Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Impending Cataclysm

From here:

It all comes down to this. The final presidential debate before Americans head to the polls to decide whether Western Civilization will survive another presidential term. Fox News's Chris Wallace will be moderating the debate, the first time a Fox News personality will have such a privilege.
For the informed voter, for the American who values his heritage, for people around the world who still hold out hope that greatness is possible and desirable, the choice could not be clearer. They can choose a man whose life story defines the American success story, who will tell the truth in the face of great adversity, and protect what is ours from those who would destroy it. Or, they can choose a woman whose entire existence is based in rent seeking through State power, a ruthless lying criminal who married a degenerate for political power, and revictimized his many victims countless times over to maintain her status.
We have a choice. We can choose the type of strength and fortitude that made America great, the spirit of men and women who sailed across an ocean with nothing to form the most powerful economy and military in the history of mankind. Or, we can choose equality with third world savages who make nothing but complaints and pleas for handouts.
A choice like this should not be difficult to make, but elements of our society have clouded the information pool in a way never before seen. At the commander in chief forum, the first and second debates, and throughout all the news coverage, including on Fox to date, Globalist owned media outlets have worked diligently and at great expense to their own credibility to skew the discussion and set America on a course to her utter destruction with Hillary Clinton at the helm. Despite all of this, polls are still neck and neck.

What role will Chris Wallace play? Will he attempt to level the playing field? Will he go after Hillary Clinton the way Matt Lauer, Lester Holt, Andersen Cooper, and Martha Raddatz went after Donald Trump? I doubt it. All Wallace has to do to please his masters is hold himself to the same journalistic standard his leftist counterparts pretend to play. By feigning neutrality, he will leave the scales tipped to Hillary Clinton, and the electorate will be left to do their own research, a task the average dumb as a box of rocks voter simply isn't up for.

No comments: