Saturday, August 11, 2018

"Alt-Right" vs. "(((The Jews)))!"? Both Are Victims of THE WHITE CURSE!

Geneticists classify Jews (and their inbred Arab cousins) as Caucasians. Even if some of them are still so paranoid (or maybe even most of them, especially because of their allegedly higher intelligence) that they circle the wagons in a predictable, “My Team (Tribe), Right OR Wrong!” manner, it’s no different from any other group or gang mentality, including yours, "Alt-Righter/neo-Nazis!"
Even the most powerful Jews (the banksters) don’t actually take sides – they fund and exploit all sides in any given conflict (the Rothschilds financed Hitler, after all).
How can some of the better ones be Conservatives and rabidly support Capitalism and free enterprise (like Michael Savage and David Horowitz) and thus play into the “greedy interest-charging Jew” stereotype, while so many if not most others support Communism?!
And Yes, I am aware that certain small “Alt-Right” and self-described “neo-Nazi” types like Christopher Cantwell have been effectively de-platformed and cut off from Jewish-owned censorship-prone payment processing companies.
Either way, Jews are just as stupid (or even more so, due to their affliction of high intelligence) as anyone else – and so it always backfires against them. As the common saying goes, “The Jews are their own worst enemies!”
Further, the Jews suffer from the same White Curse as the rest of us do!
Let’s define terms: Intelligence is speed of thought and memory. Smarts or wisdom is how one uses that intelligence (hint: honesty is the best policy, and deliberately self-inflicted paranoia leads to all other, ultimately stupid, “mental illnesses”).
The White Curse is that increased intelligence leads to a certain type of stupidity denied to the less intelligent breeds: the one and only real drawback of White intelligence is that the ability to see so far into the future leads some of the more weak-minded ones (“liberals”) to see all the potential problems as inevitable, and so they become paranoid masochists who hypocritically pretend to instantly compromise with and Submit to (and actually cause or induce others to cause) those very same problems which cause those pains they fear the most! That way, they can pretend to ‘control’ and cancel the additional pains caused by fearing them!
Notice how all the destructive self-hating “liberals” are whites/Jews! No other breeds on earth act that way!
It takes a certain level of intelligence to be that stupid!


PS: If anyone is offended by "RACISM," they should realize that "Racism" is indeed simply a combination of both genetics (Nature) and indoctrination (Nurture).

It's both a natural expression of like marrying like, with the Asians being the biggest "racists"  (and the Whites being the lest "racist!") by that measurement, and also the result, on the other hand, of our free-will right to freedom of association. 

Without an inherent, genetic predisposition to "racism," no "races" - not even the poor oppressed victimal "People Of Color" ones so favored by the Left - would be able to have existed at all, ever!

Leftist gangsters want to nullify both our genetic predispositions and our intellectual rights to make free-will choices for ourselves - they are, as always, all about control (aka SLAVERY)!

Communists are gangster slavers; ditto for "Socialists" "Nazis" and libertine "liberal" criminals in general, including "Muslims:" - all so called "Totalitarians" are always all about total control of other people - aka SLAVERY.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

How Feminine Wiles Became Feminist Lies

Preface: EXTORTION 101:

Note: This will only work on more intelligent (paranoid/guilt-prone) people; aka on straight white males.

"Victimality:" is to always play the victim, to perpetually slander and extort the alleged "oppressors."
The best (least risk, most rewarding) way is to blame the largest leaderless group: straight white males.

The best way to do that, is to pretend to "champion" gays, non-whites, and females, as victims of same.

Also note: Governments in general defuse men's naturally constructive hopeful anger with guilty pity.

So governments act as women, in that they are parasitical gangster takers extorting makers by inducing them into deferring their own rights and responsibilities to think for themselves to them as expert authority.

Governments are the largest gangs of criminal victimals: "You are victims and need us to run your lives."

And if you're not a good and loyal fellow victim gang-member, then you're a potential criminal oppressor.

Governments enslave people by knowing that the best way to undermine others (sell me high to buy you low) is to convince them their anger is bad and pity is good for everyone: that they are all helpless victims.


Women Are Victimals 101:

Women are prone to pity simply in order to not angrily destroy their offspring before they can grow up.

Also, their not being prone to anger prevents them from being destroyed for physically challenging men.

This also leaves women open to pitying criminals and the enemies of their own tribes as fellow victims.

Women are naturally subjectivist hypocrites, aka criminals (hence Muhammad's "more women in Hell" meme).

How Feminine Wiles Became Feminist Lies:

Women are natural communist gangsters. Feminism is really a form of slanderous victimality aka extortion.

Feminism is a divisive, anti-human sexist lie. There is no "Patriarchy" of men conspiring to oppress and control women because they fear their intelligence. Women made that slander up to blame men for their own failings. Men simply do not regard women in terms of their intelligence AT ALL. Men objectify women and instinctively want to protect women, and only want to "control" them in the exact same way that women want to control small children: by hugging them close and not letting them wander off into danger. Men also see women as sex objects, and want to "sequester" their women to keep them safe from all other men.

This is a natural biological instinct, evolved over time to preserve and continue one's own genes alone.

Women are natural liars, as they know that there is no conspirational "Patriarchy" and that, on the exact contrary, men will always instinctively want to defend and protect women, and so the women then always act like helpless victims in order to exploit that interest and to get laid; (the "damsel in distress" act or syndrome) men always fall for it, and women know that men always fall for it. Fraud is a crime.

Women are naturally hypocritical slanderous extortive victimals, all about the double standards: they all seem to want to be seen as weak when it suits them, but also strong when being weak no longer suits them.

(Men, on the other hand, always have to be seen as strong - unless being "sensitive" can get them laid)!

Either way, the goal is to increase their rights and dilute their personal responsibilities by offloading their responsibilities onto men, while denying the men their self-defense rights, thus enslaving the men.

Women will offer sympathy (pity) for everyone, and also demand pity: but only for them selves. Otherwise, they want their men to be dedicated only to them, and usefully angry at every one and every thing else.

But in always virtue-signalling pity for everyone, to build themselves up as caring sharing altruistic and magnanimous, they implicitly slander-shame their own men as potential oppressors for resisting it.

This is both how and why women will undermine their own men in order to keep their other options open.

When women feel too safe, they will want to preserve and continue their own genes alone, by increasing their own offspring's viability by having sex with different men, while remaining safe. So in order to justify wanting to ditch their current boyfriends to have guilt-free monkey sex, women will complain about how their boyfriends are misogynistic members of the oppressive male chauvenist patriarchy, usually to their husbands' or boyfriends' best friends, who, being guys, will always agree with them to get laid.

There is no way any man would ever band together with any other man to protect his own woman, much less to oppressively protect someone else's girlfriend. On the contrary, almost ALL men will go along with women's lies about how all men are misogynists, ("Except for ME, of course!") and they will also all pretend to admit that "The Patriarchy" is real, and will even gladly call themselves "Male Feminists" in order to play the "White Knight" meme, to then claim their reward from the grateful damsel, and get laid.

This is only basic monkey biology. Feminism is societal cancer: anti-human misandristic slander and extortion. It's a simple predictable behavior pattern showing what every individual does, but due to the nature of self-serving oppressive and enslaving government, has recently been actually enshrined in our laws as a mandatory virtue, and is falsely actually blamed on - and therefore also endorses as the antidote to a problem which has never really existed - group force. As usual, the government motto is "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - AGAIN!" Hence the "Feminist" victimality extortion industry has now reached critical mass in the West, with the preposterous "#MeToo" movement.

This is why the legal system discriminates 90% in favour of women and against men in all divorce cases:

Since men are larger stronger and smarter than women, "of course!" the evil male used undue influence to trick the helpless damsels-in-distress, and so all the lawyers and judges of both sexes must defend them!

This is the brutal truth of the real-world systemic government-enforced sexism which exists these days - not the literally preposterous exact opposite lying slanderous extortion meme of "feminist victimology!"


Even Muhammad knew women are more naturally evil than men! Because of the size and strength difference, they are more conniving, manipulative, deceptive nasty slanderous and sneakier than honest men! That's why "feminism" (the female point of view made mandatory in law) is societal cancer!

Feminism was invented by "Fast" Eddie Bernays, - Sigmund Fraud's nephew and author of the book "PROPAGANDA" to incite women into thinking men had been historically enslaving them - in order to enslave both sexes by giving corporations another easy source of labor while simultaneously cutting everyone's wages in half, by inducing women to join the workforce. This short-sighted but immediately lucrative "wimmins' rights" scam led to women dying of cancer as they became "equal" to men by taking up such bad habits as smoking and drinking, while it also led to a massive decrease in Western birthrates and the "need" to import a slave class of foreigners (these days, mostly muslims) which again managed to double the labor force while cutting the average wage in half. The muslims' women won't be feminists, but will help the globalist corporations' new slave class work force to increase in size at the literally direct expense of the allegedly smarter whites they are replacing. "Feminism" was the first wedge issue that led to all other forms of divisive identity politics (racial/Black Lives Matter racism, and sexual - gay and trans and WTF else) to finish us off. It led to all forms of "reverse" discrimination legislation which further destroyed every individual's basic equal human rights (especially those of straight white males) in favor of group rights and directly led to the creation of the roaming packs of corporate extortion armies of petulently infantile "Social Justice Warriors."


These short-sighted destructively pathological criminals are all, by definition, traitors to all sovereign nations and their people. Salesmen will trade away everything - even their own futures - for the idol of money and the power of slavery it represents.

So, as to the common: "Why bring in people who cannot assimilate and have violence in their DNA?" question ...

The obvious answer must be: "Er ... maybe: "Because banksters exist for "creative destruction!"?

They always finance both sides in all conflicts, (remember how the Jewish Rothschild banksters even financed Hitler himself?!) so that when they're over, (and even during them) the loser owes the winners AND the banksters, and the winners owe them, too!

So all conflicts are win/win for them, and lose/lose for us!

But when there's no conflict, there's no fast lucrative turnovers either!

So conflict is good for banksters, and stability sucks for them.

Therefore banksters will always attack first, foment sedition and destruction in order to prophit from it.

Conclusion: All banksters are by definition criminals.

Further, when they loan you money, it's fake, "fiat" money - aka counterfeit! But when you pay them back, it's in collateral on real property which you literally slaved away to work to buy for them.

Conclusion: All Banksters are slavers.

Note: Our alleged Globalist Corporate Bankster masters, aka (((The Jews))), suffer from the exact same White Curse the rest of us do! (Caveat: Obviously, not all Jews are banksters, and definitely not all banksters are Jewish, either! In fact, by far, most banksters are not Jewish - for instance, there's plenty of banksters in China, obviously - but the Jewish proclivity for in-group nepotism and hiring their own brethren when they're onto a "good thing" as usual condemns them to be as disproportionately represented in global finance as they are in all other top job spots - thus inviting the preposterous trope that they are and always were actively the ones behind whatever goes wrong in the world)!

Let's define terms: Intelligence is speed of thought and memory. Smarts or wisdom is how one uses that intelligence (hint: honesty is the best policy, and deliberately self-inflicted paranoia leads to all other ultimately stupid "mental illnesses").

The White Curse is that increased intelligence leads to a certain type of stupidity denied to the less intelligent breeds: the one and only real drawback of White intelligence is that the ability to see so far into the future leads some of the more weak-minded ones ("liberals") to see all the potential problems as inevitable, and so they become paranoid masochists who hypocritically pretend to instantly compromise with and Submit to (and actually cause or induce others to cause) those very same problems which cause those pains they fear the most! That way, they can pretend to 'control' and cancel the additional pains caused by fearing them! Notice how all the destructive self-hating "liberals" are whites/Jews! No other breeds on earth act that way!

As usual, the Jews are their own worst enemies; none of this "creative destruction" will end well, neither for them nor all mankind.

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Facebook Tries to Access Users' Financial History

With their recent history of data manipulation leaks, how long before FASCBOOK crashes the stock market, too?!

From here and here:

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Facebook has approached multiple large banks to access their customers' financial data, such as card transactions and checking account balances, to "deepen user engagement" -- a claim the social media platform now says isn't true.

According to the report, Facebook has been in contact with JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and U.S. Bancorp to try and get users' financial data. The social media company says it's so that they can show you your checking balance in the Facebook Messenger app, allow you to contact your bank in Messenger as a customer service tool, and attempt to develop fraud alert software.

Facebook maintained these discussions were completely centered around the Messenger app, and that data received from the banks would not be sold to third parties for advertisements.

“We don’t use purchase data from banks or credit card companies for ads,” said spokeswoman Elisabeth Diana. “We also don’t have special relationships, partnerships, or contracts with banks or credit-card companies to use their customers’ purchase data for ads.”

However, Facebook denies that they are actively trying to access users' purchasing history.

"A recent Wall Street Journal story implies incorrectly that we are actively asking financial services companies for financial transaction data -- this is not true," a Facebook spokesperson told CNNMoney. "Like many online companies with commerce businesses, we partner with banks and credit card companies to offer services like customer chat or account management."
Several of the aforementioned banks have also said they are not disclosing their customer’s banking information.

"We don't share our customers' off-platform transaction data with these platforms and have had to say 'No' to some things as a result," said JPMorgan Chase spokeswoman Patricia Wexler.

"While we regularly have conversations about potential partnerships, safeguarding the security and privacy of our customers' data and providing customer choice are paramount in everything we do," Citigroup told AFP.

Facebook is allegedly trying to compete with other online monetary systems like PayPal and Venmo, especially since the rise in use of the Facebook Marketplace system.

Thursday, July 26, 2018

"Mental Illness" Is Really Only a Criminal, Habitual CHOICE!

Here’s what’s (always!) really going on, at any and all levels of human interactions, be they individual, familial, clannish, tribal, national, state, empire and even at the global level:

Criminality comprises and contains these 4 intertwined habitual choices aka “mental illness syndromes:”

Psychopathy – Literally really only the Greek words for “thought killing:” planning one’s responses due to
Paranoia – The idea that everyone’s out to get one – makes one give in to being outnumbered as inevitable;
Masochism – The cowardly cancellation of half the threatened pain, known as fear, by Submitting to it via
Hypocrisy – The attempt to pre-empt danger by pretending to instantly SUBMIT to all criminal extortions.

And all of these are really only pretend aspects of the same thing: slanderously extortive “Paranoia!” but while most people have sussed out that life is full of pain-causing damage, the remembered fear of those pains (which is also another form of pain) and the sneaky and ultimately useless greed for less and hope of no pain, followed by the ultimate destruction of death – at least a third of people aren’t so stupid as to pretend to imagine that they can escape from this insulting attack on them by attacking other people who may be just as equally victimized by it as they are. Only evil people pretend that, as the whole of conscious existence or “God” has already attacked them first and will always continue to do so, they are entitled to randomly counter-attack any and all of its individual component parts (people) in response!

Naturally, their excuse on an individual basis is to conflate such ultimately only pretended division with the whole: “So what? My crimes aren’t crimes because we (i.e: You) all do it, too!”

What the criminal "psychopath" really hates, is the trick God plays on them by pretending to be divided!

See also: Muhammad’s "islam:" it's how and why Muhammad was the "Perfect Example of Humanity for Mankind!"


Further, each of these thought-killing, "psychopathic syndromes: paranoia; masochism; hypocrisy" are all really only bad habits, based on permanent patterns of past fears, present greeds and future fear-limited, greedy hopes to avoid more of the same by manipulating others into agreeing with one's denials of guilt.

All of our solid, past fears; fluid, present greeds; and nebulous, future hopes: made into static idols!

And such people cannot ever truly be happy because, as self-determined cynics, they remain stuck in denial at the initial reaction of Fear, which is only the starting point of the dynamic Greek thought process; and so the scary past and useless future are deliberately ignored; only the greedy present is embraced by these habitually irresponsible hedonistic and conscienceless criminally negligent delinquent "libertines!"

So, to recap:

Backwards, fear-focused "paranoia" leads to the presently greedy state of "masochism" where the slanderous victim-blaming "paranoid" criminal coward tries to "control" and limit their fears by causing the pains they fear the most; which leads to hypocrisy, with the greedy hope of in future inducing gangs of others to join them in their plans to help them cause the pains they fear the most, to exonnerate them of guilt!





They are criminally negligent masochists - always pretending to "control" their fears, BY causing those very same worst-case scenario problems (like, by antagonizing innocent other people) which cause the pains they fear the most.

If you teach kids they have a right not to be offended or have their feelings hurt by the often-painful Truth, that "There's No Wrong Answers!" then you are also training them to never have to admit they're wrong, or to learn from their mistakes; hence: TROLLS.

Ottawa Libs Tell Us To Love The Muslims Who Murder Us, Or Else We're Racists!

As the old joke goes: "So, a Muslim blows up a bar ..." No, really.
To leftopaths, it doesn't matter what Muhammad wrote in his silly Qur'an 1,400 years ago, because there are no real crimes nor criminals, because we have no free will choice or mens-rea criminal intent - ever! In stead, we're all really ever only helpless fellow victims - of mysterious (yet somehow also "inevitable") forces outside our comprehension and control, like of "society," being mere "products of our environments" and of course proudly helpless slaves of unknown and unknowable Allah! So basically, all liberals are muslims, and all muslims are libertine criminals.
So it's really no surprise that, two days after a muslim mass murder rampage in Toronto, the National Post and Ottawa Citizen's own Terry Galvin would tell us evil white hatefully racist bigots to Submit to muslim violence because we all do it, too!

If people cannot find it within themselves to extend the same compassion to the Hussains that is being shown victims' families, they should be ashamed

To try to look on the bright side, maybe the reason last weekend’s Danforth shooting rampage has pushed some people into an abyss of hysteria is that Toronto truly is one of the world’s great peaceable cities, and the horror of what happened has been just too much of a shock. Maybe it’s got something to do with the ubiquity of rancid disinformation and malicious pseudo-news these days that a meanness and heartlessness so quickly intruded into what was, in the early goings, a moment of shared mourning, a “Toronto Strong” moment of quiet civic decency and resilience.
Maybe the simple, ugly reason that so little sympathy has been on hand for the parents of the severely mentally ill and now-dead shooter — they have another son who has been in a coma for more than a year, and their daughter died in a car accident about five years ago — is that they are Muslim. Or maybe it’s just because it was their son who committed the unconscionable act, that their own crushing anguish and sorrow is cruelly dismissed as somehow less deserving of any public sympathy.
The Hussains' own crushing anguish and sorrow is cruelly dismissed as somehow less deserving of any public sympathy
Maybe now that the so-called Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the Danforth mass shooting, the hoarse, howling voices at the margins will come to wholly overwhelm the public conversation. Or maybe their inanities will implode and collapse around their heads while everybody else notices that the official propagandists for ISIL “caliph” Abu Bakr al Baghdadi also claimed that last October’s mass shooting in Las Vegas was one of their jobs — an absurdity the FBI unequivocally dismissed. And that the security evacuation of Charles De Gaulle airport in Paris a month earlier was not because of bombs ISIL claimed to have planted, but rather because of an unruly woman who was prevented from boarding a plane. And that the shooting rampage at a casino in Manila that ISIL claimed as its own operation last June turned out to be the frenzy of a deeply indebted gambler.
Maybe a lot of things. Innocently genuine speculation isn’t always easily distinguishable from rumour-mongering, and the public platform that social media so readily provides does tend to lower the tone.
When the shooter was first identified as a white male, the novelist Christine Estima, who is ordinarily quite the comedian, took to Twitter this way: “We need to put a ban on white men until we can figure out what’s going on.” This might have been funny, even, were it not for the screaming sirens, the sheer terror of that night in Toronto, the wounded strewn about the street, and the dead. Reese Fallon, 18 years old, had planned to study nursing at McMaster University this fall. Julianna Kozis, from Markham, Ont., was 10.

Toronto Danforth shooting victims: 18-year-old Reese Fallon and 10-year-old Julianna Kozis.Facebook; Handout

For a while there, it might not have been wholly unreasonable to wonder out loud about whether the shooter, who turned out to be 29-year-old Faisal Hussain, could have been possessed of a motive, if you could call it that, that derived in some fashion from the crackpottery of death-cult jihadism. But there is nothing reasonable about the sort of thing making the rounds that was typified by the notorious Ezra Levant when he chimed in, this way: “Did the police withhold the shooter’s name for a day so they could scrub evidence of Islamist (sic) from his social media accounts?”
Levant followed that up with this: “I’m curious how the name of the Toronto shooter was withheld for a day, and the moment it was released, a Muslim reporter at the CBC state broadcaster issues an official statement from ‘the family’ — that he was mentally ill, nothing to do with Islam.”
Even that might have been funny, although too clever by half, had it come from a parody account. But it wasn’t even intended to be funny. It was a filthy insinuation. There is nothing that distinguishes the CBC’s Shanifa Nasser, who may or may not be Muslim for all that it matters, except that she is a damn fine journalist, and she was not alone in reporting the Ontario Special Investigations Unit’s decision, arising from what the SIU called “the exceptional circumstances of this tragic incident,” to identify the shooter by name. Neither was Nasser alone in reporting the contents of family’s statement.

Toronto Danforth shooter Faisal Hussain. Hussain family/AP

It doesn’t exactly help clarify anything, being invited to see something sinister in the involvement of Muslim community activist Mohammed Hashim, an organizer with the Toronto and York Region Labour Council, in the preparation and distribution of a statement on behalf of Hussain’s parents. The Toronto Sun referred to Hashim as the family’s “spin doctor,” but if Hashim had a hand in helping the family compose their statement, fair play to him. As events have proved, the family was going to need help, precisely because they happened to be Muslims. It’s a wonder Hussain’s parents haven’t been hounded to present themselves in some public place to loudly swear a loyalty oath.
In their statement, the Hussains express their condolences to the families victimized by their son’s horrific actions, and then get straight to the heart of what is a soul-crushing, heartbreaking and lonely predicament endured by tens of thousands of families across Canada: “Our son had severe mental health challenges, struggling with psychosis and depression his entire life. The interventions of professionals were unsuccessful. Medications and therapy were unable to treat him.”

A Toronto Police van parks in front of the Thorncliffe Park apartment building where shooting suspect Faisal Hussain lived with his parents, on July 23, 2018. Tamara Lush/AP

They go on: “While we did our best to seek help for him throughout his life of struggle and pain, we could never imagine that this would be his devastating and destructive end. Our hearts are in pieces for the victims and for our city as we all come to grips with this terrible tragedy. We will mourn those who were lost for the rest of our lives.”
Evidence may yet emerge to the effect that at perhaps some very recent stage in the psychosis that tormented him, Faisal Hussein had been twisted beyond recognition by imbibing the online vileness of some bloodthirsty Islamist hate preacher. But all that is, or should be, immaterial to what is required right now of the people of Toronto — Toronto Strong, as the city likes to describe itself in the teeth of these tragic events. If the people cannot find it within themselves to discharge the same duty of solidarity and compassion in respect of Hussain’s parents, to enclose them as warmly within the embrace of their empathy as the families of Reese Fallon and little Julianna Kozis, then they should be ashamed of themselves.


Naturally, these other leftopaths also embrace the argumentum tu quoque fallacy, claiming that since non-muslims also sometimes commit mass murders, islam isn't a crime-gang!

Thursday, July 19, 2018

Deep State Sale: CIA fronts Amazon to Buy Washington Post

Could Amazon be intertwined with the deep state? That might be a terrifying question we all need to ask ourselves. And it isn’t as absurd as it may sound.

In 2013, Jeff Bezos purchased the Washington Post. The Washington Post hasn’t attempted to hide its disdain for President Trump in any fashion. In fact, it has been a liberal mouthpiece for years. The Trump victory has only driven it even deeper into its biases.

But what’s more? Well, a lot, actually.

Amazon was long known to be one of the “largest, most unprofitable company in history.” Amazon wasn’t even a profitable company (officially) until 2013. For many people, that’s a shocking statement, but its true. Bezos, of course, was getting richer by the minute taking a salary, but the company really wasn’t making money. Bezos claimed all the while he was in it for the long term. The company wasn’t a profit machine.

But it became one. And that happened in 2013.

In 2013, the CIA awarded Amazon and Bezos a $600 million cloud computer contract. Later that year, the Washington Post deal went down for $250 million. Bezos used just under half of his revenue from the CIA contract to buy a liberal stronghold media giant.

The Washington Post loves to cite “unnamed sources.” This day and age, or what we might term “post-Trump,” has become a time that embraces the “unnamed sources.” What used to revolve around media integrity, has now turned into an opportunity to spin tales. Many of these “unnamed sources” for the Washington Post come from stories regarding insider information via the CIA.

The CIA. Amazon's owner Jeff Bezos. The Washington Post. 
They are all truly only one entity at this juncture in our lives.

John Brennan, the acting CIA Director, appointed by President Obama was outspoken regarding President Trump’s campaign and potential Russian ties. He even went so far as to testify before Congress regarding this.

Brennan is a former communist. In 1976, he voted for Communist Party USA candidate Gus Hall in the presidential election; he later said that he viewed it as a way “of signaling my unhappiness with the system, and the need for change.”

Brennan, a former communist party vote caster, and Obama loyalist, is the one who started the FBI probe into the Trump administration. Being the Director of the CIA and clearly tied to Bezos, the owner of the Washington Post, should be viewed as more than just slightly opportunistic. It’s incredibly advantageous to them, and incredibly dangerous to Truth, Justice, and the American Way.

The Washington Post has been relentlessly pursuing Trump and Russia. They even remain locked in following Comey’s testimony which clearly detached Trump from any Russian involvement. It's a secretive anti-American propaganda machine, ultimately financially subsidized and originally paid for by your tax dollars, but ultimately owned and controlled by the devoted enemies of America. This is what the "Deep State" really looks like, people!

Derek Paulson
Prepared Patriot

Friday, July 6, 2018

Gangster "Democracy" IS Slavery!



As an insurance company, government IS enforced victimology: taking from the able to give to the (hopefully only temporarily) disabled victims.

After a while, though, and based on the fallacy of modern education, which seeks to discover why, not how, people do the things they do, it's ever-expanding list of who constitutes a victim class now includes "everybody!" and even those who are physically able, yet unwilling to work, are classified as being "depressed" and suffering from "mental illness" (as being helpless victims of their own mysterious yet somehow also inevitably-forced emotions)!

This is how individualism becomes collectivism - as if deferring one's free-will rights and responsibilities to self-determination over to a group or gang of equally fallible humans pretending to be superior "authorities" has ever, will ever, or can ever really work out in the real world! How is a gang of victims less so than only one?!



Authorities have only rights but no responsibilities to those they rule, while their subjects have no rights to defend themselves from said authorities, but only the responsibility to become and remain their slaves. The West is ruled by corporations. Corporations are made up of salesmen. Salesmen are lying hypocrites.

PS: "Marxism" is simply gangster extortion aka slavery.

It's "Authoritarianism."


"CULTURAL MARXISM" is a bloviating term made up by self-absorbed pseudo-intellectual college professors to describe how psychotic criminal gangsters want to impose might-makes-right slavery in all of the separate "identity politics," (symptom categories which people can be divided into) so they can divide and conquer all of the law-abiding people by fraudulent trickery - catering to their unthinkingly useless and static emotions of "pity for victims," in stead of dynamically exercising their brains to solve all cause-and-effect problems. Just as with other creeds predating Marx (islam) they want you to compromise and Submit.

Whatever its name, enslaving criminal gangsters want you to go along with their lies, to get along with them as they commit their crimes against you. They want useful idiots to help them by demanding that you all be enslaved by them for your own good!

(And as an aside, this is what the media echo-chambers are for).

By "Equality" they always mean FORCED equality of outcome.

This enslaves the Makers to the Takers.

Naturally, since this virtue-signalling "Equality" and "Diversity" (which falsely implies all differences are really similarities, or at least should be morally or emotionally treated as such) caters to the lowest common denominator at the direct expense of the exceptional, and elevates the less competent slackers to an "equal" position of outcome with those who were able to earn it, it might as well be called "POLITICS AS USUAL" - at least, in a "Democracy!"

No real need for anyone to have ever even actually read, much less to have to quote, from Karl Marx!

Every new and larger generation of children* who were recently enslaved to their parents and envy their wealth, who don't know how to work or earn their own, want a parental government to seize and give it to them! So every new and ever-larger generation of voters in a democracy will vote for more slavery! And those indoctrinated into this slavery since birth (muslims) can also be counted on to vote Democrat, too!

This idiocy can't be attributed to as recent an idol as Karl Marx. Ancient peoples still practice slavery.

And "politicians," defined as "power-traders," are ultimately not only useless (because who really needs to pay and defer to people to write ever-more meticulously convoluted and detailed laws to detail every last conceivable circumstantial and situational sub-category of the simple "Do Not Attack First" Golden Rule?!) but also dangerous, because in the political flip-flop between the Golden Rule-centered law of "Leave us alone!" and the criminal gangsters' "Enslave us all for our own good!" poles, we actually not only enable but also actively condone and enshrine into our "democratic" laws the latter, criminals' creed!

Our very laws admit and enhance crime itself, especially the false "civil" law, where no real rules apply!



All "Democracy" really means is "We get to vote for stuff!" Well, so what?! Big deal! Democracy has been best defined as "power-trading."

ALL power-trading politicians are professional hypocrites and traitors.

Democracy - even direct democracy - is slavery, because it presumes you must give up your right to control your own stuff to groups of other people.

"Hah!" fools say, "I have a right to vote for the fate of my stuff! I love Democracy! It's great for me!"

Well, "So do we too have a right to vote for the fate of your stuff!" says the Majority of other people!

Why should anyone else have any rights to control any of your property? Why should you be responsible to them?!

Why should criminals be allowed to vote to "progressively" legalize crimes at all, ever?!

To vote against logic and reason?!

We only need The Golden Rule of Law - having the responsibility to not attack, and the right to not to be attacked, first.

No further legislation is needed, beyond delineating the boundaries of one's contractually negotiated property. No "authority" is needed, beyond enforcing one's property rights. A (very!) limited "monarchy" would satisfy this criteria. And with it, taxes could be reduced to almost nothing.

Otherwise, libertine "liberal" criminals get to incrementally, "progressively" legalize all crimes through "democracy," while it also remains blazingly obvious that if and when one gives muslims "democracy" they WILL vote - for MORE ISLAM!




Why do Millennials embrace socialism? Why do two thirds of the population - the psychopaths and undecided - vote so consistently for it, even while being ripped off again and again by it? It's because of corporate education.

Just try telling them that socialism is slavery because it doesn't allow for any individuals to own any property.

They will reply with "So what? I don't own any property, and at least under socialism the government will have to give me stuff, and feed and clothe me, by taking it from all those Makers who hoard it and won't give it to me!"

Having been raised apparently enslaved by parents who controlled everything, and in school systems where they all were treated like criminals and prisoners, they don't know anything else and so cannot imagine owning anything! And since children are the only people who really - albeit only temporarily - deserve to have rights without legal responsibilities, this irresponsibility becomes ingrained in them.

The only dreams they have are rising to the top of the socialist crime-gang by extorting more from the Makers!

Monkey-see, monkey-do! Corporate gangsters own and control government gangsters and they all sell slavish pity for criminals as being the height of virtue, and being angry at criminals for committing crimes as a vile sin.

TO REPEAT: Why should might-makes-right focused criminals be allowed to "vote" to "progressively" legalize crimes at all, ever? To vote against logic and reason?

Who needs gangster "democracy" at all, anyway?!


Monday, June 18, 2018

AN UNPOPULAR TRUTH: "Multi-Culturalism" IS "Racism!"

Our freedom of association right is a choice extortionist conformist gangster criminal slavers (aka libertine "liberals") are trying to forcefully take away from us.

It's obviously at least 13X cheaper to take care of muslim losers in their own countries or in the adjacent Arabic-speaking islamic shiiteholes - so this "migrant" scheme must be about something else entirely. Now, what could that be?

"Multiculturalism was made up by self-loathing rat bastards to pretend that inferior cultures and superior cultures are equal. It exists to tell nice lies about rotten cultures and rotten lies about great cultures. The UN exemplifies this lie, with “Islam means peace” its biggest lie."

 - The Sheik -

As always, the world is divided into hard-working individualist Makers vs criminal gangster extortionist Takers.

Socialism is extortion.
Fascism is extortion.
Islam is extortion.

Perpetual extortion is slavery.



Lazy self-hating victimology-spewing masochists always want to dilute the blame for their self-inflicted problems onto groups and gangs of other people.

Nationalism is people exercising their right to freedom of association.

Communism denies all individual human any and all rights and forces people to associate with criminal oppressors.

"Racism" shames (white) people to give up their free-association rights in order to accept criminals.
But "racism" is simply the result of generations of free-will freedom of association rights choices.

ALL people prefer to associate with those who are like them.

Without this inherent "racism" there would be NO "races!"

So the pretense that only whites are racists, could only be true if there were only two races on Earth - the white race, and everyone else (which would be a single other race, and not the Negroes, Asians, and Dravidians - ALL of whom currently outnumber the whites because they prefer to have more sex with the people like them whom they have chosen to freely associate with)!

That's proof that the heedless delinquent libertine globalist agenda is indeed only out to destroy one race but not any of the others!

Do liberals insist there should be an invasion of whites or Asians into Africa, to dilute the Negro race, for the sake of "equality and diversity!"?


Do they insist hordes of Dravidians, whites, and Negros be imported into Asia, for the same fake "reasons!"?


Do they insist India should be invaded by Asians, whites, and Negroes, to dilute the Hindu Dravidians?

Again - NO!


"Racism" is merely the result of people exercising their freedom of association rights.

Again: Without "racism" there would be no "races." Thus every race is inherently "racist," and the more populous, global majority ones obviously (from the results) are the most "racist" of them all.

Which makes the white race, which comes in at only between 7-15% (if one includes all the other members of the 'Caucasians,' such as Arabs and Jews) the LEAST racist race of them all!

Further, the globalist liberal "racism" scam is really the exact opposite of what it pretends to be:
it pretends to equalize the racial disparity caused by racist whites in only white countries.

Remember: whites are actually THE global minority - so liberal "anti-racists" are really insisting it's not fair that the global minority isn't letting the global majorities further dilute them in their own lands!

It's obvious that freely-associated peer groups, once they attain some measure of expert authority in their chosen fields of endeavor, (whether by actual merit, or by incestuous self-promoting cronyism) will be challenged by other groups whose members are comprised of other freely-associated peer groups (or "tribes").

But this common occurrence does not mean that the group with the power - whether held only because of its current majority (might-made-right) status, or not (as in: by merit) is any more or less "racist" or "biased" than the (supposedly minority) of newcomer group/s opposing it.

To slanderously pretend that the existing group only attained and maintains its power through the racist exclusion of others is just as faulty a lack of logic as is claiming those other groups now deserve to be in charge simply because they are in a ("poor, oppressed") minority and/or assert, without evidence - that they have been racially discriminated against in the past, and so now demand reconciliation and reparations.

I'm talking about companies the membership of which can allegedly be regulated by the government (and I say "allegedly" because while in practice this is always being tried by legislative over-reach, in logic it really can't be, as merit-based hiring affects the companys' bottom lines) and/or their clients (i.e: all citizens equally, which makes sense, because everyone's money is worth the same, and everyone who becomes a citizen and agrees to the Golden Rule equally deserves the rights thereby earned by all others who have also agreed to adhere to it's responsibility).

Government-regulated promoting, hiring or clientele (as in: assigning the availability of university student placements) based on racial "diversity" is a crime: one which has severe financial costs to any society. It's a crime which is already technically illegal, being "under color" (or cover) "of Law!"

Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Leftists "Think" Jihadi Death-Threats Are Free Speech!

From here:

Reevely: Ford promises to ban Al-Quds Day protests somehow

Doug Ford before a transition meeting at the Ontario legislature. STAN BEHAL/TORONTO SUN/POSTMEDIA NETWORK

Doug Ford’s first new position as Ontario’s premier-to-be is that he’ll stop the annual anti-Israel protests called “Al-Quds Day.”
“Our government will take action to ensure that events like Al-Quds Day, which calls for the killing of an entire civilian population in Israel, are no longer part of the landscape in Ontario,” the Progressive Conservative premier-designate tweeted on Sunday.

Our government will take action to ensure that events like Al Quds Day, which calls for the killing of an entire civilian population in Israel, are no longer part of the landscape in Ontario.
How this squares with Ford’s campaign pledge to hold Ontario universities to hard standards in support of free speech, or even exactly what power he’d use to stop future Al-Quds Day observations, isn’t obvious.

"Somehow" as if it's absolutely impossible to stop any crimes at all, much less death-threats and calls for genocide. "Arresting criminal mobs? That's silly! Why bother?"
So, it also clearly "isn't obvious" to leftopaths like Reevely the weevil here how free speech and genocidal death-threats might not be exactly the same thing?
Asked to elaborate on both points Monday — what action? — his people didn’t respond. Maybe they don’t know.
Then he tries a red-herring deflection, choosing some harmless definitions:
Al-Quds Day started in Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979, which says a fair bit right there. “Al-Quds” is the Arabic for “Jerusalem,” and Al-Quds Day is a conscious response to Israel’s Jerusalem Day, a national holiday to mark Israel’s taking of the city in the 1967 Six-Day War. Always on a Friday at the end of Ramadan, the observance links Muslim religious obligation to support for Iran’s political aspirations in the Middle East. Specifically, its demonization of Israel and determination to evict Jews from East Jerusalem.
Even if Al-Quds Day is packaged as criticism of Israeli government policy, organizers would have to take immense care to keep speakers from spilling over into anti-Semitism. Historically, they have not taken that care.
The speeches vary from year to year but there’s a record of Holocaust denial and warnings about how death comes to all oppressors amid the chants to end Israeli Apartheid, just like Hamas and Hezbollah banners are mixed in with the Palestine flags.
Hate speech is criminal in Canada and B’nai Brith in Toronto says it’s filed a police complaint against a speaker who said he prays for “justice throughout the world” through “the eradication of the unjust powers, such as the American empire, such as the Israelis and Zionists, in the same way that we saw the British empire wither away.” The sun eventually set on the British empire, said Kitchener’s Shafiq Huda in a recording B’nai Brith posted, and God willing the sun will set on “the Zionist empire, the American empire” as well.

Parsing whether that’s legally hate speech — let alone a call to genocide — might take some doing. I mean, it’s not nice, but that’s not the standard. 
So why pick a pathetic quote chosen by B'nai B'rith as if it's seminal?!

Even if it is criminal hate speech, we punish people after they commit crimes, not before. 
And yet somehow genocidal death-threats are considered crimes in them selves. 
Funny thing, that - maybe because they are psychological attacks?
Beyond that, he's also wrong: it's perfectly kosher to punish people for "only even merely" attempted crimes, because in criminal law, only intent counts!
Unpopular political views get the constitution’s most thorough cover from censorship.
Who gives a shit what Turdeau Sr.'s leftopathic crime-constitution says?!
And what's this pretense - that holding rallies to incite violence and call for mass-murder and genocide are merely unpopular political views or otherwise harmless opinions?! Endorsing crimes IS a crime! Why isn't David Reevely in JAIL yet?!
Compare a ban on Al-Quds Day protests to how several provinces, recently including Ontario, have handled aggressive protests outside abortion clinics. 
Why should we?! This is at best only an Argumentum Qu Quoque fallacy!
Faced with evidence that those protests are sometimes used as cover to physically confront particular women going into those clinics, governments have said you can still protest abortion, still call abortion doctors baby-murderers, still demand changes to the law. You just have to do it half a block away.
So you're saying you can always threaten people with death if you're far enough away from them when you do it? Because bullets don't exist?!
Toronto’s Al-Quds Day thing drew about 500 people this year; Ottawa’s, maybe a few dozen. The Toronto protest typically travels from Queen’s Park to the American consulate-general a few blocks south, interfering with some traffic and taking up some public space.
So genocidal death-threat rallies inciting violence only temporarily plug traffic?
Nothing sinister ever really comes from them, (say, in Nigeria) so ignore them?
Ford talks about forbidding these things not just in Toronto or on the grounds of the legislature but everywhere in Ontario. Ottawa’s was so small hardly anybody noticed it. Both of them burned themselves out pretty quickly, as protests usually do. Police kept an eye on Toronto’s but didn’t interfere, because what’s the point. Everyone gets tired and goes home.
i.e: "What's the point of stopping small rallies calling for universal genocide?"
(HINT to leftopaths: because it's easier to arrest the few than the many?)!
One way to bring a lot more attention and energy to the demonstrations is to turn them into annual showdowns over free speech.
Right. The best way to solve problems and stop crime is always to ignore it.
Student groups are quite good at this. So many right-wing cranks have been “de-platformed” by left-wing cranks now that the newly elected government promises to create an investigative agency to assess how hard universities fight to defend minority views not just in classes but in the use of their facilities — and to take away funding if they aren’t vigorous enough in making sure the crank of the month gets to talk when a campus club wants to bring him or her in.
So "de-platforming" (violent riots threatening and maiming people) is legit too?
(Maybe Al-Quds Day protests would be best held at the University of Toronto and University of Ottawa, where the province would … insist they be allowed? That doesn’t sound right.)
You leftists claim it's the poor oppressed muslims' holy right and duty to "protest" other people being allowed to live unmolested in their countries, by holding mass-rallies issuing genocidal death-threats to be "free speech," and insist that the extortionist criminal gangsters be allowed to hold them as if they were the same as peaceful protests!
If what we’re after is endless escalations, arguments that the other guys said something worse first, politicians interfering with protests in advance and police officers deciding on the spot what’s legitimate speech and what isn’t, this is all off to a good start.
Sure, because defending yourself is just as bad as the criminals' aggressions!