Thursday, January 5, 2017

Free Speech and the 1st Amendment

From here, and from here:

Lying is the most basic form of theft: it's the (at least, attempted) theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, lying (aka "fraud" and "slander") is a crime, and all (non-defensively offensive) frauds are criminals. And as such, most if not all criminals are also hypocrites who want to extort subjective double-standard rights without responsibilities for only them selves and other like-minded criminals, and to deny their victims their rights to self-defense from criminals, by encouraging them to falsely consider them selves to be somehow responsible to the "victimized" criminals' hurt feelings. Since criminology depends on proving 'mens-rea' guilty-mind free-will criminal intent, the criminal's first duty to his craft is to deny any and all self-reliant free will choice even exists, or if it does exist, it doesn't matter because life is too complex for anyone to really ever be able to understand cause-and-effect logic or rationality. They must therefore posit that since all choices are caused by some other pre-existing, predestined and predetermined inevitable yet magical mysterious and ultimately inexplicable force, we really have no free will choices at all in life, and as such there are no real "crimes" nor "criminals" because we're all really ever only helpless victims - of "society"/ mere products of our environments, and of course proudly helpless slaves of unknown and unknowable "allah!" Therefore, the only thing we can know for sure, is that the only 'cause' of all these inexplicable existential effects we experience which we can and so should always rule out, is that of this mythical "free will choice" itself!

Therefore, they continue, the only real crime should be to offend other victims by daring to insult them by accusing them of being "criminals," simply because they attempted and even possibly succeeded in carrying out their "crimes" against "other" helpless victims! This is both how and why all of the soft-science "humanities" faculties in our education systems invariably and almost inevitably become victimology. These "Institutes of Higher Learning" teach students how to deny cause-and-effect in order to become slanderous extortionists claiming to be non-compus-mentis "victims!" We see it every day as hordes of entitled feral Millenial "activist" extortionists demand ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves by slandering everyone else.

So our education system reflects this inherent criminal hypocrisy, betraying us and our children.

Slanderous criminal extortionists will always spew victimology as they try to pretend they are the real victims, and their victims are the real criminals. Reversing and ignoring cause-and-effect is who they are and what they do.

So of course they try to reverse the onus of proof, to get us to have to 'prove a negative' ("Prove you DIDN'T offend me!") which is of course subjective and impossible, because even if they could prove one DID offend them, their criminally hypocritical definition of offense is where they want to be the only ones to have rights and no responsibilities to others, and everyone else to only have a responsibility to them and no rights to self-defense what so ever. The cause-and-effect-reversed onus of disproof is now "Accusing me of my crimes after the fact is what made me commit them in the first place!"

ALL criminals always want ever-more rights - like, to our stuff, without having any responsibilities to earn or otherwise pay for it - and the only way to thus divide rights away from responsibilities is to offload their own responsibilities (which are to control their aggressive predatory criminal urges to attack thereby innocent others first) onto their victims, by denying said victims their rights to defend themselves and innocent others. They pretend it's as equally immoral to defensively counter-attack an attacking criminal as it was for the criminal to initiate the attack in the first place. This immoral relativism corruption can be found as far back as Christianity where we are told to "Resist not evil men" and to always turn the other cheek; and that vengeance (aka simple Justice) is the Lord's alone.

So our religion, too, reflects this inherent criminal hypocrisy, betraying us and our children.

A main purpose of the first amendment and free speech in general is to ask other people for assistance in stopping crimes by being able to accuse criminals of committing them.

Yet even our own Western societies have become so corrupted by the deference of our own rights and responsibilities to putative expert "authorities" - where certain gang leaders enjoy idolatrous rights without responsibilities, to do our thinking and acting "for us" and "for our own good" - that we citizens aren't even allowed to make the determination that a crime has been committed, let alone actually legally accuse anyone else of their crimes - without their prior approval! Even the cops who arrest criminals must kow-tow to the wisdom and power of the prosecutors office before the case can be taken to trial, and the prosecution must defer to the judges and their considerations of defense lawyers.

Thus our entire "justice" system has been designed from its inception to subvert individual human rights to idolatrous gang might-made "group rights" - for instance, to "society" alone, and even these days to all sub-group victimologies and the divisively slanderous extortions of perpetual "victim" group identity politics.

So our Justice system also reflects this inherent criminal hypocrisy, betraying us and our children.

But what of "Hate-Crimes!" one might ask? 
Well, that's simple and easy to understand!

"Bullying" (cyber, or otherwise) is already subject to laws against extortion. Extortion is also known as bullying, intimidation, coercion, duress, blackmail, activist agitation, and, of course, terrorism.

As for "hate-crimes:" we already have laws against slander.

Slander is fraud, and it’s a crime because it’s used to accuse people of crimes, without having a shred of evidence to back those accusations up.

The aim of slander is to falsely inspire hatred (perpetual anger) in others, and to hope to incite them to violence.

However, hatred itself is often a good thing, because if people were unable to hate crimes and the criminals that commit them, no one would ever bother to accuse any criminals of their crimes, nor by doing so , hope to end those crimes. Idiots who want to make "hate" (a symptom, or an effect) into a crime, can only ever end up making it 'illegal' to hate crimes!

So what’s the difference between slander and “hate-crimes” legislation?

Well, for starters, the only defense against charges of slander, is the Truth (your accusations are not slander if you can objectively prove them)!

But “hate-crimes laws” are based not on objective Truth, but on the subjectively-claimed “perception” that one is being unfairly accused of one’s crimes, even if there’s proof one did indeed commit them!

So, accusing someone of a “hate-crime” and not of slander, IS in fact, only slander!

But it’s official, government-backed and police-state-enforced slander!

But, what of "Hate-Speech!" one might also ask? 
Well, that's equally simple and easy to understand!

ALL "Hate-Speech Laws" ARE CRIMES!

“Progressive” criminals - who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims' rights - pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).

So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, "make" them commit even more crimes!

Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?

NO - not because it's "hateful" (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and "HATE" is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without 'hate' we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in  order to stop those crimes.

Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at - but that's already illegal, not because of the anger displayed - that's just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts - but because it's fraudulent slander.

Such criminal leftists who try to make "hate" into a crime, only ever make it 'illegal' to hate crime itself!

Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats ... and even those aren't illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!

See how simple that was? Too bad "our leaders" aka politicians are professional hypocrites, whose criminally negligent motto has ever been "There's No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously - AGAIN!" They get paid to pretend to be too stupid to understand problems, in order to never have to solve them, and in fact to exploit the almost infinite symptoms of unsolved problems as ever-more lucrative "causes" as "eternal crises" to champion in stead!



Terrorism works.

By now, everyone knows islam is nothing more than a criminal terror gang which blames a "god" as its holy-mobster "muslim" gang members' #1 alibi to excuse their own criminal desires and actions, and that as such, all "muslims" who are devoted to their crime-manual are at least potential terrorists.

When confronted by fear, people can respond in two ways:

1.) Honestly – they admit they’re afraid, and so then try to do something about solving the problem; (Conservatives;)

2.) Dishonestly – they pretend to be martyrs, but remain masochists, advising everyone else to Submit, too. (Liberals).

Guess which category most politicians (self-promoting salesmen and liars) fall into?

The solution?

Whenever any organism is attacked, it counter-attacks. (Organisms which submit to diseases like islam, die off).

Cells which have already been successfully co-opted by the disease are also destroyed by the white blood cells.

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, yet the criminally negligent greed-creed motto of those in charge always seems to be the exact opposite, that: “There’s No Money In Solutions! Whee!” (and its corollary: “It’s not broken, so let’s fix it!”)

The real reason the islamic threat is being ignored in public, is this not-so-nascent “Globalization” movement, which is clearly treason to ALL sovereign national people’s governments. It’s a plutocratic kleptocracy to be run by all those corporazis who never want to pay any taxes to anyone, anywhere, ever; by the global communazi labour guys who want free movement and the same lowest common denominator wages for their 3rd-world slaves, and of course by the moslems who want their one-world islamic ummah, to be run by their theocratic caliphate government. It’s a triple-threat. Against all these evil forces, we have only the Truth … while only they currently control both the fear and the greed.

As long as ONLY the enemy controls both the behavioural conditioning binaries of the stick (fear of personally having one’s own family firebombed or beheaded by the Jihad) and the carrot (greed for oil-money bribes), those sales-puppets we laughingly call “our leaders” and their complicit media presstitute pets will insist on maintaining their preposterously backwards, victim-blaming “narrative” that only we are to blame for the Qur’an’s 1,400 years of hate, so that we should all “Submit and learn how to be better victims!”

As long as we remain the lesser threat to them, "our leaders" will continue to ignore islam.

So our system of government reflects this inherent criminal hypocrisy, betraying us and our children.

1 comment:

Blogger said...

SuperPayMe is the best get-paid-to site.