Politics is binary, and reflects the exact same "cultural" divisions in science and biological nature: destructive predatory aggressive cannibal parasites vs helpful collaborative and cooperative symbiotes; destruction vs construction.
Libertine "liberal" politicians always seek to divide and conquer with fear: they scare their prospective intended victims by telling them they are being attacked on the basis of innate group membership attributes or symptoms beyond their control - in order to divide them from the body politic as a whole, cut them off from the real collective herd, and enslave them as their perpetual voting blocs of "marginalized racialized and/or sexualized communities."
And, without ever providing any evidence, they blame the local majority, which has no real leaders because it is not visibly oppressed (invisibly oppressed BY the liberals, of course, but they never seem to notice because they remain the majority) which in the West is of course whites and more specifically, males (because they can easily convince the white females they are victims, too). And it all seems believable when they say all white people are anti-non-white racists, because they them selves speak from direct personal "lived experience:" all guilty white male liberals ARE secret closeted racists, forever trying to expiate their guilt for being smart enough to notice that the others are inferior, while those others are more openly racists.
So they tell each group (the muslim community, the indigenous community, the female community, the black community, etc) that they are all perpetual victims, and only the liberals care about them all enough to want to pay them reparations in FREE STUFF, while those mean nasty stingy bean-counting conservatives don't care about ANY of their marginalized racialized sexualized groups at all! And the more the merrier: each further division (for instance, "gay black females") gets a separate label and permanent placemat at the public tax trough, which divisions they call "diversity" and "intersectionality."
THEY REALLY ONLY LITERALLY BUY VOTES BY BRIBING SHORT-SIGHTED GREEDY AND LAZY PEOPLE WITH THEIR OWN MONEY, AND IT WORKS, EACH AND EVERY TIME.
Conservatives, on the other hand, agree with the liberals that they don't care about any group identity gang affiliations, as they only want to treat each and every individual citizen in the exact same and equal way, by affording them the exact same rights and responsibilities, where none of their incidental symptoms (race, sex, place of origin, superstitions, etc) matter.
Therefore, the majority of the time in any democratic partisan ("party") group system, the liberals' fear-mongering victimology tactics will succeed by herding most if not all individuals into their group identity divisions to vote for free reparations and protection from the hypothetically oppressive majority (currently presumed to be of white male racists) and conservatives will almost always lose the elections.
Since the liberals, as criminals, regard the government not as an insurance company (which only pays out to those in need on a case-by-case, temporary basis, and which is ruled by statistically sound actuarial data neutral and soberly administered by those with no personal interests in the outcomes, as conservatives do) but as a perpetually paying pension pyramid, where expenditures always exceed income, and their job is to facilitate the "redistribution of wealth" (theft from the temporarily rich to their habitually poor oppressed marginalized extortion blocs of racialized and sexualized minority group pets) as Robin-Hood-like "deliverologists," they can be guaranteed to spend and tax us into oblivion each and every time, by running up massive unpayable debts on Chinese credit cards in our names and the names of our children and as-yet unborn grandchildren.
Each and every time. And they aren't shy about it, either: openly proclaiming these very same, criminally negligent intentions in their election policy literature and flyers time after time.
And it's all based on their individual choices to party for today because they have no faith in a tomorrow which may never come - while disregarding the obvious truth that the only guaranteed way to create wealth (or anything) is to actually do it, not merely hope it might happen when someone else might eventually get around to doing it sometime, somewhere else.
Their chosen stance of hypocritically butthurt victimology literally atrophies their brains and keeps them infantilized.
...
Hypocrites are "schizophrenic psychopaths" (split-skull thought-killers) who are literally so scared that their brains are stuck in DENIAL - of the three dynamic progressing stages of both emotion and thought (fear, greed, and hope) they are stuck at hope, which even they refer to as a choice (as in "Screw you - I MEANT to do that!") to be "cynical," "shrewd" and "realistic."
The two higher functions (negotiating greed and passive hope) which rely on intelligence in order to multi-task, get atrophied from a habitual lack of use.
When confronted by fear (anything they find BAD on the initial shallow binary, "Good/Bad" rule assessment scale) they instantly DENY their fear, and in stead put on a big virtue-signaling show of how much they masochistically love and embrace the idea of suicide.
When confronted by anything they don't fear, they will pretend to be tough and shrewd by instantly heaping scorn onto it and onto the people presenting it.
Unless the proposition is as direct as giving them money, by clearly indicating same ("You have just won the lottery!") they can be almost guaranteed to put up a fight and contentiously describe any idea they can't take immediate credit for as "controversial" at the very least.
Couple these obvious habits with the hypocrites' usual victim-blaming projections of their own real subjective standards and "values" of paranoid masochism (which rely on the static assertion that they are always right, and victims, while everyone else is always their wrongful oppressors, such that they alone deserve, in reparations for a myriad of generalized past offenses too many to remember or detail, to have only rights to others' persons and properties without any responsibilities to have to earn or otherwise pay for them, while everyone else has no right to resist or defend them selves, but only the responsibility to become and remain the hypocrites' duly-extorted slaves) which, never being based on any real, dynamic, cause-and-effect facts or truth, will of course never make any objective sense, and it becomes plain and clear as to why they always seem retarded (or libtarded, leftarded, etc) to everyone else. Double standards always seem insane, but in fact also always began as logical risk-vs-reward assessments, and the deliberate free-will choices needed to prove criminal intent.
In short, the intentionally chosen decision to become and remain habitual criminals causes actual brain-damaged stupidity.
The idealized image of "THE EVIL GENIUS" is a false idol which bored and frustrated rule-constrained libertines often fall for, but liberal politicians will continue to succeed and "fail upwards" anyway, as long as people (especially each new and ever-larger cohort of young voters) feels so habitually insecure that they feel comfortable having everything promised to them by a paternalistic government as a guaranteed and continuing extension of their childhood dependency habits.
Conservatives simply CAN NOT WIN ELECTIONS by relying on only the carrot ("We'll reduce taxes and save you money!") to convince non-working voters, while ignoring the use of the stick (hammering home the above truth) to force the kids to realize that they aren't being righteously helped to their greedy and stingy parents' wealth by their recognizably infantile libertine liberal "radical revolutionary" (criminal) politician "friends" at all, but are being robbed by those same fiends of their inheritance.
That carrot-only approach can only convince a few of their working "Maker" supporters, while convincing exactly ZERO Takers.
Liberals say "We'll give you $2 in "YAY FREE STUFF!" now, if you vote for us (with fine print saying "You owe us $20 forever").
It's like the kids just won a guaranteed fortune on a game show, but for no reason decided to play it safe and settle for 10%.
The only way to guarantee a future, is to work for it; but liberals insist it's everyone's right to extort it in reparations from others, or at least borrow it. But exactly who, then, are those others, really? Socialism is great until it runs out of the money it steals and extorts from other people.
And the end goal of socialism is communism, where everyone is also treated "equally:" everyone has the same guaranteed equality of outcome: non-working poverty coupled with permanent slaves working forever to pay off their masters' excesses and debts.
Conservatives want to treat everyone equally, guaranteeing them the same equality of opportunities: the exact same rights and responsibilities; while liberals promise them rights without responsibilities, which end up as responsibilities without rights.
