Masochists Are Hypocrites and Women Are Masochists

THERE'S A REASON MUHAMMAD PROCLAIMED THERE'S MORE WOMEN IN HELL!

Here's my take on a recent article by someone so un-PC that he's been censored everywhere by everyone!

First, the main arguments from the banned article itself (then as usual my binary take on it all)!

=================

"Leftists are fundamentally of a feminine mindset, and thus the disconnect between their wants and their demands. They want to be dominated, and to incur that dominant force they demand freedom and rebel against all boundaries, seeking the masculine will to compel their obedience. When you give them what they demand, they just increase the insanity of their demands waiting for you to figure out the game, and give them what they want, but cannot ask for. To ask for domination would be to spoil the fun, as one who dominates on command creates a paradox.

Viewed that way, their political activities make a lot more sense. Most conservatives think leftists are crazy and incoherent, and from our perspective they certainly fit such a description. A more thorough analysis however, reveals a clearer picture.

Take for example a recent piece in Rolling Stone, which laments Trump’s musings about a third term as President. New York Magazine likewise frets about Trump becoming “President for Life”.

Neither mentions the fact that repeal of the 22nd Amendment, which has imposed Presidential term limits since 1951, was actually proposed by Democrat Representative Jose Serrano of New York in 2009, when Democrats still held complete control of the Federal Government. Indeed, a whole 7 years after that, Vox’s own Matthew Yglesias said “The 22nd Amendment was a solution in search of a problem” when he proposed a third term for Obama in 2016.

The first thing that comes to the conservative mind of course is, were it not for double standards, Leftists would have no standards at all. While their guy is in office, the 22nd Amendment is a hindrance to their power to be discarded. Yet, when our guy is in power, idle tweeting about what voters might want in six years is a threat to democracy! Hypocrites!

But there is no hypocrisy. Leftists want more than anything for someone far more ruthless than Donald Trump to deprive them of their political power. If they said so, that would defeat the purpose. So instead of making the demand, they simply act like complete lunatics on the instinct that responsible adults will do the right thing.

Today,

Recall the arson and riots Leftists staged at University of California Berkeley when Milo Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak. Our fellow conservatives marveled at the irony of such censorious mayhem taking place at the “home of the free speech movement”. Yet, again, it makes sense when you think of a Leftist as a battered wife who likes to be hit. Leftists pushed the boundaries of free speech, not because they wanted free speech, but because they wanted responsible adults to shut them up.

When the adults failed to do this, the Leftists found themselves wielding the awesome powers of the United States Federal Government, and using that power, they obtained control over corporations and ultimately the entire economy, and once firmly vested with omnipotence, they swiftly set about dismantling the same freedoms they had obtained, because deep down, they knew it was foolish all along.

And now, as their power fades, they demand more control than ever. “Take away the guns!” they shout at the supposed fascist dictator they pretend to hate. “Don’t you dare bring transparency to the intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement!” they cry, as the man they once tried to frame for a crime, now wields the powers they had used to do so.

The key to understanding Leftists is to look beyond their words, and see what they are maneuvering toward. Just like your wife or girlfriend is seeking reassurance when she asks you if that dress makes her butt look fat, Leftists are absolutely begging for a firm hand when they scream “TYRANT!” in the face of their betters."

=================

Since they despair and presume nobody can ever predict and counter all the seemingly random, pain-causing damage in the world, and that they thus have no ultimate right of control over their own bodies and lives, all delinquent criminals hold that they therefore also can have no ultimate responsibility over their lives and behaviour, either. (And that's basic Islam101, too).

Therefore, masochists aren't brave pain-lovers, they are really ever only cowards who seek to end or at least pretend to be able to control the only pains they can control or end: their own generalized, remembered fears of previous specific pains, projected to the future, aka their own fears. Naturally, such a stance where they pretend they have no chance of choosing to heed their own internally-generated fears in order to avoid future pain-causing damages while earning them the right to cancel their fears of same by completing the cycle of avoiding them, also instantly kills their own thought processes because our brains prioritize our solid fears over both our fluid and ongoing hopes of our still-fear-tainted greedy submissions to less of it, and we quite naturally also put solid-feeling fear before the ultimately useless and nebulous-feeling hope of no pain.

“Never has our future been more unpredictable, never have we depended so much on political forces that cannot be trusted
to follow the rules of common sense and self-interest—forces that look like sheer insanity, if judged by the standards of other centuries.” 

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism - 

ALL masochists habitually pretend to be able to "control" their fears, BY causing and/or by criminally, negligently allowing or inducing others to cause those very same worst-case scenario problems which cause the pains they fear the most! This way, the real pain cancels the "additional" pains of the fears. So masochists aren't brave, they're still no more than pathetic (and potentially dangerous to others) cowards at heart.

All so-called "mental illness" (thought-killing 'psycho-pathy;' broken-skull 'schizo-phrenia') is hypocrisy - wanting the most impossible double standards: to ultimately have only hope and no fear or pain; to have only rights and no responsibilities; to 'still have one's cake and eat it, too!' To achieve this, people must deliberately ignore dynamic cause and effect sequencings to reverse them - but first they must hold their own common emotions as morals, 'ethics,' and even as 'spiritual' guidance; so they must hold protecting their own feelings and 'self-image' over reality: that they are no different or better than others.

It is possible that confounding one's own brain's natural pattern-recognition ability - by conflating dynamic perceptions and static conceptions, (altering memories; ideas; ideals; idols) one may become a literal "ideot" (as it was previously spelled).

They thus must also believe in me-vs-them, and also to pretend to believe in might-makes-right - that they can force the issue, possibly even by voting for it; but in the end they can really ever only seize more rights by offloading their own responsibilities onto others by enslaving them - by depriving them of their rights to defend themselves from the criminals, leaving them only the responsibility to become and remain their slaves.

Let's just call all criminals and other group-might-makes-right, us-vs-them and ends-justify-means gangster "Totalitarians" who want to totally control the lives of everyone else, (for instance, those who currently self-identify as "communists," "socialists," "fascists," "liberals," and "muslims") "SLAVERS!"

Because slavery is still totally common, even these days. It's just that most people haven't thought it through - yet.

;-)