question: is there is a point at which catering to cultural preferences crosses a moral - or even legal - line?

Because to responsibility-averse liberal criminals, morality and legality are always separate "issues."

While a physician in the neonatal intensive care unit at Toronto's Sick Kids hospital, Dr. Jonathan Hellmann was sometimes asked by fathers from "patriarchal" cultures not to discuss a child's condition with the mother unless the husband was also present.

Agreeing to such a request not only raises ethical and practical questions, but might even violate Ontario's Health-Care Consent Act - unless the mother explicitly agreed to the arrangement.

Sure, and a hostage's claims at gunpoint that they prefer to remain with their captors is also valid.

"It's challenging to the caregivers in that situation, when the mother is at the bedside and the father is able to visit only in the evenings," says Hellmann. "Both equally have decisionmaking power, both should have information."

Even hospitals that try to be sensitive to specific cultural groups, like Ontario's Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, with its aboriginal patient "navigator," can face vexing dilemmas. When two First Nations girls with leukemia decided to withdraw from chemotherapy at the facility and try native remedies, an emotional courtroom battle followed.

And it recently emerged that a Vancouver-area intensive-care unit was asked to keep a brain-dead patient on life support for days until he could be flown to his country of origin, the family's culture rejecting the concept of neurological death.

Still, for every demanding request, there are dozens of positive incidents - even if they involve once-unheardof accommodation, say ethicists, doctors and patient advocates.

Some Halifax hospitals have convinced the fire marshal to allow smudging, aboriginal purification rituals in which sweetgrass is burned. Sometimes, this means adjusting the smoke detector in a patient's room temporarily so it doesn't set off an alarm, says Christy Simpson, a bioethicist at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

I'm pretty sure deliberately turning off smoke-detectors violates all sorts of laws and insurance policy.

Randi Zlotnik Shaul, director of bioethics at Sick Kids, said she's aware of a request for a drumming circle in a neonatal intensive care unit, a normally very quiet environment. Steps were taken to comply with some parts of the proposal - and not interfere with other tiny patients - but a line was drawn at the proposal for a small, open fire, she said.

Yet fulfilling such appeals, often made for dying patients, can be a question simply of innovation and sensitivity, like when someone asks that a patient's bed face Mecca, she says.

"Some might respond very categorically, 'Nope, in this place all beds face the same way,' " she says. "Someone oriented another way might say, 'Yeah, they are all faced that way, but maybe if we got an extension cord, there is actually something we can do.' "

Be helpful and courteous to superstition-based murderous crime-gangs; only inconvenience the sick.

Serdynska says she knows of hospitals providing "mementos" of births to new mothers whose cultures traditionally require them to bury their placenta.

Screw their primitive "cultures" - this insanity only encourages them to never adapt to reality.

Dr. Tara Kiran, a Toronto family physician, was taken aback when she first encountered patients from Bangladesh and Pakistan at an inner-city clinic who insisted on fasting between sunrise and sunset during Ramadan, despite health issues like diabetes that normally require strict regulation of diet and medication.

Her patients, however, happily embraced what they saw as the experience's spiritual, invigorating benefits. "It was an interesting challenge to my assumptions," says Kiran. "My gut reaction was that fasting has negative impacts on health."

There is absolutely nothing spiritual in islam. Nothing. Fasting teaches them to starve while at war.

In London, Ont., St. Joseph's Health Centre runs a special clinic during Ramadan to help the city's estimated 3,000 diabetic Muslims.

London Ontario is a fucking small town! How is it possible it already hosts 3,000 "diabetic" muslims, on top of however many non-diabetic ones are there?! Why is Harper hosting Ramadan at his home?!

Muslim needs, including heightened privacy for female hospital patients instead of the usual, unannounced arrival of staff at the bedside, were once given short shrift, says Khadija Haffajee, spokeswoman for the National Council of Canadian Muslims.

As usual, THEY LIE. By sharia law itself, muslimas are NOT required to have female-only doctors!

But the system has generally made great strides, says Haffajee, who has addressed
classes of nursing students on her faith's practices.

"It's about reasonable accommodation and understanding," she says. "When people are ill, you're dealing with very vulnerable people, so empathy goes a long way."

What empathy do any holy mobster muslims ever demonstrate to their victims across the world?!

Accommodation can sometimes simply be a case of bridging the cultural divide, says Montreal's Serdynska.

Medical teams at her hospital once saw Vietnamese patients with unexplained bruising and immediately suspected child abuse. Further inquiry revealed the marks were the result of "capping," or "coining," a traditional southeast Asian treatment that involves scraping a smooth edge across the body in the belief it releases unhealthy elements.

Her service now has cultural interpreters who will talk to immigrant parents when, for instance, drug treatment is not working. Sometimes, it relates to the side-effects and contraindications spelled out on unfamiliar packaging, she says. "For some cultures who do not generally take pharmaceutical medication this is very frightening."

Time for the primitives to be educated about the objective truth which they've ignored for centuries.

The institutional, impersonal nature of a hospital alone makes it a daunting place for aboriginal people, especially if they attended residential schools, says Margo Greenwood, academic leader at the National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health in Prince George, B.C. Hanging indigenous art, providing culturally appropriate prayer space and consulting local native communities all help alleviate that anxiety, as does being open to other forms of treatment.

Why do our taxes pay for others' superstitions? Where are the Christian chapels in our hospitals? 

"You're dealing with two different systems of knowledge: one is what I learned when I went to university and one is what I learned in my community," she says. "People (are) saying ... 'I want the two to work together.' "

But what are health-care providers to do when the request stemming from an ethnic or religious practice appears to breach their own ethical boundaries?

Your subjective ethical boundaries!? Catering to superstition instantly breaches objective morality.

Reports in 2013 of doctors in Quebec issuing virginity certificates earned a swift response from the province's medical regulatory body. Physicians must refuse to comply, insisted the College des Medecins, and explain such a service has nothing to do with health care.

Yeah, but that was only in Quebec, and before the white Quebecois got guilted into a recent election.

Less black-and-white, perhaps, is the patient asking for a doctor of a particular sex or, less commonly, of a specific race. On the surface, at least, the idea is a repudiation of fundamental human-rights principles, yet for some patients it could be a religious imperative or a fallout from past abuse.

This is not a religious imperative under islamic sharia!!! Female patients are treated by male doctors!

As for "past abuse" every non-muslim "culture" in the world has already been genocided by muslims!

Some hospitals say they will try as much as possible to provide a female doctor for Muslim women, for instance, when asked.

As I said before: THEY LIE. There is no such 'requirement' under sharia "law" (which repudiates it)!

In Montreal, about half the obstetrician-gynecologists are women, so supplying a female one is usually quite feasible, said Togas Tulandi, interim head of the McGill University medical school's obstetrics and gynecology department.

More troublesome, say ethicists and physicians, are patients who insist they not be treated by a doctor or nurse of a certain race - typically Caucasians rejecting non-white workers in today's multi-hued medical workforce - or want one of their own colour.

Ethicists at Toronto's University Health Network (UHN) published a nine page paper on how to tackle "discriminatory" requests of this sort, suggesting the affected health-care worker should often have the final say.

Sure, when sane white people refuse to be 'treated' by primitive muslim criminals, it's "unfair ugly hate," but when blacks want Arab doctors because you liberals told them whites (but "not Arabs") had enslaved their ancestors, you go along because it helps you confirm your false racist "narratives."

"It's ugly, it's unfair," says Linda Wright, a bioethicist at UHN, of the potential impact on medical staff. "To ... have someone say you're not good enough because of the colour of your skin is offensive."

But only if you're white, right? Because that's not "racist" of you at all, is it? Oh, wait...! Also, all such "bio-ethicists" should be brought up on charges of Dr.Mengele-like crimes against humanity.

How often Canadian hospitals have to deal with the dilemma is unclear.

A 2010 U.S. study of emergency doctors, though, concluded the scenario is common, with hospitals frequently accommodating requests for racespecific practitioners.

But primarily from whites, or blacks, you refuse to say - which avoidance pretty-much answers it.