CRIMETHINK

While hypocrites (and all criminals are hypocrites, just as all hypocrites are criminals) by definition always embrace double standards where they are always right and heroic victims, while everyone else is always their wrongful oppressors, such that they are forever entitled to pity, while those who refuse to pity them as equally helpless victims deserve only angry hate; they also like to pretend that, whenever this static self-image of theirs gets confronted by the real dynamic hard and cold facts of real life, they regress to their second position, wherein, since they were proven wrong, it was only a mistake, not a crime, to always slanderously, fraudulently project and accuse their intended victims of the very crimes they were committing.

So suddenly, their position seems to reverse itself, to a point where everyone is such a "victim;" allegedly, "Because we - i.e: you - all do it, (act like hypocrites all the time) too! Whee!" I other words, whenever they are caught committing their crimes, suddenly their position becomes that they are STILL always right, because everyone else is still always wrong, "too!"

Now they portray everyone as an equally helpless victim of mysteriously unknowably unknown (yet known to be) inevitable forces.

Such "Libertines'" main position is that THERE IS NO FREE-WILL choice, and therefore also never any criminal intent to accuse them of. Therefore, the only realistic, shrewd, and smart thing to do, is to (CHOOSE) to Submit to and accept that "fact," and enjoy the freedom that CHOICE of criminally-negligent delinquency to one's only Golden Rule responsibility delinquency brings.

Yet whenever they make a real mistake, they almost always immediately try to justify it by committing an intentional crime, by either (or both) initially  denying they did it at all, or that it wasn't a mistake at all ("Screw you - I MEANT to do that")!

Either way, the choice of alibi to excuse their mistake or criminal desires (being by definition not a valid reason) was a lie.

And lies are, of course, the most basic form of (at least, attempted) theft - the theft of the Truth. All crimes are crimes of theft, and all crimes are forms of attack, where to attack is to do anything the other people did not agree to in advance; and "even only" attempted crimes, are still crimes. [Libertines, of course, try holding to the - mislabeled - "civil law" standard, where, if there is no harm (if and when the "merely attempted" crime did not succeed) then there is no foul (punitive result)].

And, since they like to pretend that, "Since" life is too complex for anyone to ever really be able to understand causes and effects (if such speculative hypothetical things even really exist at all in the first place) then "since" all so-called objective "facts" are also thereby really only ever subjective opinions, their entirely fact-free subjective opinions are the diversely opposite equals to your silly objective facts; but in reality, in claiming that they can not and will never be able to understand anything (or at least, by doing so, have asserted their confession that they have no intention of ever trying to) they have declared them selves non-compus-mentis, and, in abdicating their own responsibilities, thereby also lose their rights to further participate in public debates and contracts, and so should, by their own admission, be locked up for their own good.

It should be obvious to every sane non-criminal hypocrite person that all criminals pretend to believe, and act, in this way: all "liberals" and "muslims" hold to these exact same free-will and so criminal intent avoiding lack of principle "principles."

Even Muhammad himself, when founding his "islam" by enshrining such unprinciples as holy law, was only a "prophet" in noticing how human hypocrisy is simply such an easily predictable loopy circular "reasoning," culpability-avoiding idolatrous tautology.

None of this is mental "illness" in any  way, although the symptoms of such a criminal choice are what is described as such by the hypocrites in the so-called "Mental Illness/Health" industry, which takes a 'diseased victim" approach to all of society.

To criminals, when rationally assessing the potential risks vs rewards to make such a choice, the ends (enriching them selves) justify the means (extorting and enslaving others) because of course all crime is also slavery, as the criminals' chosen thefts have thus also thereby retroactively forced their victim to have worked to produce the stolen items for the criminals for free.