Trump cannot be anti-globalist while working with global elites
By Brandon Smith
From Bob Livingstone's Personal Liberty Alerts
In the summer of 2016 during the election campaign I examined the
Trump phenomenon and how it relates to the globalist narrative. I
concluded that Trump would be president based on the fact that having a
(supposedly) hardcore nationalist and populist conservative in the White
House over the next four years would actually be highly beneficial to
the elites. At the time the Federal Reserve was getting ready to tighten
liquidity, which would inevitably lead to market volatility and a crash
in fundamentals. By the end of Trump's first term,
or perhaps at the beginning of his second term, the recessionary crisis
would become obvious to the general public. Trump, and all
conservatives, would be blamed for the resulting disaster that the
banking elites engineered.
During the election it was unclear if Donald Trump was a puppet of the elites. He could have simply been a convenient scapegoat. Today, it is obvious that he is indeed controlled opposition.
As I've noted in numerous articles, Trump's associations with the globalists go way back. He was saved from crippling debts in multiple properties in Atlantic City during the 1990s by the Rothschilds. The Rothschild banking agent that handled Trump's bailout was none other than Wilber Ross, the senior managing director of Rothschild New York. Ross is now Trump's Commerce Secretary, which indicates that this relationship continues to this day.
During the election it was unclear if Donald Trump was a puppet of the elites. He could have simply been a convenient scapegoat. Today, it is obvious that he is indeed controlled opposition.
As I've noted in numerous articles, Trump's associations with the globalists go way back. He was saved from crippling debts in multiple properties in Atlantic City during the 1990s by the Rothschilds. The Rothschild banking agent that handled Trump's bailout was none other than Wilber Ross, the senior managing director of Rothschild New York. Ross is now Trump's Commerce Secretary, which indicates that this relationship continues to this day.
In 2016 Trump offered positions in the White House to a vast array of
global elitists, some of them from the Council on Foreign Relations, a
think tank whose stated goals include the erasure of borders and the end
of national sovereignty. These members include:
During the campaign, Trump consistently (and rightly) criticized Hillary Clinton's many ties to the banking cabal, including her close relationship with internationalist banks like Goldman Sachs. He also railed against globalism and argued that the economic recovery under Obama was actually a massive financial bubble — the markets were artificially propped up by the Federal Reserve's stimulus and low interest rates, and indicators like unemployment stats were rigged.
Yet, after his election Trump proceeded to saturate his cabinet with the same banking elites he once attacked, and then he took full credit for the markets and the fake employment and GDP numbers only months later.
Once in office, Trump suddenly abandoned his promise to indict the Clintons, and any pursuit of fighting the globalists fell by the wayside.
Instead, Trump turned all his attention on China, feeding into the false East/West paradigm and opening the door to an economic world war as a useful distraction for the globalists while they continued to pull the plug on economic life support.
If Trump was going to do battle with the globalist establishment, why would he surround himself with so many elites and why would he hold up China as a primary threat instead of global banking institutions?
We still hear Trump talk about how the Federal Reserve is run by ignorant people, and how the "future belongs to patriots, not globalists," but Trump's hyperfocus on the market bubble and the trade war with China do nothing to combat the globalist agenda. In fact, these actions help the globalists immensely.
This bizarre behavior vindicates my deepest suspicions during the election — Trump is not just an unwitting scapegoat, he is a participant in the game, playing the theatrical role of the bumbling villain.
In the script, he is the anti-globalist who trips over his own hubris and causes the downfall of the most powerful empire in the history of the world. He is playing the conservative that proves once and for all why conservative philosophy is "evil" and why the leftists were right all along. Part of his job is to co-opt the liberty movement, redirect its energies into pointless pursuits, and to make us look ridiculous or dangerous by the end of his presidency.
However, there is a bit of a conundrum forming for the elites.
Trump's true nature is slowly being revealed, such as when he openly supports Red Flag gun laws designed to usurp gun rights through back door confiscation.
Or, when he commits to a military buildup by sending troops to Saudi Arabia in an obvious first step toward war with Iran.
This is causing many conservatives in the liberty movement to question Trump's loyalties (as they should). The elites have to keep conservatives and liberty activists blindly riding the Trump train for as long as possible, for if we begin to question the narrative too soon, it becomes harder for them to draw us into supporting actions which will be blamed for the growing economic and geopolitical crisis.
It is vital that liberty activists understand that Trump is a psyop aimed specifically at them. As the leftist media outlet Bloomberg once happily predicted in an editorial titled 'The Tea Party Meets Its Maker', Trump could absorb conservative movements (those they called the "Tea Party") and destroy them once and for all.
Recent events and Trump's rhetoric are carefully staged to make him appear anti-globalist, and the aggressive nature of this propaganda was predictable. The elites have to draw conservatives back in somehow, and so they are throwing as many crumbs as they can from the Trump table without him actually accomplishing anything in our favor.
Getting rid of John Bolton was the beginning, as Bolton represented a hated element among many liberty activists and the establishment had no choice but to finally reduce his footprint in the White House. However, this was too little too late, as many conservatives are already well aware of the various elites permeating Trump's cabinet. He would have to get rid of all of them in order to impress us.
And so, the elites moved on to phase two...
The latest Ukrainian scandal and the potential impeachment of Trump is a perfect example of globalist reverse psychology. The impeachment will likely go nowhere, just as Russiagate went nowhere, but it will indeed pull many conservatives back onto the Trump train as they assume the establishment is "out to get him" even though he is working directly with them.
The Ukraine scandal will blow back on Joe Biden, removing him from the Democratic field running for president and leaving the door open for either Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. I continue to predict, as I did in July, that Elizabeth Warren will be the Democratic candidate in 2020.
The sudden reopening of discussion on the Clinton emails will lead some liberty activists to assume that maybe, this time, Trump is going to follow through on his claim that he would investigate and prosecute the Clintons.
I say it though I think many reading this know, Trump is not going to touch the Clintons. But he will pretend he is looking into the matter if it helps lure conservatives back into the false narrative.
Trump's U.N. speech in which he criticized globalism was perhaps the most blatant attempt to sucker conservatives into thinking maybe Trump is indeed "playing 4D chess."
He's not.
Rather, Trump is playing the role he has always played, just as he played a role on WWE Wrestling, or his role in The Apprentice; it is Trump's job to attack the globalists, and it is their job to pretend to attack him.
All the while the real targets of attack are conservatives, sovereignty activists and freedom advocates.
The purpose of this facade, this fake wrestling match between Trump and the elites?
To get conservatives invested in a false paradigm, to co-opt our movement and our momentum, and ultimately to chain us to Trump's reputation and then drown us when he goes down.
While activists wait around for Trump to take action against the globalists, they sit idle accomplishing very little.
While activists put all their hopes in Trump as a solution to the globalist problem, they remain unprepared for the fallout.
The masterstroke of the elites using Trump as a weapon, is that it means one man is able to nullify the activism of millions.
To truth and knowledge,
Brandon Smith
- Elaine Chao, United States Secretary of Transportation
- Jamie Dimon, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum
- Jim Donovan, Deputy Treasury Secretary
- Larry Fink, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum
- Neil M. Gorsuch, Supreme Court Justice
- Vice Admiral Robert S. Harward, National Security Advisor (declined appointment)
During the campaign, Trump consistently (and rightly) criticized Hillary Clinton's many ties to the banking cabal, including her close relationship with internationalist banks like Goldman Sachs. He also railed against globalism and argued that the economic recovery under Obama was actually a massive financial bubble — the markets were artificially propped up by the Federal Reserve's stimulus and low interest rates, and indicators like unemployment stats were rigged.
Yet, after his election Trump proceeded to saturate his cabinet with the same banking elites he once attacked, and then he took full credit for the markets and the fake employment and GDP numbers only months later.
Once in office, Trump suddenly abandoned his promise to indict the Clintons, and any pursuit of fighting the globalists fell by the wayside.
Instead, Trump turned all his attention on China, feeding into the false East/West paradigm and opening the door to an economic world war as a useful distraction for the globalists while they continued to pull the plug on economic life support.
If Trump was going to do battle with the globalist establishment, why would he surround himself with so many elites and why would he hold up China as a primary threat instead of global banking institutions?
We still hear Trump talk about how the Federal Reserve is run by ignorant people, and how the "future belongs to patriots, not globalists," but Trump's hyperfocus on the market bubble and the trade war with China do nothing to combat the globalist agenda. In fact, these actions help the globalists immensely.
This bizarre behavior vindicates my deepest suspicions during the election — Trump is not just an unwitting scapegoat, he is a participant in the game, playing the theatrical role of the bumbling villain.
In the script, he is the anti-globalist who trips over his own hubris and causes the downfall of the most powerful empire in the history of the world. He is playing the conservative that proves once and for all why conservative philosophy is "evil" and why the leftists were right all along. Part of his job is to co-opt the liberty movement, redirect its energies into pointless pursuits, and to make us look ridiculous or dangerous by the end of his presidency.
However, there is a bit of a conundrum forming for the elites.
Trump's true nature is slowly being revealed, such as when he openly supports Red Flag gun laws designed to usurp gun rights through back door confiscation.
Or, when he commits to a military buildup by sending troops to Saudi Arabia in an obvious first step toward war with Iran.
This is causing many conservatives in the liberty movement to question Trump's loyalties (as they should). The elites have to keep conservatives and liberty activists blindly riding the Trump train for as long as possible, for if we begin to question the narrative too soon, it becomes harder for them to draw us into supporting actions which will be blamed for the growing economic and geopolitical crisis.
It is vital that liberty activists understand that Trump is a psyop aimed specifically at them. As the leftist media outlet Bloomberg once happily predicted in an editorial titled 'The Tea Party Meets Its Maker', Trump could absorb conservative movements (those they called the "Tea Party") and destroy them once and for all.
Recent events and Trump's rhetoric are carefully staged to make him appear anti-globalist, and the aggressive nature of this propaganda was predictable. The elites have to draw conservatives back in somehow, and so they are throwing as many crumbs as they can from the Trump table without him actually accomplishing anything in our favor.
Getting rid of John Bolton was the beginning, as Bolton represented a hated element among many liberty activists and the establishment had no choice but to finally reduce his footprint in the White House. However, this was too little too late, as many conservatives are already well aware of the various elites permeating Trump's cabinet. He would have to get rid of all of them in order to impress us.
And so, the elites moved on to phase two...
The latest Ukrainian scandal and the potential impeachment of Trump is a perfect example of globalist reverse psychology. The impeachment will likely go nowhere, just as Russiagate went nowhere, but it will indeed pull many conservatives back onto the Trump train as they assume the establishment is "out to get him" even though he is working directly with them.
The Ukraine scandal will blow back on Joe Biden, removing him from the Democratic field running for president and leaving the door open for either Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. I continue to predict, as I did in July, that Elizabeth Warren will be the Democratic candidate in 2020.
The sudden reopening of discussion on the Clinton emails will lead some liberty activists to assume that maybe, this time, Trump is going to follow through on his claim that he would investigate and prosecute the Clintons.
I say it though I think many reading this know, Trump is not going to touch the Clintons. But he will pretend he is looking into the matter if it helps lure conservatives back into the false narrative.
Trump's U.N. speech in which he criticized globalism was perhaps the most blatant attempt to sucker conservatives into thinking maybe Trump is indeed "playing 4D chess."
He's not.
Rather, Trump is playing the role he has always played, just as he played a role on WWE Wrestling, or his role in The Apprentice; it is Trump's job to attack the globalists, and it is their job to pretend to attack him.
All the while the real targets of attack are conservatives, sovereignty activists and freedom advocates.
The purpose of this facade, this fake wrestling match between Trump and the elites?
To get conservatives invested in a false paradigm, to co-opt our movement and our momentum, and ultimately to chain us to Trump's reputation and then drown us when he goes down.
While activists wait around for Trump to take action against the globalists, they sit idle accomplishing very little.
While activists put all their hopes in Trump as a solution to the globalist problem, they remain unprepared for the fallout.
The masterstroke of the elites using Trump as a weapon, is that it means one man is able to nullify the activism of millions.
To truth and knowledge,
Brandon Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment