It’s fun to watch the media squirm sometimes. We all saw the dead
child face down in the sand months ago as sign that anyone who didn’t
condone the invasion and destruction of Europe was a racist child
murdering bigot. More recently, we saw the image of Omran Daqneesh, a
Syrian child bloodied and covered with dust, sitting silently in an
ambulance awaiting help after his family’s house was destroyed by an
airstrike allegedly carried out by Russian backed Assad forces.
We are reminded of the human cost of war and our sympathy is
commanded toward far away peoples who would see us dead if they had the
means. We are then ordered to give them said means, by way of open
immigration and even government subsidies therefor.
We’re supposed to forget the fact that welfare funded “refugees” in the United States have already gone on to fight for ISIS. We’re not supposed to take into consideration the fact that the National Intelligence Director says ISIS will infiltrate refugee populations
to stage attacks. We’re supposed to forget that tens of thousands of
“refugees” are already in the United States, that some have already
committed horrific terrorist attacks, that terrorist attacks in Europe
are hardly even newsworthy anymore, and that some of these attackers are
second generation invaders born and raised to kill inside our own
countries. All this, for the children.
Then we get those little reminders that not all children are quite the innocent victims the photos lead us to believe. A child blew up a wedding in Turkey killing dozens, and most of his victims were under 14 years old. Another child attempted to set off a suicide vest in Iraq, but he was stopped and stripped of his explosives before they could be detonated. ISIS calls their child soldiers “Cubs of the Caliphate” and parades them around in their propaganda proudly.
Their attitude toward children is “Screw it, we’ll make more”. Meanwhile white people are quitting breeding for climate change, and to check their white privilege to the point that America’s birth rates are now a national emergency.
Forgive me then if I seem a bit unconvinced when leftists cry out
“for the children”. If they loved children so much, they would stop
burdening them with debt before they are born. They would stop
subsidizing birth control and abortion so that more would be born. They
certainly wouldn’t be importing murderous welfare dependent savages at
the expense of future generations, or disarming the parents who would
protect the children therefrom. They hate children because children
represent the continuation of our society, and they want our society to
Similarly, if the liberals were so "for the children," as noted recently elsewhere, such that they pretend "if banning guns could save just one child, it'd
be worth it!" then why not apply the same logic such that "if banning
muslims could save just one child from being bombed or raped" it'd be
worth it, too - no? But if libertine "liberal" criminals are anything definable, they are total racists and hypocrites!