Yes, ALL Muslims ARE Terrorists!

First off, here's a simple fact about islam which *might* even give your average muslim pause:

If and when muslims posit their god as being "unknown and unknowable," then it's incredibly hypocritical of them to pretend to be so outraged by other religions' alleged tellings of "lies" about the nature of god, that they feel obliged to go out and wage war and murder them for it.

That's really only them doubling-down on their own lies, for all religion is at best mere speculation presented as fact - in other words, it's all a pack of lies!

Therefore, who does islam *really* benefit? Obviously, not god.

So it can only be a lying excuse to benefit its fraudulent founder, Muhammad.

And there's a copious amount of anecdotal evidence (aka all the hadiths) to prove it, too.

i.e:

"WE SOMEHOW KNOW THAT GOD IS UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABLE,

AND IF YOU SAY OTHERWISE, YOU'RE A LIAR AND WE KEEL YOU FOR IT!"

That's islam in a nut's hell.

Beyond this simple and obvious truth, I just had to respond to a stupid article by Glenn K. Beaton as roasted by Hugh Fitzgerald, here:

Re: "Blaming today’s Muslims for 9/11 is like blaming today’s Germans for the Holocaust."

NO, IT REALLY ISN'T. If he had said "is like blaming all ARABS for 9/11," he'd have been correct.

But the equivalent of "muslims" (crime-gangsters) in this equation is "nazis" so let's try that one out:

"Blaming today’s Nazis for the Holocaust is like blaming today’s Nazis for the Holocaust."

Sorry, what?! Anyway, moving right along to his next fallacy:

Re: "So are all Muslims terrorists? No."

Actually, YES, they ARE.

According to even your own sharia "law" texts, no muslims are "civilians."

In islam, ALLAH DID NOT CREATE ALL HUMANS EQUAL!

According to the Qur'an, allah deliberately made infidels so muslims could murder them for him, as a test of their obedience (well, more as a joke, since allah knows in advance who will pass and fail his tests, and it's all predetermined predestined force anyway)!

If they truly follow islam, then YES muslims are ALL terrorists.

Just like you couldn't be a "nazi" and not support Hitler and Mein Kampf, you can't (by your own rules) be a "muslim" and not be a terrorist, because that's what the Qur'an commands and Muhammad himself did: terrorize and extort everyone else!

ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS!

"Terrorism" is really only the simple crime of "extortion" writ large! Extortion is "threats!"

ALL muslims are criminals, simply by being members of the world's largest and most ancient yet ongoing crime-gang.

Being a member of a crime-gang is a crime, even if the member hasn't committed any specific crime beyond that of their general membership, because they represent the inherent public threat the crime-gang presents.

It's the Law.

Everything muslims pretend to believe is "holy" is already a crime!

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells you muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur'an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims' heads.

(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him)."

It's all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn't by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

Sure, some dispensations from mandatory participation in jihad are given for physical disabilities, like for old age, blindness, lameness etc., but the very listing of those exemptions in your Qur'an only serves to prove that the word "jihad" means violent and non-defensive warfare.

And those exempted from physical participation are still obliged to be accessories and equip and otherwise assist those who are still physically able to participate in the raids.

That is, the Qur'an demands muslims wage offensive war - not in self-defense - but because of others' "disbelief!"

For instance:

9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

9:14. Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people,

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad when fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn

Muslims are commanded to hurt us in any way they can and are promised Brownie Points for it.

So don't go looking for what actions of yours may have offended or provoked them; they have been taught from birth that your existence alone offends their god, and so should offend them.

Muslims have been officially taught to believe that they are the “best of people” (Qur’an 3:110) and that unbelievers are the “most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).

So NO muslim is isolated from the evil crime of islam's mandatory "jihad" terrorism.

Read the Qur'an! It is inseverable: 2.85. Jihad is ordained for Muslims: 2.216. It commands acts of terrorism: 8.12, 57 & 60. It rewards acts of terrorism: 9.120. It commands perpetual war: 8.39 & 9.29. Believers are only those who wage war: 9.111 & 49.15.

What believing Muslim is not a terrorist? 33.21 orders Muslims to emulate Moe. Bukhari 1.8.387 & 4.52.220 have him bragging about winning with terror. 8.12, 8.57 & 8.60 command Muslims to engage in terrorism. 9.120 promises Brownie Points for acts of terrorism. Get a clue.

Moe was a terrorist: Bukhari 1.8.331 & 4.52.220. Muslims are commanded to emulate him: QV 33.21. They may not be actively engaged in terror acts, but all Muslims are terrorists. Islam is war: 2.216, 8.39, 57, 60, 65; 9.5, 29, 111. 120 & 123. Islam is all or nothing; a bundled package deal: 2.85.

Moe said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear. Look up the hadith in Tafsir Ibn Kathir "The Benefits Of Iron"; it is near the end of the page.

Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters. Look them up in Ibn Sa'd or alquraan.net.

He prayed for prey at Badr. He asked the "Lord of the Devils" for "the good of this town" before every ghazwat. Look it up in "The Life of Muhammad".pg. 510-511.

Crack open Sahih Bukhari and read the books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition, they show us what Islam really is. Obtain clues from the Qur'an, too. 3:151, 8:12, 39, 57, 60, 65, 67, 9:5, 29, 38, 39, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 47:4, 49:15, 59:2, 13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

If a Muslim is a believer, he is a threat to our lives, liberties and prosperity, whether in a pack or acting as a lone wolf.

Jihad is what Islam is; what Muslims do and it is defined in Islamic law as "war against non-Muslims." Look it up in "Reliance Of The Traveller" Book o, Chapter 9.0 and try to prove me wrong.

Offensive Jihad is fard al-Kifaya, to be performed in every year. When we retaliate, the obligation becomes fard al-ayn: binding on the entire Ummah individually. That makes every Muslim a ticking time bomb.

You hope that we Kuffar are stupid, ignorant and gullible. Unfortunately for you, a growing number of us are scratching below the surface, reading the Qur'an, hadith, exegesis & jurisprudence to discover the reality of Islam.

"The Book Of Jihad" and the second volume of "Hedaya" are excellent sources of information.

OBAMA’S TREASON: EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT

From here:

OBAMA’S TREASON: EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT
But Leftist Privilege will prevent him from ever being held accountable.

June 7, 2018  Robert Spencer

(This article is nearly a year old, but pResident Hussein still hasn't been charged).

The Washington Free Beacon reported Wednesday that “the Obama administration skirted key U.S. sanctions to grant Iran access to billions in hard currency despite public assurances the administration was engaged in no such action, according to a new congressional investigation.”

And it gets even worse: “The investigation, published Wednesday by the House Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, further discloses secret efforts by top Obama administration officials to assure European countries they would receive a pass from U.S. sanctions if they engaged in business with Iran.”

This revelation comes after the news that came to light in February, that, according to Bill Gertz in the Washington Times, “the U.S. government has traced some of the $1.7 billion released to Iran by the Obama administration to Iranian-backed terrorists in the two years since the cash was transferred.”

There is a law that applies to this situation. U.S. Code 2381 says: “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

In a sane political environment, Barack Obama would be tried for treason.

Barack Hussein Obama has planted seeds that will be bearing bitter fruit for years, and probably decades, to come. He is, without any doubt, the worst President in American history. Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan? Yes, the doughface Presidents made the Civil War inevitable, but worse came later. Grant? Blind to corruption and out of his depth, but there have been worse than he as well. Wilson? That black-hearted Presbyterian bigot arguably gave the world Hitler and World War II, so he is definitely in the Final Four. Harding? Nah: his tax cuts and return to “normalcy” got the American economy, and the Twenties, roaring. FDR and LBJ gave us the modern welfare state and dependent classes automatically voting Democrat; the full bill on the damage they did hasn’t yet been presented. Nixon? A crook and an economic Leftist, who betrayed Taiwan for the People’s Republic; his record certainly isn’t good. Carter? Nothing good can be said about his four years of sanctimony and incompetence.

But there is one thing Barack Obama has on all competitors: treason.

He showered hundreds of billions of dollars on the Islamic Republic of Iran. There are those who say, “It was their money. It belonged to the Iranian government but was frozen and not paid since 1979.” Indeed, and there was a reason for that: not even Jimmy Carter, who made the Islamic Republic of Iran possible, thought that money, which had been paid by the Shah’s government in a canceled arms deal, belonged to the mullahs who overthrew the Shah. Likewise Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush all thought that the Islamic Republic was not due money that was owed to the Shah.

Only Barack Obama did.

The definition of treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. The leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran order their people to chant “Death to America” in mosques every Friday, and repeatedly vow that they will ultimately destroy the United States of America and the state of Israel. How was giving them billions and helping them skirt sanctions applied by the U.S. government not treason?

Other Presidents have been incompetent, corrupt, dishonest, but which has committed treason on a scale to rival the treason of Barack Obama?

The Iranians also operate a global network of jihad terror organizations, one of which, Hizballah, is quite active in Mexico now, with the obvious ultimate intention of crossing the border and committing jihad massacres of Americans. Obama has given a tremendous boost to these initiatives, as well as to Iran’s nuclear program, with his nuclear deal that has given the Iranians hundreds of billions of dollars and essentially a green light to manufacture nuclear weapons, in exchange for absolutely nothing.

There is no telling when the worst consequences of Obama’s aid and comfort to the Islamic Republic of Iran will be felt. But they likely will be felt in one way or another. Even as President Trump moves swiftly to restore sanctions and put Iran on notice that its nuclear activity and global adventurism will not be tolerated, those billions cannot be recovered, and the Iranians have already spent a great deal for their jihad cause.

However this catastrophe plays out, there is one man who will suffer no consequences whatsoever: Barack Obama. That’s Leftist Privilege. It’s good to be a powerful Leftist in Washington nowadays. Laws? Pah! Laws are for conservatives.

================

When will Black Osama be charged with ANY crime?!?!?!

;-/

Microsoft Assists China in Creating AI to Help Find and Execute Civilian Dissenters to Communist Rule

From here:

Microsoft colluding with communist Chinese military to build AI systems that will execute civilians who resist government rule

By Vicki Batts 25 April 2019.

Natural News) Microsoft has been working with a Chinese military-run university on researching artificial intelligence that could be used for censorship and surveillance, according to a shocking new report from Financial Times. A series of scientific studies were co-authored by researchers from Microsoft Research Asia and scientists associated with China’s National University of Defense Technology (NUDT). This apparent relationship between Microsoft and a Chinese military university is now giving rise to a tidal wave of concerns.

A number of experts have spoken out about the potential risks of U.S.-China academic relations, but there are also serious red flags about the artificial intelligence (AI) that Microsoft and the Chinese were working to develop. The research points to widespread surveillance and censorship, and people across the tech industry and from around the political spectrum are outraged over Microsoft’s role in enabling the Chinese government’s oppression of its citizens.

Microsoft and communist China research AI censorship

Microsoft and the Chinese military-run university NUDT have joined forces to work on research for AI that could be used for nefarious purposes. A trio of recently published papers have revealed their silent partnership for all the world to see.

One paper explores a new AI technique for recreating elaborate environmental maps through the surveying of human faces. Breitbart reports that experts caution such technology will have immediate use in the surveillance arena.

Samm Sacks, senior fellow at the New America think tank and China tech expert, says that these papers raise “red flags because of the nature of the technology, the author affiliations, combined with what we know about how this technology is being deployed in China right now.”

“The [Chinese] government is using these technologies to build surveillance systems and to detain minorities [in Xinjiang],” she reportedly added.  And we all know what happens to people who get blacklisted in China. Threats, attacks and disappearances are all far too common among communist China’s dissidents.

Other papers published by Microsoft and NUDT focused on machine learning. Experts say that while this area of tech may not sound “concerning,” machine learning could be key for the Chinese government to engage in censorship at scale.

Microsoft’s joint research efforts with the NUDT will undoubtedly serve the Chinese government’s goals to have complete dominion over its people.

Microsoft under fire

A number of U.S. legislators have called out Microsoft’s partnership with China. Sen. Marco Rubio recently described it as “deeply disturbing,” and said it was “an act that makes them complicit” in China’s abuse of human rights.

Microsoft has defended their abhorrent partnership with NUDT, declaring that their partnership with Chinese military has helped them to “advance our understanding of technology.” The company states further that it is important for their scientists to work with experts from around the world to continue advancing forward.

“In each case, the research is guided by our principles, fully complies with U.S. and local laws, and the research is published to ensure transparency so that everyone can benefit from our work,” Microsoft’s statement said further.

But experts say that the technologies Microsoft has helped NUDT research can easily be used for unsavory purposes, such as censorship and targeted surveillance.

According to Business Insider, Chinese authorities are already using the facial recognition software to track and detain over one million Muslim minorities.

Anyone who dares to act or speak against the communist regime also faces detainment.

Microsoft is not the first company to bend the knee to communist China. Google recently came under fire for “blacklisting” a political dissident at the behest of the Chinese government.

Apple has also faced scrutiny for allowing the foreign regime to dictate what apps are available or banned from the app store. Across the board, it seems that Big Tech has no problem with colluding with a government seeking to violate its citizen’s natural rights — and it’s not just happening in China.

See more coverage of Big Tech’s latest atrocities and more at Glitch.news.

Sources for this article include:

Breitbart.com

FinancialTimes.com

BusinessInsider.com

HOW TO BURY A HORRIBLE ATROCITY WITH CONTEXTUAL BULLSHIT - Mark Steyn

From here:

Taqiyya for Easter

by Mark Steyn

Let’s say a fire breaks out at Notre Dame cathedral in Paris at the start of Holy Week, and just after two of the city’s other most prominent houses of worship – St Sulpice and the Basilica of St Denis – have been attacked and vandalized.

Well, I think we can all confidently say as the first flames are beginning to lick the ceiling that it’s undoubtedly an accident. Cigarette butt. Or maybe computer glitch. Probably just an overheated smartphone. We don’t need to get in there and sift through the debris. We can just announce it.

On the other hand, when there are coordinated attacks on Easter services at several churches in Sri Lanka, it becomes a little more challenging to pass off multiple suicide-bombings killing nearly three hundred people as an electrical malfunction.

So, in contrast to the confident declarations of a week ago, on Sunday morning the media opted for a subtler narrative. Lead sentence from The Economist:

IT HAS BEEN nearly ten years since the guns fell silent in Sri Lanka’s civil war. But bloodshed returned with a vengeance…

So it’s something to do with the Tamil Tigers? Their guns fell silent, but now they’ve returned with a vengeance, eh?

Well, er, no, er, not, ah, precisely… But it’s useful for “context”, lots and lots of context. And, if you pile up enough context, you can bury the actual story. My old chums at The Age in Melbourne produced an especially fine example:

Colombo: More than 200 people were killed and hundreds more wounded in eight bomb blasts that rocked churches, luxury hotels and other sites in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday – the deadliest violence the South Asian island country has seen since a bloody civil war ended a decade ago.

Ah, there’s that bloody civil war flaring up all over again, right?

Steady on. We’re not quite saying that, but it’s important to know the historical background and so forth…

The scale of the bloodshed recalled the worst days of Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war, in which the Tamil Tigers, a rebel group from the ethnic Tamil minority, sought independence from the Buddhist-majority country. The Tamils are Hindu, Muslim and Christian.

So it’s a Hindu-Muslim-Christian attack on churches and hotels?

Er, not exactly. We’re still doing ten paragraphs of general throat-clearing here…

Sri Lanka, situated off the southern tip of India, is about 70 per cent Buddhist. While there have been scattered incidents of anti-Christian harassment in recent years, there has been nothing on the scale of what happened on Sunday.

So it’s part of a tradition of Buddhists’ anti-Christian harassment?

Well, these Buddhists are notoriously “hard-line”…

There is also no history of violent Muslim militants in Sri Lanka. However, tensions have been running high more recently between hard-line Buddhist monks and Muslims.

So the hard-line Buddhists attacked the churches to get at the non-hard-line Muslims?

Whoops, did we give you the impression Muslims had something to do with this? Our mistake…

Two Muslim groups in Sri Lanka condemned the church attacks…

Let us turn to The New York Times:

Religious Minorities Across Asia Suffer Amid Surge in Sectarian Politics

Gotcha. This is all part of a general problem of various unspecified religions in unspecified countries suffering in a general sort of way. But could you be a little less general and more specific?

Okay. Opening paragraphs:

The deadly attacks in Sri Lanka on Sunday highlighted how easily religious coexistence can be ripped apart in a region where secularism is weakening amid the growing appeal of a politics based on ethnic and sectarian identity.

In India, the country’s governing right-wing Hindu party is exploiting faith for votes, pushing an us-versus-them philosophy that has left Muslims fearing they will be lynched if they walk alone.

In Myanmar, the country’s Buddhist generals have orchestrated a terrifying campaign of ethnic cleansing against the country’s Rohingya Muslims.

And in Indonesia and Bangladesh, traditionally moderate Muslim politicians are adopting harder-line stances to appeal to more conservative electorates.

So Hindus are attacking Muslims, and Buddhists are attacking Muslims, and “hard-line” Muslims are attacking moderate Muslims. Thank God for some clarity on the situation. But what were all these Muslims doing in church on Easter morning?

Well, as we said, it’s all very complex – not like “Edelweiss” being an obvious white-supremacist dog-whistle by a notorious Nazi Jew composer. Best not to think about it.

Sri Lanka is a popular tourist destination, so there were many western victims of yesterday’s attack, including young ones: from an eleven-year-old English boy and a ten-year-old Australian girl to three of the four children of Denmark’s wealthiest man, retail billionaire Anders Holch Povlsen. Yet throughout Sunday the UK, Aussie, Danish and the rest of the world’s media saw their job as thorough obfuscation of the truth. I heard about yesterday’s attack from the BBC, which had extensive rolling coverage with correspondents on the ground – and yet seemed mainly to be trying to tell us as little as possible. A lady think-tanker from Chatham House was keen to focus on the brutality with which the Sri Lankan government had ended the Tamil insurgency a decade ago: a fascinating topic no doubt, but utterly irrelevant to the mound of Christian corpses in Colombo that morning. In the entire hour, hers was the only mention of Islam – when she cautioned that it would be grossly irresponsible and “Islam-phobic” even to bring up the subject.

She didn’t really need to spell that out, did she? It used to be said that ninety percent of news is announcing Lord Jones is dead to people who were entirely unaware that Lord Jones was ever alive. Now the trick is to announce Lord Jones is dead and ensure that people remain entirely unaware of why he is no longer alive. One senses that a line was crossed in yesterday’s coverage. As one of our Oz Steyn Club members, Kate Smyth, put it, the media have advanced from dhimmitude to full-blown taqiyya.

The lights are going out on the most basic of journalistic instincts: Who, what, when, where, why. All are subordinate to the Narrative – or Official Lie. All day yesterday and into today, if you had glanced at the telly, switched on the radio or surfed the big news sites of the Internet, you would have thought the Tamil Tigers were back “with a vengeance”, as The Economist put it – even though with one exception (the 1990 police massacre) the death toll was higher than any individual attack the Tigers had ever pulled off.

Meanwhile, back in that fast shrinking space known as the real world, from the very first hours, the headline of this story was completely straightforward:

Islamic Suicide Bombers Slaughter Three Hundred on Easter Morning

But apparently, that can no longer be said.

NOTRE DHIM

From here:

The French cheese-eating surrender monkeys have become humus-eating Submission camels.

The Burning of Notre Dame and the Destruction of Christian Europe

by Guy Millière
April 22, 2019 at 5:00 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14107/notre-dame-destruction-christian-europe

• Barely an hour after the flames began to rise above Notre Dame -- at a time when no explanation could be provided by anyone -- the French authorities rushed to say that the fire was an "accident" and that "arson has been ruled out." The remarks sounded like all the official statements made by the French government after attacks in France during the last decade.
• The Notre Dame fire also occurred at a time when attacks against churches in France and Europe have been multiplying. More than 800 churches were attacked in France during the year 2018 alone.
• Churches in France are empty. The number of priests is decreasing and the priests that are active in France are either very old or come from Africa or Latin America. The dominant religion in France is now Islam. Every year, churches are demolished to make way for parking lots or shopping centers. Mosques are being built all over, and they are full.

The fire that destroyed much of the Notre Dame Cathedral in the heart of Paris is a tragedy that is irreparable. Even if the cathedral is rebuilt, it will never be what it was before. (Photo by Veronique de Viguerie/Getty Images)

The fire that destroyed much of the Notre Dame Cathedral in the heart of Paris is a tragedy that is irreparable. Even if the cathedral is rebuilt, it will never be what it was before. Stained glass windows and major architectural elements have been severely damaged and the oak frame totally destroyed. The spire that rose from the cathedral was a unique piece of art. It was drawn by the architect who restored the edifice in the nineteenth century, Eugène Viollet-le-Duc, who had based his work on 12^th century documents.

In addition to the fire, the water needed to extinguish the flames penetrated the limestone of the walls and façade, and weakened them, making them brittle. The roof is non-existent: the nave, the transept and the choir now lie in open air, vulnerable to bad weather. They cannot even be protected until the structure has been examined thoroughly, a task that will take weeks. Three major elements of the structure (the north transept pinion, the pinion located between the two towers and the vault) are also on the verge of collapse.

Notre Dame is more than 800 years old. It survived the turbulence of the Middle Ages, the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution, two World Wars and the Nazi occupation of Paris. It did not survive what France is becoming in the 21^st century.

The cause of the fire has so far been attributed to "an accident," "a short circuit," and most recently "a computer glitch."

How could a "computer glitch" cause it, when there's no electricity there to plug one in?

If the fire really was an accident, it is almost impossible to explain how it started.

Benjamin Mouton, Notre Dame's former chief architect, explained that the rules were exceptionally strict and that no electric cable or appliance, and no source of heat, could be placed in the attic. He added that an extremely sophisticated alarm system was in place.

The company that installed the scaffolding did not use any welding and specialized in this type of work. The fire broke out more than an hour after the workers' departure and none of them was present. It spread so quickly that the firefighters who rushed to the spot as soon as they could get there were shocked.

Remi Fromont, the chief architect of the French Historical Monuments said: "The fire could not start from any element present where it started. A real calorific load is necessary to launch such a disaster".

A long, difficult and complex investigation will be conducted.

The possibility that the fire was the result of arson cannot be dismissed. Barely an hour after the flames began to rise above Notre Dame -- at a time when no explanation could be provided by anyone -- the French authorities rushed to say that the fire was an "accident" and that "arson has been ruled out." The remarks sounded like all the official statements made by the French government after attacks in France during the last decade.

In November 2015, on the night of the massacre at the Bataclan Theater in Paris, in which jihadists murdered 90 people, the French Department of the Interior said that the government did not know anything, except that a gunfight had occurred. The truth came out only after ISIS claimed responsibility for the slaughter.

In Nice, after the truck-attack in July 2016, the French government insisted for several days that the terrorist who crushed 86 people to death was a "man with a nervous breakdown".

In 2018, Sarah Halimi's murderer, who recited verses from the Quran while torturing his victim, was declared "mentally disturbed" and held in a psychiatric institution immediately after his arrest. He will most likely never face a court. On April 8, Alain Finkielkraut and 38 other intellectuals published a text saying that her murderer must not escape justice. The text had no effect.

The fire at Notre Dame took place less than three years after a "commando unit" of jihadi women, later arrested, tried to destroy the cathedral by detonating cylinders of natural gas. Three days before last week's fire, on April 12, the leader of the jihadis, Ines Madani, a young French convert to Islam, was sentenced to eight years in prison for creating a terrorist group affiliated with the Islamic State.

The Notre Dame fire also occurred at a time when attacks against churches in France and Europe have been multiplying. More than 800 churches were attacked in France during the year 2018 alone. Many suffered serious damage: broken, beheaded statues, smashed tabernacles, feces thrown on the walls. In several churches, fires were lit. On March 5, the Basilica of St. Denis, where all but three of the Kings of France are buried, was vandalized by a Pakistani refugee. Several stained-glass windows were broken, and the basilica's organ, a national treasure built between 1834 and 1841, was nearly wrecked. Twelve days later, on March 17, a fire broke out at Saint Sulpice, the largest church in Paris, causing serious damage. After days of silence, the police finally admitted that the cause had been arson.

For months, jihadist organizations have been issuing statements calling for the destruction of churches and Christian monuments in Europe. Notre Dame was repeatedly named as a primary target. 

Despite all that, the Cathedral was not adequately protected.

A couple of young men, who entered the Cathedral at night, climbed on the roof last November and shot a video that they then put on YouTube.

Many messages were posted by people with Muslim names on social media -- Twitter, Facebook, the website of Al Jazeera -- expressing a joy to see an important Christian symbol destroyed. Hafsa Askar, a migrant from Morocco and the vice president of the National Union of Students of France (UNEF), the main student organization in France, published a tweet saying, "People are crying on little pieces of wood... it's a delusion of white trash".

French President Emmanuel Macron, who had never even mentioned the attacks on Saint Denis or Saint Sulpice, quickly went to Notre Dame and declared, "Notre Dame is our history, our literature, our imagination". He totally left out cathedral's religious dimension.

The next evening, he said that Notre Dame would be rebuilt in five years: it was a bold statement. Many commentators interpreted his words as dictated by his will desperately to try to regain the confidence of the French people after five months of demonstrations, riots and destruction stemming from his ineffective handling of the "Yellow Vests" uprising. (On March 16, much of the Champs-Élysées was damaged by rioters; repairs have barely begun.) All experts agree that it will almost certainly take far longer than five years to rebuild Notre Dame.

Macron strangely added that the cathedral would be "more beautiful" than before -- as if a badly damaged monument could be more beautiful after restoration. Macron went on to say that the reconstruction would be a "contemporary architectural gesture".

The remark raised concern, if not panic, among defenders of historic monuments, who now fear that he may want to ​​add modern architectural elements to a jewel of Gothic architecture. Again, he totally left out the cathedral's religious dimension.

Macron's attitude is not surprising. From the moment he became president, he has kept himself away from any Christian ceremony. Most of the presidents who preceded him did the same. France is a country where a dogmatic secularism reigns supreme. A political leader who dares to call himself a Christian is immediately criticized in the media and can only harm a budding political career.

Nathalie Loiseau -- the former director of France's National School of Administration and the leading candidate on the electoral list of Macron's party, "Republic on the Move," for the May 2019 European Parliament elections -- was recently photographed exiting a church after mass, which led to a media debate on whether her church attendance is a "problem."

The results of French secularism are visible. Christianity has been almost completely wiped out from public life. Churches are empty. The number of priests is decreasing and the priests that are active in France are either very old or come from Africa or Latin America.

The dominant religion in France is now Islam. Every year, churches are demolished to make way for parking lots or shopping centers. Mosques are being built all over, and they are full. 

Radical imams proselytize. The murder, three years ago, of Jacques Hamel, an 85-year-old priest who was slaughtered by two Islamists while he was saying mass in a church where only five people (three of them old nuns) were present, is telling.

In 1905, the French parliament passed a law decreeing that all the properties of the Catholic Church in France were confiscated. Churches and cathedrals became property of the State. Since then, successive governments have spent little money to maintain them. Those churches that have not been vandalized are in poor condition, and most cathedrals are in poor condition, too. 

Even before the devastating fire, the Archdiocese of Paris stated that "it can't afford all the repairs" that Notre Dame needed, "estimated at $185 million." According to CBS News, in a March 20, 2018 report:

"The French government, which owns the cathedral, has pledged around $50 million over the next decade, leaving a bill of $135 million. To raise the rest, Picaud helped launch the Friends of Notre-Dame of Paris Foundation. It works to find private donors both in France and across the Atlantic.
"'We know Americans are wealthy, so we go where we think we can find money to help restore the cathedral,' Picaud said."

I find it hard to feel sorry for him - the Vatican bank owns fully half the world's wealth!

On the evening of the fire at Notre Dame, hundreds of French people gathered in front of the burning cathedral to sing Psalms and pray. They seemed suddenly to understand that they were losing something immensely precious.

Following the fire, the French government decided to start collecting donations from private individuals, businesses and organizations for reconstruction; more than one billion euros have poured in. French billionaires promised to pay large sums: the Pinault family (the main owners of the retail conglomerate Kering) promised 100 million euros, the Arnault family (owners of LVMH, the world's largest luxury-goods company), 200 million euros, the Bettencourt family (owners of L'Oréal), also 200 million. Many on the French "left" immediately said that wealthy families had too much money, and that these millions would be better used helping the poor than taking care of old stones.

For the foreseeable future, the heart of Paris will bear the terrible scars of a fire that devastated far more than a cathedral. The fire destroyed an essential part of what is left of the almost-lost soul of France and what France could accomplish when the French believed in something higher than their own day-to-day existence.

Some hope that the sight of the destroyed cathedral will inspire many French people to follow the example of those who prayed on the night of the disaster. Michel Aupetit, Archbishop of Paris, said on April 17, two days after the fire, that he was sure France would know a "spiritual awakening".

Others, not as optimistic, see in the ashes of the cathedral a symbol of the destruction of Christianity in France. The art historian Jean Clair said that he sees in the destruction of Notre Dame an additional sign of an "irreversible decadence" of France, and of the final collapse of the Judeo-Christian roots of Europe.

How can an "art historian" pretend to opine on "decadence!"? Did he convert to islam?!

An American columnist, Dennis Prager, wrote:

"The symbolism of the burning of Notre Dame Cathedral, the most renowned building in Western civilization, the iconic symbol of Western Christendom, is hard to miss.
"It is as if God Himself wanted to warn us in the most unmistakable way that Western Christianity is burning -- and with it, Western civilization."

Another American author, Rod Dreher, noted:

"This catastrophe in Paris today is a sign to all of us Christians, and a sign to all people in the West, especially those who despise the civilization that built this great temple to its God on an island in the Seine where religious rites have been celebrated since the days of pagan Rome. It is a sign of what we are losing, and what we will not recover, if we don't change course now."

For the moment, nothing indicates that France and Western Europe will change course.

Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe
.

The COMPLETE Sell-Out Of America To The Brotherhood Mafia: Seaports & Islamist Reps, Omar & Tlaib, Seal The Deal!

Re-posted from here:

IN one of Mark Twain’s many works, “Following The Equator: A Journey Around The World “, he coined a timeless adage, that is, “truth is stranger than fiction.” By extrapolation, since good fiction writing has to stick to believable possibilities to make sense, as such, to hook the reader, truth possesses no such limitations. After all, it IS what it is!  

ALONG this trajectory of clear-eyed thinking, let’s segue from the mental image of yesteryear’s treasured storyteller, to a more contemporary and urban saying: “you can’t make this sh*t up!” Precisely.

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

الإمارات العربية المتحدة AL-IMĀRĀT AL-‘ARABĪYAH AL-MUTTAḤHIDAH

TO wit, before we tie in the (newly elected) Islamist poisons ensconced inside the halls of Congress to the Brotherhood Mafia’s hydra (one of which is operating America’s ports), it is imperative to hark back to a related treason, as reported on June 12, 2015: “Clinton, Inc. Sold Out America Via Port of Canaveral To The Brotherhood Mafia: Port Deals & More!”

TRUST, this is a prime example of the red-green alliance, even though they align for a multiplicity of reasons. So, if millions of patriots now know about this treachery, well…..Mind you, there are several addresses that (more than) deserve said backlash. “Resistance.”

NOT only that, three years down the road (2015 to 2018), downright passivity allowed the Brotherhood Mafia to strike again! As always, once they gain a sandal-hold (in this instance, ports and more), they never let go of major entry points – hook, line, and sinker. Dead on.

ALL of which should bring heavy-duty evidence of the same (to be exact, a little over six months ago) to the top of the national terrorism threat level: SEVERE/ RED!

IN this regard, for added heft; for some straight-shooting, and for a full-on education (as to what’s what), the advice within this site is: in order to understand what lies in wait, absorb the following evidentiary trails, .

ULFTAINER’s Russian Business Operations & More!

AFTERWARDS, if your head isn’t ready to explode, read below for an encapsulated version.

Gulftainer, the UAE-based port operator, on Wednesday (Sept.19, 2018) said it won a 50-year concession to operate and develop the Wilmington port in Delaware, USA, with a $600 million investment.

Privately-owned Gulftainer currently operates the Canaveral Cargo Terminal in the Port of Canaveral, Florida and provides services to the U.S. armed forces and the U.S. space industry.

The Delaware concession agreement completes a preliminary agreement between Gulftainer and the State of Delaware, as well as the completion of a formal review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), granting Gulftainer exclusive rights to manage the port.

Gulftainer, a Middle East-based company overseen by Dr. Hamid Jafar, Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction chief, and owned by his sons.

The Port of Wilmington is a full-service, deepwater port and marine terminal strategically located on 308 acres at the confluence of the Delaware and Christina Rivers.  Delaware’s Port is the first major port on the Delaware River – only 63 miles or 4 hours from the Atlantic Ocean.

Similarly, Gulftainer, the UAE-based ports company operating Florida’s Port Canaveral cargo container terminal despite the company’s ties to Saddam Hussein’s nuclear WMD program, is in a joint venture with Russian Technologies (Rostec). Rostec exports Russia’s Trojan Horse Club-K container cruise missile weapons system.

Watch this short video to see who Dr. Hamid Jafar is, and understand how insane these deals are to sell a major strategic US port to him.

MOVING onward….from one outrage to another….and another…..

OUTRAGEOUSLY, ominously, despite all of Gulftainer’s terror ties – for heaven’s sake – the Committee On Foreign Investment (AKA CFIU) had NO issue with Gulftainer’s terror roster, yes, and they DO hail from the worst of the worst! HINT: there is enough pay-for-play to squeak the greasy wheel; to look the other way. Be that as it may, one would expect that millions upon millions of Americans beg to differ. 

ALL of which is of piece with the fact that there are NO limits to the treachery – that the powers that be (from a multiplicity of agencies, and via both political parties) won’t find unacceptable. Intolerable.  

IT is with the above disinfectant in mind that it becomes crystal clear, and manifestly so – as to how Tlaib and Omar, Brotherhood Mafia Muslimas (with socialist revolutionary “AOC” in league), are able to storm and barrel through the halls of Congress. Most especially, after fellow Islamists paved the way through a little known Muslim-American political party – the likes of which reads like a “who’s who” among the top tier of terror-tied front groups – this is the case. 

INCONTROVERTIBLY, the following report should serve thusly: as demonstrative, as illustrative, and as “in-your-face” messages to all infidels (AKA kafirs) in America and beyond. Back up(s).

Tlaib spoke during a CAIR meeting in Chicago. Tlaib starting out by speaking in Arabic then switched, “You know, we always said ‘The Muslims are coming!’ Well, guess what? I think we’re here!” Next, Tlaib told a story about an interaction with John Dingell where he says “If you stand still enough on the river banks, you will watch your enemies float by dead.” Tlaib smiled and laughingly revealed how the now-deceased lawmaker’s words about watching her “enemies float by dead” made her feel so much better.

PATRIOTS, could she/they be any clearer?? Ever more revealing, leave it to the intrepid (yes, there are still some Jews who aren’t afraid to stand up and shout the damnable truth) Israel Advocacy Movement (from Britain, of all places) to let it all hang out via one video after another.

Now, the Israel Advocacy Movement has created a stunning video showing the close ties U.S. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) has with not one, not two, but multiple friends who are supporters and even friends of extreme terrorists.

INDEED, one such close terror tie, Jbara Mwafaq, hails the burning up of Jews as a “blessed” act  – through one of their choice methods of attack, that is, bus bombings in Israel!  

VIDEO: Rep. Omar About 9/11: ‘Some People Did Something’

WHICH brings us straight to Omar, Tlaib’s Muslima-In-Arms, an anti-American (refugee, no less) who requires little introduction to those who have been paying attention. Indubitably, her intent makes her a clear and present danger. In fact, she was outed in (one of) the referenced commentary, Tlaib and Omar, Brotherhood Mafia Muslimas!

MIND you, within the above linked video, ‘Some People Did Something‘ (emphasis placed), Islamist Rep Omar falsified the date of CAIRS’s founding and attributed/conflated it with a “reaction” to 9/11/01 – imagine that, to protect Muslims from backlash! Dangerous hogwash alike. In reality, CAIR was founded in 1994 (during a conference in Philadelphia) to serve as the propaganda arm of HAMAS – a top dog Brotherhood Mafia front group, and from the depths of the barbaric Middle East!

MOREOVER, Omar (Tlaib too), an out-and-out Jihadi supporter, is hardly backing down – supremely confident that she has the support of a majority of the Democratic-Socialist arm in Congress and other power centers. Thus, she giggled….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKaovRYkuEs

NOW, is that not enough of a reason to bring her before a special investigative committee, as she brazenly MOCKED the 3,000 plus victims who were incinerated by Islamic Jihadis – and not by “some people who did something” on 9/11/01? At the same time, she OPENLY backed Al-Qaeda and its acts of terrorism!

INEXTRICABLY, what will it take to elicit a clean sweep of the Brotherhood Mafia(and its agents) from America’s power centers and the nation at large? The question becomes: will it take a WMD attack to bring officialdom on board? Perhaps.

PATRIOTS, imagine this very realistic scenario: knowing what you do about the Brotherhood Mafia at large; its agents inside Congress (trust, there are more than you realize….they lie low, so to speak, unlike Omar and Tlaib), and, now, the “port deals”, how likely, how far off, before the signal is given to ship WMD materials  through their wholly owned ports? 

GUARANTEED, top Brotherhood Mafia leaders from the Middle East will give the order: ready, set, go….blow!! Of course, their main agents are deeply burrowed all across America, as this Jihadi expert repeatedly warned – here, here, here, here, here, etc., as back-benched by this most recent report. 

                                                                                                                                                       

More than 10,000 illegal aliens from countries designated as state sponsors of terrorism are living in the United States, according to federal data.

The countries of origin include Iran, North Korea, Syria and Sudan, said the Immigration Reform Law Institute, or IRLI, which referenced the data in a study reported by Breitbart News.

The illegal aliens either have been ordered deported or have pending deportation orders, despite remaining in the U.S., Breitbart said.

A total of more than 1.7 million illegal aliens remain in the U.S. despite having been ordered deported or having pending deportation orders.

IRLI Executive Director Dale Wilcox spoke to Breitbart News Tonight radio program on Sirius of the “very dangerous situation.”

“We have 10,000 aliens … some of them are criminals and that’s why they’ve been ordered removed,” he said. “You could have some that might have come into the country legally at some point. However, they’ve committed crimes and they’ve been ordered removed.”

Of the 10,000 from terror-sponsoring countries, about 6,000 are from Iran, Wilcox pointed out.

He noted that California, a “sanctuary” state that shields illegal aliens from federal immigration authorities, has the largest population of Iranians outside of Iran.

“We’ve had hearings here recently in Congress where U.S. intelligence officials have stated there are Iranian sleeper cells inside the United States, ready and waiting for the order,” he said.

The first attack on the World Trade Center, the New York subway bombing conspiracy and the 9/11 were plots perpetrated by immigration violators, said Wilcox.

“We saw on 9/11 the damage that only 19 sleeper cell terrorists could cause,” Wilcox said. “This is just the latest example of the disaster of sanctuary laws, which force ICE agents to operate with one hand tied behind their backs while making our communities inherently more dangerous.”

BY the way, when it comes to “bringing down America“, Sunni (Brotherhood Mafia) Jihadis merge forces with their Shia (Iranian agents/Hezbollah) counterparts – just like they did in 1993, during the first terror attack on the Twin Towers, a dry-run for 9/11/01! Know that Al Qaeda, Sunni Jihadis, received material support from Iran – as they prepped, then fled, into the sheltered arms of Iran and its terrorist masterminds!

INCONTESTABLY, if patriots stand aside, a recipe for disaster awaits. Still yet, to all those who refuse to see the forest from the (smoldering) trees, so be it. But don’t dare say you weren’t warned!

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED:

• This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
• If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Courtesy of Conservative Firing Line