Wednesday, November 28, 2018






"Mental illness," false pride, and "sin" are all the exact same criminal choice - and circular reasoning the only excuse.

When one is paranoid - imagining or knowing that Yes, the universe IS out to get one - that one cannot escape the endless dharmic cycle of physical damage, pain, the memory of that pain (fear) and then the memory of the betrayal of one's own ultimately useless greed for less, and hope for no, pain-causing damage and fears - and that one's own realizing thoughts inflict the conceptualized and generalized memory of past specific pain-causing damages (aka 'fears' or "Fear") on one - then: one must also posit that, as one did not create one's self, nor the external universe, one's own thinking fears or fearfully fearsome thoughts are *not* merely internally-generated helplful warnings, but are also exernally-generated ancillary pains, to be 'bravely' fought ignored or avoided. Thus all people are naturally self-indulgent, self-pitying masochists, self-generating the additional pains of fears, and naturally hypocrites, too, because they - we all - cause their own masochistic pains while blaming others: "Waah! I'm such a helpless victim, and nothing's ever my fault because everyone and everything else is always out to get me!" Habitually avoiding blame by lying about it leads to atrophy of the brain. This process of extra-polating hyperbole (rationally taking the risk vs reward, carrot and stick, fear and hope, binary to its ultimate logical conclusion-ratio, of all-and-or-nothing) is the method behind all self-inflicted madness.

This literally albeit metaphorically "unhinged," "irrationality" is inescapable: as it is only a simple binary equation.

One can thus also naturally choose to see all of one's emotions as the one single feeling of externally-inflicted pain, and all dynamic thought "processes" leading inevitably to that one single static fear-contracted conclusion - after all, what separates us from mere robots and computers, what makes us "uniquely" conscious, if not our own emotional feelings?

Therefore, the self-inflicted hypocrisy - the double-standards where one demands pity for one's self, and anger at all who refuse one the pity, and in stead demand accountability for one's alleged free-will choices and onerous responsibilities over one's right to always be given the benefit of the doubt and be judged, if at all, innocent until never proven guilty, as if such things as causes and effects (if they even exist) are too complex to ever be understood by everyone else, too, and so, as we're all merely equally helpless fellow victims of unknowably mysterious (yet also somehow mysteriously known as "inevitable") outside forces beyond our comprehension or control, there are no real criminals nor crimes, as if every victim who seems to choose to attack thereby innocent others first, and those who do not, are somehow also morally equal.

Our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending!

But, despite that simple fact - that our emotions are merely simple re-presentations of the three most basic states of spacetime, and that everyone has them equally - even most animals - we can still, if we choose to, continue to pretend to be unique and uphold our personal feelings as the only real morality.

And yet ultimately the only true reality is that, even if the whole universe *is* always out to get one, and one resents even being forced to defend one's self, much less to also have to feel the pain of sadness for, pity, and defend innocent others, too: one must realize that these are universal truths and logic, and, as such, must apply to any and all others, as well - to the alleged gods or God, to one's enemies equally: even if and when they choose to ignore their own fallible pain-caused damages, their own fearful memories (aka thoughts) of same, by taking the time to always attack all others first, to not only keep one's enemies perpetually on the defensive, but also to distract them from their own failures - those failures still remain, and in order to be conscious at all, all such cyclical pains, fears, and greedy hopes - all such ultimately painful emotions - must always apply equally to them, too. Everything is ultimately hurt and dies, and so, ultimately, nobody is unique; there can be no pain and fear-free (consciousness-free, thought-negating and unconscious "Heaven") so the psycho-paths' literally thought-killing ultimate goals are false, as are the promises of all religions.

One cannot, through cowardice, prevent the additional pains of fears by causing the pain-causing damages one fears most - either by attacking others and daring them to destroy one, or by self-destructively self-sacrificing for the greater good.

Static safety does not exist, and dynamic reality will always conquer such illusions. Face reality; ignoring it will fail.
Nobody is perfectly safe and happy, although imagining them to be generates the illusory feelings of same within us all.
To masochistically pretend to altruistically, magnanimously, self-sacrifice for such an idealized idea (idol or eye-doll) is only another, equally valid way of negating the self, refusing to attack, as opposed to always attacking others first.

These choices (each equally selfish) are the difference between good (refraining from attack) and evil (always attacking).


PS: Thought-constricted psycho-paths have winnowed their own mental response options down to the two very most basic emotional binaries: to the Good/Bad rule: Whatever's subjectively considered good for them, is pretended to be objectively good for everyone else, too; and ditto, but vice-versa, for all things subjectively, temporarily considered to be "bad."



When one is paranoid - imagining or knowing that Yes, the universe IS out to get one - then one's own realizing thoughts inflict the conceptualized and generalized memory of past specific pain-causing damages (aka 'fears' or "Fear") on one - and so there is no escape: one must posit that as one did not create one's self, nor the external universe, then one's own thinking fears are not merely internally-generated helplful warnings, but are also exernally generated ancillary pains, to be 'bravely' fought ignored or avoided. Thus all people are naturally masochists, self-generating the additional pains of fears, and naturally hypocrites, too, because they - we all - cause their own masochistic pains while blaming others.

One can thus also naturally choose to see all of one's emotions as the one single feeling of externally-inflicted pain, and all dynamic thought "processes" leading inevitably to that one single static fear-contracted conclusion - after all, what separates us from mere robots and computers, what makes us "uniquely" conscious, if not our own emotional feelings?

So despite that they are merely simple re-presentations of the three most basic states of spacetime, and that everyone has them equally - even most animals - we can pretend to be unique and hold our personal feelings as the only real morality.




Paranoid masochism and the hypocrisy required to cover it up is what defines psychopathy: First, the paranoia: you falsely and slanderously assert that everyone else is always out to get you, which choice "makes" (lets) you feel like a helpless victim all the time (self-inflicted masochism) which then lets one create false, hypocritical scenarios of NOT-blaming others, as long as they agree to go along (with your criminal lies) to get along (with you, the extortive criminal) in agreeing that you're a perpetually helpless victim, "too." So as long as everyone else in your newly-formed victim-identity gang also agrees that everyone else in the gang is an equally-helpless fellow victim, they get to avoid being labelled as part of the oppressor group you can now all vilify and extort (as "intolerant hateful racist bigots," etc.)!

While all criminals are hypocrites and vice-versa, not all criminals are gangsters (but it's very unusual for them to not at least show a token support for one or more other criminal victimal gangs, as a sort of insurance excuse, just in case)!



For instance, "poverty" is a relative, subjective term, not rooted in any factual, universally objective truth - so, since it can't ever really be defined, it also cannot ever really be "eradicated." Therefore, the ACTUAL LAW concerning the licensing of charities in Canada, openly states that one cannot be accredited if one promises to SOLVE THE PROBLEM. In this way, the Canadian "law" itself openly endorses and indeed enforces criminal "no money in solutions" negligence.

Now, naturally, one could posit that real poverty only exists when one cannot maintain a basic survival subsistence level, but then the victimology and hurt feelings industry gangs take over, demanding "dignity" and "respect" and all the other attendant subjective idolatry to be "equally" applied to all, too - basically demanding a criminal right to an equality of (externally inflicted inevitable force) outcome over an equality of (self-regulated free-will choice reliant) opportunity.


Currently, the entire academic field of psychology is merely a myth and a fantasy. The premises on which it is based are entirely wrong, considering there has been no due diligence done to correctly categorize and define its most basic terms: emotions. There is a real underlying logical and reasonable method to the apparent madness, but none of the self-professed "expert authorities" who have conned governments into granting them their exclusive imprimaturs have bothered to look for it, not only because as usual their motto seems to be "There's No Money In Solutions," but also, and because of their own arrogance, they haven't even been able to consider that they have been so negligent as to have missed something so basic.


People who are too cowardly to face, identify, and oppose the real threat always end up "failing upwards" simply because "there's no money in solutions!"


Evading fear increases parasitism and corrupts society.

To put it in more complex, "academic" terms:

When one wants pleasure without pain and fear, and rights to same without the responsibility for having earned them, one must oppose and ignore cause and effect. Ignoring cause and effect means refusing to perceive and detect dynamic actions, in favour of static pre-conceptions. It means killing thoughts to favour pre-conceived, pre-judiced biases ("psycopathy").o choose such excuse-making images over reality, such subjectively opinionated empty forms and formalities over any and all substantive universally objective rationality, reasons and facts, is what defines the literally pathological idolater. It's a process of wishful, magical thinking, and it usually relies on trying to force reality to bend to the fantasy, and as such engages in an increasing scale of group-might-made rights practices as manipulation/coercion/extortion/terrorism. The final failed fascist fantasy is always that force (including government force) can be used to change inconvenient facts - that people can vote to change the truth into their favourite lies - which, again, is always that they can have rights to pleasure without having to deal with any painful responsibilities of having to pay for or otherwise earn it; equality of outcome over equality of opportunity.

To put it in less complex, non-academic terms:

All excuse-making criminals are cowards.

"Psychotic, paranoid masochist hypocrites" always project: "I couldn't be responsible to myself or anyone else, because I was afraid - and I alone feel fear! (OK, if and when you're willing to indulge my excuse, you can share in it: "we all do it, too!") Whee!"

Even putting this cowardice into "psychological" (mental illness) terms, is to give in to one of their favorite excuses:

"I didn't do it! My brain made me do it! And in fact, I didn't do it at all! Only my brain did it! Whee!"

Therefore it's plain to see that all thought-killing, emotional-excuse-making, fear-focused cowardly criminal "psychotics" (aka "paranoid" "masochists" and "conflicted, cognitively dissonant, bi-polar manic-depressive hypocrites") are cowards.


The very dictionary definition of "Psycho-paths" is simply "thought-killers." It's not something only a trained expert medical authority can diagnose and therapeutically treat but never cure (because to such criminal negligents, the motto is always "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - Again!")! Anyone who can do it easily understands it.

All psychopaths are masochists and all masochists are psychopaths. Masochists aren't brave pain-lovers at all - they are cowards who only inflict pain on themselves to cancel what they consider as the additional pains called fears or "Fear."

But one's thoughts prioritize fears, not, as these psychotic masochists or masochistically psychotics choose to see them, as externally-generated inflictions of additional pains, but as internally-generated helpful warnings, to be heeded and used to avoid future pain-causing damage.

Their chosen view is simply one of permanent fear aka "paranoia." And since one's thoughts prioritize fear in order to earn hope, what these people who choose, in stead, to fear not the causes of their fears, but "only" the fear itself, are really trying to do is to kill off their thoughts.

Pretending it's smart to kill off one's thoughts is the most basic and blatant example of sheerest hypocrisy, yet that - and only that - is what every delinquent criminally negligent libertine "liberal" does all the time anyway: "Whee."

Even worse: "fascism" (communazi totalitarianism, collectivist conformity, i.e: total control aka slavery) always automatically results from group-might-made-rights to be pitied instead of scorned: in pretending they can't control them selves, excuse-making criminals must also "logically" insist that, ("since we, i.e: you, all do it, too") as nobody else can control them selves either, then they ("we") all must be controlled by other people (i.e: by "me")!

So, by pretending they can't control them selves, they also pretend they "must" try to control everyone else instead! In public, they always endorse useless pity over useful anger because it's less risky. But give them a large enough gang to dilute their own culpability and risk, while increasing their power to extort, and they will also advocate for anger at those who would be angry at such criminals for committing their crimes.

See "islam" for the "best" example of this.

Monday, November 26, 2018


Re: "The Canadian media should think long and hard before selling its soul to Trudeau."

But "THINKING" isn't something such presstitutes normally do, is it?


YES, all liberals/socialists/communists (and muslims, nazis, etc) are "TOTALITARIANS."
And what does that mean? Simple! It means they want TOTAL control over everyone else.
In other words, they are wannabe slavers. And to achieve that gang-might-made-right utopia (where they have all the rights and no responsibilities, and everyone else has no right to defend themselves from their "expert authority,"  but only a responsibility to become and remain their slaves) they need to form into ever-larger gangs. And why are they like this? Because they are scared little weenies and bullies who always blame everyone and everyone else for their own fears, seeing them not as internally generated helpful warnings to aid them in avoiding future mistakes and problems which cause pain-causing damage - but as additional externally-generated pains, to be ignored opposed and attacked. Since thinking prioritizes pain and fear in order to earn hope, they fear the scary dynamics of thinking itself, in both them selves and in all others. Hence, "psycho-paths" are literally thought-killers, always trying to impose new restrictions on everyone else. They form and join ever-larger gangs (leading to globalism) to go along (with criminal lies and extortion aka political correctness) to get along (with all the other scary criminal extortionists) simply because they are too scared not to.



Friday, November 2, 2018

Silly Peons! Democracy Is For Democrats!

From here:

Doting on voting

Every time Americans head for the polls, I recall that the word holiday descends from “holy day.” Elections don’t yet meet the dictionary’s definition of holiday (an occasion “fixed by law or custom on which ordinary business is suspended in commemoration of some event…”) since only a few places in the Land of the Formerly Free “suspend” “ordinary business.” But count on Tuesday’s inspiring an almost religious fervor in those who idolize the State.

You can spot these devotees a mile away. They endlessly prattle that voting is not only our “right” but our “duty.” They wax misty-eyed at the legions who supposedly died to secure this privilege, then hector us to fulfill our alleged obligation. They produce hagiographic movies as well as pictorial compilations lauding America’s suffragists (it goes without saying that this propaganda never treats men well or even fairly). They mistake the Voting Rights Act of 1965 for Holy Writ. With women and blacks conquered, they tirelessly seek more prey, striving to enfranchise everyone, citizen or not, regardless of age. You and I may fantasize about an upcoming vacation or dinner with our spouse at that new Greek place; they lust to “[Tell] Americans to Vote, or Else.”

In short, the ballot is as sacred in statists’ eyes as Communion’s chalice is to Christians.

I suspect their harping and appeals to guilt succeed far more with Progressives than they do with patriots. The latter may agree that “good” citizens vote. But they also pull the levers from terror — and rightly so — at the wickedness that Progressives implement when their candidates win office. Proof of this theory resides in the White House: though Trump only occasionally flirts with conservative principles, he did save us from Hildebeast.

Either way, far too many Americans venerate voting. They have not only embraced the Marxist doctrine of civil rights with its sacrament–sorry, its requirement to vote, they have swapped the Founders’ severely restricted government for this abomination. Voting is as significant as Progressives proclaim, but it shouldn’t be. And our emphasis on it testifies to the despotism consuming us.

Under the Founders’ vision of minuscule, enervated government, politicians would hardly ever impinge on our lives (and bureaucrats never would, as none would exist). Our rights would be fixed, immutable and sacrosanct. Ninety-nine percent of our neighbors could disapprove of our collecting rifles or, if we owned a complex of apartments, of our refusal to rent to sodomites, but they could never enshrine their pique legally. Our freedom to keep and bear under the Second Amendment and to associate as we please under the First would be absolute.

But the Progressive regime tyrannizing us compels us to vote from self-defense. Whether you’re on the right or the left, you genuinely and reasonably fear the harm to you, your family and livelihood when the opposition gains more power.

Contrast that horror with the Founders’ Constitutional Republic, in which the occupants of elective office wouldn’t matter much — and neither would the voting that puts them there — because officials would exercise little power. Aside from declaring wars of offense, the political class could only rarely hurt us.

How unspeakably tragic, then, that Americans long ago abandoned the Constitution’s protection from politicians. Instead, with government insinuating itself so thoroughly in our lives, we vote in desperate hope of limiting the damage.

No wonder politicians destroyed the Founders’ republic for a democratic dystopia that empowers them. Yes, the ghosts of that republic still flit along the periphery of the public square. But they increasingly flee before the dictatorship of the mob, aka., “democracy.” The idea that government’s one and only job is to protect our political liberty expired well over a century ago; instead, its leeches sponsor legislation based on an issue’s publicity (which they’ve often carefully ginned up beforehand) and its resulting popularity. And even that democracy isn’t direct enough: hence the rise of “propositions,” “ballot initiatives,” “school levies” and other ploys, whereby our friends and family decree which of our inalienable rights the State may alienate and how much of our money it will steal.

Voting legitimizes these evils and many more. By casting a ballot, victims tacitly agree that the State should reign over them. They unwittingly cooperate with their predators to change the question from whether Leviathan may manage our lives to how.

Meanwhile, rank-and-file Progressives sincerely revere voting: witness our friend who “celebrates democracy” by closing his business on Election Day. But their leaders must cynically guffaw. The franchise is a charade — and an incredibly expensive one (almost $5.2 billion for 2018’s federal race alone). Ballots offer no real choice: 90 percent of incumbents return to office, over and over, until they choose not to; we seldom ever determine their tenure. And of course, victors hailing from parties other than the two major ones are as scarce as honest politicians. In fact, the Demopublicans constructed the electoral apparatus precisely to exclude all other contenders while entrenching themselves in power.

Turns out they needn’t have bothered. A study a few years ago confirmed what we have long suspected: the hoi polloi exert virtually no influence over the rulers sponging off them. Two professors analyzed graphs and charts and statistics to declare, “When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.” Whether you protest, sign petitions or vote, you’re wasting your time. The political class designs domestic and international policies to further their power and interests without regard to ours.

We who love liberty can debate the tactics of voting. Some of us never grace the State’s little booths, while others view their ballot as a weapon against encroaching totalitarianism. But we can all concur that Marxists have hyped this minor act as much as they’ve spit on the Constitution.
Becky Akers is a freelance writer and historian who publishes so voluminously that whole forests of gigabytes have died. You’ve heard of some of the publications that carry her work (Personal Liberty Digest, Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post, Barron’s, New York Post); others can only wish you’d heard of them. She’s also written two novels of the American Revolution, Halestorm and Abducting Arnold. They advocate sedition and liberty, among other joys, so the wise reader will buy them now, before they’re banned.

Thursday, November 1, 2018

Mueller-Connected Boston Mobster Whitey Bulger Killed in Prison… As He Was About to Out FBI Officials

From here and here:

Mueller-Connected Boston Mobster Whitey Bulger Killed in Prison… As He Was About to Out Mueller FBI Officials

89-year-old Boston mob boss James ‘Whitey’ Bulger was killed in prison by a ‘fellow inmate with mafia ties’ shortly after he was transferred to a West Virginia federal prison.

Bulger was reportedly wheeled away from security cameras and beaten with a lock in a sock and also had his eyes gouged out.

Sources told The Daily Mail that Whitey Bulger was about to out people in the FBI, specifically FBI officials of the informant program.

Via The Daily Mail:
Boston gangster James ‘Whitey’ Bulger Jr. has been killed behind bars shortly after he was transferred to a federal prison in West Virginia. He was 89.
Bulger was found dead overnight on Tuesday at USP Hazelton, a high-security prison with an adjacent minimum security satellite camp in Bruceton Mills.
It emerged in Bulger’s 2013 trial that he had served as an FBI informant as far back as 1975, though he always denied the claim.
Law enforcement sources tell that Whitey had been talking about outing people in the FBI – people in the top echelon of the informant program.
The sources said he hadn’t even been processed at the West Virginia facility when he was killed. But someone who knew he was being transferred put the word out – the killer had to know he was coming.

The Whitey Bulger-Robert Mueller connection:


In May, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) published a 48-page report called “Robert Mueller Unmasked” to expose the Special Counsel’s decades of corruption.

In the extensive report, Gohmert covered Mueller’s shady past of helping mobster Whitey Bulger by eliminating mob competitors.

The Boston Globe noted Robert Mueller’s connection with the Whitey Bulger case in an article entitled, “One Lingering Question for FBI Director Robert Mueller.” The Globe said this:
“[Mike] Albano [former Parole Board Member who was threatened by two F.B.I. agents for considering parole for the men imprisoned for a crime they did not commit] was appalled that, later that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as an assistant US attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies. Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset…”
Mueller put people in prison for crimes they did not commit:
“Mueller was the head of the Criminal Division as Assistant U.S. Attorney, then as Acting U.S. Attorney. I could not find any explanation online by Mueller as to why he insisted on keeping the defendants in prison that FBI agents—in the pocket of Whitey Bulger—had framed for a murder they did not commit. Make no mistake: these were not honorable people he had incarcerated. But it was part of a pattern that eventually became quite clear that Mueller was more concerned with convicting and putting people in jail he disliked, even if they were innocent of the charges, than he was with ferreting out the truth,” Gohmert said.
The Special Counsel learned last week of an alleged scheme to pay off women to fabricate sexual assault allegations against Mueller.

This week, Mueller unleashed the power of the government and referred the scheme to the FBI.

Whitey Bulger, a mob boss with a long history with Mueller was also murdered in prison this week–interesting string of events connected to Mueller are all unfolding at once.