Saturday, December 29, 2018

Angela Merkel: Nation States Must ‘Give Up Sovereignty’ To New World Order

From here:

Nation states must today be prepared to give up their sovereignty”, according to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who told an audience in Berlin that sovereign nation states must not listen to the will of their citizens when it comes to questions of immigration, borders, or even sovereignty.

No this wasn’t something Adolf Hitler said many decades ago, this is what German Chancellor Angela Merkel told attendants at an event by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Berlin. Merkel has announced she won’t seek re-election in 2021 and it is clear she is attempting to push the globalist agenda to its disturbing conclusion before she stands down.

In an orderly fashion of course,” Merkel joked, attempting to lighten the mood. But Merkel has always had a tin ear for comedy and she soon launched into a dark speech condemning those in her own party who think Germany should have listened to the will of its citizens and refused to sign the controversial UN migration pact:

There were [politicians] who believed that they could decide when these agreements are no longer valid because they are representing The People”.

[But] the people are individuals who are living in a country, they are not a group who define themselves as the [German] people,” she stressed.

Merkel has previously accused critics of the UN Global Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration of not being patriotic, saying “That is not patriotism, because patriotism is when you include others in German interests and accept win-win situations”.
Angela Merkel as Chancellor of Germany has embraced globalist ideology by opening the nations borders, accepting millions of migrants.

‘One world government’

Her words echo recent comments by the deeply unpopular French President Emmanuel Macron who stated in a Remembrance Day speech that “patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism [because] nationalism is treason.”

The French president’s words were deeply unpopular with the French population and his approval rating nosedived even further after the comments.

Macron, whose lack of leadership is proving unable to deal with growing protests in France, told the Bundestag that France and Germany should be at the center of the emerging New World Order.
The Franco-German couple [has]the obligation not to let the world slip into chaos and to guide it on the road to peace”.

Europe must be stronger… and win more sovereignty,” he went on to demand, just like Merkel, that EU member states surrender national sovereignty to Brussels over “foreign affairs, migration, and development” as well as giving “an increasing part of our budgets and even fiscal resources”.

Friday, December 28, 2018

YAY SLOVAKS! Muslims Butthurt as Slovakians BAN ISLAM!

From here:

The ongoing and increasing effort to criminalise Islam throughout Europe, a continent that prides itself on being a bastion of liberal and pluralistic values, operates under many guises and covert methods, all of which have a singular purpose: To make life as difficult for Muslims as lawfully possible.

European parliaments are legalising Islamophobia at breakneck speeds, with European citizens becoming increasingly fixated on what Muslims can and cannot wear in public.

Consider that France became the first to ban the Islamic face veil in 2011, but since then only six of the 28 EU countries haven't considered banning headscarves and face veils, those six being Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Poland, Portugal and Romania.


Countries that have passed general national laws that criminalise wearing the face veil include France, Belgium, Bulgaria, and Austria, while Denmark and Spain have enacted bans in specific public settings or sectors, according to a recent report by Open Society Foundation.

All of this is taking place as far-right political parties and movements spread throughout Europe at rate alarmingly similar to the Nazi military in the late 1930s to early 1940s.
Moreover, some European states are going even further than France, Belgium, Denmark and others in their respective efforts to stifle and repress the rights of Muslim minorities and expression of the Islamic faith.

Slovakia, for instance, recently passed a law that effectively outlaws Islam for the foreseeable future and/or forever.
Given Muslims represent only 0.4 percent of the population, Slovakia's anti-Islam law represents a solution to a problem that doesn't exist
The bill changed a pre-existing law that stated a religion must attain 20,000 followers (signatures) before it can be considered a state religion.

Without that legal status, a religion is deemed unlawful by the state, deeming it ineligible for government tax subsidies, while, at the same time, forbidding public houses of worship. The new law, however, doubled the threshold from 25,000 to 50,000 signatures.

Given Muslims represent only 0.4 percent of the population, Slovakia's anti-Islam law represents a solution to a problem that doesn't exist, but Slovak politicians haven't tried to conceal their motive behind this bill. In fact, they have publicly stated it's intended to outlaw all aspects of Muslim life in the country forever.

"Islamisation starts with a kebab and it's already under way in Bratislava, let's realise what we will face in five to 10 years," said Slovak National Party (SNP) chairman Andrej Danko in an interview with Reuters. "We must do everything we can so that no mosque is built in the future."

As it stands, there are roughly 5,000 Muslims in Slovakia, but not a single mosque. This law restricts the day-to-day life of Slovak Muslims in very harmful and repressive ways. Not only are they denied basic rights regarding freedom of speech and expression, but also they can't have religious leaders, perform Islamic marriages, nor can they receive funding or assistance from the government, unlike the members of 18 other registered religions in the country.
"As Muslims, we do really need to be recognised and to have a feeling that we are well accepted and well integrated by the government, by the society. We as Muslims, we are citizens. We have, beside our duties, also some rights," said Mohamad Safwan Hasna, chairman of Islamic Foundation Slovakia, in a recent interview with TRT World.
Moreover, failing to recognise Islam as a religion means schools are not allowed to teach their students about the religious faith and/or the contributions Muslims have made towards technology, medicine, philosophy and the natural sciences, which also denies students being knowledgeable about the historical presence of Muslims in Slovakia.

"There is no mention of the contribution of Arabic travel books to the reconstruction of the history of Central and Eastern Europe in the early middle Ages," observes Jozef Lenc and Monika Zavis, Slovakian authors of a recent report into Islamophobia in Slovakia.

"In Slovakia, we do not even teach anything about the Muslim communities of early Hungary (for example, around Nitra) or the contributions of the Tatars, who settled in the territory of today's Poland, Lithuania and Belarus, to the Polish army and society."
This climate of anti-Muslim animus is urging Slovak politicians to expand the 2017 bill by more than quadrupling the number of signatures required to attain status as a legal religion
This, according to Lenc and Zavis, is creating the intellectual space for Islamophobia to thrive and proliferate, which also creates space for political entrepreneurs, particularly on the right, to exploit and mobilise a political base.

For instance, a prominent Member of Parliament, Stanislav Mizik, recently stated, "Every normal European, Christian or atheist, has to fear this satanic-paedophile creation of the devil, which is the religion of Islam."

Of course, like everywhere else, seemingly, Slovak media also helps perpetuate negative stereotypes about Muslims and disinformation about Islam, and in particular has further fueled ill feeling towards the country's tiny Muslim minority.

Read more: Love, politics and patriarchy: British Muslim women are taking back their narrative

"Most often Islam is associated with terrorism - in fact all Slovak media use the word 'jihad' as a synonym for 'terrorism,' and 'jihadists' as a synonym for 'terrorists.' This creates a societal image that all Muslims who act as jihadists are terrorists, and that terrorism in the form of jihad is a part of Islam," observe Lenc and Zavis.

This climate of anti-Muslim animus is urging Slovak politicians to expand the 2017 bill by more than quadrupling the number of signatures required to attain status as a legal religion, but even more concerning is the fact that hate crimes against Muslims in Slovakia are on the rise, like pretty much everywhere else across the continent.
They are creating the intellectual space for Islamophobia to thrive and proliferate
At the heart of these European anti-Muslim laws is the fear of terrorism, with right-wing politicians foolishly and dangerously espousing the misguided notion that being tough on Muslims will defeat "Islamic" terrorism, despite the fact that counterterrorism academics and practitioners contend the exact opposite - that social cohesion, pluralism, equality and inclusion are the enemies of violent extremism.

Slovakia, unfortunately, is yet another example of a modern European state falling victim to the worse impulses and imaginary of fears of a more virulent and threatening far-right.

CJ Werleman is the author of 'Crucifying America', 'God Hates You, Hate Him Back' and 'Koran Curious', and is the host of Foreign Object.

Follow him on Twitter: @cjwerleman

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

The Federal Reserve is a suicide bomber with a deeper agenda

(From Persona Liberty Media's Bob Livingston Alerts)

Central bankers are sociopathic in nature and sociopathic people behave like robots. When one understands the motivations of central bankers, or at the very least what their goals are, their actions become rather predictable. The question is, what truly motivates these people?

I believe according to the evidence that the central banks are motivated by ideological zealotry, with the core purpose of total global centralization of economic and political power into the hands of a select group of elitists. This agenda is really just a modern "reboot" of feudalism or totalitarianism. They sometimes refer to the plan in public as the "new world order," or the "global economic reset." I often refer to the encompassing ideology as "globalism" for the sake of expediency.

To attain this goal, central bankers must influence mass psychology using traumatic events. Fear opens doors to centralization of power. This is simply a societal fact. The more afraid a population is, the more willing they will be to give up freedoms in exchange for safety and security. Therefore, the most effective weapon at the disposal of the globalists and their central banking counterparts is engineered economic crisis — a weapon that can, if allowed, destroy entire civilizations almost as fast as a nuclear war, while still keeping most of the expensive infrastructure intact.

Beyond that, economic crisis is also a weapon that can influence a population to embrace even greater enslavement and see their slave masters as saviors rather than villains.

Central bankers are not driven by desire for profit, despite the assumptions of many people. They print their own capital, they hardly need to make a profit. Central bankers are also not driven by a desire to keep the current system afloat. They have demonstrated time and time again their habit of deliberately sabotaging the system through the use of inflationary bubbles followed by fiscal tightening into weak economic conditions. The U.S. economy is just as expendable as any other economy the banks have destroyed in the past. It is not special.

This fact is becoming extremely clear today, as the Federal Reserve initiates policy tightening measures which are crashing stock markets as well as destabilizing other sectors of the economy including housing markets, auto markets and credit markets.

As noted, this was highly predictable. In September of 2015 I published an article titled 'The Real Reasons Why The Fed Will Hike Interest Rates', predicting that the strategy the banks would use to bring about the next crisis would be interest rate hikes into economic weakness. This was the same strategy they used to initiate the Great Depression. And as mentioned earlier, sociopaths act like robots — they tend to use similar tactics over and over again because they have worked in the past.

At the time, the vast majority of analysts were predicting that the central banks would move towards negative interest rates. But if the goal of the banking elites is total centralization of the global economy, then keeping the U.S. system alive for another decade or longer makes little sense. They had already created the perfect financial bubble using QE and near zero interest rates to encourage debt accumulation at historic levels. It's a veritable economic atomic bomb, why not use it?

At the beginning of this year, I published an article titled 'New Fed Chairman Will Trigger A Historic Stock Market Crash In 2018'. In that article, I predicted that Jerome Powell would push forward with interest rate hikes and balance sheet cuts. This would put too much pressure on highly indebted corporations and they would be forced to stop spending capital on stock buybacks, which have been propping up equities for several years.

I would point out that not only has Powell in fact done exactly what I predicted, but that he has done it consciously, knowing what the results would be. In 2012, Powell outlined the exact consequences of policy tightening in the Fed October minutes. These minutes were not made public until recently. They prove that the Fed is fully aware of what it is doing, not acting blindly.

In September of this year, in my article 'The Everything Bubble: When Will It Finally Crash?', I predicted that stock markets would begin crashing in December of 2018, despite many skeptics arguing that a "Santa Claus rally" was guaranteed. From the article:

"The Fed's tightening policies have resulted in a severe reaction by emerging markets which are already crashing and have diverged greatly from U.S. markets. American stocks will not escape the same fate.

The Fed's neutral rate efforts suggest a turning point in late 2018 to early 2019. Balance sheet cuts are expected to increase at this time, which would also expedite a crash in existing market assets. The only question is how long can corporations sustain stock buybacks until their own debt burdens crush their efforts? With such companies highly leveraged, interest rates will determine the length of their resolve. I believe two more hikes will be their limit.

If the Fed continues on its current path the next stock crash would begin around December 2018 into the first quarter of 2019. After that, other sectors of the economy, already highly unstable, will break down through 2019 and 2020."

Though stock buybacks had saved markets from the plunge in February, they are long gone in the final quarter as the cost of corporate debt expands. Stocks are now in near free fall in December. The crash of the "everything bubble" has begun.

I was able to predict this outcome because I am willing as an analyst to accept certain realities. The most important being that at this stage the Fed does not care about propping up the U.S. economy, and ultimately, the Fed does not even care what happens to itself as an institution. The truth is that the Fed is working towards an ideological end game of global centralization; this means one economy, one currency and eventually one world government. It has no loyalty to the U.S. system, and it will destroy the U.S. system if it must to achieve this prize.

Far too many people wrongly assume that the Fed is the apex of globalist power. The Fed is nothing more than a single tentacle of a greater vampire squid. It is the branch of a franchise, not the top of the pyramid.

I would liken the Fed to a saboteur and a suicide bomber. It was sent here to America with the explicit goal of undermining the U.S. economy and the U.S. currency over the period of a century in preparation for a final destructive act which would open the path to global centralization. It was sent here in disguise, to get close to the target, to explode our economy. Its job is to do as much damage as possible, even to the point of sacrificing itself. When the dust settles, other globalist institutions plan to move in to pick up the pieces and offer the desperate citizenry a pre-designed solution.

At this time, ending the Fed is still necessary as a symbolic act, but strategically it would be useless in saving the economy. The Fed has already accomplished its mission.

Our focus now must be to determine who rebuilds the system after the crash runs its course. This means preventing global central bank hubs like the IMF or the BIS from becoming the dominant economic force in the world. It means a long and arduous struggle. It means defiant structures — localized economies and production, self reliant people providing their own necessities and engaging in trade, and communities formed around mutual aid and security. It means a fight is coming that goes beyond the information war.

To truth and knowledge,

Brandon Smith

Monday, December 17, 2018

Die-Versity Rules!

From Someone Who Is Not Me - But Who Often Makes a Good Point Anyway.


Find literally anything that makes the world safer and more harmonious, and not far behind, you will discover a Leftist trying to destroy it.

This is of course paved over with fluffy sentiments of peace, love, and tolerance. They don’t want to exterminate White people, they just want diversity and the end of “hate”. They don’t want to stop people from breeding, they just want equality for women, homosexuals, and suicidal freaks. They don’t want rampant crime on the streets, they just want to rid the world of gun violence and police brutality. They don’t hate energy, they just want to outlaw it in the hopes that solar powered airplanes will spontaneously emerge once they do.

So for the uninitiated, it might seem like they have truly good intentions, even if their deeds are misguided.

Every now and then though, you get a glimpse of how they really feel. Such was the case today with a piece in the New York Times titled “Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

The author of the piece, Todd May, a professor of philosophy at Clemson University, does his best to say no without coming across like a complete psychopath. To accomplish this, he defines tragedy thusly “In theater, the tragic character is often someone who commits a wrong, usually a significant one, but with whom we feel sympathy in their descent.” In this case, “It is humanity that is committing a wrong, a wrong whose elimination would likely require the elimination of the species, but with whom we might be sympathetic nonetheless for reasons I discuss in a moment.”
The wrong of course, is that we are hurting the Earth. Climate change, population growth, and factory farming are his primary complaints, which he concludes make us responsible for more suffering and destruction than any other species. Our only saving grace, thing thing which makes our extinction the limited tragedy it is, is that we have art and science. However, the art is clearly of less importance to Mr. May than the suffering we inflict on animals.
So, then, how much suffering and death of nonhuman life would we be willing to countenance to save Shakespeare, our sciences and so forth? Unless we believe there is such a profound moral gap between the status of human and nonhuman animals, whatever reasonable answer we come up with will be well surpassed by the harm and suffering we inflict upon animals. There is just too much torment wreaked upon too many animals and too certain a prospect that this is going to continue and probably increase; it would overwhelm anything we might place on the other side of the ledger.
Fear not though, fellow humans, though Mr. May views your life as no more valuable than that of a cockroach, he does not want you to kill yourself or be exterminated from the Earth. This, I’m sure, makes him feel as though he is not advocating for the genocide of all humanity. Rather, he only wishes for future humans to not be born.
One might ask here whether, given this view, it would also be a good thing for those of us who are currently here to end our lives in order to prevent further animal suffering. Although I do not have a final answer to this question, we should recognize that the case of future humans is very different from the case of currently existing humans. To demand of currently existing humans that they should end their lives would introduce significant suffering among those who have much to lose by dying. In contrast, preventing future humans from existing does not introduce such suffering, since those human beings will not exist and therefore not have lives to sacrifice. The two situations, then, are not analogous.
Remember this when they tell you how wonderful Planned Parenthood is, how “reproductive rights” are synonymous with birth control and abortion, how homosexuality and transgenderism are perfectly reasonable things to teach prepubescent children.

Perhaps you think him to be a one off nut who happened to get published in the paper of record as a fluke. No threat to the survival of the species for sure. No way some shoddy opinion piece in a communist propaganda rag would stop humanity from reproducing itself, right?

Well, of course not. Most of the human race would not dream of reading this drivel, much less sterilizing themselves to act on it, but that is primarily because most of humanity is not white, and does not care much for the suffering of animals or the broader plight of non-human life. The only people who would even consider such things are White people, and as we have seen from the Times over, and over, and over again, we are the target of their enmity.

With this and the backdrop of immigration policy in mind, consider the “Tragedy in Mouse Utopia“. Scientists conducted an experiment where mice were given all the food, water, and bedding they could ever possibly desire. A population boom predictably ensues, but after several generations, the habitat becomes exceedingly crowded. The result being that male mice become savagely violent and females fail to nurture their young. The subsequent generation became known as the “beautiful ones” – non-violent but interested in little else other than grooming themselves. These mice were unable to interact socially with one another and had no interest in sex, leading to the extinction of the population. Even when this traumatized generation was removed from the stress of their surroundings, they still did not recover and lived out their days in solitude, fixated on grooming.

The process was irreversible.

And so it goes, that the only demographic with any interest in controlling their breeding fades from the Earth, and the savages who remain care not for the suffering of others. Will this result in the animal Utopia the author envisions? Of course not.

Once we are gone, and the benefits we bring to the world die with us, the savages will thin their numbers to a sustainable level through violence and inability to sustain the lifesaving systems we had established. So as long as one sees no difference between the races, the human race will survive in harmony with the Earth, finally reaching the equality with other animals these monsters have sought all along. But at least white people, with our energy, our farms, and our lifesaving technologies will be eliminated, and that’s all anybody at the Times really cares about.

Friday, December 14, 2018


From here:

Trade war distraction: Huawei and linchpin theory

Since the beginning of this year, I have been warning that trade tariffs initiated by Donald Trump would develop into a full-blown trade war with China, and perhaps other nations, and that the timing of this trade war is rather suspicious. Suspicious how? Almost every instance of further escalation was made by Trump around the exact time that the Federal Reserve was also making a large cut to its balance sheet or raising interest rates. Instead of focusing on the fact that extreme volatility has returned to markets because central banks are pulling the plug on life support, the mainstream media is holding up the trade war as the ultimate culprit behind the accelerating crash.

In other words, Trump’s trade war is acting as a perfect distraction from the crisis which the banking establishment has now deliberately triggered.

The initial response to my suggestion by a minority of liberty movement activists and skeptics was outright denial. Some people argued that the trade war would be over before it even began and that China would immediately capitulate in fear of losing the U.S. consumer market. Others argued that the trade war “had been started by the Chinese years ago” and Trump was simply “fighting back.”

Clearly, the trade war is not fading away as many wrongly assumed. As I predicted, it is only continuing to grow. And the notion that a trade war is necessary at this time in defense of the U.S. economy ignores certain realities. For example, the trade deficit itself was never “theft” by the Chinese, but a trade between the Chinese and the U.S. government and U.S. corporations. In exchange for the Chinese and other trade partners using the dollar as the world reserve currency (and petro-currency), U.S. elites have arranged a deficit advantage for China. One could also add China’s cheap labor and low cost manufactured goods as part of that trade as well.

While the American working class got the short end of the stick in this deal, the government and the corporate cabal certainly benefited.

Now, if Trump had pressured corporations to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. in order to reap the rewards of his tax cuts, tariffs after the fact might make a little more sense. With production back on U.S. soil we would have more economic stability to weather future crisis events. Instead, Trump gave corporations a tax cut for nothing. And instead of using that extra capital to innovate or add value to the real economy, companies used the money to continue artificially propping up their own stock prices through stock buybacks.

It should be obvious to most people at this point that Trump has no intention of “winning” the trade war. As I noted just after the G-20 conference and the dinner negotiations with China:

“Of course, the outcome is being touted by both sides as a “win,” but it is clear that the goal was to head fake the public rather than actually resolve trade disputes. Will the 90-day delay be seen as “good for markets?” Possibly. Though, the housing market, auto market, and credit markets will continue to crash as they have been for the past few months. I expect this development might buy stocks another week of rest, but little else. As the next Fed meeting approaches this month and it becomes clear that they intend to continue hiking rates into 2019, the false optimism will fade. I also expect that negotiations with China will fall apart yet again well before the 90-day delay is over…”

This is exactly what has happened, though the G-20 honeymoon ended even faster than I imagined.

The arrest of Chinese CFO of Huawei Technologies, Meng Wanzhou, has immediately destroyed any possibility of diplomatic negotiations going forward. The 90 day “truce” set apparently by verbal agreement during G-20 is likely over mere days after it started. National Security adviser and CFR ghoul John Bolton admitted in an interview with NPR that he was aware that Canada was preparing to arrest Meng at the request of the U.S. while he was eating grilled sirloin with the Chinese. The claim that Trump was not aware of the situation, to me, sounds absurd.

The detainment of Meng comes with a host of significant potential consequences. First, as noted the trade truce is likely dead on arrival. Second, the possibility of further escalation of tariffs is much higher (U.S. farmers should not expect a reprieve anytime soon). Third, there is a chance that China will retaliate by snatching up U.S. corporate representatives. This is a development I realize the average liberty activist could not care less about, but the average American will see such actions as a slight by the Chinese against the U.S. as a whole. Thus, the false East/West paradigm is further entrenched in the American mindset.

If this trend continues, the trade war will eventually expand into a war on the U.S. dollar itself, and when it does, the U.S. will suffer the worst fiscal crisis in its history. Without the world reserve status of the dollar as well as continued foreign investment in U.S. debt, what’s left of our economy will disintegrate, and I believe this is part of the plan.

Meng’s arrest is a deliberately engineered “linchpin.” I have written extensively in past articles on DARPA’s “linchpin theory,” which is a kind of propaganda exercise more than a theory. According to DARPA, overly complex systems invite growing instability, and like a chain of dominoes, the smallest part of that system could be knocked over by a minor event causing a chain reaction that ends in total collapse.

Of course, this is a misrepresentation of reality. Complex systems do not invite instability, they create redundancy, making the system stronger and more resistant to disasters. Instability is actually caused by oversimplification of a system; that is to say, centralization is the true cause of large-scale crisis. As we have seen time and time again with globalism, the more economically interdependent and centralized the world becomes, the more vulnerable each nation is to the calamities of other nations.

DARPA loves centralization and is certainly not going to point a finger at it as the cause of global distress. And so they have created a scapegoat of decentralization through linchpin theory.

Linchpin theory also asserts another lie — the lie that most disasters are a product of “random chance.” The problem is that the only way that linchpin theory works is if disasters are created through conspiracy, not coincidence.

A system must be purposely weakened over time to the point that any crisis will translate into a collapse of the entire edifice. Central banks have done this quite expertly through the use of debt-based bubbles, followed by fiscal tightening into economic weakness. When you build up an economy like a great Jenga tower and begin pulling the most vital pieces in a calculated manner, eventually it’s going to come crashing down.

So which piece represents the supposed “linchpin” in our system today? Well, any piece might do the trick, but the arrest of a Chinese corporate executive (which the Chinese will consider hostage taking) at the very onset of a fragile trade truce is an excellent catalyst and also an excellent distraction.
In my article ‘The Everything Bubble: When Will It Finally Crash?’ published in September, I predicted that:

“The Fed’s neutral rate efforts suggest a turning point in late 2018 to early 2019. Balance sheet cuts are expected to increase at this time, which would also expedite a crash in existing market assets. The only question is how long can corporations sustain stock buybacks until their own debt burdens crush their efforts? With such companies highly leveraged, interest rates will determine the length of their resolve. I believe two more hikes will be their limit.

If the Fed continues on its current path the next stock crash would begin around December 2018 into the first quarter of 2019.”

The timing of the arrest of Meng coincided perfectly with the Fed’s expanded balance sheet cuts. The fed has now shifted from $30 billion per month to $50 billion per month in dumped assets. The Fed is also set to raise interest rates to meet the neutral rate of inflation this month. This is something that has not happened in decades. And corporate stock buybacks are dying in the last quarter of 2018, as the cost of borrowing to prop up equities is now too high. In response, stock markets are beginning to plunge, and this time there will be no significant bounce back because without Fed stimulus or buybacks, there is nothing left to keep things afloat.

To reiterate, the trade war is hitting a nexus, a point of extreme escalation just as the central bankers are about to kill the U.S. economy by tightening into economic weakness. The Meng snafu will be used by the mainstream media to draw the public’s attention away from central bank activities and toward the trade war. Everything Trump is doing is helping the banks to hide their culpability for the crash.

Why do the banking elites want a crash in the U.S.? There are numerous reasons and gains to be had. For an in-depth explanation, I recommend my article ‘The Economic End Game Explained.’ To summarize, globalists are setting the stage for what they often refer to as the “global economic reset.” This reset is essentially a major crisis event which will be exploited by globalists to centralize the system even further, into a one world currency and one world economy, governed by the banking elites through institutions like the IMF and the BIS.

The U.S. economy and the U.S. dollar must be diminished in order for this to happen. And with conservatives supposedly “in control” of the U.S. government and the U.S. economy at the time of the crash, guess who is slated to get the blame? I’ll give you a hint: Not the central bankers…
In the meantime, the globalists hope that the majority of the world will buy into the fallacy of linchpin theory. They hope everyone will blame decentralization and “complexity” instead of centralization and over-simplicity in the system. And it is certainly possible that the hijacking of a Chinese corporate official will be held up as the domino that started the collapse.


[PS: "Cara McCarthy" seems to be Brandon Smith in drag!]

Friday, December 7, 2018

Turdo-Charged Canada Rushes to Eliminate Itself

From here:

Canada: Opposition, protests and a petition against the UN Migration Pact

The UN Migration Pact represents a catastrophic dismantling of key components of democratic institutions by the United Nations, a body that has increasingly alliedwith the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The Pact — officially named the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” — indicates that it “offers a 360-degree vision of international migration and recognizes that a comprehensive approach is needed to optimize the overall benefits of migration, while addressing risks and challenges for individuals and communities in countries of origin, transit and destination.” It also states that “No country can address the challenges and opportunities of this global phenomenon on its own.” 
This means (sarcasm warning ahead) that all countries must depend on the competent, just and democratic United Nations to guide them to enjoying the benefits of mass migration. To do this, one would have to turn a blind eye to the globalist vision of open borders that has plunged Europe into crisis, a crisis that has led in turn to the rise of the so-called “populist” movement. Contrary to the media’s labeling of it as “racist” and “Nazi,” this movement supports democracy, supports Israel, and aims to defend free societies, marginalize Islamic supremacists, and stop their incursions into Western countries. So-called “populist” leaders have also sought to protect their citizens from the damage of unlimited, unvetted migration.
Canada, in contrast, has offered to “lead the charge”on the UN Migration Pact.
As a concerned, patriotic Canadian citizen and Royal Canadian Air Force F18 retired combat pilot, Major Russ Cooper — co-founder of the group Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms — wrote a summary of his concerns about the UN Migration Pact:
Objective 2 which commits destination nations to the elimination of poverty and social inequity in originating nations;
Objective 5 requirement to assist migrants with identifying the best host country for their needs;
Objective 7 stipulation that calls for “irregular” status migrants to be considered for “regular” status;
Objective 16 direction to accommodate family reunification programs thereby expanding, exponentially, the flow rate of migration;
Objective 17 requirement to eliminate “all forms of discrimination” in the host population including those that call into question the political opinions of migrants. Here we can see Motion M-103 as a precursor for a larger, more comprehensive Global Compact initiative;
Objective 17 direction to tightly control criticism of migrants and migration programs;
Objective 17 restrictions on media outlets and professionals to ensure they are properly “sensitized” and “educated” in matters pertaining to migration;
Objective 20 stipulations that faster, better, more efficient remittance programs be developed to funnel monies out of destination and into originating nations; and
Objective 22 requirement to make all migrant-gained social benefits and pensions portable to any other jurisdictions of his or her choice.
The Migration Pact can be read in full HERE.
Canada’s opposition Conservative leader Andrew Scheer advised Prime Minister Justin Trudeau: “Instead of signing international agreements that erode our sovereign right to manage our borders, the prime minister should focus on restoring order at home.” To that, Trudeau had no reply except to accuse Scheer of using “Rebel Media talking points.”
Restoring order in Canada and securing security, economic growth and jobs for Canadians, don’t appear to be on the agenda of the globalist Trudeau. It is well known that he welcomes anyone and everyone into Canada. Directly following Trump’s temporary immigration ban on Muslim countries, Trudeau tweeted“To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada.” Already, at least 25,000 Syrian refugees were accepted into the country in 2016, while there were over 20,000 illegal border crossings into Canada from the US through the Quebec border from early 2017 up to Spring 2018. Over the Easter weekend alone, 600 illegal migrants crossed into Canada. During the summer, such entries were expected to be around 400 per day. The crisis prompted even the Washington Post to publish an article: Nigerians are walking into Canada, prompting request for U.S. to take action. Since Spring, there has been virtual radio silence on the matter. The U.S.-Canadian border is approximately 3,987 miles long. Add to that the Alaska-Canada border, at 1,538 miles. By way of comparison, the U.S.-Mexican border is roughly 1,933 miles.
Unfortunately, persecuted Christians and Yazidis have not been included in Trudeau’s big welcome. Instead, Trudeau has welcomed in Islamic State jihadists who kill, rape and torture, hoping that these jihadists would be a “powerful voice” in Canada once they became “deradicalized.” Trudeau also has an Islamic entryist problem in his own government. He even sent a delegation to the 44th session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and imposed Islamic blasphemy laws on Canada via the anti-Islamophobia motion M-103. A followup to that motion documents the objective to “monitor citizens for compliance” and train law enforcement officers to investigate online and offline “hate speech.” Meanwhile, Trudeau discriminates against Christians — referring to them as the “worst part of Canadian society”; he cut off summer job funding to any organization who opposes abortion.
Some more appalling information: the Trudeau government has spent an astronomical amount of taxpayer money on self-serving media and social media campaigns: over $13,600,000 on sponsored social media posts, along with an earmarked $675,000,000 in funding for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 2016. And now with elections coming up in 2019, Trudeau has pledged a $595,000,000 media bailout for media news organizations of his choosing.
Now Canadians must pay for his migration project far into the future, just as Canada’s unemployment rate is the worst it has been in four decades.
This is the country, almost unrecognizable as Canada after three years of Trudeau, that now intends to lead the charge on the UN Migration Pact. President Trump has already rejected the pact, although since the U.S. shares a long border with Canada — as well as with Mexico — his administration’s work will clearly be cut out for it, amid his other battles against the relentless attacks from globalist Democrats. Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Israel, Austria, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Australia and Italy have also rejected the Pact.
A rally against the UN Migration Pact is set for this upcoming Saturday on Parliament Hill. Canadians are encouraged to sign a petition against the Pact HERE. Canada is set to sign the Pact in Morocco on December 10-11.

Monday, December 3, 2018

Fake news media run PR campaign for illegal 'migrants'

From here:

author-image Jesse Lee Peterson About | Email

Thank God Donald Trump is president! Can you imagine if Crooked Hillary Clinton, Socialist Bernie Sanders, or some weak RINO had managed to get in office? We’d have a 6,000-strong illegal alien mob called the “migrant caravan” allowed into our country, no questions asked. Under the pretense of “pleading asylum,” they’d come take Americans’ jobs, get free stuff and further corrupt our country. They’d join the tens of millions of illegals forcing vulnerable blacks out of their own communities. Likely their number would be much greater under a president who put illegal aliens ahead of American citizens.

Last week, at least 400 illegal aliens in Tijuana attempted to rush our border, some throwing large rocks at police. The media cast the violent mob in a sympathetic light, photographing women and barefoot children in the chaos. Forty-two were arrested, but none charged! The phony outrage was that border agents used tear gas on “kids.” Believe me, if any children had actually suffered harm, the media would have exploited them for front-and-center sob stories. The media has run a months-long PR campaign for these foreign invaders. The fake news media are truly the enemy of the people.

In June, evil people pushed phony concern for illegal alien children separated from “mothers,” and children being put in “cages.” I wrote then that Democrats don’t care about children – illegal or American In fact, the anti-Trump media and liberals have no love, but only out-of-control minds and emotions. They support abortion, sex outside of marriage, pornography, bad schools, crime, radical homosexuals and transgender madness – everything harmful to children. Led in darkness by their father the Devil, they exploit and corrupt women and children to advance an evil agenda. They call evil good and good evil.

President Trump is a nationalist, and so am I. Anyone who is not a nationalist is like an unfaithful father who leaves his wife and children to be with another woman and another man’s children. The man’s children suffer for lack of a good father giving them proper attention; the stepchildren never truly accept the stepfather; and neither of the women can ever respect such a man. This is what the Democrats, the liberal media, RINO Republicans, and many of the Never Trumpers are like – they’re not nationalists. They’re not good men or women.

Order Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson’s book, “The Antidote: Healing America from the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood.”

President Trump loves all people by doing what’s right. What’s right for American citizens is also good for illegal aliens – to deny them entry into our country. They don’t have a right to be here. They don’t have our values. We need to take care of home first – just as the illegal aliens (mostly men!) need to go home to repair their own countries.

We have a black American population in moral crisis – with Hispanics following close behind in violence, hatred and false victimhood. Families, where they exist at all, are weak and broken, producing criminals, drug addicts, single mothers and pathetic adult males. West Coast cities are overrun with homelessness, drugs and blight, driving out businesses. The 22-million-plus illegal aliens already here are raising anchor babies to reject our rule of law – and these “stepchildren” grow up to vote! Our education system is a scam upon the young people – filled with useless, leftist, anti-God, anti-man, anti-American indoctrination.

The media recently highlighted a “Native American” single mother elected to U.S. Congress, Deb Haaland of New Mexico. This woman suggested that President Trump was undermining Democracy and American values because of his “rhetoric” about “erasing trans people.” Imagine being raised with no father by a mother this misguided and committed to the godless “social justice” agenda. And imagine the degeneracy of the people who voted for such a woman as their representative!
Democrat voters also elected an American Indian lesbian and two Muslim women, in addition to the media-celebrated radical socialist millennial Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The president must deal with these radicals in the coming year – along with the anti-Trump establishment. They don’t want America to be made great again.

If we want the corrupt government to change, we the people must change. You must deal with evil in your personal lives, and not allow it to continue and grow. Evil will destroy you and others around you if you do not overcome it. Whites, especially white men, who see through the deception of the media, academia and government, must speak up without fear. Tell the truth to the people of color who are used to being fed lies. Start first by being honest with your family and those around you. And grow up, get married, and have babies!

As I frequently say, we have a great opportunity with this president in office. Although the people on the side of evil seem to increase in numbers, so too do the people of good. God told Abraham that he would not destroy Sodom and Gomorrah if He found ten good men among them. Children of God have the real power to keep America great – even in a minority! Satan can only tempt, deceive, and intimidate.

The president has repeatedly stood alone, and won.


Re: "Anyone who is not a nationalist is like an unfaithful father who leaves his wife and children to be with another woman and another man’s children. The man’s children suffer for lack of a good father giving them proper attention; the stepchildren never truly accept the stepfather; and neither of the women can ever respect such a man."

 - The Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson -

This excellent analogy can be paraphrased to describe criminally negligent delinquency (aka libertine liberalism) in all venues, not just in regards to nationalism.

Criminals, like their father, the Devil, insist no real criminals or even crimes exist because we're all really ever only equally helpless fellow victims, at the mercy of unknowably unknown, mysterious (yet somehow also mysteriously known to be "inevitable") forces beyond our comprehension and control - like the Marxist "historical predeterminism" aka victims of society, and slaves of Allah - such that there's no difference between the sort of "victim" who chooses to attack thereby innocent others first, (aka those currently known as "criminals") and those who don't. Therefore, they always demand pity (aka respect for their dignity, tolerance, mercy, forgiveness and compassion) for those fellow extortive gangsters - er, I mean "victims" - who insist on affording useless pity for everyone "equally," and anger only for those who embrace useful anger at criminals in order to stop and deter them from committing their crimes. In other words, such delinquent libertine "liberal" criminals always have an excuse for not having any free-will choices, while conservatives insist they always did and still do have a choice to restrain them selves from attacking innocent other people first. Go figure!


All excuse-making criminals are cowards.

"Psychotic, paranoid masochist hypocrites" always project: "I couldn't be responsible to myself or anyone else, because I was afraid - and I alone feel fear! (OK, if and when you're willing to indulge my excuse, you can share in it: "we all do it, too!") Whee!"

Even putting this cowardice into "psychological" (mental illness) terms, is to give in to one of their favorite excuses:

"I didn't do it! My brain made me do it! And in fact, I didn't do it at all! Only my brain did it! Whee!"

Therefore it's plain to see that all thought-killing, emotional-excuse-making, fear-focused cowardly criminal "psychotics" (aka "paranoid" "masochists" and "conflicted, cognitively dissonant, bi-polar manic-depressive hypocrites") are cowards.


The very dictionary definition of "Psycho-paths" is simply "thought-killers." It's not something only a trained expert medical authority can diagnose and therapeutically treat but never cure (because to such criminal negligents, the motto is always "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - Again!")! Anyone who can do it easily understands it.

All psychopaths are masochists and all masochists are psychopaths. Masochists aren't brave pain-lovers at all - they are cowards who only inflict pain on themselves to cancel what they consider as the additional pains called fears or "Fear."

But one's thoughts prioritize fears, not, as these psychotic masochists or masochistically psychotics choose to see them, as externally-generated inflictions of additional pains, but as internally-generated helpful warnings, to be heeded and used to avoid future pain-causing damage.

Their chosen view is simply one of permanent fear aka "paranoia." And since one's thoughts prioritize fear in order to earn hope, what these people who choose, in stead, to fear not the causes of their fears, but "only" the fear itself, are really trying to do is to kill off their thoughts.

Pretending it's smart to kill off one's thoughts is the most basic and blatant example of sheerest hypocrisy, yet that - and only that - is what every delinquent criminally negligent libertine "liberal" does all the time anyway: "Whee."

Even worse: "fascism" (communazi totalitarianism, collectivist conformity, i.e: total control aka slavery) always automatically results from group-might-made-rights to be pitied instead of scorned: in pretending they can't control them selves, excuse-making criminals must also "logically" insist that, ("since we, i.e: you, all do it, too") as nobody else can control them selves either, then they ("we") all must be controlled by other people (i.e: by "me")!

So, by pretending they can't control them selves, they also pretend they "must" try to control everyone else instead! In public, they always endorse useless pity over useful anger because it's less risky. But give them a large enough gang to dilute their own culpability and risk, while increasing their power to extort, and they will also advocate for anger at those who would be angry at such criminals for committing their crimes.

See "islam" for the "best" example of this.