Anti-"Racist" CPC Leadership Candidate Erin O'Foole Says He Wants To Stop Sharia Law - By Coddling Muslims!

I received this pathetic, defensively blustering, liberal-like screed from Conservative Party of Canada "front-runner" Leadership candidate Erin O'Toole today, so I just had to deconstruct and destroy it!

==============================================

Want to Stop Sharia Law?

Vlad:

For weeks, an organized and deliberate campaign of hate and racism has attacked me and my team.

First from the bowels of the fake news dark web.

Then via emails from a candidate who has spent years tearing Conservatives down and wasting member donations by suing the Party.  

[He means this guy fellow leadership candidate Jim Karahalios, who is obviously far more honest!]

And finally, through the silence and condoning by certain other candidates.

These attacks have attempted to make an issue of the religion of one of my senior advisors.

Let’s be clear. They are doing it because he’s a Muslim.

It doesn’t matter that he has volunteered on every Conservative campaign for 30 years.

It doesn’t matter that Premier Ford appointed him to be the Government of Ontario’s Chair of the Capital Markets Task Force.

He’s a Muslim.

For 12 years, I wore the uniform of our country and took an oath to defend the Canadian values of freedom, democracy, and the rule of law.

I will always fight back against any threat to those principles, at home and abroad, including Sharia Law.

Repeat: I will always fight against Sharia Law.

Any suggestion otherwise is preposterous, tinfoil hat thinking.

The fact that I even have to say this is profoundly sad.

But I will also fight back against racism and religious persecution.

I am proud to have Christians, Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, Hindus, and probably a few Atheists, on my team.

I am proud to have LGBTQ people on my team.

I am proud to have so many women in senior roles on my team.

I am proud to have social conservatives, defence hawks, progressive and fiscal conservatives on my team.

This team reflects the Conservative Party I want to build, and the Canada I want to lead.

This team reflects the diversity of our Party. A diversity that we have failed to showcase to Canadians because a few loud-mouthed racists are tarring our reputation.

Do you want to stop Sharia Law and its persecution of women, the LGBTQ community, and anyone who isn’t a follower?

Start with a leader who fights back against persecution.

I’m Erin O’Toole, and I cannot believe I had to approve this message.

If you're fed up too, join my fight (AGAINST "HATEFUL RACIST BIGOTS")!

Erin O'Toole           

==============================================

So - here we go!

Dear Erin:              

I must honestly challenge you on the apparent lack of accuracy in most of your statements in this email:

Re: (1.) "For weeks, an organized and deliberate campaign of hate and racism has attacked me and my team.
(2.) I will always fight against Sharia Law. But I will also fight back against racism and religious persecution.
(3.) I am proud to have Christians, Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, Hindus, and probably a few Atheists, on my team.
(4.) This team reflects the diversity of our Party. A diversity that we have failed to showcase to Canadians because a few loud-mouthed racists are tarring our reputation.

Let's break this down:

(1.) Hatred of crimes and the criminals who commit them isn't a bad thing. And "muslim" isn't a race - it denotes a membership, however hereditary, in the world's oldest and largest ongoing crime and murder gang.

(2.) Sharia law is nothing more or less than the precepts and principles of the Qur'an itself, codified into practical applications for daily life. Islam itself is religious persecution. Blaming a "god" for one's own criminal desires and actions does not excuse murder and all other crimes perpetrated against those intended victims designated as unfaithful ("infidel") unbelievers. And again: "muslim" is not a "race" at all (much less one of poor oppressed swarthy victimal "People of Colour," as our sly liberal opponents have been pretending for all too long. You seem to be joining their chorus to secure votes and avoid hurting people's pwecious feewings.

(3.) Would you be equally proud to have members of the MAFIA on your team, too? What about KKK members? Tong or Triad gangsters? Hell's Angels, perhaps? Islam is a crime-gang; muslims are holy mobster gangsters.

(4.) "Yaay, diverthity!" You're echoing liberal talking points, that "diversity is our greatest strength!" - which is like claiming that disunity makes us stronger. This is liberal communal crap: appeals to "diversity" treat people not as individuals, as I'm sure *might* be your underlying point here, were you honest and smart enough to have sussed it out on your own before now - but as members of a collective - racial, ethnic, or gender. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what you just tried bragging about, here: "I am proud to have Christians, Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, Hindus, and probably a few Atheists, on my team. I am proud to have LGBTQ people on my team. I am proud to have so many women in senior roles on my team."

What you *should* have said - but, all-too-tellingly, didn't - is something along the lines of "It doesn't matter to me what group identity politics category any of us would otherwise fall into (global crime-gang memberships excepted, of course!) and so it doesn't matter to me what your religion, sex or 'gender,' or age is: We're all conservatives here, and as such, we all believe in the uniqueness of every individual - except for all crime-gang mobsters who are in literal lock-step as proudly unreasonable mind-slaves of their imaginary 'god,' of course."

Erin, its painfully obvious that you're shooting your mouth off, blustering away without having even the slightest idea about any of even the most basic tenets of the islamic creed.

"Sharia" IS islam, and islam IS "sharia:"

Muhammad was also known as "al-Shari" (the Law-Bringer) and the legality of "sharia" (the word itself simply means "law") is based on Qur'an Sura 4:65:

"Nay! O Muhammad - by your Lord - they will never be true believers until they accept you as a judge in their disputes, then they do not find any resentment in their hearts against your verdicts and accept them with complete submission."

"Sharia" simply means "law," - in their case, as based on the commandments in the Qur'an and the explanatory ahadith, stories from the life of Muhammad, etc - and it's all or nothing.

ALL muslims are criminals: by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an, which tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-muslims, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being muslims:

“Slay the non-muslims wherever you find them,” (Qur'an 9:5), “Strike upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip,” (Qur'an 8:12) and “Fight them until there is no unbelief and the religion, all of it, is for Allah” (Qur'an 8:39).

And they have no choice - islam isn't cafeteria catholicism, it's all or nothing (sura 2:85) and so if they give evidence they aren't toeing the line, the others must murder them for hypocrisy (4:86).

Therefore all muslims call them selves "muslims" and not "islamists," or "radicals," or "moderates!"

So the Qur'an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat. In fact, it's quite accurate to note that the Qur'an is what you'd get if Hitler had written the Bible.

Again: The Qur'an tells it's muslim mind-slaves that they are in fact SO "superior" to all the non-members of their war and plunder cult, that it's not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims in the world, simply for the "crime" of not being muslims!

So "muslims" are nothing more than criminals, pedophile murderers who dress up in the robes and beards of religious men, waving fake bibles, yelling about "god" to cover up their criminal natures to get closer to their victims.

ALL muslims are criminals, as being members of the ancient, ongoing global extortion racket called islam. In sharia law texts, muslims are SUPPOSED to be regarded as threats (as "objects of fear") by all the unbelievers, whether or not the individual muslim has itself actually committed any crimes. (As documented in the Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, INSTITUTES, on pages 154 & 157); and in the Qur'an, via Suras 8:57 & 60.

That's why we have laws against simply being a MEMBER of a crime-gang or 'criminal enterprise' because their general membership endorses and represents the inherent threat the gang presents. Threats are crimes in themselves: they are psychological attacks, also known as intimidation, bullying, coercion, duress, harassment, activist agitation, extortion, and “terrorism.”

And even any “only" attempted crimes are still considered by civilized people to be crimes.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

- Muhammad -

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

And since "allah" forced him to commit them, they were never really "crimes" at all in the first place!

Everything muslims pretend to see as "holy" is already a crime!

Bottom line? Islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where its holy-mobster crime-gang members say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

;-)

The Qur’an clearly and very specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur'an:

1: non-muslims are bad, (allegedly because they insult allah by dividing his nature*);
2: muslims are good, (allegedly because to them allah is the cause of everything*);
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims' heads.
("Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him").

It's all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn't by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9; 9:29 demands all non-muslims be fought, extorted, and enslaved because they don't believe in Muhammad's 'allah').

That is, the Qur'an demands muslims wage offensive war - not in self-defense - but because of others' "disbelief!"

So islam is against even the corrupted, "Live and Let Live" version of The Golden Rule; islam always attacks first.

In the end, sharia is NOT law, it is codified crime.

Pretending that the global crime-gang called islam is a “race” of poor swarthy animal-people, oppressed by the mentally superior whites, in order to slander everyone who notices it’s a crime-gang as a hatefully bigoted “racist” – is to deliberately enable that crime-gang’s crimes by hiding and destroying the evidence of same, and thus to be a willing accessory to those crimes.

Everyone who defends islam and muslims endorses crime.
Endorsing crime IS a crime, so those doing it are criminals.

Right in the Qur'an is: the obligation to murder Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize all non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one's true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on all the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).

Are death-threats legal? NO.
Is extortion legal? NO.
Is slavery legal? NO.
Is murder legal? NO.
Is rape legal? NO.

THEN ISLAM IS ILLEGAL!

Rape, slavery, robbery, extortion and murder are never OK!

Again: Everything muslims pretend to see as "holy" is already a crime!

So nobody has a legal right to practice islam anywhere on earth!

IN TRYING TO MAKE CRITICISM OF THE GLOBAL CRIME GANG CALLED “ISLAM” INTO A CRIME, TO PROTECT THAT CRIME GANG BY HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF ITS CRIMES, SUCH PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS AND TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY, CIVILIZATION, AND HUMANITY ITSELF.

Worse, being constructively angry at ("hateful" towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while uselessly pitying ("tolerating") them all as "equally-helpless fellow victims," is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, criminals must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking - through an emotional, sub-conscious "narrative" - so much so, that the only advice we hear from "our" hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

"Anyone who doesn't automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!"

Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a "hateful" crime itself!

BOTTOM LINE: Erin, you're putting emotions (primarily pity for those you claim are perpetually righteous victims, no matter what the facts might be, which thereby implicitly slanders those who oppose that lie as their wrongful oppressors, who thus deserve only anger) over, reason, logic, facts and truth. That's pretty-much the very definition of "corruption," and it has no place in our Party, as it betrays rationality and Civilization itself.

Ask your "award-winning, Conservative" muslim advisor exactly what parts of the above are incorrect, and, when he fails to find any untruth there, which parts of the Qur'an and sahih ahadith he disagrees with, if any (because he's officially not allowed to disagree with ANY of it); and then ask which parts are his favourites - and if they endorse peace, ask him to prove they weren't all later "abrogated" under the doctrine of naskh.

We both know he can't and so, you won't - dare to question his "faith" in his crime-and-murder god. Because that would be rude, and might hurt his pwecious feewings, too. Erin, you sound exactly like Justin Trudeau.

I've been a soldier in the Middle East, too - and in the Conservative Party for nearly 40 years, but, after this disgraceful liberal-like pandering attempt, I'm no longer supporting you. You have betrayed Civilization itself.

-Vladdi Basarab -

Ottawa

GLOBAL GENOCIDE EASILY EXPLAINED

Today, David Horowitz wrote a lede to this article by Bruce Thornton, asking which virus was the most dangerous - the coronoavirus, or the "NeverTrump virus" aka "liberalism?" or - let's face it - all-too common hypocrisy writ large. So, having re-posted his article, I've also posted my response to them both beneath it:

Which Virus Is More Dangerous?

Hint: it's not the one the media is hyping.

Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

The two big stories these days are the COVID-19 outbreak and the Democrat presidential primaries. The former is filled with the media’s apocalyptic hysteria about a disease that for now is less deadly than the yearly flu. The latter’s drama comes from the DNC’s and Democrat big donors’ success in neutralizing Bernie Sanders’ candidacy and all but ensuring that an addled mediocrity ends up being the Dems’ presidential candidate in November.

The Democrat primaries, however, are in large part a manifestation of the political virus that has infected the body politic for over three years, and that in the long run is more dangerous than the coronavirus: COVFEFE-45, popularly known as Trump Derangement Syndrome. The coronavirus will eventually be contained, as previous viral outbreaks have been over the last few decades. TDS, on the other hand, may pave the way for the Dems’ control of the government come November. Such an outcome will mark a quantitative leap in the century-long dismantling of the Constitutional order that defends our political freedom.

The two diseases have converged in the NeverTrumpers’ attempts to blame the coronavirus on President Trump. A Politico headline sums it up: “Trump’s Mismanagement Helped Fuel Coronavirus Crisis.” A common sense response like barring travelers from China, ground zero of the outbreak, is called “xenophobia” and “racism.” Delays in getting test-kits available are laid at Trump’s feet, as though he directly manages their manufacture and distribution. Trump’s efforts to tamp down the panic are called callous indifference, though we all know if he’d been more urgent about the dangers, the media would have faulted him for stoking a panic.

As usual, all these criticisms never address the important caveat: Compared to what?

How about considering Barack Obama’s response to the 2009 swine flu outbreak? Journalist James Lileks has done so on his blog The Bleat. Obama declared the outbreak a national emergency only after four months, when the toll in the U.S. had reached 1000 dead (as of this writing, 32 have died in the U.S. of the coronavirus, the vast majority over 70 years old). More importantly, the media coverage of the swine flu––even though it was more deadly and half its victims, unlike the coronavirus, were healthy and young––was nowhere near the breathless hysteria or extent of the coverage today.

We know the explanation for the disparity. Barack Obama enjoyed eight years of the media’s “slobbering love affair,” as Bernie Goldberg called it, filled with uncritical, laudatory, and selective coverage from the mainstream media, whereas Trump has been incessantly attacked with slanted or outright mendacious stories based on tendentious analysis and anonymous leaks. Examples abound. Barack Obama is caught on a hot mic promising Putin’s flunkey “flexibility” on missile-defense after his reelection, and the media yawn. Trump urges the president of Ukraine to investigate his country’s meddling in the 2016 election and, its notorious corruption that involves a U.S. Vice President’s son, and he’s impeached on the made-up charge of “abusing his authority.” This is just one example from a lengthy catalogue of journalistic moral idiocy and professional malfeasance.

The cause, of course, is TDS. The bipartisan technocratic, globalist elite, a product of progressivism’s success in undermining the Constitution, has been infuriated by Trump’s penchant for breaking every rule of the techno-political guild. Their gatekeeping and paradigm-protecting notions of “decorum” and “democratic norms” were shattered, their serial failures both at home and abroad exposed, and their illiberal, politically correct manners mocked and ridiculed. But worse than those offenses was Trump’s success in unleashing the economy from Obama’s shackles, and taking off the kick-me sign our foreign-policy mavens had hung on America’s back for decades. Particularly galling to them was Trump’s abandonment of the appeasing and dangerous Iran nuclear deal, and the economically suicidal and useless Paris Climate Accords. These two moves starkly exposed the folly of the “rules-based international order” that the globalist elites used to camouflage and justify their failures.

So no surprise that the progressives and their Republican NeverTrump collaborators have been seeking to undermine and terminate Trump’s presidency from its beginning. With supreme hypocrisy the Dems, who pioneered the “politics of personal destruction” starting with Nixon’s presidency, whine about his vulgar and insulting tweets. And NeverTrump Republicans go along, invoking lofty (and very anti-1st A) standards of “decorum” that they serially violate with their obsession over Trump’s blunt personality and lack of verbal sophistication and “nuance,” more often than not a device for disguising a failure of conviction and nerve.

Finally, the TDS virus if unchecked in November will further the destruction of the Constitutional order. The Founders created a limited central government whose primary aims were the protection of political freedom and the diversity of America’s peoples and states against the excess of majority or minority rule. The progressives’ vision is quite different: the concentration and expansion of federal power through government agencies and bureaus staffed with “experts” beyond accountability to the people. They sought to redefine the American peoples and their regional and cultural diversity into an abstract, homogeneous mass with uniform interests better served by a powerful central government.

For over a century we have been transforming into just that intrusive and redistributionist federal Leviathan, one nourished by politicians from both parties. Donald Trump, though he has been loath (scared) to attack the mechanism of redistribution through wealth transfers, has dismantled some of its infrastructure, most importantly the overweening, bloated federal agencies and their myriad regulations that erode the autonomy and freedom of individuals, civil society, and the states. He has discredited and humiliated the political correctness that the “managerial elite,” as James Burnham called it, has relied on to demonize and censor dissent, restoring the diversity of opinion and thought upon which our political freedom relies. His outsider status and blunt manner, shared with millions of Americans who do not live in the Acela Corridor and bicoastal technocratic cocoons, has discredited the elites’ pretension to superiority if only by inciting their hysterical, mendacious, and excessive attacks on him.

So no wonder the bipartisan NeverTrumpers are desperate, so much so that they have embraced socialist policies that are destructive to the public's fiscal and personal freedom, and have settled on two candidates that perhaps are the worst presidential aspirants at least since World War II. One is a cranky village explainer whose ignorance and rationalization of simple math and socialism’s blood-stained record are literally sophomoric; the other a corrupt career pol of limited achievement and intelligence now obviously worsened by cognitive dysfunctions.

By any sane calculation, neither of these incompetent buffoons should become president. But we don’t live in sane times. Our country’s major institutions in media, education, politics, and popular culture are dominated by bad ideas and Utopian policies an illiterate peasant in 1800 would know are dangerous fantasies. Unforeseen events like the coronavirus, or an extended economic downturn could cause disruptions that make such bad ideas attractive come November.

The coronavirus should peak by May, and the news-cycle will turn to the next shiny object. But the NeverTrump virus is a political bubonic plague that if unchecked will bring a halt to the last four years of resistance against the technocratic “soft” tyranny. That virus is the one that should concern us, for it is vastly more dangerous and lethal.

=============================================================

David (and Bruce), I don't think the plan is to wipe people out with Bill Gates' coronavirus, because both he and the Israelis already have a vaccine.

I think the plan is for the vaccine itself to sterilize people, while blaming that sterility on the coronavirus itself - and here's how and why:

Here's the latest, from earlier today:

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-research-center-to-announce-it-developed-coronavirus-vaccine-sources-say-1.8665074

Coupled with this little caveat:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8104477/Doctors-claim-new-coronavirus-cause-damage-mans-TESTICLES.html

Here's another strong hint that this has been in the works for quite some time:

https://nationalfile.com/cdc-posted-job-listings-for-quarantine-advisors-in-2019-months-before-coronavirus-pandemic/

But "WHY," sane people must ask? Cui Bono (Who Benefits) - and how do they think they will benefit from global genocide?!

It's astonishingly simple, really:

It's the corporate mindset. The corporazis are notoriously short-sighted idiots. Remember when they convinced women, who sat securely at home raising kids and enjoying unprecedented leisure time due to the inventions of the men who also went out to risk their lives earning shit wages to support them, were in stead being "enslaved" by those men, just so they could trick women into joining the workforce, to double their pool of available workers while cutting everyone's wages in half, not to mention sell women cancer-causing cigarettes as symbols of their 'freedom" (they originally held women's marches with cigarettes as "Freedom Torches!")? 

Well, the greedy morons forgot that when they screwed their own workers out of half their wages, they were also screwing over each other' customers, too! DUH! 

So their profits didn't increase at all, but cut everyone's disposable income in half, while also screwing them selves out of the replacement workers and future customers those women would have borne if they had been able to afford to stay home and bear them. 

So then they "had" to import hordes of feral muslim retards to prop up their worker/ customers' Ponzi pension pyramid plans (because since everyone takes out more than they put in, they always need an ever-greater number of morons to pay into the schemes at the front end) while expanding their markets to the rest of the world (aka "GLOBALIZATION") which once again punked everyone's wages while increasing their slave-pools of workers -  AND IMPOVERISHING THEIR NEW CUSTOMERS AT THE SAME TIME. Again. Rinse and repeat, retards! So now the whole world's economy is (VERY predictably) tanking, such that even bringing in hordes of foreign retards to replace us expensive smart innovative workers, to save on transportation costs from their 3rd-world shithole slave-pens, won't save it! They will at most have replaced creative White capitalism and commerce with stagnant feudal world slavery - a new and literally dark age from which no one will escape. EVER.

To reiterate, just because it's so damned obvious:

All because some short-sighted corporate shitbags wanted women to work, thus doubling their available workers' pool, while cutting everyone's wages in half; not produce children (aka new workers AND CUSTOMERS) so they told them that their men - who risked their lives to let them raise kids in luxury never seen before - were trying to enslave them, and besides, they're entitled to consequence-free "MUH ORGASMS!" anyway). After that fuck up, they "suddenly" and "inexplicably" found their customer base and profits shrinking (because every company's workers are each others' customers - DUH) so they "had to" expand their markets into other countries - until they achieved the same fuck-up rates there, not to mention their workers' promised Ponzi pyramid pension plan schemes have to have an ever-increasing input at the front end to be "sustainable," because obviously everyone who retires always takes out far more than they paid into them! 

So they have to import slave labor from their 3rd-world shithole slave-pens, because the shipping costs are killing them, too. Now their worker pool has once again doubled, while wages are being cut in half. Rinse and repeat! And their pet sales-puppet politicians not only will not, but can not do much to stop them, either.

And their Brazen Rule of criminal Chaos, which is that all is allowed, unless and until very specifically disallowed, in advance (and which is therefore also the exact opposite of The Golden Rule of Law moral principle, where all is forbidden, unless and until very specifically allowed in advance), means, by also being the "rule" of being an inveterate hypocrite - in which they always "project," that it seems like there's almost another, hidden psychological rule whereby they "must" send out a warning signal almost, as if in some sort of mystical rulebook, where they have to let you know something about their intended crimes in advance, before they do it to you.

Under their rule, silence means consent. And their favorite way of getting around The Golden Rule entirely, is to have people agree to be re-presented by politicians, who then agree to decriminalize and legalize all crimes in advance... you know, "Democrats." If and when (like libertine "liberal" criminals always do) everyone agrees to attack and be attacked in advance, because they like to pretend that, "since" life's too complex for anyone to ever be able to understand "causes and effects," if such things in fact really exist anyway, "then," since all so-called facts are really ever only opinions, their entirely fact-free subjective and hypocritical opinions (like, that they are always righteous victims, who always deserve everyone else's pity; and everyone who opposes that lie - er, "opinion" - are their wrongful oppressors, who therefore only deserve to be hated) are the diversely opposite equals to you Conservatives' silly objective "facts!" Whee!

But WTF (sane people might then be forced to ask) is the psychology behind deliberately planning genocide, just to save money (and, admittedly, to also avoid being killed by the mobs of starving unemployed)?!

That's also almost too simple to sum up in one page, but as you know, David, from being an author yourself, and one who has studied the libertine ways and thus also the "liberal" criminal mind:

All hypocrisy is based on baseless paranoid masochistic false accusations - aka slanderous FRAUD or lying. And (non-defensive) lying is of course the most basic form of attack-first theft, it's the (at least, attempted) theft of the truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, and vice-versa, lying (fraud) is a crime, and all lying hypocrites are criminals. They are also traitors to rationality and civilization - to every one and every thing. And treason is a sub-class of enmity; they are adversarial enemies of all mankind itself.

As hypocrites by definition ALWAYS refuse responsibility they can never be trusted to hold to any contractual agreements they make or sign onto. They are frauds and therefore traitors to rationality, civilization, and every one and every thing, actively subverting and undermining even otherwise mutually-beneficial, win/win situations for only personal gain, most likely by projecting their own fears of others doing same first! That is WHY they ALWAYS "project."

The word "Faith!" really only means "trust." When one pretends to trust in an imaginary bargain - one which was never specifically made - one is a fraud, unfaithful to the objective truth, just as one is a traitor when one chooses to betray a real "trust" or contract.

"Infidel" ("unfaithful") = TRAITOR. As a side note, since Muhammad pretended that everyone was born a muslim, he uses "infidel" to describe "traitors" - but "hypocrite" is just as accurate' as is "Adversary" and/or "ENEMY."

Their basic stance is their entirely fact-free and subjectively selfish double standards, pre-determined ritual substitute for rational fact-based logical thought and circumstantially situational cause-and-effect reasoning, that: no matter what the objective facts are (because life is too complex for anyone to ever be able to accurately determine same, if such things really even exist at all) they and their supporters are always righteous victims, entitled to everyone's pity; while everyone who dares to disagree with that lie is their wrongful oppressors, deserving of only angry scorn. Facts don't matter, only their stated feelings do, so everyone who disagrees with them must "prove a negative" - prove that they HAVEN'T hurt the hypocrites' feelings - or risk censure and punitive legal sanctions.

Furthermore, since the hypocrites alone are to be always presumed innocent until never proven guilty, silence means consent concerning their actions: they are entitled to do whatever they want, to whomever and whatever they want, wherever and whenever they want to do it.

In short, they alone have rights without responsibilities, while everyone else has no right to defend them selves from the hypocrites, but only the responsibility to become and remain their slaves. Obviously all criminals are hypocrites, and all hypocrites are criminals.

So politicians, especially globalists, are most accurately described "HYPOCRATS;" when not as "Traitors," "Adversaries," and "Enemies."

;-)

 - V -