Friday, June 28, 2019

Canadian Guilty Racist White Liberals Sign Away Native Lands to Non-Racist Whites

From here:

Ottawa signs first self-government deals with Metis

RIGHTS RECOGNIZED

_________

Groups to decide who can claim citizenship

_________

Maura Forrest, national Post, Friday, June 28, 2019 P.#NP3.

'Metis' (mateys) is the term used to refer to mixed half-breed natives/whites whose blood is so
diluted they are only 1/32 or less native, so diluted that they have never qualified for Injun Status
on Reserves. Feeling butthurt that they look white and have white names, but hankering after that
tax-free victimhood status enjoyed by their very distant relatives, they unionized and lobbied gullible

court judges to grant them rights they were never before entitled to and cannot possibly have earned.

OTTAWA — The federal government has signed self-government agreements with three provincial branches of the Métis Nation in Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan on Thursday, the first time Ottawa has forged such arrangements with Métis groups.

For decades, Métis organizations have fought to achieve the same recognition of rights as First Nations.

These self-government agreements follow several recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions that have formally recognized Métis Aboriginal rights and the federal government’s responsibility for issues affecting the Métis.

The agreements, signed at a ceremony in Ottawa Thursday by Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett and the Métis Nation of Ontario, the Métis Nation of Alberta and the Métis Nation-Saskatchewan, do not set out specific terms for governance of areas like education or health care, nor do they resolve existing land claims. Instead, they are intended as an upfront recognition of the Métis right to self-government, with further agreements on specific areas of jurisdiction to follow.

So the lilberals just completely surrendered our entire country in advance,
agreeing to work out those pesky details of their abject surrender later.

“For generations, Métis weren’t recognized at all by the federal government. This is a sad truth that our government is committed to address,” Bennett said. “Métis were the forgotten people. You have fought to come out of the shadows. And today, we take another important step.”

While Bennett said her government recognizes the inherent rights of Métis communities in central and Western Canada, she had strong words for the growing number of so-called Métis groups that have cropped up in Quebec and Atlantic Canada claiming Aboriginal rights to hunt and fish, suggesting they do not qualify as Métis. Among other things, the new agreements recognize Métis governments’ jurisdiction over the sometimes fraught question of who gets to claim Métis citizenship.

While previous self-government agreements with First Nations have taken many years to negotiate, these were set out in the three years since a landmark 2016 Supreme Court ruling. They align with the Liberal government’s effort to acknowledge Aboriginal rights from the outset, rather than at the culmination of decades of negotiation.

“This is a dramatic shift in attitude for Canada,” said Métis Nation of Alberta President Audrey Poitras. “Reconciliation requires transformative change, and the agreement signed today gives me faith that transformative change is really on its way.”

The Métis governments will now have to develop their own constitutions, to be funded by the federal government, and will need to negotiate new fiscal arrangements with Ottawa. They may also negotiate agreements for jurisdiction of areas including child care, language and administration of justice.

Hey! Want your own justice system? Just declare yourself a distant half-breed Asian hillbilly! Whee!

And: How is that "self-government" in any way shape or form?!

Everything is still too be "funded by the federal government"
(aka whitey's tax dollars, since Injuns don't pay any taxes)!

The agreements further set out an expectation that the federal minister will recommend legislation to Parliament to affirm the legal status of the Métis governments, though this almost certainly will not happen before the fall federal election.

THIS SORT OF TREASONOUS INSANITY MUST NEVER BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN!

“Canada has made a great move, and today we’ll look to push that agenda to the prime minister, to be able to have our people in Canada understand and realize that we’re a part of Canada,” said Métis Nation-Saskatchewan President Greg McCallum.

Though the term Métis has been claimed by a number of communities of mixed Indigenous and European ancestry across Canada, the Métis Nation represents communities in Western Canada that emerged along fur trading routes and have historic ties to places like the Red River Settlement, where Louis Riel emerged as the most famous Métis leader. It has five provincial affiliates in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia.

Because they have not been recognized as governments, however, and because the Indian Act does not apply to the Métis, the organizations have had to form non-profit corporations (i.e: victims' propaganda unions) to be acknowledged as legal entities that can negotiate with different levels of government.

“Fundamentally, this is about recognition. It’s about recognition and respect for our governments as governments,” said Métis Nation of Ontario President Margaret Froh.

This was just another tiny whiny victim-group given unearned rights by activist "judges:"

In 2003, the Supreme Court of Canada first defined Métis rights and established criteria, known as the Powley test, to determine who can qualify for those rights. A subsequent Supreme Court decision in 2016 clarified the federal government’s legal obligations to the Métis, and paved the way for these latest negotiations.

Since the 2003 Powley decision, however, there has been a dramatic spike in the number of Canadians claiming to be Métis, especially in Quebec and Atlantic Canada. Census data shows that the number of people who call themselves Métis rose by nearly 150 per cent in Quebec between 2006 and 2016. Critics allege that many of these people are interested only in acquiring Aboriginal hunting and fishing rights.

Qel surprise!

There was little sympathy for so-called Eastern Métis groups during Thursday’s ceremony. “I think there are significant concerns of people handing out Métis cards to people who are not Métis,” Bennett said, to cheers and applause. “And I think that some of the research is showing that people misunderstand what capital-M Métis are. This is not just being able to show that you had a great-great-grandmother somewhere who was Indigenous. This is why… nations will determine who their members are.”

The self-government agreements do not resolve outstanding issues over land rights. In 1870, the passage of the Manitoba Act promised a land grant to the Métis that was never delivered. Instead, the federal government devised a system of scrip that issued documents to Métis households redeemable for land or money in exchange for their land rights, which the Supreme Court has referred to as “a sorry chapter in our nation’s history.” In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in a case brought by the Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) that the Crown had failed to follow through on its promise. The MMF is negotiating a separate agreement with the federal government.

But Froh said the new agreements set the stage for the three Métis governments to resolve their own land claims. “These agreements provide a process for us to actually start to move those forward, so that we’re able to address fundamentally the promises that were made.”

What fucking land rights?! Rights to whose lands, where?! Do they now get chunks of the Reserves?!

The metis were never a homogeneous "nation" - they're only a group of disparate cast-offs from the various different tribes across Canada! None of the other Indigenous Nations were ever united in any way,
much less from coast to coast! They were always at war with each other!

This is just a bunch of completely guilty white racist liberals signing away our entire country to a bunch of
non-guilty "non-racist" (provably so, because some distant ancestors had sex with natives) whites!

Thursday, June 27, 2019

MUELLER INDICTED!

From here:

Mueller Indicted!

Charged with Witness Tampering, Obstruction of Justice, Attempting to Suborn Perjury and Treason

(June 27, 2019). Today, Larry Klayman, a former federal prosecutor and the founder of Freedom Watch (www.freedomwatchusa.org) announced the criminal indictment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller by a citizens grand jury for the alleged crimes of witness tampering, obstruction of justice, attempting to suborn perjury and other illegalities. A copy of the indictment, jury instructions, verdict form and related documents are embedded below and can also be found on Freedom Watch's website along with a video of the grand jury proceedings. Filming the proceedings as well as offering testimony about Mueller's illegal grand jury leaks was Jason Goodman, CEO of Crowdsource the truth. The video of the proceedings can also be found at the links below:

Freedom Watch YouTube Channel

https://www.youtube.com/freedomwatch

Crowdsource the Truth Channel

https://www.youtube.com/c/JasonGoodmancrowdsourcethetruth

In a landmark case styled United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia ruled that the grand jury does not belong to any of the three branches of government, but rather to the American people. Indeed, several states have citizens grand juries.

Klayman had this to say as the prosecutor who procured this indictment:

"On June 12, 2019, a citizens grand jury comprised of eight jurors heard testimony and considered other evidence principally from Dr. Jerome Corsi, who had been a target of Special Counsel Mueller's so-called Russian collusion investigation and voted out a true bill of indictment based on Mueller's primarily having threatened Corsi with indictment if he did not agree to lie under oath implicating President Donald Trump in criminal activity. In addition, the citizens grand jury indictment addresses alleged illegal and unconstitutional surveillance and criminal grand jury leaks concerning Corsi."

"This criminal indictment of Mueller is both historic and the first of its kind, particularly since it is clear that the Department of Justice, in the end, protects its own. See Solomon, "Feds Gone Wild: DOJ's Stunning Inability to Prosecute its Own Bad Actors," The Hill (June 13, 2019).

"While other watchdog groups, such as the group which I founded Judicial Watch and left in 2003 to run for the U.S. Senate in Florida, mainly just get documents through the Freedom of Information Act ('FOIA') and then looks to a compromised government to take action, Freedom Watch's Justice League seeks to itself mete out justice on behalf of We the People."

"Now that Mueller had been indicted, he will be tried, a conviction will be sought before a people's court, and if convicted a suitable sentence meted out. There is no other alternative to restore the rule of law to the nation, as our system of justice has been compromised and corrupted by the establishments of both political parties, who circle the wagons and in the end protect themselves at the expense of the American people."

For more information, contact daj142182@gmail.com or (424) 274 2579.

Click to View PDF

Click to View PDF

View Documents

https://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/190625-Jury Instructions Probable Cause_.pdf

https://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/190625-Verdict Form .pdf

https://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/190625-Indictment .pdf

Wednesday, June 26, 2019

Crime Control? Try Cop Control First!

From here:

Reports Show US Police Having Trouble Hiring More Cops — A Sign We Need a Major Change

The majority of police departments across the country are experiencing a decline in people applying to be cops. This is an opportunity for peaceful change.

Matt Agorist

June 26, 2019

New reports from across the country show that police departments are unable to keep their numbers up as fewer people are applying to be cops. There is a police recruitment crisis in America but this should not surprise anyone and can serve as a major opportunity, if we seize it.

According to Bethesda Magazine, numbers in Montgomery county, Maryland show police recruitment has dropped by nearly half in just the last few years. Instead of looking both inward and outward, officials are simply blaming it on increased police scrutiny.

“When you do a job that’s being highly criticized on a daily basis, we have to ask ourselves, how do we find good candidates that really want to be under that type of scrutiny,” said Acting Police Chief Marcus Jones. “If you feel like you’re being scrutinized all the time, then this may not be the career that you want, so we understand that that may be a roadblock for us.”

But police, and all government for that matter, must be scrutinized, as they hold power over people and unchecked power turns into tyranny—every single time.

It’s not just Maryland either. According to a report from the US Department of Justice, throughout the United States, “the number of full-time sworn officers per 1,000 residents decreased, from 2.42 in 1997 to 2.17 in 2016 (down 11%). The 2016 rate of full-time sworn officers per 1,000 residents was also lower than the rates in 2000 (down 7%), 2003 (down 8%), and 2007 (down 7%).”

And, as Reason magazine recently pointed out, nationally, 66 percent of police departments report seeing declining numbers of applications, according to a survey of 400 law enforcement agencies by the the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF).

This number is down despite many police officer salaries skyrocketing. The average cop makes $64,000 annually with some cops raking in over a quarter of a million each year.

While some Americans may see this decline as a negative situation, it is important to examine the possible reasons for it and understand that this isn’t necessarily a bad thing and can be a really good thing.

“The American policing profession may be facing the most fundamental questioning of its legitimacy in decades,” said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, in a 2017 organizational newsletter. “The very essence of policing is being debated in many cities, often because of controversial video recordings of police officers’ actions. Community trust has eroded, and the professionalism of the police is being questioned.”

This questioning is necessary. This scrutiny is deserved. And, this decline in police officers is a sign that things need to change.

There is no doubt that being a police officer can be a grueling, dangerous, and often times extremely unrewarding job. But much of this stress is due to a failed job description.

While many cops out there have saved lives and have been recognized for their heroism, others, who are ‘just doing their jobs’ have continued to drive a wedge between the police and the policed.

Enforcing laws for victimless crimes, extorting people over arbitrary traffic laws like seat belts and window tint, and kidnapping and caging people for marijuana does not make you a hero. It makes you a tool for the prison industrial complex and the police state.

When taking a quick scroll down Facebook posts, websites, and Twitter feeds on any number of subjects, it is easy to find negative comments about police officers. Despite police unions and police apologists claiming these negative comments and criticisms are coming from criminals and thugs, the reality is much different.

Of course murderers, rapists, and thieves hate cops but these are not the people openly criticizing police. This criticism comes from mothers and fathers who’ve watched their children get harassed constantly because of the neighborhoods they live in or the color of their skin.

This criticism comes from the millions of people who have a family member whose life has been ruined because police caught them with a plant. This criticism comes from the millions of other people who have to decide between paying their electricity bill or paying their $300 seat belt ticket.

Many police departments even take to social media to brag about enforcing these laws in which there is no victim. Why, exactly, these departments brag on Facebook about such a waste of taxpayer money and oppression of the poor is a mystery—but they do it a lot.

And we the people are becoming tired of it.

Rape kits collect dust on shelves in police departments nationwide while weed busts continue to soar despite growing legality. Billions are collected in traffic fines annually while murders remain uninvestigated. Priorities are in disarray.

As TFTP has reported, when cops stop going after people for possessing substances deemed illegal by the state, real crimes are actually solved.

In fact, a study out of Boston showed exactly that. The study indicated that the Boston Police Department has drastically increased the number of homicides they solved since they stopped making arrests for marijuana. The homicide clearance rate increase by 10% following the decriminalization of marijuana in the area.

“The BPD homicide unit increased the yearly Boston homicide clearance rate by nearly 10 percent […] and by more than 18 percent when the clearance rate definition was extended to include those cases awaiting grand jury decisions,” the study said.

Civil asset forfeiture pays. Busting low-level drug dealers by the dozen and confiscating their drugs, guns, cars, houses, and money pays. Writing tickets for victimless crime pays. Pulling you over for window tint, seat belts, arbitrary traveling speeds, and expired license plates; these are the things that pay — solving murders does not pay.

However, as the drug war toned down slightly with the decriminalization of marijuana, police are miraculously able to funnel more resources and dedicate more officers towards solving murders. This is common sense.

In the United States, the murder clearance rate in 1965 was more than 90 percent. Since the inception of the war on drugs, the murder clearance rate has plummeted to an average of less than 65 percent per year.

This decline is in spite of there being far fewer murders. It is also in spite of new technological developments to help police solve crimes, like DNA testing, advanced forensic labs, and unethical spying devices like the stingray.

Despite the near complete erosion of the constitutional protections against unlawful search and seizure, the clearance rate for murder continued its free fall. This highlights the fact that no matter how many rights are given up or freedoms diminished — police cannot guarantee your safety — and all of this is due to the war on drugs and revenue collection for victimless crimes.

This decline in police recruitment should come as no surprise as law enforcement in this country has been at a cross roads for some time. While some heroic officers are taking a stand and calling for an end to the war on drugs and revenue collection, others are hell bent on maintaining the revenue stream, job security, and budgets for militarization that this war brings them.

Equally as egregious is the fact that the enforcement of victimless crimes endangers the lives of cops too and their own superiors don’t seem to care.

The overwhelming majority of violent police interactions stem from the enforcement of the war on drugs. This is a huge problem and countless experts in the field already have the solution. End the drug war. Sadly, however, except for a few departments across the country, most police will not even consider the notion.

The fact is that the drug war is dangerous, not only for the people being accused of having drugs by police, but as multiple deadly drug war incidents illustrate, it’s incredibly dangerous for police officers too.

Despite police officers being killed at a historically low rate, enforcing a war on substances pushes the sale of these substances into the criminal realm which makes it dangerous for everyone.

We can look at the prohibition of alcohol and the subsequent mafia crime wave that ensued as a result as an example. The year 1930, at the peak of prohibition, happened to be the deadliest year for police in American history. 300 police officers were killed enforcing a war on booze, and innumerable poor people slaughtered as the state cracked down on drinkers.

When the people became tired of the suffering and death created by the war on booze, they decided to end it, not double down. This is what needs to happen now.

The decline in people wanting to become cops is a sign that things need to change. This sign can be taken as an opportunity for Americans to move forward and foster a more free society, or it can be squandered and covered in excuses by playing victim. The choice is ours.

Culturally Marxist Western Governments Divide and Conquer Us with Equality Insurance Schemes

From Bob Livingston Alerts, Wednesday 26 June, 2019: (But first, my take on government basics101)

Government, (best conceived of by Albert Einstein as the largest collectively-owned insurance company) is a great idea if and when it doesn't compete with (much less pre-empt) private enterprise; it's OK for the government to buy food to feed the poor, but not to demand that only it is qualified to regulate food growing everywhere, much less to restrict and deny private individuals from growing or stockpiling their own food. Same goes for defending every other need: government can defend the country, but not restrict the citizens' rights to also own and bear their own arms to defend them selves; government can and should enhance private defense, but never replace it!

And it's based on individual property rights and people's free-will choice to associate with others:

People have rights to freely associate and form insurance companies, and to restrict others within their own properties to, say, buy insurance while therein.

Our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack others first.

Beyond that, we need government to counter-attack second, because we also have a right not to do so our selves, otherwise we would be enslaved to the criminals' whims and schedules.

As a collective whole, however, we do have a responsibility to counter-attack second (to hold trials and sentence punishments) if only because the chance of being caught is more of a deterrent than fear of the amount of stated prescribed punishment.

So as usual we have an individual right, but really only a collective responsibility, to defensively counter-attack.

Government, in giving away our money to "foreign aid" is failing in its main duty to be our insurance company. However, such controversial schemes are usually billed as "War-Prevention Insurance" to help our allies in order to help them to ultimately contribute to defending us too. So it's a toss-up.

And ditto by being able to borrow money from banks. Just as when the real, lesser insurance companies were illegally permitted to be owned by banks, by the bank-bribed politicians (that's a massive interest conflict, because insurance companies try to keep rates down by reducing risks and refusing to insure risky people, while banks actually profit most from issuing reconstruction loans for destruction-caused disasters and crimes)!

But as an insurance company, govt IS enforced victimology: taking from the able to give to the (hopefully only temporarily) disabled victims.

After a while, though, and based on the fallacy of modern education, which seeks to discover why, not how, people do the things they do, it's ever-expanding list of who constitutes a victim class now includes "everybody!" and even those who are physically able, yet unwilling to work, are classified as being "depressed" and suffering from "mental illness" (as being helpless victims of their own mysterious yet somehow also inevitably-forced emotions)!

This is how individualism becomes collectivism - as if deferring one's free-will rights and responsibilities to self-determination over to a group or gang of equally fallible humans pretending to be superior "authorities" has ever, will ever, or can ever really work out in the real world! How is a gang of victims less so than only one?! They're not - the gang simply increases their extortion powers while simultaneously diluting their personal responsibility! "Victim-based" reparations extortion is still slavery.

Government is not supposed to exist to "redistribute wealth" (steal) from Makers to give to Takers.

It is not supposed to exist to enforce an equality of outcome over an equality of opportunity, nor even to redress past inequalities of opportunity caused by individuals or groups by extorting reparations today.

Even those blacks who were sold by their own brethren to the American whites, have been more than justly compensated because what they lost was being a slave in Africa, and now their descendants are US citizens.

So in reality, ALL governments, both secular and religious, are exercises in slander - in making laws and issuing warnings which pre-judge their citizens as guilty until never proven innocent, and they also all emphasize how nobody has any rights to self-defense, but only the responsibility to defer all of their rights to government; in effect, you only have the rightful responsibility to become and remain their slaves. This never changes. New laws always take away more rights, they never grant us new ones.

So, on to Bob's take on all this:

Discrimination is liberty

Statist politicians — which means essentially all of them — believe or claim to believe they can legislate equality. As long as there have been governments, politicians have been dividing people into groups in order to pit them against each another as they squabble for government handouts, favors and special privileges all the while claiming they want equality.

Government panders to these groups, granting them a special status as minorities and providing them with extravagant subsidies. Minorities respond because they are conditioned to do so. Subsidies and racism and every form "otherism" are subtle forms of economic warfare between the middle class and minorities. All is a masquerade for the benefit of a wicked political system. This Machiavellian strategy divides the masses and provides cover for the government crime syndicate.

Since at least the 1970s, Washington congressweasels have been promoting the shibboleth that if one group or the other has a perceived disadvantage in outcomes, then government must step in to ensure that everyone attains equal results.

The politicians and government men believe, or claim to believe, that if all of their "groups" don't have equal outcomes then something other than hard work, intelligence and seizing opportunities presented must be culpable. It needs bugbears to blame, and chief among them is "discrimination."

The doctrine of equality and fraternity as a doctrine of liberty, as promoted during the French Revolution and as pushed by the government today, is a myth, a fiction and a self-evident contradiction. It is impossible to have liberty and equality. Yet, the unthinking masses still today accept this as the foundation of American democracy.

On the contrary, the concept of human equality is basic to the destruction of human liberty.

Equality is the organism of racism and "otherism" as promoted by the government. Its purpose is the opposite of human liberty. It is the systematic subversion of human liberty. Further and deeper conclusions are that when we hold two contradictory thoughts such as liberty and equality, the result is double mindedness and unstable thinking (see James 1:8; "... a double-minded man is unstable in all his ways.") leading to greater receptivity to the power of suggestion.

("Double-mindedness" aka "cognitive dissonance" etc is also known as "hypocrisy" and "schizo-phrenia")!

The closer we come to total acceptance of the doctrine of human equality, the closer we come to slavery. In reality, human equality is an impossibility in the real world. As an instrument of government propaganda, it is the perfect organism.

I'd have said it's the perfect "tool" to induce slavery - but whatever; Bob's on a good roll today!

Politicians and government men will tell you that if they can only end discrimination, then everyone would have equality.

Democrats are now advancing a bill called the Equality Act.
As with all government bills, this one does the exact opposite of what it claims.

It would modify existing civil rights legislation to ban discrimination against LGBTQ people in employment, housing, public accommodations, jury service, education, federal programs and credit.

It would also essentially rescind the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and require Christian churches and organizations to accommodate the mental illness and debauchery of the LGBQT crowd in their wickedness and the transgender crowd in their mental illness — a blatant assault on religious liberty.

Whenever a group or class of people is given special "rights" (which aren't really rights, but privileges), the real natural rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are turned on their ears and shoved down the memory hole. In other words, the rights of the one are secondary to the "rights" of the other simply because one subgroup of individuals has been granted special privileges that never before existed.

The freedom to discriminate is essential to liberty. It is not the role of government to determine which discrimination is acceptable and which is not — or to enforce its own form of discrimination to correct another. Though, historically, that is precisely what's occurred.

Psycho-paths ("thought-killers," by definition) hate scary painful thinking - both in them selves, and in all others!

You discriminate every day of your life in everything you do.

You discriminated when you chose your neighborhood and your house. You discriminated when you chose your job. You discriminated when you chose your church — or when you made the decision to not attend church at all.

You discriminate when you choose your friends. You discriminate when you choose your doctor (or did before Obamacare), your barber, your travel agent. You discriminate when you choose your insurance agent, your auto repair shop, your in-home security monitor, your pest-control service.
You discriminate when you choose which movie to watch, which book to read, which electronic device to buy, which show to watch, which sporting team to follow. You discriminate in your choice of beer. You discriminate in your choice of car: American or foreign.

Life in a free country is about being free to make choices, choices based on your own criteria rather than one mandated by the state. Don't like fried chicken? Stay out of KFC. Don't like pizza? Avoid Pizza Hut. Don't care for seafood? Red Lobster isn't the only restaurant in town. Denny's gave you lousy service? Stay away… and tell your friends.

Don't like how Walmart compensates its workers? Buy your cheap Chinese junk from Target or Kmart — or the local mom and pop store — and your groceries from Publix or Kroger.

Don't like it that Chick-fil-A's president supports traditional marriage? Buy your chicken sandwich from Burger King. They've gone all in on "gay pride." Don't like that HGTV's Chip and Joanna Gaines attend a church that defends traditional marriage? Change your channel. There are probably 175 more on your dial.

Don't like Muslims? Stay out of the Middle East, mosques, Louis Farrakhan rallies and U.S. prisons — and Deerbornistan, Michigan.

Sorry Bob, but it's not that simple. Muslims are Qur'an-commanded to invade and conquer everywhere. Since islam is a global crime-and-murder

gang, assisting it by importing its gangsters and covering up its criminal commandments in the media, is to be a willing criminal accessory.

Don't like Jews? Stay out of Israel, New York (especially the diamond district), Massachusetts, California and synagogues.

Don't like kids? Avoid day cares, schools and playgrounds. And don't have unprotected sex.
Don't like blacks? Move to Montana, Vermont or Idaho. There aren't many there.

Don't like whites? Move to Detroit; Jackson, Mississippi; Miami Gardens, Florida; Birmingham, Alabama; Baltimore; or Memphis, Tennessee. You will see some, but they'll be the minority.

That's discrimination. It's also called liberty, freedom of choice and, in the concept of natural law, freedom of association as guaranteed in the 1st Amendment.

And, don't forget, "pattern recognition" - essential to letting our brains function naturally!

Of course, America's no longer free. It just has the trappings and name of a free country.

Yours for the truth,Bob Livingston
Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

Six Inconvenient Truths About The U.S. and Slavery

From here:

By Michael Medved Sep 26, 2007

Those who want to discredit the United States and to deny our role as history’s most powerful and pre-eminent force for freedom, goodness and human dignity invariably focus on America’s bloody past as a slave-holding nation. Along with the displacement and mistreatment of Native Americans, the enslavement of literally millions of Africans counts as one of our two founding crimes—and an obvious rebuttal to any claims that this Republic truly represents “the land of the free and the home of the brave.” According to America-bashers at home and abroad, open-minded students of our history ought to feel more guilt than pride, and strive for “reparations” or other restitution to overcome the nation’s uniquely cruel, racist and rapacious legacy.

Unfortunately, the current mania for exaggerating America’s culpability for the horrors of slavery bears no more connection to reality than the old, discredited tendency to deny that the U.S. bore any blame at all. No, it’s not true that the “peculiar institution” featured kind-hearted, paternalistic masters and happy, dancing field-hands, any more than it’s true that America displayed unparalleled barbarity or enjoyed disproportionate benefit from kidnapping and exploiting innocent Africans.

An honest and balanced understanding of the position of slavery in the American experience requires a serious attempt to place the institution in historical context and to clear-away some of the common myths and distortions.

1. SLAVERY WAS AN ANCIENT AND UNIVERSAL INSTITUTION, NOT A DISTINCTIVELY AMERICAN INNOVATION.

At the time of the founding of the Republic in 1776, slavery existed literally everywhere on earth and had been an accepted aspect of human history from the very beginning of organized societies. Current thinking suggests that human beings took a crucial leap toward civilization about 10,000 years ago with the submission, training and domestication of important animal species (cows, sheep, swine, goats, chickens, horses and so forth) and, at the same time, began the “domestication,” bestialization and ownership of fellow human beings captured as prisoners in primitive wars. In ancient Greece, the great philosopher Aristotle described the ox as “the poor man’s slave” while Xenophon likened the teaching of slaves “to the training of wild animals.” Aristotle further opined that “it is clear that there are certain people who are free and certain who are slaves by nature, and it is both to their advantage, and just, for them to be slaves.” The Romans seized so many captives from Eastern Europe that the terms “Slav” and “slave” bore the same origins. All the great cultures of the ancient world, from Egypt to Babylonia, Athens to Rome, Persia to India to China, depended upon the brutal enslavement of the masses – often representing heavy majorities of the population. Contrary to the glamorization of aboriginal New World cultures, the Mayas, Aztecs and Incas counted among the most brutal slave-masters of them all --- not only turning the members of other tribes into harshly abused beasts of burden but also using these conquered enemies to feed a limitless lust for human sacrifice. The Tupinamba, a powerful tribe on the coast of Brazil south of the Amazon, took huge numbers of captives, then humiliated them for months or years, before engaging in mass slaughter of their victims in ritualized cannibalistic feasts. In Africa, slavery also represented a timeless norm long before any intrusion by Europeans. Moreover, the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch or British slave traders rarely penetrated far beyond the coasts: the actual capture and kidnapping of the millions of victims always occurred at the hands of neighboring tribes. As the great African-American historian Nathan Huggins pointed out, “virtually all of the enslavement of Africans was carried out by other Africans” but the concept of an African “race” was the invention of Western colonists, and most African traders “saw themselves as selling people other than their own.” In the final analysis, Yale historian David Brion Davis in his definitive 2006 history “Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World” notes that “colonial North America…surprisingly received only 5 to 6 percent of the African slaves shipped across the Atlantic.” Meanwhile, the Arab slave trade (primarily from East Africa) lasted longer and enslaved more human beings than the European slavers working the other side of the continent. According to the best estimates, Islamic societies shipped between 12 and 17 million African slaves out of their homes in the course of a thousand years; the best estimate for the number of Africans enslaved by Europeans amounts to 11 million. In other words, when taking the prodigious and unspeakably cruel Islamic enslavements into the equation, at least 97% of all African men, women and children who were kidnapped, sold, and taken from their homes, were sent somewhere other than the British colonies of North America. In this context there is no historical basis to claim that the United States bears primary, or even prominent guilt for the depredations of centuries of African slavery.

2. SLAVERY EXISTED ONLY BRIEFLY, AND IN LIMITED LOCALES, IN THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC – INVOLVING ONLY A TINY PERCENTAGE OF THE ANCESTORS OF TODAY’S AMERICANS.

The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution put a formal end to the institution of slavery 89 years after the birth of the Republic; 142 years have passed since this welcome emancipation. Moreover, the importation of slaves came to an end in 1808 (as provided by the Constitution), a mere 32 years after independence, and slavery had been outlawed in most states decades before the Civil War. Even in the South, more than 80% of the white population never owned slaves. Given the fact that the majority of today’s non-black Americans descend from immigrants who arrived in this country after the War Between the States, only a tiny percentage of today’s white citizens – perhaps as few as 5% -- bear any authentic sort of generational guilt for the exploitation of slave labor. Of course, a hundred years of Jim Crow laws, economic oppression and indefensible discrimination followed the theoretical emancipation of the slaves, but those harsh realities raise different issues from those connected to the long-ago history of bondage.

3. THOUGH BRUTAL, SLAVERY WASN’T GENOCIDAL: LIVE SLAVES WERE VALUABLE BUT DEAD CAPTIVES BROUGHT NO PROFIT.

Historians agree that hundreds of thousands, and probably millions of slaves perished over the course of 300 years during the rigors of the “Middle Passage” across the Atlantic Ocean. Estimates remain inevitably imprecise, but range as high as one third of the slave “cargo” who perished from disease or overcrowding during transport from Africa. Perhaps the most horrifying aspect of these voyages involves the fact that no slave traders wanted to see this level of deadly suffering: they benefited only from delivering (and selling) live slaves, not from tossing corpses into the ocean. By definition, the crime of genocide requires the deliberate slaughter of a specific group of people; slavers invariably preferred oppressing and exploiting live Africans rather than murdering them en masse. Here, the popular, facile comparisons between slavery and the Holocaust quickly break down: the Nazis occasionally benefited from the slave labor of their victims, but the ultimate purpose of facilities like Auschwitz involved mass death, not profit or productivity. For slave owners and slave dealers in the New World, however, death of your human property cost you money, just as the death of your domestic animals would cause financial damage. And as with their horses and cows, slave owners took pride and care in breeding as many new slaves as possible. Rather than eliminating the slave population, profit-oriented masters wanted to produce as many new, young slaves as they could. This hardly represents a compassionate or decent way to treat your fellow human beings, but it does amount to the very opposite of genocide. As David Brion Davis reports, slave holders in North America developed formidable expertise in keeping their “bondsmen” alive and healthy enough to produce abundant offspring. The British colonists took pride in slaves who “developed an almost unique and rapid rate of population growth, freeing the later United States from a need for further African imports.”

4. IT’S NOT TRUE THAT THE U.S. BECAME A WEALTHY NATION THROUGH THE ABUSE OF SLAVE LABOR: THE MOST PROSPEROUS STATES IN THE COUNTRY WERE THOSE THAT FIRST FREED THEIR SLAVES.

Pennsylvania passed an emancipation law in 1780; Connecticut and Rhode Island followed four years later (all before the Constitution). New York approved emancipation in 1799. These states (with dynamic banking centers in Philadelphia and Manhattan) quickly emerged as robust centers of commerce and manufacturing, greatly enriching themselves while the slave-based economies in the South languished by comparison. At the time of the Constitution, Virginia constituted the most populous and wealthiest state in the Union, but by the time of the War Between the States the Old Dominion had fallen far behind a half-dozen northern states that had outlawed slavery two generations earlier. All analyses of Northern victory in the great sectional struggle highlights the vast advantages in terms of wealth and productivity in New England, the Mid-Atlantic States and the Midwest, compared to the relatively backward and impoverished states of the Confederacy. While a few elite families in the Old South undoubtedly based their formidable fortunes on the labor of slaves, the prevailing reality of the planter class involved chronic indebtedness and shaky finances long before the ultimate collapse of the evil system of bondage. The notion that America based its wealth and development on slave labor hardly comports with the obvious reality that for two hundred years since the founding of the Republic, by far the poorest and least developed section of the nation was precisely that region where slavery once prevailed.

5.WHILE AMERICA DESERVES NO UNIQUE BLAME FOR THE EXISTENCE OF SLAVERY, THE UNITED STATES MERITS SPECIAL CREDIT FOR ITS RAPID ABOLITION.

In the course of scarcely more than a century following the emergence of the American Republic, men of conscience, principle and unflagging energy succeeded in abolishing slavery not just in the New World but in all nations of the West. During three eventful generations, one of the most ancient, ubiquitous and unquestioned of all human institutions (considered utterly indispensable by the “enlightened” philosophers of Greece and Rome) became universally discredited and finally illegal – with Brazil at last liberating all its slaves in 1888. This worldwide mass movement (spear-headed in Britain and elsewhere by fervent Evangelical Christians) brought about the most rapid and fundamental transformation in all human history. While the United States (and the British colonies that preceded our independence) played no prominent role in creating the institution of slavery, or even in establishing the long-standing African slave trade pioneered by Arab, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch and other merchants long before the settlement of English North America, Americans did contribute mightily to the spectacularly successful anti-slavery agitation. As early as 1646, the Puritan founders of New England expressed their revulsion at the enslavement of their fellow children of God. When magistrates in Massachusetts discovered that some of their citizens had raided an African village and violently seized two natives to bring them across the Atlantic for sale in the New World, the General Court condemned “this haynos and crying sinn of man-stealing.” The officials promptly ordered the two blacks returned to their native land. Two years later, Rhode Island passed legislation denouncing the practice of enslaving Africans for life and ordered that any slaves “brought within the liberties of this Collonie” be set free after ten years “as the manner is with the English servants.” A hundred and thirty years later John Adams and Benjamin Franklin both spent most of their lives as committed activists in the abolitionist cause, and Thomas Jefferson included a bitter condemnation of slavery in his original draft of the Declaration of Independence. This remarkable passage saw African bondage as “cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty” and described “a market where MEN should be bought and sold” as constituting “piratical warfare” and “execrable commerce.” Unfortunately, the Continental Congress removed this prescient, powerful denunciation in order to win approval from Jefferson’s fellow slave-owners, but the impact of the Declaration and the American Revolution remained a powerful factor in energizing and inspiring the international anti-slavery cause. Nowhere did idealists pay a higher price for liberation than they did in the United States of America. Confederate forces (very few of whom ever owned slaves) may not have fought consciously to defend the Peculiar Institution, but Union soldiers and sailors (particularly at the end of the war) proudly risked their lives for the emancipation cause. Julia Ward Howe’s powerful and popular “Battle Hymn of the Republic” called on Federal troops to follow Christ’s example: “as he died to make men holy/let us die to make men free.” And many of them did die, some 364,000 in four years of combat—or the stunning equivalent of five million deaths as a percentage of today’s United States population. Moreover, the economic cost of liberation remained almost unimaginable. In nearly all other nations, the government paid some form of compensation to slave-owners at the time of emancipation, but Southern slave-owners received no reimbursement of any kind when they lost an estimated $3.5 billion in 1860 dollars (about $70 billion in today’s dollars) of what Davis describes as a “hitherto legally accepted form of property.” The most notable aspect of America’s history with slavery doesn’t involve its tortured and bloody existence, but the unprecedented speed and determination with which abolitionists roused the national conscience and put this age-old evil to an end.

6. THERE IS NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT TODAY’S AFRICAN-AMERICANS WOULD BE BETTER OFF IF THEIR ANCESTORS HAD REMAINED BEHIND IN AFRICA.

The idea of reparations rests on the notion of making up to the descendants of slaves for the incalculable damage done to their family status and welfare by the enslavement of generations of their ancestors. In theory, reparationists want society to repair the wrongs of the past by putting today’s African-Americans into the sort of situation they would have enjoyed if their forebears hadn’t been kidnapped, sold and transported across the ocean. Unfortunately, to bring American blacks in line with their cousins who the slave-traders left behind in Africa would require a drastic reduction in their wealth, living standards, and economic and political opportunities. No honest observer can deny or dismiss this nation’s long record of racism and injustice, but it’s also obvious that Americans of African descent enjoy vastly greater wealth and human rights of every variety than the citizens of any nation of the Mother Continent. If we sought to erase the impact of slavery on specific black families, we would need to obliterate the spectacular economic progress made by those families (and by US citizens in general) over the last 100 years. In view of the last century of history in Nigeria or Ivory Coast or Sierra Leone or Zimbabwe, could any African American say with confidence that he or she would have fared better had some distant ancestor not been enslaved? Of course, those who seek reparations would also cite the devastating impact of Western colonialism in stunting African progress, but the United States played virtually no role in the colonization of the continent. The British, French, Italians, Portuguese, Germans and others all established brutal colonial rule in Africa; tiny Belgium became a particularly oppressive and bloodthirsty colonial power in the Congo. The United States, on the other hand, sponsored only one long-term venture on the African continent: the colony of Liberia, an independent nation set up as a haven for liberated American slaves who wanted to go “home.” The fact that so few availed themselves of the opportunity, or heeded the back-to-African exhortations of turn- of-the-century Black Nationalist Marcus Garvey, reflects the reality that descendants of slaves understood they were better off remaining in the United States, for all its faults.

In short, politically correct assumptions about America’s entanglement with slavery lack any sense of depth, perspective or context. As with so many other persistent lies about this fortunate land, the unthinking indictment of the United States as uniquely blameworthy for an evil institution ignores the fact that the record of previous generations provides some basis for pride as well as guilt.

Communism Can’t Happen In America, Or Can It?

I'd have asked "... In North America, Or Can It?" but then again, the retards near me elected Turdeau.

;-(

From here:

Communism Can’t Happen In America, Or Can It?

By Karen Schoen|June 19th, 2019

Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Islamists have joined to destroy America

Not in America. After all we are America with the strongest military ever. No one will take us over. We have 2 oceans and a Constitution to protect us. We are (or used to be) Free People

Socialists have learned that they don’t need guns or a revolution just the right words and policies in order to create a non violent revolution. This revolution which has been going on for about 100 years is now out in the forefront. These communists are legally using our own rules and laws and yes even the constitution.

In the early 1940’s the CIC (called CIA today) brought over 1600 communists from Germany to America in “Operation Paperclip”. Brilliant minds we were told. They will bring innovation and creation in science and technology. Just one problem where did many of them go? They became professors in our finest universities. What did they teach? Communism. Why? Because they were communists.

In 1958, Eisenhower sent a commission to the Soviet Union in order to “understand” merge our cultures. Many of our “leaders’ studied in Russia: Bill Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Obama to name a few. This was the beginning of the normalizing of communism in America. Today they have named themselves Globalists, Progressives, Democratic Socialists, Leftists, and they have partnered with the Islamists. Their school is called the Aspen Institute where our leaders go to be told what to do to bring America into the One World Government Global structure. Look at the leadership. RINOS we call them on the right. Democrats we call the left. Communists I say. Who attended Aspen Institute: Paul Ryan, Romney, Rubio, Debbie Wasserman Shultz to name a few.

“We will Fundamentally Transform America,” Obama proclaimed. “We will change History,” Michelle added. Not one person ever asked Obama what fundamentally changing America meant. No one asked Michelle how do you change history? But yet we changed. Fundamentally Transform means Destroy and Changing History means Lie. And by silence we complied.

Today students learn our heroes of the past are the villains of today and the villains are heroes. Hitler, because of too much evidence is the chosen villain. All who oppose the communists are racist, bigots etc. and are compared to Hitler. Hitler killed 6million Jews + millions of Christians, Gypsies, Gay and anyone in opposition. The other dictators like Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Papa Doc, Kim Jong Il, Saddam Hussein and Castro who killed many more people in ethnic cleansing genocide became freedom fighter and heroes.

This list are some of the results of socialist policies currently in America.

Single Payer
Education, NCLB , Race to the Top, Common Core
Green New Deal, Sustainability, Smart Cities, Smart Cars, Smart appliances
Alexa
Gun Control
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Eliminating fossil fuel, meat, straws
Man Made Global Warming
Abortion
Drugs, Liquor, Addiction
Sex, Sex or Human Trafficking
Selling Body Parts
Giving away technology
Crumbling infrastructure
Selling American land and resources to Communist China, Russia
Open Border
Forcing Americans to pay for immigrants and illegal entitlements
Accepting radicals as “normal” calling them just a lone wolf
Regionalism allowing unelected bureaucrats to have the law making power
Loss of personal property in the name of fairness
Forcing people to act against their belief system
Affirmative Action now in SAT
Food Stamps
Demonizing law enforcement

All these programs have two things in common: They don’t work and are overly expensive . Slowly drip by drip America becomes a debtor nation weak in values and morality. Change the culture, change the country.

GOLD is the money of the KINGS, SILVER is the money of the GENTLEMEN, BARTER is the money of the PEASANTS, but DEBT is the money of the SLAVES!! ! Money trap: How banks control the world

An individual can only think of one thought at a time. If that though is channeled through emotion the results become more defined and often violent. So we allow communists to teach our children to be victims and to be jealous, envious or angry at those who are perceived to have more. When riots and destruction of property rule, chaos is the result. Then screaming for the chaos to end we accept tightening the noose of control around a once free society.

In order to complete their plan, the enemies of America, Israel, Capitalism, The West have united. They understand that there is more force in unity. Their goal is a One World Government headed by the United Nations. Recently the Pope has proclaimed that there is a one world religion. Will the next lie for Sunday school will be something like twisting the role of Jesus? What if your children learned – Jesus is the son of G-d. Allah is G-d therefore Jesus is the son of Allah. Forget about that last supper. Forget about any meaning to anything you learned. They will get the Christians to join Islamists and kill Jews because Jews killed Jesus. As Michelle said, ‘change the history”. And we affirm by our silence.

One thing is certain, every industry, every value, every form of freedom and independence will disappear under socialism for

Everything is connected
Nothing happens randomly
There are no coincidences
Everything has a plan
All plans are based on lies.

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” —Hitler

We see that playing out by Russiagate. The Democrat Party felt that by lying, they could overthrow the Presidency of Donald Trump. The media is still carrying that message. If there are no consequences for these actions, this corruption will continue.

Is America Worth Saving?

“Because without America there is no free world.” Canada Free Press

The future of America is in your hands. If the Boomers know the truth and are silent what will be America’s future? Once more the “greatest generation” is called upon to act o save America. We must call out the lies.

Will you call your Congressman on a regular basis and tell them to close the borders, get rid of common core, no medicare for all (aka medicine for none). Will you correct them when they call America a democracy? Will you fight to keep the Electoral College? Will you call them out and say, “you lie.” “One of the reasons people hate politics is that truth is rarely a politician’s objective. Election and power are.” Cal Thomas. Usually when a politician speaks, I think the opposite of what they say is the truth. Very few speak the truth.

Right now there are more Americans than Globalists but our silence is deafening.

Will you pick a topic and become an expert on the truth? Mine is education for I believe that education is the easiest for us to gain a foothold. Using equality and diversity we can force the teaching of the “other side” of America. Imagine how we can foil their plan by taking all of these legal and illegal immigrants and giving them a great dose of traditional America. We can flip this DEAL just by telling the truth in schools. Education is not just about going to school and getting a degree. It’s about widening your knowledge and absorbing the truth about life. Shakuntala Devi. Preparing for life means to become self sufficient not dependency on a government handout or taking from another.

A revolution needs foot soldiers. The Communists are great at organizing. Their chief Obama has put the wheels in motion. Will you organize truth warriors in your communities? Will you call out the social media giants and do as the left does, boycott? Will you join, march when necessary, donate when you can? Most important will you just keep talking. Never quit the conversation. Never quit.

Need a refresher course? Here are some great places to start:

1.     “Crimes of the Educators” –Alex Newmann
2.     “Socialism: A Warning from the Dead” – Glenn Beck
3.     “Plundered – How Progressive Ideology is Destroying America” – Michael Coffman, PhD.
4.     “The 5000 Year Leap” – W. Cleon Skousen
5.     “The Naked Communist” – W Cleon Skousen
6.     45 Communist Goals read into the Congressional Record.

Only Americans can “save America”.

Social Justice is Extortive SLAVERY

From here:

Teaching Social Justice is un-American

June 17, 2019 Posted by Karen Schoen, Educator, Applying Knowledge Is Power

Social justice forces a herd mentality as people are pushed together and defined by one commonality like race, ethnicity, etc. The issues are usually to which the herd has no control. These singled out groups are pitted against others in order to ignite some form of hate and victimization. The opposition is everyone else who disagreed and has treated the herd in some unimaginable way as decided by the herd leader. Riots, destruction of property, destruction of reputation, boycotts, law suits then follow as the marching orders of the herd is to take no prisoners and destroy the opposition.

Sadly the American silent majority allows this to happen and the herd is often treated like 2 year olds throwing their usual temper tantrum. Leave them alone, give them the inch, let them be, is often taught as the way to deal with the herd. Tolerance and political correctness are tools used to control the majority. Comply we do. As a result 99% of the population must change their way of life to accommodate the 1% group making the most noise.

Think about that. The globalists scream we are a democracy (America is not. America is a constitutional republic). Yet in this case the demands of the 1% rule the 99%. Why? Because no one challenges the victims? The majority is afraid of ??? being called names like racist, homophobe, islamaphobe, toxic, white supremacy, etc.

We have become so conditioned to be tolerant that we have allowed the lunatics to run the asylum. What happened to words like: Show me some evidence of what you are saying? How many times have we heard, “……..is violating the constitution?

Yet no one ever says show me where? What did he/she violate. We are destroying our democracy…but no one ever says That’s because we are not a democracy. No one ever says what % of the population does that affect? You can win anything if you don’t engage. What ever happened to, “Sticks and Stones can break my bones but words can never harm me“?

I read Agenda21/2030 aka Green New Deal, aka Sustainable Development. Did you? You can find it on agenda21today.com. If we do nothing let’s see according to their plans how your life will change…

So what if:

Your Government has determined that you have accumulated more wealth than your neighbors? That is not acceptable as the requirement of Social Justice demands that wealth be shared. You will be required to share your wealth to make room for other less fortunate families. In preparation of implementing Social Justice, you will now be required to register all bedrooms in your home. Many people already did this by answering on line surveys.

Don’t fill out surveys? Not to worry. Your child/grandchild will register information on the National Data Base, as required in the Race to the Top grant. This information will be stored on the National Data Base and will be shared with all government/corporate agencies (for your protection) to monitor your compliance with the program. A chip with all of your private – banking, health, political etc. information is now embedded in your credit/ debit/ benefit cards, drivers license, ID cards, etc. Eventually your net pay will be deposited on your card. As long as you are good and say nothing derogatory about the government, you will keep your money. Speak out and the government can debit your account. (remember Communist China has already implemented this program called the Social Credit card.)

According to Sustainable Development, aka Agenda 21/2030, aka Green New Deal, you and your spouse are entitled to 700 sq ft. 900sq ft for a family of 4. Your family can occupy 1 bedroom. Each of the other bedrooms will be assigned to another family. This program is open to all residents of your town, legal or illegal, working or not. You will be required to clothe, feed, educate, as well as to provide shelter, transportation and medical attention to all people living in your home. The Pope is calling for this today. Instead of fighting ISIS, they want you to share your wealth and get the ISIS members a “job”.. The Pope says you must give up your wealth. Giving up your wealth will help the refugees, will stop climate change, will provide social economic justice or will it?

Continuing, your family can only have 1 car, which you will be unable to drive because fuel prices will necessarily skyrocket. You will be required to redistribute all other cars to those living in your home.

You will register your income so it can be divided equally among those living in your home. Under NO circumstances will those living in your home be required to pay or assist in any services required for the upkeep of your home. They are not obligated to you for any reason, it is just your obligation to pay for them since you accumulated too much wealth and wealth must be shared equally.

Once the registration is complete, when you die, you will transfer ownership of your home or business to the State. Private property is not acceptable under a Social Justice program because home ownership is not equal. You might have a 1300 sq ft home and someone else may have a 3000 sq ft home. That is not fair. Don’t want to register, do not worry; your child will be able to complete this registration in the national data base required in Race to the Top.

If you need any references as to how this program works, we refer you to those models of implementation of Social Justice in Cuba, Argentina, Venezuela, Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia and China.

If you feel that you have been selected unfairly, then contact the department of Equality and tell them. You will wind up in a reeducation camp gulag until you agree. You will no longer live in the Constitutional Republic of America, instead you now live in the Global Socialist Democracy of America.

Teaching Social Justice is un-American.

Is America Worth Saving? Will you take action?

Demand that communist/ socialist/ globalist programs be removed from the schools. Demand that the Bill of Rights, American exceptionalism, nationalism, history, civics, and economics be returned to the curriculum.

Home school whenever possible. Can’t home school? Go to your Pastor. Tell your Pastor it is time to start a CCS free church school. Go to your school demand to see every piece of paper your child receives in school. Correct all mistakes and demand these boards and programs be removed from school.

Go to your school board and demand these books and programs removed form school Replace them with one of the many American exceptional curricula. The test scores are in and CCS has failed miserably. Why are we torturing our children year after year with programs that prepare them for NOTHING? Why are we forcing them to change their belief systems? The answer, MONEY, POWER, CONTROL. Read: “Under Common Core, Federally Funded Study Shows Students’ Test Scores Have Sunk” By Joy Pullman

Do you value your freedom of choice? Will you work for our children, our country?

Do you know: President Obama signed an executive order which authorizes federal agencies to conduct behavioral experiments on U.S. citizens in order to advance government initiatives. He then signed another order allowing all agencies to intermingle data and report on American citizens aka spying. We are seeing how the government acts with unchallenged power. Look at the lives ruined for no reason other than they helped Trump.

“A growing body of evidence demonstrates that behavioral science insights — research findings from fields such as behavioral economics and psychology about how people make decisions and act on them — can be used to design government policies to better serve the American people,” reads the executive order.

The new program is the end result of a policy proposal the White House floated in 2013 entitled “Strengthening Federal Capacity for Behavioral Insights.”

According to a document released by the White House at that time, the program was modeled on one implemented in the U.K. in 2010. That initiative created a Behavioral Insights Teams, which used “iterative experimentation” to test “interventions that will further advance priorities of the British government.”

The initiative draws on research from University of Chicago economist Richard Thaler and Harvard law school professor Cass Sunstein, who was also dubbed Obama’s regulatory czar. The two behavioral scientists argued in their 2008 book “Nudge” that government policies can be designed in a way that “nudges” citizens towards certain behaviors and choices.

The desired choices almost always advance the goals of the federal government, though they are often presented as ways to cut overall program spending.

In its 2013 memo, which was reported by Fox News at the time, the White House openly admitted that the initiative involved behavioral experimentation.

“The federal government is currently creating a new team that will help build federal capacity to experiment with these approaches, and to scale behavioral interventions that have been rigorously evaluated, using, where possible, randomized controlled trials,” the memo read.

That document cited examples from the U.K. which showed that sending out a letter to late taxpayers which read “9 out of 10 people in Britain pay their taxes on time” led to a 15 percent increase in compliance.

The new executive order encourages federal agencies to “identify policies, programs, and operations where applying behavioral science insights may yield substantial improvements in public welfare, program outcomes, and program cost effectiveness,” as well as to “develop strategies for applying behavioral science insights to programs and, where possible, rigorously test and evaluate the impact of these insights.”

Once you recognize these programs for what they are – Freedom and Liberty eliminators, you can challenge them. If you are silent, we will lose America. Are you ready for that?

“Without America there is no free world.” Canadian Free Press.