Monday, January 9, 2017

Bombshell New Study Suggests that Liberals are Far More Likely to Commit Crime than Conservatives

From here:

Wow. The results of a new study conducted by researchers from the University of Cincinnati, Florida State University, and Pennsylvania State University are sending shockwaves across the nation.

Four researchers sought to discover whether or not political ideology could predict involvement in criminal activity, but what they found could upend our entire political and criminal justice systems.
Political ideology represents an imperfect yet important indicator of a host of personality traits and cognitive preferences. These preferences, in turn, seemingly propel liberals and conservatives towards divergent life-course experiences. Criminal behavior represents one particular domain of conduct where differences rooted
in political ideology may exist. Using a national dataset, we test whether and to what extent political ideology is predictive of self-reported criminal behavior. Our results show that self-identified political ideology is mono-tonically related to criminal conduct cross-sectionally and prospectively and that liberals self-report more criminal conduct than do conservatives. We discuss potential causal mechanisms relating political ideology to individual conduct.
The data was gathered through “self-reported” behavior and is therefore cannot be trusted as a fool-proof result, but it is instructive in explaining important cultural differences between conservatives and liberals. The data gathered and research presented seems to indicate a very strong correlation between political ideology and willingness to commit criminal behavior!
This dramatic chart is both compelling and astonishing:
Fig. 1. Estimated standardized scores on criminal involvement wave 3 and 4 by political ideology.  
The researchers do caution against assuming a “causal relationship between liberal political ideology and criminal conduct,” but they also observe that there is corresponding research that shows political conservatives are more closely associated with reduced criminal behavior.
There is apparent scholarly agreement that conservatives more strongly value social order, respect for authority, and social conformity and that conservatives are more religious, more conscientious, and demonstrate higher levels of self-control. These traits and values likely influence lifestyle choices in ways that better insulate conservatives against criminal behavior. Moreover, conservative narratives about “free will, personal responsibility, and morality may gel into cognitive scripts that condemn criminal conduct as immoral and worthy of social sanctions.
The researchers also point out that academics and philosophers are realizing more and more that political ideology may play a larger role in our daily life than most people realize. In fact, political ideology may indicate what a person believes, thinks, and does in more places than just the voting booth.

Overall, our study joins a growing stream of empirical assessments that document differences between liberals and conservatives. Collectively, these studies show the potent yet often unexamined role political ideology plays in everyday life. Political ideology represents more than disparate views on the proper role of government and adherence to refined political theories. Ideology reflects an assortment of correlated beliefs and narratives about behavior that are internalized by individuals. These narratives likely impact individual choices, making some choices more likely and other choices less likely. Criminal behavior may also reflect choices rooted in ideological narratives—narratives that promote or reduce the occurrence of crime.

Well, of course libertine "liberals" are all criminals! And here's the scientific proof of it:



...but it's all just a simple matter of binary either/or logic anyway!

Morally and legally, rights can only come with responsibilities.
"Liberal" crime and hypocrisy is all about avoiding that fact.

And not-so coincidentally, so are ALL examples of "mental illness!"


If psychopathic hypocrites didn't see something as important, they wouldn't try so fearfully to avoid it, nor work so diligently and obsessively hard to excuse themselves from ignoring it. They are enemies of thinking itself, which they refuse to admit is all fear-based triage, so they can be guaranteed to always try to do the exact opposite of the most inteligent and obvious thing. In old Biblical parlance, they are the Adversary of doing what is right (as in correct)!

Like all other people, they are motivated primarily by fear.

Unlike most others, they are motivated by the fear of 'it' - they are idolaters who try to distance them selves from the idealized ideology of "fear" as if "it" were a separate generalized force with which they could do combat.

They reject the truth - that all fears are separate but still generalized memories of specific pains, projected to the future. They must be analyzed and broken down into their originally-sourced component parts and scrutinized as to their present applicabilities, not rejected en masse.

This process is what has been attempted by psychiatrists and psychologists since the time of Sigmund Freud, BUT because they imitated the confessional, authoritarian approach of the Catholic church, they refused to let individuals apply their techings to them selves, in stead making them into helpless victims who were dependent on the 'doctors' as high priests of the new, 'secular' religion.

In other words, they refused to let people solve their own problems, in favour of enslaving them to a permanent dependency on them selves, because as usual, "There's No Money In Solutions, So Please Give Generously Again!"

Therefore, criminally negligent, morally and intellectually delinquent libertines (aka 'liberals') are emotion-based, but that emotion is idealized 'fear:' the strategy is to deny it, the tactics are all victim-blaming slander and (as is the case with religion) the promotion of mere cause-and-effect-free hope trumped up as the equally idealized, magical power called 'Faith!' to be used to "combat it!" And since 'fear' is the basis for all thinking, they substitute repetitive ritual templates and formats for actual case-by-case thinking.

Leftists fear other people's free-will choices. ALL criminal gangsters (leftists, muslims) want the POWER to forcibly CONTROL all other people, (whom they fear), through fear, simply because they can not trust them selves. As fear-fearing phobophobes, they are scared of others' fears, and so always accuse them of being afraid (as if being afraid or a phobe were some sort of thought-crime)!

Here's a short list of THEIR most prominent common phobias:

Racist, (melanin-o-phobe) Sexist, (femophobe) Homophobic, Xenophobic, Islamophobic, (aka Crime-o-phobic) - you name it.

Yet the only real thought crime is in refusing to think at all, because one is scared of the pain of fearful thought!

In one word, what they fear the most is "Freedom!" In stead, they prefer the safe surety and security of "inevitable" slavery! They are cowardly, suicidal masochists at heart - always seeking to control their own fears, BY causing those very same, worst-case scenario problems which cause the pains they fear the most!

"Since there is no free will, we have no choice but to commit "crimes" (because in every choice we make, something else must have "made" us choose one way rather than the other, right? And the only thing which that inevitable force can NOT have been, is "free will!") Because life is too complex for any of us to ever really be able to understand causes and effect, such that all so-called "facts" are really ever only opinions anyway. Therefore my entirely fact-free, subjective opinions are to be legally held up as being the diversely opposite EQUALS to your silly objective facts! Therefore there are no real "crimes" nor "criminals" because there is no 'mens-rea' guilty mind free-will choice at all, and so we're really ever all only helpless VICTIMS (of predetermined predestined forces, like of society/mere products of our environments, and of course proudly helpless slaves of allah)! Therefore the only real crime possible is to accuse any other victims of being "criminals" just for having committed their "crimes" against some "other" helpless victims!



That was a true depiction of the caricature of thought used by libertine criminals (aka circular 'reasoning' tautology!) as their #1 alibi to excuse their crimes; aka:

"We're not criminals, we're all really only victims too!"
(And the only people who see 'criminal enemies' are 'insane')! aka "Paranoid" and "conspiracy theorists!"

Libertines ("liberals") are criminals, who follow the brazen rule of chaos. Conservatives obey the Golden Rule of Law.

The Golden Rule is "Do Not Attack First!" The rule of chaos says "All is allowed unless specifically forbidden first!"

Democrats are gangsters. Republicans are individualists who occasionally group together to stop gangsters' extortion.

Gangsters aren't 'sociopaths' (they love grouping together for mob violence) but they are psycho-paths (which literally means "thought killers")! aka HYPOCRITES! 'Subjectivists' who oppose universal equal rights in favor of their double-standards and divisive, adversarial group-identity politics! Us-vs-them and might-makes-right, not right-makes-might!

ALL criminals are always hypocrites who want rights without responsibilities: to our stuff, without having to earn of otherwise pay for it! So extortionists will always use victimology as their main alibi to excuse their ongoing crimes.

UPDATES from here:

A recent study from the Brookings Institution found a strong correlation between a university’s high tuition costs and the likelihood of its student body conducting PC witch hunts and silencing dissenting opinions:
The average enrollee at a college where students have attempted to restrict free speech comes from a family with an annual income $32,000 higher than that of the average student in America….The pattern is clear: the more economically exclusive the institution, the more likely the students have attempted to hinder free speech.
No surprises there. Rich white students tend to suffer from “trauma envy” and thus have an insatiable need to identify with the “oppressed,” so long as such identification is done from a “safe space” where they don’t have to get unnecessarily dirty or suffer any oppression themselves. Poorer students tend to get distracted by trivialities such as wondering how they’ll feed themselves for the rest of their lives.
study published in the April 2017 edition of Motivation and Emotion confirms what we’ve been saying all along—the tendency to enter a public arena and thump one’s chest about the latest moral outrage has far less to do with any actual concern about social injustice than it does a psychological need of the chest-thumper to alleviate their own tangled guilt complexes. Researchers Zachary Rothschild and Lucas Keefer found that “moral outrage at third-party transgressions is sometimes a means of reducing guilt over one’s own moral failings and restoring a moral identity.” They also found that the deeper one’s sense of personal moral failure is, the more likely they are to publicly persecute some third party for similar ethical transgressions.
Let them have their guilt, but don’t let them try to foist it on you. After all, guilt is for the guilty.

No comments: