THINKING ABOUT THINKING

THIS WON'T TEACH YOU WHAT TO THINK OR EVEN HOW TO THINK

IT WILL ONLY TEACH YOU ABOUT HOW YOU ALREADY THINK!

;-)

.......

THINKING ABOUT THINKING; MIND AND MORALITY; FEELINGS VS FACTS:

"Mental illness," false pride, and "sin" are all the exact same criminal choice - and circular reasoning the only excuse.

When one is paranoid - imagining or knowing that Yes, the universe IS out to get one - that one cannot escape the endless dharmic cycle of physical damage, pain, the memory of that pain (fear) and then the memory of the betrayal of one's own ultimately useless greed for less, and hope for no, pain-causing damage and fears - and that one's own realizing thoughts inflict the conceptualized and generalized memory of past specific pain-causing damages (aka 'fears' or "Fear") on one - then: one must also posit that, as one did not create one's self, nor the external universe, one's own thinking fears or fearfully fearsome thoughts are *not* merely internally-generated helplful warnings, but are also exernally-generated ancillary pains, to be 'bravely' fought ignored or avoided. Thus all people are naturally self-indulgent, self-pitying masochists, self-generating the additional pains of fears, and naturally hypocrites, too, because they - we all - cause their own masochistic pains while blaming others: "Waah! I'm such a helpless victim, and nothing's ever my fault because everyone and everything else is always out to get me!" Habitually avoiding blame by lying about it leads to atrophy of the brain. This process of extra-polating hyperbole (rationally taking the risk vs reward, carrot and stick, fear and hope, binary to its ultimate logical conclusion-ratio, of all-and-or-nothing) is the method behind all self-inflicted madness.

This literally albeit metaphorically "unhinged," "irrationality" is inescapable: as it is only a simple binary equation.

One can thus also naturally choose to see all of one's emotions as the one single feeling of externally-inflicted pain, and all dynamic thought "processes" leading inevitably to that one single static fear-contracted conclusion - after all, what separates us from mere robots and computers, what makes us "uniquely" conscious, if not our own emotional feelings?

Therefore, the self-inflicted hypocrisy - the double-standards where one demands pity for one's self, and anger at all who refuse one the pity, and in stead demand accountability for one's alleged free-will choices and onerous responsibilities over one's right to always be given the benefit of the doubt and be judged, if at all, innocent until never proven guilty, as if such things as causes and effects (if they even exist) are too complex to ever be understood by everyone else, too, and so, as we're all merely equally helpless fellow victims of unknowably mysterious (yet also somehow mysteriously known as "inevitable") outside forces beyond our comprehension or control, there are no real criminals nor crimes, as if every victim who seems to choose to attack thereby innocent others first, and those who do not, are somehow also morally equal.

Our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending!

But, despite that simple fact - that our emotions are merely simple re-presentations of the three most basic states of spacetime, and that everyone has them equally - even most animals - we can still, if we choose to, continue to pretend to be unique and uphold our personal feelings as the only real morality.

And yet ultimately the only true reality is that, even if the whole universe *is* always out to get one, and one resents even being forced to defend one's self, much less to also have to feel the pain of sadness for, pity, and defend innocent others, too: one must realize that these are universal truths and logic, and, as such, must apply to any and all others, as well - to the alleged gods or God, to one's enemies equally: even if and when they choose to ignore their own fallible pain-caused damages, their own fearful memories (aka thoughts) of same, by taking the time to always attack all others first, to not only keep one's enemies perpetually on the defensive, but also to distract them from their own failures - those failures still remain, and in order to be conscious at all, all such cyclical pains, fears, and greedy hopes - all such ultimately painful emotions - must always apply equally to them, too. Everything is ultimately hurt and dies, and so, ultimately, nobody is unique; there can be no pain and fear-free (consciousness-free, thought-negating and unconscious "Heaven") so the psycho-paths' literally thought-killing ultimate goals are false, as are the promises of all religions.

One cannot, through cowardice, prevent the additional pains of fears by causing the pain-causing damages one fears most - either by attacking others and daring them to destroy one, or by self-destructively self-sacrificing for the greater good.

Static safety does not exist, and dynamic reality will always conquer such illusions. Face reality; ignoring it will fail.
Nobody is perfectly safe and happy, although imagining them to be generates the illusory feelings of same within us all.
To masochistically pretend to altruistically, magnanimously, self-sacrifice for such an idealized idea (idol or eye-doll) is only another, equally valid way of negating the self, refusing to attack, as opposed to always attacking others first.

These choices (each equally selfish) are the difference between good (refraining from attack) and evil (always attacking).

;-)

PS: Thought-constricted psycho-paths have winnowed their own mental response options down to the two very most basic emotional binaries: to the Good/Bad rule: Whatever's subjectively considered good for them, is pretended to be objectively good for everyone else, too; and ditto, but vice-versa, for all things subjectively, temporarily considered to be "bad."

.......

 SHORTER VERSION:

When one is paranoid - imagining or knowing that Yes, the universe IS out to get one - then one's own realizing thoughts inflict the conceptualized and generalized memory of past specific pain-causing damages (aka 'fears' or "Fear") on one - and so there is no escape: one must posit that as one did not create one's self, nor the external universe, then one's own thinking fears are not merely internally-generated helplful warnings, but are also exernally generated ancillary pains, to be 'bravely' fought ignored or avoided. Thus all people are naturally masochists, self-generating the additional pains of fears, and naturally hypocrites, too, because they - we all - cause their own masochistic pains while blaming others.

One can thus also naturally choose to see all of one's emotions as the one single feeling of externally-inflicted pain, and all dynamic thought "processes" leading inevitably to that one single static fear-contracted conclusion - after all, what separates us from mere robots and computers, what makes us "uniquely" conscious, if not our own emotional feelings?

So despite that they are merely simple re-presentations of the three most basic states of spacetime, and that everyone has them equally - even most animals - we can pretend to be unique and hold our personal feelings as the only real morality.

;-)

.......

SHORT VERSION (AND GROUP OR GANG RIGHTS)

Paranoid masochism and the hypocrisy required to cover it up is what defines psychopathy: First, the paranoia: you falsely and slanderously assert that everyone else is always out to get you, which choice "makes" (lets) you feel like a helpless victim all the time (self-inflicted masochism) which then lets one create false, hypocritical scenarios of NOT-blaming others, as long as they agree to go along (with your criminal lies) to get along (with you, the extortive criminal) in agreeing that you're a perpetually helpless victim, "too." So as long as everyone else in your newly-formed victim-identity gang also agrees that everyone else in the gang is an equally-helpless fellow victim, they get to avoid being labelled as part of the oppressor group you can now all vilify and extort (as "intolerant hateful racist bigots," etc.)!

While all criminals are hypocrites and vice-versa, not all criminals are gangsters (but it's very unusual for them to not at least show a token support for one or more other criminal victimal gangs, as a sort of insurance excuse, just in case)!

====================="MOREOVER"=====================

MADE-UP, IMAGINARY PROBLEMS (FRAUDS) HAVE NO REAL SOLUTIONS EXCEPT TO ADMIT THEY'RE MADE-UP, IMAGINARY PROBLEMS (FRAUDS).

For instance, "poverty" is a relative, subjective term, not rooted in any factual, universally objective truth - so, since it can't ever really be defined, it also cannot ever really be "eradicated." Therefore, the ACTUAL LAW concerning the licensing of charities in Canada, openly states that one cannot be accredited if one promises to SOLVE THE PROBLEM. In this way, the Canadian "law" itself openly endorses and indeed enforces criminal "no money in solutions" negligence.

Now, naturally, one could posit that real poverty only exists when one cannot maintain a basic survival subsistence level, but then the victimology and hurt feelings industry gangs take over, demanding "dignity" and "respect" and all the other attendant subjective idolatry to be "equally" applied to all, too - basically demanding a criminal right to an equality of (externally inflicted inevitable force) outcome over an equality of (self-regulated free-will choice reliant) opportunity.

.......

Currently, the entire academic field of psychology is merely a myth and a fantasy. The premises on which it is based are entirely wrong, considering there has been no due diligence done to correctly categorize and define its most basic terms: emotions. There is a real underlying logical and reasonable method to the apparent madness, but none of the self-professed "expert authorities" who have conned governments into granting them their exclusive imprimaturs have bothered to look for it, not only because as usual their motto seems to be "There's No Money In Solutions," but also, and because of their own arrogance, they haven't even been able to consider that they have been so negligent as to have missed something so basic.

...


People who are too cowardly to face, identify, and oppose the real threat always end up "failing upwards" simply because "there's no money in solutions!"

Conclusion:

Evading fear increases parasitism and corrupts society.

To put it in more complex, "academic" terms:

When one wants pleasure without pain and fear, and rights to same without the responsibility for having earned them, one must oppose and ignore cause and effect. Ignoring cause and effect means refusing to perceive and detect dynamic actions, in favour of static pre-conceptions. It means killing thoughts to favour pre-conceived, pre-judiced biases ("psycopathy").o choose such excuse-making images over reality, such subjectively opinionated empty forms and formalities over any and all substantive universally objective rationality, reasons and facts, is what defines the literally pathological idolater. It's a process of wishful, magical thinking, and it usually relies on trying to force reality to bend to the fantasy, and as such engages in an increasing scale of group-might-made rights practices as manipulation/coercion/extortion/terrorism. The final failed fascist fantasy is always that force (including government force) can be used to change inconvenient facts - that people can vote to change the truth into their favourite lies - which, again, is always that they can have rights to pleasure without having to deal with any painful responsibilities of having to pay for or otherwise earn it; equality of outcome over equality of opportunity.

To put it in less complex, non-academic terms:

All excuse-making criminals are cowards.

"Psychotic, paranoid masochist hypocrites" always project: "I couldn't be responsible to myself or anyone else, because I was afraid - and I alone feel fear! (OK, if and when you're willing to indulge my excuse, you can share in it: "we all do it, too!") Whee!"

Even putting this cowardice into "psychological" (mental illness) terms, is to give in to one of their favorite excuses:

"I didn't do it! My brain made me do it! And in fact, I didn't do it at all! Only my brain did it! Whee!"

Therefore it's plain to see that all thought-killing, emotional-excuse-making, fear-focused cowardly criminal "psychotics" (aka "paranoid" "masochists" and "conflicted, cognitively dissonant, bi-polar manic-depressive hypocrites") are cowards.

;-(

The very dictionary definition of "Psycho-paths" is simply "thought-killers." It's not something only a trained expert medical authority can diagnose and therapeutically treat but never cure (because to such criminal negligents, the motto is always "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - Again!")! Anyone who can do it easily understands it.

All psychopaths are masochists and all masochists are psychopaths. Masochists aren't brave pain-lovers at all - they are cowards who only inflict pain on themselves to cancel what they consider as the additional pains called fears or "Fear."

But one's thoughts prioritize fears, not, as these psychotic masochists or masochistically psychotics choose to see them, as externally-generated inflictions of additional pains, but as internally-generated helpful warnings, to be heeded and used to avoid future pain-causing damage.

Their chosen view is simply one of permanent fear aka "paranoia." And since one's thoughts prioritize fear in order to earn hope, what these people who choose, in stead, to fear not the causes of their fears, but "only" the fear itself, are really trying to do is to kill off their thoughts.

Pretending it's smart to kill off one's thoughts is the most basic and blatant example of sheerest hypocrisy, yet that - and only that - is what every delinquent criminally negligent libertine "liberal" does all the time anyway: "Whee."

Even worse: "fascism" (communazi totalitarianism, collectivist conformity, i.e: total control aka slavery) always automatically results from group-might-made-rights to be pitied instead of scorned: in pretending they can't control them selves, excuse-making criminals must also "logically" insist that, ("since we, i.e: you, all do it, too") as nobody else can control them selves either, then they ("we") all must be controlled by other people (i.e: by "me")!

So, by pretending they can't control them selves, they also pretend they "must" try to control everyone else instead! In public, they always endorse useless pity over useful anger because it's less risky. But give them a large enough gang to dilute their own culpability and risk, while increasing their power to extort, and they will also advocate for anger at those who would be angry at such criminals for committing their crimes.

See "islam" for the "best" example of this.